Skip to main content

Association between pre-pregnancy calcium intake and hypertensive disorders during the first pregnancy: the Japan environment and children’s study

Abstract

Background

Determining the appropriate preconception care to reduce the occurrence of hypertensive disorder of pregnancy (HDP) remains a challenge in modern obstetrics. This study aimed to examine the association between pre-pregnancy calcium (Ca) intake and HDP in normotensive primiparas.

Methods

We used data from the Japan Environment Children’s study (JECS), which is the largest birth cohort study. A total of 33,894 normotensive Japanese primiparas were recruited for JECS between January 2011 and March 2014. Participants were categorized into five groups according to pre-pregnancy Ca intake quintiles (Q1 and Q5 were the lowest and highest Ca intake groups, respectively) to compare their basic background and obstetrics outcome. Multiple logistic regressions were performed to identify the effect of pre-pregnancy Ca intake on HDP, early onset HDP, and late-onset HDP, using Ca intake thresholds of 500, 550, 650, 700, 1000, 1500, and 1500 mg.

Results

We found significant differences in maternal background among the Ca intake groups; in particular, there were more participants with low socioeconomic status, indicated by low education level and low household income, and smokers in the lowest Ca intake group. Multiple logistic regression did not show any significant difference with regard to HDP, early onset HDP, and late-onset HDP in each Ca intake threshold.

Conclusions

Despite considerable recommendations concerning Ca intake for women of reproductive age, the present study indicates that pre-pregnancy Ca intake was not associated with an increased risk of new-onset hypertension among primiparas during pregnancy. Further studies examining the effect of other pre-pregnancy dietary factors on obstetric outcomes should be considered in the formulation of earlier preventive strategies for primiparas.

Peer Review reports

Background

Hypertensive disorder of pregnancy (HDP) occurs in approximately 2.5% of all pregnancies in Japan [1]. This disorder is the direct cause in approximately 30,000 maternal deaths per year and accounts for 14% of maternal deaths worldwide [2, 3]. Pre-eclampsia (PE) and gestational hypertension (GH) are the main forms of HDP, conventionally defined as the new onset of hypertension after 20 weeks of gestation, with (PE) or without (GH) signs of organ dysfunction, including kidney, liver, and placenta. Because hypertension during pregnancy affects the long-term health of both the mother and offspring, a major challenge in modern obstetrics is to identify preventive strategies prior to pregnancy [4].

Calcium (Ca) is involved in many body functions [5]. Several reference values of daily Ca intake for reproductive age, which vary from 550 mg to 1300 mg, have been established [6,7,8]. Although studies have focused on the effect of Ca intake on bone health, few effects of Ca intake or supplements on other health outcomes have been have investigated. Blood pressure is regulated by intracellular calcium in vascular smooth muscle cell via vasoconstriction and variations of the vascular volume [9, 10]. Therefore, appropriate Ca intake for women who hope to conceive is essential not only for preventing future osteoporosis, which may be reduced by the combination of Ca with the appropriate 25-hydroxyvitamin D intake, but also for reducing the risk of HDP. Dietary factors have been suggested to play a role in the prevention of HDP, including GH and PE, and pre-pregnancy Ca intake is thought to an important factor to reduce the risk of HDP. In 1960, an epidemiological study reported a low prevalence of PE in Ethiopia, where the local diet contained a high amount of Ca [11]. Although several studies have examined the association between Ca intake and prevention of HDP, varying results have been reported, especially in the dose of Ca supplement. Some clinical studies have reported that a high dose of Ca supplementation (> 1.5 g/day) could prevent PE [12], while a systematic review reported that a low dose of Ca (< 1 g/day) may be sufficient (relative risk 0.38, 95% confidential interval (CI) 0.28–0.52) [13]. This evidence was used as the basis for the World Health Organization (WHO) recommendation for routine prenatal Ca supplementation of 1500–2000 mg daily beginning from the 20th gestational week for all pregnant women, particularly those residing in low-Ca intake areas whose populations are considered at a high risk [14].

Although enough evidence has shown a reduced risk of pregnancy-related hypertension by Ca supplementation during pregnancy, potential questions still remain whether pre-pregnancy Ca intake or low dose Ca supplementation will affect the risk of new-onset pregnancy-related hypertension disorder using a homogeneous large sample size.

