Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Adiponectin levels in maternal serum and umbilical cord blood at birth by mode of delivery: relationship to anthropometric measurements and fetal sex

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth volume 19, Article number: 344 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The rate of cesarean section is increasing worldwide. Adiponectin is a hormone related to anti-inflammatory and anti-atherogenic effects; and it′s concentrations may change in response to inflammatory situations including surgical intervention. The aim of the current study was to investigate serum adiponectin levels in maternal and umbilical cord blood according to different modes of delivery and their relationship with anthropometric measurements and fetal sex.

Methods

The study population initially comprised 90 healthy pregnant women referred to the teaching hospital. Eventually, 40 participants in the vaginal delivery group and 35 subjects in the cesarean delivery group were recruited in to the study. Umbilical cord blood and maternal serum samples were analyzed according to the standard protocol from the manufacturer. The collected data were analyzed using SPSS-16 software. P-value < 0.05 was considered as the significance level for all tests.

Results

Our results indicated a significant association between maternal adiponectin and the mode of delivery, with adiponectin levels significantly higher in vaginal delivery compared to cesarean section (P < 0.001). However, no difference was found in umbilical cord blood adiponectin between the two groups (P = 0.51). A significant positive correlation was found between maternal serum adiponectin in the first day after birth and umbilical cord blood adiponectin in the vaginal delivery group (P = 0.007). Nevertheless, this correlation was not statistically significant in the cesarean delivery group (P = 0.62). There was also no significant correlation between fetal sex and anthropometric measurements with maternal adiponectin (P = 0.44) and umbilical cord blood adiponectin (P = 0.86).

Conclusions

The result of the current study revealed that maternal adiponectin concentration was significantly higher in vaginal delivery compared to cesarean section, which might be due to the increased levels of maternal adiponectin release during labor.

Peer Review reports

Background

Adiponectin as an active polypeptide hormone belongs to the adipokine family, which is secreted mainly from adipose tissue [1, 2] and increases insulin sensitivity [3] with anti-inflammatory and anti-atherogenic effects [4, 5]. Hypoadiponectinemia as an inflammatory marker can cause metabolic syndrome [6] and a higher incidence of diabetes [7]. Furthermore, low adiponectin levels are related to cardiovascular diseases, high blood pressure and obesity, especially visceral obesity [8,9,10]. Adiponectin concentrations and insulin sensitivity tend to decrease progressively in the first trimester of pregnancy [11,12,13]. These changes play a potential role in the enhancement of gluconeogenesis and lipolysis, and the reduction of glucose consumption in maternal muscle and fat tissue [14, 15]. In addition, it can be assumed that high production of adiponectin in the placenta and the fetus are associated with fetal growth [16].

In recent years, the rate of cesarean section (C-section) deliveries is suggestive of an increasing trend worldwide [17]. C-section as a surgical procedure is usually extremely stressful experience which can lead to an inflammatory situation and change the concentration of adiponectin [18]. The results of a systematic review revealed that C-section is associated with an increased risk of type-1 diabetes, asthma and metabolic syndrome as long-term outcomes [19].

We hypothesized that adiponectin concentrations would differ with respect to modes of delivery. Considering the rapidly rising C-section delivery rate worldwide and the little information on the role of adiponectin in fetal development; our study aimed to investigate the difference between serum adiponectin levels in maternal and umbilical cord blood according to different modes of delivery in Iranian women.

Methods

Study population

In this prospective cohort study, the study population initially comprised 90 healthy pregnant women referred to the teaching hospitals of Mahdieh Tehran and Kamali in Karaj between May and June 2016. The sample size was calculated based on the following formula and the study of Hermansson et al. [20] with 95% confidence interval and 95% power of test which equals to 33 women in each group and by considering the probability of withdrawal rate (about 30%); 45 samples were eventually included in each group of the study. Five women in the normal delivery group and ten women in the elective cesarean section group failed to meet our eligibility criteria. Finally, 40 participants in the vaginal delivery group and 35 subjects in the cesarean delivery group were recruited in to the study.

$$ \mathrm{N}={\left({\mathrm{Z}}_{1\hbox{-} \upalpha /2}+{\mathrm{Z}}_{1\hbox{-} \mathrm{B}}\right)}^2\times \left({{\mathrm{S}}_1}^2+{{\mathrm{S}}_2}^2\right)\div {\left({\overline{\mathrm{X}}}_1\hbox{-} {\overline{\mathrm{X}}}_2\right)}^2 $$

Z1-α/2 = 1.96

Z1-B = 1.64

(S1) Standard deviation of serum adiponectin after normal delivery = 7.3

(S2) Standard deviation of serum adiponectin after elective cesarean section = 6.8

\( \left({\overline{\mathrm{X}}}_1\right) \) The mean serum adiponectin levels after normal delivery= 21.6

\( \left({\overline{\mathrm{X}}}_2\right) \) The mean serum adiponectin levels after elective cesarean section =15.3

$$ \mathrm{n}=\left[{\left(1.96+1.64\right)}^2\ \left({7.3}^2+{6.8}^2\right)\right]\div {\left(21.6-15.3\right)}^2=32.6\approx 33 $$

The eligibility criteria included age between 18 and 40 years, gestational age ≥ 37 weeks, singleton pregnancy, the absence of any psychiatric disorders, and the lack of any systemic and chronic diseases such as Lupus, fatty liver, and thyroid disorders. Participants were excluded in the event of tobacco and/or alcohol consumption, any history of gastric surgery or gastric ulcer disease, gestational diabetes, preeclampsia; experiencing unusual tensions during pregnancy such as divorce, assisted vaginal delivery such as using forceps and / or vacuums, and cesarean section with hysterectomy.

Anthropometry

The gestational age was calculated from the first day of the last menstrual period (LMP); however, if there was still any uncertainty about the data, the first ultrasound within the first trimester of pregnancy was performed. Maternal weight and height were measured; and body mass index (BMI: weight [kg]/height2 [m]) was calculated using the standard equation and single investigator. The infants’ weight, length, and the circumference of the head and chest were measured at birth.

Blood collection & adiponectin measurement

Umbilical cord blood and maternal serum samples were collected without fasting after birth and within 24 h after delivery, respectively. Blood samples were immediately centrifuged at 4000 rpm at 4 °C for 10 min and aliquots of serum were frozen without delay at − 70 °C until analysis. The concentration of adiponectin (μg/ml) was measured with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using commercial kit (Human Adiponectin, Zell Bio GmbH, Ulm, Germany) according to the standard protocol from the manufacturer with a sensitivity of 0.1 μg / ml. The intra-assay coefficient of variation (CV) was 6.3%. A standardized checklist was utilized to gather anthropometric and laboratory data from mothers and infants.

Statistical analysis

Data are presented as mean (SD). A Mann-Whitney test was used to compare serum adiponectin levels in maternal and umbilical cord blood in different modes of delivery; and to determine the relationship between maternal adiponectin and umbilical cord blood with the baby’s gender. Spearman correlation test was also utilized to determine the correlation between serum adiponectin levels in maternal and umbilical cord blood with anthropometric indices. P-value < 0.05 was considered as the significance level for all tests. The data were analyzed using SPSS (version 16, SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) software.

Results

Both groups were matched according to the demographic variables including age, maternal education, number of pregnancies, number of deliveries, number of live births, miscarriages, newborn’s sex, weight, height, head and chest circumference, and maternal BMI. We found no difference between-groups with respect to different variables (Table 1). Characteristics of the participants and their infants are presented in Table 1.

