Skip to main content
Download PDF

Prepregnancy body mass index, gestational weight gain, and maternal prepartum inflammation in normal pregnancies: findings from a Chinese cohort

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth volume 22, Article number: 531 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Obesity has been linked to systemic inflammation in population studies.

Objective

To examine the associations of prepregnancy body mass index (pBMI) and total gestational weight gain (tGWG) with maternal prepartum low-grade inflammation (LGI) and clinically significant inflammation (CSI) defined by serum C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration.

Methods

Five thousand four hundred seventy-six Chinese women with uncomplicated pregnancies and recorded data on pBMI and prepartum body weight were included in this study. Blood samples were drawn before delivery for high-sensitivity CRP assay. Inadequate, optimal, and excessive tGWG were defined using the Institute of Medicine's recommendation. Multivariable Poisson regressions were used to estimate relative risks (RRs) for having prepartum LGI and CSI (defined as CRP concentration 3–10 and > 10 mg/L, respectively) across pBMI and tGWG categories.

Results

The mean pBMI, mean tGWG, and median maternal prepartum CRP concentration were 20.4 kg/m2, 13.9 kg, and 3.3 mg/L, respectively. The prevalence of prepartum CSI and LGI was 7.2% and 47.8%. The adjusted RRs (95% confidence interval) of CSI for normal (18.5–24.9 kg/m2) and high (≥ 25 kg/m2) vs. low pBMI (< 18.5 kg/m2) were 1.35 (1.05–1.74) and 2.28 (1.53–3.39), respectively. The respective adjusted RRs of LGI were 1.19 (1.11–1.28) and 1.59 (1.42–1.77). The adjusted RRs for excessive vs. optimal tGWG was 1.18 (0.94–1.48) for CSI and 1.14 (1.07–1.21) for LGI.

Conclusions

Prepregnancy overweight/obesity and excessive tGWG increase the risk of maternal prepartum systemic inflammation, which further highlights the importance of weight management before and during pregnancy.

Peer Review reports

Background

C-reactive protein (CRP) is an acute-phase reactant synthesized by the hepatocytes in response to both infectious and non-infectious factors, and elevated CRP level is considered to reflect systemic inflammation [1, 2]. In general populations, positive associations have been found between increased adiposity and serum CRP concentration [3,4,5,6]. This supports the concept that obesity contributes to a state of low-grade systemic inflammation by promoting the production of a wide variety of pro-inflammatory cytokines [7].

The positive associations between prepregnancy body mass index (pBMI) and the risks of gestational diabetes and preeclampsia are well known [8,9,10], and both morbidities have been associated with elevated maternal serum CRP levels [11,12,13]. Several studies have also reported direct associations between prepregnancy obesity and elevated gestational CRP levels, and have suggested that inflammation is likely to be a mediator between prepregnancy obesity and adverse pregnancy outcomes [14,15,16,17].

It seems clear that women with prepregnancy overweight/obesity are prone to excessive gestational weight gain (GWG) [18,19,20,21,22]; it is thus of interest to examine whether excessive GWG, after taking into account prepregnancy adiposity, is an independent risk factor driving maternal systemic inflammation. Previous studies addressing this question have produced conflicting findings [23,24,25].

The goal of this study was to examine the associations of pBMI and total GWG (tGWG) with maternal prepartum serum CRP concentration in a large cohort of Chinese women who had undergone apparently healthy pregnancies.

Methods

Study population and data collection

This study was conducted at Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Center, and was based on a cohort initially including 22,455 pregnant women who delivered singletons following spontaneous pregnancy between 2016 and 2020. Data on pBMI, tGWG, and maternal prepartum serum high-sensitivity CRP concentration (measured on the same day of delivery or on the day preceding delivery) were available in these women. Exclusion criteria included women with the following characteristics: 1) pre-existing diabetes mellitus, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, renal diseases, liver diseases, thyroid diseases, or chronic infectious diseases (e.g. hepatitis B) (n = 5226); 2) preeclampsia, gestational diabetes mellitus, or any acute or chronic infectious diseases ascertained during the course of the index pregnancy (n = 9386); 3) premature rupture of membranes and placental problems such as placenta previa (n = 8925) in the index pregnancy; 4) fetal/neonatal structural abnormalities (n = 1085); 5) non-term (< 37 or ≥ 42 gestational weeks) deliveries (n = 903); 6) neonate 5-min Apgar score < 7 (n = 22); and 7) abnormal neonate birth weight (< 2500 or > 4000 g, n = 1329). We further excluded women with serum CRP concentration measured after delivery (n = 426) and women with seemingly erroneous values on body weight before delivery (< 30 or > 150 kg, n = 68) and on total gestational weight gain (determined by the lower and upper 0.5 percentiles, i.e., ≤ 0 or ≥ 29 kg, n = 181). After these exclusions, a total of 5476 women remained for final analysis. The study participant flowchart was provided in the Supplementary file.

Maternal demographics and reproductive history information as well as self-reported prepregnancy weight were collected at the antenatal booking visit. All women underwent ultrasound examinations performed at 11 ─ 13 gestational weeks. The crown-rump length from this ultrasound was used to determine gestational age. Maternal weight before delivery was obtained from the admission assessment form on labor and delivery. Maternal non-fasting venous blood samples, which were usually drawn shortly after admission, were collected in serum separator tubes and then analyzed in our laboratory. Serum CRP concentration was quantified using turbidimetric inhibition immunoassay kit (Strong Biotechnologies, Beijing, China).

This study was approved by the Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Center ethics committee (2021-030A01). Because this was a retrospective, chart review study, the ethics committee determined that patient informed consent was not required.

Statistical analysis

Study participants' characteristics were described using mean and standard deviation for continuous variables and using frequency and percentage for categorical ones. The relationships of pBMI and tGWG with log-transformed maternal prepartum serum CRP concentration were analyzed using linear regression, with and without adjustment for other maternal and fetal characteristics. The linear models were extended with restricted cubic spline terms to identify possible non-linearity.

Maternal prepartum serum CRP concentration was then categorized into < 3 mg/L, 3 – 10 mg/L, and > 10 mg/L. This study defined the last two categories as low-grade inflammation (LGI) and clinically significant inflammation (CSI), consistent with other studies [6, 26,27,28,29]. Multivariable Poisson regression models were built to estimate the relative risks (RRs) of having LGI and CSI across pBMI and tGWG categories, which were defined using the WHO criteria (pBMI < 18.5, 18.5 – 24.9, and ≥ 25.0 kg/m2) and the approximate tertile cut-offs (tGWG < 12.0, 12.0—14.9, and ≥ 15.0 kg), respectively. The multivariable Poisson models adjusted for maternal age, parity, and gestational length. When applicable, pBMI and tGWG were mutually adjusted for. Test for trend was performed by substituting the actual CRP values with their median for each pBMI or tGWG category and then introducing the medians into the model as a continuous variable. Please note that women with prepartum CSI were excluded when modeling the risk of prepartum LGI.

For tGWG, we also adopted the GWG recommendation proposed by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) to categorize women into three groups, i.e., inadequate, optimal, and excessive GWG. According to the IOM recommendation, the normal tGWG is 12.5 – 18, 11.5 – 16, 7 – 11.5, and 5 – 9 kg for women with pBMI < 18.5, 18.5 – 24.9, 25 – 29.9, and ≥ 30 kg/m2, respectively [30]. Two additional Poisson regression models were built to examine whether nonoptimal tGWG is associated with different risks of LGI and CSI compared with optimal tGWG.

Two-sided P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The R software (version 4.0.2, R foundation, Vienna, Austria) was used to conduct the statistical analyses.

Results

Among 5476 women, 394 (7.2%) and 2,617 (47.8%) met the criteria for CSI and LGI. The median prepartum CRP concentration for the entire cohort was 3.3 mg/L. Table 1 shows the baseline characteristics of the cohort. Women with prepartum CSI were statistically significantly younger, more likely to be nulliparous and to have higher pBMI than women without. The highest tertile of tGWG (≥ 15 kg) was more frequent among women with than without CSI (43.9% vs. 39.7%).

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of study participants, overall and by maternal prepartum CSI status
Full size table

In both the unadjusted and adjusted linear regression analyses, pBMI and tGWG demonstrated statistically significant positive associations with maternal prepartum CRP concentration (Table 2). Restricted cubic spline analyses revealed no statistically significant non-linearity.

Table 2 Unadjusted and adjusted associations of pBMI and tGWG with log-transformed maternal prepartum serum CRP concentration (n = 5476)
Full size table

The associations of pBMI and tGWG with maternal prepartum CSI and LGI risks are presented in Table 3. Compared with low pBMI (< 18.5 kg/m2), normal pBMI (18.5 – 24.9 kg/m2) and overweight/obesity (≥ 25.0 kg/m2) were statistically significantly associated with an increased risk of maternal prepartum CSI, with an RR (95% confidence interval [CI]) of 1.35 (1.05─1.74) and 2.28 (1.53─3.39), respectively (Ptrend < 0.01), whereas tGWG tertiles showed no statistically significant associations. Overweight/obesity and normal BMI vs. low pBMI were also statistically significantly associated with an increased risk of maternal prepartum LGI [RR (95% CI): 1.19 (1.11─1.28), 1.59 (1.42─1.77); Ptrend < 0.01]. For tGWG tertiles, a statistically significant positive association was seen for the highest (≥ 15.0 kg) vs. the lowest tertile (< 12.0 kg) [RR (95% CI): 1.17 (1.09─1.25)]. No statistically significant interaction was detected between pBMI and tGWG (data not shown).

Table 3 Adjusted associations of pBMI and tGWG with maternal prepartum CSI and LGI (n = 5476)
Full size table

As shown in Table 4, both excessive and inadequate tGWG vs. normal tGWG demonstrated positive but statistically non-significant associations with maternal prepartum CSI [RR (95% CI): 1.10 (0.88─1.39); 1.18 (0.94─1.48)]. Compared with normal tGWG, inadequate tGWG was associated with a statistically significantly decreased risk of maternal prepartum LGI risk [OR (95% CI): 0.91 (0.85–0.98)], while excessive tGWG showed a statistically significant but positive association [OR (95% CI): 1.14 (1.07–1.21)].

Table 4 Adjusted association of tGWG categorized by the IOM recommendation with maternal prepartum CSI and LGI (n = 5476)
Full size table

Discussion

In this study of women who had undergone apparently healthy pregnancies, pBMI and tGWG were both positively associated with maternal prepartum serum CRP concentration. Furthermore, higher pBMI was statistically significantly associated with increased prepartum CSI and LGI risks. Excessive tGWG, as defined by the IOM recommendation, was independently and statistically significantly associated with an increased LGI risk.

The association between obesity and maternal CRP level has been observed in pregnant women [14,15,16,17]. Although normal pregnancy is known as a process involving inflammation [31], elevated inflammation is considered pathogenic in the development of preeclampsia, retarded fetal growth, and many other maternal and fetal complications [31,32,33]. In order to identify elevated CRP levels, reference CRP intervals throughout normal pregnancies need to be established. In an ad hoc, small-scale Swedish study, the reference interval (i.e. the distance from 2.5 to 97.5 percentile) for maternal prepartum CRP concentration was 0.38 ─ 24.75 mg/L [34]. In our cohort, the corresponding interval was 0.56 ─ 16.7 mg/L. In one previous study including only 81 American women with normal pregnancy, the median CRP levels at or beyond 36 gestational weeks was 9 mg/L for women not in labor and 13 mg/L for women in labor [35]. In contrast, the median prepartum CRP concentration in the present study was considerably lower (3.3 mg/L), possibly owing to the low percentage of women with prepregnancy overweight or obesity. Despite a mean BMI of 25 kg/m2, another study reported remarkably low CRP concentrations at 36–38 gestational weeks across all BMI categories among normal pregnancies (e.g., the mean CRP concentration was lower than 1.69 mg/L even for women with BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) [36], somewhat contradicting the current knowledge that pregnancy by nature is a low-grade inflammatory state.

Several studies investigating the longitudinal changes of maternal CRP concentration throughout pregnancy have reported either increasing or decreasing trends [34, 37]. It is interesting that in the study by Larsson et al.[34], a notable decrease in maternal CRP concentration was seen prepartum (0–14 days before delivery) after an overall increasing trend until the 34 ─ 38 gestational weeks. Although our study measured maternal CRP on one single occasion when the CRP concentration is supposed to be low, we ascertained 47.8% women with LGI, confirming the extensive involvement of inflammation throughout pregnancy [31]. This study also suggests that the proinflammatory effect of prepregnancy adiposity persists as pregnancy proceeds, providing a possible explanation to the high CRP concentration in the colostrum from obese mothers and the presence of CRP in breast milk as a result of elevated maternal postpartum CRP concentration [38, 39]. However, this study is inconsistent with the study by Friss CM et al., where they found that the evident association between adiposity and maternal CRP concentration diminished toward the end of pregnancy [36].

Evidence obtained from non-pregnant populations indicates a positive association between weight gain and systemic inflammation characterized by elevated CRP concentration [3, 4, 40, 41]. In this study, we observed a similar positive association between tGWG and maternal prepartum CRP concentration, consisting with one prior study, in which per 1-kg increment in GWG was associated with a 3% increase in maternal CRP concentration [25]. However, the association was null in the study by Friss CM et al.[36]. In another study, tGWG showed positive associations with adiponectin and leptin but not with CRP [23].

Although we reported a positive association of tGWG with maternal prepartum CRP concentration and an increased LGI risk for women with excessive GWG, we could not determine a clear causal relationship, given the findings from prospective investigations suggesting that higher baseline CRP levels might promote the future weight gain [3, 42,43,44]. In order to rule out this reverse causality, prepregnancy or early-pregnancy CRP concentration should also be taken into account.

Our study’s strengths include its relatively large sample size and careful selection of only pregnancies without significant medical comorbidities. However, a few limitations need to be acknowledged. First, this study lacked some important data. As we discussed above, baseline maternal CRP concentration was not available in this study; thus we were unable to confirm the causal relationship between tGWG and maternal prepartum CRP level. We were also unable to adjust for some lifestyle factors in our multivariable analyses due to lack of data. For example, information on cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption was not collected, although they are believed to be relatively uncommon among Chinese women. In addition, we did not collect any data on other confounding factors including socioeconomic status, diet, and physical activity. According to previous studies [45,46,47], these factors might affect serum CRP concentration in non-pregnant populations, but we could not rule out their potential confounding effects in this study. Secondly, we followed the protocols of several previous studies to define LGI and CSI [26, 48, 49], but there is no clear consensus. In addition, as those studies measured CRP concentration in non-pregnant populations, and therefore their protocols might not be suitable for this study due to the typically elevated serum CRP levels in pregnant women. Thirdly, pBMI based on self-reported prepregnancy body weight was subject to recall bias and how it biased our results was determined by the pattern of misreporting. Lastly, the present study was conducted in a considerably lean cohort, which would limit the generalization of our results to populations where overweight and obesity are much more prevalent.

Conclusions

This cohort study among Chinese women with uncomplicated pregnancies suggests that higher pBMI and excessive tGWG may increase the risk of maternal prepartum systemic inflammation, further highlighting the importance of weight management before and during pregnancy.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Gabay C, Kushner I. Acute-phase proteins and other systemic responses to inflammation. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(6):448–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Young B, Gleeson M, Cripps AW. C-reactive protein: a critical review. Pathology. 1991;23(2):118–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Barinas-Mitchell E, Cushman M, Meilahn EN, Tracy RP, Kuller LH. Serum levels of C-reactive protein are associated with obesity, weight gain, and hormone replacement therapy in healthy postmenopausal women. Am J Epidemiol. 2001;153(11):1094–101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fransson EI, Batty GD, Tabak AG, Brunner EJ, Kumari M, Shipley MJ, Singh-Manoux A, Kivimaki M. Association between change in body composition and change in inflammatory markers: an 11-year follow-up in the Whitehall II Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(12):5370–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Nguyen XM, Lane J, Smith BR, Nguyen NT. Changes in inflammatory biomarkers across weight classes in a representative US population: a link between obesity and inflammation. J gastrointest surg. 2009;13(7):1205–12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Visser M, Bouter LM, McQuillan GM, Wener MH, Harris TB. Elevated C-reactive protein levels in overweight and obese adults. JAMA. 1999;282(22):2131–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Berg AH, Scherer PE. Adipose tissue, inflammation, and cardiovascular disease. Circ Res. 2005;96(9):939–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Shin D, Song WO. Prepregnancy body mass index is an independent risk factor for gestational hypertension, gestational diabetes, preterm labor, and small- and large-for-gestational-age infants. J Matern fetal Neonatal Med. 2015;28(14):1679–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rosenberg TJ, Garbers S, Chavkin W, Chiasson MA. Prepregnancy weight and adverse perinatal outcomes in an ethnically diverse population. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102(5 Pt 1):1022–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schummers L, Hutcheon JA, Bodnar LM, Lieberman E, Himes KP. Risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes by prepregnancy body mass index: a population-based study to inform prepregnancy weight loss counseling. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(1):133–43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Qiu C, Sorensen TK, Luthy DA, Williams MA. A prospective study of maternal serum C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2004;18(5):377–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wolf M, Sandler L, Hsu K, Vossen-Smirnakis K, Ecker JL, Thadhani R. First-trimester C-reactive protein and subsequent gestational diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(3):819–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rebelo F, Schlussel MM, Vaz JS, Franco-Sena AB, Pinto TJ, Bastos FI, Adegboye AR, Kac G. C-reactive protein and later preeclampsia: systematic review and meta-analysis taking into account the weight status. J Hypertens. 2013;31(1):16–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shin D, Hur J, Cho EH, Chung HK, Shivappa N, Wirth MD, Hebert JR, Lee KW. Pre-Pregnancy Body Mass Index Is Associated with Dietary Inflammatory Index and C-Reactive Protein Concentrations during Pregnancy. Nutrients. 2017;9(4):351.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Retnakaran R, Hanley AJ, Raif N, Connelly PW, Sermer M, Zinman B. C-reactive protein and gestational diabetes: the central role of maternal obesity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88(8):3507–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bodnar LM, Ness RB, Harger GF, Roberts JM. Inflammation and triglycerides partially mediate the effect of prepregnancy body mass index on the risk of preeclampsia. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;162(12):1198–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Witteveen AB, Henrichs J, Bellers M, van Oenen E, Verhoeven CJ, Vrijkotte TGM: Mediating role of C-reactive protein in associations between pre-pregnancy BMI and adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes: the ABCD-study cohort. The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstet. 2022;35(15):2867–75.

  18. Krukowski RA, Bursac Z, McGehee MA, West D. Exploring potential health disparities in excessive gestational weight gain. J Womens Health. 2013;22(6):494–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Restall A, Taylor RS, Thompson JM, Flower D, Dekker GA, Kenny LC, Poston L, McCowan LM. Risk factors for excessive gestational weight gain in a healthy, nulliparous cohort. J obes. 2014;2014:148391.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Garay SM, Sumption LA, Pearson RM, John RM. Risk factors for excessive gestational weight gain in a UK population: a biopsychosocial model approach. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Heery E, Kelleher CC, Wall PG, McAuliffe FM. Prediction of gestational weight gain - a biopsychosocial model. Public Health Nutr. 2015;18(8):1488–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kowal C, Kuk J, Tamim H. Characteristics of weight gain in pregnancy among Canadian women. Matern Child Health J. 2012;16(3):668–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Logan CA, Bornemann R, Koenig W, Reister F, Walter V, Fantuzzi G, Weyermann M, Brenner H, Genuneit J, Rothenbacher D. Gestational weight gain and fetal-maternal adiponectin, leptin, and CRP: results of two birth cohorts studies. Sci Rep. 2017;7:41847.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Perng W, Rifas-Shiman SL, Rich-Edwards JW, Stuebe AM, Oken E. Inflammation and weight gain in reproductive-aged women. Ann Hum Biol. 2016;43(1):91–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hrolfsdottir L, Schalkwijk CG, Birgisdottir BE, Gunnarsdottir I, Maslova E, Granstrom C, Strom M, Olsen SF, Halldorsson TI. Maternal diet, gestational weight gain, and inflammatory markers during pregnancy. Obesity. 2016;24(10):2133–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Dhingra R, Gona P, Nam BH, D’Agostino RB Sr, Wilson PW, Benjamin EJ, O’Donnell CJ. C-reactive protein, inflammatory conditions, and cardiovascular disease risk. Am J Med. 2007;120(12):1054–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Dinh KM, Kaspersen KA, Mikkelsen S, Pedersen OB, Petersen MS, Thorner LW, Hjalgrim H, Rostgaard K, Ullum H, Erikstrup C. Low-grade inflammation is negatively associated with physical health-related quality of Life in healthy individuals: results from the danish blood donor study (DBDS). PLoS ONE. 2019;14(3):e0214468.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Rifai N, Ridker PM. Population distributions of C-reactive protein in apparently healthy men and women in the United States: implication for clinical interpretation. Clin Chem. 2003;49(4):666–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Imhof A, Frohlich M, Loewel H, Helbecque N, Woodward M, Amouyel P, Lowe GD, Koenig W. Distributions of C-reactive protein measured by high-sensitivity assays in apparently healthy men and women from different populations in Europe. Clin Chem. 2003;49(4):669–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Weight Gain During Pregnancy: Reexamining the Guidelines. Institute of Medicine (US) and National Research Council (US) Committee to Reexamine IOM Pregnancy Weight Guidelines. Kathleen M Rasmussen, Ann L Yaktine<br>, editors. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2009. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20669500/.

  31. Romero R, Gotsch F, Pineles B, Kusanovic JP. Inflammation in pregnancy: its roles in reproductive physiology, obstetrical complications, and fetal injury. Nutr Rev. 2007;65(12 Pt 2):S194-202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Palm M, Axelsson O, Wernroth L, Larsson A, Basu S. Involvement of inflammation in normal pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013;92(5):601–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Cotechini T, Graham CH. Aberrant maternal inflammation as a cause of pregnancy complications: A potential therapeutic target? Placenta. 2015;36(8):960–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Larsson A, Palm M, Hansson LO, Basu S, Axelsson O. Reference values for alpha1-acid glycoprotein, alpha1-antitrypsin, albumin, haptoglobin, C-reactive protein, IgA, IgG and IgM during pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87(10):1084–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Watts DH, Krohn MA, Wener MH, Eschenbach DA. C-reactive protein in normal pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;77(2):176–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Friis CM, Paasche Roland MC, Godang K, Ueland T, Tanbo T, Bollerslev J, Henriksen T. Adiposity-related inflammation: effects of pregnancy. Obesity. 2013;21(1):E124-130.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Christian LM, Porter K. Longitudinal changes in serum proinflammatory markers across pregnancy and postpartum: effects of maternal body mass index. Cytokine. 2014;70(2):134–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Fujimori M, Franca EL, Morais TC, Fiorin V, de Abreu LC, Honorio-Franca AC. Cytokine and adipokine are biofactors can act in blood and colostrum of obese mothers. BioFactors. 2017;43(2):243–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Whitaker KM, Marino RC, Haapala JL, Foster L, Smith KD, Teague AM, Jacobs DR, Fontaine PL, McGovern PM, Schoenfuss TC, et al. Associations of Maternal Weight Status Before, During, and After Pregnancy with Inflammatory Markers in Breast Milk. Obesity. 2017;25(12):2092–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Saito I, Yonemasu K, Inami F. Association of body mass index, body fat, and weight gain with inflammation markers among rural residents in Japan. Circ J. 2003;67(4):323–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Thompson AL, Koehler E, Herring AH, Paynter L, Du S, Zhang B, Popkin B, Gordon-Larsen P. Weight Gain Trajectories Associated With Elevated C-Reactive Protein Levels in Chinese Adults. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5(9):e003262.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Barzilay JI, Forsberg C, Heckbert SR, Cushman M, Newman AB. The association of markers of inflammation with weight change in older adults: the Cardiovascular Health Study. Int J Obes. 2006;30(9):1362–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Engstrom G, Hedblad B, Stavenow L, Lind P, Janzon L, Lindgarde F. Inflammation-sensitive plasma proteins are associated with future weight gain. Diabetes. 2003;52(8):2097–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Holz T, Thorand B, Doring A, Schneider A, Meisinger C, Koenig W. Markers of inflammation and weight change in middle-aged adults: results from the prospective MONICA/KORA S3/F3 study. Obesity. 2010;18(12):2347–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Nazmi A, Victora CG. Socioeconomic and racial/ethnic differentials of C-reactive protein levels: a systematic review of population-based studies. BMC Public Health. 2007;7:212.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Hart MJ, Torres SJ, McNaughton SA, Milte CM. A Dietary Inflammatory Index and associations with C-reactive protein in a general adult population. Eur J Nutr. 2021;60(7):4093–106.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Kasapis C, Thompson PD. The effects of physical activity on serum C-reactive protein and inflammatory markers: a systematic review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45(10):1563–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Woloshin S, Schwartz LM. Distribution of C-reactive protein values in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(15):1611–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Kushner I, Samols D, Magrey M. A unifying biologic explanation for “high-sensitivity” C-reactive protein and “low-grade” inflammation. Arthritis Care Res. 2010;62(4):442–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Mrs. Juan Li for her administrative support.

Funding

This study was financially supported by a joint project between Guangzhou Metropolitan Science Bureau and Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center (grant reference number: 202102010245). The funder of this study had no role in study design, data analysis, and result interpretation and reporting.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Clinical Epidemiology Group, Department of Clinical Research, Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, 9 Jinsui Road, Guangzhou, 510623, China

    Kuanrong Li, Chuanzi Yang & Xiaojun Li

  2. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, 9 Jinsui Road, Guangzhou, 510623, China

    Jiaying Fan, Chongjuan Gu & Huishu Liu

Authors
  1. Kuanrong Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chuanzi Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jiaying Fan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xiaojun Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Chongjuan Gu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Huishu Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

KL and HL designed the study. KL performed the statistical analyses and drafted the manuscript. CY and XL contributed to data collection. HL, JF and CG helped with the result interpretation. All authors critically reviewed the manuscript and gave their final approval for this submission.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Kuanrong Li or Huishu Liu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was a part of a research project investigating gestational diabetes diagnosis and risk factors based on retrospective analysis of clinical data from electronic health records. The Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Center ethics committee approved the study protocol on February 25, 2021 (ref. no. 2021-030A01), in which we requested to waive the collection of patient informed consents. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

12884_2022_4849_MOESM1_ESM.pdf

Additional file 1.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, K., Yang, C., Fan, J. et al. Prepregnancy body mass index, gestational weight gain, and maternal prepartum inflammation in normal pregnancies: findings from a Chinese cohort. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 22, 531 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04849-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04849-y

Keywords

  • Prepregnancy body mass index
  • Gestational weight gain
  • C-reactive protein
  • Systemic inflammation
  • Cohort study

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

ISSN: 1471-2393

Contact us