Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Adherence to Mediterranean diet impacts gastrointestinal microbial diversity throughout pregnancy

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth volume 21, Article number: 558 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Consumption of a diet with high adherence to a Mediterranean diet pattern (MDP) has been associated with a favorable gastrointestinal tract (GIT) microbiome. A healthy GIT microbiome in pregnancy, as defined by increased alpha diversity, is associated with lower chance of adverse perinatal outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of adherence to an MDP on GIT microbial diversity longitudinally throughout pregnancy.

Methods

Adherence to MDP was scored by the Alternate Mediterranean (aMED) Diet Quality Score, after being applied to a validated Food Frequency Questionnaire. Association of aMED Scores with GIT alpha diversity profiles were compared linearly and across time using a linear mixed model, including covariates of age, body mass index (BMI), ethnicity, and parity.

Results

Forty-one participants of Filipino, Japanese, Native Hawaiian, and Non-Hispanic White descent provided dietary information and microbiome samples during each trimester of pregnancy. Alpha diversity profiles changed over gestation, with decreased microbial diversity in the third trimester. aMED scores positively correlated with Chao1 Index and Observed Species Number (r = 0.244, p = 0.017, and r = 0.233, p = 0.023, respectively). The strongest association was detected in the third trimester (Chao 1: r = 0.43, p = 0.020, Observed Species Number: r = 0.41, p = 0.026). Participants with higher aMED scores had higher relative abundance of Acidaminoacaeae at the family level (p = 0.0169), as well as higher abundance of several species known to increase production of short chain fatty acids within the GIT.

Conclusions

Adherence to MDP pattern is associated with increased maternal GIT microbial diversity, and promotes the abundance of bacteria that produce short chain fatty acids. Increased consumption of fruits, vegetables and legumes with low red meat consumption were key components driving this association. The effect of nutrition however, was less of an effect than pregnancy itself. Further studies are needed to determine if adherence to a Mediterranean diet translates not only into microbial health, but also into reduced risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Peer Review reports

Background

Gastrointestinal (GIT) microbiota play a role in protecting or promoting adverse pregnancy outcomes. GIT microbial dysbiosis, as defined as low alpha diversity and reduced levels of butyrate producing bacteria, is associated with bacterial translocation and the promotion of endotoxins, creating systemic inflammation. Such inflammation may lead to preterm labor [1], higher blood pressure [2], and increase the risk of developing gestational diabetes [3]. Thus, improving GIT microbial health may help to mitigate adverse pregnancy outcomes.

At baseline, a normal GIT microbial community shifts throughout pregnancy. There is a natural decline in butyrate-producing bacteria from the Firmicutes (Coprococci, Eubacterium, Roseburia, and Faecalibacterium genera) and Bacteroidetes (Odoribacter and Alistipes genera) phyla [2] at the end of gestation. Bifidobacteria, Proteobacteria, and lactic acid–producing bacteria increase during the third trimester. This process is thought to help facilitate the normally observed increase in inflammation and weight gain to increase energy supply for the fetus [4]. The end result is less alpha diversity and Operational Taxonomic Unit (OTU) richness by the end of the third trimester. Several studies demonstrate that at this point, the composition resembles that of an individual with metabolic syndrome, with increased Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria, and decreased Faecalibacterium [4, 5]. The rate at which these changes occur and the degree to which alpha diversity changes may play a role in avoiding preterm birth, preeclampsia, or other adverse pregnancy outcomes. Furthermore, manipulating microbial diversity over time may be possible with targeting maternal diet.

Several diet patterns have been associated with improved GIT microbial profiles. Vegetarian diets promote higher levels of roseburia and lacnospiraceae, and reduce collinsella, which is associated with higher levels of circulating insulin [6] [7]. Proportions of high fiber and low-fat intake are correlated with greater microbial diversity and lower levels of bacteriodaceae [8]. Polyunsaturated fatty acids also promote gut mucosal integrity and insulin sensitivity by inhibiting inflammation through byproduct fermentation [9]. Particular interest lies in the Mediterranean diet pattern (MDP), which is characterized by high amounts of fiber, lean proteins, fruits and vegetables, and lower consumption of red meats and processed foods. Several studies have noted a beneficial association with consumption of an MDP and GIT microbiome characteristics. MDP adherence is associated with lower levels of lower Escherichia coli, higher amounts of bifidobacteria, and greater amount of bacterial richness. Such a composition leads to high levels of fecal short-chain fatty acids that contribute to epithelial connections, reduce bacterial translocation and improve systemic inflammation which would otherwise lead to chronic disease [10,11,12,13].

Mediterranean diet patterns are also associated with improved maternal and neonatal outcomes including a lower chance of diabetes [14], hypertension during pregnancy [15], excessive gestational weight gain, low birth weight neonates [16], and beneficial metabolic profiling in offspring [17] [18]. The impact of an MDP has not been thoroughly evaluated on the gastrointestinal microbiome during pregnancy. The relationship of improved metabolic health with a Mediterranean diet via increased GIT microbial diversity is established in non-pregnant populations [8] [19], but gaps in knowledge of this relationship among parous women remain. To better understand this relationship, we tested the hypothesis that better adherence to an MDP is associated with higher microbial diversity during pregnancy.

Methods

Study subjects and recruitment

This longitudinal cohort study was approved by the Western Institutional Review Board in compliance with Hawai’i Pacific Health protocol. Women were recruited from the 4 most common ethnic groups in Hawai’i – Japanese, Filipino, Native Hawaiian, and non-Hispanic White [20], in the outpatient setting while awaiting first trimester ultrasound appointments. Inclusion criteria were as such: women aged 18–45 years old, primarily English Speaking and English literate, self-identified as Asian, Non-Hispanic White, or Native Hawaiian on intake registration information form and in their first trimester of pregnancy (< 14 weeks 0 days gestation). While many individuals in Hawai’i have a multiethnic background, participants had to identify as 50% or greater (having one parent that is 100% of their reported heritage) to participate in the study. Native Hawaiians of any percent ethnicity were eligible for participation. Participants that identified as 50% one ethnicity and 50% of another ethnicity were excluded.

Other exclusion criteria included: plans to move out of the area prior to delivery, plan to deliver at another hospital other than our medical center, multiple gestation, pre-existing diabetes or hypertension, heart disease, chronic renal disease, systemic lupus erythematosus, hypothyroidism, history of bariatric surgery, history of an eating disorder, or inflammatory bowel disease, and women who are currently incarcerated.

Data collection

Participation included completing the Multiethnic Cohort Food Frequency Questionnaire (MEC FFQ) three times: once during each trimester, and also collecting microbiome samples via rectal swab at the same time points in each trimester. The first FFQ and bacterial swab collection was completed at time of enrollment, around 11–13 weeks’ gestation. The second collection occurred in the second trimester at the time of their anatomy ultrasound at 18–20 weeks’ gestation. Third trimester samples were collected from 34 to 36 weeks’ gestation.

The MEC-FFQ was developed and validated in a large healthy adult population from 1993 to 1996 in Hawai’i and California [21]. Participants were followed for decades and the tool has proven effective in associating diet with oncologic outcomes and cardiovascular risk. The FFQ includes 182 specific food items uniquely associated with the contemporary local diet such as poi, taro, spam, tofu, salted fish, miso soup, saimin, and fermented foods presumably high in probiotics. Participants were asked recall a typical diet for the previous month. The data extracted from the MEC FFQ was analyzed by the University of Hawai’i Cancer Center Nutrition Shared Support Resource. Adherence to an MDP was scored via the Alternate Mediterranean Diet (aMED) score (Components and Scoring System displayed in Table 1) [22]. The analysis was performed on each questionnaire that was completed, so that each participant had up to three scores.

Table 1 Scoring Components for Alternate Mediterranean Diet (aMED) Score Adapted from Fung et al., 200522
Full size table

Microbiome sequencing

DNA isolation was performed using the AllPrep DNA/RNA Extraction Kit (Qiagen). ThermoFisher Scientific 16S rRNA primers were then used to create bacterial DNA libraries for sequencing according to manufacturer’s instructions. Metagenomic sequencing was carried out on the Ion Genestudio S5 Sequencer (ThermoFisher Scientific). V2–4-8, V3–6, V7–9 primers are used to amplify the hypervariable regions of the 16S rRNA gene from bacteria. The Ion Torrent Data analysis platform was used to align sequence fragments and provide OTUs at the family, genus, and species level. These reads were used to assign alpha and beta diversity scores through the Ion Torrent Software. The α-diversity indexes were computed after rarefraction was performed, using the average value of the 10 rarefied value at sequence number 15,927.

Data analysis

Characteristics of the participants were summarized by mean and standard deviation for continuous variable, frequencies, and percentages for categorical variables. Two-tailed Student’s t test, ANOVA or χ2 test were used to test the differences of these variables respectively. Variables were log transformed to improve normality and homoscedasticity where appropriate. Non-parametric tests (Mann Whitney U, Kruskal Wallis Test) was applied for non-normally distributed data. Repeated Measures ANOVA with multiple comparison test via Tukey HSD as post-hoc analysis was used to compare alpha diversity (Shannon Index, Chao 1 Scores, Simpson and Observed number of Species) indexes with demographic characteristics such as ethnicity and obesity aggregately among trimesters. Beta diversity profiles were analyzed with PCA among each ethnic group during each trimester after Euclidean Distance Matrix was developed. The primary outcome measures of correlation of aMED score with alpha diversity score were compared with Pearson correlation as well as linear mixed model while accounting for confounders such as age, Body Mass Index (BMI), ethnicity and parity. All data analyses were performed using R Studio version 1.0.136 (http://www.r-project.org/) and a two-tailed p-value of less than 0.05 was be regarded as statistically significant.

Results

For this study, forty-one participants in total were recruited. There were 10 (24.3%) participants each of Non-Hispanic White, Filipino, Japanese descent and 11 (26.8%) participants of Native Hawaiian descent. The average age of the cohort was 29, and the majority were nulliparous (n = 22, 56%). Average BMI was 27.2 kg/m2, with only 17% (n = 11) being obese. Demographic data for those scoring below versus above the median aMED score are listed in Table 2.

Table 2 Composite results from all three trimesters for all participants who completed FFQs, according to Energy adjusted aMED Score (those who scored below and above the median). Aggregate Nutrient Consumption is displayed as mean (SD), and compared via t-test
Full size table

FFQs results were available for 40 participants during the first trimester, 37 for the second trimester, and 33 for the third trimester. Loss to follow-up or withdrawal from the study occurred for 1 patient after the first trimester (termination of pregnancy), and 4 participants after the second trimester collection (1 termination due to pre-viable preeclampsia with severe features, 1 s trimester loss, 1 elective termination and 1 participant moved away). During the third trimester, there were an additional 8 participants who were lost to follow up and did not fill out their survey in the mail, with results for 33 participants in the third trimester. Attempt was made to contact all patients after delivery, regardless if 3rd trimester sample was not collected at 34–36 weeks gestation, in order to gain information about pregnancy outcomes. Pregnancy outcome data was available for 39 of 41 participants. After filtering for DNA quality and samples that yielded greater than 10,000 unique 16S-based sequencing reads, results were available for 35 participants from the first, 36 from the second, and 30 from the third trimester. Data is displayed from participants who had paired data of both FFQ and microbiome in each trimester.

Diet quality

The aggregate distribution of the aMED scores was normally distributed among all three trimesters, (Supplementary Fig. 1). The diet scores among each ethnic group are shown in Fig. 1 – aggregately and according to Trimester (Panel A). Overall, Native Hawaiian participants had higher adherence to Mediterranean diet quality than Filipino participants (p = 0.005), as did Japanese (non-significant (NS), p = 0.06). These differences were primarily comprised of scores in the third trimester, as demonstrated in Fig. 1 Panel B (NS). There were no differences in scores of those who are obese versus non-obese (mean = 3.9 vs 4.2, p = 0.56).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Box plot of aMED scores for each ethnic group aggregately for all trimesters (PANEL A) (mean – solid line, SD- whisker). aMED scores in to each trimester (PANEL B) showing the mean (•) and Standard deviations (dashed lines)

Full size image

Microbiome data

Overall, 577 different OTUs were identified. Differences were detected among aggregate abundance at the family level among ethnicities. We observed greater abundance of lactobacillaceae in Japanese and Filipino compared to Non-Hispanic White and Native Hawaiian participants (p = 0.018). Non-Hispanic White women tended to have higher Porphyromonadaceae (NS). Native Hawaiians had higher levels of Acidaminococcaceae (NS) (Fig. 2), and the highest ratios of Prevotellaceae to Bacteroidaceae, versus Non-Hispanic white women had the lowest ratios (NS).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Aggregate OTU abundance at the family level across all trimesters according to ethnicity

Full size image

The most abundant phyla and families according to trimester are shown in Fig. 3. There is a shift in the types and abundance of microbes present between the first and second trimesters to the third trimester. Consistent with other observations [4], alpha diversity decreased significantly over time from first to third trimester. The rate of change was not different between those who scored above and below the mean aMED Score (Fig. 4). There was also no difference detected in the rate of change over time among participants of different ethnicities or those who were obese versus non-obese (not shown). Principal Component Analysis plots are shown to compare samples. Third trimester samples segregate away from first and second in the distance matrix (Fig. 5), demonstrating a shift of microbial composition at the end of gestation. There was no distinct grouping among those who had higher aMED diet quality scores versus those who had lower scores, and no distinct groupings among ethnicity or BMI class (not shown).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Phylum (Top panel) and Family (bottom panel) distribution across all samples according to trimester. The most abundant phyla are Proteobacteria, Fusobacteria, Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Actinobacteria

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

Alpha Diversity profiles according to trimester for those averaging above and below the median aMED diet quality score

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure 5

Principal Component Analysis of OTUs at the family level, compared by aMED Score and Trimester. aMED Scores above the mean are represented by circles and scores below the mean are represented by triangles

Full size image

The primary test for a relationship between alpha diversity metrics and aMED Score was evaluated as a linear correlation, with the hypothesis that better adherence to the Mediterranean diet would increase alpha diversity. While bivariate analysis of those above and below the mean did not show a rate of change over time (Fig. 4), there was linear correlation with aMED score and alpha diversity of the GIT microbiome. Table 3 shows the correlation coefficient for all diversity metrics with combined aMED scores, irrespective of trimester. The correlation is primarily supported by the association in the third trimester with regards to overall richness, as measured by Chao1 Index and Observed species number (Fig. 6). Specifically, this comparison is visualized in a scatterplot, with aMED score on the X axis, and alpha diversity measures on the Y-axis (Fig. 6). Overall evenness of the species (as measured by Shannon and Simpson index) was not impacted by aMED score (Table 2 and Fig. 6). To determine the relationship between observed species number and aMED score, multivariate linear mixed-effect model was implemented using lme4 package in R. Fixed effect covariates included obesity, parity, ethnicity, trimester and age, while subject was treated as random effects. Visual inspection of residual plots did not reveal any obvious deviations from homoscedasticity or normality. No significant correlation or covariate was produced from the model, except for aMED score (B-estimate 4.83, 95% Confidence Interval 1.5–8.14).

Table 3 Correlation between aggregate aMED score and α-diversity indexes
Full size table
Fig. 6
figure 6

Pearson correlation of each alpha diversity metric with aMED Score according to Trimester. Correlation Coefficients (R) are listed in order of Trimester (1st, 2nd, and 3rd), with associated p-values

Full size image

To further understand the relationship above, the OTU abundance at the family level was compared via non-parametric t-test among those with high versus low aMED scores. There is a greater abundance of Acidaminoaceae in the those that scored the highest compared to than those with the lowest aMED scores. (p = 0.0169). Interestingly, there is also a trend for higher diet quality being associated with increased Prevotellaceae. The ratio of Prevotellaceae to Bacteroidaceae was normalized by log transformation and compared among high and low aMED scores. Those with higher aMED scores had higher Prevotellaceae: Bacteroidaceae ratios (Supplementary Material Fig. 2), especially in the third trimester. At the species level, several species associated with the highest AMED scores (> 6) and are listed in Table 4.

Table 4 Species with significant correlations with the highest aMED Scores (> 6)
Full size table

Fig. 7 shows the differences in components of the aMED score in those with the highest (green) and lowest (orange) Chao1 scores. Participants with greater alpha diversity as measured by the Chao1 Index tended score a point more frequently in the aMED categories of vegetables, fruit, nuts, legumes, and red meat (equating to less red meat), compared to those with lower Chao1 scores. There were not large differences in the amount of fish or monosaturated to saturated fats consumed. Other macro and micronutrients did not differ between those of high versus low alpha diversity scores, except for the amount of polyunsaturated fats. And while those with higher aMED scores consumed larger amounts of fiber, this was not independently correlated with alpha diversity metrics. There were no differences in the amount of fiber between those of high versus low Chao1 scores.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Components of aMED Score for paired GIT microbiome samples with the lowest and highest alpha diversity as measured by specimens in the bottom and top 25th percentiles of Chao1 Index scores

Full size image

Pregnancy outcomes

Pregnancy data was available for 39 participants from the cohort, and complete paired data for 36 participants. Nine (25%) women developed Pregnancy-induced Hypertension (PIH) (including gestational hypertension, PreEclampsia with and without severe features). Four participants (11.11%) developed gestational diabetes (GDM), and 10 (27.8%) participants had excess gestational weight gain (GWG) beyond the amount of gestational weight gain recommended by the Institute of Medicine (IOM). One participant had a second trimester loss due to cervical insufficiency, and another preterm birth at 36 weeks. Exploratory analysis was performed to look at mean differences of alpha diversity profiles among women who did and did not develop the most common adverse pregnancy outcomes (PIH, GDM, and excess GWG). (Supplementary Material Table 1). Comparisons were made from mean scores across all trimesters and according to trimester. No consistent patterns were demonstrated for any of the adverse pregnancy outcomes. Interestingly, women with excess gestational weight gain had higher aMED scores, which is not consistent with previous studies [15], and reflective of the small sample size. Abundance of particular families or genera were not associated with any of these adverse pregnancy outcomes (not shown).

Discussion

The relationship of improved metabolic health with a Mediterranean diet via increased GIT microbial diversity during pregnancy is not well understood, in particular among ethnically diverse women. To our knowledge, this study is the first to characterize dietary patterns and GIT microbiome in a multi-ethnic cohort in the Pacific, and examine this relationship at the microbial species level. The unique makeup of Hawai’i residents is infrequently represented in dietary research of pregnant women [29,30,31]. The population consists of immigrants, first generation individuals, and a large heterogenous group of mixing cultures. As such, dietary patterns are influenced from a variety of sources. There is also a unique consumption of diverse fermented foods such as nato and poi that may contribute to a distinct gut microbiota.

Our cohort followed the widely described transition to decreased diversity under the influence of hormonal shifts across gestation. Commensurate with other published studies of pregnant populations [32] [4], there were significant differences in Shannon, Chao1, Simpson, and observed number of species from first trimester to third trimester. The changes were mostly represented in a decrease in total abundance of lactobacillaceae (p = 0.013), and lachnospiracheae (p = 0.00489), and an increase in prevotellaceae (p = 0.03). On top of this pregnancy shift, MDP adherence influenced microbial diversity over time, even while accounting for BMI, ethnicity and parity. While other studies have demonstrated that diet has more of an influence on microbial composition than body mass index, this was masked in our study by the pregnant cohort [33]. Our primary outcome, a linear correlation with diet quality as measured by adherence to MDP and microbial diversity was demonstrated; Women with higher adherence to the MDP had a smaller decrease in alpha diversity in the third trimester. The benefits of adherence to an MDP is well documented both on development of chronic disease, and likely mechanisms by which these occur – namely inflammation, and aberrant gut microbiota. These relationships have not been specifically explored during pregnancy. Our results offer novel insight into the impact that diet had on microbial composition and richness over pregnancy. Specifically, despite a normal transition to more dysbiosis in the GIT during the third trimester, this shift was mitigated by better adherence to MDP.

One other recent study describes the impact of dietary quality on GIT microbial health during pregnancy. Laitinen et al. measured diet quality by the “Index of Diet Quality” (IDQ) score and alpha diversity in early pregnancy (one time point at less than 18 weeks gestation) [34]. Researchers detected a correlation of diet quality and all indices (Shannon Index, Chao, observed Species number and phylogenetic diversity) within this cohort of overweight and obese women in Finland. They noted the two food components most associated with increased alpha diversity were whole grains and vegetables, similar to our findings. Both our study and Laitinen’s demonstrate that comprehensive diet quality is beneficial for maternal GIT microbial health. While other research has focused on particular micro or macronutrients [8, 35] impact on GIT microbiome, we sought to understand how holistic and balanced nutrition improves the gut microbiome, as this type of dietary pattern is the easiest to which to adhere.

At the species level, several species were noted to be more abundant in those with the highest aMED scores (> 6). While the literature is limited in descriptions of how these organisms directly impact human health, some of the identified species have been described in patients with autoimmune or inflammatory conditions [27, 36, 37]. Several of the species more abundant in participants with higher aMED scores are described as producing beneficial by products such a butyrate and acetic acid (As described in Table 4) [23]. For instance, there was greater abundance of lactobacillus rogosae and alisteps sp. in women with higher aMED Scores in our cohort. These organisms are observed to be decreased in women with gestational diabetes or glucose intolerance during pregnancy [28, 38]. Coprococcus and A. tetradius are also known to produce butyrate and acetic acid, supporting tight mucosal adhesion within the gastrointestinal tract and thus decreasing systemic inflammation [26, 39]. Likewise, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii is associated with decreased cytokine production in patients with Crohn’s disease [25, 40].

Looking at the specific enterotypes represented in this cohort, Prevotella was highly abundant in participants with higher diet quality scores [34]. Within the GIT microbiome, a Prevotella-dominant enterotype is associated with high intake of fiber, carbohydrate, and simple sugars, whereas Bacteroides-dominant enterotype is associated with the high intake of animal fat and protein [24]. De Fillipo et al. and Martinez et al. both describe a Prevotella dominant enterotype is prevalent in populations eating a more traditional diet versus Westernized dietary pattern [41] [42]. As such, this composition led to overall greater microbial richness, and produced higher levels of short-chain fatty acids. In our cohort, Native Hawaiians had the highest abundance of Prevotellaceae, and also had higher adherence to MDP. Yet, this population also has some of the highest adverse pregnancy outcomes in Hawai’i [43, 44]. Further investigation of these relationships is needed to understand what contribution nutrition plays into ethnic-specific disparate birth outcomes.

Mechanistic knowledge is still needed before the connection to translatable, modifiable health interventions utilizing the microbiome is achieved. This study aimed to provide more baseline knowledge about nutrition and the GIT microbiome in pregnancy with the aim to generate new areas of investigation. The majority of research on the microbiome in pregnancy thus far has been directed toward characterizing vaginal microbial communities, with an emphasis on the association with preterm birth. Many studies demonstrate that increased vaginal microbial diversity and depletion lactobacillus-dominant communities are associated with preterm birth [45,46,47]. Researchers hypothesize this is due to acquisition of pathogenic organisms, or from metabolites produced by anerobic microbes [48]. Conversely, little is yet known regarding the GIT microbiome in pregnancy. The specific families, species or communities that are most important have yet to be characterized, and interventions such as probiotics to affect pregnancy health have thus far proven futile [49]. Furthermore, the vaginal and GIT microbiome are closely related, and additional studies are needed to demonstrate how both the vaginal and GIT microbial communities, which are interconnected, contribute to adverse pregnancy outcomes, as well as interventions that can be utilized to impact health outcomes.

Limitations of this study include inherent recall bias by using a Food Frequency Questionnaire. However, FFQs are often structured to have patients recall what they eat over a predetermined time period. FFQs have been shown to be as accurate as 24-h recall in correlation with biologic specimens showing metabolites and nutrients [50]. Another limitation is our limited sample size. The authors acknowledge the limitation in the observational nature of this small study as hypothesis-generating. The cohort was not powered to measure the ultimate impact of microbial diversity of adverse pregnancy outcomes. While an attempt was made to account for other confounding factors that influence microbial health, some aspects were not captured such as exercise, maternal adiposity, or domestic environment (rural versus urban). However, this study lays the groundwork for future research for understanding the contributions of GIT microbial dysbiosis, nutrition and prevention of adverse perinatal outcomes, and biologic mechanisms by which this occurs. The strengths of this study include it being the first-time diet quality and microbial composition has been described in pregnant women in Hawai’i. Measuring these relationships and changes longitudinally across all three trimesters makes this insightful information even more impactful.

Conclusions

Ultimately, microbial diversity is comprised of several environmental factors including adiposity, environment, geography and diet. The strongest determinant observed in our cohort was pregnancy itself, with the hormonal changes leading to an expected decrease in diversity over time. While to a lesser degree, adherence to MDP was also impactful on alpha diversity within the GIT and should be considered when discussing nutrition recommendations with pregnant women.

Availability of data and materials

Following the acceptance of our manuscript for publication, these datasets will be deposited into appropriate databases including the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database, the NCBI Short Read Archives (SRA), MicrobiomeDB, and other relevant databases and made freely available to investigators at academic institutions worldwide.

Abbreviations

aMED:

Alternate Mediterranean Diet

BMI:

Body Mass Index

GDM:

Gestational Diabetes

GIT:

Gastrointestinal

GWG:

Gestational Weight Gain

IDQ:

Index of Diet Quality

IOM:

Institute of Medicine

MDP:

Mediterranean diet pattern

MEC FFQ:

Multiethnic Cohort Food Frequency Questionnaire

OTU:

Operational Taxonomic Unit

PIH:

Pregnancy-Induced Hypertension

References

  1. Dahl C, Stanislawski M, Iszatt N, Mandal S, Lozupone C, Clemente JC, et al. Gut microbiome of mothers delivering prematurely shows reduced diversity and lower relative abundance of Bifidobacterium and Streptococcus. PLoS One. 2017;12(10):e0184336. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184336.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Gomez-Arango LF, Barrett HL, McIntyre HD, Callaway LK, Morrison M, Dekker Nitert M, et al. Increased systolic and diastolic blood pressure is associated with altered gut microbiota composition and butyrate production in early pregnancy. Hypertension. 2016;68(4):974–81. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.116.07910.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Crusell MKW, Hansen TH, Nielsen T, Allin KH, Ruhlemann MC, Damm P, et al. Gestational diabetes is associated with change in the gut microbiota composition in third trimester of pregnancy and postpartum. Microbiome. 2018;6(1):89. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-018-0472-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Koren O, Goodrich JK, Cullender TC, Spor A, Laitinen K, Backhed HK, et al. Host remodeling of the gut microbiome and metabolic changes during pregnancy. Cell. 2012;150(3):470–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.07.008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu J, Yang H, Yin Z, Jiang X, Zhong H, Qiu D, et al. Remodeling of the gut microbiota and structural shifts in preeclampsia patients in South China. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017;36(4):713–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-016-2853-z.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gomez-Arango LF, Barrett HL, Wilkinson SA, Callaway LK, McIntyre HD, Morrison M, et al. Low dietary fiber intake increases Collinsella abundance in the gut microbiota of overweight and obese pregnant women. Gut Microbes. 2018;9(3):189–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2017.1406584.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Barrett HL, Gomez-Arango LF, Wilkinson SA, McIntyre HD, Callaway LK, Morrison M, et al. A vegetarian diet is a majordeterminant of gut microbiota composition in early pregnancy. Nutrients. 2018;10(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10070890.

  8. Roytio H, Mokkala K, Vahlberg T, Laitinen K. Dietary intake of fat and fibre according to reference values relates to higher gut microbiota richness in overweight pregnant women. Br J Nutr. 2017;118(5):343–52. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114517002100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Alcock J, Lin HC. Fatty acids from diet and microbiota regulate energy metabolism. F1000Res. 2015;4:738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gutierrez-Diaz IF-NT, Salazar N, Bartolome B, Moreno-Arribas MV, de Andres-Galiana EJ, Fernandez-Martinez JL, et al. Adherence to a Mediterranean diet influences the fecal metabolic profile of microbial- derived phenolics in a Spanish cohort of middle-age and older people. J Agric Food Chem. 2017;65(3):586–95. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.6b04408.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mitsou EK, Kakali A, Antonopoulou S, Mountzouris KC, Yannakoulia M, Panagiotakos DB, et al. Adherence to the Mediterranean diet is associated with the gut microbiota pattern and gastrointestinal characteristics in an adult population. Br J Nutr. 2017;117(12):1645–55. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114517001593.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Garcia-Mantrana I, Selma-Royo M, Alcantara C, Collado MC. Shifts on gut microbiota associated to Mediterranean diet adherence and specific dietary intakes on general adult population. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:890. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00890.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. De Filippis FPN, Vannini L, Jeffery IB, La Storia A, Laghi L, Serrazanetti DI, et al. High-level adherence to a Mediterranean diet beneficially impacts the gut microbiota and associated metabolome. Gut. 2016;65(11):1812–21. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309957.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Amati F, Hassounah S, Swaka A. The impact of Mediterranean dietary patterns during pregnancy on maternal and offspringhealth. Nutrients. 2019;11(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11051098.

  15. Schoenaker DA, Soedamah-Muthu SS, Mishra GD. Quantifying the mediating effect of body mass index on the relation between a Mediterranean diet and development of maternal pregnancy complications: the Australian longitudinal study on Women's health. Am J Clin Nutr. 2016;104(3):638–45. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.116.133884.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Martinez-Galiano JM, Olmedo-Requena R, Barrios-Rodriguez R, Amezcua-Prieto C, Bueno-Cavanillas A, Salcedo-Bellido I, et al. Effect of adherence to a Mediterranean diet and olive oil intake during pregnancy on risk of small for gestational age infants.Nutrients. 2018;10(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10091234.

  17. Gesteiro ERBB, Bastida S, Sánchez-Muniz FJ. Maternal diets with low healthy eating index or Mediterranean diet adherence scores are associated with high cord-blood insulin levels and insulin resistance markers at birth. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2012;66(9):1008–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2012.92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lorite Mingot D, Gesteiro E, Bastida S, Sanchez-Muniz FJ. Epigenetic effects of the pregnancy Mediterranean diet adherence on the offspring metabolic syndrome markers. J Physiol Biochem. 2017;73(4):495–510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13105-017-0592-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Maskarinec G, Hullar MAJ, Monroe KR, Shepherd JA, Hunt J, Randolph TW, et al. Fecal microbial diversity and structure are associated with diet quality in the multiethnic cohort adiposity phenotype study. J Nutr. 2019;149(9):1575–84. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/nxz065.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. U.S. Census Bureau: 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates. https://www.census.gov. Accessed 18 Oct 2018.

  21. Kolonel LN, Henderson BE, Hankin JH, Nomura AM, Wilkens LR, Pike MC, et al. A multiethnic cohort in Hawaii and Los Angeles: baseline characteristics. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;151(4):346–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a010213.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fung TTMM, Newby PK, Manson JE, Meigs JB, Rifai N, Willett WC, et al. Diet-quality scores and plasma concentrations of markers of inflammation and endothelial dysfunction. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;82(1):163–73. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/82.1.163.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Van Gylswyk NO, Hippe H, Rainey FA. Pseudobutyrivibrio ruminis gen. nov., sp. nov., a Butyrate-Producing Bacterium from the Rumen That Closely Resembles Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens in Phenotype. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1996;46(2):559–63. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-46-2-559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wu GD, Chen J, Hoffmann C, Bittinger K, Chen YY, Keilbaugh SA, et al. Linking long- term dietary patterns with gut microbial enterotypes. Science. 2011;334(6052):105–8. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1208344.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Sokol H, Pigneur B, Watterlot L, Lakhdari O, Bermudez-Humaran LG, Gratadoux JJ, et al. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii is an anti-inflammatory commensal bacterium identified by gut microbiota analysis of Crohn disease patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(43):16731–6. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0804812105.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Ezaki T, Kawamura Y, Li N, Li ZY, Zhao L, Shu S. Proposal of the genera Anaerococcus gen. Nov., Peptoniphilus gen. Nov. and Gallicola gen. Nov. for members of the genus Peptostreptococcus. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2001;51(4):1521–8. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-51-4-1521.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Qin P, Zou Y, Dai Y, Luo G, Zhang X, Xiao L. Characterization a novel butyric acid-producing bacterium Collinsella aerofaciens Subsp. Shenzhenensis Subsp Nov. Microorganisms. 2019;7:1-10. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7030078.

  28. Wu Y, Bible PW, Long S, Ming WK, Ding W, Long Y, et al. Metagenomic analysis reveals gestational diabetes mellitus-related microbial regulators of glucose tolerance. Acta Diabetol. 2020;57(5):569–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-019-01434-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rifas-Shiman SL, Rich-Edwards JW, Kleinman KP, Oken E, Gillman MW. Dietary quality during pregnancy varies by maternal characteristics in project viva: a US cohort. J Am Diet Assoc. 2009;109(6):1004–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2009.03.001.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Rifas-Shiman SL, Rich-Edwards JW, Willett WC, Kleinman KP, Oken E, Gillman MW. Changes in dietary intake from the first to the second trimester of pregnancy. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2006;20(1):35–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3016.2006.00691.x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Shapiro AL, Kaar JL, Crume TL, Starling AP, Siega-Riz AM, Ringham BM, et al. Maternal diet quality in pregnancy and neonatal adiposity: the healthy start study. Int J Obes. 2016;40(7):1056–62. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2016.79.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Smid MC, Ricks NM, Panzer A, McCoy AN, Azcarate-Peril MA, Keku TO, et al. Maternal gut microbiome biodiversity in pregnancy. Am J Perinatol. 2018;35(1):24–30. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1604412.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Davis SC, Yadav JS, Barrow SD, Robertson BK. Gut microbiome diversity influenced more by the westernized dietary regime than the body mass index as assessed using effect size statistic. Microbiologyopen. 2017;6(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.476.

  34. Laitinen K, Mokkala K. Overall dietary quality relates to gut microbiota diversity and abundance. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20081835.

  35. Mokkala K, Roytio H, Munukka E, Pietila S, Ekblad U, Ronnemaa T, et al. Gut microbiota richness and composition and dietary intake of overweight pregnant women are related to serum Zonulin concentration, a marker for intestinal permeability. J Nutr. 2016;146(9):1694–700. https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.116.235358.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhou CZH, Xiao XY, Chen BD, Guo RJ, Wang Q, Chen H, et al. Metagenomic profiling of the pro-inflammatory gut microbiota in ankylosing spondylitis. J Autoimmun. 2020;107:102360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaut.2019.102360.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kang DWIZ, Isern NG, Hoyt DW, Howsmon DP, Shaffer M, Lozupone CA, et al. Differences in fecal microbial metabolites and microbiota of children with autism spectrum disorders. Anaerobe. 2018;49:121–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2017.12.007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Festa C, Corleto VD, Toscano M, Bitterman O, Drago L, Napoli A. Flash on gut microbiome in GDM and non-GDM pregnancies. Diabetes. 2018;67(Supplement 1):2345–PUB. https://doi.org/10.2337/db18-2345-PUB.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Holdeman LVM, Moore WE. New Genus, Coprococcus, Twelve New Species, and Emended Descriptions of Four Previously Described Species of Bacteria from Human Feces. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1974;24:260–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Lopez-Siles M, Duncan SH, Garcia-Gil LJ, Martinez-Medina M. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii: from microbiology to diagnostics and prognostics. ISME J. 2017;11(4):841–52. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2016.176.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. De Filippo CCD, Di Paola M, Ramazzotti M, Poullet JB, Massart S, Collini S, et al. Impact of diet in shaping gut microbiota revealed by a comparative study in children from Europe and rural Africa. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(33):14691–6. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1005963107.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Horwood PF, Tarantola A, Goarant C, Matsui M, Klement E, Umezaki M, et al. Health challenges of the Pacific region: insights from history, geography, social determinants, genetics, and the microbiome. Front Immunol. 2019;10:2184. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.02184.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. March of Dimes Report Card. https://www.marchofdimes.org/peristats/tools/reportcard.aspx?frmodrc=1&reg=15. Accessed 12 Jan 2021.

  44. Chang AL, Hurwitz E, Miyamura J, Kaneshiro B, Sentell T. Maternal risk factors and perinatal outcomes among pacific islander groups in Hawaii: a retrospective cohort study using statewide hospital data. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15(1):239. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0671-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Hyman RW, Fukushima M, Jiang H, Fung E, Rand L, Johnson B, et al. Diversity of the vaginal microbiome correlates with preterm birth. Reprod Sci. 2014;21(1):32–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719113488838.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Brown RG, Marchesi JR, Lee YS, Smith A, Lehne B, Kindinger LM, et al. Vaginal dysbiosis increases risk of preterm fetal membrane rupture, neonatal sepsis and is exacerbated by erythromycin. BMC Med. 2018;16(1):9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-017-0999-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Stout MJ, Zhou Y, Wylie KM, Tarr PI, Macones GA, Tuuli MG. Early pregnancy vaginal microbiome trends and preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217:356.e351–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Stafford GP, Parker JL, Amabebe E, Kistler J, Reynolds S, Stern V, et al. Spontaneous preterm birth is associated with differential expression of vaginal metabolites by lactobacilli-dominated microflora. Front Physiol. 2017;8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00615.

  49. Callaway LK, McIntyre HD, Barrett HL, Foxcroft K, Tremellen A, Lingwood BE, et al. Probiotics for the prevention of gestational diabetes mellitus in overweight and obese women: findings from the SPRING double-blind randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2019. p. dc182248. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc18-2248.

  50. Feskanich DRE, Giovannucci EL, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, Litin LB, Willett WC. Reproducibility and validity of food intake measurements from a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire. J Am Diet Assoc. 1993;93(7):790–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-8223(93)91754-E.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the University of Hawaii John A. Burns School of Medicine Epigenomics Core for their efforts in performing the microbiome sequencing.

Funding

This project was funded by the OLA Hawaii Project, is which supported by a grant from the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (U54MD007601), as well as the Lakshmi Devi and Devraj Sharma Foundation. The funding agencies had no involvement in the collection, analysis, interpretation of data or writing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. John A Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawai’i at Mānoa, Honolulu, USA

    Corrie B. Miller, Paula Benny, Jonathan Riel & Men-Jean Lee

  2. John A. Burns School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women’s Health, 1319 Punahou Street, Suite 824, Honolulu, HI, 96826, USA

    Corrie B. Miller, Paula Benny, Jonathan Riel & Men-Jean Lee

  3. University of Hawai’i Cancer Center, Epidemiology Program, 701 Ilalo Street Room 525, Honolulu, HI, 96813, USA

    Carol Boushey

  4. Epigenomics Research Program, BSB-222K (office)/BSB-228 (lab), 651 Ilalo Street, Honolulu, HI, 96813, USA

    Rafael Perez & Alika K. Maunakea

  5. John A. Burns School of Medicine Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, 651 Ilalo Street, Medical Education Building Suite 411, Honolulu, HI, 96813, USA

    Vedbar Khadka & Yujia Qin

Authors
  1. Corrie B. Miller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Paula Benny
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jonathan Riel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Carol Boushey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Rafael Perez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Vedbar Khadka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yujia Qin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Alika K. Maunakea
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Men-Jean Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

CM was the principal investigator for the study, and primarily responsible for IRB, study design, participant enrollment, sample acquisition, statistical analysis and is the primary author of manuscript. PB enrolled participants and performed DNA extraction, readied samples for sequencing. JR: performed DNA extraction and prepared samples for microbiome sequencing. CB was instrumental in study design and nutritional analysis. RDP performed microbiome sequencing. VK performed the bioinformatic analysis. YQ performed bioinformatic and statistical analysis. AM contributed to study design and performed microbiome sequencing. MJL contributed to study design and enrolled participants. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Corrie B. Miller.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Western Institutional Review Board (WIRB) IRB# 2018–039 – Written informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent for publication

Participants signed informed consent regarding publishing their data.

Competing interests

The authors have no financial disclosures.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Mean values [with (Standard Deviation) below] of alpha diversity and aMED scores were compared among those who did and did not develop the most common pregnancy complications in the cohort. Pregnancy outcome and microbiome data was available for 36 participants.

Additional file 2: Fig. S1.

Aggregate distribution of all reported energy adjusted aMED scores.

Additional file 3: Fig. S2.

Prevotella:Bacteroides Ratios among those above (right panel) and below (left panel) the median aMED score. Participants with lower aMED scores had lower ratios in the third trimester.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Miller, C.B., Benny, P., Riel, J. et al. Adherence to Mediterranean diet impacts gastrointestinal microbial diversity throughout pregnancy. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 21, 558 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-04033-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-04033-8

Keywords

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

ISSN: 1471-2393

Contact us