Skip to main content

Burden of hepatitis E virus infection in pregnancy and maternofoetal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Background

There is still a dearth of knowledge on the burden of HEV infection in the global population of pregnant women. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the global burden of HEV infection in pregnancy.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Knowledge, and Global Index Medicus to identify articles published until January 26, 2020. We considered cross-sectional, case-control, and cohort studies reporting the immunoglobulins M HEV seroprevalence in asymptomatic and symptomatic (jaundice or elevated transaminases) pregnant women or investigating the association between HEV infection and maternofoetal outcomes. We used a random-effects model to pool studies. This review was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42018093820.

Results

For HEV prevalence estimates, we included 52 studies (11,663 pregnant women). The seroprevalence was 3.5% (95% confidence interval: 1.4–6.4) in asymptomatic women (most of whom from high endemic areas). The prevalence in symptomatic women was 49.6% (42.6–56.7) with data only from HEV high endemic countries. In the multivariable meta-regression model, the prevalence was higher in symptomatic women compared to asymptomatic (adjusted prevalence odds ratio [aPOR]: 1.76; 95%CI: 1.61–1.91) and decreased with increasing year of publication (by 10-year) (aPOR: 0.90; 95%CI: 0.84–0.96). The proportion of HEV vertical transmission was 36.9% (13.3–64.2). Risk of bias was low, moderate and high respectively in 12 (23%), 37 (70%), and 4 studies (7%) addressing HEV prevalence estimation. HEV infection was associated with maternal deaths (pooled OR 7.17; 3.32–15.47), low birth weight (OR: 3.23; 1.71–6.10), small for gestational age (OR: 3.63; 1.25–10.49), preterm < 32 weeks (OR: 4.18; 1.23–14.20), and preterm < 37 weeks (OR: 3.45; 2.32–5.13), stillbirth (OR: 2.61; 1.64–4.14), intrauterine deaths (OR: 3.07; 2.13–4.43), and not with miscarriage (OR: 1.74; 0.77–3.90). All studies which assessed the association between HEV infection and maternofoetal outcomes had a moderate risk of bias.

Conclusions

Findings from this study are suggestive of a high burden of HEV infection in pregnancy in high endemic countries, its association with poor maternofoetal outcomes, and a high rate of vertical transmission. This study supports the need for specific strategies to prevent exposure of pregnant women to HEV infection, especially in high endemic areas.

Peer Review reports

Background

In 2016, the World Health Organization (WHO) launched a global strategy to halt the transmission of viral hepatitis supporting that people living with viral hepatitis should have access to safe, affordable, and effective prevention, care and treatment services [1]. Specifically, the aims by 2030 are to reduce by 90% the number of new cases of hepatitis, to treat 80% of eligible people infected with viral hepatitis so as to reduce by 65% the number of hepatitis related deaths [1]. Globally, it was estimated that about 1.34 million deaths which occurred in 2015 were due to viral hepatitis, of whom 95% were attributable to hepatitis B and C chronic infections, and those remaining, to hepatitis A and E infections [1, 2]. For the specific case of hepatitis E infection, global estimates indicate that about 20 million new cases of hepatitis E virus (HEV) infections occur each year, 3.3 million of whom are symptomatic [3]. In 2015, WHO reported approximately 44,000 fatal cases of HEV, accounting for about 3.3% of all viral hepatitis related mortality [3].

HEV is a water- and food-borne infection that can potentially cause acute outbreaks in populations with poor sanitation [1, 3]. However, zoonotic and transfusion-related transmission have also been documented [4, 5]. To date, no specific treatment exists for HEV infection; as a consequence, its management relies mostly on supportive care [1, 3]. On the other hand, prevention is oriented towards reducing exposure by improved sanitation, safe food and drinking, and vaccination [1]. Compared to hepatitis B and C, HEV infection is more unlikely to result in chronic liver disease and progression to fulminant hepatitis though rare, is mostly driven by host-specific than virus-specific factors [6]. Nevertheless, fulminant hepatitis occurs more frequently during pregnancy [3].

Mechanisms for fulminant hepatitis during pregnancy include lower CD4/CD8 cells ratio and increased levels of steroid hormones [7], reduced progesterone receptor expression, higher interleukin and viral load [8, 9]. Consequently, pregnant women with HEV, particularly those in the second and third trimester, are at higher risk of poor maternofoetal outcomes as suggested by narrative reviews of observational studies [3, 9, 10]. However and to the very best of our knowledge, there remains a dearth of knowledge on the burden of HEV infection among pregnant women living in high endemic countries. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the prevalence of HEV in pregnancy as well as its association with maternofoetal outcomes.

Methods

This systematic review was registered in the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of systematic reviews, registration number CRD42018093820. We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to report this review [11].

Search strategy and selection criteria

We carried-out a comprehensive search on major electronic databases including MEDLINE (through PubMed), EMBASE, Web of Knowledge, and Global Index Medicus to identify relevant studies on HEV infection among pregnant women. The search strategy was adapted to suit each database as illustrated by the search on PubMed (Supplementary Table 1). We considered studies published until January 26, 2020, without any language or country restriction. To supplement the electronic search, references of all relevant studies were also screened for potential consideration.

Two review authors (AF and SK) independently screened titles and abstracts of aggregated citations retrieved from the electronic search, and full texts of potentially eligible articles were further assessed for inclusion. Disagreements were resolved through discussion and unreached consensus was resolved by a third author (JJB).

Cross-sectional, case-control, and cohort studies were considered for inclusion. We excluded letters, reviews, commentaries, editorials, and studies without primary data. We also excluded studies that included participants who had been selected based on presence of other viral hepatitis or HIV and the description of method was incomplete. In these considered studies, HEV infection had to be diagnosed by serum detection of immunoglobulins (Ig) the major outcomes of interest, comparing HEV positive and negative pregnant women, included maternal mortality, foetal immaturity (low birth weight, preterm birth, small for gestational age), and foetal non-survival (intrauterine death, miscarriage, stillbirth). To estimate the prevalence of HEV vertical transmission, we calculated the proportion of HEV infected new-borns (HEV positive with polymerase chain reaction technique on neonatal cord-blood or peripheral blood from the new-borns) among HEV infected mothers.

Data extraction and management

Using a pretested data extraction form, two review authors (JJB and AFM) independently extracted relevant information, including first author, publication year and period of participants’ recruitment, country, site, area, setting, timing of data collection, study design, sampling method, sample size, sample tested for HEV, number of participants with IgM of HEV in blood or stool, number of participants with maternofoetal complications and the WHO region. Additionally, for each country of study recruitment, we retrieved data on human development index (HDI) [12]. We defined two groups of pregnant women based on clinical presentation at HEV screening: symptomatic and asymptomatic pregnant women. Symptomatic women were those with signs suggestive of acute hepatitis including jaundice and/or elevated transaminases. When relevant data from included studies were not available, corresponding authors were contacted at least twice for clarification. For the methodological quality and risk of bias assessment of included studies, the tool to be used was determined by the outcome of interest which guided study inclusion. Accordingly, for studies presenting the prevalence of HEV, we used an adapted version of the tool developed by Hoy and colleagues (Supplementary Table 2) [13]; for those presenting the association between HEV infection and maternofoetal outcomes, we used an adapted version of the ROBINS-I tool (Supplementary Table 3) [14]. Two review authors (AFM and JJB) independently ran the assessment; discrepancies were arbitrated by a third review author (JRN). Inter-rater agreements between investigators for study inclusion and methodological quality assessment were assessed using the Cohen’s κ coefficient [15].

Data synthesis and analysis

We undertook data meta-analysis using the package ‘meta’ (version 4.9–2) of R (version 3.6.2, The R Foundation for Statistical Computing). For HEV seroprevalence estimates, we calculated unadjusted prevalence based on crude numerators and denominators provided by individual studies. Then, to minimise the effect of the size of study-specific estimates of prevalence on the overall estimate, we used the Freeman–Tukey double arc-sine transformation before pooling data with a random-effects meta-analysis [16]. We also performed sensitivity analyses to assess the robustness of our estimates when only studies with a low risk of bias were included. Symmetry of counter-enhanced funnel plots and the Egger test were used to assess reporting and publication bias [17]. Consideration of significant publication bias was at a threshold of a p-value < 0.10. To assess the association between HEV infection and maternofoetal outcomes, we used random-effects approach by the Der Simonian and Laird method, and reported pooled weighted results as odds ratios (OR) both with 95% confidence and 95% prediction intervals (CI and PI) [18]. A continuous correction of 0.5 was added to each cell frequency for studies with a zero cell count. Heterogeneity across studies was assessed by χ2 test, and reported as I2 statistics [19]. In the case of substantial heterogeneity (I2 > 50%) [20], we carried-out subgroup analysis to investigate sources of residual heterogeneity.

Univariable meta-regression analysis was performed to identify and quantify (R2) sources of heterogeneity including clinical presentation, year of publication, HDI, WHO regions, country HEV endemic profile, and sampling method. We planned to integrate clinical profile in the final multivariable meta-regression model that was chosen based on the lowest corrected Akaike’s information criterion (AICc). A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Strength of association were reported with (adjusted) prevalence odds ratios (aPOR) and corresponding 95% CIs.

Results

Study selection and characteristics

In total, we identified 597 records, of which 54 were finally included [8, 21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73] (Supplementary Fig. 1). Agreement between review authors for study selection based on title and abstract (κ = 0.89) and data extraction (κ = 0.78) were moderate to high. Among the 54 included studies performed in 22 countries, 51 had been conducted to estimate HEV prevalence (Supplementary Table 4) and 5 to investigate the association between HEV and maternofoetal outcomes (Supplementary Table 5). Risk of bias was low, moderate and high respectively in 12 (23%), 37 (70%), and 4 studies (7%) addressing HEV prevalence estimation; all studies which assessed the association between HEV infection and maternofoetal outcomes had a moderate risk of bias. Overall, 53 (98%) studies were cross-sectional and one (2%) was case control. In the countries where studies were done, 29 (54%) were in South-East Asia, 10 in Eastern Mediterranean (18%), 6 in Africa (11%), 4 (7%) in Europe, 3 (6%) in Western Pacific, and 2 (4%) in The Americas. Clinically, pregnant women were symptomatic in 29 studies (54%) (Supplementary Table 6). The prevalence of viral hepatitis A, viral hepatitis B, viral hepatitis C, and viral hepatitis D varied from 0 to 14.6% (n = 23 studies), from 0 to 31.3% (n = 27 studies), from 0 to 13.5% (n = 23 studies), and from 0 to 1.5% (n = 3 studies), respectively.

Global prevalence of HEV infection in pregnancy and vertical transmission

To estimate the prevalence of HEV, a total of 13,153 pregnant women were included in the meta-analysis. All data on symptomatic women were only from high HEV endemic countries. In asymptomatic women, 14 studies were from high endemic, 3 from endemic, and 4 from not endemic countries. The HEV infection prevalence was 49.6% (95%CI: 42.6–56.7) in symptomatic (Fig. 1) and 3.5% (95%CI: 1.4–6.4) in asymptomatic pregnant women (Fig. 2) with substantial heterogeneity; p <  0.0001 (Table 1). Funnel plots suggested no asymmetry (Supplementary Figs. 2 and 3) confirmed by the Egger test (Table 1).

Fig. 1
figure1

Forest plot of the meta-analysis of IgM seroprevalence of HEV infection among symptomatic pregnant women

Fig. 2
figure2

Forest plot of the meta-analysis of IgM seroprevalence of HEV infection among asymptomatic pregnant women

Table 1 Meta-analysis prevalence of hepatitis E virus infection in the global population of pregnant women

There was no difference in HEV prevalence considering HDI grouping for asymptomatic women (Table 1). There was no data on symptomatic women from high HDI countries (Table 1).

In the univariable meta-regression analysis, the HEV prevalence was associated with clinical presentation (R2: 76.1%), year of publication (R2; 9.8%), human development index (R2: 24.6%), WHO regions (65.3%), and HEV Endemic profile of countries (R2: 0.0%) (Table 2). In the final multivariable model, two variables were included: clinical profile and year of publication explaining 80.6% of the variance of HEV prevalence. The prevalence was higher in symptomatic women compared to asymptomatic (aPOR: 1.76; 95%CI: 1.61–1.91; p <  0.0001) and decreased with increasing year of publication (by 10-year) (aPOR: 0.90; 95%CI: 0.84–0.96; p = 0.003) (Table 2).

Table 2 Meta-regression analysis of HEV infection prevalence in global population of pregnant women

Three studies with a total of 155 women reported data on HEV vertical transmission. The pooled estimate of vertical transmission was 36.9% (95%CI 13.3–64.2) (Fig. 3). All three studies diagnosed HEV infection using neonatal cord-blood samples.

Fig. 3
figure3

Forest plot of the meta-analysis prevalence of vertical transmission

Maternofoetal outcomes in HEV infection

In total, 479 HEV positive and 490 HEV negative women from five studies were included to investigate the association between HEV infection and maternofoetal outcomes. HEV infection during pregnancy was associated with low birth weight (OR: 3.23; 95%CI: 1.71–6.10), small for gestational age (OR: 3.63; 95%CI: 1.25–10.49), preterm < 32 weeks (OR: 4.18; 95%CI: 1.23–14.20), and preterm < 37 weeks (OR: 3.45; 95%CI: 2.32–5.13) (Fig. 4). HEV infection during pregnancy was also associated with stillbirth (OR: 2.61; 95%CI: 1.64–4.14), intrauterine deaths (OR: 3.07; 95%CI: 2.13–4.43), but not with miscarriage (OR: 1.74; 95%CI: 0.77–3.90) (Fig. 5). HEV infection during pregnancy increased the likelihood of maternal deaths (pooled OR 7.17, 95%CI 3.32–15.47) (Fig. 5).

Fig. 4
figure4

Forest plot of the risk of foetal immaturity associated with HEV infection during pregnancy. a Low birth weight. b Small for gestational age. c Preterm < 32 weeks. d Preterm < 37 weeks

Fig. 5
figure5

Forest plot of the risk of foetal and maternal mortality associated with HEV infection during pregnancy. a Stillbirth. b Intrauterine deaths. c Miscarriage. d Maternal death

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first systematic review and meta-analysis which estimated the burden of HEV infection in pregnancy. Our main findings show a high burden of HEV infection in pregnant women, especially among symptomatic women. In addition, HEV in pregnancy was associated with a two- to three-fold increase in intrauterine foetal demise, a three-fold increase in poor intrauterine foetal maturity, and a significant increase in the likelihood of maternal death. What’s more, HEV prevalence decreased overtime among pregnant women.

Previous modelling studies through a Global Burden of Disease approach [74] estimated the HEV seroprevalence in the general population aged 15 to 45 (childbearing age for women) years to be between 5 and 22%. Our finding among pregnant women is concordant with those estimates. Available evidence shows that apart from non-infectious causes, hepatitis E is a significant cause of jaundice in pregnancy because pregnant women are more vulnerable to HEV infection than to other viral hepatitis (A, B, and C) [75]. The high IgM seroprevalence (almost 50%) of HEV infection in symptomatic women may be explained by the fact that all studies included in this analysis were from HEV endemic areas. We found that higher HEV infection prevalence was associated with low HDI, however without a significant difference. In fact, HEV infection is a disease of resource-limited settings with poor sanitation and hygiene services leading to water and food contaminations [3]. Indeed, HEV infection is known as a disease of financial, educational, and infrastructural poverty [3]. Although the current analyses pleaded for a decreasing trends of HEV prevalence overtime, specific attention to curb the burden of HEV infection is needed for high HEV endemic areas. However, this finding should be interpreted with caution since incidence data are better to estimate the dynamic of an infection, rather than prevalence data.

Narrative reviews suggested that HEV infection during pregnancy is a risk factor for poor maternal and foetal outcomes, in particular at a later stage of pregnancy [3, 9, 10]. Although the physiopathology of HEV infection in pregnancy and its outcomes is not yet clear enough, it is possible that there exists an interplay between hormonal (reduced oestrogen and progesterone receptor expression) and immunologic changes (maintenance of the antigenic foetus in the maternal environment by suppression of T cell mediated immunity) during pregnancy, alongside a HEV high viral load [8, 76]. Physiological changes in hormonal and immunologic interplay which should normally favour pregnancy evolution, become deleterious to both the foetus and the mother, affecting all stages of foetal growth and maturity. For foetal non-survival, only miscarriage was not associated with HEV infection. At the debut of the pregnancy, the interplay between changes during pregnancy and presence of HEV may not be sufficiently important to increase significantly the risk of miscarriage. During the first 20 weeks of pregnancy, the plasma concentration of cytokines begins to decrease [9]. This gradual decrease in the level of cytokines leads to a low concentration of the plasma levels of cytokines in late pregnancy, hence giving rise to a decrease in immunity. This is why HEV infection may be associated with a higher risk of poor foetal outcomes in late pregnancy [9].

We found that the odds of death during pregnancy increased by 7 times in the presence of HEV infection. During pregnancy, there is a high production of steroid hormones [8, 9]. These steroid hormones may promote viral replication. The interplay between immunological and hormonal factors and between the virus and the host leads to severe liver damage in pregnancy, increasing the risk for fulminant hepatic failure and subsequently, that for death.

To date, there is no definitive curative treatment for HEV infection; therefore, strategies for curbing its burden should be focussed on prevention. Actually, only one licensed hepatitis E vaccine is considered promising, which is licensed only in China [77]. There is no actual evidence to recommend the use of any hepatitis vaccine systematically through national programs including pregnant women [77]. The vaccine is recommended for people with a high risk of HEV infection and could therefore be used among pregnant women living in endemic areas or where HEV outbreaks are more likely to occur [3]. While waiting for further developments of hepatitis E vaccines, since HEV infection is a food-borne infection, health policy makers and stakeholders should focus on strategies to improve hygiene, sanitation, water supplies and food safety that can be integrated in a global development program. Indeed, HEV is a disease of poverty [3]. More research is needed to better understand how HEV impacts negatively the course of pregnancy. Research is also warranted to develop innovative community-based strategies to curb the burden of food-borne diseases including HEV infection and to develop antiviral treatments against acute HEV infection.

Nevertheless, findings from this study should be interpreted with caution. Actually, the review was limited by the scarcity of studies reporting some of the outcomes of interest. There were not enough studies to conduct meta-regression and sub-group analysis in order to identify modifiers of the association between HEV infection and poor pregnancy outcomes. In the estimation of the global prevalence, not all countries were represented from all WHO regions, which may limit the generalizability of current estimates. This also limited the investigation of sources of heterogeneity of HEV prevalence by WHO regions. It was difficult to assess all assays used and the prevalence of other viral hepatitis as sources of heterogeneity since they were inconsistently reported and not reported in most of original studies.

Notwithstanding, this first systematic review with meta-analyses summarised data on the prevalence of HEV infection in pregnant women and on the association between maternal and foetal outcomes in pregnancy. Another strength of this study relies in the absence of any publication bias. In addition, the between-studies heterogeneity was not significant when investigating association between HEV infection and pregnancy outcomes.

Conclusions

The present findings suggest a high burden of HEV infection in pregnancy in high endemic countries, its association with poor maternal and foetal outcomes, and a high rate of vertical transmission. As such, this study supports the need for specific strategies to prevent exposure of pregnant women to HEV infection, especially in resource-limited settings, areas where HEV outbreaks are more likely to occur, and in HEV high endemic areas. The widespread use of hepatitis E vaccine among pregnant women in these settings and areas should be explored. Moreover, further studies are needed to identify plausible causal pathways for a better description of the association between HEV infection and poor maternal and foetal outcomes.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

Abbreviations

HEV:

Hepatitis E

WHO:

World Health Organization

References

  1. 1.

    World Health Organization. Global Health sector strategy on viral hepatitis 2016-2021: Towards ending viral hepatitis. WHO: 2016. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/246177/WHO-HIV-2016.06-eng.pdf;jsessionid=8BBB114FF64FC1E901805FA54462BE1?sequence=1.

  2. 2.

    WHO: Global Hepatitis Report: Prevent, test and treat. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/255016/9789241565455-eng.pdf?sequence=1. Accessed on Jul 6, 2018.

  3. 3.

    WHO: Hepatitis E: Key facts. http://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/hepatitis-e. Accessed on June 9, 2018.

  4. 4.

    Dalton HR, Izopet J. Transmission and epidemiology of hepatitis E virus genotype 3 and 4 infections. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect Med. 2018;18(11):a032144. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29530946/.

  5. 5.

    Izopet J, Lhomme S, Chapuy-Regaud S, Mansuy JM, Kamar N, Abravanel F. HEV and transfusion-recipient risk. VHE Risque receveur. 2017;24(3):176–81.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Smith DB, Simmonds P. Hepatitis E virus and fulminant hepatitis--a virus or host-specific pathology? Liver Int. 2015;35(4):1334–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Jilani N, Das BC, Husain SA, Baweja UK, Chattopadhya D, Gupta RK, Sardana S, Kar P. Hepatitis E virus infection and fulminant hepatic failure during pregnancy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;22(5):676–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Borkakoti J, Hazam RK, Mohammad A, Kumar A, Kar P. Does high viral load of hepatitis E virus influence the severity and prognosis of acute liver failure during pregnancy? J Med Virol. 2013;85(4):620–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Navaneethan U, Al Mohajer M, Shata MT. Hepatitis E and pregnancy: understanding the pathogenesis. Liver Int. 2008;28(9):1190–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Chaudhry SA, Verma N, Koren G. Hepatitis E infection during pregnancy. Can Fam Phys Med Fam Can. 2015;61(7):607–8.

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ (Clin Res ed). 2009;339:b2700.

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    WHO: Waterborne outbreaks of Hepatitis E: Recognition, Investigation, and Control. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/129448/9789241507608_eng.pdf?sequence=1. Accessed on Jul 01, 2018.

  13. 13.

    Hoy D, Brooks P, Woolf A, Blyth F, March L, Bain C, Baker P, Smith E, Buchbinder R. Assessing risk of bias in prevalence studies: modification of an existing tool and evidence of interrater agreement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012;65(9):934–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Sterne JA, Hernan MA, Reeves BC, Savovic J, Berkman ND, Viswanathan M, Henry D, Altman DG, Ansari MT, Boutron I, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ (Clin Res). 2016;355:i4919.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Viera AJ, Garrett JM. Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med. 2005;37(5):360–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Barendregt JJ, Doi SA, Lee YY, Norman RE, Vos T. Meta-analysis of prevalence. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013;67(11):974–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ (Clin Res). 1997;315(7109):629–34.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials revisited. Contemp Clin Trials. 2015;45(Pt A):139–45.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21(11):1539–58.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Cochran WG. The combination of estimates from different experiments. Biometrics. 1954;10(1):101–29.

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Bhatnagar G, Sharma S, Kumar A, Prasad S, Agarwal S, Kar P. Reduced glutathione in hepatitis E infection and pregnancy outcome. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2016;42(7):789–95.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Devi SG, Kumar A, Kar P, Husain SA, Sharma S. Association of pregnancy outcome with cytokine gene polymorphisms in HEV infection during pregnancy. J Med Virol. 2014;86(8):1366–76.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Javed NA, Ullah SH, Hussain N, Sheikh MA, Khan A, Ghafoor F, Firdous R, Uddin W, Saqib AN, Muhyudin G. Hepatitis e virus seroprevalence in pregnant women in Pakistan: maternal and fetal outcomes. East Mediterr Health J. 2017;23(8):559–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Kumar A, Devi SG, Kar P, Agarwal S, Husain SA, Gupta RK, Sharma S. Association of cytokines in hepatitis E with pregnancy outcome. Cytokine. 2014;65(1):95–104.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Patra S, Kumar A, Trivedi SS, Puri M, Sarin SK. Maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnant women with acute hepatitis E virus infection. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147(1):28–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Abebe M, Ali I, Ayele S, Overbo J, Aseffa A, Mihret A. Seroprevalence and risk factors of Hepatitis E Virus infection among pregnant women in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. PLoS One. 2017;12(6).

  27. 27.

    Adjei AA, Tettey Y, Aviyase JT, Adu-Gyamfi C, Obed S, Mingle JA, Ayeh-Kumi PF, Adiku TK. Hepatitis e virus infection is highly prevalent among pregnant women in Accra, Ghana. Virol J. 2009;6.

  28. 28.

    Ahmed RE, Karsany MS, Adam I. Brief report: acute viral hepatitis and poor maternal and perinatal outcomes in pregnant Sudanese women. J Med Virol. 2008;80(10):1747–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Singla A, Mehta S, Rajaram S, Shree S. Materno-fetal outcomes with viral hepatitis in pregnancy. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2016;66(3):166–9.

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Banait VS, Sandur V, Parikh F, Murugesh M, Ranka P, Ramesh VS, Sasidharan M, Sattar A, Kamat S, Dalal A, et al. Outcome of acute liver failuredue to acute hepatitis E in pregnant women. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2007;26(1):6–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Beniwal M, Kumar A, Kar P, Jilani N, Sharma JB. Prevalence and severity of acute viral hepatitis and fulminant hepatitis during pregnancy: a prospective study from North India. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2003;21(3):184–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Bhatia V, Singhal A, Panda SK, Acharya SK. A 20-year single-center experience with acute liver failure during pregnancy: Is the prognosis really worse? Hepatology (Baltimore, Md). 2008;48(5):1577–85.

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Bista BK, Rana A. Acute hepatitis E in pregnancy--study of 16 cases. JNMA. 2006;45(161):182–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Brohi ZP, Sadaf A, Perveen U. Etiology, clinical features and outcome of fulminant hepatic failure in pregnancy. J Pak Med Assoc. 2013;63(9):1168–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Cordova CMMd, Blatt SL, Botelho TKR, Dalmarco EM: Sorologia Para o vírus da Hepatite E em gestantes: clinicamente importante ou desnecessário? Rev Bras Anal Clin 2007, 39(4):269–273.

  36. 36.

    Cevrioglu AS, Altindis M, Tanir HM, Aksoy F. Investigation of the incidence of hepatitis E virus among pregnant women in Turkey. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2004;30(1):48–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Changede P, Chavan N, Raj N, Gupta P. An observational study to evaluate the maternal and Foetal outcomes in pregnancies complicated with jaundice. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2018:1–6.

  38. 38.

    Cong W, Sui JC, Zhang XY, Qian AD, Chen J, Zhu XQ. Seroprevalence of hepatitis E virus among pregnant women and control subjects in China. J Med Virol. 2015;87(3):446–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    De Paschale M, Ceriani C, Romanò L, Cerulli T, Cagnin D, Cavallari S, Ndayake J, Zaongo D, Diombo K, Priuli G, et al. Epidemiology of hepatitis E virus infection during pregnancy in Benin. Trop Med Int Health. 2016;21(1):108–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Elduma AH, Osman WM. Dengue and hepatitis E virus infection in pregnant women in eastern Sudan, a challenge for diagnosis in an endemic area. Pan African Med J. 2014;19.

  41. 41.

    Farshadpour F, Taherkhani R, Ravanbod MR, Eghbali SS, Taherkhani S, Mahdavi E. Prevalence, risk factors and molecular evaluation of hepatitis E virus infection among pregnant women resident in the northern shores of Persian Gulf, Iran. PLoS One. 2018;13(1).

  42. 42.

    Hamid SS, Jafri SMW, Khan H, Shah H, Abbas Z, Fields H. Fulminant hepatic failure in pregnant women: acute fatty liver or acute vital hepatitis? J Hepatol. 1996;25(1):20–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Hannachi N, Hidar S, Harrabi I, Mhalla S, Marzouk M, Ghzel H, Ghannem H, Khairi H, Boukadida J. Seroprevalence and risk factors of hepatitis E among pregnant women in Central Tunisia. Pathol Biol. 2011;59(5):e115–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Huang F, Ma T, Li L, Zeng W, Jing S. Low seroprevalence of hepatitis E virus infection in pregnant women in Yunnan, China. Braz J Infect Dis. 2013;17(6):716–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Huang F, Wang J, Yang C, Long F, Li Y, Li L, Jing S, Wang H. Chinese pregnant women in their third trimester are more susceptible to HEV infection. Braz J Infect Dis. 2015;19(6):672–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Jaiswal SPB, Jain AK, Naik G, Soni N, Chitnis DS. Viral hepatitis during pregnancy. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2001;72(2):103–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Jilani N, Das BC, Husain SA, Baweja UK, Chattopadhya D, Gupta RK, Sardana S, Kar P. Hepatitis E virus infection and fulminant hepatic failure during pregnancy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol (Australia). 2007;22(5):676–82.

    Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Junaid SA, Agina SE, Abubakar KA. Epidemiology and associated risk factors of hepatitis E virus infection in plateau state, Nigeria. Virology. 2014;5:15–26.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Kar P, Jilani N, Husain SA, Pasha ST, Anand R, Rai A, Das BC. Does hepatitis E viral load and genotypes influence the final outcome of acute liver failure during pregnancy? Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103(10):2495–501.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Khuroo MS, Kamili S. Aetiology, clinical course and outcome of sporadic acute viral hepatitis in pregnancy. J Viral Hepat. 2003;10(1):61–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Khuroo MS, Kamili S. Aetiology and prognostic factors in acute liver failure in India. J Viral Hepat. 2003;10(3):224–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Kumar A, Sharma S, Kar P, Agarwal S, Ramji S, Husain SA, Prasad S, Sharma S. Impact of maternal nutrition in hepatitis E infection in pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;296(5):885–95.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Kumar S, Pujhari SK, Chawla YK, Chakraborti A, Ratho RK. Molecular detection and sequence analysis of hepatitis E virus in patients with viral hepatitis from North India. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011;71(2):110–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Kumar RM, Uduman S, Rana S, Kochiyil JK, Usmani A, Thomas L. Sero-prevalence and mother-to-infant transmission of hepatitis E virus among pregnant women in the United Arab Emirates. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2001;100(1):9–15.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Kumar N, Das V, Agarwal A, Pandey A, Agrawal S. Fetomaternal outcomes in pregnant women with hepatitis e infection; still an important fetomaternal killer with an unresolved mystery of increased virulence in pregnancy. Turk Jinekoloji Obstet Dernegi Dergisi. 2017;14(2):106–13.

    Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Kumar S, Ratho RK, Chawla YK, Chakraborti A. The incidence of sporadic viral hepatitis in North India: a preliminary study. Hepatobil Pancreatic Dis Int. 2007;6(6):596–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Kumar A, Beniwal M, Kar P, Sharma JB, Murthy NS. Hepatitis E in pregnancy. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2004;85(3):240–4.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Lindemann MLM, Gabilondo G, Romero B, De La Maza OMS, Pérez-Gracia MT. Low prevalence of hepatitis E infection among pregnant women in Madrid, Spain. J Med Virol. 2010;82(10):1666–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Mahtab MA, Rahman S, Khan M, Mamum AA, Afroz S. Etiology of fulminant hepatic failure: experience from a tertiary hospital in Bangladesh. Hepatobil Pancreatic Dis Int. 2008;7(2):161–4.

    Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Neffatti H, Lebraud P, Hottelet C, Gharbi J, Challouf T, Roque-Afonso AM. Southern Tunisia: A still high endemicity area for hepatitis A. PLoS One. 2017;12(4).

  61. 61.

    Obiri-Yeboah D, Awuku YA, Adu J, Pappoe F, Obboh E, Nsiah P, Amoako-Sakyi D, Simpore J. Sero-prevalence and risk factors for hepatitis E virus infection among pregnant women in the Cape Coast Metropolis, Ghana. PLoS One. 2018;13(1).

  62. 62.

    Pujol FH, Favorov MO, Marcano T, Este JA, Magris M, Liprandi F, Khudyakov YE, Khudyakova NS, Fields HA. Prevalence of antibodies against hepatitis E virus among urban and rural populations in Venezuela. J Med Virol. 1994;42(3):234–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Rathi U, Bapat M, Rathi P, Abraham P. Effect of liver disease on maternal and fetal outcome a prospective study. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2007;26(2):59–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Renou C, Gobert V, Locher C, Moumen A, Timbely O, Savary J, Roque-Afonso AM. Prospective study of Hepatitis e Virus infection among pregnant women in France. Virol J. 2014;11(1).

  65. 65.

    Sahai S, Mishra V, Ganga D, Jatav OP. Viral hepatitis in pregnancy--a study of its effect on maternal and Foetal outcome. J Assoc Physicians India. 2015;63(1):28–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Salam GD, Kumar A, Kar P, Aggarwal S, Husain A, Sharma S. Serum tumor necrosis factor-alpha level in hepatitis E virus-related acute viral hepatitis and fulminant hepatic failure in pregnant women. Hepatol Res. 2013;43(8):826–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Singh S, Mohanty A, Joshi YK, Deka D, Mohanty S, Panda SK. Mother-to-child transmission of hepatitis E virus infection. Indian J Pediatr. 2003;70(1):37–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Solanke D, Rathi C, Pandey V, Patil M, Phadke A, Sawant P. Etiology, clinical profile, and outcome of liver disease in pregnancy with predictors of maternal mortality: a prospective study from Western India. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2016;35(6):450–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Strand RT, Franque-Ranque M, Bergström S, Weiland O. Infectious aetiology of jaundice among pregnant women in Angola. Scand J Infect Dis. 2003;35(6–7):401–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Sultana R, Humayun S. Fetomaternal outcome in acute hepatitis E. J Coll Phys Surg Pak. 2014;24(2):127–30.

    Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Surya IGP, Kornia K, Suwardewa TGA, Mulyanto, Tsuda F, Mishiro S. Serological markers of hepatitis B, C, and E viruses and human immunodeficiency virus type-1 infections in pregnant women in Bali, Indonesia. J Med Virol. 2005;75(4):499–503.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Modiyinji AF, Amougou-Atsama M, Monamele CG, Nola M, Njouom R. Seroprevalence of hepatitis E virus antibodies in different human populations of Cameroon. J Med Virol. 2019;91(11):1989–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Tejada-Strop A, Tohme RA, Andre-Alboth J, Childs L, Ji X, Landgraf DO, De Castro V, Boncy J, Kamili S. Seroprevalence of hepatitis a and hepatitis e viruses among pregnant women in Haiti. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2019;101(1):230–2.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Rein DB, Stevens GA, Theaker J, Wittenborn JS, Wiersma ST. The global burden of hepatitis E virus genotypes 1 and 2 in. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md) 2012. 2005;55(4):988–97.

    Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Lata I. Hepatobiliary diseases during pregnancy and their management: an update. Int J Crit Illness Inj Sci. 2013;3(3):175–82.

    Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Fiore S, Savasi V. Treatment of viral hepatitis in pregnancy. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2009;10(17):2801–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    WHO: Hepatitis E vaccine: WHO position paper, May 2015. http://www.who.int/wer/2015/wer9018.pdf?ua=1. Accessed 14 July 2018.

Download references

Acknowledgments

None.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific funding from a public, commercial or not-for-profit funding agency.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conception and design of the protocol: JJB, MAA, AFM, SK, JRN, ET, RN. Conception of the literature search: JJB. Selection of studies: AFM, SK, JJB. Full texts searching: AFM, JJB. Data extraction: AFM, JJB, JRN. Data synthesis and analysis: AFM, JJB, JRN, ET. Data interpretation: JJB, JRN, ET. Manuscript drafting: JJB, ET. Manuscript revision: JJB, AFM, JRN, MAA, SK, MN, ET, RN. Manuscript approval: MAA, JJB, AFM, SK, JRN, MN, ET, RN. Guarantor of the review: RN. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean Joel Bigna.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Search strategy in PubMed. Table S2. Risk of bias tool. Table S3. Risk of bias on study investigating the association between HEV infection and maternofetal outcomes. Table S4. Individual characteristics of studies included in the meta-analysis prevalence of HEV infection in the global population of pregnant women. Table S5. Individual characteristics of studies included in the meta-analysis of pregnancy outcomes in HEV infection in the global population of pregnant women. Table S6. Characteristics of studies included in the meta-analysis. Figure S1. The review process. Figure S2. Funnel plot for HEV prevalence in asymptomatic pregnant women. Figure S3. Funnel plot for HEV prevalence in symptomatic pregnant women.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bigna, J.J., Modiyinji, A.F., Nansseu, J.R. et al. Burden of hepatitis E virus infection in pregnancy and maternofoetal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 20, 426 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03116-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Hepatitis E
  • Pregnancy
  • Women health
  • Vertical transmission
  • Maternal deaths
  • Intrauterine deaths
  • Miscarriage
  • Low birth weight
  • Preterm
  • Small for gestational age