Skip to main content

Coverage and factors associated with mother and newborn skin-to-skin contact in Nigeria: a multilevel analysis

Abstract

Background

Mother and newborn skin-to-skin contact (SSC) is an immediate postpartum intervention known to improve the health of newborn and mothers alike. Albeit, there is paucity of data that explored the coverage or factors associated with SSC in Nigeria. Therefore, we aimed to explore the coverage and hierarchical nature of the factors associated with SSC among women of reproductive age in Nigeria.

Methods

The 2018 Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey (NDHS) data was used for this study. Data on 29,992 women who had ever given birth were extracted for analysis. SSC was the outcome variable as determined by women’s report. A multivariable multilevel logistic regression model was used to estimate the fixed and random effects of the factors associated with SSC. Statistical significance was determined at p< 0.05.

Results

The coverage of SSC was approximately 12.0%. Educated women had higher odds of SSC, when compared with women with no formal education. Those who delivered through caesarean section (CS) had 88% reduction in SSC, when compared with women who had vaginal delivery (OR= 0.12; 95%CI: 0.07, 0.22). Women who delivered at health facility were 15.58 times as likely to practice SSC, when compared with those who delivered at home (OR= 15.58; 95%CI: 10.64, 22.82). Adequate ANC visits and low birth weight significantly increased the odds of SSC. Women from richest household were 1.70 times as likely to practice SSC, when compared with women from poorest household (OR= 1.70; 95%CI: 1.04, 2.79). There was 65% reduction in SSC among women with high rate of community non-use of media, when compared with women from low rate of community non-use of media (OR= 0.35; 95%CI: 0.20, 0.61).

Conclusion

SSC coverage was low in Nigeria. Moreover, individual, household and community level factors were associated with SSC. More enlightenment should be created among women to bring to limelight the importance of SSC specifically to newborn’s health.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Globally, about 2.5 million newborn die in their first month of life, accounting for 47% of under-five death [1]. Although, there has been a 50% reduction in the number of neonatal death from 5 million in 1990 to 2.5 million in 2018, still, the decrease in neonatal death has been slow, when compared to the overall reduction in post-neonatal death among the under-five [1]. Several causes have been attributed to childhood death [2]. SSC is a recommended natural intervention for improving neonatal survival rates. It is a component of thermal care, in the light of drying, wrapping and delayed bathing. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that after delivery, every newborn should receive immediate newborn care, which includes thermal care, hygienic cord care and early initiation of breastfeeding [3]. Therefore, physiological stability, thermoregulation, blood glucose, early breastfeeding initiation could be higher in newborns exposed to SSC. Moreover, SSC is beneficial to mothers with postpartum depressive symptoms as it reduces maternal anxiety and enhances bonding and caregiving behaviour towards the newborn [4]. In prematurity, SSC can improve survival by providing warmth, love, stimulation and protection from nosocomial sepsis. In resource-poor settings, this can be life-saving as there is often lack of expertise or technology to effectively manage complications [5].

Similarly, SSC has been known as a safe substitute to reduce neonatal mortality in resource-poor settings [6]. However, despite the overwhelming evidence that supports the benefits of SSC, its uptake and adoption continues to be low [7]. Numerous factors have militated against improved practice of SSC. For instance, healthcare workforce shortages, closed-mindedness, safety concerns, interruptions from other healthcare practitioners on medical procedures for infant or mother are some of the notable barriers to practice SSC [8]. Conversely, some enabling factors to SSC include improved healthcare providers’ knowledge on the benefits of SSC, positive experiences of the effect of SSC on the mother and newborn and women’s acceptance or willingness which are commonly influenced by cultural, educational, religious background amongst others [8].

The health care system of any setting has a role to play on the implementation of practices recommended for positive health outcomes. Unfortunately, Nigeria has a weak health care delivery system that contributes to adverse maternal and child health outcomes [9]. Promoting institutional delivery could in turn increase the practice of SSC due to the fact that skilled birth attendants could have the knowledge of SSC. A major limitation to that assertion is the health delivery system in Nigeria is inadequately funded [10], to provide proper training and on-the-job training of health workers in the delivery of modern practices including maternal health care delivery. No doubt, this has largely favoured home deliveries with traditional birth attendants. This is evident in the average national indices of maternal and child health care, particularly under-utilisation of vital maternal health care services such as skilled care delivery which is among the poorest in sub-Saharan Africa [11]. The Integrated Maternal, Newborn and Child Health (IMNCH) Strategy currently being implemented in the country seeks to boost utilisation of essential maternal and child health services across the continuum of care [11]. Nevertheless, the coverage of the IMNCH interventions is remains low particularly in hard-to-reach areas of the country [12].

With efforts to meet the targets of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by 2030, to reduce neonatal mortality to as low as 12 per 1000 live births [13], it is crucial to incorporate all proven measures aimed at reducing neonatal mortality and improving newborn’s health into health care programmes. Hence, to effectively scale-up SSC as an intervention to reduce neonatal mortality in Nigeria, it is necessary to understand the determinants of practise or non-practise of SSC [14]. In this novel study, we aimed to explore the practice and factors associated with SSC in Nigeria using the most recent NDHS data.

Methods

Data source

In this analysis, we used cross-sectional, nationally representative data. For study, NDHS 2018 data was collected from 29,992 women who had ever given birth. A three-stage sampling stratification was involved in the sampling design, in which respondents were first stratified by urban versus rural dwellings, then randomly selected enumeration areas (EAs) within each stratum. Finally, using equal likelihood sampling, households within each EA were then chosen for the survey. In the calculation of survey weights, this three-stage sampling procedure was taken into account and applied to ensure the representativeness of the sample with respect to the general population. Data for this analysis is obtained from the questionnaire of individual women. The data is available in the public domain and accessed at; http://dhsprogram.com/data/available-datasets.cfm. Details of DHS sampling procedure has been reported previously [15].

Variables of the study

Outcome

Mother and newborn skin-to-skin contact was derived from the question; “Was child put on mother's chest and bare skin after birth”. This was measured dichotomously and coded as “1” if a woman answered “yes” and “0” if otherwise.

Individual-level factors

  • Maternal age: 15-19, 20-24, 25-29, 30-34, 35-39, 40-44, 45-49.

  • Residential mobility: internal immigrant (if a respondent has lived less than 5 years in the current location) vs. indigenous (if a respondent has lived up to 5 years and above in the current location).

  • Educational achievement: no formal schooling, primary and secondary or higher education.

  • Religion: Christianity, Islam and the Traditions of Africa.

  • Media exposure: was measured dichotomously (yes vs. no) whether a respondent used any newspaper/magazine, radio, TV or internet; Number of children ever born: 1-2, 3-4 and over 4 children.

  • Child wanted while pregnant: then, later and no longer wanted.

  • Health insurance: protected vs. not covered.

  • Job status: working vs. not working.

  • Childbirth mode: caesarean vs. vaginal.

  • Location of delivery: health facility vs. home.

  • ANC visits: no visit, 1-3, 4 and above.

  • Type of birth: singleton vs. multiple.

  • Sex of child: male vs. female.

  • Preceding birth interval: <2years, 2-3years, >3-4years, >4years, firstborn.

  • Birth weight: low birth weight (<2.5kg) vs. average (≥2.5kg). These factors were included based on previous studies which examined the factors associated with SSC [16,17,18,19].

Household-level factors

The size of the household was based on the total number of individuals residing together; 1-4, 5-8 and over 8 individuals. Household wealth quintile: To assign the wealth indicator weights, Principal Components Analysis (PCA) was used. This protocol assigned scores and standardized variables for the wealth predictor, such as; Main wall material, main roof material, sanitation facilities, water supply, radio, television, electricity, refrigerator, cooking fuel, furniture, number of people per room, bicycle, motorcycle/scooter, car/truck, main floor material, main wall material. Scores of the factor coefficient (factor loadings) and z-scores were determined. The indicator values have been multiplied by the loadings for each household and summed to produce the household’s wealth index value. The standardized z-score was used to disentangle the overall assigned scores to poorest, poorer, middle, richer and richest class [20, 21].

Community-level factors

Residential status: urban vs. rural. Geographical area: North Central, North East, South East, South South and South West, North East, North West. Non-exposure media concentration in the group (whether or not more than 50 percent of the cluster population does not read newspapers/magazines, do not listen to radio, watch TV or do not use the internet). Uneducated women's concentration in the community (whether or not more than 50 percent pop of the cluster had no formal education). Poverty concentration in the society (whether or not more than 50 percent of the population are in the least wealth quintiles). This approach is similar to the methods of a previous study [22].

Ethical consideration

In this analysis, with all identifier information removed, we used population-based secondary datasets available in the public/online domain. Access was given to the authors by MEASURE DHS/ICF International to use the data. The DHS complies with requirements to ensure the security of the privacy of respondents. ICF International makes sure the survey is consistent with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services regulations for the respect of human subjects. No further approval was required for this study. More details about data and ethical standards are available at http://goo.gl/ny8T6X.

Statistical analysis

For data strata, cluster and sample weights, we used the 'svy' module to modify. To estimate the fixed and random effects of the factors associated with SSC, a multivariable multilevel logistic regression model was used. For binary answer, we defined a 3-level model. A single woman (at level 1), a family (at level 2) living in a group (at level 3). We had five models built. To break down the amount of variance between group and household levels, the first model, an empty or unconditional model without any explanatory variables, was defined. In order to understand the variations of the community and households, the null or empty model is important and we used it as a guide to estimate how many household and community variables were able to explain the observed variation. Furthermore, we used it to explain the use of the multilevel statistical method, since it recommended the use of single-level logistic regression if the population variance was not important in the empty model. Statistical significance was determined at p< 0.05. Data analysis was conducted using Stata Version 14 (StataCorp., College Station, TX, USA).

Fixed and random effects

The results of fixed effects (association measures) with a 95 percent confidence interval were reported as adjusted odds ratios (AORs) (CI). The Intra-class Correlation (ICC) and Median Odds Ratio (MOR) [23] evaluated the possible contextual effects. We calculated the resemblance between respondents using ICC in the same household and within the same group. The ICC reflects the proportion of the total variance in the likelihood of SSC that is connected to the level of the household and society. The MOR calculates the variance of the second or third stage (household or community) as an odds ratio and estimates the likelihood of SSC that can be related to the background of the household and community. Unity MOR does not mean any variance in the household or community variance. The higher the MOR, the more significant the contextual effects for understanding the likelihood of SSC are, on the other hand. The ICC was determined according to the formula used by Snijders and Bosker [24] by the linear threshold, while the MOR is a measure of unknown heterogeneity of clusters. The Bayesian and Akaike Knowledge Criterion is used to assess how well our various models match. A lower value implies a better fit of the model on the Akaike or Bayesian Information Criterion [25].

Results

Background characteristics

Table 1 showed the coverage of SSC was approximately 12.0% among Nigerian women. Based on the results, women with secondary and higher education had SSC coverage of 14.6% and 19.7% respectively. Those of African Tradition Religion (ATR) had 48.9% of SSC coverage. SSC coverage among women who had exposure to media (14.3%), health insurance coverage (17.6%), vaginal delivery (12.2%), delivery at health facility (19.0%), 4+ ANC visits (14.7%), low birthweight (23.0%), living in the richest household (17.2%), urban residence (14.3%), South South geographical region (19.9%), low community non-use of media or poverty (14.3%) and low community illiteracy (15.5%) were also presented respectively.

Table 1 Coverage of SSC across women’s characteristics in Nigeria

Measures of associations

Results from Table 2 showed various models used to examine the hierarchical nature of the factors associated with SSC. In Model II, we examined the individual level factors. Women aged 45-49 years had 53% significant reduction in SSC, when compared with those aged 15-19 years. Those with secondary (OR= 1.33; 95%CI: 1.00, 1.76) and tertiary education (OR= 2.50; 95%CI: 1.68, 3.72) were more likely to have SSC, when compared with women with no formal education. In addition, women who delivered at health facility were 15.59 times as likely to practice SSC, when compared to those who delivered at home (OR= 15.59; 95%CI: 10.41, 23.36). ANC visits and low birth weight significantly increased SSC among Nigerian women. Results from Model III showed that women from higher household wealth quintiles were more likely to practice SSC, when compared with the poorest women. Conversely, women from large household size had significant reduction in SSC, compared with women from small household size. The community level analysis (Model IV) showed that geographical region had significant association with SSC. Furthermore, high level of community non-use of media and illiteracy had 75% (OR= 0.25; 95%CI: 0.15, 0.41) and 52% (OR= 0.48; 95%CI: 0.30, 0.78) significant reduction in SSC, when compared with low level of community non-use of media and illiteracy respectively.

Table 2 Fixed effect of individual-, household- and community-level factors associated with SSC in Nigeria

Results from the full model (Model V) showed women with secondary (OR= 1.41; 95%CI: 1.06, 1.86) and tertiary education (OR= 2.35; 95%CI: 1.57, 3.50) were more likely to have SSC, when compared with women with no formal education. Women who delivered through caesarean section had 88% reduction in SSC, when compared with women who had vaginal delivery (OR= 0.12; 95%CI: 0.07, 0.22). Furthermore, women who delivered at health facility were 15.58 times as likely to practice SSC, when compared to those who delivered at home (OR= 15.58; 95%CI: 10.64, 22.82). ANC visits and low birth weight significantly increased SSC. Women from richest household were 1.70 times as likely to have SSC, when compared with women from poorest household (OR= 1.70; 95%CI: 1.04, 2.79). Geographical region of women was significantly associated with SSC. There was 65% significant reduction in SSC among women from high level community non-use of media, when compared with with women from low level community non-use of media (OR= 0.35; 95%CI: 0.20, 0.61). See Table 2 for the details.

Measures of variations

We presented variance and standard error (SE) for the random effects in Table 3. In Model 1 (unconditional model), there were significant variations in the odds of SSC across communities (σ2 = 2.68; SE= 0.21) and households (σ2= 2.32, SE= 0.27). The variance partition coefficient of 28.0% and 32.9% estimates for the null model implied that variance in the odds of SSC could be attributed to community and household level factors respectively. Results from the Median Odds Ratio also confirmed evidence of community and household-level factors influencing SSC. Based on estimates from the full model (Model V), it was estimated that if a women moved to another community or household with a higher probability of SSC, the median increase in their odds of SSC would be 10.88 and 8.79 fold respectively. The proportional change in variance (PCV), intra-class correlation (ICC) and model fit statistics were also estimated.

Table 3 Random effect estimates of individual-, household- and community-level factors associated with SSC in Nigeria

Discussion

In this study, we explored the coverage, enablers and barriers of SSC in Nigeria, at individual, household and community levels. Based on the findings of the study, the coverage of SSC was low. Furthermore, the mode of delivery, educational attainment, place of delivery, attendance of ANC visits and LBW were significantly associated with SSC. At the household level, women belonging to the richest households were more likely to have SSC. While high rate of community non-use of media and geographical region were significantly associated with SSC at the community level.

The prevalence of SSC was found to be 12%. This is slightly higher than the report from a previous study which showed that only 10% of newborns received SSC [26]. This coverage is still very low despite widespread recommendations from WHO and evidence of proven benefits of SSC both for the mother and the newborn [18, 27, 28]. In the findings from another study using data from low, middle and high income countries, SSC coverage ranged between <1% in Tanzania to 97.8% in Croatia [27]. Nonetheless, there is dearth of empirical studies on SSC in Nigeria, but findings from a qualitative study showed that mothers did not view SSC as important for keeping the baby warm after birth as newborns were physically away from their mothers after birth [29]. Mothers may be less likely to practice SSC if they are not aware of it and/or its benefits [17, 30], or if there are prevailing cultural beliefs and practices that discourage SSC [29,30,31]. Health personnel factors such as lack of personnel and time constraint, lack of awareness of the practice and its benefit may also be barriers to the practice of SSC [16]. These prevailing factors could explain the reasons for low SSC in Nigeria.

