Skip to main content

Prevalence and associated factors of caesarian section in Ethiopia: a multilevel analysis of the 2019 Ethiopia Mini Demographic Health Survey



Caesarian section is a vital emergency obstetric intervention for saving the lives of mothers and newborns. However, factors which are responsible for caesarian section (CS) were not well established in the country level data. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the prevalence and associated factors of caesarian section in Ethiopia.


Data from the Ethiopian Mini Demographic and Health survey 2019 were used to identify factors associated with the caesarian section in Ethiopia. We applied multi-level logistic regression and a p-value of <0.25 to include variables before modeling and a p-value<0.05 with 95% confidence interval (CI) for final results.


The prevalence of caesarian section in Ethiopia was 5.44% (95% CI; 0.048-0.06) in2019. Women in age group of 30-39 and 40-49 years had a higher odd of caesarian section (AOR = 2.14, 95%CI = 1.55-2.94) and (AOR = 2, 95%CI = 1.20-3.97) respectively compared to women in age group of 15-29 years. Women with secondary and higher educational level had higher odds of caesarian section (AOR = 2.15, 95%CI = 1.38-3.34) and (AOR = 2.8, 95%CI = 1.73-4.53) compared to those in no education category. Compared to Orthodox, Muslims and Protestant religions had lower odds of caesarian section with AOR of 0.50 (0.34-0.73) and 0.53 (0.34-0.85). Having <2 births was also associated with the low caesarian section 0.61(0.52-1.22). Using modern contraceptive methods, having ANC visits of 1-3, 4th, 5 plus, and urban residence were associated with higher odds of caesarian section as 1.4 (1.05-1.80]), 2.2 (1.51-3.12), 1.7 (1.12-2.46), and 2.4 (1.65-3.44) 1.6(1.04-2.57) respectively.


Although evidence indicates that the caesarian deliveries increased both in developed and underdeveloped countries, the current magnitude of this service was very low in Ethiopia which might indicate missing opportunities that might costing lives of mothers and newborns. Women’s age, religion, educational status, parity, contraceptive method, and ANC visit were individual level factors influenced caesarian section. whereas, region and place of residence were community level factors affected caesarian section in the country. Depending on these factors, the country needs policy decisions for further national level interventions.

Peer Review reports


Caesarian section (CS) is the delivery of the pregnancy outcome by incision through the maternal abdomen and uterus which was named after the belief that Julius Caesar was born through CS. It has been recommended for the mothers whose labor progress is poor due to the either maternal or fetal factors [1]. Report on the CS rate from 1990 to 2018 for countries all over the world indicated that rate of CS continues to rise in high, middle, and low-income countries [2]. Evidence from Saudi and India also indicated that there was a rise in the CS deliveries due to various reasons [3, 4]. In Sub-Saharan African countries, there was no consistent increase throughout the region; however, there CS was still rising [5]. In Ethiopia, the small size studies indicates there was also a rise in performing CS in the country [6, 7].

According to the World Health Organization (WHO) caesarian section statement, the optimal proportion of caesarian section was considered to range between 10-15%. Since 1985, caesarian section has increased in both developing and developed countries. The maternal and newborn deaths were significantly decreased until the proportion become 10% [8]; however, evidence indicated that the rate above 10% was not linked to any further improvement in the population based assessments [9]. Caesarian section should be only performed when medically necessary for the patient care as it also poses some complication like disability and death. Both under and over performed caesarian section have adverse outcomes on the health of the mothers and newborns [10]. Countries need to control the over performance of caesarian section but also make sure that life is not losing while these services are available. Under performance costs unnecessary lives of mothers and newborns, while over performance exposes mothers and newborns to extra unwanted complications [8, 10, 11]. To ensure cautious use of this service, prevalence and reason of indication (factors) might be vital gates in developing countries to regulate the event.

Overall, the caesarian section in Ethiopia were 21% in Butajira General hospital in 2019 [12]; 29.7% in Jugal hospital in 2019 [6]; 47.6% in Dessie town hospitals [4]; 34.3% in hospitals in Harar [13]; 30.9% public hospitals in Northern Ethiopia [14]; 24.7% in Durame general hospital [15]; 28.1% in three hospitals of Southwest Ethiopia [16]; 27.6% in Atta hospital [17, 18]; 38.5% in a national cross-sectional study [19]; 3.5% in another community-based cross-sectional study [20]; 51.9% in South Gondar [21]. The rate of the caesarian section was 18% in 2011. It was higher in private and profit institutions, while maternal indication was also higher than all other indications in both private and public hospitals [22]. A study conducted in the Western Wellega (Ethiopia) showed that the prevalence of the cesarean section was 33.1%, where maternal age, gestational age, and fetal weight essentially prejudiced magnitude [7]. Some evidence showed that the caesarian section has been carried out in favor of women economic status [23]. For instance, Addis Ababa (the capital) had the highest caesarian section proportion [24]

There are variety of factors associated with CS in the country. Women's education, wealth index, parity, delivery were all responsible for higher caesarian section [25]. The prevalence of caesarian section in Bahirdar, Northern Ethiopia was 41.8%, and factors like delivery in private health facilities, breech presentation, urban residence, being referred, being government employees, and parity associated with the increased magnitude [26]. The caesarian section was also performed more among obese women as revealed by one study [27]. In Addis Ababa, the prevalence of caesarian section was 38.3%, while having some risk factors like delivering in private health facility and maternal education were associated in the rural areas [28].

The proportion was also very high (49.3%) in Hawassa city (the capital of Southern Ethiopia), where monthly income above poverty, and previous pregnancy complications were positively associated unlike the use of partograph which lowered the proportion [29]. In another study, singleton pregnancy, birth weight less than 2500gm, completely documented partograph, and pregnancy-induced hypertension were found to be the determinants of caesarian section [30].

The meta-analysis of studies done in the country presented the pooled prevalence of 29.55% Caesarean sections with the cephalopelvic disproportion and non-reassuring fetal heart rate pattern were associate [31]. Institutional deliveries were accompanied by a caesarian section (24.8 %.) in other study [32].

Although factors associated with the caesarian section look identified, most studies in the process were used traditional single level analyses which were at risk of higher bias compared to the multilevel analyses. Most studies were also followed analysis of the pocket places or residences and had no regional comparison which made them very limited in that context and also put factors associated with caesarian section in cloud.

Using the country representative sample have the paramount advantages over other small area studies in determining the compiled magnitude to display national level factors and might led to the further policy decisions for national level interventions. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the prevalence and associated factors of caesarian section in Ethiopia.


Study design, setting, and period

A cross-sectional study was conducted using Ethiopia Mini Demographic Health Survey (EMDHS) 2019. Ethiopia is the second most populous country in African continent situated at (3o-14oN, 33o – 48°E). EMDHS is the country representative sample survey carried out between EDHS. The country has nine regions and two city administrations which further categorized in to contextual groups as agrarian (Amhara, Benishangul-Gumuz, Gambela, Harari, Oromia, Southern Nations, Nationalities, and People Region (SNNPR), and Tigray), pastoralists (Afar and Somali), and city administrations (Addis Ababa and Dire-Dawa). We downloaded a secondary data from DHS website ( The detailed sampling procedure has been presented in the full EMDHS 2019 report [33].

Study variables

The outcome variable was caesarean section delivery. It was retrieved from dichotomized DHS question asking for ‘delivery by caesarian section’. The responses were classified originally and here as No (0) or yes (1).

Independent variables

Independent predictors were classified individual and community-level factors. Individual level factors were a religion, contraception, age, maternal education, household wealth index, place of delivery, parity, birth order, preceding birth interval, number of ANC visit and sex of the child. Community level factors were region and residence. The detailed information about explanatory factors were presented in Table 1.

Table 1 The summary of some of the independent variables

Data management and Statistical analysis

Before conducting the descriptive data analysis, we weighted the data to adjust for the non-proportional allocation of samples to strata and regions. Then, descriptive statistics were performed and presented using weighted frequencies, mean ± (standard deviations), and percentage, while all analyses were performed using STATA version 15 (STATA Corporation. IC., TX, USA).

All the fixed effect factors were introduced in to model after bivariate test at p-value of <0.25; all random effect variables were also tested similarly. In the final model, the association of the predictors with caesarian section was checked by considering p-value of <0.05 and the results were presented using AOR with 95% CI.

To identify community effect, Intra-cluster Correlation (ICC) was valued by the community level variance. Then the Likelihood Ratio (LR) test, Median Odds Ratio (MOR), and Proportional Change in Variance (PCV) were examined for the fitness of the model as follow.

ICC= \(\frac{{\upsigma^2}_a}{{\upsigma^2}_a+{\upsigma^2}_b}\); where, σ2a (random effect) is the community level variance and σ2b (fixed effect) indicates individual level variance and ( σ2b ) equal to π2/3.

Median Odds Ratio (MOR) was estimated as MOR= e 0.95* \(\sqrt{V{a}_{\_1}}\), where, Va_1 is community variance, MOR used to measure an unexplained cluster heterogeneity. Proportional Change in Variance (PCV) was estimated as PVC = \(\frac{Va\_1- Va\_2}{Va\_1}\) , PCV measures the total variation attributed by individual-level factors and community-level factors.

Since four consecutive models were built to fit the data, the model comparison was done using the Likelihood Ratio (LR) test, while goodness of fit was assessed using deviance (-2LL).


Sociodemographic characteristics of study participant

A total of 5527 study participant were involved in this study. Out of this 300 (5.44%) were underwent caesarian section in the country in 2019. Among the eligible women for caesarian section 38 % were Muslim religion follower. More than half of the study participants were in age group of 15-29 (55.2 %) and had no education (53.58%). Majority of the women were from Oromia (40%), followed by SNNP (20%). Majority of the participants (95.77%)) were married and 45.56% of the women were poor (Table 2).

Table 2 Socio- demographic characteristics of study participant (Weighted, N=5,527)

Associated factors of caesarian section

The random effect analysis result

The ICC in the null model indicated that 41% of the total variability in caesarian section was attributed due to the differences between clusters while the remaining unexplained 59% of the total variability of caesarian section was attributed to the individual differences. Also, the MOR was 3.9 in null model which indicate that there was a variation in caesarian section between clusters. If we randomly select two women from different clusters, if we transfer women from low caesarian section clusters to higher caesarian section clusters, she might have 3.9 times higher odds of having caesarian section. This showed that the existence of significant heterogeneity in caesarian section delivery. The proportional change in variance (PCV) in this model was 77% which showed that 77% of community variance observed in the null model was explained by both community and individual level variables. The best fitted model was compared by deviance and the best fitted was model III, with the lowest deviance (Table 3).

Table 3 Random effect analysis result

The fixed effect analysis result

In the multilevel logistic regression analysis, women age, religion, educational status, parity, contraceptive method, ANC visit, region and place of residence were significantly associated with caesarian section delivery. The odds of CS among women in age group 30-39 and 40-49 years were 2.14 (AOR = 2.14, 95%CI = 1.55-2.94) and 2.20(AOR = 2.20, 95%CI = 1.20-3.97) times higher than that of the women in age group of 15-29 respectively. The odds of having CS among Muslim women (AOR = 0.50, 95%CI = 0.34-0.73) and Protestant (AOR = 0.53, 95%CI = 0.34-0.85) religion followers were decreased by 50% and 47 % compared to the Orthodox religion followers respectively. The odds of CS among women who educated secondary and higher level were 2.15 (AOR = 2.15, 95%CI = 1.38-3.34) and 2.8 (AOR = 2.8, 95%CI = 1.73-4.53) times higher than that of women with no education.

The odds of CS among mothers with 3-5 parity (AOR = 0.61, 95%CI = 0.44- 0.94) was decreased by 39% than that of mothers with 1-2 parity.

Women who use modern contraceptive methods had higher odds of CS (AOR = 1.4, 95%CI = 1.05-1.80) than women who had no contraceptive use experience. Women who used antenatal care of 1-3 visit, four visits, and five and above visits had higher odds of CS with AOR of (AOR = 2.2, 95% CI = 1.51-3.12), (AOR = 1.7, 95% CI = 1.12-2.46) (AOR = 2.4, 95% CI = 1.65-3.44) than those who do not have ANC respectively.

The odds of the CS for the women residing in Addis Ababa (AOR = 3.4, 95% CI = 1.46-7.22), Amhara (AOR = 2.2, 95% CI = 1.07-4.45), Dire Dawa (AOR = 4.9, 95% CI = 2.26-10.56), Harari (AOR = 2.9, 95% CI = 1.55-2.94), and SNNP (AOR = 2.8, 95%CI = 1.26-6.00) were higher than that of the women residing in Tigray. The odds of having CS among women of the urban resident was 1.6 (AOR = 1.6, 95% CI = 0.41, 0.45) relative to the rural resident (Table 4).

Table 4 Factors associated with caesarian in Ethiopia, EMDHS 2019


The objective of this study was to assess the prevalence and associated factors of caesarian section in Ethiopia using the recent Ethiopian Mini Demographic and Health survey data set. The prevalence of caesarian section was 5.44% in the country in 2019. This finding is lower than that of studies conducted in Ghana 7% [34], Cameroon [35], Bangladesh [36], and lower recommended range of WHO which is 10-15%. It has been suggested that increasing CS up to 10% significantly reduces maternal and newborn deaths, but no change as proportion exceeds 10% [37].. From our finding (5.44%), it can be said that women in Ethiopia have either lower access or poorly afforded the service. It might mean a lot as life mothers and newborns might be losing because of the below required service magnitude. Inequality in accessing healthcare services might need to be the major agenda once again [7, 38].

This study revealed that as age of the women increase the likelihood of having caesarian section increased. This finding is supported by study done in Asia population [39], Bangladesh [40], Benin [41], and other countries [42]. This could be due to the fact that as women stay more in reproductive services, they might have good and experience of accessing CS and might also indicate that fetal growth impairment, pregnancy induced hypertension and maternal complications, and other obstetric and reproductive health problems increases with increased age [5, 22]. Having CS among Muslim and protestant women was less likely than that of orthodox women. This finding is in line with study in Nigeria [43]. This might indicate that service like CS might follow religious paths. .

Caesarian delivery was higher among women attended secondary and higher education than not educated women. This finding is supported with the similar studies in Ethiopian [20], Ghana [34], Benin [41]. The consistent information might indicate that educational status of the women remained the major factor in helping the women to make better self-reliant decisions.

Women who have three to five successful births were less likely to have caesarian section compared to the women who have one to two successful births. This is supported by some studies in the country [20, 44]. The possible explanation might be associated with the less experience of complications that lead to CS among women who gave spontaneous successful births previously. The odds of having CS among the women who use the modern contraceptive methods was higher compared to women of no contraceptive use [45]. This might be showing that mothers who used the modern contraceptive methods were the only mothers who have the knowledge, access, and can afford services. It might also be due to the fact that mothers who use modern contraception have long experience with healthcare services where they have been frequently for the specified service and that might made them a bit more knowledgeable than those who are not using. This might implied that increasing modern contraceptive utilization might trigger co-utilization of other services like CS [46, 47].

This study evidenced that those mothers who had ANC follow up were more likely to have cesarean section compared to mothers who have no- ANC visits. This finding is supported by the study done in Ghana [34]. It might be due to the exposure of ANC utilizing and exposure of mother to healthcare worker during ANC visits that helped them identify more risk of pregnancy complication [48, 49].

Women residing in Addis Ababa, Amhara, Dire Dawa, Harari and SNNP had higher odds of undergoing caesarian section compared to those residing in Tigray. This finding is supported by the previous study in Ethiopia [50]. This evidenced that the city administrators and agrarian regions have a good access to health facility services. This puts forth that there might be an inequality in accessing healthcare in some parts of the country. The women in urban area had higher odds of undergoing CS. This finding is supported by a study done in Nigeria [43]. the consistent information might be due to the urban women had access to skilled care providers, specialized hospitals, and obstetric services. In other words, this might be indicating that there was an inequality in accessing health services in the country. Although this study has vital information for the scientific community, it has also some limitations. The disproportionate sampling techniques and secondary source nature of the data were some of the limitations. We weighted the data and also collected all necessary documents to verify the appropriateness of the data before the analyses. Variables like respondent’s employment status, decision making, distance to health facility, and some other variables were not collected in the EMDHS 2019. In other words, we controlled for the effect of BMI to focus on access, availability, awareness, and affordability measuring factors. Thus, the result should be used in light of these limitations.

Strength of the study

This study has a number of strengths. First, the study used recent data from a nationally representative demographic and health survey in Ethiopia, which allowed us to generalize the results to the rest of the country. We followed multilevel analysis to reduce intercommunity influences and data passed through various tests.


Caesarian delivery in Ethiopia was not met the range of WHO recommendation. Women age, religion, educational status, parity, contraceptive method, ANC visit and community level factors region and place of residence were major determinants of caesarian delivery in Ethiopia. Empowering women, educating women, increasing co-services like modern contraceptive and ANC utilization and targeting mothers’ awareness might be very vital to deal with current problem. The prevalence of CS had regional variation the regional which also support the importance of region-specific further intervention.

Availability of data and materials

The data in which the authors used to produce this manuscript are available upon reasonable request from the correspondence author



Adjusted Odds Ratio


Confidence Interval


Caesarian Section


Ethiopia Mini Demographic and Health Survey


Intra Class Correlation Coefficient


Log-Likelihood Ratio


Median odds ratio


Odds Ratio


Proportional Change in Variance


Southern Nations, Nationalities, and Peoples’ Region


  1. 1.

    American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2015). FAQ: Cesarean birth (C-section). Retrieved February 17, 2017, from

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Betran AP, Ye J, Moller B, Souza JP. Trends and projections of caesarean section rates : global and regional estimates; 2021. p. 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Alabdullah HA, Ismael L, Alshehri LA, et al. The Prevalence of C-Section Delivery and Its Associated Factors Among Saudi Women Attending Different Clinics of King Khalid University Hospital. Cureus. 2021;13(1):e12774.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Giletew A, Id W, Zeleke AA, Yenus H. Cesarean delivery among women who gave birth in Dessie town hospitals. Northeast. 2019;198:1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Yaya S, Uthman OA, Amouzou A, Bishwajit G. Disparities in caesarean section prevalence and determinants across sub-Saharan Africa countries; 2018. p. 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Hussen A. Prevalence and indication and outcome of cesarean section in jugal hospital, harari regional state, Ethiopia, 2019: Aretrospective study. Publ health Indones. 2019;5(4):85–90.

  7. 7.

    Duressa K, Fekadu G, Taye B, Asfaw H. Cesarean Section and Associated Factors at Aira Hospital, Oromia Region, Western Ethiopia: A Retrospective Record Review. Int J Biomed Eng Clin Sci. 2020;6(1):1–6.

  8. 8.

    WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates. 2014;

  9. 9.

    WHO. Sexual and reproductive health; 2016. p. 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstetris Care Consensus - Safe prevention of the Primary Cesarean Delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;2(12):7.

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Caughey AB, Cahill AG, Guise JM, Rouse DJ. Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2014;69(7):381–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Medicine AOF. iMedPub Journals Prevalence and Outcome of Caesarean Section in Attat Hospital, Gurage Zone, SNNPR, Ethiopia Abstract. 2015;7(4):4–9.

  13. 13.

    Tsega F, Mengistie B, Dessie Y, Mengesha MM. Prevalence of cesarean section in urban health facilities and associated factors in eastern ethiopia: hospital based cross sectional study. J Preg Child Health. 2015;2:169.

  14. 14.

    Ayalew M, Mengistie B, Dheressa M, Demis A. Magnitude of Cesarean Section Delivery and Its Associated Factors Among Mothers Who Gave Birth at Public Hospitals in Northern Ethiopia : Institution-Based Cross-Sectional Study; 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Halil HM, Abdo RA, Hellil SE, Kedir RD. Predictors of Cesarean Section among Women Delivered at Durame General Hospital, Southern Ethiopia. J Women's Health Care. 2020;9:482.

  16. 16.

    Ejigu AG, Lambyo SH. Predicting factors of failed induction of labor in three hospitals of Southwest Ethiopia : a cross-sectional study; 2021. p. 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Moges A, Ademe BW, Akessa GM. Archives of Medicine; 2021. p. 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Item V, Moges A, Wondafrash B, Muleta G. Prevalence and outcome of ceasarean-section in attat hospital gurage zone , snnpr , Ethiopia Prevalence and outcome of ceasarean-section in attat hospital gurage zone, snnpr, Ethiopia Browse All of IR; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Geleto A, Chojenta C, Taddele T, et al. Association between maternal mortality and caesarean section in Ethiopia: a national cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20:588.

  20. 20.

    Azene AG, Aragaw AM, Birlie MG. Multilevel modelling of factors associated with caesarean section in Ethiopia : community based cross sectional study. BMC Res Notes. 2019;12:1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Getnet B, Degu A, Yenealem F. Prevalence and associated factors of early initiation of breastfeeding among women delivered via Cesarean section in South Gondar zone hospitals Ethiopia, 2020. Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol. 2020;6:6.

  22. 22.

    Fesseha N, Getachew A, Hiluf M, Gebrehiwot Y, Bailey P. A national review of cesarean delivery in Ethiopia. 2011;115(1):5–7.

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Shibre G, Idriss-Wheeler D, Bishwajit G, Yaya S. Observed trends in the magnitude of socioeconomic and area-based inequalities in use of caesarean section in Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Yisma E, Smithers LG, Lynch JW, Mol BW. Cesarean section in Ethiopia: prevalence and sociodemographic characteristics. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;32(7):1130–5. Epub 2017 Nov 20.

  25. 25.

    Gebremedhin S. Trend and socio-demographic differentials of Caesarean section rate in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: analysis based on Ethiopia demographic and health surveys data. Reprod Health. 2014;11(1):1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Melesse MB, Geremew AB, Abebe SM. High prevalence of caesarean birth among mothers delivered at health facilities in Bahir Dar city, Amhara region, Ethiopia. A comparative study. PLOS ONE. 2020;15(4):e0231631.

  27. 27.

    Endalifer ML, Diress G, Almaw H. Effect of overweight / obesity on caesarean section occurrence among aged women in Ethiopia : a secondary data analysis; 2021. p. 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Tsegaye H, Desalegne B, Wassihun B, Bante A, Fikadu K, Debalkie M, et al. Prevalence and associated factors of caesarean section in Addis Ababa hospitals, Ethiopia. Pan Afr Med J. 2019;34:136. PMID: 33708305.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Tenaw Z, Kassa ZY, Kassahun G, Ayenew A. Maternal Preference, Mode of Delivery and Associated Factors among Women Who Gave Birth at Public and Private Hospitals in Hawassa City, Southern Ethiopia. Ann Glob Health. 2019;85(1):115.

  30. 30.

    Hailu AG, Fanta TK, Welay FT, Assefa NE, Hadera SA, Gebremeskel GA, et al. Determinants of Cesarean Section Deliveries in Public Hospitals of Addis Ababa , Ethiopia, 2018 / 19: A Case-Control Study, vol. 2020; 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Gedefaw G, Demis A, Alemnew B, Wondmieneh A, Getie A, Waltengus F. Prevalence, indications, and outcomes of caesarean section deliveries in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Patient Saf Surg [Internet]. 2020;14(1):11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Ayano B, Guto A. Indications and Outcomes of Emergency Caesarean Section at St Paul’s Hospital Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 2017: (Afoul Month Retrospective Cohort Study). Gynecol Reprod Health. 2018;2(5):1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Ethiopian Public Health Institute (EPHI) [Ethiopia] and ICF. 2021. Ethiopia Mini Demographic and Health Survey 2019. J Chem Inf Model. 2013;53:1689–99.

  34. 34.

    Manyeh AK, Amu A, Akpakli DE, Williams J, Gyapong M. Socioeconomic and demographic factors associated with caesarean section delivery in Southern Ghana: evidence from INDEPTH Network member site. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth [Internet]. 2018;18(1):405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Njim T, Tanyitiku BS, Mbanga C. Prevalence, indications and neonatal complications of caesarean deliveries in Cameroon: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Public Heal [Internet]. 2020;78(1):51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Karim F, Ali NB, Khan ANS, Hassan A, Hasan MM, Hoque DME, et al. Prevalence and factors associated with caesarean section in four Hard-to-Reach areas of Bangladesh: Findings from a cross-sectional survey. PLoS One [Internet]. 2020;15(6):e0234249.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Appropriate technology following birth. Lancet (London, England). 1986;2(8520):1387–8.

  38. 38.

    Karim F, Ali NB, Khan ANS, Hassan A, Hasan MM, Hoque DME, et al. Prevalence and factors associated with caesarean section in four Hard-to-Reach areas of Bangladesh: Findings from a cross-sectional survey. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(6):e0234249.

  39. 39.

    Hsieh T-T, Liou J-D, Hsu J-J, Lo L-M, Chen S-F, Hung T-H. Advanced maternal age and adverse perinatal outcomes in an Asian population. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol [Internet]. 2010;148(1):21–6 Available from:

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Begum T, Rahman A, Nababan H, Hoque DME, Khan AF, Ali T, et al. Indications and determinants of caesarean section delivery: Evidence from a population-based study in Matlab, Bangladesh. PLoS One. 2017;12(11):e0188074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Klikpo E, Azandjeme C, Kpozehouen A, Gle Y, Metonnou C, Mongbo V. Eur J Pub Health. 2019;29(Supplement 4):434–5.

    Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Janoudi G, Kelly S, Yasseen A, Hamam H, Moretti F, Walker M. Factors Associated With Increased Rates of Caesarean Section in Women of Advanced Maternal Age. J Obstet Gynaecol Canada [Internet]. 2015;37(6):517–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Adewuyi EO, Auta A, Khanal V, Tapshak SJ, Zhao Y. Cesarean delivery in Nigeria: prevalence and associated factors—a population-based cross-sectional study. BMJ Open [Internet]. 2019;9(6):e027273 Available from:

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Akki JS, Gemeda DH, Akessa GM. A review of caesarean delivery in Southwest Ethiopia: incidence, indications and outcomes. Afr J Midwifery Womens Health. 2015;9(3):106–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Heller R, Johnstone A, Cameron ST. Routine provision of intrauterine contraception at elective cesarean section in a national public health service: a service evaluation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017;96(9):1144–51. Epub 2017 Jul 7.

  46. 46.

    Endriyas M, Eshete A, Mekonnen E, Misganaw T, Shiferaw M, Ayele S. Contraceptive utilization and associated factors among women of reproductive age group in Southern Nations Nationalities and Peoples’ Region, Ethiopia: cross-sectional survey, mixed-methods. Contracept Reprod Med [Internet]. 2017;2(1):10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Tukue D, Gebremeskel TG, Gebremariam L, Aregawi B, Hagos MG, Gebremichael T, et al. Prevalence and determinants of modern contraceptive utilization among women in the reproductive age group in Edaga-hamus Town, Eastern zone, Tigray region, Ethiopia, June 2017. PLoS One. 2020;15(3):1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Tesfaye G, Loxton D, Chojenta C, et al. Delayed initiation of antenatal care and associated factors in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Health. 2017;14:150.

  49. 49.

    Ayalew TW, Nigatu AM. Focused antenatal care utilization and associated factors in Debre Tabor Town, northwest Ethiopia, 2017. BMC Res Notes. 2018;11(1):1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Mekonnen ZA, Lerebo WT, Gebrehiwot TG, Abadura SA. Multilevel analysis of individual and community level factors associated with institutional delivery in Ethiopia. BMC Res Notes. 2015;8(1):1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We would like to express our deepest thankfulness to Measure DHS, for providing the data for the study.



Author information




Proposal preparation, acquisition of data, analysis, and interpretation of data was done by SH, GG BT, AE, GA and DE instruct the study design data cleaning and analysis. SH drafted the manuscript and all authors have a substantial contribution in revising and finalizing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samuel Hailegebreal.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Since the study was a secondary data analysis of publicly available survey data from the MEASURE DHS program, ethical approval and participant consent were not necessary for this particular study. We requested DHS Program and permission was granted to download and use the data for this study from ( We confirm that all methods were carried out in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hailegebreal, S., Gilano, G., Seboka, B.T. et al. Prevalence and associated factors of caesarian section in Ethiopia: a multilevel analysis of the 2019 Ethiopia Mini Demographic Health Survey. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 21, 798 (2021).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Caesarian section
  • Prevalence
  • Multilevel
  • Ethiopia