Table 1 Characteristics of mothers and their infants (n = 75)
Full size table

The mean (SD) age of the study population was 28.45 (5.83) years. Almost half of the participants (49.3%) had more than 12 years of educational experience. The mean (SD) gestational age at delivery was 39.70 (+/− 0.91) weeks and 38.44 (+/− 0.37) weeks in the normal and C-section delivery groups, respectively. The result of our study indicated a significant association between maternal adiponectin and the mode of delivery with significantly higher rate in vaginal delivery compared to C-section (P < 0.001). However, no difference was seen in the umbilical cord blood adiponectin between the two groups (P = 0.51) (Table 2). According to the Spearman’s correlation, a significant positive relationship was found between maternal serum adiponectin in the first 24 h after birth and umbilical cord blood adiponectin in the vaginal delivery group (r = 0.42, P = 0.007); However, this correlation was not statistically significant in the cesarean delivery group (r = 0.085, P = 0.62) (Table 3). The infants’ mean (SD) weight, length, head and chest circumference at birth were 3234.26 ± 393.58 g, 50.60 ± 2.31 cm, 34.84 ± 1.07 cm, and 33.69 ± 1.28 cm, respectively. The concentration of adiponectin in maternal serum and umbilical cord blood based on infant’s sex are shown in Table 4. Nevertheless, no significant correlation was found between different variables and adiponectin concentration (Tables 4, 5).

Table 2 Comparison of serum adiponectin levels in maternal and umbilical cord blood according to different modes of delivery (n = 75)
Full size table
Table 3 Correlation between maternal serum adiponectin levels in the first 24 h after birth and umbilical cord blood adiponectin (n = 75)
Full size table
Table 4 Association between adiponectin concentrations in maternal serum & umbilical cord blood and infant’s sex (n = 75)
Full size table
Table 5 Correlation between adiponectin concentrations in maternal serum & umbilical cord blood adiponectin and anthropometric measurements at birth (n = 75)
Full size table

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this paper is the first study conducted in Iran to evaluate the correlation between mode of delivery and adiponectin concentration. According to our knowledge, the number of studies conducted at the international level was quiet few, especially in making comparison and correlation between cord blood and maternal adiponectin levels. The result of the current study revealed that maternal adiponectin concentration was significantly higher in vaginal delivery compared to C-section. Nevertheless, the mode of delivery did not have statistical effects on umbilical cord blood adiponectin concentrations. A similar result was obtained in Brazil, where the adiponectin concentrations were reported higher in the vaginal delivery group [18].

A plausible explanation could be the increase of corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) secretion, highly secreted under stressful conditions and enhances the release of the adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) from the pituitary and the secretion of glucocorticoids from the adrenal gland. In addition, labor is also considered as a stressful situation. Some studies reported intraventricular injection of adiponectin would increases plasma concentrations of ACTH and CRH mRNA in the parvocellular nucleus. Moreover, adiponectin depolarizes CRH secretion neurons in vitro [21, 22].

Differences in adiponectin concentration based on the mode of delivery can also be due to the active contraction in vaginal delivery. Adiponectin affects vascular smooth muscle contraction. Noble et al. demonstrated that adiponectin enhances calcium dependency of mouse bladder contraction mediated by protein kinase Cα expression. In this study, mice with high levels of adiponectin indicated higher concentrations of intracellular Ca2 +, and more contraction sensitivity to intracellular Ca2+ [23]. Although various factors can affect maternal adiponectin concentration, we couldn’t find a reasonable explanation on the correlation between mode of delivery and umbilical cord blood adiponectin. However, in the current study, this relationship was not deemed significant. In a similar study, Logan and colleagues reported a non-significant relationship between mode of delivery and umbilical cord blood adiponectin [24]. Similarly, another study reported no significant association between umbilical cord blood adiponectin and mode of delivery [25]. In contrast, Hermansson et al. reported that adiponectin concentration in umbilical cord blood was significantly higher in vaginal delivery than elective C-section [20]. This inconsistency might be due to the small number of studies on this issue.

According to the result of the present study, maternal adiponectin was positively and significantly correlated with umbilical cord blood adiponectin in vaginal delivery. Nevertheless, this correlation in C-section was not deemed significant. Similarly, some studies reported no significant association between maternal and umbilical cord blood adiponectin [26,27,28,29]. On the contrary, Luo and colleagues found a correlation between two variables [25]. A plausible explanation could be a low sample size. Compounds with the molecular weight of 500 Da can cross the placenta, whereas the molecular weight of adiponectin is 30 kilodalton which makes it impossible to cross the placenta [29]. However, due to the presence of adiponectin receptor in rat and human placenta; human placenta might be the source of adiponectin [30, 31].

Furthermore, the result of another study indicated during the term; adiponectin is expressed in the cytotrophoblast of the placenta and is secreted in both maternal and fetal blood circulation [30]. Additionally, the maternal adiponectin concentration decreases after delivery, which can indicate that the placenta plays an important role in the production of maternal adiponectin [14]. The relationship between maternal and umbilical cord blood adiponectin in the present study was not significant; this may be due to the reduced levels of adiponectin after elective C-section.

The results of this study found no significant relationship between maternal and umbilical cord blood adiponectin levels and neonate sex. In concordance with our study, Zare and colleagues reported a non-significant relationship between adiponectin concentration and gender of neonates [32]. Similarly, some studies reported no significant association between adiponectin levels and gender [26, 33,34,35].

In our study, no correlation was found between adiponectin concentrations and anthropometric measurements. In some similar studies, no relationship was seen between adiponectin and anthropometric measurements [29, 32, 33]. On the contrary, in a prospective study in China, multiple linear regression analysis indicated a positive correlation between umbilical cord blood adiponectin and anthropometric measurements [36]. Similarly, Weyermann et al. of all included variables, found a positive correlation only between birth weight and umbilical cord blood adiponectin [26]. This inconsistency might be due to the small number of studies; hence further clinical trial studies are needed.

One of the advantages of the current study was the evaluation of adiponectin serum levels of both mother’s and umbilical cord blood, which can effectively assess the mode of delivery and its outcome on the mother and baby simultaneously.

One limitation that could be considered for this study was that the elective cesarean delivery was not separated from emergency cesarean delivery.

Conclusions

The result of the current study revealed that maternal adiponectin concentration was significantly lower in C-section compared to vaginal delivery. According to the inverse association between adiponectin and insulin resistance, and considering diseases such as type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, high blood pressure, metabolic syndrome, and dyslipidemia; it can be assumed that the decrease in adiponectin levels in C-section delivery may increase the risk of the mentioned diseases later in the life of mothers and their neonates. Therefore, it is necessary to provide more attention to these women and to ensure that they are encouraged to have vaginal delivery.

Availability of data and materials

Data supporting out findings can be sent upon request.

Abbreviations

ACTH:

Adrenocorticotropic hormone

BMI:

Body mass index

CRH:

Corticotropin-releasing hormone

C-Section:

Cesarean section

CV:

Coefficient of variation

ELISA:

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

LMP:

Last menstrual period

References

  1. Scherer PE, Williams S, Fogliano M, Baldini G, Lodish HF. A novel serum protein similar to C1q, produced exclusively in adipocytes. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:26746–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hu E, Liang P, Spiegelman BM. AdipoQ is a novel adipose-specific gene dysregulated in obesity. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:10697–703.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Yamauchi T, Kamon J, Waki H, Terauchi Y, Kubota N, Hara K, et al. The fat-derived hormone adiponectin reverses insulin resistance associated with both lipoatrophy and obesity. Nat Med. 2001;7:941–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kriketos AD, Greenfield JR, Peake PW, Furler SM, Denyer GS, Charlesworth JA, et al. Inflammation, insulin resistance, and adiposity: a study of first-degree relatives of type 2 diabetic subjects. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:2033–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Shibata R, Ouchi N, Murohara T. Adiponectin and cardiovascular disease. Circ J. 2009;73:608–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Matsushita K, Yatsuya H, Tamakoshi K, Wada K, Otsuka R, Takefuji S, et al. Comparison of circulating adiponectin and proinflammatory markers regarding their association with metabolic syndrome in Japanese men. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006;26:871–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Yatagai T, Nagasaka S, Taniguchi A, Fukushima M, Nakamura T, Kuroe A, et al. Hypoadiponectinemia is associated with visceral fat accumulation and insulin resistance in Japanese men with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Metabolism. 2003;52:1274–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kumada M, Kihara S, Sumitsuji S, Kawamoto T, Matsumoto S, Ouchi N, et al. Association of hypoadiponectinemia with coronary artery disease in men. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003;23:85–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ouchi N, Ohishi M, Kihara S, Funahashi T, Nakamura T, Nagaretani H, et al. Association of hypoadiponectinemia with impaired vasoreactivity. Hypertension. 2003;42:231–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Arita Y, Kihara S, Ouchi N, Takahashi M, Maeda K, Miyagawa J, et al. Paradoxical decrease of an adipose-specific protein, adiponectin, in obesity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1999;257:79–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Williams MA, Qiu C, Muy-Rivera M, Vadachkoria S, Song T, Luthy D. Plasma adiponectin concentrations in early pregnancy and subsequent risk of gestational diabetes mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89:2306–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Paradisi G, Ianniello F, Tomei C, Bracaglia M, Carducci B, Gualano MR, et al. Longitudinal changes of adiponectin, carbohydrate and lipid metabolism in pregnant women at high risk for gestational diabetes. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2010;26:539–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Nanda S, Savvidou M, Syngelaki A, Akolekar R, Nicolaides KH. Prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus from maternal factors and biomarkers at 11–13 weeks. Prenat Diagn. 2011;31:135–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mazaki-Tovi S, Kanety H, Pariente C, Hemi R, Wiser A, Schiff E, et al. Maternal serum adiponectin levels during human pregnancy. J Perinatol. 2007;27(2):77–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Aye I, Powell T, Jansson T. Adiponectin – the missing link between maternal adiposity, placental transport and fetal growth: review. Placenta. 2013;34:40–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cortelazzi D, Corbetta S, Ronzoni S, Pelle F, Marconi A, Cozzi V, et al. Maternal and foetal resistin and adiponectin concentrations in normal and complicated pregnancies. Clin Endocrinol. 2007;66:447–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Betrán AP, Merialdi M, Lauer JA, Bing-Shun W, Thomas J, Van Look P, et al. Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2007;21:98–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rebelo F, Franco-Sena AB, Struchiner CJ, Kac G. Changes in maternal plasma adiponectin from late pregnancy to the postpartum period according to the mode of delivery: results from a prospective cohort in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. PLoS One. 2016;11(7):0158886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hyde MJ, Modi N. The long-term effects of birth by caesarean section: the case for randomized controlled trial. Early Hum Dev. 2012;88:943–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hermansson H, Hoppu U, Isolauri E. Elective caesarean section is associated with low adiponectin levels in cord blood. Neonatology. 2014;105(3):172–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Qi Y, Takahashi N, Hileman SM, Patel HR, Berg AH, Pajvani UB, et al. Adiponectin acts in the brain to decrease body weight. Nat Med. 2004;10:524–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hoyda TD, Samson WK, Ferguson AV. Adiponectin depolarizes parvocellular paraventricular nucleus neurons controlling neuroendocrine and autonomic function. Endocrinology. 2009;150(2):832–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Nobe K, Fujii A, Saito K, Negoro T, Ogawa Y, Nakano Y, et al. Adiponectin enhances calcium dependency of mouse bladder contraction mediated by protein kinase ca expression. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2013;345(1):62–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Logan CA, Thiel L, Bornemann R, Koenig W, Reister F, Brenner H, et al. Delivery mode, duration of labor, and cord blood adiponectin, leptin, and C-reactive protein: results of the population-based Ulm birth cohort studies. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):0149918.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Luo ZC, Nuyt AM, Delvin E, Fraser WD, Julien P, Audibert F, et al. Maternal and fetal leptin, adiponectin levels and associations with fetal insulin sensitivity. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013;21(1):210–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Weyermann M, Beermann C, Brenner H, Rothenbacher D. Adiponectin and leptin in maternal serum, cord blood, and breast Milk. Clin Chem. 2006;52:2095–102.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang J, Shang LX, Dong X, Wang X, Wu N, Wang SH, et al. Relationship of adiponectin and resistin levels in umbilical serum, maternal serum and placenta with neonatal birth weight. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;50(5):432–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kyriakakou M, Malamitsi-Puchner A, Militsi H, Boutsikou T, Margeli A, Hassiakos D, et al. Leptin and adiponectin concentrations in intrauterine growth restricted and appropriate for gestational age fetuses, neonates, and their mothers. Eur J Endocrinol. 2008;158(3):343–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Chan TF, Yuan SS, Chen HS, Guu CF, Wu LC, Yeh YT, et al. Correlations between umbilical and maternal serum adiponectin levels and neonatal birthweights. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004;83:165–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Chen J, Tan B, Karteris E, Zervou S, Digby J, Hillhouse EW, et al. Secretion of adiponectin by human placenta: differential modulation of adiponectin and its receptors by cytokines. Diabetologia. 2006;49:1292–302.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Caminos JE, Nogueiras R, Gallego R, Bravo S, Tovar S, García-Caballero T, et al. Expression and regulation of adiponectin and receptor in human and rat placenta. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90:4276–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Zare F, Moradizirkohi A, Maghbooli Zh, Hossein-nezhad A, Rahmani M, Larijani B. Relationship between serum umbilical cord and maternal leptin and adiponectin concentrations with fetal growth parameters. Iranian J Publ Health. 2007;36(Supple 1):75-9.

  33. Hytinantti T, Kajantie E, Karonen SL, Andersson S. Postnatal changes in ghrelin, adiponectin, insulin and leptin concentrations in term newborns. Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2008;3:127–34.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Pardo IM, Geloneze B, Tambascia MA, Barros-Filho AA. Hyperadiponectinemia in newborns: relationship with leptin levels and birth weight. Obes Res. 2004;12(3):521–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Kotani Y, Yokota I, Kitamura S, Matsuda J, Naito E, Kuroda Y. Plasma adiponectin levels in newborns are higher than those in adults and positively correlated with birth weight. Clin Endocrinol. 2004;61(4):418–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang ZQ, Lu QG, Huang J, Jiao CY, Huang SM, Mao LM. Maternal and cord blood adiponectin levels in relation to post-natal body size in infants in the first year of life: a prospective study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16:189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to gratefully acknowledge the contribution and cooperation of Kamali and Mahdieh hospitals and laboratory of Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences of Shahid Beheshti University.

Funding

The study was funded by Tarbiat Modares University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Midwifery & Reproductive Health, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Jalal Ale Ahmad Highway, P.O.Box: 14115-111, Tehran, Iran

    Seyedeh Razieh Fazeli Daryasari, Najmeh Tehranian, Fatemeh Razavinia, Fatemeh Tork Tatari & Fattaneh Pahlavan

  2. Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

    Anoshirvan Kazemnejad

Authors
  1. Seyedeh Razieh Fazeli Daryasari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Najmeh Tehranian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Anoshirvan Kazemnejad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Fatemeh Razavinia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Fatemeh Tork Tatari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Fattaneh Pahlavan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SRFD performed the research, literature review, wrote the draft, and revising the manuscript. NT contributed to the study conception, designed the study and revising the manuscript. FR, FTT, FP, SRFD collected clinical data, performed the laboratory experiments and data interpretation. AK, FR, SRFD contributed to data analysis. NT, SRFD participated in reviewing and approved the final manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Najmeh Tehranian.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Tarbiat Modares University (Approval Code IR.TMU.REC.1395.350). The study’s purpose was explained to selected individuals, and a written informed consent was obtained from all subjects prior to their participation in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fazeli Daryasari, S.R., Tehranian, N., Kazemnejad, A. et al. Adiponectin levels in maternal serum and umbilical cord blood at birth by mode of delivery: relationship to anthropometric measurements and fetal sex. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 19, 344 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2460-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2460-y

Keywords

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

ISSN: 1471-2393

Contact us