An individual-level factor in this study that was strongly associated with the practice of SSC was delivery at a health facility. Women who delivered in a health facility had 15 times higher odds of having SSC immediately after delivery with their newborns. This is consistent with the findings from previous studies which showed that the practice of SSC between the mother and the newborn was significantly more common in health facility based delivery compared with home births [32, 33]. Skilled birth attendants at health facilities may be more knowledgeable about SSC than traditional birth attendants, making it more likely to be practiced in hospital deliveries [34, 35]. Furthermore, the mode of delivery was significantly associated with SSC between mothers and their newborn immediately after birth. Caesarean section decreased the odds of SSC compared with vaginal delivery. This is consistent with the findings from previous studies [36, 37]. Mothers who had caesarean section may be in pain, medicated or feel discomfort, thereby reducing the likelihood of SSC. In a previous study, hospital procedures led to the separation between mother and infant; midwives experienced obstacles to facilitate SSC due to mothers’ condition after caesarean section, lack of time and sometimes midwives felt dismissed or disappointed when they tried to communicate the benefits of SSC [38].

Furthermore, higher odds of SSC was observed among women with higher levels of education compared to mothers with no education. Educated mothers may be more knowledgeable about SSC and its benefits, they may be more likely to discuss it with their health providers and request for it even when the information is not offered by the provider. Also, mothers who had attended ANC visits had increased odds of having SSC with their newborns immediately after delivery, compared with those who had no ANC visits. Similar findings have been reported in other studies [17, 35]. ANC is an avenue to educate, counsel and prepare pregnant women for delivery. Women are educated on healthy behaviours to adopt during pregnancy and what to expect during and after delivery. At ANC visit, women can be sensitized about SSC and its benefits [35, 39]. In addition, mothers who had LBW newborns were more likely to practice SSC with their newborn immediately after birth. SSC for LBWs is a component of the WHO endorsed KMC, which also includes nutrition [40, 41]. Nigeria has recognized KMC as part of essential care for LBWs, but the coverage is poor as evidenced by a survey of 757 public secondary and tertiary hospitals across 34 states in Nigeria which showed KMC implementation in 25% of surveyed facilities [42].

At the household level, mothers from the richest household wealth quintile had higher odds of practicing SSC with their newborn immediately after birth. Women from rich households may be more educated, more likely to utilize maternal health services such as ANC, delivery in health facility [35, 43, 44] and ultimately be more aware of SSC and its benefits, from their encounter with health service providers. Community level media exposure was a significant cluster characteristic affecting SSC practice between mother and newborn at birth. Lower odds of SSC was observed among mothers from communities with high rate of non-use of media. The media plays an important role in raising awareness and creating demand for maternal health service utilization and influence health seeking behaviour [45,46,47]; usage of these services could sensitize mothers about SSC and its benefits, and provide a platform for practice.

Strength and limitation

This study utilized the most recent NDHS 2018, a nationally representative population-based survey. The findings contributes to knowledge, given the paucity of studies on the subject area in Nigeria. Also the application of multilevel analysis addressed the hierarchical nature of NDHS data. However, the study does have some limitations. First, the cross-sectional nature of the data precludes conclusions about causality of the factors on the SSC cannot be made. Secondly, the construction of community variables from aggregation of individual level data means that inferences at a higher level are made based on individual level data [48]. Thirdly, there may be recall bias as the data was collected retrospectively.

Conclusion

The coverage of SSC in Nigeria is poor, despite evidence of its numerous benefits to the mother and the newborn. Moreover, this study revealed that the practice of SSC immediately after delivery between mothers and their newborn is associated with individual level factors such as place of delivery, mode of delivery, maternal educational level, birth weight of new born, ANC attendance during pregnancy; household wealth and community exposure to media.

Availability of data and materials

Data for this study were sourced and available here: http://dhsprogram.com/data/available-datasets.cfm.

Abbreviations

AIC:

Akaike's Information Criterion

ANC:

Antenatal Care

AOR:

Adjusted Odds Ratio

BIC:

Bayesian Information Criterion

CS:

Caesarean Section

ICC:

Intra-class correlation

IMNCH:

Integrated Maternal, Newborn and Child Health

KMC:

Kangaroo Mother Care

LBW:

Low Birth Weight

MOR:

Median Odds Ratio

NDHS:

Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey

SDGs:

Sustainable Development Goals

SE:

Standard Error

SSC:

Mother and newborn skin-to-skin contact

PCV:

Proportional Change in Variance

VPC:

Variance Partition Coefficient

WHO:

World Health Organization

References

  1. 1.

    World Health Organization. Newborns: reducing mortality. 2019 [cited 7 Apr 2020]. Available: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/newborns-reducing-mortality.

  2. 2.

    Guillot M, Gerland P, Pelletier F, Saabneh A. Child Mortality Estimation: A Global Overview of Infant and Child Mortality Age Patterns in Light of New Empirical Data. PLoS Med. 2012;9:e1001299. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001299.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    World Health Organization. Every Newborn: an action plan to end preventable deaths. In: WHO [Internet]. 2014 [cited 14 Apr 2020]. Available: http://www.who.int/maternal_child_adolescent/documents/every-newborn-action-plan/en/.

  4. 4.

    Cooijmans KHM, Beijers R, Rovers AC, de Weerth C. Effectiveness of skin-to-skin contact versus care-as-usual in mothers and their full-term infants: study protocol for a parallel-group randomized controlled trial. BMC Pediatr. 2017;17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-017-0906-9.

  5. 5.

    WHO | Kangaroo mother care: a practical guide. In: WHO [Internet]. [cited 12 Mar 2020]. Available: http://www.who.int/maternal_child_adolescent/documents/9241590351/en/.

  6. 6.

    Conde-Agudelo A, Díaz-Rossello JL. Kangaroo mother care to reduce morbidity and mortality in low birthweight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;2016. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002771.pub4.

  7. 7.

    Chan GJ, Labar AS, Wall S, Atun R. Kangaroo mother care: a systematic review of barriers and enablers. Bull World Health Organ. 2016;94:130–141J. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.15.157818.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Alenchery AJ, Thoppil J, Britto CD, de Onis JV, Fernandez L, Rao PNS. Barriers and enablers to skin-to-skin contact at birth in healthy neonates - a qualitative study. BMC Pediatr. 2018;18:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-018-1033-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Nkwo PO, Lawani LO, Ezugwu EC, Iyoke CA, Ubesie AC, Onoh RC. Correlates of poor perinatal outcomes in non-hospital births in the context of weak health system: the Nigerian experience. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:341. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-14-341.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Adinma ED, Brian-D Adinma JI, Obionu CC, Asuzu MC. Effect of government-community healthcare co-financing on maternal and child healthcare in Nigeria. West Afr J Med. 2011;30:35–41. https://doi.org/10.4314/wajm.v30i1.69882.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Federal Ministry of Health. Saving Newborn Lives in Nigeria: NEWBORN HEALTH in the context of the Integrated Maternal, Newborn and Child Health Strategy. Jhpiego; Revised 2nd edition, 2011. Koninklijke Brill NV; https://doi.org/10.1163/2210-7975_HRD-9831-0006.

  12. 12.

    Doctor HV, Findley SE, Ager A, Cometto G, Afenyadu GY, Adamu F, et al. Using community-based research to shape the design and delivery of maternal health services in Northern Nigeria. Reprod Health Matters. 2012;20:104–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-8080(12)39615-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Rosa W. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. A New Era in Global Health. New York: Springer Publishing Company; 2017. https://doi.org/10.1891/9780826190123.ap02.

  14. 14.

    Seidman G, Unnikrishnan S, Kenny E, Myslinski S, Cairns-Smith S, Mulligan B, et al. Barriers and Enablers of Kangaroo Mother Care Practice: A Systematic Review. PLoS One. 2015;10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125643.

  15. 15.

    Corsi DJ, Neuman M, Finlay JE, Subramanian S. Demographic and health surveys: a profile. Int J Epidemiol. 2012;41:1602–13. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dys184.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Alenchery AJ, Thoppil J, Britto CD, de Onis JV, Fernandez L, Suman Rao PN. Barriers and enablers to skin-to-skin contact at birth in healthy neonates - a qualitative study. BMC Pediatr. 2018;18:48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-018-1033-y.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Bedaso A, Kebede E, Adamu T. Assessment of skin-to-skin contact (SSC) during the postpartum stay and its determinant factors among mothers at public health institutions in Ethiopia. BMC Res Notes. 2019;12:136. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-019-4176-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Moore ER, Anderson GC, Bergman N, Dowswell T. Early skin-to-skin contact for mothers and their healthy newborn infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;5:CD003519. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003519.pub3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Ekholuenetale M, Onikan A, Ekholuenetale CE. Prevalence and determinants of mother and newborn skin-to-skin contact in The Gambia: a secondary data analysis. J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 2020;95:18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42506-020-00050-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Rutstein SO, Staveteig S. Making the Demographic and Health Surveys Wealth Index Comparable. In: DHS Methodological Reports No. 9. Rockville: ICF International; 2014.

  21. 21.

    Hruschka DJ, Gerkey D, Hadley C. Estimating the absolute wealth of households. Bull World Health Organ. 2015;93:483–90. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.14.147082.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Huda TM, Chowdhury M, El Arifeen S, Dibley MJ. Individual and community level factors associated with health facility delivery: A cross sectional multilevel analysis in Bangladesh. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0211113. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211113.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Larsen K, Merlo J. Appropriate assessment of neighborhood effects on individual health: integrating random and fixed effects in multilevel logistic regression. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;161:81–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwi017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Stawski RS. Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling (2nd Edition). Struct Equ Model Multidiscip J. 2013;20:541–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2013.797841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Spiegelhalter DJ, Best NG, Carlin BP, van der Linde A. Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat Methodol. 2002;64:583–639. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9868.00353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Singh K, Khan SM, Carvajal-Aguirre L, Brodish P, Amouzou A, Moran A. The importance of skin–to–skin contact for early initiation of breastfeeding in Nigeria and Bangladesh. J Glob Health. 2017;7. https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.07.020505.

  27. 27.

    Abdulghani N, Edvardsson K, Amir LH. Worldwide prevalence of mother-infant skin-to-skin contact after vaginal birth: A systematic review. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0205696. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205696.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Widström A, Brimdyr K, Svensson K, Cadwell K, Nissen E. Skin-to-skin contact the first hour after birth, underlying implications and clinical practice. Acta Paediatr Oslo Nor 1992. 2019;108:1192–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.14754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Adejuyigbe EA, Bee MH, Amare Y, Omotara BA, Iganus RB, Manzi F, et al. “Why not bathe the baby today?”: A qualitative study of thermal care beliefs and practices in four African sites. BMC Pediatr. 2015;15:156. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-015-0470-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Shamba D, Schellenberg J, Hildon ZJ-L, Mashasi I, Penfold S, Tanner M, et al. Thermal care for newborn babies in rural southern Tanzania: a mixed-method study of barriers, facilitators and potential for behaviour change. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:267. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-14-267.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Hill Z, Tawiah-Agyemang C, Manu A, Okyere E, Kirkwood BR. Keeping newborns warm: beliefs, practices and potential for behaviour change in rural Ghana. Tropical Med Int Health. 2010;15:1118–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3156.2010.02593.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Callaghan-Koru JA, Seifu A, Tholandi M, de Graft-Johnson J, Daniel E, Rawlins B, et al. Newborn care practices at home and in health facilities in 4 regions of Ethiopia. BMC Pediatr. 2013;13:198. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-13-198.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Haji Y, Teshome M, Alemayehu A, Mekonnen M, W/Gebrieal F, G/Tsasdik A. The Levels of Neonatal Care Practices at Health Facilities and Home Deliveries in Rural Sidama Zone, Southern Ethiopia. J Prim Care Community Health. 2018;9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2150132718812181.

  34. 34.

    Byaruhanga RN, Bergström A, Tibemanya J, Nakitto C, Okong P. Perceptions among post-delivery mothers of skin-to-skin contact and newborn baby care in a periurban hospital in Uganda. Midwifery. 2008;24:183–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2006.09.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Mallick L, Yourkavitch J, Allen C. Trends, determinants, and newborn mortality related to thermal care and umbilical cord care practices in South Asia. BMC Pediatr. 2019;19:248. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-019-1616-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Saco MC, Coca KP, Marcacine KO, Abuchaim ÉD, Abrão AC, Saco MC, et al. Skin-to-skin contact followed by breastfeeding in the first hour of life: associated factors and influences on exclusive breastfeeding. Texto Amp Contexto - Enferm. 2019;28. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-265x-tce-2018-0260.

  37. 37.

    Menezes MAS, Gurgel R, Bittencourt SDA, Pacheco VE, Cipolotti R, do Carmo Leal M. Health facility structure and maternal characteristics related to essential newborn care in Brazil: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2018;8:e021431. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021431.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Zwedberg S, Blomquist J, Sigerstad E. Midwives’experiences with mother–infant skin-to-skin contact after a caesarean section: ‘Fighting an uphill battle’. Midwifery. 2015;31:215–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2014.08.014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    World Health Organization, editor. Counselling for maternal and newborn health care: a handbook for building skills. Geneva: World Health Organization, Department of Making Pregnancy Safer; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Agudelo S, Gamboa O, Rodríguez F, Cala S, Gualdrón N, Obando E, et al. The effect of skin-to-skin contact at birth, early versus immediate, on the duration of exclusive human lactancy in full-term newborns treated at the Clínica Universidad de La Sabana: study protocol for a randomized clinical trial. Trials. 2016;17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1587-7.

  41. 41.

    Vesel L, Bergh A-M, Kerber KJ, Valsangkar B, Mazia G, Moxon SG, et al. Kangaroo mother care: a multi-country analysis of health system bottlenecks and potential solutions. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:S5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-15-S2-S5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Bergh A-M, Mohammed SB, Vaz L. Public Hospital-Based Care of Small Newborns in Nigeria. In: Healthy Newborn Network [Internet]. 2017 [cited 7 Apr 2020]. Available: https://www.healthynewbornnetwork.org/resource/public-hospital-based-care-of-small-newborns-in-nigeria/.

  43. 43.

    Wuneh AD, Medhanyie AA, Bezabih AM, Persson LÅ, Schellenberg J, Okwaraji YB. Wealth-based equity in maternal, neonatal, and child health services utilization: a cross-sectional study from Ethiopia. Int J Equity Health. 2019;18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-019-1111-2.

  44. 44.

    Obiyan MO, Kumar A. Socioeconomic Inequalities in the Use of Maternal Health Care Services in Nigeria: Trends Between 1990 and 2008. SAGE Open. 2015;5:2158244015614070. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015614070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Zamawe COF, Banda M, Dube AN. The impact of a community driven mass media campaign on the utilisation of maternal health care services in rural Malawi. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16:21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-0816-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Dutta MJ. Health information processing from television: the role of health orientation. Health Commun. 2007;21:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410230701283256.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Odesanya A, Hassan S, Olaluwoye D. Mass Media and Maternal Healthcare: A Critical Discourse. New Media Mass Commun. 2015;34:63–71. https://doi.org/10.7176/NMMC.vol3463-71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Boco AG. Individual and Community Level Effects on Child Mortality. An analysis of 28 Demographic and Health Surveys in Sub-Saharan Africa [Internet]. Calverton, Maryland, USA: ICF Macro; 2010 p. 86. (DHS Working Papers No. 73). Report No.: WP 73. 2010; 86. Available from: http://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/WP73/WP73.pdf.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors appreciate the Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) for the approval and access to the original data.

Funding

This research received no grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ME, AB, FOB, AFI, contributed to the conceptualization, initial manuscript preparation. ME conducted data analysis and wrote the results. ME, AB, FOB, AFI contributed to the manuscript preparation, study design, review of literature, discussed the findings and critically reviewed the manuscript for its intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amadou Barrow.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study is a secondary data analysis of the Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey (NDHS) which is publicly available, and approval was granted for its use. Written consent was obtained from mothers/caregivers and data were recorded anonymously at the time of data collection during the NDHS 2018.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ekholuenetale, M., Barrow, A., Benebo, F.O. et al. Coverage and factors associated with mother and newborn skin-to-skin contact in Nigeria: a multilevel analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 21, 603 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-04079-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Kangaroo mother care
  • Postpartum
  • Neonatal
  • SSC
  • Nigeria
  • Inequality