Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Incidence of postpartum infection, outcomes and associated risk factors at Mbarara regional referral hospital in Uganda

  • 1Email author,
  • 3, 4,
  • 1,
  • 5,
  • 3, 4,
  • 3,
  • 2,
  • 2,
  • 6,
  • 5,
  • 7 and
  • 5
Contributed equally
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth201818:270

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1891-1

  • Received: 3 December 2016
  • Accepted: 11 June 2018
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

There is a paucity of recent prospective data on the incidence of postpartum infections and associated risk factors in sub-Saharan Africa. Retrospective studies estimate that puerperal sepsis causes approximately 10% of maternal deaths in Africa.

Methods

We enrolled 4231 women presenting to a Ugandan regional referral hospital for delivery or postpartum care into a prospective cohort and measured vital signs postpartum. Women developing fever (> 38.0 °C) or hypothermia (< 36.0 °C) underwent symptom questionnaire, structured physical exam, malaria testing, blood, and urine cultures. Demographic, treatment, and post-discharge outcomes data were collected from febrile/hypothermic women and a random sample of 1708 normothermic women. The primary outcome was in-hospital postpartum infection. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine factors independently associated with postpartum fever/hypothermia and with confirmed infection.

Results

Overall, 4176/4231 (99%) had ≥1 temperature measured and 205/4231 (5%) were febrile or hypothermic. An additional 1708 normothermic women were randomly selected for additional data collection, for a total sample size of 1913 participants, 1730 (90%) of whom had complete data. The mean age was 25 years, 214 (12%) were HIV-infected, 874 (51%) delivered by cesarean and 662 (38%) were primigravidae. Among febrile/hypothermic participants, 174/205 (85%) underwent full clinical and microbiological evaluation for infection, and an additional 24 (12%) had a partial evaluation. Overall, 84/4231 (2%) of participants met criteria for one or more in-hospital postpartum infections. Endometritis was the most common, identified in 76/193 (39%) of women evaluated clinically. Twenty-five of 175 (14%) participants with urinalysis and urine culture results met criteria for urinary tract infection. Bloodstream infection was diagnosed in 5/185 (3%) participants with blood culture results. Another 5/186 (3%) tested positive for malaria. Cesarean delivery was independently associated with incident, in-hospital postpartum infection (aOR 3.9, 95% CI 1.5–10.3, P = 0.006), while antenatal clinic attendance was associated with reduced odds (aOR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2–0.9, P = 0.02). There was no difference in in-hospital maternal deaths between the febrile/hypothermic (1, 0.5%) and normothermic groups (0, P = 0.11).

Conclusions

Among rural Ugandan women, postpartum infection incidence was low overall, and cesarean delivery was independently associated with postpartum infection while antenatal clinic attendance was protective.

Keywords

  • Incidence
  • Risk factors
  • Postpartum
  • Uganda
  • Resource limited
  • Pregnant women
  • Labor
  • Africa
  • Infection
  • Puerperal sepsis

Background

Postpartum infection is a leading cause of maternal mortality worldwide. Approximately five million cases of pregnancy-related infection occur every year globally, and approximately 75,000 result in death [1, 2]. Infection incidence is higher in low-resource settings, and many infection-related maternal deaths are preventable [1, 2]. Postpartum infections are a subset of maternal infections occurring between delivery and the 42nd day postpartum [3]. The most common postpartum infections include endometritis (puerperal sepsis), urinary tract infections, surgical site infections, blood stream infection and wound infections [3, 4]. In a retrospective study from Mbarara Uganda, puerperal sepsis accounted for 31% of maternal deaths, making it the most common cause of maternal mortality at that facility [5].

Most research on postpartum infections has occurred in high resource countries, where risk factors include poor intrapartum hygiene, low socioeconomic status, primiparity, prolonged rupture of membranes, prolonged labor, and having more than five vaginal exams intrapartum [6]. In these settings, cesarean delivery appears to be the single most important risk factor for postpartum infection [3, 6]. In low-resource settings, risk factors for postpartum infection are poorly defined and may differ from high-resource settings due to patient, environmental and healthcare system factors [1]. In addition, most published studies from low-resource settings do not include microbiological confirmation of infection or infectious outcomes [3].

We performed a prospective cohort study to determine the incidence of postpartum infection among women with postpartum fever or hypothermia presenting for delivery or postpartum care at Mbarara Hospital. In addition, the study compared clinical outcomes between the fever/hypothermic group and the normothermic group, and examined risk factors associated with incident fever/hypothermia and a composite postpartum infection outcome.

Methods

Study site and design

We conducted a prospective cohort study among women admitted for delivery or postpartum care at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital (MRRH) in rural Uganda, in which a total of 4231 participants were enrolled. MRRH is both a regional referral and teaching hospital for Mbarara University of Science and Technology with 11,000 deliveries annually [7, 8]. Data from the entire cohort of participants was used to determine which risk factors were associated with developing a fever or hypothermia while hospitalized.

