Skip to main content
Download PDF

Prevalence and related factors of inappropriate gestational weight gain among pregnant women with overweight/ obesity in Thailand

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth volume 23, Article number: 319 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

An inappropriate gestational weight gain (GWG) among pregnant women with overweight/obesity is a crucial health problem. Its prevalence remains high worldwide, particularly in urban areas. The prevalence and predicting factors in Thailand are lack of evidence. This study aimed to investigate prevalence rates, antenatal care (ANC) service arrangement, predictive factors, and impacts of inappropriate GWG among pregnant women with overweight/obesity in Bangkok and its surrounding metropolitan area.

Methods

This cross-sectional, retrospective study used four sets of questionnaires investigating 685 pregnant women with overweight/obesity and 51 nurse-midwives (NMs) from July to December 2019 in ten tertiary hospitals. Multinomial logistic regression identified predictive factors with a 95% confidence interval (CI).

Result

The prevalence rates of excessive and inadequate GWG were 62.34% and 12.99%. Weight management for pregnant women with overweight/obesity are unavailable in tertiary cares. Over three-fourths of NMs have never received weight management training for this particular group. ANC service factors, i.e., GWG counseling by ANC providers, quality of general ANC service at an excellent and good level, NMs' positive attitudes toward GWG control, significantly decreased the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of inadequate GWG by 0.03, 0.01, 0.02, 0.20, times, respectively. While maternal factors, sufficient income, and easy access to low-fat foods reduce AOR of inadequate GWG by 0.49, and 0.31 times. In contrast, adequate maternal GWG knowledge statistically increased the AOR of inadequate GWG 1.81 times. Meanwhile, easy access to low-fat foods and internal weight locus of control (WLOC) decreased the AOR of excessive GWG by 0.29 and 0.57 times. Finally, excessive GWG significantly increased the risk of primary C/S, fetal LGA, and macrosomia 1.65, 1.60, and 5.84 times, respectively, while inadequate GWG was not associated with adverse outcomes.

Conclusion

Prevalence rates of inappropriate GWG, especially excessive GWG remained high and affected adverse outcomes. The quality of ANC service provision and appropriate GWG counseling from ANC providers are significant health service factors. Thus, NMs should receive gestational weight counseling and management training to improve women's knowledge and practice for gestational weight (GW) control.

Peer Review reports

Background

Inappropriate GWG is a crucial health problem for pregnant women with overweight/obesity because it causes adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes [1, 2]. The global prevalence of overweight and obesity (pre-pregnancy BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2) in women of reproductive age has increased continuously in Thailand, particularly in Bangkok and its surrounding area [3]. Over 50% of pregnant women with overweight/obesity are more likely to have inappropriate GWG, especially excessive GWG [2, 4] that is associated with adverse outcomes such as pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH), cesarean delivery, large-for-gestational-age (LGA) fetus and macrosomia [1, 2]. Meanwhile, inadequate GWG is associated with small-for-gestational-age (SGA) neonates [5, 6], low birth weight, and preterm birth [1]. Thus, the Ministry of Public Health, Thailand (MOPH) launched surveillance of appropriate GWG as a process indicator of the ANC service delivery system [7].

According to the determinants of GWG by IOM (2009), inappropriate GWG is a preventable pregnancy outcome that may be influenced by multifaceted factors at multiple levels [8]. The evidence showed that nulliparous, obese pre-pregnancy BMI [4] and ability to access healthy food [8, 9] were significantly associated with inadequate GWG. While several research studies found that maternal characteristics, including medical conditions [4], advanced or younger maternal age, single status, nulliparous [4, 10], received correctly advice about GWG [10], low income [11], overweight pre-pregnancy BMI [4, 8, 12], and inadequate healthy food consumption [12, 13] were significantly related to excessive GWG. Whereas, some maternal factors in those researches evidence were not significantly related to GWG [9, 14, 15]. In addition, the maternal knowledge, WLOC, perceived barriers, social support, and intentions defined as health cognitions [16, 17] were associated with GW control [18,19,20]. However, the studies found that GWG could result from GWG counseling women received during antenatal care [21, 22].

The ANC service system factors may significantly contribute to inappropriate GWG [8]. The ANC service arrangement, including characteristics and resources in healthcare settings [8, 23], and lack of concerned about GW control from healthcare providers [24] were associated with GWG. Meanwhile, the lack of knowledge, confidence, and negative attitude toward GW control of healthcare providers were associated with providing GWG counseling [25]. The WHO recommended that all pregnant women receive counseling about healthy eating and keeping physical activity (PA) to prevent excessive weight gain during antenatal care visits [26]. The provision of ANC services, such as using standard guidelines and providing effective lifestyle intervention focusing on diet and PA, significantly decreased the percentage of pregnant women with excessive GWG [27,28,29,30]. However, some studies reported that brief health behavior interventions did not affect GWG and pregnancy outcomes [31] as well as receiving the fulfilled standard guideline for pregnant women had not affected the pregnancy outcomes [32]. The literature revealed that to achieve appropriate GWG, more intensive personal counseling, follow-up sessions, and individualized adaptive plans are needed. Moreover, the qualitative studies found that women received limited advice about GWG, and conflicting information about IOM recommendations during their antenatal visits [21, 22].

Currently, ANC service arrangement, inappropriate GWG in Thailand, and contributions of maternal and health service system factors to inadequate and excessive GWG among pregnant women with overweight/obesity are less studied. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate prevalence rates, ANC service system arrangement, predictive factors, and impacts of inappropriate GWG among pregnant women with overweight/obesity across 10 tertiary hospitals in Bangkok and Metropolitans area, Thailand. The study results might help develop strategies to promote optimal GWG and effective ANC service delivery for pregnant women.

Methods

Study setting, sample size, and design

The retrospective and cross-sectional study design were conducted from July to December 2019 in Bangkok and four provinces of the Metropolitan area. The research settings were 10 ANC units (4 ANC units in Bangkok and 6 ANC units in the Metropolitans area). The participants included postpartum women, Head Nurses and NMs of ANC units. The inclusion criteria for postpartum women were age older than 18 years, pre-pregnancy BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2, attended 1st ANC before 28 weeks of gestation, singleton pregnancy, delivery at ≥ 37 weeks’ gestation, able to read and understand Thai language. In addition, all Head Nurses of 10 ANC units and 46 full-time NMs at ANC units were eligible. The sample size of postpartum women calculation was based on odds ratio from a previous study [4], using the G*Power program version 3.1 according to correlation and logistic regression models [10, 33], with a p-value of 0.05 (2 sided) and power of analysis of 0.80. Moreover, 10% was added to the sample size to account for incomplete responses and data errors. Thus, the total sample size for this study was 720 postpartum women. The quota sampling technique was employed. Figure 1 presents the number of postpartum women in each hospital setting according to the live birth rate among ten tertiary hospitals in 2018 [34]. The study was approved by the Human Research for Ethics Committees of the Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, and all hospital settings.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flowchart of hospital setting and subjects selection

Full size image

Variables and instruments

We used four sets of questionnaires to collect the data from the participants, antenatal records, and labor record forms. The maternal record form and ANC service provision questionnaire were developed by the researchers based on the literature review [26,27,28, 35,36,37]. The maternal record form was used to collect maternal characteristics (i.e., sociodemographic data, obstetric data, pre-pregnancy BMI, gestational weight and birth outcomes) retrieved from an antenatal and labor records. The questionnaires on health behaviors [12], health cognitions [17], and healthcare provider's questionnaire [25] were modified with permission for this study. Back translation technique [38] was used to ensure content, semantic, and technical equivalence in health cognitions and healthcare providers' questionnaires. Cronbach’s alpha of health behaviors and health cognitions questionnaires were 0.77–0.72 [12] and 0.58—0.79 [17], respectively. Details of the variables and measurements are presented in Table 1.

Table 1 Definition and measures of research instruments
Full size table

Statistical analyses

Descriptive statistics, including frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation (SD) were used to summarize the characteristics of postpartum women, NMs, and the ANC service system arrangement. Chi-square test was used to test the differences in the proportions of variables between GWG categories and birth outcomes at a significant level of 0.05. The assumption for statistics use of multilevel logistic regression analysis was tested by using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) to see the variance of health service level that contributed to inadequate GWG and excessive GWG that were 0.0265 and 0.0073, respectively. This indicates that there were no variations in hospital levels. The univariate logistic regression analysis was performed and a more conservative level of statistical significance (p-value < 0.20) was used in selecting variables in the predictive model [41, 42]. Multivariable multinomial logistic regression models were used for testing the predictive model of inappropriate GWG, using an odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval. Meanwhile, binary logistic regression models were used to verify the effect of inappropriate GWG to maternal and neonatal birth outcomes at a significant level of 0.05. Statistical analysis used the IBM© Statistic Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), version 20 [43].

Results

Prevalence of inappropriate GWG among pregnant women with overweight/obesity

Of the 685 postpartum women who participated in the current study, 446(65.12%), 177 (25.84%), 49(7.15%), and 13 (1.89%) were pregnant women with overweight, obese I, obese II, and obese III, respectively. The prevalence of adequate GWG was 26.91%, 19.77%, 24.49, and 15.38%, respectively. Notably, the percentage of excessive GWG decreased, while the share of inadequate GWG increased among obese I, II, and III, respectively (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Prevalence of total GWG stratified by pre-pregnancy BMI

Full size image

Maternal characteristics and information

Of postpartum women, 685 who completed the questionnaires (from a response rate of 689 mothers, 95.69%) were included in the data analysis. Participants' mean age was 29.76 years (SD = 6.14), with an average household income of 25,900.44 baht per month (SD = 22,690.54). Most participants reported living with their partners (90.36%) and having easy access to low-fat foods (86.72%). Nearly three-fourths of those were nulliparous and had sufficient income. However, over half of them had overweight pre-pregnancy BMI, no medical conditions, early ANC visits, less than 8 ANC visits, and had not received GWG advice. Regarding health cognitions, over half of the participants had adequate knowledge, internal WLOC, high social support, and intention to control GWG; they had a low perceived barrier to gestational weight control. Likewise, 50.80% and 56.79% of pregnant women with overweight/obesity had appropriate healthy food consumption and adequate PA during pregnancy.

Nurse-midwife's characteristics and information

Fifty-one NMs from 10 ANC units (from a response rate of 10 Head nurses and 46 NMs, 91.07%) completed the questionnaires. Participants' mean age and work experiences were 48.39 (SD = 8.755) and 9.31 years (SD = 8.76) respectively. Most participants earned bachelor's degrees and had more than ten years of work experience. Over three-fourths of NMs reported that they never received training on weight management for pregnant women with overweight/obesity. In addition, over half of the participants revealed they did not have sufficient GWG knowledge. The mean GWG knowledge, attitudes toward GWG control, and GWG counseling practice scores were 43.82 (SD = 5.344), 13.78 (SD = 1.316), and 51.20 (SD = 1.32), respectively. However, only 57.14% of participants in NUHs had positive attitudes toward GWG control. GWG counseling practice was non-routine in all UHs and in 5 NUHs (Table 2).

Table 2 Characteristics of nurse-midwives in 10 tertiary hospitals, Bangkok and Metropolitan area, Thailand, 2019
Full size table

ANC service arrangement for pregnant women with overweight/obesity

The participating hospitals included eight NUHs and two UHs. There were 114 cases (SD = 40.26) per day. The healthcare providers were obstetricians (OBs), NMs, nurse assistants, and advanced practice nurses (APNs). ANC service arrangements in all UHs provided ANC service every weekday and had Maternal Fetal Monitoring (MFM) clinics available. The weight management service for pregnant women with overweight/obesity are not available in all tertiary care. In two UHs and two NUHs, the ANC providers (OBs and NMs) provided GWG counseling for pregnant women with overweight/obesity when they performed abdominal examinations. If the gestational weight was uncontrolled, the ANC providers cooperated with the dietitians or APNs for GWG counseling practice. In the fewer NUHs, GWG counseling was provided by NMs or general physicians, and group health education on nutrition and diet control by the dieticians. In addition, seven out of eight NUHs had nurse-patient ratios more than standard criteria (1:20). Moreover, various pre-pregnancy BMI and GWG guidelines were used in each hospital. The dietary and PA guidelines were not available in most tertiary care. However, the quality of general ANC service provision in tertiary care remained at a good to excellent level. Some NUHs did not use a nutrition graph or weight gain chart plotting to evaluate nutrition and weight gain status. Specific ANC services were provided at a good level in two UHs and four NUHs (Table 3).

Table 3 ANC service delivered in 10 tertiary hospitals, Bangkok and Metropolitan area, Thailand, 2019
Full size table

Predicting factors and impacts of inappropriate GWG

The pregnant women with overweight/obesity who had sufficient income (AOR 0.49; 95% CI: 0.27–0.92) and ease of access to low-fat food (AOR 0.31; 95% CI: 0.13–0.77) had significantly decreased odds of inadequate GWG than those without such resources and access. Paradoxically, the women who had adequate GWG knowledge were 1.81 times (AOR 1.81; 95% CI: 1.02–3.23) more likely to have inadequate GW than women with inadequate GWG knowledge. GWG counseling practice by ANC providers as a part of general ANC services (AOR 0.03; 95% CI: 0.00–0.53) were assessed to be of good (AOR 0.02; 95% CI: 0.00–0.63) or very good quality (AOR 0.01; 95% CI: 0.00–0.39), with positive attitudes toward GWG control by healthcare providers (AOR 0.20; 95% CI: 0.06–0.61). These practices and attitudes significantly decreased the odds of inadequate GWG. ANC service system factors were not significantly associated with excessive GWG. Meanwhile, only maternal predicting factors, namely the convenience of access to low-fat food (AOR 0.29; 95% CI: 0.14–0.60) and internal WLOC (AOR 0.57, 95% CI 0.37–0.86), significantly decreased the odds of excessive GWG (Table 4).

Table 4 Predicting factors of GWG of tertiary hospitals in Bangkok and Metropolitan area, Thailand, 2019
Full size table

Pregnant women with overweight/obesity who had excessive GWG were more likely to have primary C/S (AOR 1.65; 95% CI: 1.07–2.55), fetal LGA (AOR 1.60; 95% CI: 1.01–2.54), and macrosomia (AOR 5.84; 95% CI: 1.38–24.80), compared to those with adequate GWG. Meanwhile, those pregnant women who had inadequate GWG were not significantly associated with SGA (AOR 1.07; 95% CI: 0.55–2.07) (Table 5).

Table 5 Impacts of inappropriate GWG in tertiary hospitals in Bangkok and Metropolitan area, Thailand, 2019
Full size table

Discussion

The study's findings indicated that the prevalence of inappropriate GWG among pregnant women with overweight/obesity in Bangkok and metropolitan areas, Thailand is still high (75.33%), especially for excessive GWG. This finding is congruent with previous studies that have reported women who are overweight and obese are more likely to gain excess weight as recommended by the IOM guidelines [2, 6, 10]. A high rate of excessive GWG might be because the recommendation of total GWG by IOM for pregnant women with overweight/obesity (2009) [8] is narrow. Thus, it is difficult for them to control. Moreover, appropriate weight gain had multiple influences such as personal and environmental factors, and advice from healthcare providers [44]. However, GWG tends to decline as pre-pregnancy BMI increases [45].

This study illustrates that ANC service system arrangements for preventing inappropriate GWG for pregnant women with overweight/obesity are similar to those for normal-weight pregnant women. There was no specific intervention for weight management in all hospitals. Pregnant women with overweight/obesity received care in high-risk clinics only when they had complications or maternal morbidity to prevent adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. In addition, there were own guidelines on weight management, and some guidelines were not regularly used in the care of pregnant women with overweight/obesity. Even though most NMs had self-assessed adequate knowledge and positive attitudes toward controlling GW, they had never received training in GWG management. Consequently, GWG counseling was only provided as a routine practice. Therefore, the GWG counseling may not have been personalized to women's needs or specific to pregnant women with overweight/obesity. Moreover, the GWG information provided was only general nutrition education due to a high workload or less nurse-patient ratio in each ANC unit. Thus, healthcare providers could provide the GWG information only as a group nutrition education.

These findings are congruent with previous studies that showed that each ANC unit in Bangkok, Thailand had different approaches to providing services and developed clinical practice guidelines regarding three main services (antenatal screening, disease treatment, and health education) based on recommendations of the Department of Health and the Royal Thai College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists [46]. Sindhu et al. (2017) pointed out that pregnant women having complications should receive care in high-risk clinics at tertiary care [37]. Although, there is no evidence to support that specific clinics for pregnant women with overweight/obesity are needed. Several studies found that the service delivery for controlling gestational weight among pregnant women with overweight/obesity should be designed as adaptive interventions/dosages throughout periods of pregnancy [28, 29]. Previous study pointed out that GWG control should be individual face to face counseling 45–60 min by professional ANC providers, starting with education on GWG/PA/energy intake (EI), and importance of GWG related factors. The tailored goal-setting/action plans for achieving GWG/PA/EI goals can be performed, as well as self-monitoring of GWG with mHealth devices, assessing and monitoring fetal growth and development [30]. Moreover, adequate and targeted information about optimizing nutrition, lifestyle, and weight gain in pregnancy is significantly associated with women’s compliance with IOM guidelines [22, 28].

