Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Placenta response of inflammation and oxidative stress in low-risk term childbirth: the implication of delivery mode

BMC Pregnancy and ChildbirthBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:407

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1589-9

Received: 14 April 2017

Accepted: 22 November 2017

Published: 6 December 2017

Abstract

Background

Caesarean delivery rate is increasing gradually in China and there is no doubt that delivery mode is closely associated with the maternal health and infant development.This study examined the independent effect of delivery mode on placenta inflammation response and oxidative stress response.

Methods

A total of 3474 pregnant women recruited in Ma’anshan Birth Cohort Study were the initial study population. Data on maternal socio-demographic characteristics and pre-pregnancy BMI were collected at their 1st antenatal checkups. Pregnancy-specific anxiety was assessed during the three trimesters of pregnancy. Common pregnant complications were monitored in the whole pregnancy period. Delivery modes, as well as newborn characteristics were abstracted from medical records. Delivery modes included vaginal deliveries (VD), caesarean delivery with medical indications (CDMI), caesarean delivery on maternal request (CDMR) and urgent cesarean delivery (UCD). Placentas were collected during childbirth. The mRNA expression of IL-1β, TNF-a, IL-6, IFN-γ, IL-4, IL-10, IL-8, and HO-1 were assessed in the final sample of 1978 low-risk women with singleton term-births.

Results

The overall rate of caesarean delivery (CD) was 50.5% (1650/3265) in singleton term childbirths in this study. Among women who reported definite CD reasons, 56.8%of them chose the surgery without any medical indications.It shows a non-linear relationship between cytokines related with placenta inflammatory response, oxidative stress response and different delivery modes. At high percentiles of IL-1β, IFN-γ and IL-8, women with CDMR had higher expression levels compared to women with VD. Women with CDMI had higher levels at median percentiles of IL-1β, IFN-γ and IL-8. Women with CDMR had higher expression compared with VD at high percentiles of IL-6 and HO-1, and women with CDMI had higher levels of these two cytokines at their low percentiles. It is worth noting that at high percentiles, compared with normal delivery, the expression of IL-1β, IFN-γ, IL-8 and HO-1 have significantly altered in women with CDMR.

Conclusion

A high overall CD rate was found in this study, and caesarean delivery on maternal request was the major contributor to the high prevalence. Maternal placental oxidative stress and inflammatory response were closely associated with delivery mode. The effect is much amplified at high levels of expression in women who chose CD on maternal request.Such difference needs to be noticed and may have important implications for obstetricians, midwives and other perinatal health care workers.

Keywords

Delivery modePlacentaInflammationOxidative stress

Background

Caesarean delivery (CD) is a surgical procedure performed when a vaginal delivery (VD) would put the baby or mother at risk. In the past decades, the incidence of CD has dramatically risen worldwide. In the United States, the CD rate has increased from 5.8% in 1970 to 32.3% in 2008 [1]. Similarly, it has been increasing rapidly from 1980s in developing countries. As showed in the WHO report, the overall rate of CD was 27.3% in Asia in 2007–2008, and China had the highest rate of 46.2% among them and 40% of cesareans were reported to have no clinical indications [2]. Recently, WHO Global Survey of Maternal and Perinatal Health (WHOGS; 2004–08) and the WHO Multi-Country Survey of Maternal and Newborn Health (WHOMCS; 2010–11) reported that the CD rate of China has already increased to 47.6% [3]. Based on the latest data from 150 countries in Asia, arecent study suggested that the CD rate in Wuhan of China was over 50% [4]. It’s worth noting that elective caesarean delivery (ECD) contributes mainly to this uprising trend [5, 6]. ECD is commonly arranged ahead of time before labor, including the planned surgery due to medical indications (CD with medical indications, CDMI) which have developed before or during the pregnancy, and scheduled operation defined as on maternal request without medical indications (CD on maternal request, CDMR). CDMR was the predominant contributor to the increase of CD in China [5, 79].

As a strong acute process of stress, childbirth can cause a lot of endocrine and immunological change both in women and in neonates. Both inflammation and oxidative stress responses are especially remarkable during this period. Inflammatory and oxidative stress responses act as crucial part in immune functions and neural development [10, 11]. Oxidative stress has been suggested as a causative agent in human pregnancy-related disorders, such as embryonic resorption, recurrent pregnancy loss, preeclampsia, intra-uterine growth restriction, and fetal death [12]. It is worth noting that the labor plays an important role in the expression of inflammation response and/or oxidative stress response. Myometrium contractility and cervix dilation stimulated by the elevating level of prostaglandin biosynthesis in vaginal delivery are accompanied with high fluctuation of cytokines, such as interleukin-1β (IL-1β), IL-6 and tumor necrosis factor-a (TNF-a) [13]. It is now well-known that oxidative stress increases during normal pregnancy, and woman will experience different degrees of oxidative stress in cesarean delivery and vaginal delivery [14, 15]. Hung et al. [15] showed evidence of increased placental oxidative stress in 37 women with vaginal deliveries as compared with other 36 women with elective cesarean sections. Bakheitet al [16], using a sample of 76 women, had found concentrations of interferon γ (IFN-γ), IL-4 and IL-10 in the peripheral and placental sera were higher in VD compared to ECD.

Previous studies that focused on the association of delivery mode with inflammation response or oxidative stress response have mainly used a cross-sectional or register-based study design. As is known that experiences and exposures during pregnancy will distinctly alter maternal and placenta inflammation and oxidative stressresponses, such as maternal psychological stress and severe pregnant complications [1719]. Jun et al. [17] showed more macrophages accumulate in placenta ofpregnancy complicated with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), and the expression levels of pro-inflammation factors are also increasedin GDM pregnancies, suggesting that macrophages and inflammatory mediators (IL-6 andTNF-α) may play an important role in GDM. The fetus of diabetic mothers develops inan inflammatory milieu. Radaelliet al [18] speculated that changes inexpression of specific placental genes may be a leadingcause to adverse fetal programming in GDM pregnancies. Bronson et al. [19] demonstrated that maternalstress induces placental inflammation, the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6 and IL-1β increased, specifically inmale placentas. However, cross-sectional study design cannot address the causal relationship between delivery mode and inflammation response or oxidative stress response. Thus, based on a large community-based birth cohort, this study aimed to investigate the independent effect of delivery mode on the placenta inflammation and oxidative stress responsesin low-risk term childbirths.

Methods

Participant recruitment

Participants of this study were recruited into the Ma’anshan Birth Cohort Study (MBCS), which was conducted in the maternal and child health center in Ma’anshan city, Anhui Province, China. Women were invited to participate in the MBCS at the 1st antenatal visit (before 14 gestational weeks) by special maternal and childcare doctors from May 2013 to September 2014. All participants provided written informed consents after understanding the aim and content of this study. The study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Anhui Medical University (number: 20,131,401).

Maternal and newborn characteristics

Socio-demographic characteristics

Baseline socio-demographic data were collected from all participated women for the subsequent follow-ups. Women were asked to fill in a questionnaire in each trimester of pregnancy. General socio-demographic characteristics were collected in the 1st trimester’s questionnaires, including maternal age, household income, gravidity and previous adverse pregnant outcome. Body height and body weight were measured during the 1st antenatal visit. The body weight was regarded as pre-pregnancy body weight and pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI = kg/m2) was calculated from weight (kg) divided by the square of height (m2).

Pregnancy-specific anxiety assessment

In each trimester of pregnancy, pregnancy-specific anxiety was assessed by a pregnancy-specific anxiety questionnaire developed by our research team [20]. It is a 4-point Likertquestionnaire consisting of 13 items. It covered three dimensions: anxiety regarding women’s own health, anxiety on fetal growth and development and anxiety about the safety and success of childbirth process. Women were asked to self-rate their perception from 1 to 4 points varying from no worries, occasionally worried, often worried to always worried. Scores ranged from 13 to 52, higher scores indicating higher level of pregnancy-specific anxiety. The test–retest reliability coefficient and Cronbach’s alpha coefficient were 0.79 and 0.81, respectively. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the values of root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), goodness-of-fit index (GFI), normed fit index (NFI) and comparative-fit index (CFI) were 0.07, 0.95, 0.90 and 0.91, respectively. It is the first instrument to assess pregnancy-specific anxiety and maternal life events in China and is regarded as an appropriate tool for maternal psychosocial evaluation and intervention [20].

Monitoring of pregnant complications

Blood pressure, blood sugar and total bile acid (TBA) levels were continuously monitored in the entire pregnancy. Hypertension disorders complicating pregnancy (HDCP) includes pregnancy-induced hypertension, preeclampsia or eclampsia, pregnancy with chronic hypertension, and chronic hypertension complicated with preeclampsia. The diagnostic criteria for gestational hypertension: 1. blood pressure was firstly found to rise in pregnancy (systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg); 2. no proteinuria; 3. blood pressure decreased to normal level within 12 weeks after delivery. Preeclampsia was diagnosed as: systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg, together with proteinuria ≥0.3 g/24 h or random urine protein (+), might complicate with upper abdominal discomfort, headache and other symptoms in women after 20 gestational weeks.

GDM was screened on week 24–28 of pregnancy. In the medical records, GDM was confirmed by the standard diagnosis protocol in China using a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Women were asked to have an oral glucose after fasting for 12 h. Fasting level of blood glucose, blood glucose level of 1 h and 2 h after oral administration were assessed. The threshold was set as: (i) fasting blood glucose ≥5.6 mmol/L, (ii) blood glucose level at 1 h after oral administration ≥10.3 mmol/L, (iii) blood glucose level at 2 h after oral administration ≥8.6 mmol/L. GDM was diagnosed when no less than two of the three parameters reached or exceeded the normal value. Women with existing pregestational diabetes mellitus were excluded from the sample.

Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) was diagnosed when TBA level ≥ 10 μmol/L.

Collection of newborn characteristics data

Data on childbirth, such as gestational age at birth, infant gender, birth weight, 1-Min Apgar score, 5-Min Apgar score and placental size (mm3 = Length*Width*Height) were abstracted from medical records. Infants with gestational age under 37 weeks were defined as preterm infants. Delivery modes included vaginal deliveries (VD), CDMI, CDMR and urgent cesarean delivery (UCD) in this study. CDMR was defined as CD due to maternal request with no medical indicationsinterm single birth. CDMI, together with CDMR, were defined as elective CD (ECD). UCD was defined as an urgent CD conducted due to medical indications or other causes after the onset of labor.

