Skip to main content
Download PDF

Elevated diastolic blood pressure until mid-gestation is associated with preeclampsia and small-for-gestational-age birth: a population-based register study

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth volume 19, Article number: 186 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Gestational hemodynamic adaptations, including lowered blood pressure (BP) until mid-gestation, might benefit placental function. We hypothesized that elevated BP from early to mid-gestation increases risks of preeclampsia and small-for-gestational-age birth (SGA), especially in women who also deliver preterm (< 37 weeks).

Methods

In 64,490 healthy primiparous women, the change in systolic and diastolic BP from early to mid-gestation was categorized into lowered (≥ 0 mmHg decreased), and elevated (≥ 1 mmHg increase). Women with chronic hypertension, chronic renal disease, pre-gestational diabetes and systemic lupus erythematosus were excluded. Risks of preeclampsia and SGA birth were estimated by logistic regression, presented with adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Further, the effect of BP change in combination with stage 1 hypertension (systolic BP 130–139 mmHg or diastolic BP 80–89 mmHg) in early gestation was estimated.

Results

Compared to women with lowered diastolic BP from early to mid-gestation, those with elevated diastolic BP had increased risks of preeclampsia (aOR: 1.8 [1.6–2.0]) and SGA birth (aOR: 1.3 [1.2–1.5]). The risk estimates were higher for preeclampsia and SGA when combined with preterm birth (aORs: 2.2 [1.8–2.8] and 2.3 [1.8–3.0], respectively). The highest rate of preeclampsia (9.9%) was seen in women with stage 1 hypertension in early gestation and a diastolic BP that was elevated until mid-gestation. This was three times the risk, compared to women with normal BP in early gestation and a diastolic BP that was decreased until mid-gestation. The association between elevated systolic BP from early to mid-gestation and preeclampsia was weak, and no significant association was found between changes in systolic BP and SGA births.

Conclusion

Elevated diastolic BP from early to mid-gestation was associated with increased risks of preeclampsia and SGA, especially for women also delivering preterm. The results may imply that the diastolic BP starts to increase around mid-gestation in women later developing placental dysfunction disorders.

Peer Review reports

Background

In pregnancies complicated with placental dysfunction disorders (i.e., preeclampsia and birth of small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infants), the blood pressure (BP) is generally higher in early gestation than in uncomplicated pregnancies [1,2,3]. Normal pregnancy is associated with gestational hemodynamic adaptations that include BP changes [4,5,6,7]. BP usually decreases from early to mid-gestation (“mid-gestational BP drop”), and this adaptation might benefit placental perfusion [8]. An absence of mid-gestational BP drop is associated with preeclampsia, but it is less clear whether this absence may also be relevant to SGA births [4, 9,10,11]. In normal pregnancy, BP usually increases from mid-gestation and onwards to reach pre-pregnancy levels in late gestation [4,5,6]. In women developing placental dysfunction disorders, systolic and diastolic BP increases faster than normal after mid-gestation [9,10,11].

We hypothesized that an increase in BP before mid-gestation may also be associated with higher risks for preeclampsia and SGA births, independently of the early-gestation BP. We further hypothesized that the association may be especially strong in women with preeclampsia and SGA who also deliver preterm (< 37 weeks).

In this population-based cohort study of 64,490 healthy primiparous women, we estimated the association between the change in systolic and diastolic BP from early to mid-gestation and the risks of preeclampsia and birth of SGA infants.

Methods

Data sources

Data were obtained from the Swedish population-based Stockholm-Gotland Obstetric Database, [12], which is based on the medical record system used in the region for all antenatal, delivery and postnatal care units. Data from the medical record system are forwarded daily to the database, which contains information from 2008 and onwards. In Sweden, antenatal and delivery care is standardized and free of charge. Home deliveries are rare. During the first antenatal visit, standardized to take place around gestational week 10, the mother is interviewed about her medical and reproductive history and smoking habits. Information on the number of prior misscarriages, pregnancies by assisted reproductive techniques in the index pregnancy and the presence of pre-gestational hypertension, diabetes and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is registered in check boxes. The mother’s height is generally self-reported, while weight and BP are measured by the midwives and recorded in the database. A urine test is acquired for a dipstick test of proteinuria. In cases of a positive dipstick, another dipstick test is taken on a separate occasion within a short time. The BP is re-measured at each antenatal visit. The second visit is standardized to occur at 20–25 gestational weeks but occurs earlier if considered necessary. BP is measured in a sitting position, using manual BP equipment with a cuff size appropriate for arm circumference. Korotkoff V is used to measure the diastolic BP. At discharge from the hospital after delivery, the responsible doctor records complications during pregnancy and delivery, according to the International Classification of Diseases, tenth revision [ICD-10].