Therefore, we aimed to examine whether pre-pregnancy maternal intake of Ca is associated with the occurrence of new-onset HDP, including PE and HDP among nullipara Japanese women, using data from a large cohort study.

Methods

In this study, data from the Japan Environmental Children’s Study (JECS), a government-funded birth cohort study started in January 2011, were used. This survey investigated the effect of several environmental factors on children’s health [15]. Eligibility requirements of JECS participants (mothers) were as follows: (1) living in the study area at the time of application and were expected to live in Japan in the near future; (2) expected delivery date between August 1, 2011, and mid-2014; and (3) could participate without difficulty (i.e., they could answer the self-management questionnaire). Written informed consent was obtained from all participating women.

The JECS protocol was reviewed and approved by the Ministry of the Environment’s Institutional Review Board on Epidemiological Studies and by the Ethics Committees of all participating institutions. The JECS was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration and other nationally valid regulations and guidelines.

Data collection

We used the dataset released in June 2016 (dataset: jecs-ag-20,160,424) for this study. This data set consisted of three types of information: (a) self-reported questionnaire obtained around the first trimester, including the maternal basic information, or food frequency questionnaires (FFQs); (b) self-reported questionnaire collected during their second/third trimester, including socioeconomic status such as maternal education or household income; and (c) obstetrics outcome and maternal medical background which was retrieved from the medical records of each subject’s institution.

In this study, we excluded cases with insufficient data, multiple pregnancies, multiparity, and hypertension before pregnancy.

Determination of pre-pregnancy Ca intake, obstetric outcomes, and confounding factors

Ca intake before conception was determined using the FFQ, which was completed during the first trimester. Participants were asked how often they consumed various types of food from 1 year before pregnancy to their first trimester, which was taken to indicate dietary patterns during the preconception period. A standard portion size was specified for each item of the FFQ. Response options for the intake frequency ranged from almost never to ≥ 7 times/day for foods such as cheese, yogurt, and tofu and ranged from almost never to ≥ 10 glasses/day for beverages such as milk and fermented milk drinks. The intake frequencies then were multiplied by the specified portion size. Nutrient content of each food was obtained from the Japanese food consumption table 5th revised revision [16], and the daily intake of Ca was estimated by summing the contents from all the food items after multiplying by the frequency of consumption. This FFQ has been validated using 12-day weighed food records in adults aged 40–74 years [17]. This study considered only dietary Ca intake and did not include Ca supplementation.

Obstetric data included information with regard to HDP, gestational age at birth, and birth weight. HDP was defined as a new onset of hypertension (≥ 140/90 mmHg) after pregnancy. HDP was further classified into two categories: early onset (Eo) HDP (HDP occurred before 34 weeks) and late-onset (Lo) HDP (HDP occurred after 34 weeks). Preterm birth (PTB) was defined as delivery before 37 gestational weeks. Low birth weight (LBW) was defined as birth weight < 2500 g. The following items were used as confounding factors: advanced maternal age (AMA), pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI), conception methods, maternal smoking status, maternal educational status, and annual household income. AMA at delivery was defined as maternal age ≥ 35 years. Participants were categorized into three BMI groups as follows: <18.5, 18.5–25.0, and ≥ 25.0 kg/m2 [1]. Conception methods were categorized into natural pregnancy or conception after some infertility treatment. Maternal participants were requested to provide information about their smoking status as follows: “never smoked,” “quit smoking before pregnancy,” “quit smoking during early pregnancy,” and “kept smoking during pregnancy.” “Kept smoking during pregnancy” was defined as the smoking category; otherwise, it was defined as non-smoking. Maternal education was categorized into four groups (junior high school, < 10; high school, 10–12; professional school or university, 13–16; and graduate school, ≥ 17 years). Annual household income was categorized into four levels (< 2,000,000; 2,000,000–5,999,999; 6,000,000–9,999,999; and ≥ 10,000,000 JPY) [1]. The inclusion criteria of confounding factors for this study were determined by clinical importance [18,19,20,21].

Statistical analyses

First, participants were categorized according to quartile (Q1 as the lowest Ca intake group and Q5 as the highest Ca intake group) based on their daily Ca intake before pregnancy. Maternal characteristics and obstetric outcomes were summarized according to each group. Kruskal-Wallis (or One-way analysis of variance) test and chi-square tests were used to compare continuous and categorical variables, respectively. The cut off values for Ca intake (mg/day) for HDP were 500, 550, 650, 700, 1000, 1500, and 2000. Although some of these values have been established by WHO and others to account for health maintenance such as Ca needs for growth, development, and functioning, the thresholds were defined before the analysis based on literature [6, 8, 14]. For each Ca intake threshold, adjusted odds ratios and 95% CI for HDP, Eo-HDP, and Lo-HDP were calculated using a multiple logistic regression model, accounting for maternal age, conception method, pre-pregnancy BMI, maternal education, maternal smoking status, and household income. We accomplished this by using dummy variables for categorical variables composed of more than three categories. SPSS version 26 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) was used for the statistical analyses. A p value < 0.05 indicated statistical significance.

Results

In the JECS dataset, the total number of fetal records from infants delivered between 2011 and 2014 was 104,102. Of these, 1,994 infants from multiple gestations, 1,222 participants with maternal chronic hypertension, 15,727 participants with insufficient data, 51,263 multiparous participants, and two cases with unknown pre-pregnancy Ca intake were excluded. After applying our inclusion criteria, 33,894 participants were eligible for this study and categorized into five groups according to quintile (Fig. 1). The median (inter-quartile) pre-pregnancy Ca intake for participants was 430 (294–612) mg/day.

Fig. 1
figure1

Study flow

Maternal medical and socioeconomic background and obstetric outcomes

Table 1 summarizes the maternal medical background and obstetric outcomes according to the quartile of pre-pregnancy Ca intake. The median (inter-quartile) pre-pregnancy Ca intake (mg/day) of each group from Q1 to Q5 was 199 (154–235), 321 (295–347), 430 (401–460), 567 (529–613), and 899 (755–1253) mg/day, respectively.

Table 1 Maternal medical background and obstetric outcomes per dietary Ca intake quintiles

The mean maternal age was significantly different among the five groups (p < 0.001) and the highest in the Q5 group. The ratio of AMA and sterility treatment increased along with each category (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). The rate of smoking, BMI > 25 kg/m2, maternal education < 10 years, and household income < 2.000.000 JPY, the lowest household income category, were significantly different among the five groups. All of these were the highest in Q1 group.

With regard to obstetric outcome, no significant differences were found in the occurrence of HDP (p = 0.719), Eo-HDP (p = 0.739), and Lo-HDP (p = 0.655).

Pre-pregnancy Ca intake and risk of HDP

Table 2 summarizes the association between Ca intake and HDP, Eo-HDP, and Lo-HDP. The percentage of participants who had a dietary Ca intake greater than 500 mg/day, 550 mg/day, 650 mg/day, 700 mg/day, 1000 mg/day, 1500 mg/day, and 2000 mg/day were 38.9%, 32.1%, 21.6%, 18.0%, 7.9%, 3.3% and 2.0%, respectively. Pre-pregnancy calcium intake did not reduce the risk of HDP, Eo-HDP, and Lo-HDP at any threshold value.

Table 2 Relationship between Ca intake and hypertensive disorder of pregnancy

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study using a large prospective birth cohort in Japan to examine the effect of pre-pregnancy dietary Ca intake on the occurrence of new-onset hypertension during pregnancy among normotensive primiparas. Using data from the largest Japanese birth cohort study to date, normotensive primiparas were classified into five groups based on their daily dietary Ca intake from 1 year before pregnancy to their first trimester, because we expected to find associations between Ca intake and maternal background. Consequently, we found significant differences in maternal background among the Ca intake groups; in particular, there were more participants with low socioeconomic status (i.e., low education level and low household income) and current smoking status in the lowest Ca intake group. Recommendations for Ca intake in women of reproductive age have a wide range of values; however, in our analysis, when pre-pregnancy dietary Ca intake thresholds were set between 500 and 2000 mg/day, none of these threshold values showed a clear cutoff value to reduce the risk of HDP.

Compared with most previous studies, we targeted primiparas and focused on pre-pregnancy Ca intake, because of the limited evidence on the prevention of new-onset hypertension during pregnancy for this population. It is thought that subsequent pregnancies reduce the occurrence of PE because of higher implantation or placentation [22] and enhanced maternal cardiovascular adaptation [23,24,25] by increased end-diastolic blood volume, stroke volume, and decreased vascular resistance [24], resulting in decreased mean arterial pressure and reduced arterial stiffness [25]. Therefore, recurrent pregnancy itself has HDP preventive effects. Furthermore, women with a history of HDP are carefully managed and may be treated by low-dose aspirin, which has been well-established to prevent recurrent HDP [26]. In developed countries, the proportion of primiparas among the total number of deliveries is increasing [27], which may subsequently increase the number of women who have received insufficient prevention advice or treatment against new-onset hypertension. Therefore, one major challenge in modern obstetrics is formulating prevention strategies for HDP in primiparas. Another challenge is preconception care. Recently, interest in preconception health such as advantageous exercise, improved dietary habits, and smoking cessation is growing, as it is a crucial period for influencing not only pregnancy outcomes, but also future maternal and child health and prevention of chronic disorders. Women with a history of either GH or PE have a higher risk for diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular-related mortality and morbidity, including ischemic heart disease, stroke, and venous thromboembolism [28, 29]. With the viewpoint of preventing long-term sequelae, Berks et al. reported that lifestyle interventions for exercise, dietary habits, and smoking cessation decrease cardiovascular risk, with an odds ratio of 0.91 (95% CI 0.87–0.96) among women with a history of PE [30].

Although the pathogenesis of HDP has not been elucidated, several mechanisms for the biological effect of Ca intake during pregnancy on the risk of PE may exist. Low Ca intake increases calcitriol serum levels, stimulates parathyroid function, and renin secretion. The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone signaling pathway produces sodium and water resorption, resulting in increased vascular volume. Calcitriol may increase cytosolic free Ca concentration. The parathyroid gland secretes parathyroid hormone and the parathyroid factor. Both mediators increase cytosolic free Ca concentration, leading to the contraction of vascular smooth muscle tissue [31]. Therefore, Ca intake may affect smooth muscle function on utero-placental flow. Carroli et al. reported a trend toward lower pulsatility index and resistance index in uterine and umbilical arteries at every gestational stage among women who received Ca supplementation compared with women who received placebo [32].

The strength of this study is that it is the first large-scale study conducted in Japan with meticulous attention to data collection, including a large number of primiparas. This study is considered representative of the general pregnant population in Japan [33]. Although the present results were not derived from a randomized controlled study, the large-scale nature of this cohort study has advantages, allowing for evaluation of associations between obstetric outcomes and pre-pregnancy exposures.

Nevertheless, this study has several limitations. First, although we accounted for some confounding factors in large portions of the questionnaire, we did not consider daily Vitamin D intake. Vitamin D is a steroid hormone that can be synthesized in the skin under the influence of UV light or found in foods, such as fish and vegetables. Vitamin D deficiency stimulates the secretion of parathyroid hormone which, in turn, affects Ca concentration. Second, although obstetric outcomes were based on medical records, this study focused on HDP, which does not differentiate GH from PE. As PE is accompanied by proteinuria or other organ dysfunction, the complications of PE more severely affect the mother and infant than do those of GH [34]. Furthermore, we did not have information about the severity of HDP such as BP variations, urine protein determination, and organ dysfunction, which affect both short- and long-term maternal health conditions. Third, the FFQ, which was taken in the first trimester, includes information 1 year before from the pregnancy; therefore, recall bias may exist. Fourth, we did not evaluate of plasma Ca concentrations before pregnancy, which may be associated with Ca intake. Finally, we did not assess Ca intake during pregnancy, which may affect the occurrence of HDP.

Conclusions

In conclusion, despite considerable recommendations concerning Ca intake for women of reproductive age, from the viewpoints of bone health and whether Ca intake during pregnancy could reduce the risk of new-onset HDP, we found no association between any pre-pregnancy Ca intake threshold and new-onset hypertension among primiparas during pregnancy. Because primiparas are vulnerable to new-onset HDP and daily diet could affect obstetric outcome, further studies that examine the effect of other pre-pregnancy dietary factors on obstetric outcomes should be considered in formulating earlier preventive strategies for primiparas.

Abbreviations

AMA:

Advanced maternal age

BMI:

Body mass index

Ca:

Calcium

CI:

Confidence interval

Eo:

Early onset

FFQs:

Food frequency questionnaires

GH:

Gestational hypertension

HDP:

Hypertensive disorder of pregnancy

JECS:

Japan Environment and Children’s Study

Lo:

Late-onset

PE:

Pre-eclampsia

RR:

Relative risk

WHO:

World Health Organization

References

  1. 1.

    Kyozuka H, Fujimori K, Hosoya M, Yasumura S, Yokoyama T, Sato A, et al. The Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS) in Fukushima Prefecture: Pregnancy outcome after the great East Japan earthquake. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2018;246:27–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Kassebaum NJ, Bertozzi-Villa A, Coggeshall MS, Shackelford KA, Steiner C, Heuton KR, et al. Global, regional, and national levels and causes of maternal mortality during 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2014;384:980–1004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Say L, Chou D, Gemmill A, Tunçalp Ö, Moller AB, Daniels J, et al. Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2014;2:e322-33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Schoenaker DA, Soedamah-Muthu SS, Mishra GD. The association between dietary factors and gestational hypertension and pre-eclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. BMC Med. 2014;12:157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    WHO World Health Organization. Vitamin and Mineral Requirements in Human Nutrition. 2nd ed. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2004.

  6. 6.

    Japan Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Japanese Dietary Standards. (2015) Summary. Available from: https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/0000061795.html. Accessed 3 Nov 2019.

  7. 7.

    Heaney RP. Absorbability and utility of calcium in mineral waters. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;84:371–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    EFSA Panel on Dietetic. Products, Nutrition, and Allergies (NDA). Scientific opinion on principals for deriving and applying dietary reference value. EFSA J. 2010;8:1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Fardella C, Rodriguez-Portales JA. Intracellular calcium and blood pressure: comparison between primary hyperparathyroidism and essential hypertension. J Endocrinol Invest. 1995;18:827–32.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Yim HE, Yoo KH. Renin-Angiotensin system - considerations for hypertension and kidney. Electrolyte Blood Press. 2008;6:42–50.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Hamlin RH. Prevention of pre-eclampsia. Lancet. 1962;1:864–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Kumar A, Devi SG, Batra S, Singh C, Shukla DK. Calcium supplementation for the prevention of pre-eclampsia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009;104:32–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Hofmeyr GJ, Manyame S. Calcium supplementation commencing before or early in pregnancy, or food fortification with calcium, for preventing hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;9:CD011192.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    WHO. WHO recommendations for prevention and treatment of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia. Geneva: WHO press; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Kawamoto T, Nitta H, Murata T, Toda E, Tsukamoto N, Hasegawa M, et al. Rationale and study design of the Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS). BMC Public Health. 2014;14:25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Science and Technology Agency. Standard table of food composition in Japan. The fifth revised edition. Tokyo: Printing Bureau. Ministry of Finance; 2000. (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Yokoyama Y, Takachi R, Ishihara J, Ishii Y, Sasazuki S, Sawada N, et al. Validity of short and long self-administered food frequency questionnaires in ranking dietary intake in middle-aged and elderly Japanese in the Japan Public Health Center-Based Prospective Study for the next generation (JPHC-NEXT) protocol area. J Epidemiol. 2016;26:420–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Sibai BM. Treatment of hypertension in pregnant women. N Eng J Med. 1996;335:257–65.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    ACOG Practice bulletin no. 202: gestational hypertension and preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133:e1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Bainbridge SA, Slide EH, Smith GN. Direct placental effects of cigarette smoke protect women from pre-eclampsia: the specific roles of carbon monoxide and antioxidant systems in the placenta. Med Hypotheses. 2005;64:17–27.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Xue T, Zhu T, Lin W, Talbott EO. Association between hypertensive disorders in pregnancy and particulate matter in the contiguous United States, 1999–2004. Hypertension. 2018;72:77–84.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Borsens I, Pijnenborg R, Vercruysse L, Romero R. The “Great Obstetrical Syndromes” are associated with disorders of deep placentation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204:193–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Ghossein-Doha C, Spaanderman ME, Al Doulah R, Van Kuijk SM, Peeters LL. Maternal cardiac adaptation to subsequent pregnancy in formerly pre-eclamptic women according to recurrence of pre-eclampsia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;47:96–103.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Clapp JF 3rd, Capeless E. Cardiovascular function before, during, and after the first and subsequent pregnancies. Am J Cardiol. 1997;80:1469–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Morris EA, Hale SA, Badger GJ, Magness RR, Bernstein IM. Pregnancy induces persistent changes in vascular compliance in primiparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212:633.e1-6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Xu TT, Zhou F, Deng CY, Huang GQ, Li JK, Wang XD. Low-dose aspirin for preventing preeclampsia and its complications: a meta-analysis. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2015;17:567–73.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Kyozuka H, Fujimori K, Hosoya M, Yasumura S, Yokoyama T, Sato A, et al. The effect of maternal age at the first childbirth on gestational age and birth weight: The Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS). J Epidemiol. 2019;29:187–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Lykke JA, Langhoff-Ross J, Sibai BM, Funai EF, Triche EW, Paidas MJ. Hypertensive pregnancy disorders and subsequent cardiovascular morbidity and type 2 diabetes mellitus in the mother. Hypertension. 2009;53:944–51.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Harskamp RE, Zeeman GG. Preeclampsia: at risk for remote cardiovascular disease. Am J Med Sci. 2007;334:291–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Berks D, Hoedjes M, Raat H, Duvekot JJ, Steegers EA, Habbema JD. Risk of cardiovascular disease after pre-eclampsia and the effect of lifestyle interventions: a literature-based study. BJOG. 2013;120:924–31.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Villa-Etchegoyen C, Lombarte M, Matamoros N, Belizán JM, Cormick G. Mechanisms involved in the relationship between low calcium intake and high blood pressure. Nutrients. 2019;18:1112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Carroli G, Merialdi M, Wojdyla D, Abalos E, Campodonico L, Yao SE, et al. Effects of calcium supplementation on uteroplacental and fetoplacental blood flow in low-calcium-intake mothers: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202:45.e1-e9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Yamaguchi A, Kyozuka H, Fujimori K, Hosoya M, Yasumura S, Yokoyama T, et al. Risk of preterm birth, low birthweight and small-for-gestational-age infants in pregnancies with adenomyosis: A cohort study of the Japan Environment and Children’s Study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019;98:359–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Webster K, Fishburn S, Maresh M, Findlay SC, Chappell LC. Guideline Committee. Diagnosis and management of hypertension in pregnancy: summary of updated NICE guidance. BMJ. 2019;366:I5119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The findings and conclusions of this article are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not represent the official views of the Ministry of the Environment. The authors are grateful to all participants in the study. The members of the JECS Group as of 2019 are as follows: Michihiro Kamijima (principal investigator, Nagoya City University, Nagoya, Japan), Shin Yamazaki (National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, Japan), Yukihiro Ohya (National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan), Reiko Kishi (Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan), Nobuo Yaegashi (Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan), Koichi Hashimoto (Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan), Chisato Mori (Chiba University, Chiba, Japan), Shuichi Ito (Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan), Zentaro Yamagata (University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Japan), Hidekuni Inadera (University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan), Takeo Nakayama (Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan), Hiroyasu Iso (Osaka University, Suita, Japan), Masayuki Shima (Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan), Youichi Kurozawa (Tottori University, Yonago, Japan), Narufumi Suganuma (Kochi University, Nankoku, Japan), Koichi Kusuhara (University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan), and Takahiko Katoh (Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan).

Funding

The Japan Environment and Children’s Study was funded by the Ministry of the Environment of Japan. The findings and conclusions of this article are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not represent the official views of the above government. The funding had no role in the design of the study, collection and analysis of data, interpretation of the result, writing the manuscript, or decision to publish.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

All authors approved the final manuscript. H.K. initiated the concept and designed the study to which H.K., T.M., T.F., K.A., A.Y., K.F., and K.H. gave advice. M.K., A.S., and Y.O., collected the data. H.K. analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. H.N., Y.Sh., M.H., K.F., Y.Se., M.K., A.S., Y.O., K.H., and the JECS group reviewed the manuscript and gave critical advice.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hyo Kyozuka.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Japan Environment and Children’s Study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Ministry of the Environment’s Institutional Review Board on Epidemiological Studies and by the Ethics Committees of Fukushima Medical University. The JECS was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and other internationally valid regulations and guidelines for research on human subjects, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants. In JECS study, the minimum maternal age of participants was 15 years old. Written informed consent from both participants and their parent are required for JECS study if participants is under the age of 20.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to confidentiality/research subject protections. The authors, with permission of the Eco-child Study Investigation Committee and the Japan government, can make the datasets available upon reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kyozuka, H., Murata, T., Fukuda, T. et al. Association between pre-pregnancy calcium intake and hypertensive disorders during the first pregnancy: the Japan environment and children’s study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 20, 424 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03108-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Calcium intake
  • Preconception care
  • Hypertension
  • Hypertension disorder of pregnancy
  • Birth cohort study