Measurement of inflammation and oxidative stress responses

Collection of placenta tissues

Placenta tissues were collected within 30 min after delivery. Washed by normal saline, one single lobule was taken out in the placenta vertically where there was no calcification or fascia. It was then divided into 4 average parts and fixed quickly in liquid nitrogen. A total of 2554 placental specimens were assessed in this study.

qRTPCR measurement of inflammatory cytokines and oxidative stress cytokines

Pro-inflammatory cytokines (including IL-1β, IL-6, IFN-γ and TNF-α), anti-inflammatory cytokines (like IL-4, IL-10), and pro-inflammatory chemokines (IL-8) were selected according to the literature [10, 2126]. Heme-oxygenase-1 (HO-1) was regarded as biomarker of oxidative stress. All RNA quality was assessed using Nanodrop® ND-1000 (Nano Drop, USA), then total RNA (1.0 μg) was reverse-transcribed into cDNA using the AMV Reverse Transcription System (Promega, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions with the value of 260/280 ≥ 1.8. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction was used to measure the mRNA expression of each cytokine. The amplification reactions were runon a Light Cycler® 480II Instrument (Roche, Germany). In addition, the real-time PCR running protocol was an initial hold step (95 °C for 10 min) and 45 cycles of a three-step PCR (95 °C for 15 s, 60 °C for 15 s, 72 °C for 20 s). All RT-qPCR data were normalized through an endogenous reference RNA, 18SrRNA. Delta Ct (ΔCt) was defined as the expression difference between the target mRNA and the normalizing RNA: ΔCt = Ct mRNA- Ct normalizing RNA.Due to the large sample size, we could not measure the gene concentration duplicate. In order to certify the quality of measurement, we tripled measured all cytokines randomly using 4 samples in qPCR, and the coefficients of variation were almost less than 1.

Statistical analysis

To reach the normality and the homogeneity of the variance assumptions, our mRNA expression values were transformed to the natural logarithm. One-way ANOVA was used to evaluate maternal factors, infants’ characteristics and maternal placental mRNA expression of cytokines in 4 kinds of delivery modes. Pairwise comparisons were performed using LSD test. Pearson Chi-Square Test (χ2) was used to assess the rate of infant gender and rate of previous adverse pregnant outcomes among the 4groups. Quantile regression model was utilized to adjust for confounding factors, including pre-pregnancy BMI, maternal age, gestational age, gravidity, previous adverse pregnant outcome, pregnancy-specific Anxiety in 1st, 2nd and 3rd trimesters, infant gender, birth weightand placental size.Statistical tests were two-sided and performed with stata 14.0. All results were considered statistically significant at P value <0.05.

Result

Rate of caesarean delivery

As showed in Fig. 1, in a total of 3474 women, 162 women were excluded due to different kinds of abortion, ectopic pregnancy and stillbirth. There were 3312 women with childbirth in the cohort study. Eight women without delivery mode records and 39 with twin pregnancies were further excluded. Thus, the overall rate of CD was 50.5% (1650/3265) in singleton live births in this study. Due to 112 missing data on reasons for CD, totally 1538 women choosing CD had definite causes. Among those women, 94.9% (1459/1538) chose ECD, in which CDMR and CDMIaccounted for 56.8% (828/1459) and 43.2% (631/1459), respectively.
Fig. 1

Participants recruitment flow chart. ICP intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy; HDCP hypertension disorders complicating pregnancy; GDM gestational diabetes mellitus; VD vaginal delivery; CDMI cesarean delivery with medical indication; CDMR cesarean delivery on maternal request; UCD urgent cesarean delivery

General characteristics of participants

According to the study design, women with no information on delivery mode, twin pregnancies, women without placenta,and women with preterm birth and pregnancy complications such as ICP or HDCP or GDM were excluded. We also excluded a small sample of 7 assisted vaginal deliveries. Finally, 1031 women with VD, 348 with CDMI, 552 with CDMRand 47 with UCD were included as the study sample for data analysis (Fig. 1).

We found that maternal age, gravidity and pre-pregnancy BMI of participants included were lower than those excluded (P <0.05). Gestational age of included women was higher compared to those excluded (P <0.001). Newborns’ height, 1-Min Apgar score and 5-Min Apgar score of included infants were higher than those excluded (P <0.05).

The included participants’ characteristics were summarized in Table 1. Significant differences in maternal age, gravidity, pre-pregnancy BMI, previous adverse pregnant outcomes, birth weight, birth height, head circumference and placental size among 4 groups were observed. Women who chose VD were younger than those who chose CD (P<0.001), and maternal age was highest in women choosing CDMI. The gravidity was lower in women who terminated pregnancy with VD than those with ECD (P<0.001), in which women with CDMI had higher gravidity than women with CDMR (P = 0.002). Women with UCD had the highest pre-pregnancy BMI while those with VD had the lowest value (P<0.001). No significant differences were found in pregnancy-specific anxiety scores across the three trimesters of pregnancy. Newborns from CD had higher birth weight than those from VD (P<0.001), those from UCD being the highest. Infants born by ECD had higher head circumferences than those born by VD (P<0.001). CDMI infants had the highest head circumference among the four groups. As to the placental size, women choosing VD had smaller sizes than those who chose CDMI (P<0.001), CDMR (P<0.001) or UCD (P = 0.038).
Table 1

Maternal and infants’ characteristics in 4 kinds of delivery modes

Characteristics

VD

CDMI

CDMR

UCD

P Value

Maternal characteristics

 Maternal age(years)

25.95 ± 3.02

27.41 ± 3.83

26.48 ± 3.73

27.15 ± 2.87

<0.001

 Gestational age(weeks)

39.20 ± 1.22

39.12 ± 1.37

39.29 ± 1.06

39.15 ± 1.18

0.191

 Gravidity

1.55 ± 0.80

1.83 ± 1.04

1.65 ± 0.86

1.72 ± 0.83

<0.001

 Pre-pregnancy BMI(kg/m2)

19.96 ± 2.32

20.73 ± 2.75

20.44 ± 2.66

20.88 ± 2.71

<0.001

 Previous adverse pregnant outcome

638(61.9%)

187(54.0%)

317(57.7%)

24(51.1%)

0.032

 Pregnancy-specific anxiety score in 1st trimester

20.26 ± 4.82

19.80 ± 4.26

20.55 ± 5.13

19.55 ± 3.72

0.191

 Pregnancy-specific anxiety score in 2nd trimester

19.61 ± 4.44

19.91 ± 4.62

19.92 ± 4.90

19.27 ± 3.84

0.459

 Pregnancy-specific anxiety score in 3rd trimester Infants’ characteristics

18.72 ± 4.00

18.96 ± 4.30

19.17 ± 4.63

18.76 ± 3.43

0.245

Gender

    

0.174

 Male

544(52.8%)

163(46.8%)

281(50.9%)

28(59.6%)

 

 Female

487(47.2%)

185(53.2%)

271(49.1%)

19(40.4%)

Birth weight(g)

3304.81 ± 379.63

3443.95 ± 467.26

3417.05 ± 397.17

3481.70 ± 350.30

<0.001

Birth height(cm)

50.13 ± 1.71

50.03 ± 1.76

49.95 ± 1.51

50.70 ± 1.54

0.013

Head circumference(cm)

33.82 ± 1.30

34.33 ± 1.73

34.20 ± 1.46

34.14 ± 2.04

<0.001

Placental size(cm3)

685.79 ± 180.12

815.70 ± 224.56

799.87 ± 207.96

754.31 ± 230.07

<0.001

Apgar score

 1-Min

9.95 ± 0.46

9.94 ± 0.53

9.97 ± 0.42

9.91 ± 0.46

0.784

 5-Min

9.98 ± 0.23

9.99 ± 0.16

10.00 ± 0.04

10.00 ± 0.00

0.219

VD vaginal delivery, CDMI cesarean delivery with medical indication, CDMR cesarean deliveryon maternal request, UCD urgent cesarean delivery, BMI body mass index; data presented with mean ± SD and n(%)

Distribution of cytokines related to inflammation and oxidative stress among various modes of delivery

As it was depicted for average expression level of cytokines related to inflammation and oxidative stress among various modes of delivery in Table 2, significant differences were found among VD, CDMI, CDMR and UCD groups in IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-8 and HO-1 mRNA expressions. In pro-inflammatory cytokines, the levels of mRNA expression were the highest in UCD women. Level of IL-1β mRNA expression was significantly higher in women with VD than those with CDMR (P = 0.007). TNF-α expressed lower in VD compared to those in CDMR or UCD (P = 0.003 and P = 0.031). In IL-8, level of mRNA expression either in CDMI or CDMR was significantly less than in VD(P = 0.009 and P <0.001), and it significantly increased in UCD women compared to those with CDMR(P = 0.049). About HO-1 mRNA expression, women with CDMI or with CDMR had significant higher level than those with VD (P = 0.039 and P = 0.002).
Table 2

Maternal placental mRNA expression of cytokines in 4 kinds of delivery modes (mean ± SE)

Cytokines

VD

CDMI

CDMR

UCD

P Value

Pro-inflammatory cytokines

 IL-1β

0.98 ± 0.04

0.85 ± 0.07

0.77 ± 0.06

1.04 ± 0.22

0.042

 TNF-α

1.36 ± 0.05

1.47 ± 0.08

1.59 ± 0.06

1.84 ± 0.23

0.007

 IL-6

0.73 ± 0.04

0.85 ± 0.06

0.90 ± 0.06

1.02 ± 0.22

0.063

 IFN-γ

1.18 ± 0.06

1.12 ± 0.09

1.15 ± 0.07

1.59 ± 0.25

0.399

 IL-8

0.87 ± 0.04

0.65 ± 0.07

0.55 ± 0.06

0.96 ± 0.20

<0.001

Anti-inflammatory cytokines

 IL-4

0.93 ± 0.05

0.81 ± 0.08

0.89 ± 0.06

1.19 ± 0.22

0.354

 IL-10

1.07 ± 0.05

0.99 ± 0.08

0.96 ± 0.07

1.11 ± 0.23

0.538

Oxidative stress cytokines

 HO-1

0.91 ± 0.04

1.09 ± 0.08

1.15 ± 0.06

0.90 ± 0.16

0.009

VD vaginal delivery, CDMI cesarean delivery with medical indication, CDMR cesarean deliveryon maternal request, UCD urgent cesarean delivery

Effect of delivery mode on cytokines related to inflammation and oxidative stress

Table 3 presented the adjusted effect of delivery modes on quintiles of IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6, IFN-γ, IL-8, IL-10 and HO-1 mRNA expression in maternal placenta. The mode of delivery was the major independent variable and VD was regarded as the control group in the quintile regression model. The covariates that were adjusted for included pre-pregnancy BMI, maternal age, gestational age, gravidity, previous adverse pregnant outcome, pregnancy-specific anxiety scores in three trimesters of pregnancy, infant gender, birth weight and placental size.
Table 3

Adjusted effect of delivery modes on quintiles of IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6, IFN-γ, IL-8, IL-10 and HO-1 mRNA expression of maternal placenta

Cytokines

Groups

Quantile regressions

 

10th

25th

50th

75th

90th

IL-1β

CDMI

0.11(−0.28,0.51)

0.03(−0.21,0.26)

−0.26(−0.51,-0.01)*

−0.20(−0.49,0.09)

−0.23(−0.59,0.13)

CDMR

0.09(−0.25,0.43)

−0.14(−0.38,0.10)

−0.23(−0.50,0.03)

−0.30(−0.43,-0.17)*

−0.45(−0.67,-0.22)*

UCD

0.43(−0.35,1.21)

0.39(−0.14,0.92)

−0.07(−0.57,0.44)

−0.01(−0.58,0.58)

−0.41(−1.53,0.71)

TNF-α

CDMI

0.20(−0.21,0.62)

0.15(−0.19,0.49)

0.12(−0.11,0.34)

−0.01(−0.30,0.28)

−0.02(−0.47,0.44)

CDMR

0.31(−0.04,0.67)

0.27(−0.06,0.60)

0.20(−0.02,0.41)

0.03(−0.21,0.27)

0.06(−0.19,0.31)

UCD

0.34(−0.51,1.19)

0.36(−0.19,0.90)

−0.02(−0.83,0.79)

−0.06(−1.36,1.24)

1.11(−0.60,2.83)

IL-6

CDMI

0.56(0.30,0.81)*

0.04(−0.12,0.20)

0.11(−0.07,0.28)

−0.06(−0.30,0.19)

0.06(−0.25,0.38)

CDMR

0.39(0.55,0.73)*

0.15(−0.03,0.33)

0.19(−0.03,0.41)

0.27(0.09,0.45)*

0.20(0.06,0.35)*

UCD

0.37(−0.50,1.25)

0.26(−0.10,0.62)

0.58(−0.41,0.53)

−0.31(−0.92,0.29)

0.64(−1.38,2.65)

IFN-γ

CDMI

0.20(−0.31,0.71)

0.12(−0.32,0.57)

−0.15(−0.46,0.17)

−0.14(−0.40,0.11)

−0.20(−0.69,0.28)

CDMR

0.12(−0.25,0.48)

0.17(−0.39,0.72)

−0.07(−0.35,0.20)

−0.25(−0.48,-0.02)*

−0.23(−0.62,0.15)

UCD

−0.13(−2.21,1.94)

0.32(−0.45,1.10)

0.05(−1.15,1.26)

0.33(−0.65,1.31)

0.26(−0.45,0.97)

IL-8

CDMI

0.03(−0.21,0.28)

−0.17(−0.48,0.14)

−0.21(−0.53,0.11)

−0.32(−0.63,-0.01)*

−0.37(−0.62,-0.13)*

CDMR

−0.07((−0.30,0.16)

−0.34(−0.56,-0.11)*

−0.40(−0.64,-0.16)*

−0.40(−0.63,-0.17)*

−0.29(−0.53,-0.06)*

UCD

0.15(−0.36,0.67)

−0.27(−0.90,0.36)

−0.01(−0.71,0.70)

0.10(−0.96,1.16)

−0.19(−1.25,0.86)

IL-10

CDMI

−0.06(−0.34,0.23)

−0.02(−0.31,0.27)

0.01(−0.34,0.35)

0.03(−0.44,0.49)

0.07(−0.24,0.38)

CDMR

−0.02(−0.27,0.23)

−0.15(−0.41,0.11)

−0.19(−0.45,0.07)

0.01(−0.42,0.43)

0.26(−0.23,0.75)

UCD

−0.17(−1.00.0.65)

0.07(−0.50,0.65)

−0.19(−0.76,0.38)

−0.71(−1.13,-0.29)*

−0.35(−1.70,1.00)

HO-1

CDMI

0.18(−0.28,0.64)

0.25(0.04,0.45)*

0.30(0.10,0.50)*

0.01(−0.25,0.26)

0.31(−0.09,0.71)

CDMR

0.13(−0.17,0.43)

0.24(−0.04,0.52)

0.37(0.21,0.53)*

0.23(−0.01,0.48)

0.41(0.04,0.78)*

UCD

0.11(−0.74,0.96)

0.26(−0.33,0.84)

−0.01(−0.31,0.28)

0.17(−0.68,1.02)

−0.18(−0.74,0.39)

Data were presented by quantile regression coefficients and 95% CIs (Confidence intervals) which based on above cytokines mRNA expression. Vaginal delivery group was regarded as control; CDMI cesarean delivery with medical indication, CDMR cesarean deliveryon maternal request, UCD urgent cesarean delivery

Model was adjusted by these variables: pre pregnancy BMI, maternal age, gravidity, previous adverse pregnant outcome, pregnancy-specific Anxiety Score in 1st, 2nd and 3rd trimester, birth weight, gestational age, infant gender and placental size

*P values less than 0.05 were considered significant (two-sided)

Delivery modes were associated with IL-1β, IL-6, IFN-γ, IL-8, IL-10 and HO-1 mRNA expression at different quintiles. At the 50th percentile of IL-1β, women with CDMI had significantly lower expression level than those with VD. Both at the 75th and 90th percentiles of IL-1β, the expression levels were lower in women with CDMR compared to those with VD. At the 10th percentile of IL-6, women with CDMI and CDMR had higher level compared with those with VD. At the 75th and 90th percentiles, the expression levels were higher in CDMR than VD. As for IL-8 mRNA expression, almost at all percentiles, the levels were lower in women with CDMR. At the 75th and 90th percentiles, the levels were lower in women with CDMI as well. At the 25th and 50th percentiles of HO-1 mRNA expression, women who chose CDMI had higher levels; while at the 50th and 90th percentiles, the levels were higher in women with CDMR.

In short, at median and high percentiles, women who had childbirth with elective caesarean delivery had lower expression of IL-1β and IFN-γ than women choosing vaginal delivery. In particular, women with CDMR had significantly lower level at high percentiles of IL-1β and IFN-γ. Women with CDMR had lower levels of IL-8 at low, median and high percentiles. At low and high percentiles of IL-6, women with CDMR had significantly higher level than women with VD. At median and high percentiles of HO-1, women with CDMR had higher level compared to those with VD. Women with CDMI had higher expression at low percentiles of IL-6, as well as at low and median percentiles of HO-1.

Discussion

In current study, the overall rate of CDfound to be 50.5% in singleton live births in this study. Due to 112 missing data on reasons for choosing CD, we cannot calculate the accurate prevalence of ECD or UCD. Even so, we are concerned with the high CD rate observed here, which was higher than that reported by WHO multi-country surveys [3]. In addition, in women who reported definite reasons for CD, 56.8% chose the surgery without any medical indications. Caesarean delivery on maternal request has played the major role in the upward trend of CD rate. The reasons for the very highoverall cesarean delivery rate and CDMR in China are complex, social and cultural factors are the major contributors to the high cesarean delivery rate in China [27].

We have found a complex variation of cytokines related with placenta inflammatory response and oxidative stress response with different delivery modes, especially between elective caesarean delivery and vaginal delivery. It shows a non-linear relationship between these cytokines and delivery modes. In detail, at high percentiles of IL-1β, IFN-γ and IL-8, women with CDMR had higher expression levels compared to women with VD. Mothers with CDMI had higher levels at median percentiles of IL-1β, IFN-γ and IL-8. Women with CDMR had higher expression compared with VD at high percentiles of IL-6 and HO-1, and women with CDMI had higher levels of these two cytokines at their low percentiles. It is worth noting that at high percentiles, compared with normal delivery, the expression of IL-1β, IFN-γ, IL-8 and HO-1 have significantly altered in women with CDMR. The process of childbirth is accompanied by an increase in oxidative aggression.Delivering by CDMRs is not always less stressedthan those who deliver in a natural manner. It might be speculated that when the stress intensity is much strong, even without any medical conditions that can potentially affect the inflammatory and oxidative stress process, women will still suffer with obviously fluctuant levels of cytokines related to oxidative stress response and inflammatory response. Such endocrine alteration can cause negative outcomes in mothers and neonates. For example, a sudden increase in oxygenation exposes the neonate into oxidative stress since the DNA oxidative damage in mononuclear cells of umbilical blood as well as other indexes related to redox status [28]. The remarkable shift of oxidative stress and inflammatory response in surgery delivery on maternal request has provided the evidence that mothers and newborns from CDMRs may face more harmful potentials compared with their peers from natural spontaneous deliveries.

Our finding is partly consistent with the results reported by Keelan et al. [29], which in amniotic tissues of women delivered by spontaneous labor at term, the median IL-8, and IL-1β concentrations are 3.8 to 5.4 times those of tissues from women delivered at term without labor, while our findings on IL-6 are quite opposite to their results, as they still observe an elevated level in women with natural delivery. We have also obtained similar findings about IL-1β with the report by Gedikbaşi et al. [30], whose research team shows that cord blood IL-1β level of UCD group were significantly higher than those of ECD and normal delivery groups, and the level of IL-1β in women with normal delivery was significantly higher than those withECD. Bakheitet al [16] suggest that concentrations of IFN-γ, IL-4 and IL-10 in the placental sera were higher in vaginal delivery. However, we have not found significant difference in IL-4 among various delivery modes.

Gestation is a physiologic state in which oxygen demand is increased and high energy was required for various body functions. These increments in the in-taking and utilizing of oxygen lead to alterations in the oxidant-antioxidant balance, particularly toward the oxidant side, eventually causing oxidative stress and even damage. During parturition, this stress increases more profoundly [14]. Either vaginal delivery or cesarean section is a kind of stress to woman, which could lead to oxidative stress response and inflammatory response. Labor is associated with increased placental oxidative stress, and women with normal VD exhibit different oxidative stress indicators than those with ECD. Previous researchers found that VD is associated with increased placental oxidative stress compared to ECD [15]. However, Mutlu et al. [31] suggest that both the mothers and neonates in the CD group are exposed to higher oxidative stress as compared with those in the normal spontaneous vaginal deliveries group. During normal pregnancy, the influx of maternal blood flow in the placenta leads to a local increase of the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS). ROS induced oxidative stress can alter embryonic development and are also correlated with adverse pregnancy outcomes, such as miscarriage, preeclampsia, preterm labor, and fetal brain injury [12]. With the increase of ROS induced oxidative stress, oxidative stress proteins like HO-1 alter at the same time. In our study, as an antioxidant and anti-inflammatory biomarker [32], HO-1 mRNA was expressed higher in ECD group (including CDMI and CDMR) than was done in VD group, and this effect may be amplified at median and high percentiles of HO-1 in women with CDMR. At the same time, hypoxia and extracellular inflammatory signals induce the intracellular accumulation ofROS [33]. NF-κB resides in the cytoplasm in an inactive complex with the inhibitor I kappa B (IκB). ROS stimuli cause reduction of IκB for proteasomal degradation and allow NF-κB to enter the nucleus, bind to DNA control elements to induce gene expression. There is no doubt that CD after anesthesia can cause numerous release of ROS. In order to keep in the oxidant-antioxidant balance, the present results support the concept that HO-1, as an antioxidant could be part of the compensatory mechanism that HO-1mRNA expressed higher in ECD group.

Inflammation closely linked with oxidative stress and interacted on each other. Obviously, maternal oxidative stress may contribute towards placental inflammation [34]. The NF-κB pathway is an important bridge to link with each other. The NF-κB pathway has been implicated in responses to oxidative stress. Phosphorylation and subsequent degradation of the IκB protein allows translocation of NF-κB to the nucleus, where it regulates gene expression. The ratio of phosphorylated IκB to total protein increased evidently with the duration of labor, reflecting activation of the NF-κB pathway. Activation of NF-κB suggests an increase of pro-inflammatory cytokines after labor. A Previous study has confirmed that TNF-α, IL-1β were all significantly increased in labored placentas compared with cesarean controls [35]. IL-1β significantly depended on the mode of delivery. Our results showed the same trend in placental IL-1β mRNA expressionbeing lower in elective cesarean section, at the median and high percentiles. It specifically shows a significant decrease at high levels in women with CDMR, reflecting the amplified effect of CDMR in the condition of a stronger and more intensive stress. It is not clear that there is an opposite relationship between ECD and VD in IL-6 mRNA expression. Since there essentially exist complex interactions among cytokines. In the class of pro-inflammatory cytokines, there may be an overall increasing trend in vaginal delivery compared with ECD but each cytokine may play its own role and thus not all pro-inflammatory cytokines express an uprising level.

As one of pro-inflammatory chemokines, IL-8 is the prototype of some chemokines, attracts polymorphonuclear leukocytes to sites of acute inflammation. IL-8 also activatesmonocytes [26]. We observed that IL-8 mRNA expression attenuate in CDMI and CDMR compared with VD almost at all percentiles. IL-1β is mainly produced by monocytes and macrophages [11, 36], and thus, there are significant associations between pro-inflammatory chemokines (like IL-8) and pro-inflammatory cytokines (such as IL-1β).

Our research has some strengths. Firstly, our study samples were much larger than previous studies, and would likely increase the statistical validity. Secondly, by using a longitudinal study design, pregnancy-related information was collected with appropriate physical examination and questionnaire surveys in all trimesters of pregnancy, allowing well control for multiple confounding variables, e.g., pregnancy-specific anxiety during the three trimesters of pregnancy and common pregnant complications. Thirdly, as there is a non-linear relationship between delivery modes and oxidative stress and inflammatory response, we have adopted quintile regression model to divide the cytokines expression into low (10th, 25th), median (50th) and high (75th, 90th) level. It has specific advantages to show the actual association at different concentration levels where this subtle relevance can’t be displayed in traditional linear regression models.

Several limitations of this study should also be noted.Although we were able to control for some prenatal confounding factors, we could not rule out the potential for residual confounding as it is impossible to fully account for all potential factors that may be associated with placental cytokines mRNA expression and delivery mode. Meanwhile, not all inflammatory and oxidative stress cytokines were examined in this study, and only representative cytokines were selected.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we have reported a high overall CD rate in this study, and caesarean delivery on maternal request is the major contributor to the high prevalence, which supports previous findings reported by Zhang et al. [5]. Maternal placental IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8 and HO-1 mRNA expressions were closely associated with delivery mode in this study, with significant differences between elective caesarean deliveryand natural delivery. The effect is much amplified at high levels of expression in women who chose CD on maternal request. Under the condition of high CD rate, especially non medically-indicated ECD contributed mainly to the high level, such difference needs to be noticed and may have important implications on obstetricians, midwives and other perinatal health care workers. Inflammatory and oxidative stress is a complex network in which every cytokine plays its own role and interacts with each other, and may influence mothers’ and infants’ health. Further research is warranted to explain the mechanism of various cytokines’ alteration patterns in different delivery modes. The effect on maternal and child health of different levels of oxidative stress and inflammatory cytokines is worth investigating and it is important to assess the short-term and long-term health outcomes caused by these delivery-mode-dependent biomarkers.

Abbreviations

BMI: 

Body mass index

CDMI: 

Cesarean delivery with medical indication

CDMR: 

Cesarean deliveryon maternal request

CI: 

Confidence interval

ECD: 

Elective caesarean delivery

GDM: 

Gestational diabetes mellitus

HDCP: 

Hypertension disorders complicating pregnancy

ICP: 

Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy

MBCS: 

Ma’anshan Birth Cohort Study

SD: 

Standard deviation

SE: 

Standard error

UCD: 

Urgent cesarean delivery

VD: 

Vaginal delivery

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors of the paper are grateful to the women who agreed to participate in theMBCSand all the obstetricians, midwives and nurses of MCH Center, Ma’anshan City, for their support in the data collection. The authors would also like to thank all respondents for their valuable contributions to this research.

Funding

This document is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China Grants (81,373,012, 81,330,068 and 81,472,991). It is also the output from Young Talents Program of Anhui Province (2014), Prominent Talents Program of Anhui Medical University (2014) and Program of Middle-and-young-aged Academic Backbone of Anhui Medical University (2013).

Availability of data and materials

The data of our cohort study will not be publicly available but will be available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

FT, KH and PZ designed the present study. YS, YX, and SY were responsible for the data collection. YH and JW took part in most of the experiment. YH carried out statistical procedures and drafted the paper. KH revised the paper critically. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethical Committee of Anhui Medical University (number: 20,131,401). All participants provided written informed consents.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University
(2)
Ma’anshan Maternal and Child Health (MCH) Center
(3)
Anhui Provincial Key Laboratory of Population Health & Aristogenics

References

  1. Blanchette H. The rising cesarean delivery rate in America: what are the consequences? Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(3):687–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Gülmezoglu AM, et al. Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007-08. Lancet. 2010;375(9713):490–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Vogel JP, Betrán AP, Vindevoghel N, et al. Use of the Robson classification to assess caesarean section trends in 21 countries: a secondary analysis of two WHO multicountry surveys. Lancet Glob Health. 2015;3(5):e260–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Xiong C, Zhou A, Cao Z, et al. Association of pre-pregnancy body mass index, gestational weight gain with cesarean section in term deliveries of China. Sci Rep. 2016;6:37168.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Zhang J, Liu Y, Meikle S, et al. Cesarean delivery on maternal request in southeast China. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111(5):1077–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Feng XL, Wang Y, An L, et al. Cesarean section in the People's Republic of China: current perspectives. Int J Womens Health. 2014;6:59–74.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Wang E. Requests for cesarean deliveries: The politics of labor pain and pain relief in Shanghai, China. Soc Sci Med. 2017;173:1–8.Google Scholar
  8. Liu X, Landon MB, Cheng W, et al. Cesarean delivery on maternal request in China: what are the risks and benefits? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(6):817.e1–9.Google Scholar
  9. Yu Y, Zhang X, Sun C, et al. Reducing the rate of cesarean delivery on maternal request through institutional and policy interventions in Wenzhou, China. PLoS One. 2017;12(11):e0186304.Google Scholar
  10. Armstrong-Wells J, Donnelly M, Post MD, et al. Inflammatory predictors of neurologic disability after preterm premature rupture of membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(2):212.e1–9.Google Scholar
  11. Joosten LA, Netea MG, Dinarello CA. Interleukin-1β in innate inflammation, autophagy and immunity. Semin Immuno. 2013;25:416–24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Al-Gubory KH, Fowler PA, Garrel C. The roles of cellular reactive oxygen species, oxidative stress and antioxidants in pregnancy outcomes. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2010;42:1634–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Malamitsi-Puchner A, Protonotariou E, Boutsikou T, et al. The influence of the mode of delivery on circulating cytokine concentrations in the perinatal period. Early Hum Dev. 2005;81(4):387–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Gitto E, Reiter RJ, Karbownik M, et al. Causes of oxidative stress in the pre-and perinatal period. Biol Neonate. 2002;81:146–57.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hung TH, Chen SF, Hsieh TT, et al. The associations between labor and delivery mode and maternal and placental oxidative stress. Reprod Toxicol. 2011;31(2):144–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Bakheit KH, Bayoumi NK, Adam I. Peripheral, placental and cord cytokines profile in spontaneous labor and elective caesarean section. Iran J Immunol. 2008;5(3):185–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Yu J, Zhou Y, Gui J, et al. Assessment of the number and function of macrophages in the placenta of gestational diabetes mellitus patients. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci. 2013;33(5):725–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Radaelli T, Varastehpour A, Catalano P, et al. Gestational diabetes induces placental genes for chronic stress and inflammatory pathways. Diabetes. 2003;52(12):2951–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Bronson SL, Bale TL. Prenatal stress-induced increases in placental inflammation and offspring hyperactivity are male-specific and ameliorated by maternal antiinflammatory treatment. Endocrinology. 2014;155(7):2635–46.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Xiao LM, Tao FB, Zhang JL, et al. Design of pregnancy - related anxiety scale and reliability evaluation. Chin J Public Health. 2012;28(3):275–7.Google Scholar
  21. Yadav AK, Chaudhari H, Warke H, et al. Differential expression of Collectins in human placenta and role in inflammation during spontaneous labor. PLoS One. 2014;9(10):e108815.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Latendresse G, Ruiz RJ, Wong B. Psychological distress and SSRI use predict variation in inflammatory cytokines during pregnancy. Open J ObstetGynecol. 2013;3(1A):184–91.Google Scholar
  23. Girard S, Heazell AE, Derricott H, et al. Circulating cytokines and alarmins associated with placental inflammation in high-risk pregnancies. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2014;72(4):422–34.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Chatterjee P, Chiasson VL, Seerangan G, et al. Combined treatment with IL-4 and IL-10 modulates immune cells and prevents hypertension in pregnant mice. Am J Hypertens. 2015;28(1):135–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Lappas M. GSK3β is increased in adipose tissue and skeletal muscle from women with gestational diabetes where it regulates the inflammatory response. PLoS One. 2014;9(12):e115854.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Charo IF, Ransohoff RM. The many roles of chemokines and chemokine receptors in inflammation. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(6):610–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Huang K, Tao F, Faragher B, et al. A mixed-method study of factors associated with differences in caesarean section rates at community level: the case of rural China. Midwifery. 2013;29(8):911–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhao J, Liu XJ, Ma JW, et al. DNA damage in healthy term neonate. Early Hum Dev. 2004;77(1–2):89–98.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Keelan JA, Marvin KW, Sato TA, et al. Cytokine abundance in placental tissues: evidence of inflammatory activation in gestational membranes with term and preterm parturition. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;181(6):1530–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Gedikbaşi A, Salihoğlu Ö, Çankaya A, et al. The evaluation of cord blood interleukin-1β levels in normal and caesarean deliveries. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2014;33(12):1193–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Mutlu B, Aksoy N, Cakir H, et al. The effects of the mode of delivery on oxidative-antioxidative balance. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011;24(11):1367–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Ozen M, Zhao H, Lewis DB, et al. Hemeoxygenase and the immune system in normal and pathological pregnancies. Front Pharmacol. 2015;6:84.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Zerón HM, Flores AP, Chávez AA, et al. Pregnancy weight gainlimitation by a supervised nutritional program influences placental NF-κB/IKK complexexpression and oxidative stress. Oman Med J. 2013;28(3):167–72.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Aye IL, Waddell BJ, Mark PJ, et al. Oxysterols exert proinflammatory effects in placental trophoblasts via TLR4-dependent, cholesterol-sensitive activation of NF-κB. Mol Hum Reprod. 2012;18(7):341–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Cindrova-Davies T, Yung HW, Johns J, et al. Oxidative stress, gene expression, and protein changes induced in the human placenta during labor. Am J Pathol. 2007;171(4):1168–79.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Offner H, Subramanian S, Parker SM, et al. Experimental stroke induces massive, rapid activation of the peripheral immune system. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2006;26(5):654–65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement