Skip to main content
Download PDF

Dynamics of gut microbiota during pregnancy in women with TPOAb-positive subclinical hypothyroidism: a prospective cohort study

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth volume 22, Article number: 592 (2022) Cite this article

A Correction to this article was published on 06 August 2022

This article has been updated

Abstract

Background

Anti-thyroid peroxidase antibody (TPOAb) positivity can contribute to inhibit thyroxine synthesis. Gut microbiota can interact with metabolic or immune diseases. However, dynamics of gut microbiota from the second (T2) to the third trimester (T3) in women with TPOAb-positive/negative subclinical hypothyroidism (TPOAb+/TPOAb− SCH) have not been reported. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate whether gut microbiota can be potential therapeutic targets for managing TPOAb+ SCH.

Methods

In this single-center prospective cohort study, we observed gut microbiota dynamics by sequencing 16S rRNA from fecal samples collected in T2 (20–23+ 6 weeks) and T3 (28–33+ 6 weeks). TPOAb+/TPOAb− SCH were stratified depending on whether or not they used levothyroxine (LT4) during the pregnancy (LT4+/LT4−). Microbiome bioinformatics analyses were performed using QIIME2. The linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) was used for the quantitative analysis of biomarkers. Functional profiling was performed with PICRUSt2.

Results

Distinct gut microbiota dynamics from T2 to T3 were noted in the TPOAb− (n = 68) and TPOAb+ (n = 64) SCH groups. The TPOAb+ LT4− group was characterized by enriched bacterial amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) of Prevotella in T2 and Bacteria, Lachnospirales, Lachnospiraceae, Blautia, and Agathobacter in T3 and by depleted ASVs of Gammaproteobacteria, Enterobacterales, and Enterobacteriaceae in T2 and Actinobacteriota, Coriobacteriia, Actinobacteria, Coriobacteriales, Bifidobacteriales, Bifidobacteriaceae, Bifidobacterium, Dorea formicigenerans, and Bifidobacterium longum in T3. The TPOAb+ LT4+ group was characterized by enriched bacterial ASVs of Blautia, Streptococcus salivarius, and Bifidobacterium longum in T3 and by depleted ASVs of Bacteroidota, Bacteroidia, Bacteroidales, and Prevotella in T2 and Agathobacter in T3. Moreover, we identified 53 kinds of metabolic functions that were mainly involved in sugar, lipid, and amino acid metabolism.

Conclusions

Our results indicated that low dynamics of gut microbiota composition and high dynamics of its metabolic function from T2 to T3 were associated with TPOAb+ SCH. We concluded that gut microbiota could be new targets for treatment of TPOAb+ SCH during pregnancy.

Trial registration

This study was retrospectively registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration number ChiCTR2100047175) on June 10, 2021.

Peer Review reports

Background

Based on the 2017 American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines, subclinical hypothyroidism (SCH) in pregnancy refers to the elevation of thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) level with normal free T4 (FT4) levels [1]; this occurs in 3–8% of women during the child-bearing period [2]. The 2017 ATA guidelines [1] recommend the establishment of trimester-specific reference ranges of serum TSH levels. The prevalence of SCH during pregnancy varies because of differences in trimester-specific reference ranges of TSH levels [3,4,5]. Numerous studies have associated SCH with increased adverse pregnancy and negative perinatal outcomes, including gestational hypertension, placental abruption, preterm delivery, fetal distress, neonatal death, and intrauterine growth restriction [2, 6,7,8,9]. One third of women with SCH have been reported to show positivity for anti-thyroid peroxidase antibody (TPOAb+) [10]. Studies in this discipline have also evidenced that TPOAb+ SCH is linked with adverse outcomes, including spontaneous abortion, preterm birth, and poor neural development of offsprings [11,12,13,14]. The 2017 ATA guidelines recommend that SCH women be prescribed levothyroxine (LT4) supplementation treatment for the prevention of abortion and preterm birth, regardless of TPOAb status [1]. Specifically, some studies have reported that LT4 treatment could reduce the chances of abortion and preterm delivery among pregnant women with TPOAb+ SCH [15, 16].

Intestinal microbiota, which include millions of microorganisms, sustain homeostasis by interacting with the host [17, 18]. Furthermore, metabolites of intestinal bacteria, such as short chain fatty acids (SCFAs), can impact intestinal barrier and signaling pathways [19]; this further affects the absorption of microelements, bile acid, deiodinase, and glucuronic acid (which jointly maintain normal thyroid function) [20].

In most studies, women with TPOAb+/TPOAb-negative (TPOAb−) SCH have been enrolled in the first trimester (T1). However, the dynamics of gut microbiota during the second (T2) and third trimesters (T3) in women with TPOAb+/TPOAb− SCH have not been reported. In this single-center, prospective observational cohort study, we aim to observe the differences in the dynamics of gut microbiota composition and metabolic function from T2 to T3 in pregnant women with TPOAb+ and TPOAb− SCH. To achieve this, we performed 16S rRNA sequencing of fecal samples of 64 and 68 women with TPOAb+ and TPOAb− SCH, respectively. This study can show whether intestinal microbiota could be new targets for the treatment of TPOAb+ SCH during pregnancy.

Methods

Study population

This nested, prospective observational cohort study was conducted in the Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University between June 2020 and May 2021. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital (No. 2018-KY-003-01, 2018-KY-003-02). All participants provided written informed consent. This study was recorded at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration number ChiCTR2100047175). All procedures conformed to the Declaration of Helsinki.

Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) presence of singleton pregnancy; (2) recruitment at a gestational age of 6–13+ 6 weeks; (3) diagnosis of SCH based on thyroid function testing during T1; and (4) provision of informed consent.

Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) occurrence of abortion or loss to follow-up; (2) history of other severe systemic autoimmune diseases; (3) history of severe heart, liver, kidney, lung, and/or other organ dysfunctions; (4) random adjustments to the daily dose of LT4; (5) failure to collect a fecal sample during T2 or T3; (6) use of antibiotics or probiotics 1 month prior to the collection of the fecal sample; (7) use of medications that affect thyroid function; (8) presence of endemic goiter; or (9) history of mental illness.

Group design

In T1, pregnant women were screened for thyroid function, according to China’s Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Thyroid Diseases, Pregnancy and Postpartum (Second Edition), 2019. Serum FT4 (enzyme immunoassay), TSH3UL (enzyme immunoassay), and TPOAb levels were detected using an automatic chemiluminescence immunoanalyzer (CENTAUR XP, Siemens, USA). The women’s clinical chemistry and hemoglobin levels were monitored with an automatic biochemical analyzer (CI16200, Abbott, USA) and a blood cell analyzer (XN2000, Sysmex, Japanese), respectively.

TPOAb+ SCH was defined by a TSH3UL level > 3.56 mIU/L, an FT4 level within the range of 11.80–18.40 pmol/L, and a TPOAb level > 60.00 U/mL. TPOAb− SCH was defined by a TSH3UL level > 3.56 mIU/L, an FT4 level within the range of 11.80–18.40 pmol/L, and a TPOAb level within the range of 0.00–60.00 U/mL. TPOAb+/TPOAb− women with SCH were stratified according to whether or not they were administered LT4 treatment during pregnancy (LT4+ or LT4−, respectively) (Supplementary Fig. 1).

Fecal sample collection

Fecal samples were collected in T2 (20–23+ 6 weeks) and T3 (28–33+ 6 weeks) and analyzed using the PSP® Spin Stool DNA Plus Kit (SARSTEDT, Germany). Pregnant women collected their fecal samples in clean plastic bags after urination. Duplicate samples from the middle of the stool were preserved in individual sterile tubes. Fecal samples were transported to the hospital on the day they were collected and stored at − 80 °C until analysis.

16S rRNA amplicon sequencing and analysis

Total genomic DNA was extracted using the sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS] and cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide [CTAB] methods, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The hypervariable V3–V4 regions of the bacterial 16S rRNA genes were amplified using the following primers: 341F (5′-CCTAYGGGRBGCASCAG-3′) and 806R (5′-GGACTACNNGGGTATCTAAT-3′). All PCR reactions were performed under the following conditions: 15 μL of Phusion® High-Fidelity PCR Master Mix (New England Biolabs), 0.2 μM of forward and reverse primers, and approximately 10 ng template DNA. Thermal cycling involved initial denaturation at 98 °C for 1 min, followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 98 °C for 10 s, annealing at 50 °C for 30 s, extension at 72 °C for 30 s, and finally elongation at 72 °C for 5 min. PCR products were detected with 2% agarose gel electrophoresis. PCR products were mixed in equidensity ratios and purified using the Qiagen Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen, Germany). Sequencing libraries were generated using the TruSeq® DNA PCR-Free Sample Preparation Kit (Illumina, USA), and index codes were added. Library quality was assessed using a Qubit@ 2.0 Fluorometer (Thermo Scientific) and an Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 system. The library was sequenced on an Illumina NovaSeq platform and 250 bp paired-end reads were generated.

Microbiome bioinformatics analyses were carried out with QIIME2 (2021.04) [21]. Using the DADA2 plugin, sequences were quality filtered, denoised, and merged; chimeras were removed [22]. Species annotation was performed using QIIME2. On the basis of the Silva Database (Release138, https://www.arb-silva.de) [23], we performed 16S annotation. Non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis sum-rank test was used to analyze differences in α-diversity indices and similarity distance among different groups. The α-diversity indices (Chao1, Shannon, Simpson, and Abundance-based Coverage Estimator [ACE]) were calculated with QIIME2 and displayed with R software. The β-diversity was calculated using unweighted and weighted unifrac with QIIME2. The PerMANOVA analysis was performed on the distance matrices to illustrate the significance of β-diversity analysis. A matrix of unweighted or weighted unifrac distances was transformed into a new set of orthogonal axes, where the maximum variation factor was demonstrated by the first principal coordinate axis (PCoA1), and the second maximum variation factor was demonstrated by the second principal coordinate axis (PCoA2). The two-dimensional PCoA results were displayed using the ade package and ggplot2 package in R (Version 3.6.2). The linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size (LEfSe) (Online tool address http://huttenhower.sph.harvard.edu/galaxy/) [24] was used for the quantitative analysis of biomarkers (LDA score threshold: 2 or 4). Functional profiling was performed using Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States (PICRUSt2) (Online tool address https://github.com/picrust/picrust2) [25] with a single script (PICRUSt2_pipeline. Py).

Statistical analysis of clinical data

EpiData was used for double data entry and validation. SPSS 26.0 software was used for statistical analysis of clinical data. Normally and non-normally distributed continuous variables are reported as means ± standard deviations and as medians with quartiles, respectively, and were compared using the independent samples Student’s t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test, respectively. Categorical variables are reported as frequency [n (%)]. Rank categorical variables were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test; other categorical variables were compared using the chi-square test. P < 0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Clinical characteristics of subjects

A total of 64 and 68 women with TPOAb+ and TPOAb− SCH, respectively, during pregnancy were included in this study. Women with TPOAb+ SCH were more likely to have a history of thyroid disease (37.5% vs. 14.7%, P = 0.003) and significantly higher T1 levels of total cholesterol (4.34 mmol/L vs. 3.98 mmol/L, P = 0.009), high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (1.52 mmol/L vs. 1.39 mmol/L, P = 0.037), and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (2.38 mmol/L vs. 2.08 mmol/L, P = 0.036) than those with TPOAb− SCH. Other clinical characteristics were not significantly different between groups (Table 1).

Table 1 Demographic and clinical characteristics of the study participants
Full size table

Stratification according to LT4 treatment status during pregnancy was as follows: TPOAb+ LT4− (AZ1 or AW1) group, 8 women in T2 or T3; TPOAb− LT4− (BZ1 or BW1) group, 18 women in T2 or T3; TPOAb+ LT4+ (AZ2 or AW2) group, 56 women in T2 or T3; and TPOAb− LT4+ (BZ2 or BW2) group, 50 women in T2 or T3 (Supplementary Fig. 1).

Composition of gut microbiota

From 264 fecal samples, 21,112,489 effective reads were obtained. A total of 17,777,893 high-quality reads, including 22,947 amplicon sequence variants (ASVs), were identified after sequence denoising or clustering (Fig. 1A). There were 329 common ASVs across the eight subgroups of TPOAb+/− women with SCH stratified according to LT4 treatment status (Fig. 1A). The numbers of ASVs unique to T2 and T3 in each subgroup were as follows: TPOAb+ LT4− (AZ1 or AW1) group, 1112 and 904, respectively; TPOAb− LT4− (BZ1 or BW1) group, 2392 and 1786, respectively; TPOAb+ LT4+ (AZ2 or AW2) group, 5204 and 3607, respectively; and TPOAb− LT4+ (BZ2 or BW2) group, 4362 and 3251, respectively (Fig. 1A). A number of ASVs could be classified to the family (n = 3409), genus (n = 11,449) and species (n = 6815) levels (Fig. 1B). Taxonomic analysis showed that Firmicutes and Bacteroidota were the dominant phyla, followed by Actinobacteriota and Proteobacteria (Fig. 1C). Bacteroides, Faecalibacterium, Bifidobacterium, Subdoligranulum, Prevotella, Lachnospira, Megamonas and Agathobacter were the predominant genera (Fig. 1D). There were differences in ACE indices and Chao1 indices between T2 and T3 in the TPOAb− LT4− (P = 0.015 and 0.008, respectively), T2 and T3 TPOAb+ LT4+ (P = 0.004 and 0.008, respectively), T2 and T3 TPOAb− LT4+ (P = 0.026 and 0.029, respectively) groups. There were no differences in ACE and Chao1 indices between T2 and T3 in the TPOAb+ LT4− group. Furthermore, there were no differences in the Shannon and Simpson indices between T2 and T3 in the TPOAb+ LT4−, TPOAb− LT4−, TPOAb+ LT4+, and TPOAb− LT4+ groups (Fig. 2 and Supplementary Table 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flower diagram, bar chart and taxonomic analysis. A Flower diagram showing the number of common and unique amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) among the eight subgroups. Different subgroups are represented by different colors. Petals indicate the ASVs unique to each subgroup. The core shows the common ASVs across the subgroups. B Bar chart showing a number of ASVs classified to the family, genus, and species levels. C-D Taxonomic analysis. AZ1, TPOAb+-LT4−-T2, women in T2 with TPOAb-positive SCH and no LT4 treatment; AW1, TPOAb+-LT4−-T3, women in T3 with TPOAb-positive SCH and no LT4 treatment; BZ1, TPOAb−-LT4−-T2, women in T2 with TPOAb-negative SCH and no LT4 treatment; BW1, TPOAb−-LT4−-T3, women in T3 with TPOAb-negative SCH and no LT4 treatment; AZ2, TPOAb+-LT4+-T2, women in T2 with TPOAb-positive SCH and LT4 treatment; AW2, TPOAb+-LT4+-T3, women in T3 with TPOAb-positive SCH and LT4 treatment; BZ2, TPOAb−-LT4+-T2, women in T2 with TPOAb-negative SCH and LT4 treatment; BW2, TPOAb−-LT4+-T3, women in T3 with TPOAb-negative SCH and LT4 treatment

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

The α-diversity analysis. A-D α-diversity index (ACE, Chao1, Shannon, and Simpson) analysis. * P < 0.05. AZ1, TPOAb+-LT4−-T2; AW1, TPOAb+-LT4−-T3; BZ1, TPOAb−-LT4−-T2; BW1, TPOAb−-LT4−-T3; AZ2, TPOAb+-LT4+-T2; AW2, TPOAb+-LT4+-T3; BZ2, TPOAb−-LT4+-T2; BW2, TPOAb−-LT4+-T3

Full size image

The rarefaction curve of intestinal flora indicated that the number of ASVs analyzed was sufficient, and the distribution and abundance of species in each subgroup were high and adequate for data analysis (Fig. 3A). The results of PerMANOVA analysis were shown (Table 2). With respect to β-diversity, unweighted unifrac calculation revealed that PCoA1 and PCoA2 explained 12.9 and 9.3%, respectively, of the observed variation in the taxonomic profiles of intestinal microbiota between subgroups; β-diversity between T2 and T3 in the TPOAb+ LT4− (PCoA2, P = 0.046), TPOAb− LT4− (PCoA2, P = 0.009), TPOAb+ LT4+ (PCoA2, P = 0.018), and TPOAb− LT4+ (PCoA2, P = 0.001) groups were significantly different (Fig. 3B, D-E and Supplementary Table 2). However, weighted unifrac calculation revealed that PCoA1 and PCoA2 explained 24.6 and 22%, respectively, of the observed results; β-diversity between T2 and T3 in the TPOAb− LT4− (PCoA2, P = 0.001), TPOAb+ LT4+ (PCoA2, P = 7.79E-07), and TPOAb− LT4+ (PCoA2, P = 1.92E-09) groups were significantly different; there were no significant differences in β-diversity between T2 and T3 in the TPOAb+ LT4− group (Fig. 3C, F-G and Supplementary Table 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Rarefaction curves and β-diversity analysis. A Refraction curves based on random extraction of sequencing data from fecal samples from the eight subgroups. B, D-E β-diversity analysis conducted with the unweighted unifrac algorithm. C, F-G β-diversity analysis conducted with the weighted unifrac algorithm. * P < 0.05. AZ1, TPOAb+-LT4−-T2; AW1, TPOAb+-LT4−-T3; BZ1, TPOAb−-LT4−-T2; BW1, TPOAb−-LT4−-T3; AZ2, TPOAb+-LT4+-T2; AW2, TPOAb+-LT4+-T3; BZ2, TPOAb−-LT4+-T2; BW2, TPOAb−-LT4+-T3

Full size image
Table 2 The results of PerMANOVA
Full size table

Dynamics of gut microbiota composition from T2 to T3

LEfSe analysis of differential species abundance was applied to identify intestinal microbiota that served as markers to distinguish TPOAb+ and TPOAb− women with SCH during pregnancy. LEfSe analysis revealed 7 taxa showing different abundances between T2 and T3 in the TPOAb+ LT4− group. Specifically, 2 and 5 taxa indicated greater and lesser abundances, respectively, in T2 than in T3. Moreover, 13 taxa were significantly different between T2 and T3 in the TPOAb− LT4− group. Specifically, 4 and 9 taxa showed greater and lesser abundances, respectively, in T2 than in T3. Intriguingly, genus Faecalibacterium had greater abundances in both these groups during T2 than during T3. The intestinal microbiota in the TPOAb+ LT4− group were characterized by the enrichment of bacterial ASVs of the genus Prevotella in T2 and the kingdom Bacteria, order Lachnospirales, family Lachnospiraceae, and genera Blautia and Agathobacter in T3, as well as depletion of ASVs of the class Gammaproteobacteria, order Enterobacterales, and family Enterobacteriaceae in T2, and the phylum Actinobacteriota, classes Coriobacteriia and Actinobacteria, orders Coriobacteriales and Bifidobacteriales, family Bifidobacteriaceae, genus Bifidobacterium, and species Dorea formicigenerans and Bifidobacterium longum in T3 (Fig. 4A-D and Supplementary Table 4); the LEfSe analysis also revealed 14 taxa that showed different abundances between T2 and T3 in the TPOAb+ LT4+ group. Specifically, 3 and 11 taxa showed greater and lesser abundances, respectively, in T2 than in T3. Moreover, 16 taxa showed distinct abundances between T2 and T3 in the TPOAb− LT4+ group. Specifically, 7 and 9 taxa exhibited greater and lesser abundances, respectively, in T2 than in T3. Intriguingly, 11 taxa showed consistent shifts in both groups. Specifically, 3 taxa (the order Oscillospirales, family Ruminococcaceae, and genus Faecalibacterium) showed greater abundances in both these groups in T2 than in T3, but 8 taxa (the phylum Actinobacteriota, classes Bacilli and Actinobacteria, orders Bifidobacteriales and Lachnospirales, families Bifidobacteriaceae and Lachnospiraceae, and genus Bifidobacterium) exhibited greater abundances in T3 than in T2. The intestinal microbiota in the TPOAb+ LT4+ group were characterized by the enrichment of bacterial ASVs of the genus Blautia, and species Streptococcus salivarius and Bifidobacterium longum in T3, and the depletion of ASVs of the phylum Bacteroidota, class Bacteroidia, order Bacteroidales, and genus Prevotella in T2 and the genus Agathobacter in T3 (Fig. 4E-H and Supplementary Table 5).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Intestinal microbiota as markers in TPOAb-positive women with SCH. A-B T2 vs. T3 in women with TPOAb-positive SCH and no LT4 treatment. C-D T2 vs. T3 in women with TPOAb-negative SCH and no LT4 treatment. E-F T2 vs. T3 in women with TPOAb-positive SCH and LT4 treatment. G-H T2 vs. T3 in women with TPOAb-negative SCH and LT4 treatment. LDA value distribution histogram: the green and red bars indicate higher abundance of intestinal microbiota in T2 and T3, respectively. Cladograms: circles radiating from the inside to the outside represent taxonomic levels from phylum to species. AZ1, TPOAb+-LT4−-T2; AW1, TPOAb+-LT4−-T3; BZ1, TPOAb−-LT4−-T2; BW1, TPOAb−-LT4−-T3; AZ2, TPOAb+-LT4+-T2; AW2, TPOAb+-LT4+-T3; BZ2, TPOAb−-LT4+-T2; BW2, TPOAb−-LT4+-T3

Full size image

Dynamics of gut microbiota function from T2 to T3

LEfSe analysis of differential functional abundance based on the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway map can further predict the metabolic functions of the intestinal microbiota that serve as markers to distinguish TPOAb+ and TPOAb− women with SCH during pregnancy. A total of 53 metabolic functions were discriminated between TPOAb+ and TPOAb− women with SCH. The intestinal microbiota in the TPOAb+ LT4− group were characterized by the enrichment of 10 metabolic functions (including alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolism) in T2 and 11 metabolic functions (including pentose phosphate pathway) in T3 and by the depletion of 3 metabolic functions in T2, 3 metabolic functions (including galactose metabolism; phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan biosynthesis) in T3 (Fig. 5A, B and Supplementary Table 6). The intestinal microbiota in the TPOAb+ LT4+ group were characterized by the enrichment of 5 metabolic functions (including histidine metabolism) in T2 and 17 metabolic functions (including glycolysis and gluconeogenesis; pentose phosphate pathway; glutathione, taurine, and hypotaurine metabolism; phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan biosynthesis; fatty acid metabolism) in T3 and by the depletion of 2 metabolic functions (including pentose and glucuronate interconversions) in T2 and 2 metabolic functions (including tryptophan metabolism) in T3 (Fig. 5C, D and Supplementary Table 7).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Functional profiling performed with PICRUSt2 based on the KEGG pathway map [43]. A T2 vs. T3 in women with TPOAb-positive SCH and no LT4 treatment. B T2 vs. T3 in women with TPOAb-negative SCH and no LT4 treatment. C T2 vs. T3 in women with TPOAb-positive SCH and LT4 treatment. D T2 vs. T3 in women with TPOAb-negative SCH and LT4 treatment. LDA value distribution histogram: the green and red bars indicate the metabolic functions with higher abundance in T2 and T3, respectively. AZ1, TPOAb+-LT4−-T2; AW1, TPOAb+-LT4−-T3; BZ1, TPOAb−-LT4−-T2; BW1, TPOAb−-LT4−-T3; AZ2, TPOAb+-LT4+-T2; AW2, TPOAb+-LT4+-T3; BZ2, TPOAb−-LT4+-T2; BW2, TPOAb−-LT4+-T3

Full size image

Discussion

In this single-center prospective cohort study, we described the dynamics of composition and metabolic function of intestinal microbiota in TPOAb+/− women with SCH from T2 to T3. To our knowledge, this is the first study to have supported that women who were diagnosed with TPOAb+ SCH in T1 show distinct dynamics of gut microbiota from T2 to T3.

Previous studies have found that the frequency of female subjects with a family history of thyroid disease was higher in the SCH group than in the control group [26]. Our findings further indicated that TPOAb+ women with SCH are more likely to have a history of thyroid disease and show higher total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol levels in T1 than their TPOAb− counterparts. However, the levels of these three parameters in TPOAb+/− women with SCH in T1 were all within the normal range. It is well known that dietary habits have an effect on the composition of gut microbiota [27]. Therefore, this study minimized the influence of varying dietary habits across regions on intestinal microbiota. The baseline characteristics (such as ethnicity, culture and economic status) that affect dietary habits have shown no statistical differences. We concluded that women with a prior history of thyroid disease might be more likely to suffer from TPOAb+ SCH than those without such history.

The α-diversity reflects the microbial community diversity within the sample. While Chao1 index and ACE index measure species abundances, Shannon index and Simpson index are used to measure species diversities. The β-diversity analysis compares the degree of similarity in species diversity between different samples. In this study, unweighted and weighted unifrac calculations were used to analyze β-diversity. Unweighted unifrac calculation compares the presence or absence of species, while both species availability and species abundance need to be considered in weighted unifrac calculation. Intriguingly, inconsistent results of β-diversity, determined using unweighted and weighted unifrac calculations, between T2 and T3 in the TPOAb+ LT4− group can be explained by the stricter definitions of weighted unifrac calculation. These findings provided the first evidence of diversity between T2 and T3 in women with TPOAb+/− SCH.

The results from LEfSe analysis showed the apparently low taxonomic variability and high functional variability of gut microbiota from T2 to T3 in women with TPOAb+ SCH; this implies that dysbiosis of gut microbiota continued until late pregnancy. In the absence of LT4 treatment, we screened out six kinds of bacteria (genus Prevotella in T2 and kingdom Bacteria, order Lachnospirales, family Lachnospiraceae, and genera Blautia and Agathobacter in T3) as special bacteria for TPOAb+ women with SCH, and these were found to be involved in sugar and amino acid metabolism (alanine, aspartate, and glutamate metabolism; pentose phosphate pathway); in the presence of LT4 treatment, we distinguished three kinds of special bacteria for TPOAb+ women with SCH (genus Blautia, species Streptococcus salivarius and Bifidobacterium longum in T3), and these were found to be involved in sugar, lipid, and amino acid metabolism (glycolysis and gluconeogenesis; pentose phosphate pathway; fatty acid metabolism; phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan biosynthesis; glutathione, taurine, and hypotaurine metabolism; histidine metabolism). Especially, bacteria of genus Blautia were screened out as special bacteria for TPOAb+ LT4+/− women. Bacteria of genus Blautia are obligate, anaerobic commensals that belong to family Lachnospiraceae [28]. Luu et al. discovered that the presence of bacteria of genus Blautia is negatively related to the prognosis of early-stage breast cancer [29]. Genus Blautia, which produces high levels of butyrate, was found to be more relevant to subjects with psoriasis than to non-psoriasis controls; however, this finding was not consistent with traditional observations in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases [30, 31]. Inflammation was positively linked with genus Blautia [32]. Remarkably, it has been reported that patients with cystic fibrosis were less likely to respond to inhaled aztreonam therapy when they showed abundance of genus Prevotella in the lung microbiome [33]. We predicted that genus Prevotella may affect the efficacy of LT4 drug therapy in patients with SCH. Genus Prevotella has been related to autoimmunity [34]. Moreover, genus Agathobacter were positively correlated with genus Prevotella [35]. In addition, abundance of family Lachnospiraceae, which belongs to order Lachnospirales, increased in subjects with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in a previous study [36]; species Streptococcus salivarius was implicated in endophthalmitis [37]. However, species Bifidobacterium longum is probiotic, has an anti-inflammatory effect, and can be used to treat ulcerative colitis [38]. Therefore, findings of earlier studies support that these special bacteria, except for species Bifidobacterium longum, can be associated with diseases.

With respect to the absence of LT4 treatment, twelve kinds of bacteria (class Gammaproteobacteria, order Enterobacterales, and family Enterobacteriaceae in T2, phylum Actinobacteriota, classes Coriobacteriia and Actinobacteria, orders Coriobacteriales and Bifidobacteriales, family Bifidobacteriaceae, genus Bifidobacterium, and species Dorea formicigenerans and Bifidobacterium longum in T3) were considered as special bacteria for TPOAb− women with SCH, and these were found to be involved in sugar and amino acid metabolism (galactose metabolism; phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan_biosynthesis). In the presence of LT4 treatment, five kinds of special bacteria were identified for TPOAb− women with SCH (phylum Bacteroidota, class Bacteroidia, order Bacteroidales, and genus Prevotella in T2 and genus Agathobacter in T3), and these were found to be involved in sugar and amino acid metabolism (pentose and glucuronate interconversions; tryptophan metabolism). Earlier studies showed that subjects with GDM were characterized by a decrease in the abundance of members of family Enterobacteriaceae [36]. SCFAs, which are produced by species Dorea formicigenerans, may suppress the production of proinflammatory cytokines [39, 40]. Order Coriobacteriales, belonging to class Coriobacteriia, is characterized by lactic acid production [41]. Inflammation was negatively linked with genus Bacteroides [42]. Therefore, earlier study results support that these special bacteria, except for those belonging to genera Prevotella and Agathobacter, can be considered for the treatment of diseases.

In addition, we found that LT4 supplementation treatment can increase the abundance of beneficial bacteria (species Bifidobacterium longum in T3) in TPOAb+ women with SCH, which is consistent with the high recommendation of LT4 treatment for TPOAb+ women with SCH; however, LT4 supplementation can increase the abundance of harmful bacteria (genus Prevotella in T2 and genus Agathobacter in T3) in TPOAb− women with SCH, which is consistent with the fact that LT4 treatment is appropriate recommended for TPOAb− women with SCH. Although the roles and mechanisms of intestinal microbiota in pregnant TPOAb+ women with SCH remain to be elucidated, this study has suggested their involvement mainly in sugar, lipid, and amino acid metabolism. These findings provided the first evidence implying that composition and function of intestinal microbiota vary between women with TPOAb+ and TPOAb− SCH from T2 to T3 in the presence or absence of LT4 treatment.

A limitation to this study is that it was conducted in a single center, and the normal ranges of TSH, FT4, and TPOAb in T1 varied from hospital to hospital. Another limitation is that dietary habits of pregnant women were not recorded in detail; their contribution to the gut microbiota of pregnant women could not be determined in the study. However, all the participants in this study have lived in Beijing. This study has minimized the influence of varying dietary habits across regions on gut microbiota.

Conclusions

In conclusion, this single-center prospective cohort study found that women with TPOAb+ SCH exhibited a low gut microbiota variation and a high variation in its metabolic function from T2 to T3 in the presence or absence of LT4 treatment. The metabolic functions of different gut microbiota mainly included sugar, lipid, and amino acid metabolism. Changes in the abundances of three kinds of bacteria (species Bifidobacterium longum in T3, genus Prevotella in T2, and genus Agathobacter in T3) were abnormal in the presence of LT4 treatment. These findings suggest that gut microbiota can serve as potential therapeutic targets for TPOAb+ SCH during pregnancy. Further studies are needed to explore the causality between intestinal microbiota dynamics and TPOAb+ SCH and to, thereby, validate potential therapeutic targets.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and analysed during the current study are available in the NCBI repository, https://www.ncbi.nlm. nih.gov/, PRJNA751915. We want to keep the datasets private until acceptance.

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this article and its supplementary information files.

Change history

Abbreviations

TPOAb:

Anti-thyroid peroxidase antibody

T2:

The second trimester

T3:

The third trimester

SCH:

Subclinical hypothyroidism

LT4 :

Levothyroxine

LDA:

Linear discriminant analysis

LEfSe:

Linear discriminant analysis effect size

ASVs:

Amplicon sequence variants

ATA:

American Thyroid Association

TSH:

Thyroid stimulation hormone

FT4 :

Free T4

SCFAs:

Short chain fatty acids

T1:

The first trimester

PCoA1:

The first principal coordinate axis

PCoA2:

The second principal coordinate axis

PICRUSt:

Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States

GDM:

Gestational diabetes mellitus

References

  1. Alexander EK, Pearce EN, Brent GA, Brown RS, Chen H, Dosiou C, et al. 2017 guidelines of the American Thyroid Association for the diagnosis and management of thyroid disease during pregnancy and the postpartum. Thyroid. 2017;27(3):315–89. https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2016.0457.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Maraka S, Ospina NM, O'Keeffe DT, Espinosa De Ycaza AE, Gionfriddo MR, Erwin PJ, et al. Subclinical hypothyroidism in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Thyroid. 2016;26(4):580–90. https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2015.0418.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Springer D, Jiskra J, Limanova Z, Zima T, Potlukova E. Thyroid in pregnancy: from physiology to screening. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2017;54(2):102–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408363.2016.1269309.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fan J, Zhang Y, Zhang C, Barjaktarovic M, Yang X, Peeters RP, et al. Persistency of thyroid dysfunction from early to late pregnancy. Thyroid. 2019;29(10):1475–84. https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2019.0115.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dong AC, Stagnaro-Green A. Differences in diagnostic criteria mask the true prevalence of thyroid disease in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Thyroid. 2019;29(2):278–89. https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2018.0475.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tong Z, Xiaowen Z, Baomin C, Aihua L, Yingying Z, Weiping T, et al. The effect of subclinical maternal thyroid dysfunction and autoimmunity on intrauterine growth restriction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine. 2016;95(19):e3677. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000003677.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Fan X, Wu L. The impact of thyroid abnormalities during pregnancy on subsequent neuropsychological development of the offspring: a meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(24):3971–6. https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2016.1152248.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Turunen S, Vääräsmäki M, Männistö T, Hartikainen AL, Lahesmaa-Korpinen AM, Gissler M, et al. Pregnancy and perinatal outcome among hypothyroid mothers: a population-based cohort study. Thyroid. 2019;29(1):135–41. https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2018.0311.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Consortium on Thyroid and Pregnancy—Study Group on Preterm Birth, Korevaar TIM, Derakhshan A, Taylor PN, Meima M, Chen L, et al. Association of thyroid function test abnormalities and thyroid autoimmunity with preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2019;322(7):632–41. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.10931.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Korevaar TI, de Rijke YB, Chaker L, Medici M, Jaddoe VW, Steegers EA, et al. Stimulation of thyroid function by human chorionic gonadotropin during pregnancy: a risk factor for thyroid disease and a mechanism for known risk factors. Thyroid. 2017;27(3):440–50. https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2016.0527.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dhillon-Smith RK, Middleton LJ, Sunner KK, Cheed V, Baker K, Farrell-Carver S, et al. Levothyroxine in women with thyroid peroxidase antibodies before conception. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(14):1316–25. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1812537.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu H, Shan Z, Li C, Mao J, Xie X, Wang W, et al. Maternal subclinical hypothyroidism, thyroid autoimmunity, and the risk of miscarriage: a prospective cohort study. Thyroid. 2014;24(11):1642–9. https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2014.0029.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Tingi E, Syed AA, Kyriacou A, Mastorakos G, Kyriacou A. Benign thyroid disease in pregnancy: a state of the art review. J Clin Transl Endocrinol. 2016;6:37–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcte.2016.11.001.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Derakhshan A, Korevaar TIM, Taylor PN, Levie D, Guxens M, Jaddoe VWV, et al. The association of maternal thyroid autoimmunity during pregnancy with child IQ. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018;103(10):3729–36. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2018-00743.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Maraka S, Mwangi R, McCoy RG, Yao X, Sangaralingham LR, Singh Ospina NM, et al. Thyroid hormone treatment among pregnant women with subclinical hypothyroidism: US national assessment. BMJ. 2017;356:i6865. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6865.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Nazarpour S, Ramezani Tehrani F, Simbar M, Tohidi M, Alavi Majd H, Azizi F. Effects of levothyroxine treatment on pregnancy outcomes in pregnant women with autoimmune thyroid disease. Eur J Endocrinol. 2017;176(2):253–65. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-16-0548.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sittipo P, Lobionda S, Lee YK, Maynard CL. Intestinal microbiota and the immune system in metabolic diseases. J Microbiol. 2018;56(3):154–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12275-018-7548-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sommer F, Anderson JM, Bharti R, Raes J, Rosenstiel P. The resilience of the intestinal microbiota influences health and disease. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2017;15(10):630–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro.2017.58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sun M, Wu W, Liu Z, Cong Y. Microbiota metabolite short chain fatty acids, GPCR, and inflammatory bowel diseases. J Gastroenterol. 2017;52(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-016-1242-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Duszka K, Wahli W. Enteric microbiota−Gut−Brain Axis from the perspective of nuclear receptors. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(8):2210. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19082210.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Bolyen E, Rideout JR, Dillon MR, Bokulich NA, Abnet CC, Al-Ghalith GA, et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37:852–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-019-0209-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJ, Holmes SP. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods. 2016;13(7):581–3. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3869.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(Database issue):D590–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks1219.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Segata N, Izard J, Waldron L, Gevers D, Miropolsky L, Garrett WS, et al. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biol. 2011;12(6):R60. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2011-12-6-r60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Douglas GM, Maffei VJ, Zaneveld JR, Yurgel SN, Brown JR, Taylor CM, et al. PICRUSt2 for prediction of metagenome functions. Nat Biotechnol. 2020;38(6):685–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-020-0548-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Rafiq-Uddin M, Kamrul-Hasan AB, Asaduzzaman M, Aminul-Islam AK, Islam M, Rauniyar BK, et al. Antithyroid antibody status in non-pregnant adult Bangladeshi patients with subclinical hypothyroidism. Mymensingh Med J. 2020;29(1):156–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Qian L, Gao R, Hong L, Pan C, Li H, Huang J, et al. Association analysis of dietary habits with gut microbiota of a native Chinese community. Exp Ther Med. 2018;16(2):856–66. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2018.6249.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Durand GA, Pham T, Ndongo S, Traore SI, Dubourg G, Lagier JC, et al. Blautia massiliensis sp. nov., isolated from a fresh human fecal sample and emended description of the genus Blautia. Anaerobe. 2017;43:47–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2016.12.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Luu TH, Michel C, Bard JM, Dravet F, Nazih H, Bobin-Dubigeon C. Intestinal proportion of Blautia sp. is associated with clinical stage and histoprognostic grade in patients with early-stage breast cancer. Nutr Cancer. 2017;69(2):267–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/01635581.2017.1263750.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lavelle A, Sokol H. Gut microbiota-derived metabolites as key actors in inflammatory bowel disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;17(4):223–37. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41575-019-0258-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lloyd-Price J, Arze C, Ananthakrishnan AN, Schirmer M, Avila-Pacheco J, Poon TW, et al. Multi-omics of the gut microbial ecosystem in inflammatory bowel diseases. Nature. 2019;569(7758):655–62. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1237-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Crusell MKW, Hansen TH, Nielsen T, Allin KH, Rühlemann MC, Damm P, et al. Gestational diabetes is associated with change in the gut microbiota composition in third trimester of pregnancy and postpartum. Microbiome. 2018;6(1):89. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-018-0472-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Maeda Y, Takeda K. Role of gut microbiota in rheumatoid arthritis. J Clin Med. 2017;6(6):60. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm6060060.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Ishaq HM, Mohammad IS, Shahzad M, Ma C, Raza MA, Wu X, et al. Molecular alteration analysis of human gut microbial composition in Graves’ disease patients. Int J Biol Sci. 2018;14(11):1558–70. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.24151.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Lee S, You H, Lee M, Kim D, Jung S, Park Y, et al. Different reactions in each Enterotype depending on the intake of probiotic yogurt powder. Microorganisms. 2021;9(6):1277. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9061277.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang X, Liu H, Li Y, Huang S, Zhang L, Cao C, et al. Altered gut bacterial and metabolic signatures and their interaction in gestational diabetes mellitus. Gut Microbes. 2020;12(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2020.1840765.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Mehanna CJ, Kallassi L, Mansour AM, Hamam RN. Streptococcus salivarius endogenous endophthalmitis. BMJ Case Rep. 2021;14(2):e239299. https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2020-239299.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Plaza-Díaz J, Ruiz-Ojeda FJ, Vilchez-Padial LM, Gil A. Evidence of the anti-inflammatory effects of probiotics and Synbiotics in intestinal chronic diseases. Nutrients. 2017;9(6):555. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu9060555.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Vinolo MA, Rodrigues HG, Hatanaka E, Sato FT, Sampaio SC, Curi R. Suppressive effect of short-chain fatty acids on production of proinflammatory mediators by neutrophils. J Nutr Biochem. 2011;22(9):849–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnutbio.2010.07.009.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Verma S, Dutta SK, Firnberg E, Phillips L, Vinayek R, Nair PP. Identification and engraftment of new bacterial strains by shotgun metagenomic sequence analysis in patients with recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection before and after fecal microbiota transplantation and in healthy human subjects. Plos One. 2021;16(7):e0251590. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251590.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Cieciura-Włoch W, Borowski S, Domański J. Dark fermentative hydrogen production from hydrolyzed sugar beet pulp improved by iron addition. Bioresour Technol. 2020;314:123713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123713.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Moreno-Indias I, Sánchez-Alcoholado L, García-Fuentes E, Cardona F, Queipo-Ortuño MI, Tinahones FJ. Insulin resistance is associated with specific gut microbiota in appendix samples from morbidly obese patients. Am J Transl Res. 2016;8(12):5672–84.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the volunteers for participating in the study and the medical staff for collecting clinical information, fecal samples, and blood samples. We thank TopEdit Inc. for providing scientific editing services during the preparation of this manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by The National Key Research and Development Program of China (No: 2016YFC1000101) and supported by Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission (No. Z181100001718076). The funders played no role in designing the study, collecting and analyzing data, making decision to publish, or preparing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Internal Medicine, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing, 100026, China

    Min Wu, Yuxi Yang, Shan Guo, Muqing Gu, Tingting Zhang & Huimin Gao

  2. School of Nursing, Jining Medical University, Jining, 272067, China

    Cheng Chi

  3. Department of Central Laboratory, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing, 100026, China

    Tianhe Li, Ruixia Liu & Chenghong Yin

Authors
  1. Min Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Cheng Chi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yuxi Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shan Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Tianhe Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Muqing Gu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Tingting Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Huimin Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Ruixia Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Chenghong Yin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

CY, RL, and MW designed the study. MW, CC, YY, SG, MG, TZ, and HG recruited the participants and collected the data and fecal samples. MW, CC, and TL performed the microbiological analyses. MW and YY analyzed the data. MW and CC generated the figures and wrote the manuscript. CY and RL critically reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work and ensured that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ruixia Liu or Chenghong Yin.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital (No. 2018-KY-003-01, 2018-KY-003-02), and all participants provided written informed consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors have no financial disclosures.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised: the correct affiliation of author Chenghong Yin is: Department of Central Laboratory, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing 100026, China.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Supplementary Fig 1.

flow diagram TPO Ab-positive/negative women with SCH where stratified depending on whether or not they received LT4 treatment during pregnancy.

Additional file 2: Supplementary Table 1.

α-diversity indexes. Supplementary Table 2. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA1 and PCoA2) conducted with the unweighted unifrac algorithm. Supplementary Table 3. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA1 and PCoA2) conducted with the weighted unifrac algorithm. Supplementary Table 4. LEfSe analysis of differential species abundance between AZ1 and AW1, between BZ1 and BW1. Supplementary Table 5. LEfSe analysis of differential species abundance between AZ2 and AW2, between BZ2 and BW2. Supplementary Table 6. LEfSe analysis of differential functional abundance between AZ1 and AW1, between BZ1 and BW1. Supplementary Table 7. LEfSe analysis of differential functional abundance between AZ2 and AW2, between BZ2 and BW2.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, M., Chi, C., Yang, Y. et al. Dynamics of gut microbiota during pregnancy in women with TPOAb-positive subclinical hypothyroidism: a prospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 22, 592 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04923-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04923-5

Keywords

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

ISSN: 1471-2393

Contact us