Enrollment and data collection

Women admitted to the maternity ward at MRRH for delivery or within 6 weeks postpartum were screened for enrollment into the study. Participants providing written informed consent were followed by research nurses who measured vital signs including heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate and oral temperature approximately every 8 h starting immediately after delivery, as previously described [7]. Participants who had not been tested for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) within the last 6 months were offered HIV testing. Women who did not understand English or Runyankole (the local language) or were incapacitated and their next-of-kin declined participation were excluded from the study. Questionnaires and laboratory results were entered into a Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) database [9].

Sample size and planned analyses

The sample size was calculated at 3500 participants, the number of participants needed to detect a doubling of postpartum infection risk from 5 to 10%, comparing HIV-uninfected to HIV-infected women. An additional 721 participants were enrolled to examine secondary outcomes for a nested sub-study. All analyses described in this manuscript were planned a priori before cohort enrollment began.

Sample collection and microbiology

A symptom questionnaire and structured physical exam developed by study investigators was administered to all participants febrile to > 38.0 °C or hypothermic < 36.0 °C by a trained research nurse. Febrile and hypothermic participants were tested for malaria using the SD Bioline Malaria Ag Pf/Pan rapid diagnostic test (RDT, Standard Diagnostics, Gyeonggi, Korea), provided a clean-catch urine sample, and had peripheral blood drawn aseptically into Becton Dickinson (BD) BACTEC (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, USA) aerobic, anaerobic and mycobacterial blood culture bottles. Blood culture bottles were processed at the Epicentre Mbarara Research Centre microbiology laboratory adjacent to MRRH as previously described [7].

Additional data collection

All participants who were febrile and hypothermic and a randomly selected sample of normothermic participants underwent structured interview and chart review at time of hospital discharge. Random selection was performed using a random number generator function in Excel, with the goal of selecting five normothermic participants for every febrile/hypothermic participant. Participants were followed up by phone at two and 6 weeks postpartum using a structured questionnaire to determine maternal and infant vital status, interval healthcare encounters and antibiotic usage. Interview tools were created by study investigators and pilot-tested prior to study start. Data from all participants were included in the final analysis, even if participants had missing data on specific variables. Gestational age was defined by participant report or chart documentation of last normal menstrual period. Pregnancy losses at < 28 weeks’ gestation were defined as miscarriages.

Defining postpartum infection

Postpartum endometritis (puerperal sepsis) was defined as infection of the genital tract with two or more of the following: pelvic pain, fever > 38.0 °C, abnormal vaginal discharge, and delay in the rate of reduction of the size of the uterus < 2 cm/day [10]. Upper, lower, and catheter-associated urinary tract infections (UTIs) were defined using standard published criteria as previously described [7]. Blood stream infection (bacteremia) was defined as growth of a potential pathogen in one or more blood culture bottles. The composite outcome of postpartum infection was defined as having one or more of the following: postpartum endometritis, UTI or bloodstream infection.

Data analysis

This present study is the primary analysis of data collected in this prospective cohort study. Summary statistics were used to characterize the cohort. Demographic characteristics and outcomes were compared between febrile/hypothermic participants and normothermic participants using Chi-squared analysis for categorical variables and student’s t-test or Wilcoxon Ranksum for continuous variables. P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Separate multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with development of fever/hypothermia, postpartum endometritis and the composite postpartum infection outcome. Predictor variables selected for potential inclusion in each model included published risk factors for postpartum fever and infection such as age, parity, employment, district of residence, comorbidities, number of vaginal exams in labor, and reported duration of labor. Additional variables were included if on bivariate analysis they demonstrated a correlation with the outcome of interest with a P-value < 0.1. Backwards stepwise elimination was used to create the final model, and all variables with P-values< 0.05 in the final model were considered significant independent predictors of the outcome. Data from all participants enrolled into the study were included in the final analysis regardless of whether the subjects were retained or later withdrew. If patients withdrew their consent, no further sample or data collection was performed. All analyses were performed using Stata software (Version 12.0, StataCorp, College Station, TX).

Results

Enrollment and demographics

Of all eligible women presenting to MRRH for care during the study period, over 99% (4235) were enrolled, four withdrew before data collection was performed, for a total enrollment of 4231. At least one temperature measurement was recorded for 4176 (99%) of participants, and two or more measurements were recorded for 2917 (69%, Fig. 1). Among the 4176 participants with a temperature recording, fever/hypothermia was recorded at least once in 205 (5%). Of these, 10 (5%) were missing interview or chart review and 14 (7%) were missing 2-week and 6-week follow up data. Of 1708 normothermic participants randomly selected for additional data collection, 138 (8%) and 151 (9%) were missing chart review and interview data, respectively. Two- and six-week follow up data was missing in 368 (22%) and 370 (22%) respectively (Fig. 1). Of those who underwent chart review and interview, missing data ranged from 0 to 8% for individual variables.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Enrollment, retention, clinical and laboratory testing for women enrolled into a prospective cohort study of postpartum infection at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital, Uganda

Among the 1913 febrile/hypothermic and randomly selected normothermic women, 1752 underwent interview and 1767 underwent chart review. The mean age was 25.2 years (standard deviation (SD) 5.5 years), 214 (12%) were HIV-infected, 874 (51%) delivered by cesarean, and 662 (38%) were primiparous (Table 1). The mean age of febrile/hypothermic participants was significantly younger than normothermic participants (23.5 versus 25.4 years, SD 5.5 years, P < 0.001). Febrile/hypothermic participants were also less likely to reside within Mbarara (32% versus 45%, P = 0.001) or to be formally employed (41% versus 26%, P < 0.001). Febrile/hypothermic participants were more likely to be referred from another health facility (24% versus 12%, P < 0.001) and more likely to be primiparous (55% versus 36%, P < 0.001) than normothermic participants. Cesarean delivery was also significantly more common among febrile/hypothermic participants (81% versus 47%, P < 0.001). The proportion of HIV-infected did not differ between the two groups (12% each P = 0.86).
Table 1

Demographics, obstetric history and post-delivery care of study participants, comparing febrile and hypothermic participants to normothermic participants

Characteristic (n = 1913)

Normothermic number (%)

(n = 1708)

Febrile or hypothermic number (%)

(n = 205)

P-value*

Sociodemographics

Age category

 

< 0.001

 ≤19

187 (12)

47 (24)

 

 20–34

1217 (79)

142 (73)

 

 > 34

135 (9)

6 (3)

 

Residence in Mbarara municipality

664 (45)

58 (32)

0.001

Married

1452 (93)

177 (91)

0.19

No formal employment

925 (59)

145 (74)

< 0.001

Median household monthly income in UGx (USD)

150,000 (42)

100,000 (28)

0.10

HIV-infected

190 (12)

24 (12)

0.86

Referred from another health facility

183 (12)

48 (24)

< 0.001

Pregnancy & Obstetric History

Admitted in labor

1503 (96)

183 (93)

0.046

Attended ≥4ANC visits

1101 (71)

138 (71)

0.99

Malaria prophylaxis during pregnancy (or taking TMP/SMX)

1434 (92)

175 (90)

0.26

Medical condition reported during pregnancy

 Syphilis or sexually transmitted infection

47 (3)

9 (5)

0.23

 Urinary tract infection

47 (3)

3 (2)

0.24

 Malaria

152 (10)

18 (9)

0.81

 Diabetes, cardiac or renal condition

4 (0.3)

0 (0)

0.48

Total number of pregnancies

 

< 0.001

 1

555 (36)

107 (55)

 

 2–4

799 (51)

71 (36)

 

 ≥5

203 (13)

17 (9)

 

Gestational age at delivery

 

0.45

 Preterm (< 37 weeks)

140 (10)

22 (13)

 

 Term (37–42 weeks)

1199 (82)

131 (78)

 

 Post-term (> 42 weeks)

121 (8)

16 (9)

 

Number of vaginal exams (self-reported)

 

0.32

 0–4

1269 (89)

165 (91)

 

 ≥5

162 (11)

16 (9)

 

Delivery mode

 

< 0.001

 Vaginal (spontaneous, breech or assisted)

814 (53)

37 (19)

 

 Cesarean

720 (47)

154 (81)

 

Estimated duration of labor (mean hours, SD)

16.2 (SD 15)

19.7 (SD 17)

0.01

Singleton pregnancy

1505 (97)

188 (96)

0.37

Post-Delivery Care

Peri-Cesarean antibiotic prophylaxis received

666 (99)

135 (99)

0.85

Urinary catheter placed

755 (48)

159 (82)

< 0.001

Catheter days (mean days, SD n = 914)

1.9 (1.0)

2.2 (1.3)

< 0.001

Duration of hospitalization (n = 1769; days, mean SD)

2.3 (2.1)

4.7 (5.9)

< 0.001

HIV human immunodeficiency virus, UGx Uganda Shillings, USD United States Dollar, TMP/SMX trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, ANC antenatal clinic, SD standard deviation

*Tests of association between cohort characteristics and temperature classification were performed using Chi squared, Fisher’s exact, and Student’s t-tests, where appropriate

Evaluation of fever and hypothermia

Of 205 febrile or hypothermic participants, 174 (85%) completed physical exam and symptom questionnaire, provided blood and urine cultures, and underwent malaria RDT. Another 7/205 (3%) withdrew from the study, and 24/205 (12%) underwent partial evaluation: 7/205 (3%) refused sample collection and clinical evaluation but did not withdraw, 11/205 (5%) were missing urine culture, 1/205 (0.5%) was missing blood cultures, 3/205 (1%) refused sample collection but underwent clinical examination and 2/205 (1%) refused clinical examination and sample collection but completed the symptom questionnaire (Fig. 1).

In-hospital postpartum infection incidence

Overall, 84/4231 (2%) of participants met criteria for one or more in-hospital postpartum infections. Endometritis was the most common, identified in 76/193 (39%) of women evaluated clinically. Of these 74 women with clinical endometritis and a recorded delivery mode, 61 (82%) delivered by cesarean, for a postpartum endometritis incidence of 7% among all recorded 875 cesarean deliveries. Twenty-five of 175 (14%) participants with urinalysis and urine culture results met criteria for UTI. Bloodstream infection was diagnosed in 5/185 (3%) participants with blood culture results. Another 5/186 (3%) were malaria RDT-positive. A diagnosis of cesarean surgical site wound infection was recorded in the chart for 5/205 (2%) febrile or hypothermic participants. The remaining 90/174 (52%) participants fully evaluated did not have a documented source of fever after our evaluation. The population attributable fraction (PAF) of postpartum infections due to cesarean delivery was 44%.

In-hospital complications

Development of any in-hospital complication (including surgical site infection, re-admission to hospital, re-operation) was more common in febrile/hypothermic participants than normothermic participants (7% versus 1%, P < 0.001, Table 2). There was one participant who died in the hospital from the febrile/hypothermic group versus none in the normothermic group (P = 0.11). More febrile/hypothermic women than normothermic women had died by 6 weeks postpartum (3 versus 0 deaths, P = 0.002). Birth and perinatal outcomes were also worse in the febrile/hypothermic group including a significantly higher number of stillbirths (9% versus 3%, P < 0.001), and lower mean 5-min Apgar score (9.0 versus 9.6, P < 0.001), and neonatal or infant death within 6 weeks of life (12% versus 5%, P < 0.001, Table 2).
Table 2

Comparison of maternal and fetal outcomes between febrile/hypothermic participants and normothermic participants

Characteristic (n = 1913)

Normothermic

number (%)

(n = 1708)

Febrile or hypothermic

number (%)

(n = 205)

P-value*

MATERNAL COMPLICATIONS (n = 1726)

Any of the following complications

13 (1)

13 (7)

< 0.001

Hysterectomy

1 (0.1)

0 (0)

1.0

Ruptured uterus

4 (0.3)

2 (1)

0.14

Blood transfusion

6 (0.4)

0 (0)

1.0

Re-operation

0 (0)

4 (2)

< 0.001

Death

0 (0)

1 (1)

0.11

Cesarean wound surgical site infection

3 (0.2)

7 (4)

< 0.001

Intensive care unit admission

0 (0)

1 (1)

0.11

Readmission to MRRH during postpartum period

12 (1)

17 (8)

< 0.001

Maternal death within 6 weeks

0 (0)

3 (2)

0.002

MATERNAL CHART DIAGNOSES (n = 1767)

Premature rupture of membranes

19 (1)

8 (4)

0.002

Pre-eclampsia or eclampsia

14 (1)

4 (2)

0.13

Puerperal sepsis

2 (0.1)

14 (7)

< 0.001

Obstructed or prolonged labor

107 (7)

31 (16)

< 0.001

Antepartum hemorrhage

11 (1)

0 (0)

0.24

Chorioamnionitis

2 (0.1)

0 (0)

0.62

Malaria

2 (0.1)

1 (1)

0.22

FETAL AND BIRTH OUTCOMES (n = 1680)

Outcome of singleton neonate by discharge

 

< 0.001

Miscarriage

2 (0.1)

0 (0)

 

Stillborn

40 (3)

16 (9)

Live birth

1431 (97)

168 (91)

Live birth, in hospital death

9 (1)

1 (1)

Singleton alive at discharge, dead by 2 weeks (n = 1415)

11 (1)

4 (2)

0.07

Live birth, multiple gestation (n = 106)

85 (96)

15 (88)

0.25

1-min Apgar score (n = 1648, mean, SD)

8.4 (1.8)

7.8 (2.6)

< 0.001

5-min Apgar score (n = 1642, mean, SD)

9.6 (1.8)

9.0 (2.8)

< 0.001

Singleton birth weight (kilograms)

 

0.01

< 2.5

83 (6)

14 (7)

 

2.5–3.5

1048 (70)

145 (78)

3.6–4.0

286 (19)

27 (14)

> 4

73 (5)

1 (1)

Twin/triplet birth weight < 2.5 kg (n = 106)

36 (41)

12 (71)

0.02

Stillbirth or neonatal death within 6 weeks (n = 1597)

65 (5)

22 (12)

< 0.001

MRRH Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital, SD standard deviation, IQR Interquartile range

*Tests of association between complications/outcomes and temperature classification were performed using Chi squared, Fisher’s exact, and Student’s t-tests, where appropriate

Multivariable analysis of factors associated with postpartum outcomes

In multivariable logistic regression analysis, factors independently associated with postpartum fever/hypothermia included history of sexually transmitted infection (STI) during pregnancy (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 4.0, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7–9.6) and cesarean delivery (aOR 2.9, 95% CI, 1.8–4.8, Table 3). Formal employment (aOR 0.5, 95% CI, 0.3–0.8) and multiparity (aOR 0.5, 95% CI, 0.3–0.7) were associated with reduced odds of postpartum fever/hypothermia. Factors independently associated with the composite in-hospital postpartum infection outcome (including confirmed diagnosis of UTI, endometritis or bloodstream infection) were cesarean delivery (aOR 3.9, 95% CI, 1.5–10.3) and increasing number of days admitted to hospital (aOR 1.2, 95% CI, 1.1–1.3). Attending antenatal care clinic ≥4 times was associated with reduced odds of postpartum infection (aOR 0.4, 95% CI, 0.2–0.9, Table 4).
Table 3

Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis of factors associated with postpartum fever/hypothermia among all study participants

 

Univariable

Multivariable

Characteristic

OR (95% CI)

P-value*

OR (95% CI)

P-value*

History of STI during pregnancy

1.5 (0.7–3.3)

0.29

4.0 (1.7–9.6)

0.002

Cesarean delivery

4.8 (3.3–7.0)

< 0.001

2.9 (1.8–4.8)

< 0.001

Number of days admitted to hospital

1.4 (1.3–1.5)

< 0.001

1.2 (1.1–1.4)

< 0.001

Formal employment

0.5 (0.3–0.7)

< 0.001

0.5 (0.3–0.8)

0.002

Multiparous

0.6 (0.4–0.7)

< 0.001

0.5 (0.3–0.7)

0.001

Residence in Mbarara municipality

0.6 (0.4–0.8)

0.001

0.7 (0.5–1.1)

0.11

Number of vaginal exams in labor

1.0 (0.9–1.1)

1.0

0.9 (0.8–1.0)

0.06

HIV-infected

1.0 (0.6–1.6)

1.0

1.0 (0.5–1.9)

0.94

Age

0.9 (0.9–1.0)

< 0.001

1.0 (0.9–1.0)

0.40

Number of hours in labor

1.0 (1.0–1.0)

0.08

1.0 (1.0–1.0)

0.95

Referred from an outside facility

2.6 (1.8–3.7)

< 0.001

1.5 (0.9–2.4)

0.10

CI confidence interval, OR odds ratio, STI sexually transmitted infection, HIV human immunodeficiency virus

*Tests of association between cohort characteristics and the presence or absence of postpartum fever or hypothermia were performed using univariable or multivariable logistic regression analysis

Table 4

Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis of factors associated with composite postpartum infection outcome among all cohort participants, including in-hospital confirmed diagnosis of urinary tract infection, endometritis or bloodstream infection

 

Univariable

Multivariable

Characteristic

OR (95% CI)

P-value*

OR (95% CI)

P-value*

Cesarean delivery

7.7 (3.9–15.1)

< 0.001

3.9 (1.5–10.3)

0.006

Number of days admitted to hospital

1.3 (1.2–1.4)

< 0.001

1.2 (1.1–1.3)

0.001

Attended antenatal care ≥4 times

0.7 (0.4–1.2)

0.20

0.4 (0.2–0.9)

0.02

Multiparous

0.3 (0.2–0.5)

< 0.001

0.5 (0.3–1.0)

0.06

Formal employment

0.6 (0.4–1.0)

0.04

0.7 (0.4–1.2)

0.20

Number of vaginal exams in labor

1.0 (0.9–1.1)

0.97

0.9 (0.8–1.1)

0.24

HIV-infected

1.0 (0.5–2.1)

0.91

1.4 (0.6–3.3)

0.49

Age

0.9 (0.8–0.9)

< 0.001

0.9 (0.9–1.0)

0.08

Number of hours in labor

1.0 (1.0–1.0)

0.26

1.0 (1.0–1.0)

0.66

Referred from an outside facility

2.3 (1.4–4.0)

0.002

1.1 (0.5–2.4)

0.75

Diagnosis of obstructed labor

2.5 (1.3–4.6)

0.005

1.4 (0.6–3.2)

0.40

Admitted to the floor at any time

0.4 (0.3–0.7)

< 0.001

0.8 (0.4–1.5)

0.45

Residence in Mbarara municipality

0.6 (0.4–1.0)

0.08

0.8 (0.4–1.5)

0.52

Number of days with a urinary catheter in place

1.8 (1.5–2.1)

< 0.001

1.1 (0.8–1.4)

0.53

CI confidence interval, OR odds ratio, STI sexually transmitted infection, HIV human immunodeficiency virus

*Tests of association between cohort characteristics and the presence or absence of postpartum composite outcome were performed using univariable or multivariable logistic regression analysis

Factors independently associated with development of in-hospital clinically-confirmed diagnosis of postpartum endometritis, which was the most common outcome amongst the infections, were cesarean delivery (aOR 2.7, 95% CI, 1.2–6.2) and increasing number of days admitted to hospital (aOR 1.2, 95% CI, 1.1–1.3). Multiparity was associated with reduced odds of postpartum endometritis (aOR 0.5, 95% CI, 0.2–1.0, Appendix 1).

Discussion

In this prospective cohort of women presenting to a Ugandan regional referral hospital, among those who developed postpartum fever/hypothermia, cesarean delivery was the strongest independent risk factor for developing endometritis or a composite postpartum infection outcome. Other risk factors independently associated with postpartum infection included longer hospital stays and attending antenatal clinic fewer than the four visits recommended by 2015 Ugandan national guidelines. Therefore, efforts should be made to reduce the high proportion of cesarean deliveries, increase antenatal care attendance, reduce the number of days of admission and reduce the number of days of indwelling urethral catheters.

The incidence of postpartum fever or hypothermia in our cohort was 5%, and a source of infection was confirmed in 48% of those with documented fever or hypothermia, for a 2% overall incidence of confirmed in-hospital postpartum infection. The overall fever and infection incidence we report here is low. However, the most common infection among our participants was postpartum endometritis, and among cesarean deliveries we report an incidence of (7%), over 3-fold greater than estimates from high-resource settings (1.8–2.0%) [1113]. Though infection incidence in Mbarara appears higher than European and North American estimates, comparing our findings to other low-resource settings is difficult. The reported incidence of postpartum endometritis in sub-Saharan Africa varies widely, likely due to differences in infection definition, surveillance, diagnosis, patient population and healthcare practices. One study at Uganda’s largest referral hospital, where HIV prevalence is 21%, reported 73/478 (15%) patients undergoing emergency cesarean delivery developed postpartum endometritis [14], more than double the 7% incidence reported here. The lower incidence of postpartum endometritis we report may reflect differences in practice, antibiotic use, and infection control procedures within Uganda. Also, the other Ugandan study was published in 2011, at a time when fewer HIV-infected women were on antiretroviral therapy, which could have led to higher infection rates. Historically, HIV has been associated with increased risks of postpartum sepsis, including postpartum endometritis [15]. Other studies from sub-Saharan Africa report postpartum endometritis in 1–17% after cesarean delivery [1620], and our report of 7% incidence falls within this wide range. Though the incidence we report here is relatively low, postpartum infection may become more common in sub-Saharan Africa as a result of increasing cesarean delivery rates coupled with rising incidence of nosocomial infections [7].

We found UTIs in 14% and bloodstream infections in 3% of febrile/hypothermic participants. Comparisons of the incidence of UTI and bloodstream infections to other studies are difficult, as these infections are defined and reported inconsistently in the few other studies from sub-Saharan Africa [13, 14]. However, postpartum UTI incidence in some European studies is as low as 3% after cesarean delivery and 2% after vaginal delivery [21]. The difference in UTI incidence between our study and the other studies may be attributable to the fact that laboratory diagnosis of UTIs in our study was performed only for febrile and hypothermic participants, a group with a high likelihood of infection. It is also possible that cesarean delivery preparation and urinary catheter days may differ in other settings.

Report of sexually transmitted infection diagnosis during pregnancy, cesarean delivery, increasing number of hospital days, lack of formal employment and primiparity were independently associated with fever/hypothermia in our cohort. Predictors of postpartum fever in low-resource settings are not very well described in the literature, except that prolonged second stage of labor is a risk factor for postpartum fever [2]. Our report of postpartum fever associations with STIs and primiparity is not reported elsewhere in the literature, and merits further investigation.

Of note, birth and perinatal outcomes were overall worse in the fever/hypothermic group compared to the normothermic group. It is possible these differences reflect a pathological process present before delivery which could have contributed to poor fetal and neonatal outcomes. This is an area of investigation that should be explored to better understand maternal inflammatory and infectious contributors to stillbirth and early neonatal death and how to prevent postpartum infection.

Cesarean delivery was associated with the composite in-hospital postpartum infection outcome (including confirmed diagnosis of UTI, endometritis or bloodstream infection). In fact, in multivariable logistic regression models for each of the three outcomes (fever/hypothermia, endometritis, postpartum infection composite outcome), cesarean delivery was independently associated with each outcome with adjusted odds ratios of 2.7–3.9. This finding is consistent with other reports that postpartum infection is three times more likely to occur after cesarean section than after vaginal delivery [22]. In addition, the population attributable fraction of postpartum fever and postpartum infections due to cesarean delivery in our study was 44%. Our findings support previous research indicating that cesarean delivery is the most important risk factor for developing postpartum infection [3, 6, 23]. Our results should reinforce efforts to reduce cesarean delivery rates to appropriate levels to avoid preventable, cesarean-associated infections. In addition, antibiotic prophylaxis, hygienic delivery, and postpartum care conditions should continue to be emphasized as important factors mitigating infection risk. We also found that attending the recommended number of antenatal care visits (≥4 times during pregnancy at the time this study was conducted) was associated with reduced odds postpartum infection. Antenatal clinic interventions may help prevent postpartum infection through earlier detection and treatment of disease conditions, including sexually transmitted infections and UTI. Lastly, long hospital stays are a known risk factor for developing postpartum UTIs [23], and likely contribute to incident postpartum endometritis. Though prolonged hospitalization can result from fever or infection, it can also contribute to development of infection through increasing nosocomial transmission risk, prolonged exposure to invasive catheters and devices, and unhygienic conditions.

Strengths of our study include the prospective study design, large sample size, near-complete enrollment of eligible women seeking care at MRRH during the study period, and an in-depth clinical and microbiological evaluation of participants with suspected infection. Of note, at MRRH cesarean deliveries are performed under spinal anesthesia, and no cesarean or vaginal delivery participants had epidural anesthesia for labor analgesia. Epidural placement is one of the commonest causes of fever in labor and immediate postpartum period [24, 25], but does not confound the findings in our study.

Limitations of our study include reliance on chart diagnosis of surgical site wound infection, which was inconsistently documented. Though the initial study design did not include wound infection as part of the composite postpartum infection outcome, cesarean surgical site infection is a known cause of postpartum fever [26] and may account for a high proportion of fevers and hypothermia in participants with no other confirmed infectious source after our evaluation. We abstracted chart diagnosis of cesarean section surgical site infections but did not perform clinical or microbiologic evaluation of these infections. Lack of confirmation of cesarean wound infections is a limitation of our study since these are likely under-reported inpatient charts. In addition, due to resource constraints, we were unable to perform clinical or microbiological testing of normothermic participants and thus unable to determine the incidence of infection in the normothermic group. However, we expect that clinically significant in-hospital postpartum infections would include fever or hypothermia and therefore we believe we were unlikely to have missed significant infections in normothermic women. Prolonged rupture of membranes is a known risk factor for postpartum infection but was not directly measured in this study. We collected participant-reported duration of labor as one measurement of prolonged labor but we did not measure duration of membrane rupture directly. Lastly, at this regional referral hospital cesarean deliveries are common, accounting for 50% of all deliveries in this study. Though the cesarean delivery rate is high at MRRH, 50% may overestimate the true cesarean delivery rate due to early discharge and non-enrollment of some women delivering vaginally. We documented whether a woman was prescribed antibiotics on the same day as her cesarean section procedure, but we were unable to confirm whether these were given, nor determine the timing of the prescription relative to the procedure. Future research should address infections occurring after hospital discharge, incident in-hospital and post-discharge surgical site infection, and the impact of prophylactic antibiotics on incident infection and development of antimicrobial resistance.

Conclusions

In our low-resource setting, cesarean delivery is independently associated with risk of incident in-hospital postpartum fever/hypothermia, endometritis and a composite postpartum infection outcome. Other independent risk factors for postpartum infection include longer hospital stays and attending antenatal clinic fewer than the recommended four visits. Efforts at reducing the high proportion cesarean deliveries, increasing antenatal care attendance, and reducing the number of days admitted and days of urethral indwelling catheter need to be optimized. With the high proportion of women with no identifiable source of infection, there is need for better bedside diagnostic means and antimicrobial evidence-based prescription.

Notes

Abbreviations

ANC: 

Antenatal clinic

CAUTI: 

Catheter-associated urinary tract infection

CI: 

Confidence interval

HIV: 

Human immunodeficiency virus

MRRH: 

Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital

OR: 

Odds ratio

RDT: 

Rapid diagnostic test

SD: 

Standard deviation

STI: 

Sexually transmitted infection

TMP/SMX: 

Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole

UGx: 

Ugandan shillings

UTI: 

Urinary tract infection

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to all study participants, study staff, and BD (Becton, Dickinson, and Company, Belgium) for the generous donation of blood culture bottles used in this study, as well as the staff of Epicentre Mbarara Research Centre, MGH Center for Global Health, University of Antwerp International Health Unit, Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital and Maternity Ward staff, and Mbarara University of Science and Technology for their partnership in this research.

Funding

LMBSalary supported by NIH Research Training Grant # R25 TW009337 funded by the Fogarty International Center and the National Institute of Mental Health, NIH T32 Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award #5T32AI007433–22, KL2/Catalyst Medical Research Investigator Training award (an appointed KL2 award) from Harvard Catalyst | The Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center (National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health Award KL2 TR001100) and the Charles H. Hood Foundation; travel supported by the MGH Center for Global Health. IVBHarvard University Center for AIDS Research (CFAR), an NIH funded program (P30 AI060354), which is supported by the following NIH Co-Funding and Participating Institutes and Centers: NIAID, NCI, NICHD, NHLBI, NIDA, NIMH, NIA, NIDDK, NIGMS, NIMHD, FIC, and OAR. MJSNIH (K23 MH09916). DRBSullivan Family Foundation. BJWNational Institutes of Health (NIH K23 ES021471). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of Harvard Catalyst, Harvard University and its affiliated academic healthcare centers, or the National Institutes of Health. The funding bodies listed here had no role in the design of the study, or collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, or in writing the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

JN conceptualized the research idea, collected and analyzed data, drafted the manuscript and participated in critical revisions. LMB conceptualized the research idea, collected and analyzed data, drafted the manuscript and participated in critical revisions. YF conceptualized the research idea and participated in critical revisions. AB conceptualized the research idea and participated in critical revisions. MJS participated in data analysis and critical manuscript revisions. IVB participated in data analysis and critical manuscript revisions. YJ participated in data analysis and critical manuscript revisions. JPVg participated in data analysis and critical manuscript revisions. JK conceptualized the research idea and participated in critical manuscript revisions. BJW conceptualized the research idea, participated in data analysis and critical manuscript revisions. DRB conceptualized the research idea and participated in critical manuscript revisions. LER conceptualized the research idea and participated in critical revisions. We confirm that all authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical review and clearance was obtained from Mbarara University Research Ethical Committee (08/10–14), Uganda National Council and Technology (HS/1729) and Partners Healthcare (2014P002725/MGH). All participants gave informed written consent to participate in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