Study population

The population was defined as healthy primiparous women who gave birth to a singleton from 2008 to 2014 in Stockholm or Gotland counties (Fig. 1). The risk of recurrence of placental dysfunction disorders is substantial [13,14,15]. Information on the outcome of previous pregnancies was lacking in this data, and therefore only primiparous women were included. Of 80,699 primiparous women, we excluded 2686 women with suspected vascular disease in early gestation, defined as one of the following conditions: chronic hypertension, chronic renal disease, pre-gestational diabetes or SLE. Chronic hypertension was defined by systolic BP ≥ 140 mmHg or diastolic BP ≥ 90 mmHg or blood pressure medication at the first antenatal visit, registration in a check box by the midwife at first antenatal visit, or by ICD-10 codes O10 and O11 at discharge from the hospital after delivery. Chronic renal disease was identified by ICD-10 code N18 (chronic renal insufficiency) or proteinuria within the first 20 weeks of gestation, defined as 2+ on a dipstick or 1+ on two separate occasions (more than 4 h apart). Women with pre-gestational diabetes were identified by a check box, as well by ICD-10 codes O24.0 and O24.3. Women with SLE were identified by a check box and by ICD-10 codes M32.1, M32.8 and M32.9. The study population was further confined to 64,500 women with a first registered BP measurement before gestational week 16 (“early gestation”) and a BP measurement between gestational weeks 20 and 25 (“mid-gestation”). The mean gestational age at the BP measurements was 10 weeks in early gestation and 22 weeks at mid-gestation. Finally, we excluded 10 women who developed preeclampsia before 26 weeks of gestation because this was within the period of defined exposure variable (see below). The final study population included 64,490 women (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow chart of the study population that includes healthy primiparous women with singleton pregnancies. We excluded women with suspected vascular disease in early gestation,defined as one of the following conditions: chronic hypertension, identified as systolic blood pressure (BP) ≥140 or diastolic BP≥90 or BP medication in early gestation, registration of chronic hypertension by checkbox at the first antenatal visit or a corresponding diagnostic code after delivery; or chronic renal disease, identified by proteinuria before 20 gestational weeks (2+ on dipstick or 1+ on two consecutive occasions) or a diagnostic code for chronic renal insufficiency after delivery; or pre-gestational diabetes, identified by registration in a checkbox at first antenatal visit or a corresponding diagnostic code after delivery; or systemic lupus erythematosus as registered in a check box or a corresponding diagnostic code after delivery

Full size image

Exposure

The main exposure was the change in the systolic and diastolic BP from early to mid-gestation. We calculated this by subtracting the mid-gestation measurements from the early-gestation measurements of systolic and diastolic BP separately. The change in BP was categorized as follows: 1) Lowered BP was defined as no change or a decrease by 1 mmHg or more, and 2) elevated BP was defined as an increase by 1 mmHg or more in BP between early to mid-gestation.

Outcomes

Outcomes were preeclampsia and SGA birth, where the latter was used as a proxy for foetal growth restriction. Preeclampsia was defined through the ICD-10 codes O14-O15. According to Swedish national guidelines during the study period, the clinical definition of preeclampsia was a BP ≥ 140 systolic or ≥ 90 mmHg diastolic, measured on two separate occasions, combined with proteinuria (≥ 0.3 g/24 h or + 1 or more on dipstick and on at least one subsequent occasion). Preeclampsia diagnosis registered in the Nordic countries was previously retrospectively validated with the above definition as the gold standard, suggesting a positive predictive value of around 80% [16, 17]. An SGA infant was defined as a liveborn infant with a birth weight of more than two standard deviations below the mean weight for gestational age, according to the Swedish sex-specific foetal growth curve [18]. If preeclampsia or SGA was present in combination with preterm birth (< 37 weeks of gestation), the outcomes were defined as preterm. Gestational age was determined using the following hierarchy: a) date of embryo transfer (3.0%), b) early second trimester ultrasound (95.2%), c) date of last menstrual period (1.8%), and d) a postnatal assessment (< 1%). In the final cohort 2241 (3.5%) women developed preeclampsia, and 1936 (3.0%) women gave birth to an SGA infant.

Covariates

The following covariates were considered as possible confounders: maternal early-gestation BP, body mass index (BMI) in early pregnancy, age at delivery, height, in vitro fertilization (IVF), prior recurrent misscarriages (three or more self-reported miscarriages), cohabitation status with partner, smoking in early pregnancy, and country of birth. The choice of covariates was based on previous reports of associations [19,20,21,22,23]. The covariates were categorized as shown in Table 1.

Table 1 The rate of preeclampsia and giving birth to a small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infant by maternal characteristics
Full size table

Statistical analysis

The rate of preeclampsia and SGA was compared through different categories of the covariates in Table 1, and a chi-square test provided p-values. The risks of preeclampsia and SGA were calculated for women with elevated BP from early to mid-gestation, using women with lowered BP as the reference category. Analyses of the changes in systolic and diastolic BP were done separately. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated, using unconditional logistic regression analysis. Adjustments were made for early gestation mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), maternal BMI, age, recurrent miscarriages, smoking, and country of birth. Early gestation MAP was used as a continuous variable, but the other variables were used in categories according to Table 1. Observations with missing values were excluded from the adjusted analysis. The covariates IVF and cohabitation status were omitted from the multiple regression models because these covariates were not independently associated with the outcomes (p-values > 0.05). Furthermore, maternal height was not included as this covariate is strongly correlated with BMI. The analyses of the risks of preeclampsia and SGA included women with both outcomes combined. To further investigate independent associations, we repeated the analysis of SGA in women who did not develop preeclampsia.

Further, the effect of the change in BP from early to mid-gestation was investigated in relation to the level of early-gestation BP that was dichotomized into normal BP (systolic BP <  130 mmHg and diastolic BP < 80 mmHg) and stage 1 hypertension (systolic BP 130–139 mmHg or diastolic BP 80–89 mmHg) [23]. These binary covariates were combined to create four groups: 1) Women with normal early-gestation BP and lowered BP towards mid-gestation, 2) Normal early-gestation BP and elevated BP towards mid-gestation, 3) Stage 1 hypertension in early gestation and lowered BP towards mid-gestation and 4) Stage 1 hypertension in early gestation and further elevated BP towards mid-gestation. The risk of preeclampsia was estimated using group 1 as the reference.

Lastly, the analysis was repeated for preterm preeclampsia and SGA, defined as preeclampsia or SGA birth in combination with preterm birth (< 37 weeks). The risks of preeclampsia and SGA were calculated for women with elevated diastolic BP from early to mid-gestation, using women with lowered diastolic BP as the reference category, and the same adjustments as above. All analysis was performed using Statistical Analysis Software version 9.3 (SAS institute, Inc., Cary, NC).

Results

In the final cohort, 3.5% were diagnosed with preeclampsia. In women with stage 1 hypertension in early gestation and in obese women (BMI ≥ 30), the rate of preeclampsia was 7% (Table 1). Women aged 35 years or older were more likely to be diagnosed with preeclampsia than younger women, and preeclampsia occurred more often in short women (< 164 cm) than in tall women (≥ 172 cm). Preeclampsia occurred more often in women that conceived by in vitro fertilization than in spontaneously pregnant women, and the rate was also higher in women with a history of recurrent miscarriages (three or more) than in women without recurrent miscarriages.

Three percent of the women gave birth to SGA infants. Preeclampsia coincided with SGA in 290 of 1936 women who gave birth to SGA infants (data not shown in table). There was only a marginal difference in SGA rates between women with normal BP and stage 1 hypertension in early gestation (Table 1). Birth of an SGA infant was more likely in underweight women (BMI < 18.5) than in women of normal weight. Women aged 35 or older were more likely to give birth to SGA infants than younger women. The SGA rate was 4.6% in short women and 1.7% in tall women. Women with a history of recurrent miscarriages had higher rates of SGA than women without recurrent miscarriages.

In the excluded group of women with suspected vascular disease, 12.3% developed preeclampsia, and 4.6% gave birth to SGA infants (data not shown in table).

The association between changes in systolic BP from early to mid-gestation and preeclampsia seemed weak (Table 2), and there was no association between changes in systolic BP and SGA births (Table 3).

Table 2 Risk of preeclampsia by changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure from early to mid-gestation
Full size table
Table 3 Risk of giving birth to small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infants by changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure from early to mid-gestation
Full size table

For women with lowered diastolic BP from early to mid-gestation, 3.2% were later diagnosed with preeclampsia (Table 2). In women with elevated diastolic BP, the corresponding rate was 4.2%. Compared to women with lowered diastolic BP, women with elevated diastolic BP were at increased risk of preeclampsia, adjusted OR (95% CI); 1.8 [1.6–2.0]. Similarly, the rate of SGA infants was 2.8% in women with lowered diastolic BP and 3.5% in women with elevated diastolic BP (Table 3). Compared to women with lowered diastolic BP, women with elevated diastolic BP were at increased risk of SGA birth, adjusted OR (95% CI); 1.3 [1.2–1.5]. After exclusion of women who developed preeclampsia, the risk increase for SGA in women with elevated diastolic BP remained.

The highest rate of preeclampsia (9.9%) was seen in women with a combination of early-gestation stage 1 hypertension and elevated diastolic BP towards mid-gestation (Table 4). The risk of preeclampsia was three-fold in this group, adjusted OR (95% CI); 3.4 [2.6–4.4], compared to the women with normal early-gestation BP and lowered diastolic BP towards mid-gestation.

Table 4 The risk of preeclampsia by stage 1 hypertension in early gestation and changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure from early to mid-gestation
Full size table

Compared with women with lowered diastolic BP from early to mid-gestation, the risks of preterm preeclampsia and preterm SGA increased in women with elevated diastolic BP, with adjusted ORs (95% CI); 2.2 [1.8–2.8] and 2.3 [1.8–3.0], respectively (Table 5).

Table 5 The risk of preterm preeclampsia and preterm births of small-for-gestational-age infants (SGA) by changes in diastolic blood pressure from early to mid-gestation
Full size table

The increase in risk for preterm SGA remained after exclusion of women who developed preeclampsia, adjusted OR (95% CI); 1.8 [1.2–2.6] (data not shown in table).

Discussion

In this study, we found that elevated diastolic BP from early to mid-gestation was associated with increased risks of preeclampsia and SGA births. The associations seemed stronger for preterm preeclampsia and SGA. This may suggest that elevated BP from early to mid-gestation in contrast to mid-gestation BP drop could be interpreted as a sign of hemodynamic maladaptation to pregnancy in women who later develop placental dysfunction disorders. The results also confirm that a second BP measurement around mid-gestation seems relevant in the antenatal risk assessment [24].

A major strength of the study was the large amount of detailed information enabling us to detect a small effect size and to stratify by early-gestation BP. Being able to define and exclude a risk group of women with suspected vascular disease in early pregnancy [1,2,3] made it possible to study the effects of BP changes within a cohort of seemingly cardiovascular healthy women. However, the lack of information about family history of preeclampsia and cardiovascular disease may be a limitation in this respect [20]. Information was available on important covariates that may confound the association, such as early pregnancy BMI [19]. Socioeconomic factors may be important confounders for the associations between BP changes during pregnancy and preeclampsia and SGA births [25]. We did not have information on maternal education level or income, but this may have been partly adjusted for by the other socioeconomic-related factors, including country of birth, maternal BMI, smoking, and age at the first pregnancy. The mean gestational age at the mid-gestation BP measurement in this study was 22 gestational weeks, while the nadir of BP is considered to be around 20 weeks [5]. Therefore, we cannot exclude a BP drop before the time-point of measurement in some women categorized with elevated BP from early to mid-gestation that may weaken the associations seen in this study. Further, the register only contains a single BP value for each time-point, and it is therefore unknown to what degree BP was measured three times in a standardized way to obtain an average BP. Although BP measurements are known to be subject to considerable variance, this is mainly expected to negatively impact the power to discriminate between health and disease rather than introduce bias.

In this study, we found increased risks of preeclampsia and SGA in women with elevated diastolic BP from early gestation (mean gestational age 10 weeks) to mid-gestation (mean 22 weeks). A weak association was also found between elevated systolic BP and preeclampsia, but the association was not significant for the outcome of SGA. Macdonald-Wallis et al. found that the risk of preeclampsia increased with increasing diastolic BP from gestational week 18 to 30, while a significant association between a rise in systolic BP and preeclampsia was first seen from week 30 onwards [10]. This study confirms previous findings and suggests that there is an association between rise in BP and risk of preeclampsia at an earlier gestational age than previously observed. In another study by Macdonald-Wallis et al., increases in systolic and diastolic BPs from gestational week 18 to 30 were negatively associated with birth weight and gestational age, and this was also applicable to women who were normotensive during the pregnancy [11]. The approach in our study was different because an association was shown between BP increase and SGA, defined as birth weight for gestational age more than two standard deviations below the population mean. The results confirm an association between diastolic BP changes and birth weight and with preterm SGA infants having very low birth weight.

Interestingly, our results showed that the rates of preeclampsia were almost comparable in women with early-gestation stage 1 hypertension that failed to decrease towards mid-gestation (around 10%) and in the excluded group of women with suspected vascular disease in early gestation (12%). This supports the importance of the early-gestation BP regarding risks of preeclampsia and implies that stage 1 hypertension in early gestation that persists at mid-gestation may be a risk factor for preeclampsia. Future studies are needed to reveal whether women with stage 1 hypertension before mid-gestation in combination with other known risk factors, such as pre-gestational diabetes, may benefit from aspirin [26,27,28].

The gestational hemodynamic adaptations before mid-gestation include decreased BP [5, 6] and total vascular resistance [7]. These adaptive changes might benefit placental perfusion [8]. The normal BP increase from mid-gestation and onward may reflect an increasing production of vasoconstrictive placental agents, perhaps because of the increased size of the placenta [29] or the increasing cardiovascular demands of pregnancy [30, 31]. Hypoperfusion of the placenta is known to induce production of such vasoconstrictive agents [32, 33], and the production of these agents seems especially high in women developing preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction [34]. In this study, we showed an association between elevated BP from early to mid-gestation and preeclampsia and birth of SGA infants. This suggests that the placentas of women experiencing preeclampsia and SGA may already be hypoperfused by mid-gestation because of the successive production of vasoconstrictive agents and increased BP [34]. What causes this placental hypoperfusion is still debated, but a recent hypothesis states that hemodynamic maladaptation to pregnancy may contribute [30]. However, the pathophysiological inference of this study is limited by the lack of pre-gestational hemodynamic measurements and information on adaptive changes before the placenta perfusion is established.

Conclusion

Our study indicates that the diastolic BP may start to increase before 25 weeks of gestation in women who develop placental dysfunction disorders, especially in women delivering preterm. The results of this study could also imply that both the cardiovascular state prior to pregnancy (reflected by BP in early gestation) and the gestational hemodynamic adaptations during pregnancy (reflected by the change in BP) are related to the pathophysiology of preeclampsia.

Abbreviations

AaOR:

Adjusted odds ratio

BMI:

Body mass index

BP:

Blood pressure

CI:

Confidence interval

ICD-10:

International classification of diseases, tenth revision

SGA:

Small-for-gestational-age

References

  1. O'Gorman N, Wright D, Syngelaki A, Akolekar R, Wright A, Poon LC, Nicolaides KH. Competing risks model in screening for preeclampsia by maternal factors and biomarkers at 11-13 weeks gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(1):103 e101–12.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bartsch E, Medcalf KE, Park AL, Ray JG. Clinical risk factors for pre-eclampsia determined in early pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis of large cohort studies. BMJ. 2016;353:i1753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ankumah NA, Cantu J, Jauk V, Biggio J, Hauth J, Andrews W, Tita AT. Risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with mild chronic hypertension before 20 weeks of gestation. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(5):966–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hermida RC, Ayala DE, Iglesias M. Predictable blood pressure variability in healthy and complicated pregnancies. Hypertension. 2001;38(3 Pt 2):736–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ochsenbein-Kolble N, Roos M, Gasser T, Huch R, Huch A, Zimmermann R. Cross sectional study of automated blood pressure measurements throughout pregnancy. BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. 2004;111(4):319–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Grindheim G, Estensen ME, Langesaeter E, Rosseland LA, Toska K. Changes in blood pressure during healthy pregnancy: a longitudinal cohort study. J Hypertens. 2012;30(2):342–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Melchiorre K, Sharma R, Khalil A, Thilaganathan B. Maternal cardiovascular function in Normal pregnancy: evidence of maladaptation to chronic volume overload. Hypertension. 2016;67(4):754–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Poppas A, Shroff SG, Korcarz CE, Hibbard JU, Berger DS, Lindheimer MD, Lang RM. Serial assessment of the cardiovascular system in normal pregnancy. Role of arterial compliance and pulsatile arterial load. Circulation. 1997;95(10):2407–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gaillard R, Bakker R, Willemsen SP, Hofman A, Steegers EA, Jaddoe VW. Blood pressure tracking during pregnancy and the risk of gestational hypertensive disorders: the generation R study. Eur Heart J. 2011;32(24):3088–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Macdonald-Wallis C, Lawlor DA, Fraser A, May M, Nelson SM, Tilling K. Blood pressure change in normotensive, gestational hypertensive, preeclamptic, and essential hypertensive pregnancies. Hypertension. 2012;59(6):1241–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Macdonald-Wallis C, Tilling K, Fraser A, Nelson SM, Lawlor DA. Associations of blood pressure change in pregnancy with fetal growth and gestational age at delivery: findings from a prospective cohort. Hypertension. 2014;64(1):36–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Stephansson O, Sandstrom A, Petersson G, Wikstrom AK, Cnattingius S. Prolonged second stage of labour, maternal infectious disease, urinary retention and other complications in the early postpartum period. BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. 2015.

  13. McDonald SD, Best C, Lam K. The recurrence risk of severe de novo pre-eclampsia in singleton pregnancies: a population-based cohort. BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. 2009;116(12):1578–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wikstrom AK, Stephansson O, Cnattingius S. Previous preeclampsia and risks of adverse outcomes in subsequent nonpreeclamptic pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204(2):148 e141–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Malacova E, Regan A, Nassar N, Raynes-Greenow C, Leonard H, Srinivasjois R, WS A, Lavin T, Pereira G. Risk of stillbirth, preterm delivery, and fetal growth restriction following exposure in a previous birth: systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. 2018;125(2):183–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Klungsoyr K, Harmon QE, Skard LB, Simonsen I, Austvoll ET, Alsaker ER, Starling A, Trogstad L, Magnus P, Engel SM. Validity of pre-eclampsia registration in the medical birth registry of Norway for women participating in the norwegian mother and child cohort study, 1999-2010. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2014;28(5):362–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Klemmensen AK, Olsen SF, Osterdal ML, Tabor A. Validity of preeclampsia-related diagnoses recorded in a national hospital registry and in a postpartum interview of the women. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;166(2):117–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Marsal K, Persson PH, Larsen T, Lilja H, Selbing A, Sultan B. Intrauterine growth curves based on ultrasonically estimated foetal weights. Acta Paediatr. 1996;85(7):843–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Savitri AI, Zuithoff P, Browne JL, Amelia D, Baharuddin M, Grobbee DE, Uiterwaal CS. Does pre-pregnancy BMI determine blood pressure during pregnancy? A prospective cohort study. BMJ Open. 2016;6(8):e011626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. North RA, McCowan LM, Dekker GA, Poston L, Chan EH, Stewart AW, Black MA, Taylor RS, Walker JJ, Baker PN, et al. Clinical risk prediction for pre-eclampsia in nulliparous women: development of model in international prospective cohort. BMJ. 2011;342:d1875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sohlberg S, Stephansson O, Cnattingius S, Wikstrom AK. Maternal body mass index, height, and risks of preeclampsia. Am J Hypertens. 2012;25(1):120–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Grantz KL, Hediger ML, Liu D, Buck Louis GM. Fetal growth standards: the NICHD fetal growth study approach in context with INTERGROWTH-21st and the World Health Organization multicentre growth reference study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017.

  23. Gunnarsdottir J, Stephansson O, Cnattingius S, Akerud H, Wikstrom AK. Risk of placental dysfunction disorders after prior miscarriages: a population-based study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;211(1):34 e31–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Macdonald-Wallis C, Silverwood RJ, de Stavola BL, Inskip H, Cooper C, Godfrey KM, Crozier S, Fraser A, Nelson SM, Lawlor DA, et al. Antenatal blood pressure for prediction of pre-eclampsia, preterm birth, and small for gestational age babies: development and validation in two general population cohorts. BMJ. 2015;351:h5948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Silva LM, Steegers EA, Burdorf A, Jaddoe VW, Arends LR, Hofman A, Mackenbach JP, Raat H. No midpregnancy fall in diastolic blood pressure in women with a low educational level: the generation R study. Hypertension. 2008;52(4):645–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hauspurg A, Sutton EF, Catov JM, Caritis SN. Aspirin effect on adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with stage 1 hypertension in a high-risk cohort. Hypertension. 2018;72(1):202–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sutton EF, Hauspurg A, Caritis SN, Powers RW, Catov JM. Maternal outcomes associated with lower range stage 1 hypertension. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132(4):843–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Poon LC, Wright D, Rolnik DL, Syngelaki A, Delgado JL, Tsokaki T, Leipold G, Akolekar R, Shearing S, De Stefani L, et al. Aspirin for evidence-based preeclampsia prevention trial: effect of aspirin in prevention of preterm preeclampsia in subgroups of women according to their characteristics and medical and obstetrical history. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(5):585 e581–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Redman CW, Sargent IL, Staff AC. IFPA senior award lecture: making sense of pre-eclampsia - two placental causes of preeclampsia? Placenta, vol. 35 Suppl; 2014. p. S20–5.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Thilaganathan B. Pre-eclampsia and the cardiovascular-placental axis. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2018;51(6):714–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Boeldt DS, Bird IM. Vascular adaptation in pregnancy and endothelial dysfunction in preeclampsia. J Endocrinol. 2017;232(1):R27–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Granger JP, Alexander BT, Llinas MT, Bennett WA, Khalil RA. Pathophysiology of hypertension during preeclampsia linking placental ischemia with endothelial dysfunction. Hypertension. 2001;38(3 Pt 2):718–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Gilbert JS, Babcock SA, Granger JP. Hypertension produced by reduced uterine perfusion in pregnant rats is associated with increased soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 expression. Hypertension. 2007;50(6):1142–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Noori M, Donald AE, Angelakopoulou A, Hingorani AD, Williams DJ. Prospective study of placental angiogenic factors and maternal vascular function before and after preeclampsia and gestational hypertension. Circulation. 2010;122(5):478–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The study was supported by the Swedish Research Council (project 2014–3561, AKW), Stockholm County Council (ALF project grant 20150118, SC), and an unrestricted grant from Karolinska Institutet (Distinguished Professor Award to SC). The funding body was not involved in the design of the study, collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, or the writing of this manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

The data for the current study are used under license and are not publicly available due to ethical and legal restrictions. However, upon request, data may be available from associate professor Olof Stephansson at the Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medicine Karolinska Institutet in Stockholm (Olof.Stephansson@ki.se).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Uppsala University, SE-75185, Uppsala, Sweden

    J. Gunnarsdottir, T. Akhter, U. Högberg & A. K. Wikström

  2. Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

    S. Cnattingius & A. K. Wikström

Authors
  1. J. Gunnarsdottir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. T. Akhter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. U. Högberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. S. Cnattingius
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. A. K. Wikström
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JG, AKW and SC made substantial contributions to conception and design. SC and AKW contributed to the acquisition of data. JG and AKW analysed the data. JG, TA, UH, SC and AKW made substantial contributions to interpretation of data. JG drafted the manuscript, and AKW, TA, UH and SC critically revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Gunnarsdottir.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Regional Ethical Board in Stockholm approved the study. Permission was obtained to access clinical data from all pregnancies resulting in a birth of an infant at 22 gestational weeks or later in Stockholm and Gotland from 2008 to 2014, and to study pregnancy and delivery complications using this database.

Reference numbers 2009/275–31, 2012/365–32 and 2014/962–32

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gunnarsdottir, J., Akhter, T., Högberg, U. et al. Elevated diastolic blood pressure until mid-gestation is associated with preeclampsia and small-for-gestational-age birth: a population-based register study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 19, 186 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2319-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2319-2

Keywords

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

ISSN: 1471-2393

Contact us