Multivariate logistic analysis showed that maternal factors and the antenatal care service system could jointly predict a likelihood of inappropriate GWG with a Nagelkerke' s Pseudo R-Square of 0.1406. Adequate GWG knowledge, sufficient income, easy access to low-fat food were the significant predictors of inadequate GWG at the individual level. This finding aligns with the previous reports that appropriate GWG was associated with maternal and environmental factors [8, 47, 48]. An inadequate weight gain is protective against LGA for class 2 and 3 obese pregnant women and GDM for the class 3 obesity group [49]. Adequate GWG knowledge among pregnant women with overweight/obesity affected inadequate GWG. This might be because they were concerned and attempted to control their body weight to prevent adverse health outcomes such as GDM and fetal LGA. Sufficient income and easy access to low-fat food enabled women to purchase nutritious food and practice a healthy diet for weight control. Previous evidence also showed that access to healthy food [8, 50] and sufficient income [11] are facilitators of adequate GWG. However, easy access to healthy food as low-fat food was also significantly associated with excessive GWG. The high-fat food restriction is an essential topic of GWG counseling [51], while the gestational fatty acid status is essential for healthy fetal development [52]. According to lifestyle interventions based on nutritional concepts, most obstetricians and nurse-midwives in tertiary hospitals recommended low-fat food to control gestational weight to prevent adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Likewise, a previous study revealed that an effective lifestyle intervention (increases the proportion of polyunsaturated fatty acids and omega-6 fatty acids from a low-fat food diet) is unlikely to have an adverse impact on the developing fetus [53]. Moreover, the internal WLOC was a vital health cognitive factor reflecting individuals' beliefs in their abilities to control body weight [16, 17]. Thus, only maternal factors such as WLOC and access to low fat food were predictive of excessive weight gain among pregnant women with overweight/ obesity. Moreover, the chi-square analysis on the factors associated with excessive gain were not differences in proportions in subjects from different locations in this study.

According to ANC service system factors in this study, the group of significantly protective factors with inadequate GWG were good to excellent general ANC service quality, the GWG counseling by ANC providers, and a positive attitude toward weight control of healthcare providers. This finding is consistent with previous reports that health interventions, provider advice, and health facilities were the factors in the ANC service delivery system related to GWG [8, 45]. Current general ANC service provisions cover standard antenatal care, including gestational weight gain monitoring and control activities were associated with good pregnancy outcomes [26, 36, 37]. GWG counseling practice delivered by a team of experienced ANC providers resulted in appropriate GWG as compared to interventions delivered by non-prenatal care providers [54]. With a team approach, women may receive clearer directives about the impact of inappropriate GWG and how to control their weight. Most NMs in this study had positive attitudes toward gestational weight control. As in a previous study, nurse-midwives should encourage pregnant women with overweight/obesity to control GWG [21].

Birth outcomes such as risk of primary cesarean section, fetal LGA, and macrosomia were significantly associated with GWG. These findings are congruent with previous studies indicating that pregnant women with overweight/obesity who gained gestational weight excessively were more likely to have a cesarean delivery because of delayed cervical dilation, shoulder dystocia, and macrosomia [1, 2, 6].

The current ANC service arrangement can prevent inadequate weight gain but not excessive weight gain because there was overcrowding in the ANC unit, limited knowledge, and insufficiently trained healthcare providers. Quality of ANC service provision at good to very good level and a positive attitude among healthcare providers to control gestational weight were key predicting factors preventing inappropriate GWG among the study population. Therefore, a training program for GW management should be established to ensure self-confidence among ANC providers in GWG counseling practice. Moreover, an evaluation and monitoring process for the quality of ANC services should be undertaken to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Strengths and limitations

Our findings identify previously unconfirmed predictive factors regarding the prevalence of inappropriate GWG among pregnant women with overweight/obesity and ANC service system arrangements in Bangkok, Thailand. This research extends knowledge regarding GWG management for pregnant women with overweight/obesity living in the urban areas of Thailand. These findings as preliminary evidence call for establishing gestational weight policy and guidelines for vulnerable pregnant women. However, a limitation of this study is the possible bias of self-reported data of some factors due to the research instruments. The researcher selected the best research instruments based on national and international guidelines and a literature review from a standardized database system to modify and develop the most reliable research instruments.

Conclusion

In conclusion, inappropriate GWG among pregnant women with overweight/obesity in metropolitan Bangkok remained high, especially for excessive GWG that is significantly associated with primary C/S, fetal LGA, and macrosomia in the health care system. ANC service provisions covered at least the standard antenatal care recommendations and guidelines. In addition, GWG counseling was provided by ANC providers during physical examination and affected women's intention to control gestational weight. Moreover, the positive attitude of nurse-midwifes who provided good to excellent quality ANC service influenced appropriate GWG among pregnant women with overweight/obesity. Thus, good ANC service arrangements can reduce the prevalence of inappropriate GWG for pregnant women with overweight/obesity. However, a training program for GW management should be established to ensure knowledge self-confidence among ANC providers in GWG counseling practice.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

GWG:

Gestational weight gain

ANC:

Antenatal care

NMs:

Nurse-midwives

BMI:

Body mass index

WLOC:

Weight locus of control

MOPH:

Ministry of Public Health in Thailand

UHs:

University hospitals

NUHs:

Non-University hospitals

References

  1. Guan P, Tang F, Sun G, Ren W. Effect of maternal weight gain according to the Institute of Medicine recommendations on pregnancy outcomes in a Chinese population. J Int Med Res. 2019;47(9):4397–412.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Devlieger R, Ameye L, Nuyts T, Goemaes R, Bogaerts A. Reappraisal of gestational weight gain recommendations in obese pregnant women: A population-based study of 337,590 births. Obes Facts. 2020;13:333–48.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Aekplakorn W. Thai national health examination survey VI B. E. 2562–2563. Health System research Institute, Thailand. [internet]. 2021 [cited 2022 October 9]; Available from: https://www.hsri.or.th/media/printed-matter/detail/13443. (in Thai)

  4. Deputy NP, Sharma AJ, Kim SY, Hinkle SN. Prevalence and characteristics associated with gestational weight gain adequacy. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(4):773.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Xu Z, Wen Z, Zhou Y, Li D, Luo Z. Inadequate weight gain in obese women and the risk of small for gestational age (SGA): A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;30(3):357–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Goldstein RF, Abell SK, Ranasinha S, Misso ML, Boyle JA, Harrison CL, et al. Gestational weight gain across continents and ethnicity: systematic review and meta-analysis of maternal and infant outcomes in more than one million women. BMC Med. 2018;16(1):1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bureau of Reproductive Health, Department of Health, Ministry of Public health, Thailand. A mid-term evaluation of the Second National Reproductive Health Policy and Strategies (2560 - 2569 B.E.) to promote quality of birth and growth. [internet]. 2021 [cited 2021 January]. Available from: https://rh.anamai.moph.go.th/th/download-03/download?id=80427&mid=31985&mkey=m_document&lang=th&did=25574. (in Thai)

  8. Institute of Medicine (US) and National Research Council (US) Committee to Reexamine IOM Pregnancy Weight Guidelines. In: Rasmussen KM, Yaktine AL, editors. Weight gain during pregnancy: reexamining the guidelines. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); (The National Academies Collection: Reports funded by National Institutes of Health); 2009.

  9. Crandall AK, Temple JL, Kong KL. The association of food insecurity with the relative reinforcing value of food, BMI, and gestational weight gain among pregnant women. Appetite. 2020;151:104685.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Deemongkol P, Limruangrong P, Phahuwatanakorn W, Boriboonhirunsarn D. Predictive factors of gestational weight gain among overweight and obese women. Nurs Sci J Thailand. 2020;38(2):46–58 (in Thai).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Garay S, Sumption L, Pearson R, John R. Risk factors for excessive gestational weight gain in a UK population: a biopsychosocial model approach. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jantradee B, Serisathian Y, Phahuwatanakorn W. Predictive factors of gestational weight gain. J Royal Thai Army Nurs. 2014;15(2):339–47 (in Thai).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Suliga E, Rokita W, Adamczyk-Gruszka O, Pazera G, Cieśla E, Głuszek S. Factors associated with gestational weight gain: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18(1):1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cheu LA, Yee LM, Kominiarek MA. Food insecurity during pregnancy and gestational weight gain. Am J Obstetr Gynecol MFM. 2020;2(1):100068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dolin CD, Gross RS, Deierlein AL, Berube LT, Katzow M, Yaghoubian Y, et al. Predictors of gestational weight gain in a low-income Hispanic population: Sociodemographic characteristics, health behaviors, and psychosocial stressors. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(1):352.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. McDonald SD, Yu ZM, van Blyderveen S, Schmidt L, Sword W, Vanstone M, et al. Prediction of excess pregnancy weight gain using psychological, physical, and social predictors: a validated model in a prospective cohort study. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(6):e0233774.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. de Jersey SJ, Mallan KM, Callaway LK, Daniels LA, Nicholson JM. Prospective relationships between health cognitions and excess gestational weight gain in a cohort of healthy and overweight pregnant women. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017;117(8):1198–209.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lindsay AC, Machado MMT, Wallington SF, Greaney ML. Sociocultural and interpersonal influences on latina women’s beliefs, attitudes, and experiences with gestational weight gain. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(7):e0219371.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Champlin S, Walker LO, Mackert M. Beliefs, attitudes, and practices of latinas related to gestational weight gain: a qualitative meta-synthesis. Matern Child Health J. 2021;25(1):107–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Plante A-S, Lemieux S, Labrecque M, Morisset A-S. Relationship between psychosocial factors, dietary intake and gestational weight gain: a narrative review. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019;41(4):495–504.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Knight-Agarwal CR, Williams LT, Davis D, Davey R, Shepherd R, Downing A, et al. The perspectives of obese women receiving antenatal care: A qualitative study of women’s experiences. Women Birth. 2016;29(2):189–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Whitaker KM, Becker C, Healy H, Wilcox S, Liu J. Women’s report of health care provider advice and gestational weight gain: a systematic review. J Womens Health. 2021;30(1):73–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Koech WA, Lilly CL. Association of county perinatal resources and gestational weight gain in West Virginia, United States. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):497.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Di Stefano A, Godard S, Bellaire J. Excessive gestational weight gain: Assessing patients’ and providers’ perceptions. Can Fam Physician. 2021;67(7):e188–96.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Morris J, Nikolopoulos H, Berry T, Jain V, Vallis M, Piccinini-Vallis H, et al. Healthcare providers’ gestational weight gain counselling practices and the influence of knowledge and attitudes: A cross-sectional mixed methods study. BMJ Open. 2017;7(11):e018527.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. World Health Organization. WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience: summary: highlights and key messages from the World Health Organization' s 2016 global recommendations for routine antenatal care. [cited 2018 January 21]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/259947/WHO-RHR-18.02-eng.pdf.

  27. Ferrara A, Hedderson MM, Brown SD, Ehrlich SF, Tsai A-L, Feng J, et al. A telehealth lifestyle intervention to reduce excessive gestational weight gain in pregnant women with overweight or obesity (GLOW): a randomized, parallel-group, controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020;8(6):490–500.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Fair F, Soltani H. A meta-review of systematic reviews of lifestyle interventions for reducing gestational weight gain in women with overweight or obesity. Obes Rev. 2021;22(5):e13199.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. de Jersey S, Meloncelli N, Guthrie T, Powlesland H, Callaway L, Chang AT, et al. Outcomes from a hybrid implementation-effectiveness study of the living well during pregnancy Tele-coaching program for women at high risk of excessive gestational weight gain. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22(1):1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Downs DS, Savage JS, Rivera DE, Pauley AM, Leonard KS, Hohman EE, et al. Adaptive, behavioral intervention impact on weight gain, physical activity, energy intake, and motivational determinants: results of a feasibility trial in pregnant women with overweight/obesity. J Behav Med. 2021;44(5):605–21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Daley A, Jolly K, Jebb SA, Roalfe A, Mackilllop L, Lewis A, et al. Effectiveness of a behavioral intervention involving regular weighing and feedback by community midwives within routine antenatal care to prevent excessive gestational weight gain: POPS2 randomized controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2019;9(9):e030174.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Pooltananan P, Luengratsameerung S. Effect of Unfulfilled Standard Antenatal Care on Pregnancy Outcomes. Thai J Obstetr Gynecol. 2019;27(2):71–8.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A-G, Buchner A. G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39(2):175–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. The live birth rate of ten tertiary care hospital, 2018 by Strategy and Planning Division, The Ministry of Public Health, Thailand. (in Thai)

  35. Department of Health, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand. Guidelines for nutritional health promotion in clinics. Bureau of Nutrition, Department of Health. Bangkok: The War Veterans Organization of Thailand Printing; 2015. (in Thai)

  36. Tannirandorn Y, Phupong W, Kovavisarach E, editors. Maternal and fetal medicine. 3rd ed. Bangkok: The Royal Thai College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; 2012. (in Thai)

  37. Limruangrong P. Nursing Practice for the Management of Overweight in Women. In: Sindhu S, Limruangrong P, Tungkumwan T, editors. Nurse Led in Overweight Management. 1st ed. Bangkok: Wattana Printing; 2017. p. 31–97 (in Thai).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Srijaiwong S, Sindhu S, Ratinthorn A, Viwatwongkasem C. Factors influencing sexual behaviors among Thai adolescents. J Popul Soc Stud [JPSS]. 2017;25(3):171–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. TadesseBerehe T, Modibia LM. Assessment of quality of antenatal care services and its determinant factors in public health facilities of Hossana Town, Hadiya Zone, Southern Ethiopia: a longitudinal study. Adv Public Health. 2020;2020:1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. World Health Organization. Making pregnancy safer: assessment tool for the quality of hospital care for mothers and newborn babies. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2009. [cited 2018 January 21]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/107968.

  41. de Abreu Rodrigues AV, Augusto ALP, Salles-Costa R. Inadequacy of gestational weight gain during high-risk pregnancies is not associated with household food insecurity. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhang Z. Model building strategy for logistic regression: purposeful selection. Ann Transl Med. 2016;4(6):111–17.

  43. Nie N, Hull C, Bent D. IBM statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS Version 20). Computer Software. Chicago: SPSS. 2011.

  44. White C, Davis D. Barriers and enablers in maintaining healthy gestational weight gain: A qualitative study. Women Birth. 2021;34(5):e461–e7.43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Siega-Riz AM, Bodnar LM, Stotland NE, Stang J. The current understanding of gestational weight gain among women with obesity and the need for future research. NAM perspectives. 2020; 2020. https://doi.org/10.31478/202001a

  46. Topothai C, Patcharanarumol W, Putthasri W, Paodit P, Lumbiganon P. Antenatal care services part I: Do health facilities in Bangkok provide ANC services according to the guideline? J Health Sci. 2015;24(4):709–19 (in Thai).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Ratan BM, Garbarino AH, Sellner AA, Miao D, Hollier LM. Social determinants of gestational weight gain in an obese, low-income population. Am J Perinatol. 2020;37(03):296–303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Dolatian M, Sharifi N, Mahmoodi Z, Fathnezhad-kazemi A, Bahrami-vazir E, Rashidian T. Weight gain during pregnancy and its associated factors: a path analysis. Nurs Open. 2020;7(5):1568–77.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Oliva M, Sipe B, Odibo L, Odibo AO. Inadequate gestational weight gain among obese women: harmful or protective?[17D]. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135(5):43S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Silva TPRd, Viana TGF, Pessoa MC, Felisbino-Mendes MS, Inácio MLC, Mendes LL, et al. Environmental and individual factors associated with gestational weight gain. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Murray-Davis B, Berger H, Melamed N, Mawjee K, Syed M, Barrett J, et al. Gestational weight gain counselling practices among different antenatal health care providers: a qualitative grounded theory study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):102.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Bodnar LM, Parks WT, Perkins K, Pugh SJ, Platt RW, Feghali M, et al. Maternal pre- pregnancy obesity and cause-specific stillbirth. Am J Clin Nutr. 2015;102(4):858–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Mills HL, Patel N, White SL, Pasupathy D, Briley AL, Santos Ferreira DL, et al. The effect of a lifestyle intervention in obese pregnant women on gestational metabolic profiles: findings from the UK Pregnancies Better Eating and Activity Trial (UPBEAT) randomised controlled trial. BMC Med. 2019;17(1):1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Yeo S, Walker JS, Caughey MC, Ferraro AM, Asafu-Adjei JK. What characteristics of nutrition and physical activity interventions are key to effectively reducing weight gain in obese or overweight pregnant women? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2017;18(4):385–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to give sincere thanks to all participants (pregnant women with overweight/obesity, nurse-midwives, and head nurses of the ANC units) who took the time to participate in the questionnaires.

Funding

No funding was obtained for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Nursing, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand

    Thanyawalai Chairat, Ameporn Ratinthorn & Piyanun Limruangrong

  2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand

    Dittakarn Boriboonhirunsarn

Authors
  1. Thanyawalai Chairat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ameporn Ratinthorn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Piyanun Limruangrong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Dittakarn Boriboonhirunsarn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

TC, AR, PL, and DB involved for contributions to development, study design and acquisition of data. TC, AR, and DB analyzed and interpreted the data. TC and AR have been involved in drafting and revising the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Each author has agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ameporn Ratinthorn.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of the Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University (COA. no. si319/2019), 2) the Institutional Review Board of the Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University Hospital (COA. no. 106/2652), 3) Human, Ethics Research Committee, Somdechphrapinklao Hospital, Naval Medical Department (COA. no. 016/62), 4) Human Ethics Research Committee, Nakhonpathom hospital (COA. no. 011/2019), 5) Human Ethics Research Committee, Rajavithi hospital, 6) Human Ethics Research Committee, Pathum Thani hospital, 7) Human Ethics Research Committee, Nopparat Vajira hospital, 8) Human Ethics Research Committee, Samutsakhon hospital, 9) Human Ethics Research Committee, Samutprakan hospital, and 10) Human Ethics Research Committee, Krathumbaen hospital. After receiving the ethical approval, permission to access the patient’s profile or labor record was obtained from each hospital's director. In addition, written informed consent was obtained from all participants before the beginning of data collection. The methodology was carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chairat, T., Ratinthorn, A., Limruangrong, P. et al. Prevalence and related factors of inappropriate gestational weight gain among pregnant women with overweight/ obesity in Thailand. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 23, 319 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05635-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05635-0

Keywords

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

ISSN: 1471-2393

Contact us