We confirm that author Yves Jacqueymn serves on the Editorial Board of BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth as Associate Editor. We also confirm that all other authors have no competing interests to declare.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 1410, Mbarara, Uganda
(2)
Global Health Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
(3)
Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
(4)
Massachusetts General Hospital Center for Global Health, Boston, MA, USA
(5)
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
(6)
Institute of Maternal Newborn and Child Health, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda
(7)
Oregon Health & Science University-Portland State University School of Public Health, Portland, OR, USA

References

  1. Miller AE, Morgan C, Vyankandondera J. Causes of puerperal and neonatal sepsis in resource-constrained settings and advocacy for an integrated community-based postnatal approach. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013;123(1):10–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Janni W, Schiessl B, Peschers U, Huber S, Strobl B, Hantschmann P, Uhlmann N, Dimpfl T, Rammel G, Kainer F. The prognostic impact of a prolonged second stage of labor on maternal and fetal outcome. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2002;81(3):214–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. van Dillen J, Zwart J, Schutte J, van Roosmalen J. Maternal sepsis: epidemiology, etiology and outcome. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2010;23(3):249–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Lapinsky SE. Obstetric infections. Crit Care Clin. 2013;29(3):509–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Ngonzi J, Tornes YF, Mukasa PK, Salongo W, Kabakyenga J, Sezalio M, Wouters K, Jacqueym Y, Van Geertruyden J-P. Puerperal sepsis, the leading cause of maternal deaths at a Tertiary University Teaching Hospital in Uganda. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16(1):207.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Maharaj D. Puerperal pyrexia: a review. Part I. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2007;62(6):393–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bebell LM, Ngonzi J, Bazira J, Fajardo Y, Boatin AA, Siedner MJ, Bassett IV, Nyehangane D, Nanjebe D, Jacquemyn Y, et al. Antimicrobial-resistant infections among postpartum women at a Ugandan referral hospital. PLoS One. 2017;12(4):e0175456.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Bebell LM, Ngonzi J, Siedner MJ, Muyindike WR, Bwana BM, Riley LE, Boum Y, Bangsberg DR, Bassett IV. HIV Infection and risk of postpartum infection, complications and mortality in rural Uganda. AIDS Care. 2018:1–11.Google Scholar
  9. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Dolea C, Stein C. Global burden of maternal sepsis in the year 2000, vol. 2016. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003.Google Scholar
  11. Yokoe DS, Christiansen CL, Johnson R, Sands KE, Livingston J, Shtatland ES, Platt R. Epidemiology of and surveillance for postpartum infections. Emerg Infect Dis. 2001;7(5):837.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Axelsson D, Blomberg M. Prevalence of postpartum infections: a population-based observational study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014;93(10):1065–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Ahnfeldt-Mollerup P, Petersen LK, Kragstrup J, Christensen RD, Sorensen B. Postpartum infections: occurrence, healthcare contacts and association with breastfeeding. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012;91(12):1440–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Wandabwa JN, Doyle P, Longo-Mbenza B, Kiondo P, Khainza B, Othieno E, Maconichie N. Human immunodeficiency virus and AIDS and other important predictors of maternal mortality in Mulago Hospital Complex Kampala Uganda. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(1):1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Calvert C, Ronsmans C. HIV and the risk of direct obstetric complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e74848.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Moodliar S, Moodley J, Esterhuizen T. Complications associated with caesarean delivery in a setting with high HIV prevalence rates. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007;131(2):138–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Bako B, Audu BM, Lawan ZM, Umar JB. Risk factors and microbial isolates of puerperal sepsis at the University of Maiduguri Teaching Hospital, Maiduguri, North-eastern Nigeria. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012;285(4):913–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Mutihir JT, Utoo B. Postpartum maternal morbidity in Jos, north-central Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract. 2011;14(1)Google Scholar
  19. Mivumbi VN, Little SE, Rulisa S, Greenberg JA. Prophylactic ampicillin versus cefazolin for the prevention of post-cesarean infectious morbidity in Rwanda. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2014;124(3):244–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Khaskheli M-N, Baloch S, Sheeba A. Risk factors and complications of puerperal sepsis at a tertiary healthcare centre. Pak J Med Sci. 2013;29(4):972.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Leth RA, Moller JK, Thomsen RW, Uldbjerg N, Norgaard M. Risk of selected postpartum infections after cesarean section compared with vaginal birth: a five-year cohort study of 32,468 women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88(9):976–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kankuri E, Kurki T, Carlson P, Hiilesmaa V. Incidence, treatment and outcome of peripartum sepsis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003;82(8):730–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Schwartz MA, Wang CC, Eckert LO, Critchlow CW. Risk factors for urinary tract infection in the postpartum period. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;181(3):547–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Segal S. Labor epidural analgesia and maternal fever. Anesth Analg. 2010;111(6):1467–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Herbst A, Wølner-Hanssen P, Ingemarsson I. Risk factors for fever in labor. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;86(5):790–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Collin SM, Baggaley RF, Pittrof R, Filippi V. Could a simple antenatal package combining micronutritional supplementation with presumptive treatment of infection prevent maternal deaths in sub-Saharan Africa? BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2007;7:6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement