Skip to main content

Vagus nerve stimulation ameliorates L-NAME-induced preeclampsia-like symptoms in rats through inhibition of the inflammatory response



Preeclampsia is characterized by an excessive inflammatory response. Recent studies have shown that vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has anti-inflammatory properties in vivo. This study aims to investigate whether VNS is safe for use during pregnancy and to explore the therapeutic potential and underlying mechanisms of VNS in PE.


Pregnant Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly chosen to receive N-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME)-containing water (preeclampsia-like mouse model) or saline (normal pregnancy control) daily at gestational days 14.5–20.5. VNS and the α7nAChR antagonist methyllycaconitine citrate (MLA, 1 mg/kg/d) were given daily at the same time.


VNS decreased the high systolic blood pressure and urinary protein observed in the PE rats. In addition, VNS mitigated abnormal pregnancy outcomes. Moreover, VNS alleviated the inflammatory response by decreasing the levels of inflammatory cytokines. VNS significantly increased the expression of α7nAChR and attenuated the activation of NF-κB p65 in the placenta.


Our findings indicate that maternal VNS treatment is safe during pregnancy and has a protective effect in a pregnant rat model of preeclampsia induced by L-NAME.

Peer Review reports


Preeclampsia is a multifactorial and multisystemic disorder that occurs during pregnancy and that can lead to increased morbidity or mortality in both the mother and her unborn child [1]. A recent report shows that 2–8% of all pregnant women worldwide suffer from preeclampsia [2]. Preeclampsia is diagnosed by new onset hypertension (systolic pressure ≥ 140 mmHg and/or diastolic pressure ≥ 90 mmHg), which occurs most often after 20 weeks of gestation, and often accompanied by proteinuria [3]. The considerable variation in the onset, clinical manifestation, and severity of this pregnancy-specific disease creates major challenges in the balance of benefits and risks of delivery. Currently, the delivery of the placenta remains the only definitive cure for preeclampsia [1, 4].

Despite the severity of preeclampsia, the precise pathogenesis is not yet fully understood and is currently an area of active research [4]. A series of potential etiologies of preeclampsia, including endothelial dysfunction [5], excessive inflammation [6], immunological dysregulation [7] and oxidative stress [8], has been identified. Among these potential etiologies, the imbalance in pro- and anti-inflammatory networks has emerged as the one phenomenon that is most strongly related to the clinical symptoms and disease severity of preeclampsia. There is growing evidence that preeclampsia is closely linked to an abnormal inflammation response that reveals both locally in the placenta and systemically in the mother [9, 10]. Quenching or inhibiting inflammatory regulation pathways may be a real mechanism of the pathogenesis of preeclampsia. As such, therapies that selectively suppress the excessive inflammatory response without leading to broad immunosuppression are desired.

Preventing pro-inflammatory cytokine production through endogenous “neuro-immune” interactions has emerged as one such treatment. Tracey has revealed that the vagally mediated cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway (CAP) is capable of acutely attenuating inflammation [11]. Electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve is known to have to have anti-inflammatory effects on multiple diseases, including ischemia reperfusion injury [12], sepsis [13] and rheumatoid arthritis [14]. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is an effective nonpharmacologic approach for the treatment of inflammatory disease, but the use of VNS to inflammatory response following preeclampsia has not been thoroughly examined. Therefore, this research aimed to investigate whether VNS attenuate preeclampsia and to explore the underlying mechanisms involved using a preeclamptic model in rats.

Sprague Dawley rats

An approximately of 6–8 weeks old (weight range: 250–300 g) Sprague-Dawley rats were obtained from the Medical Experimental Animal Center of Hainan. The experimental rats selected were fed with regular chow and water ad libitum under controlled conditions of temperature (22–24 °C), humidity (50–70%), and lighting (12:12-h light–dark cycle) [15]. The protocols for animal use and the procedures for the experiments described here were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Hainan Medical University, China (ratification NO 2020–185), and the experiments were performed according to the Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.

Experimental design

The female-male rats were placed in a ratio of 2:1, 7 days after acclimatization. The sperms presence in vaginal smears were used as a definition of gestational day (GD) 0. A single oral daily dose of 50 mg/kg L-NAME or distilled water from GD 14.5 to GD 20.5 was given to the experimental rats during pregnancy [16]. The rats were then put randomly into 8 groups, consisting 7–8 rats in a group as follows: Group 1, the normal control group, received distilled water. Group 2, the P + Sham control group, was treated as group 1 but subjected to sham stimulation daily for 7 days. Group 3, the P + VNS control group, was treated as group 1 but received vagus nerve stimulation for 7 days. Group 4, the P + VNS + MLA control group, was also treated as group 3 but MLA i.v. injection dose of 1 mg/kg/day was given daily for 7 days. Group 5, the PE group, was given L-NAME daily for 7 days. The PE + Sham group, Group 6, was treated as group 5 but exposed to sham stimulation. Group 7, the PE + VNS group, was treated as group 5 but with an additional daily vagus nerve stimulation for 7 days. Group 8, the PE + VNS+ MLA group, had group 7 treatment with an additional i.v. injection of MLA at a daily dose of 1 mg/kg/day for 7 days.

VNS and sham surgery

Surgical protocols were previously described in detail [17]. In brief, the rats were anesthetized with isoflurane (5% in 100%O2) inhalation and maintained with a gas mask (2% isoflurane). The skin and muscles of the left cervical region were separated carefully, and then, the cuff was placed and fixed with a suture around the nerve. Continuous stimulation was delivered by a stimulator (BL-420, TME Technology Co., Ltd., Chengdu, China) on the cervical vagal trunk connected to a control module. The stimulation duration of the implanted VNS device was set to 30 min at the given frequency and was followed by an off-time of 5.5 h; this procedure was repeated 4 times per day from GD 14.5 to GD 20.5. The stimulation parameters are identical to those used in our previous study [18], namely, a stimulation frequency of 5 Hz, a low voltage of 3 V, a current of 1 mA and a pulse duration of 500 μs. For the sham rats, the surgery was performed in the same way, but the cuff electrode was not implanted.

Measurement of blood pressure and heart rate

The tail-cuff technique with a BP-2000 Blood Pressure Analysis System (Visitech Systems Inc., North Carolina, USA) was used to test systolic blood pressure and heart rate in all the groups of rats on the GDs 12, 14, 16, 18 and 20. AS previously described, the cuff was placed around the tail, inflated to block blood flow, and then slowly deflated conferring to the internal programmer [19]. Each rat received 37 °C 30 min pre-warmed before each measurement was taken with each measured 3 times to obtain the average values.

Urine protein concentration

On the GDs 13, 15, 17 and 19, the rats were housed separately for 24 h under the cages to collect urine samples. Urine samples were centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 15 min at 22 °C, and the supernatant was used for the analysis of protein levels by using a BCA protein assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., CN, Shanghai).

Sample preparation

The experimental rats at GD 21, underwent cesarean section after anesthetize with isoflurane inhalation. The placentas and pups were dissected, inspected, counted, and weighed. The blood from the inferior cava vena were collected into plain bottles. Each placenta was placed in 4% paraformaldehyde fixation immediately after being washed by 0.9% NaCl, and embedded in paraffin, or placed in Trizol for real-time PCR, or frozen in liquid nitrogen for biochemical analysis and Western blot analysis. All the experimental maternal and neonatal rats were euthanized with a lethal dose of isoflurane (10–20%) inhalation immediately after the procedure.

Histology and immunohistochemistry

The placental specimens were placed in 4–5 μm thick paraffin sections, stained with hematoxylin and eosin by the H&E protocol standardization. An optical microscope (Olympus BX51, Tokyo, Japan) was used to observe and photographed. These sections were detected by an eligible and blinded pathologist to assess the extent of pathological changes.

The α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (α7nAChR) and nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) p65 in the placentas were assessed by Immunohistochemical analyses performed. An alcohol gradient was used to deparaffinized and hydrated the placental sections selected for immunostaining. The sections were then incubated in a 1:1000 dilution of primary antibodies against α7nAChR (cat. no. ab10096; Abcam, MA, USA) and NF-κB p65 (cat. no. ab207297; Abcam, MA, USA) overnight at 4 °C. Goat anti-mouse IgG secondary antibodies were added to the sections at 37 °C and incubated for 30 min on the following day. A 3,3′-diaminobenzidine solution (Leica Microsystems, Shanghai, China) was used to dye the sections, counterstained with hematoxylin, dehydrated with ethanol and mounted in synthetic resin. The Image-Pro Plus v6.0 software (Media Cybernetics, Inc., Bethesda, Maryland) was used for the expression of α7nAChR and NF-κB p65 examination by comparing positively labeled areas and total areas. The primary antibody was replaced with goat serum for the negative controls.

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method

AS previously described, the concentrations of TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10 and IFN-γ in the maternal serum and placental homogenate were determined according to the manufacturer’s instructions by ELISA kits (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) [20]. The analysis was performed in duplicate using a Bio-Plex™ system (Luminex Bio-Plex™ 200 System, Bio-Rad).

Measurement of gene expression by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)

Total RNA was extracted from the placental tissues by using TRIzol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The RNA concentration was determined by NanoDrop 2000 analysis (NanoDrop Products, DE, USA). The SuperScript™ VILO™ cDNA Synthesis Kit (Invitrogen, USA) was used for reverse transcription, and the TaqMan Gene Expression Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) was used for qPCR according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The qPCR parameters and all the primers for the amplification of the studied genes (α7nAChR, NF-κB p65 and β-Actin) were used according to Kong et al. [21] Thermal cycler settings were 95 °C for 5 min, then 40 cycles of 95 °C for 20 s and 60 °C for 40 s, and 72 °C for 8 min. The primer sequences (5′ to 3′) for α7nAChR, NF-κB p65 and β-Actin were as follows (forward and reverse, respectively): α7nAChR (ACCTCGTGTGATCCAAAGCC and GGTTTCCTCTTGCTCAGGGT); NF-κB p65 (CGACGTATTGCTGTGCCTTC and TGAGATCTGCCCAGGTGGTAA) and β-Actin (CCTCTATGCCAACACAGTGC and GTACTCCTGCTTGCTGATCC). β-Actin was used as the housekeeping gene. Data analysis was carried out using the 2-ΔΔCT method.

Statistical analysis

The experimental data are reported as the mean ± standard error of the mean. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was done for the comparisons between multiple groups, the least significant difference (LSD) post hoc test or Dunnett’s test were followed. SPSS software, version 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) were used for the data analyzes. P-values of 0.05 were considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.


Effect of VNS on the blood pressure and heart rate of rats with L-NAME-induced preeclampsia

The baseline SBP values were not significantly different among the groups on GD 11 and GD 13 (P > 0.05). On GD 15, the SBP was increased in the L-NAME-treated group, but did not show significant changes compared with the water-treated group (P > 0.05). On GD 17 and GD 20, we observed a significantly lower SBP in the L-NAME-treated rats that were treated with VNS than that in the untreated rats. Moreover, the SBP was not significantly different between the water-treated groups (P > 0.05, data not shown) at that time (Fig. 1a).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Effect of VNS on the blood pressure and heart rate of rats with L-NAME-induced PE. Systolic blood pressure (a) and heart rate (b) of pregnant rats treated or not (control) with L-NAME or L-NAME plus VNS in different periods of pregnancy. Data are presented as Mean + SEM. a p < 0.05, the PE, PE+ sham and PE+ VNS and PE + VNS + MLA groups compared to the P group on GD 17 and GD 20; b p < 0.05, the VNS group compared to the P, PE, PE+ sham and PE + VNS + MLA on GD 17 and GD 20; c p < 0.05, the PE and PE+ sham groups compared to and PE + TaVNS and PE + VNS + MLA groups on GD 17 and GD 20; d p < 0.05, the P and P+ sham groups compared to and P+ VNS and P + VNS + MLA groups on GD 17 and GD 20

In accordance with the SBP, the average baseline HR was similar among the groups (Fig. 1b). L-NAME administration induced a rapid and progressive increase in the HR beginning on GD 17. The rats that received L-NAME and underwent VNS showed an increased HR compared to the control rats but a reduced HR compared to the rats that received L-NAME alone. We also observed that concurrent treatment with VNS and MLA significantly attenuated the elevated HR in the L-NAME-treated rats. Interestingly, among the water-treated groups, the P + VNS or P + VNS + MLA groups exhibited a significantly lower HR than the P and P + sham groups on GD 18 and GD 20 (P < 0.01).

Effect of VNS on urinary protein in rats with L-NAME-induced preeclampsia

At the beginning of the experiment, the degree of proteinuria was not significantly different (P > 0.05) between the groups. The increase in proteinuria after L-NAME treatment was significantly enhanced on GD 17 and 20. VNS administration show a reduction in proteinuria of the L-NAME-treated rats. Moreover, the 24-h urinary protein level was significantly higher in the PE + VNS + MLA rats than in the PE + VNS rats (P < 0.05). The 24-h urinary protein level did not significantly vary throughout pregnancy in the water-treated groups (P > 0.05) (Fig. 2). The data for the P + sham, P + VNS and P + VNS + MLA groups are not shown.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Effect of VNS on urinary protein in rats with L-NAME-induced PE. VNS ameliorated urinary protein in the L-NAME induced PE like rats. The 24-h urinary protein was measured on GDs 11, 13, 15, 17, and 20. Data are presented as Mean + SEM. a p < 0.05, the PE, PE+ sham and PE+ VNS and PE + VNS + MLA groups compared to the P group on GD 17 and GD 20; b p < 0.05, the VNS group compared to the P, PE, PE+ sham and PE + VNS + MLA on GD 17 and GD 20

Effects of VNS on the morphological changes in the placenta in rats with L-NAME-induced preeclampsia

As shown in Fig. 3, optical microscopic observation (H&E staining) revealed slight calcification and a few syncytiotrophoblast nodules of labyrinth of the placenta in the water-treated groups. The labyrinth and junctional zone of the placenta were seriously impaired in the PE and PE + Sham groups, as indicated by substantial inflammatory cell infiltration, large-scale villous infarction and fibrin-like substance deposition. Chronic VNS reversed the detrimental changes in the placenta in the PE + VNS rats. However, the morphological characteristics of placentas in the PE + VNS + MLA group did not differ from those in the PE and PE + Sham groups.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Effects of VNS on the morphological changes in the placenta in rats with L-NAME-induced PE. Changes of placenta structure in pregnant rats (GD 21). a-h Histopathological images of placenta in pregnant rats of (a and e) P, (b and f) P + Sham, (c and g) P + VNS, (d and h) P + VNS+ MLA, (i and m) PE, (j and n) PE + Sham, (k and o) PE + VNS and (l and p) PE + VNS+ MLA groups. Histological section at low (a-d and i-l) and high (e-h and m-p) magnification. LZ: Labyrinth; JZ: Junctional zone. Arrows: syncytiotrophoblast nodules; Red triangle: villous infarction. Red circle: inflammatory cell infiltration; Green circle: calcification; Blue circle: fibrin-like substance deposition. (H&E; low magnification, × 40; scale bar = 30 μm; high magnification, × 100; scale bar = 75 μm)

Effects of VNS on pregnancy outcomes in rats with L-NAME-induced preeclampsia

We chose various indexes to assess pregnancy outcomes, mainly maternal and placental weight, pup weight and live pup number (Table 1). There were no differences in maternal and placental weight among the various groups. L-NAME administration significantly lowered the weight of the pups and the number of living pups compared to those of the pregnant control groups. In addition, VNS treatment during pregnancy significantly alleviated the L-NAME-induced an increase n in the number of resorbed fetuses, but the effects of VNS were abolished by MLA.

Table 1 The effects of VNS treatment on pregnancy outcomes in L-NAME induced PE rats on GD 21

Effects of VNS on the levels of proinflammatory cytokines in both the serum and placenta in rats with L-NAME-induced preeclampsia

We measured the serum and placental protein concentrations of TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10 and IFN-γ in the 8 groups. In the PE and PE + Sham rats, TNF-α was significantly upregulated in both the serum and placenta compared with the levels in the water-treated rats, and the upregulation was significantly inhibited by VNS; this trend was also observed for IL-1β and IL-6. However, the inhibitory effects of VNS were significantly abrogated by MLA (Fig. 4). The levels of IL-10 and IFN-γ in the serum and placenta did not vary significantly across different groups (P > 0.05, data not shown).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Effects of VNS on the levels of proinflammatory cytokines in both the serum and placenta in rats with L-NAME-induced PE. VNS treatment attenuated inflammatory cytokines in both plasma and placenta in L-NAME induced PE rats. Serum TNF-α (a), IL-1β (b) and IL-6 (c), placental TNF-α (d), IL-1β (e) and IL-6 (f) were measured in different group on GD 20. Data were presented as Mean + SEM. aP < 0.05 vs P, P + VNS, P + Sham and P + VNS + MLA; bP < 0.05 vs PE + VNS group

VNS increased placental α7nAChR mRNA and protein expression in rats with L-NAME-induced preeclampsia

The real-time PCR results showed that the α7nAChR mRNA expression was no statistical difference between the P + VNS group and the other water-treated groups. The downregulated α7nAChR mRNA levels following L-NAME treatment were elevated by VNS treatment but not by concurrent treatment with VNS and MLA. No statistically significant differences were observed among the P, P + sham, P + VNS + MLA, PE, PE + sham and PE + VNS + MLA groups (p > 0.05) (Fig. 5a).

Fig. 5
figure 5

The expression of α7nAChR (a) and NF-κB 65 (b) mRNA in the placenta as determined using qPCR. Data were presented as Mean + SEM. aP < 0.05 vs P, P + Sham, P + VNS and P + V NS + MLA; bP < 0.05 vs PE + VNS group

The immunohistochemical assay results also revealed that α7nAChR was mainly localized in the cytoplasm of placental labyrinth zone from the VNS-treated groups. The α7nAChR protein expression was significantly higher in the P + VNS group than in the P and P + sham groups (p < 0.05), and its levels were even higher in the PE + VNS group than that in the PE and PE + sham groups. Moreover, the effects of VNS were significantly blocked by MLA (p < 0.05) (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6
figure 6

The expression of α7nAChR and NF-κB 65 protein in the placenta as determined using immunohistochemistry. a: P group; b: P + Sham group; c: P + VNS group; d: P + VNS + MLA group; e: PE group; f: PE + Sham group; g: PE + VNS group; h: PE + VNS + MLA group. Data were presented as Mean + SEM. aP < 0.05 vs P, P + Sham, PE and PE + Sham groups; bP < 0.05 vs P + VNS + MLA and PE + VNS + MLA groups. cP < 0.05 vs P, P + Sham, P + VNS and P + V NS + MLA groups; dP < 0.05 vs PE + VNS group eP < 0.05 vs PE + VNS + MLA groups. Original magnification: × 400; scale bar =30 μm

VNS increased placental NF-κB 65 mRNA and protein expression in rats with L-NAME-induced preeclampsia

The placental NF-κB 65 mRNA and protein expression levels showed no significant difference (P > 0.05) among the water-treated groups. Maternal exposure to L-NAME significantly increased (P < 0.05) the level of NF-κB 65 mRNA in the placenta. L-NAME-induced placental NF-κB 65 mRNA expression was attenuated (P < 0.05) by VNS treatment during gestation (Fig. 5b).

Immunohistochemical assay results also indicated that the level of placental nuclear NF-κB p65 was significantly increased (P < 0.05) in rats treated with L-NAME (Fig. 6), and this level was decreased (P < 0.05) by VNS administration. However, MLA supplementation dramatically inhibited the VNS-induced decreases in NF-κB p65 mRNA and protein expression (P < 0.05).


In this study, we found that VNS treatment improved adverse pregnancy outcomes, such as decreasing the high SBP and HR, reducing the urinary protein excretion, promoting recovery from placental injury, and suppressing inflammation in rats with L-NAME-induced preeclampsia. Moreover, VNS also increased placental α7nAChR expression and effectively inhibited placental NF-κB p65 activation. Meanwhile, the protective effects of VNS could be blocked by systemic pretreatment with a specific α7nAChR antagonist.

Generalized activation of the inflammatory pathways is thought to play a role in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia [22]. The increased levels of inflammatory cytokines in the amniotic fluid and/or cord blood during preeclampsia are involved in adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes [23]. Taken together, these studies suggest that inflammatory pathways are not only associated with preeclampsia but also may be responsible for adverse neonatal outcomes. There is growing evidence indicating that administering anti-inflammatory agents to the mother may ameliorate the adverse perinatal outcomes of preeclampsia. The treatment of rats in preeclampsia with anti TNF-α antibodies attenuated hypertension and decreased IL-6 and sVCAM-1 levels [24]. As an anti-inflammatory constituent of the herb, uncaria rhynchophylla can suppress inflammation and mitigating preeclampsia-like symptoms in a rat model [19]. There is some evidence suggesting that in addition to anticoagulation, the potential effects of low molecular weight heparin in preventing preeclampsia progress are mediated by suppressing inflammation [25].

The cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway (CAP) bridges the immune and nervous systems [11] and plays multi-effect roles in modulating inflammation. These pathways affect the afferent sensory nerves of the solitary nucleus, which in turn activates the efferent vagus nerve and promotes the release of acetylcholine (Ach). Then, ACh stimulates its receptor, α7nAChR, which results in the inhibition of a key molecular mediator of inflammation [11]. The CAP can also be activated by VNS or α7nAChR stimulation. Previous research has shown that treatment with α7nAChR agonists, such as nicotine [15] and choline [26], relieved preeclampsia symptoms and improved adverse fetal outcomes, including fetal loss and intrauterine growth restriction, in pregnant rats administered LPS. Therefore, we aimed to explore whether the stimulation of efferent vagus nerve directly regulate the inflammatory response to L-NAME during pregnancies in rat model.

L-NAME is a nonspecific nitric oxide synthase inhibitor that has been confirmed to increase the vascular response, block the relaxation of the vascular endothelium and form a narrow spiral artery. Many studies have shown that injection of pregnant rats with L-NAME exhibit preeclampsia-like symptoms [27]. In the present study, a rat model of preeclampsia was successfully established and suitable for further analysis. The results indicated that L-NAME led to an increase in the systolic blood pressure and heart rate during pregnancy. Furthermore, substantial proteinuria, decreased fetal weight, increased embryonic resorption, and high proinflammatory cytokine production in the maternal and placenta of rats were induced.

VNS was a common treatment for epilepsy in more than 100,000 patients, and it is generally well tolerated [28]. Recently, VNS has been found to provide protection against systemic inflammation injury in rats [12]. VNS regulates the CAP and inhibits cytokine synthesis, and subsequent prevention of organs or tissues injury. In addition, VNS is associated with decreased heart rate variability, which is a diagnostic tool in the detection of autonomic impairment in a rat model of inflammatory disease [29]. This study shows that chronic VNS also causes an attenuation of SBP elevation during the development of hypertension in preeclampsia. The effectiveness of VNS’s blood pressure-lowering effects depends on several factors, including the stimulus parameters, position, administration route, and experimental model [30].

In addition, our data further demonstrated that MLA failed to block the effect of VNS on the lower heart rate in VNS-treated animals. This observation suggests that the cardioprotective effect of VNS is independent of its effect on heart rate reduction, which is consistent with a previous study [31]. The efficacy of heart rate reduction by VNS is considered to be contributed to the modulation of the autonomic nervous system, which is related to increased sympathetic activity [32]. Another possibility is that the cardiac electrophysiological regulation by VNS may be modulated through muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChR), since the activation of muscarinic receptors in VNS-mediated cardioprotection was found in the previous study [33].

Proteinuria is not essential to diagnosis but is related to disease severity and fetal outcomes in preeclampsia. In the study, we found proteinuria and fetal growth restriction in L-NAME-treated rats, which is consistent with previous studies [34]. However, mild proteinuria was observed in the VNS-treated rats. We also identified lower fetus weights in the L-NAME-treated groups, which concur with published research papers [35]. Partial reversal of growth retardation was observed in the VNS group, where the weight of the fetuses was similar to that of fetuses from the control group.

The placenta of the rats that received only L-NAME showed histopathological changes including inflammatory cell infiltration, villous infarction and fibrin-like substance deposition. But these changes were maintained at mild intensity after VNS. These data indicate that VNS improved the placental pathology, suggesting that VNS may provide protection for the fetus during preeclampsia.

Previous research has shown that CAP is involved in the limitation of inflammatory responses, which depends on α7nAChR in animal models. α7nAChR was initially found in the nervous system; however, its expression in nonneuronal cells, such as macrophages, endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells and the placenta [36], was only recently discovered. α7nAChR expressed in the placenta may have an anti-inflammatory role and inhibit the activation of endothelial cells, which are involved in the pathophysiology of preeclampsia [27]. In this study, we found that VNS selectively suppressed the pro-inflammatory cytokines production in the serum and placenta but left anti-inflammatory cytokines undisturbed. Additionally, the lower mRNA and protein levels of α7nAChR were observed in the placentas of L-NAME groups. Moreover, we also found that VNS significantly increased the level of α7nAChR expression. These data show that it is reasonable to propose that the inhibition of placental and peripheral cytokine production may be the result of VNS inducing the activation of α7nAChR.

It is well known that NF-κB plays a central role in the expression of genes involved in immune and inflammatory responses [37]. Human study have demonstrated increased NF-κB activation and increased NF-κB activation in vessels and placenta in women with preeclampsia [38]. NF-κB inhibition leads to the suppression of TNF-α, TGF-β1, and IL-10 production [39]. Thus, the pathways involved in NF-kB activation are likely targets for reducing inflammation. The anti-inflammatory properties of α7nAChR-mediated CAP have been attributed to the inhibition of NF-κB activation. NF-κB activation was represented by the ratio of the cytoplasmic to nuclear localization of the NF-κB p65 subunit. Research has shown that VNS exerts anti-inflammatory effects on monocytes challenged with the release of the proinflammatory cytokine TNF-α by partially inhibiting NF-κB p65 activation. VNS treatment attenuated the L-NAME-induced increase in placental nuclear NF-κB p65, while MLA significantly antagonized these effects.


Our research showed that VNS improved PE symptoms and inhibited pro-inflammatory cytokines in a rat model of PE. These findings revealed a novel therapeutic use of VNS for preventing excessive pro-inflammatory cytokines during pregnancy complications. VNS is a non-pharmacological treatment. VNS has emerged as a potential non-pharmaceutical treatment strategy with anti-inflammatory and anti-hypertensive properties. However, different stimulation parameters and sites have been shown to exert distinct therapeutic effects. In this study, we only verified the current stimulation parameters of left-side VNS and found that the heart rate is regulated in normal pregnant rats. Further studies will aim to explore the best stimulation parameters and the underlying mechanisms. Furthermore, the beneficial effects of HRV biofeedback on preeclampsia symptoms and cardiovascular system by increasing vagal tone need to be elucidated in further research.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.



Vagus nerve stimulation


NG-nitro-L arginine methyl ester


Gestational day


Nuclear factor-kB;


Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay


Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor type 7


Methyllycaconitine citrate


Cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway




  1. 1.

    Staff AC, Benton SJ, von Dadelszen P, Roberts JM, Taylor RN, Powers RW, Charnock-Jones DS, Redman CW. Redefining preeclampsia using placenta-derived biomarkers. Hypertension. 2013;61:932–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Brown MA, Magee LA, Kenny LC, Karumanchi SA, McCarthy FP, Saito S, Hall DR, Warren CE, Adoyi G, Ishaku S. The hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: ISSHP classification, diagnosis & management recommendations for international practice. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2018;13:291–310.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Anon. ACOG practice Bulletin no. 202: gestational hypertension and preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133:e1–e25.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Hod T, Cerdeira AS, Karumanchi SA. Molecular Mechanisms of Preeclampsia. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2015;5(10):a023473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Possomato-Vieira JS, Khalil RA. Mechanisms of endothelial dysfunction in hypertensive pregnancy and preeclampsia. Adv Pharmacol. 2016;77:361–431.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Udenze I, Amadi C, Awolola N, Makwe CC. The role of cytokines as inflammatory mediators in preeclampsia. Pan Afr Med J. 2015;20:219.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Przybyl L, Ibrahim T, Haase N, Golic M, Rugor J, Luft FC, Bendix I, Serdar M, Wallukat G, Staff AC, Müller DN, Hünig T, Felderhoff-Müser U, Herse F, LaMarca B, Dechend R. Regulatory T cells ameliorate intrauterine growth retardation in a transgenic rat model for preeclampsia. Hypertension. 2015;65(6):1298–306.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Alpoim PN, Perucci LO, Godoi LC, Goulart COL, Dusse LMS. Oxidative stress markers and thrombomodulin plasma levels in women with early and late severe preeclampsia. Clin Chim Acta. 2018;483:234–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Harmon AC, Cornelius DC, Amaral LM, Faulkner JL, Cunningham MW Jr, Wallace K, LaMarca B. The role of inflammation in the pathology of preeclampsia. Clin Sci (Lond). 2016;130(6):409–19.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Przybyl L, Haase N, Golic M, Rugor J, Solano ME, Arck PC, Gauster M, Huppertz B, Emontzpohl C, Stoppe C, Bernhagen J, Leng L, Bucala R, Schulz H, Heuser A, Weedon-Fekjær MS, Johnsen GM, Peetz D, Luft FC, Staff AC, Müller DN, Dechend R, Herse F. CD74-downregulation of placental macrophage-trophoblastic interactions in preeclampsia. Circ Res. 2016;119(1):55–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Tracey KJ. The inflammatory reflex. Nature. 2002;420(6917):853–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Inoue T, Abe C, Sung SS, Moscalu S, Jankowski J, Huang L, Ye H, Rosin DL, Guyenet PG, Okusa MD. Vagus nerve stimulation mediates protection from kidney ischemia-reperfusion injury through α7nAChR+ splenocytes. J Clin Invest. 2016;126(5):1939–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Mihaylova S, Killian A, Mayer K, Pullamsetti SS, Schermuly R, Rosengarten B. Effects of anti-inflammatory vagus nerve stimulation on the cerebral microcirculation in endotoxinemic rats. J Neuroinflammation. 2012;9:183.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Koopman FA, Chavan SS, Miljko S, Grazio S, Sokolovic S, Schuurman PR, Mehta AD, Levine YA, Faltys M, Zitnik R, Tracey KJ, Tak PP. Vagus nerve stimulation inhibits cytokine production and attenuates disease severity in rheumatoid arthritis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113(29):8284–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Liu Y, Yang J, Bao J, Li X, Ye A, Zhang G, Liu H. Activation of the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway by nicotine ameliorates lipopolysaccharide-induced preeclampsia-like symptoms in pregnant rats. Placenta. 2017;49:23–32.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Diaz V, Lebras-Isabet MN, Denjean A. Effect of Nomeganitro-L-arginine methyl ester-induced intrauterine growth restriction on postnatal lung growth in rats. Pediatr Res. 2005;58(3):557–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Zhang Y, Li H, Wang M, Meng G, Wang Z, Deng J, Wang M, Zhang Q, Yang S, Jiang H. Vagus nerve stimulation attenuates acute skeletal muscle injury induced by ischemia-reperfusion in rats. Oxidative Med Cell Longev. 2019;2019:9208949.

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Judkins A, Johnson RL, Murray ST, Yellon SM, Wilson CG. Vagus nerve stimulation in pregnant rats and effects on inflammatory markers in the brainstem of neonates. Pediatr Res. 2018;83(2):514–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Wu LZ, Xiao XM. Evaluation of the effects of Uncaria rhynchophylla alkaloid extract on LPS-induced preeclampsia symptoms and inflammation in a pregnant rat model. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2019;52(6):e8273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Souza CO, Peraçoli MT, Weel IC, Bannwart CF, Romão M, Nakaira-Takahagi E, Medeiros LT, Silva MG, Peraçoli JC. Hepatoprotective and anti-inflammatory effects of silibinin on experimental preeclampsia induced by L-NAME in rats. Life Sci. 2012;91:159–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Kong W, Kang K, Gao Y, Liu H, Meng X, Cao Y, Yang S, Liu W, Zhang J, Yu K, Zhao M. GTS-21 protected against LPS-induced sepsis myocardial injury in mice through α7nAChR. Inflammation. 2018;41(3):1073–83.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Cotechini T, Graham CH. Aberrant maternal inflammation as a cause of pregnancy complications: a potential therapeutic target? Placenta. 2015;36(8):960–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Liu YL, Feng ZY, Tan JP, Zhu LQ, Zhang JP. Relationship between inflammatory indexes of amniotic fluid and pregnancy outcome of women with cervical incompetence. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2018;53(8):517–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Gad HI. The potential role of anti tumor necrosis factor-alpha antibodies on some renal functions and vasoregulatory factors in preeclamptic pregnant Wistar rats. Saudi Med J. 2013;34(5):490–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Wat JM, Hawrylyshyn K, Baczyk D, Greig IR, Kingdom JC. Effects of glycol-split low molecular weight heparin on placental, endothelial, and anti-inflammatory pathways relevant to preeclampsia. Biol Reprod. 2018;99(5):1082–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Zhang M, Han X, Bao J, Yang J, Shi SQ, Garfield RE, Liu H. Choline supplementation during pregnancy protects against gestational lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammatory responses. Reprod Sci. 2018;25(1):74–85.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Fantel AG, Nekahi N, Shepard TH, Cornel LM, Unis AS, Lemire RJ. The teratogenicity of N(omega)-nitro-L-ariginine methyl ester (L-NAME), a nitric oxide synthase inhibitor, in rats. Reprod Toxicol. 1997;11(5):709–17.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Attenello F, Amar AP, Liu C, Apuzzo ML. Theoretical basis of Vagus nerve stimulation. Prog Neurol Surg. 2015;29:20–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Koopman FA, van Maanen MA. Vervoordeldonk MJ Tak PP balancing the autonomic nervous system to reduce inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis. J Intern Med. 2017;282(1):64–75.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Annoni EM, Xie X, Lee SW, Libbus I, KenKnight BH, Osborn JW, Tolkacheva EG. Intermittent electrical stimulation ofthe right cervical vagus nerve in salt-sensitive hypertensiverats: effects on blood pressure, arrhythmias, and ventricular electrophysiology. Phys Rep. 2015;3(8):e12476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Calvillo L, Vanoli E, Andreoli E, Besana A, Omodeo E, Gnecchi M, Zerbi P, Vago G, Busca G, Schwartz PJ. Vagal stimulation, through its nicotinic action, limits infarct size and the inflammatory response to myocardial ischemia and reperfusion. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2011;58(5):500–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Li M, Zheng C, Sato T, Kawada T, Sugimachi M, Sunagawa K. Vagal nerve stimulation markedly improves long-term survival after chronic heart failure in rats. Circulation. 2004;109:120–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Buchholz B, Donato M, Perez V, Deutsch ACR, Höcht C, Del Mauro JS, Rodríguez M, Gelpi RJ. Changes in the loading conditions induced by vagal stimulation modify the myocardial infarct size through sympathetic-parasympathetic interactions. Pflugers Arch. 2015;4677(7):1509–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Tian M, Zhang Y, Liu Z, Sun G, Mor G, Liao A. The PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitory pathway is altered in pre-eclampsia and regulates T cell responses in pre-eclamptic rats. Sci Rep. 2016;6:27683.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Amaral TAS, Ognibene DT, Carvalho LCRM, Rocha APM, Costa CA, Moura RS, Resende AC. Differential responses of mesenteric arterial bed to vasoactive substances in L-NAME-induced preeclampsia: role of oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2018;40(2):126–35.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Lips KS, Bruggmann D, Pfeil U, Vollerthun R, Grando SA, Kummer W. Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in rat and human placenta. Placenta. 2005;26:735–46.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Lee JI, Burckart GJ. Nuclear factor kappa B: important transcription factor and therapeutic target. J Clin Pharmacol. 1998;38:981–93.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Vaughan JE, Walsh SW. Activation of NF-κB in placentas of women with preeclampsia. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2012;31:243–25.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Bannwart CF, Nakaira-Takahagi E, Golim MA, de Medeiros LT, Romão M, Weel IC, Peraçoli MT. Downregulation of nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kappaB) pathway by silibinin in human monocytes challenged with Paracoccidioides brasiliensis. Life Sci. 2010;86(23–24):880–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors thank Zhicheng Lu and Liang Zhao for their help with the animal experiments and Li Wang and Fangrong Chen for their help in the preparation of the manuscript. We would also like to thank Professor Jincai Wu (University of Fudan) for his advice.


This study was supported by Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China Hainan (819MS119). The funder had role the in the design and analysis of this article.

Author information




The study was conceived by LS and MZ, LMZ and RT carried out the experiment and analysed the data. LMZ wrote the first version of the paper. All authors contributed to revisions of the paper and approved of the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Lei Shi or Mei Zhong.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures were approved by the ethics committee of Hainan Medical University, China (ratification NO 2020–185) and we followed Guidelines of ethical standards for the care and use of laboratory animals.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zheng, L., Tang, R., Shi, L. et al. Vagus nerve stimulation ameliorates L-NAME-induced preeclampsia-like symptoms in rats through inhibition of the inflammatory response. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 21, 177 (2021).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Vagus nerve stimulation
  • Preeclampsia
  • Inflammation
  • α7nAChR
  • Cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway