Skip to main content
Download PDF

Impact of maternal dietary carbohydrate intake and vitamin D-related genetic risk score on birth length: the Vitamin D Pregnant Mother (VDPM) cohort study

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth volume 22, Article number: 690 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Our objectives were to investigate the relationship between maternal vitamin D status and IGF-1 levels in healthy Minangkabau pregnant mothers and their impact on newborn anthropometry outcomes and to examine whether this relationship was modified by dietary intake using a nutrigenetic approach.

Methods

Healthy singleton pregnant mother and infant pairs (n = 183) were recruited. We created three genetic risk scores (GRSs): a six-SNP GRS based on six vitamin D-related single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) involved in the synthesis of vitamin D (vitamin D-GRS), a two-SNP GRS using SNPs in VDR genes (VDR-GRS) and a four-SNP GRS using SNPs from DHCR7, GC, CYP24A1 and CYP2R1 genes (non-VDR GRS). The effect of the GRSs on IGF-1, vitamin D and newborn anthropometry and the interaction between the GRSs and dietary factors were tested using linear regression analysis.

Results

The vitamin D- and non-VDR GRSs were significantly associated with lower 25(OH)D concentration (p = 0.005 and p = 0.001, respectively); however, there was no significant association with IGF-1, and newborn anthropometry outcomes. However, there was a significant interaction of VDR-GRS with carbohydrate intake on birth length outcome (Pinteraction = 0.032). Pregnant mothers who had higher carbohydrate intake (405.88 ± 57.16 g/day) and who carried ≥ 2 risk alleles of VDR-GRS gave birth to babies with significantly lower birth lengths compared to babies born to mothers with < 2 risk alleles (p = 0.008).

Conclusion

This study identified a novel interaction between VDR-GRS and carbohydrate intake on birth length outcome. These findings suggest that reducing the intake of carbohydrates during pregnancy, particularly for those who have a higher genetic susceptibility, might be an effective approach for preventing foetal growth abnormalities.

Peer Review reports

Background

The neonatal mortality rate in Indonesia in 2017 was reported to be 12.4 per 1,000 live births [1], which is higher than in other South East Asian countries [2]. Key factors in this high prevalence may include the poor quality of perinatal health services, newborns with low birth weight and smaller size, and short birth interval factors [3]. Optimal intrauterine growth is necessary for foetal development and contributes to the long-term health of the newborn. Foetal growth may also be influenced by the interactions between genetic, nutritional, hormonal and environmental factors [4].

Vitamin D deficiency is a worldwide public health concern [5] and is mainly caused by inadequate exposure to sunlight. Vitamin D deficiency has been recognised as an epidemic in many regions, including Europe, America, the Middle East and Asia [6,7,8,9]. Vitamin D status during pregnancy has a significant impact on maternal health and foetal growth [10]. Vitamin D is a potentially modifiable regulator of the Insulin-like Growth Factor 1 (IGF-1) axis and a positive correlation has been demonstrated between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) and IGF-1 levels [11, 12]. Placental growth hormones (GH) are produced by the placental syncytiotrophoblast and gradually replace pituitary GH from eight weeks of gestation in maternal circulation, increasing during pregnancy. The increase in maternal serum IGF-1 is thought to be caused by placental GH [13]. Previous studies have also demonstrated that maternal serum IGF-1 levels are significantly associated with increasing gestational age [14, 15]. However, while recent cross-sectional studies based on prospective cohort design found a positive relationship between serum 25(OH)D and IGF-1 levels [11, 12, 16, 17], the relationship between vitamin D and IGF-1 levels in pregnancy outcomes remains unknown.

It has been determined that vitamin D-related single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) affect 25(OH)D concentrations, yet only a few studies have found evidence of this in South East Asian populations, notably in Minangkabau mothers, West Sumatra, Indonesia [18,19,20]. The Minangkabau is a matrilineal community in West Sumatra that has a high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency [21,22,23,24,25,26,27], which comes despite the tropical climate and abundant sunlight exposure all year round in Indonesia. Low vitamin D status has been shown to have a negative impact on foetal growth and development in areas such as bone development and the immune and nervous systems during pregnancy [28, 29]. In addition to genetic factors, race and ethnicity play an important role in the determination of vitamin D status [30]. Dietary factors also contribute to vitamin D status [18, 28, 29].

To our knowledge, no prior study has examined the relationship between vitamin D, IGF-1 and newborn anthropometry in Indonesia, particularly among the Minangkabau population, West Sumatra. This study identified whether this relationship was modified by dietary intake during pregnancy using a nutrigenetic study. Due to the high level of confounding that can influence phenotypic associations, we created three genetic risk scores (GRSs) using genetic variants as markers of maternal vitamin D concentration, given that genetic associations are less prone to confounding, and tested for their association with 25(OH)D, IGF-1 and newborn anthropometry outcomes.

Methods

Study population

The Vitamin D Pregnant Mother (VDPM) cohort study was conducted in West Sumatra Province, Indonesia from 1 June 2017 to 1 May 2018. The study design had been published previously [18, 20, 25, 31,32,33,34]. Different geographical locations were used, including two cities in mountainous areas (Payakumbuh, Lima Puluh Kota) and three cities in coastal areas (Padang, Pariaman, Padang Pariaman). The target population included the first trimester of pregnancy and their newborns (n = 183, p < 0.05). We followed all subjects up to their delivery process to perform newborn anthropometry measurements (birth weight, birth length and head circumference).

The VDPM study included mothers who 1) visited a public health care centre during the first trimester of pregnancy (< 13 weeks), 2) were healthy based on a doctor’s examination and health history, and 3) were willing to participate in the study, sign an informed consent and follow the research procedures. The exclusion criteria were mothers with multiple pregnancies, preeclampsia, miscarriage or stillbirth, chronic illnesses such as diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease or hypothyroidism, and those who were taking drugs that can interfere with vitamin D metabolism. Of a total of 239 mothers, 53 dropped out for various reasons, including pregnancy loss, change of residence, unwillingness to continue with the research, and inability to contact again. This left a total of 186 pregnant mothers who completed all requirements and attended follow-ups from T1 to delivery. After subsequently excluding three samples due to low DNA yield, 366 subjects (183 mother and infant pairs) were used for the present study to determine the association between GRS and 25(OH)D concentration in newborn anthropometry. Additionally, 180 subjects were used to determine the association between IGF-1 and 25(OH)D concentration on newborn anthropometry and pregnancy outcomes and whether this relationship was modified by genetic variants of vitamin D. The subject recruitment process is shown in our recently published article [18].

Subjects’ characteristics

Maternal sociodemographic factors were recorded using structured questionnaires. Demographic data including age, age group, education and sun exposure status were collected. These data were prospectively collected from medical records or interviews with the participants. Sun exposure status was defined by the duration of sun exposure, which was calculated as the average time spent daily in the sun during the participants’ leisure and working time. Maternal anthropometric measurements included pre-conception body weight, height and pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI). These data were collected by a trained nutritionist to increase the accuracy of the anthropometric data collection. Pre-pregnancy BMI was calculated based on the routine height measurements taken during clinic visits and pre-pregnancy body weight data were obtained during interviews through the maternal and child monitoring book. Maternal body weight was measured to the nearest 50 g using an electronic scale (Seca 815, Seca GmbH. Co. kg, Germany) and height was measured to the nearest millimetre using a stadiometer (Seca 217, Seca GmbH. Co. kg, Germany). The BMI calculation was based on the body weight (kg) divided by the square of body height (m) and we used the Asia–Pacific classification to define nutritional status [35].

Biochemical measurements

To determine IGF-1 and 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels, blood samples (3 ml) were collected by a trained phlebotomist in the first and third trimesters for 25(OH)D and the third trimester for IGF-1. The blood samples were used to measure serum IGF-1 and 25(OH)D levels using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) with an xMark Microplate Spectrophotometer (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc, Hercules, California, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Serum concentrations of IGF-1 were assessed using ELISA kits from Bioassay Technology Laboratory (Shanghai, China). The serum IGF-1 levels ranged from 2.11 ng/mL to 347.46 ng/mL and assay sensitivity was 0.058 ng/mL. The intra-assay and inter-assay values were < 8% and < 10%, respectively. Serum levels of 25(OH)D were assessed using ELISA from Diagnostic Biochemistry Canada (DBC) 25-Hydroxyvitamin D ELISA kit (DBC, London, Ontario Canada). The assay has a sensitivity of 5.5 ng/ml and intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation of 5% and 8.1%, respectively. Vitamin D status was defined as serum 25(OH)D < 12 ng/mL (vitamin D deficient), 12–19 ng/mL (vitamin D insufficient) and ≥ 20 ng/mL (vitamin D sufficient) according to Institute of Medicine (IOM) guidelines [5].

Dietary intake assessment

A trained nutritionist was recruited to collect the dietary intake data. The pregnant mothers were asked about their third-trimester dietary intake status. Macronutrients such as carbohydrates, protein and fat intake were collected and analysed after the data collection as crude intake (g/day). Dietary data and intake during pregnancy were collected and assessed using a validated semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (SQ-FFQ) [26, 27]. All data provided by the participants were analysed and the nutritionist asked the mothers to think specifically about their dietary consumption during their third trimester of pregnancy.

SNPs selection and genotyping analysis

We selected six candidate SNPs based on the following criteria: (1) biological significance in vitamin D synthesis, and metabolism; (2) SNPs with minor allele frequency of > 5%, (3) evidence of significant association with the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes that determine newborn anthropometry [36,37,38], and (4) evidence of a significant association with 25(OH)D concentrations in previous genome-wide association studies and RCT studies [39,40,41,42]. The selected genes were DHCR7 (rs12785878), CYP2R1 (rs12794714), GC (rs2282679), CYP24A1 (rs6013897) and VDR (rs2228570 and rs7975232).

Blood samples were collected from all the study subjects. Genomic DNA was isolated from peripheral blood leukocytes using the PureLink Genomic DNA Mini Kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, USA). DNA was also extracted from the whole blood using the PureLink Genomic DNA Mini Kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The DNA concentration was determined using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Isogen Life Science, De Meern, the Netherlands). Genotyping was performed using the competitive allele-specific PCR-KASP assay at LGC Genomics, London, UK.

Pregnancy outcomes

Gestational age (GA) at birth was calculated from the estimated GA obtained by obstetricians or midwives through an examination using either a transabdominal ultrasound or the date of last menstrual period in the absence of ultrasound at a maternal clinic or hospital. Infant birth weight, birth length and head circumference were recorded at birth using Seca mechanical measuring scales (Seca 803, Seca GmbH. Co. kg, Hamburg, Germany). We classified newborn anthropometry status according to the World Health Organization Child Growth Standards for head circumference-for-age (small head circumference, < 35 cm and normal head circumference, ≥ 35 cm), weight-for-age (low birth weight, < 2,500 g and normal birth weight ≥ 2,500 g) and length-for-age (short birth length, < 50 cm and normal birth length, ≥ 50 cm) [43]. Placental weight was recorded by the obstetrician who delivered the baby and categorised as normal when the weight was greater than or equal to 500 g. Assessment of neonatal Apgar scores was undertaken at minutes 5 and 10 after birth. A newborn with 5-min and 10-min Apgar scores of 7 to 10 was categorised as normal status; subsequent 5-min and 10-min scores of < 7 were categorised as a low Apgar score. In addition, small-for-gestational age (SGA) was calculated as the weight below the 10th percentile for gestational age. Preterm birth was described as a delivery that occurred before the 37th week of pregnancy. The mode of delivery was classified as vaginal birth or caesarean section.

Data analysis

We used the SPSS statistical package (version 23; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) for the statistical analysis. The results from the descriptive analyses are presented as means ± standard deviations (SD) for continuous variables and as percentages for categorical variables. All six genetic variants were in the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) (p > 0.05), which was tested using a chi-square test [20]. Pre-pregnancy BMI was defined according to the World Health Organization Asia Pacific Guidelines for Asians as non-obese (BMI < 25 kg/m2) and obese (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2) [44]. Normality of variable distribution was verified using the Shapiro–Wilk test; any variables that were not normally distributed were log-transformed prior to the analysis, such as 25(OH)D (ng/mL) and IGF-1 (ng/mL) concentration. Details of the power calculation have previously been published elsewhere [18].

Given the lack of any pre-existing cut-off points for IGF-1 status, the variable was divided into tertiles. The lowest tertile group was classified as those who had log-transformed IGF-1 ≤ 1.20 ng/mL, the medium tertile group was categorised as those who had values from 1.20 to 1.34 ng/mL and the highest tertile group was classified as those with values ≥ 1.35 ng/mL. Multivariate linear regression models were constructed to examine the phenotypic and genetic associations in this study: 1) the association between maternal vitamin D status and IGF-1 levels using a two-tailed t-test analysis, 2) the association between serum IGF-1 levels and newborn anthropometry outcomes, and 3) the association of vitamin D-related GRSs with 25(OH)D concentration and IGF-1 level during pregnancy.

The following interactions were tested: 1) the interaction between GRSs and serum IGF-1 levels on newborn anthropometry outcomes; 2) the interaction between GRS and 25(OH)D T3 levels on IGF-1 T3 levels during pregnancy; 3) the interaction between GRS and dietary intake on newborn anthropometry outcomes. These interactions were tested using linear regression after adjusting for potential confounding factors such as age, pre-pregnancy BMI, total energy intake, vitamin D, GA at birth and gender of the infant, wherever appropriate. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

The three GRSs were created by summing the risk alleles from five genes [39,40,41,42]. The ‘Vitamin D-GRS’ was created from the six SNPs, rs12785878 (DHCR7), rs12794714 (CYP2R1), rs2282679 (GC), rs6013897 (CYP24A1), and rs2228570 and rs7975232 (VDR), that play a role in the synthesis and metabolism of vitamin D. Two SNPs in VDR genes were included in the ‘VDR-GRS’ and four SNPs in genes encoding proteins involved in 25(OH)D synthesis and metabolism (GC, CYP24A1, DHCR7) were included in the ‘non-VDR-GRS’. This study distinguished between VDR-GRS and Non-VDR-GRS due to the VDR gene variants associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes [18]. Assessing the influence of VDR gene variants alone may be a key factor in determining the association between 25(OH)D concentration and newborn anthropometry outcomes.

Results

Characteristics of the study subjects

The characteristics of the study participants stratified by third trimester (T3) vitamin D status are shown in Table 1. This study found that deficiency-insufficiency vitamin D status was significantly more prevalent among mothers aged 20–30 years than sufficiency vitamin D status (p = 0.025). There was no association between vitamin D status and newborn anthropometry outcomes (p > 0.05). Mothers with a sufficient vitamin D status had statistically higher IGF-1 levels than mothers with a deficiency-insufficiency vitamin D status (p = 0.036). The change in 25(OH)D concentration was significantly higher for mothers in the ‘sufficiency’ vitamin D status group (p < 0.001).

Table 1 Characteristics of study subjects based on T3 vitamin D status
Full size table

Association between IGF-1 and newborn anthropometry and pregnancy outcomes

There was no statistically significant association between IGF-1 levels and newborn anthropometry outcomes such as birthweight, birth length and head circumference (p > 0.05 for all comparisons, Additional File 1). Furthermore, there was no significant association between the IGF-1 levels and pregnancy outcomes such as small-for-gestational age (SGA status of preterm birth, mode of delivery, placental weight, Apgar 5’ and Apgar 10’ (p > 0.05 for all comparisons, Additional File 1)).

Association between GRSs and 25(OH)D concentration

There was a statistically significant association between the vitamin D-GRS and non-VDR-GRS and log-transformed 25(OH)D concentration in both the crude and adjusted models (p < 0.05, for all comparisons), where individuals carrying a greater number of risk alleles had a lower 25(OH)D concentration than those carrying a smaller number of risk alleles (Table 2). There was no association between VDR-GRS and 25(OH)D concentration (p > 0.05, for all comparisons).

Table 2 Association between GRS and serum 25(OH)D levels during T3 of pregnancy
Full size table

Interaction between GRSs and serum IGF-1 levels on newborn anthropometry outcomes

As shown in Additional File 2, there was no statistically significant interaction between GRSs and log-transformed IGF-1 for newborn anthropometry outcomes such as birthweight, birth length and head circumference (p > 0.05 for all comparisons).

Interaction between GRS and 25(OH)D concentration on serum IGF-1 levels during pregnancy

No statistically significant interactions were found between GRSs and log-transformed 25(OH)D concentration on log-transformed IGF-1 levels during pregnancy (p > 0.05 for all comparisons) (Additional File 3).

Interaction between GRS and dietary intake on newborn anthropometry outcomes

There was a statistically significant interaction between VDR-GRS and carbohydrate intake on birth length outcomes (Pinteraction = 0.032). As shown in Fig. 1, those who were in the highest tertile of carbohydrate intake (mean ± SD: 405 ± 57.16 g/day) and carried ≥ 2 risk alleles gave birth to babies with a significantly lower birth length compared to babies from mothers carrying < 2 risk alleles (p = 0.008). None of the other interactions on newborn anthropometry outcomes was statistically significant (Table 3).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Interaction between the VDR-GRS and dietary carbohydrate intake (g) on birth length (cm) (Pinteraction = 0.032). Mothers who were in the highest tertile of carbohydrate intake and carried ≥ 2 risk alleles gave birth to babies with significantly lower birth length (p = 0.008)

Full size image
Table 3 Interaction between GRSs and T3 dietary intake on newborn anthropometry outcomes
Full size table

Discussion

The current study is the first to investigate the interaction of maternal genetic susceptibility with dietary factors on maternal vitamin D and IGF-1 levels, and newborn anthropometric measurements in South East Asia. Using a genetic approach, our study has shown evidence for a novel interaction between VDR-GRS and carbohydrate intake on birth length outcomes, where mothers with higher VDR risk alleles and high carbohydrate consumption (339–581 g/day) gave birth to babies with lower birth length. The mean carbohydrate intake for the highest tertile was above the level stipulated in the Indonesian dietary guidelines [45]. Hence, these findings may have a significant public health implication in terms of improving newborn anthropometric measurements such as birth length by developing dietary intervention strategies to reduce carbohydrate intake for those who have higher vitamin D-related genetic risks.

Our study found an association between vitamin D status and IGF-1 levels but no significant association between IGF-1 levels and newborn anthropometric measurements and interaction of GRS with 25(OH)D, and IGF-1 on newborn anthropometric measurements, respectively, were observed. Our study findings are in accordance with other studies [12, 46]. A study of 241 healthy individuals also demonstrated a positive correlation between serum 25(OH)D and IGF-1 levels [11]. Previous studies have shown that IGF-1 stimulates the activity of enzyme 1α-hydroxylase, which has been shown to control the renal production of the active form of vitamin D [calcitriol or 1,25(OH)D] [47]. A previous intervention study in an Italian adult population showed that vitamin D supplementation increases the production of IGF-1 levels [12]. These results suggest that the association between vitamin D and foetal growth might depend on the effect of vitamin D on IGF-1 during pregnancy.

Even though GRS was not associated with newborn anthropometry, there was an interaction of VDR-GRS with carbohydrate intake on birth length. Those who consumed a high-carbohydrate diet and had higher risk alleles of vitamin D deficiency gave birth to babies with significantly lower birth lengths than those babies born to mothers with lower risk alleles. The average carbohydrate intake for the pregnant mothers in the highest tertile was 405.88 ± 57.16 g/day, which is above the Indonesian dietary recommendation [45, 48] of up to 360–400 g/day or equal to 50–60% of total energy percentage during the third trimester of pregnancy. A review of studies [48] from Hatriyanti et al. showed that no studies identified a deficiency in fat or carbohydrate intake for Indonesian pregnant mothers; in contrast, they mostly consume high amounts of dietary carbohydrates and fat during pregnancy. The Minangkabau Indonesia Study on Nutrition and Genetics (MINANG) also demonstrated that in the dietary intake of Indonesian Minangkabau women [19], more than 70% of the daily energy requirement was obtained from carbohydrates. This is not surprising because Indonesian people generally consume rice as a staple food and hence carbohydrate is the main source of energy during pregnancy [49]. Excess macronutrient intake, including high carbohydrate consumption during pregnancy, can increase maternal blood glucose levels and lead to pregnancy outcomes such as macrosomia [50].

The nutritional status of pregnant mothers is an important determinant in maintaining maternal health, such as preventing intrauterine growth restriction and neonatal size [51]. During pregnancy, vitamin D has been shown to be crucial for the development of the foetal skeletal system, immune system and tooth formation, along with the general growth of the foetus [21]. A study among West Javanese pregnant mothers revealed a negative association between low levels of vitamin D during pregnancy and SGA [52]. The prevalence of vitamin D deficiency has been reported to exceed 95% in the North Sumatra population [53] and 90% among pregnant mothers living in Jakarta [54, 55]. These studies demonstrate the fact that maternal vitamin D deficiency may be related to adverse pregnancy outcomes as well as newborn anthropometry. However, the results have been conflicting due to the small sample size in some studies, cross-sectional study design, lack of adjustment for seasonal variation, ethnicity, differences in study design in terms of the trimester (1st, 2nd or 3rd trimester), and the different cut-off points for categorising vitamin D status. Such inconsistencies highlight the need for large prospective and intervention studies to examine these causal associations.

Our study has been the first to investigate the interaction between maternal genetic susceptibility and dietary factors on newborn anthropometry in Indonesia. No published research exists on the interaction between vitamin D pathway-related SNPs and dietary factors on newborn anthropometry in Indonesia, although there have been limited studies in other countries. A study from a Japanese cohort comprising 78,793 paired mothers and their singleton offspring found that increased maternal carbohydrate intake was causally associated with increased birth length; however, the study did not explore the genetic susceptibility of the pregnant mothers [56]. In contrast, our study has shown that mothers with high carbohydrate intake gave birth to babies with lower birth length if they had a high VDR-GRS compared to mothers with a low VDR-GRS. While the relationship between VDR and foetal outcomes such as newborn anthropometry remains unclear, the role of VDR in normal and abnormal pregnancy conditions such as preeclampsia, foetal growth restriction, gestational diabetes and preterm birth have been reported in previous studies [57,58,59]. In addition, a recent meta-analysis [38] in 615 pregnant mothers showed that VDR genetic polymorphisms may play an important role in neonatal anthropometry via innate immunity and implantation, thereby suggesting that VDR could be a key factor in foetal growth and newborn anthropometry outcomes, making it a strong candidate gene for our study.

The mechanism by which carbohydrates interact with vitamin D pathway-related SNPs and affect newborn anthropometry, such as birth length outcome, is unclear and requires further investigation. The interaction of VDR-GRS with dietary carbohydrate intake during pregnancy on newborn anthropometry that was observed in our study is biologically plausible, given that vitamin D has been shown to regulate the development of metabolic diseases through its action on the metabolism of carbohydrates and its role in insulin secretion and sensitivity [60]. During pregnancy, the consumption of a high-carbohydrate diet can lead to excess glucose which is stored either as glycogen or converted into fatty acids and stored as fat in adipose tissue [61]. On the one hand, an excess of adipose tissue leads to its deposition and a decrease in vitamin D bioavailability; on the other hand, vitamin D deficiency in obesity affects the pathogenetic mechanisms associated with impaired tissue sensitivity to insulin and systemic inflammatory responses, promoting the development of insulin resistance and DM during pregnancy [62]. In addition, VDR and vitamin D-metabolising enzymes have been found to be strongly expressed in pancreatic beta cells and insulin-responsive cells such as adipocytes [63]. The polymorphisms of VDR may be associated with insulin resistance, which may lead to the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) [64]. While a few studies have demonstrated a link between GDM and foetal macrosomia [65, 66], a recent meta-analysis found that specific patterns of VDR polymorphisms influence birth weight and other anthropometric neonatal outcomes [38]. High-risk alleles of vitamin D deficiency due to genetic susceptibility may lead to pregnancy complications and affect pregnancy outcomes such as lower birth length in the presence of a high-carbohydrate diet. An understanding of the genetic variants will yield positive results based on the implementation of personalised nutrition to prevent adverse pregnancy outcomes and maintain a balanced diet during pregnancy. Furthermore, future larger studies are required to confirm this finding.

The strengths of the current study include being the first nutrigenetic approach to determine the interaction between genetic variations and dietary factors on newborn anthropometry measurements among Minangkabau women. The construction of the GRSs, as opposed to a single SNP approach, improved the statistical ability to analyse the gene–nutrient interactions. Furthermore, we used a comprehensive, validated SQ-FFQ, which in turn enhanced the accuracy of the dietary data collection. In addition, the exposures examined in our study were collected by well-trained staff who followed validated and standard operating procedures. However, this study also has limitations that should be acknowledged. The main limitation of this study was its small sample size; however, the study was able to demonstrate significant associations and interactions. Although we used a validated SQ-FFQ, it is impossible to rule out bias due to the self-reported nature of the dietary intake information. The present study had no data on the specific categories of foods consumed during the dietary intake data collection, notably on the quantification of different types of carbohydrates into complex, simple and monosaccharides. The study participants were not screened for GDM and hence this could be a confounder in our study. Furthermore, the serum levels of 25(OH)D concentration were not measured by the liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry assay, which has been demonstrated to be the gold standard technique for the measurement of vitamin D metabolites. Finally, the study findings were limited to pregnant mothers among the Minangkabau people and thus cannot be generalised to the whole Indonesian population.

Conclusions

The present study has demonstrated a novel interaction between VDR-GRS and carbohydrate intake on birth length outcomes among Indonesian pregnant Minangkabau mothers where individuals with a higher genetic risk of low vitamin D concentration and higher consumption of carbohydrates gave birth to babies with lower birth length. These findings are relevant for public health as they suggest the need for intervention to reduce the carbohydrate intake of Indonesian pregnant mothers given that a third of our study participants had a mean carbohydrate intake of ~ 405 g/day. This is equivalent to 66.48% of daily carbohydrate intake, based on the average carbohydrate intake (i.e. 2,441 kcal/day) in our study population, which exceeded the Indonesian dietary guidelines for pregnant mothers. During the third trimester, carbohydrates should account for 50–60% of daily total energy, which includes approximately 6–9 servings of whole grains daily [45]. Future studies with larger sample sizes and objective measures of carbohydrate intake, such as the type of carbohydrate, are needed to confirm these findings, which may be useful in establishing dietary interventions to overcome the genetic susceptibility of vitamin D deficiency and improve newborn outcomes.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due additional results from the study are yet to be published but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

IGF-1:

Insulin-like growth factor 1

VDPM:

Vitamin D of pregnant mothers

MINANG:

Minangkabau Indonesia study on nutrition and genetics

SNPs:

Single nucleotide polymorphisms

GWAS:

Genome-wide Association Studies

HWE:

Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium

GRS:

Genetic risk score

DHCR7:

7-Dehydrocholesterol reductase

CYP2R1:

Cytochrome P450 Family 2

GC:

Vitamin D binding protein

CYP24A1:

Cytochrome P450 Family 24

VDR:

Vitamin D receptor

25(OH)D:

25-Hydroxyvitamin D

1,25(OH)D:

1α,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D

BMI:

Body mass index

GA:

Gestational age

SGA:

Small-for-gestational-age

T1:

First trimester

T3:

Third trimester

PTB:

Preterm birth

References

  1. WHO, UNICEF, World Bank, and United Nation DESA Population Division. United Nations Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation. Geneva: The World Bank; 2020.

  2. World Health Organization. Neonatal and Perinatal Mortality: Country, Regional and Global Estimates. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017.

  3. Titaley CR, Dibley MJ, Agho K, Roberts CL, Hall J. Determinants of neonatal mortality in Indonesia. BMC Public Health. 2008;8:232. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-8-232.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Grissa O, Yessoufou A, Mrisak I, Hichami A, Amoussou-Guenou D, Grissa A, et al. Growth factor concentrations and their placental mRNA expression are modulated in gestational diabetes mellitus: possible interactions with macrosomia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010;10:7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-10-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Holick MF. Vitamin D Deficiency. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:266–81. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra070553.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hamilton B, Grantham J, Racinais S, Chalabi H. Vitamin D deficiency is endemic in Middle Eastern sportsmen. Public Health Nutr. 2010;13:1528–34. https://doi.org/10.1017/S136898000999320X.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. van Schoor NM, Lips P. Worldwide vitamin D status. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;25:671–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beem.2011.06.007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Holick MF, Chen TC. Vitamin D deficiency: a worldwide problem with health consequences. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;87:1080S-S1086.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Nimitphong H, Holick MF. Vitamin D status and sun exposure in southeast Asia. Dermatoendocrinol. 2013;5:34–7. https://doi.org/10.4161/derm.24054.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Christesen HT, Falkenberg T, Lamont RF, Jørgensen JS. The impact of vitamin D on pregnancy: a systematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012;91:1357–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12000.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bogazzi F, Rossi G, Lombardi M, Tomisti L, Sardella C, Manetti L, et al. Vitamin D status may contribute to serum insulin-like growth factor I concentrations in healthy subjects. J Endocrinol Invest. 2011;34:e200-203. https://doi.org/10.3275/7228.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ameri P, Giusti A, Boschetti M, Bovio M, Teti C, Leoncini G, et al. Vitamin D increases circulating IGF1 in adults: potential implication for the treatment of GH deficiency. Eur J Endocrinol. 2013;169:767–72. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-13-0510.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Thomas GJ, Peverini A, Smithuis F, Fabbro D, Tkatch J, Rosmino J, et al. MON-283 IGF-1 Levels During Normal Pregnancy. J Endocrine Society. 2020;4:MON-283. https://doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvaa046.1152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yang M-J. Changes in maternal serum insulin-like growth factor-1 during pregnancy and its relationship to maternal anthropometry. J Chin Med Assoc. 2014;77:218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcma.2014.03.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Åsvold BO, Eskild A, Jenum PA, Vatten LJ. Maternal Concentrations of Insulin-like Growth Factor I and Insulin-like Growth Factor Binding Protein 1 During Pregnancy and Birth Weight of Offspring. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;174:129–35. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwr067.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hyppönen E, Boucher BJ, Berry DJ, Power C. 25-hydroxyvitamin D, IGF-1, and metabolic syndrome at 45 years of age: a cross-sectional study in the 1958 British Birth Cohort. Diabetes. 2008;57:298–305. https://doi.org/10.2337/db07-1122.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Forouhi NG, Luan J, Cooper A, Boucher BJ, Wareham NJ. Baseline Serum 25-Hydroxy Vitamin D Is Predictive of Future Glycemic Status and Insulin Resistance. Diabetes. 2008;57:2619–25. https://doi.org/10.2337/db08-0593.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Aji AS, Erwinda E, Rasyid R, Yusrawati Y, Malik SG, Alathari B, et al. A genetic approach to study the relationship between maternal Vitamin D status and newborn anthropometry measurements: the Vitamin D pregnant mother (VDPM) cohort study. J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2020;19:91–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40200-019-00480-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Alathari BE, Aji AS, Ariyasra U, Sari SR, Tasrif N, Yani FF, et al. Interaction between Vitamin D-Related Genetic Risk Score and Carbohydrate Intake on Body Fat Composition: A Study in Southeast Asian Minangkabau Women. Nutrients. 2021;13:326. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13020326.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Aji AS, Yusrawati Y, Malik SG, Lipoeto NI. The Association between Vitamin D-Related Gene Polymorphisms and Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Concentration: A Prospective Cohort Study in Pregnant Minangkabau Women, Indonesia. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo). 2020;66:S295-303. https://doi.org/10.3177/jnsv.66.S295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Aji AS, Erwinda E, Yusrawati Y, Malik SG, Lipoeto NI. Vitamin D deficiency status and its related risk factors during early pregnancy: a cross-sectional study of pregnant Minangkabau women, Indonesia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19:183. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2341-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Aji AS, Desmawati D, Yerizel E, Lipoeto NI. The association between lifestyle and maternal vitamin D levels during pregnancy in West Sumatra, Indonesia. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2018;27:1286–93. https://doi.org/10.6133/apjcn.201811_27(6).0016.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Putri NI, Lipoeto NI, Rita RS, Aji AS. Analysis of the association between maternal 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and newborn birthweight in Tanah Datar and Solok Districts, West Sumatra, Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi. 2019;19:61–4. https://doi.org/10.33087/jiubj.v19i1.546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dina Keumala Sari, Zaimah Zulkarnaini Tala, Sri Lestari, Sunna Vyatra Hutagalung, Ratna Akbari Ganie. Vitamin D Receptor Gene Polymorphism Among Indonesian Women in North Sumatera. Asian J Clin Nutr. 2017;9:44–50. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajcn.2017.44.50.

  25. Aji AS, Yusrawati Y, Malik SG, Lipoeto NI. The Association of Maternal Vitamin D Status during Pregnancy and Neonatal Anthropometric Measurements: A Longitudinal Study in Minangkabau Pregnant Women, Indonesia. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol. 2020;66:S63-70. https://doi.org/10.3177/jnsv.66.S63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Aji AS, Yerizel E, Desmawati D, Lipoeto NI. Low Maternal Vitamin D and Calcium Food Intake during Pregnancy Associated with Place of Residence: A Cross-Sectional Study in West Sumatran Women, Indonesia. Open Access Macedonian J Med Sci. 2019;7:2879–85. https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2019.659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lipoeto NI, Aji AS, Faradila F, Ayudia F, Sukma NP. Maternal vitamin D intake and serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels associated with blood pressure: A cross-sectional study in Padang, West Sumatra. MJN. 2018;24:407–15.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Aji AS, Lipoeto NI. Vitamin D in Pregnancy. ARGIPA. 2016;1:73–90.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Francis EC, Hinkle SN, Song Y, Rawal S, Donnelly SR, Zhu Y, et al. Longitudinal Maternal Vitamin D Status during Pregnancy Is Associated with Neonatal Anthropometric Measures. Nutrients. 2018;10. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10111631.

  30. Alathari BE, Sabta AA, Kalpana CA, Vimaleswaran KS. Vitamin D pathway-related gene polymorphisms and their association with metabolic diseases: A literature review. J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40200-020-00561-w.

  31. Aji AS, Putri DALK, Lipoeto NI. Association Between Maternal Pre-pregnancy Body Mass Index, Dietary Intake, and Birth Size Outcomes: Results From the VDPM Cohort Study in Indonesia. Curr Dev Nutr. 2021;5:706–706. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzab046_003.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Aji AS, Yusrawati Y, Malik SG, Lipoeto NI. Pre-Pregnancy maternal nutritional status and physical activity levels during pregnancy associated with birth size outcomes in Minangkabau women, Indonesia. Curr Dev Nutr. 2020;4:931–931. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzaa054_003.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Susanto I, Lipoeto NI, Aji AS. Factors associated with rates of gestational weight gain among pregnant women in West Sumatera, Indonesia. Curr Dev Nutr. 2021;5:821–821. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzab046_118.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Putri DALK, Lipoeto NI, Aji AS. Interaction Between Pre-pregnancy Body Mass Index and Gestational Weight Gain to Newborn Outcomes: Results From the VDPM Cohort Study in Indonesia. Curr Dev Nutr. 2021;5:770–770. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzab046_067.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Classification of Overweight and Obesity by BMI, Waist Circumference, and Associated Disease Risks 2012. https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/educational/lose_wt/BMI/bmi_dis.htm (accessed 4 Feb 2019).

  36. Rosenfeld T, Salem H, Altarescu G, Grisaru-Granovsky S, Tevet A, Birk R. Maternal-fetal vitamin D receptor polymorphisms significantly associated with preterm birth. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;296:215–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4412-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Swamy GK, Garrett ME, Miranda ML, Ashley-Koch AE. Maternal Vitamin D Receptor Genetic Variation Contributes to Infant Birthweight among Black Mothers. Am J Med Genet A. 2011;155:1264–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.33583.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Barchitta M, Maugeri A, La Rosa MC, Magnano San Lio R, Favara G, Panella M, et al. Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in Vitamin D Receptor Gene Affect Birth Weight and the Risk of Preterm Birth: Results From the “Mamma & Bambino” Cohort and A Meta-Analysis. Nutrients. 2018;10. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10091172.

  39. Ahn J, Yu K, Stolzenberg-Solomon R, Simon KC, McCullough ML, Gallicchio L, et al. Genome-wide association study of circulating vitamin D levels. Hum Mol Genet. 2010;19:2739–45. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddq155.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Wang TJ. Common genetic determinants of vitamin D insufficiency: a genome-wide association study. The Lancet. 2010;376:180–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60588-0.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Berry DJ, Vimaleswaran KS, Whittaker JC, Hingorani AD, Hyppönen E. Evaluation of genetic markers as instruments for Mendelian randomization studies on vitamin D. PLoS One. 2012;7:e37465. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037465.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Barry EL, Rees JR, Peacock JL, Mott LA, Amos CI, Bostick RM, et al. Genetic variants in CYP2R1, CYP24A1, and VDR modify the efficacy of vitamin D3 supplementation for increasing serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99:E2133-2137. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2014-1389.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. World Health Organization. Who Child Growth Standards: Head Circumference-for-age, Arm Circumference-for-age, Triceps Skinfold-for-age and Subscapular Skinfold-for-age. Geneva: WHO; 2007.

  44. WHO. The Asia-Pacific perspective : redefining obesity and its treatment. Sydney : Health Communications Australia; 2000.

  45. Ministry of Health Republic of Indonesia. The Indonesian Dietary Recommendation (AKG -Angka Kecukupan Gizi). Jakarta: Ministry of Health Republic of Indonesia; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Trummer C, Schwetz V, Pandis M, Grübler MR, Verheyen N, Gaksch M, et al. Effects of Vitamin D Supplementation on IGF-1 and Calcitriol: A Randomized-Controlled Trial. Nutrients. 2017;9. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu9060623.

  47. Marcus R, Butterfield G, Holloway L, Gilliland L, Baylink DJ, Hintz RL, et al. Effects of short term administration of recombinant human growth hormone to elderly people. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1990;70:519–27. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem-70-2-519.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Hartriyanti Y, Suyoto PST, Muhammad HFL, Palupi IR. Nutrient intake of pregnant women in Indonesia: a review. Malays J Nutr. 2012;18:113–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Winasandis BF, Tamtomo D, Anantanyu S. Associations between Maternal Nutritional Status, Carbohydrate, Fat, and Protein Intakes, and Low Birth Weight in Jember, East Java. J Matern Child Health. 2020;5:1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Mckenzie KM, Dissanayake HU, McMullan R, Caterson ID, Celermajer DS, Gordon A, et al. Quantity and Quality of Carbohydrate Intake during Pregnancy, Newborn Body Fatness and Cardiac Autonomic Control: Conferred Cardiovascular Risk? Nutrients. 2017;9:1375. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu9121375.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Sweeting A, Mijatovic J, Brinkworth GD, Markovic TP, Ross GP, Brand-Miller J, et al. The Carbohydrate Threshold in Pregnancy and Gestational Diabetes: How Low Can We Go? Nutrients. 2021;13:2599. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13082599.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Irianti S, Judistiani RTD, Rachmayati S, Effendi JS, Setiabudiawan B. Relationship between Maternal Vitamin D Level and Small for Gestational Age Infant in West Java, Indonesia. Majalah Kedokteran Bandung. 2020;52:180–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Sari DK, Damanik HA, Lipoeto NI, Lubis Z. Is Micro Evolution in Tropical Country Women Resulting Low 25(OH)D Level?: A Cross Sectional Study in Indonesia. J Nutr Food Sci. 2013;4. https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9600.1000246.

  54. Wibowo N, Bardosono S, Irwinda R, Syafitri I, Putri AS, Prameswari N. Assessment of the nutrient intake and micronutrient status in the first trimester of pregnant women in Jakarta. Med J Indonesia. 2017;26:109–15. https://doi.org/10.13181/mji.v26i2.1617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Bardosono S. Maternal Micronutrient Deficiency during the First Trimester among Indonesian Pregnant Women Living in Jakarta. EJournal Kedokteran Indonesia 2016:76–81. https://doi.org/10.23886/ejki.4.6281.76-81.

  56. Eshak ES, Okada C, Baba S, Kimura T, Ikehara S, Sato T, et al. Maternal total energy, macronutrient and vitamin intakes during pregnancy associated with the offspring’s birth size in the Japan Environment and Children’s Study. Br J Nutr. 2020;124:558–66. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114520001397.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Knabl J, Vattai A, Ye Y, Jueckstock J, Hutter S, Kainer F, et al. Role of placental VDR expression and function in common late pregnancy disorders. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18:2340. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18112340.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Apaydın M, Beysel S, Eyerci N, Pinarli FA, Ulubay M, Kizilgul M, et al. The VDR gene FokI polymorphism is associated with gestational diabetes mellitus in Turkish women. BMC Med Genet. 2019;20:82. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12881-019-0820-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Rahmannezhad G, Mashayekhi FJ, Goodarzi MT, Rezvanfar MR, Sadeghi A. Association between vitamin D receptor ApaI and TaqI gene polymorphisms and gestational diabetes mellitus in an Iranian pregnant women population. Gene. 2016;581:43–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2016.01.026.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Szymczak-Pajor I, Śliwińska A. Analysis of Association between Vitamin D Deficiency and Insulin Resistance. Nutrients. 2019;11:794. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11040794.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Hantzidiamantis PJ, Lappin SL. Physiology, Glucose. StatPearls, Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Wimalawansa SJ. Associations of vitamin D with insulin resistance, obesity, type 2 diabetes, and metabolic syndrome. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2018;175:177–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsbmb.2016.09.017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Wang Y, Zhu J, DeLuca HF. Where is the vitamin D receptor? Arch Biochem Biophys. 2012;523:123–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abb.2012.04.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Zhou Q, Wen S, Liu M, Zhang S, Jin X, Liu A. Association between Gene Polymorphisms of Vitamin D Receptor and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18:205. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010205.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Mohammadbeigi A, Farhadifar F, Soufizadeh N, Mohammadsalehi N, Rezaiee M, Aghaei M. Fetal Macrosomia: Risk Factors, Maternal, and Perinatal Outcome. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2013;3:546–50. https://doi.org/10.4103/2141-9248.122098.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Tabrizi R, Asemi Z, Lankarani KB, Akbari M, Khatibi SR, Naghibzadeh-Tahami A, et al. Gestational diabetes mellitus in association with macrosomia in Iran: a meta-analysis. J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2019;18:41–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40200-019-00388-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the participation of the volunteers, nutrition students, research assistants, biomedical laboratory assistant, and field data enumerator for their support in this study. We appreciate all the subjects for their cooperation and support of this study. Special thanks are also due to all the midwives at the maternal clinics in Payakumbuh, Padang, Lima Puluh Kota, Pariaman, and Padang Pariaman.

Funding

This research was funded by Directorate General of Higher Education Ministry of Na-tional Education (KEMENRISTEK DIKTI), Indonesia, with project name The Research of Master Program Leading to Doctoral Degree for Excellent Students (PMDSU Batch-2) in the year of 2018, and Indonesian Danone Institute Foundation (Grant No: 007/ROG-D/IDIF/X2016). This joint publication program, Universitas Alma Ata and the University of Reading was awarded by the World Class Professor (WCP) grant (Grant No: 2817/E4.1/KK.04.05/2021) from the Indonesia Endowment Fund for Education, the Ministry of Finance, and the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology in the year of 2021. The views expressed herein are those of the individual authors and do not necessarily reflect those of Indonesian Danone Institute Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Nutrition, Faculty of Health Sciences, Alma Ata University, Bantul, 55183, Indonesia

    Arif Sabta Aji

  2. Graduate School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Alma Ata University, Bantul, 55183, Indonesia

    Arif Sabta Aji, Isman Susanto, Siti Nurunniyah, Wahyuningsih Wahyuningsih & Nur Mukhlishoh Majidah

  3. Department of Nutrition, Faculty of Medicine, Andalas University, Padang, 25127, Indonesia

    Nur Indrawaty Lipoeto

  4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Andalas University, Padang, 25127, Indonesia

    Yusrawati Yusrawati

  5. Eijkman Institute for Molecular Biology, Jakarta, 10430, Indonesia

    Safarina G. Malik

  6. Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

    Nur Aini Kusmayanti & Ratih Devi Alfiana

  7. Department of Midwifery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Alma Ata University, Bantul, 55183, Indonesia

    Siti Nurunniyah

  8. Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Alma Ata University, Bantul, 55183, Indonesia

    Wahyuningsih Wahyuningsih

  9. Department of Food and Nutritional Sciences, Hugh Sinclair Unit of Human Nutrition, University of Reading, Reading, UK

    Karani Santhanakrishnan Vimaleswaran

  10. Institute for Food, Nutrition, and Health, University of Reading, Reading, UK

    Karani Santhanakrishnan Vimaleswaran

Authors
  1. Arif Sabta Aji
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nur Indrawaty Lipoeto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yusrawati Yusrawati
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Safarina G. Malik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Nur Aini Kusmayanti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Isman Susanto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Siti Nurunniyah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Ratih Devi Alfiana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Wahyuningsih Wahyuningsih
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Nur Mukhlishoh Majidah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Karani Santhanakrishnan Vimaleswaran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

ASA carried out data collection and statistical analysis; ASA and KSV interpreted the data and drafted the manuscript; KSV, NIL, YY, and SGM conceived, designed and supervised the study; NAK, RDA, NMM, WW, SN and IS helped revise the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karani Santhanakrishnan Vimaleswaran.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was conducted in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committees of Medical Faculty, Andalas University (No. 262/KEP/FK/2016). All women provided written informed consent prior to the start of the data collection.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aji, A.S., Lipoeto, N.I., Yusrawati, Y. et al. Impact of maternal dietary carbohydrate intake and vitamin D-related genetic risk score on birth length: the Vitamin D Pregnant Mother (VDPM) cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 22, 690 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-05020-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-05020-3

Keywords

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

ISSN: 1471-2393

Contact us