Skip to main content

Nutrition and diet myths, knowledge and practice during pregnancy and lactation among a sample of Egyptian pregnant women: a cross-sectional study

Abstract

Background

Globally, the burden of maternal malnutrition remains an enormous public health problem; malnourished pregnant women are at increased risk of having low-birth-weight (LBW) infants. Several reports suggest a possible association between malnutrition among lactating mothers and the production of smaller quantities of breast milk. Many women have incorrect nutrition knowledge during pregnancy due to false beliefs derived from popular practices. Our study was conducted to assess nutritional knowledge, myths, and practices among Egyptian women during pregnancy and lactation.

Methodology

A pretested 2-page interview questionnaire was used to collect data from the study participants after written informed consent was obtained from them after clarification of the study’s aim. Obstetrics and gynecology experts collected the data from pregnant females who agreed to participate in private and university hospital antenatal care clinics in Cairo, Egypt.

Results

A total of 468 pregnant females completed the interview questionnaire. The mean knowledge score was 5 ± 3, with a median score of 5 and an IQR of 3–7, and the mean holding myths score was 3 ± 2, with a median score of 2 and an IQR of 2–4. Regarding the correct answers to the knowledge questions, more than 70% of the participants correctly answered that during the first six months of life, breast milk is the only food a baby requires, and less than 20% of them correctly answered that caffeine consumption could provoke premature birth. Regarding the holding myths questions, more than half of the participants held the myth that drinking moghat and helba increases the breast milk supply. We found that the most common source of knowledge during pregnancy and lactation among the participants was family and friends’ advice (60%), followed by others (doctors, previous education in school or university) (45%).

Conclusion

Among a sample of Egyptian women, more than half held at least one myth about nutrition and diet during pregnancy and breastfeeding, so health education at antenatal outpatient clinics should be directed toward those myths to correct them. Older women with sufficient family income showed significantly higher knowledge scores than others.

Peer Review reports

Background

Globally, the burden of maternal malnutrition remains a substantial public health problem, with approximately 10% of women being undernourished [1]. A systematic review from Africa revealed that the overall pooled prevalence of maternal undernutrition was 20% [2].

The World Health Organization defines malnutrition as ‘the cellular imbalance between the supply of nutrients and energy and the body’s demand for them to ensure specific functions, growth, and maintenance of the body [3].

Previous research has shown that pregnant women who are undernourished have a higher chance of giving birth to low birth weight babies. Numerous studies have shown a connection between LBW and malnutrition, stunted growth and development, and higher rates of morbidity and mortality in children. This connection between LBW and poor health and nutritional outcomes later in life is also well documented [4]. Furthermore, there is evidence linking inadequate nutrition during pregnancy—particularly inadequacies in specific vitamins and minerals—to unfavorable outcomes for both the mother and the fetus. Preterm labor, inadequate anthropometric measurements, and birth asphyxia have all been associated with severe iron deficiency anemia. There are few studies on the effects of maternal malnutrition during lactation. According to a number of publications, there may be a connection between breastfeeding moms’ malnutrition and reduced milk supply as well as low levels of B vitamins, vitamin A, and important fatty acids [4].

Pregnant women’s malnutrition was caused by a number of factors that were collected from the research, including access to food, dietary taboos, poverty, and inadequate nutritional information—all of which continued to be significant obstacles for mothers and families [5].

Pregnant women’s nutritional knowledge and practice are important prerequisites for their proper nutritional intake. The antenatal period with opportunities for regular contact with health professionals appears to be the ideal time and setting to institute interventions that could maximize pregnant women’s outcomes and those of their babies by motivating them to make nutritional changes [6]. Many women are misinformed about pregnancy diet because of myths propagated by common practices. The conventional sources of knowledge regarding diet during pregnancy are insufficient to dispel the myths developed by traditions [7].

There is a clear need to provide dietary guidance during prenatal care and breastfeeding, and this guidance could be more effective if it takes myths into account. Because of the misconceptions and lack of information that surround diet in pregnancy and breastfeeding. This study was conducted to assess nutritional knowledge, myths, and practices among pregnant women. To our knowledge, no studies have been found in the literature measuring nutrition-related knowledge and myths among pregnant Egyptian women. The aim of our study was to explore the frequency of correct dietary knowledge and myths among pregnant women, to determine the frequency of correct dietary knowledge and myths among pregnant women, to define pregnant women´s source of dietary knowledge, and to find the relationship between correct dietary knowledge, myths, and sociodemographic characteristics of pregnant women.

Methods

Study design

An observational cross-sectional analytical study.

Sample type

Convenient sample (easy access).

Sample size and sampling technique

The sample size was 460, calculated using www.openepi.com, in view of a study performed in which 46% of the pregnant women had a myth score less than the mean [8]. The confidence interval was 95%, and the nonresponse rate was assumed to be 20% with a power of 80%. We used the following equation: Sample size n = [DEFF*Np(1-p)]/ [(d2/Z21-α/2*(N-1) + p*(1-p)].

The participants’ inclusion criteria were Egyptian, pregnant, aged 21 years or older, married with no history of medical disorders, and willing to participate.

Data collection tool

A pretested 2-page interview questionnaire was used to collect data from the study participants. It included four sections:

  1. i)

    Questions assessing the social level of the family in Egypt: education, occupation, family size, residence, and income [9].

  2. ii)

    Personal and obstetric history: age, age at first pregnancy, age at marriage, parity, gravidity, ANC provider facility, following regular ANC visits, and presence of chronic diseases.

  3. iii)

    Knowledge and myths questions: Seven questions of myths and 10 questions of knowledge. These questions were obtained from a previous study conducted in Mexico [8]. With some modifications according to the Egyptian situation.

The questions were translated by two language experts into Arabic and back translated to English by another two independent language experts. Pilot testing of the final questionnaire was performed on 15 participants to ensure the clarity of the questions. The results of the pilot study were not added to the results. The Cronbach’s alpha reliability test was performed for the knowledge and myths question scales. The scales were internally consistent, with Cronbach’s alpha values of 0.819 and 0.745, respectively.

Data collection technique

Obstetrics and gynecology experts collected the data from pregnant females who agreed to participate after written informed consent was obtained from them after clarification of the study’s aim in a private clinic and university hospital ANC clinic in Cairo, Egypt. The private clinic was open three days a week from 1 pm to 7 pm and served females of high socioeconomic level. The public ANC clinic of the university hospital was opened every day from 9 am to 3 pm except Friday and served females of middle and low socioeconomic levels. Five hundred pregnant women were assessed for eligibility, and 32 pregnant women were excluded: 14 did not meet the inclusion criteria, 6 did not consent and 12 refused to complete the questionnaire. Finally, 468 pregnant women were included in the study and completed the questionnaire.

Statistical analysis

All the collected data were revised for completeness and logical consistency. The data were extracted from Google Forms to Microsoft Office Excel Software Program, 2019, and then transferred and analyzed into the Statistical Package of Social Science Software program, version 26 (SPSS) for statistical analysis. Mean, SD, median, and IQR were calculated for knowledge score and myths score, and then participants were categorized into 2 groups according to the median score for knowledge and for myths into above and below median score [8]. Comparisons between categories and sociodemographic charterers of the participants were performed using chi-square and Mann‒Whitney U tests accordingly, where a significant p value was p ≤ 0.05.

Results

A total of 468 pregnant women completed the interview questionnaire. The mean age was 29 ± 7 years with a median age of 29 years and an IQR of (24–33). The mean age at marriage was 21 ± 4 years, and the mean age at first pregnancy was 22 ± 4 years. As shown in Table 1, more than 80% of the females had less than a university education and more than 60% of their husbands had less than a university education. Regarding occupation, approximately 75% of the females were not working, and only 5% of their husbands were not working. Approximately 65% of these families’ income was just enough, and less than a quarter of these families (23.1%) were living in houses with a crowding index greater than 2.

Table 1 Sociodemographic characteristics of Egyptian pregnant female participants (n = 468):

The mean knowledge score was 5 ± 3 with a median score of 5 and an IQR of 3–7, and the mean holding myths score was 3 ± 2 with a median of 2 and an IQR of 2–4.

Figure 1 illustrates the correct answers to the knowledge questions. More than 70% of the participants correctly answered that breast milk is the only food a baby requires during the first six months of life, and less than 20% answered correctly that caffeine consumption provokes premature birth.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Percentage distribution of females answering the knowledge statements correctly

1-Caffeine consumption provokes premature birth

2-Folic acid intake should begin before not only during pregnancy

3-Gestational diabetes increases future risk of type 2 diabetes

4-The mother requires an adequate increased energy intake during pregnancy and nursing

5-Obesity during pregnancy can cause hypertension and the risk of preeclampsia

6-A mother should consume approximately 3 L of water per day while nursing

7-A healthy diet and lifestyle during pregnancy prevent future diseases in a child

8-For successful breastfeeding, a baby must latch on to the nipple and use suction to feed

9-The fetus receives vitamins, proteins, and minerals from what the mother eats

10-During the first six months of life, breast milk is the only food a baby requires

Figure 2 illustrates the holding myths questions; more than half of the participants held the myth that drinking moghat and helba increases the breast milk supply.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Percent distribution of participants who held myths

1-Vomiting cannot be controlled during pregnancy

2-It is impossible to recover one’s prebaby weight after childbirth

3-You cannot exercise during pregnancy

4-An angry mother should not nurse her baby

5-You must eat for two during pregnancy

6-Not satisfying cravings leave a mark on the body of the newborn

7-You should drink moghat and helba to increase the breast milk supply

Figure 3 shows that the most common sources of knowledge regarding pregnancy and lactation among the participants were family and friends’ advice (60%), followed by others (doctors, previous education in school or university) (45%).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Percent distribution of the main source of knowledge the participants trusted for knowledge related to pregnancy and lactation

When we compared the knowledge score and sociodemographic characteristics of the participants, we found that participants with older age and sufficient family income showed significantly higher knowledge scores than others (p value 0.002, < 0.001, respectively). No other significant difference was found between the sociodemographic characteristics of the participants, and either the knowledge or the myths scores (Table 2). It is also shown in Table 2 that women with higher median knowledge were more common among women with higher gravida when the wife and husband were educated more than a university education, and among those who lived in urban residences. The higher median holding myths were among women with low gravida, educated below university for wife and husband, who live in rural residences, and with a higher crowding index.

Table 2 Comparison between sociodemographic characteristics of the participants and the knowledge, and myths scores

Table 3 shows the practice of nine knowledge and myths statements. Approximately 45% of the women practiced drinking moghat and helba to increase their breast milk supply, and 40% satisfied the cravings during pregnancy and consumed more than 3 L of water per day while nursing. More than half were practicing breastfeeding for their infants and ensuring good latch on of the baby.

Table 3 Practices toward knowledge and myths among participants (n = 468)

Discussion

Pregnant women must maintain a sufficient nutritional level for both their health and the success of their pregnancy. Due to increased nutritional requirements, pregnancy is a critical period for meeting the body’s demand for macro/micronutrients. Worldwide, 53.8 million pregnant women suffer from common micronutrient deficiencies such as anemia and vitamin A deficiency (VAD). In addition to inadequate nutrition, social and psychological factors, women’ nutritional awareness, and biological changes that affect how they perceive their eating habits during pregnancy all have an impact on maternal malnutrition [3].

Breastfeeding is very important to human infants (aged ≤ 12 months) and young children (aged 12–36 months), as it promotes healthy brain development and is essential for preventing the triple burden of malnutrition, infectious diseases, and mortality, while also reducing the risk of obesity and chronic diseases in later life in low-income and high-income countries alike. Breastfeeding also helps to protect the mother against chronic diseases, including breast and ovarian cancers, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease [11].

Antenatal care refers to the follow-up care that pregnant women receive to ensure the greatest possible health for both the mother and the fetus. This care includes education, counseling, screening, and treatment. One of the most important things in preventing women’s deaths from avoidable causes of maternal death is health awareness [12].

Education is an important component of prenatal care, particularly for women who are pregnant for the first time. Numerous studies have revealed that educated women experience better pregnancy outcomes than uneducated women and that prenatal education can help to lower the risk of difficulties during pregnancy and delivery [13].

Comprehensive and integrated antenatal care should include nutrition education, to obtain optimal health status for both the mother and child [14].

Myths about nutrition and diet during pregnancy and lactation

The present study is one of the first to provide information on the myths and knowledge of pregnant Egyptians regarding nutrition and diet during pregnancy and lactation. We found that more than half of the participants held at least one myth about nutrition and diet during pregnancy and breastfeeding. 44% believed that not satisfying cravings leave a mark on the body of the newborn during pregnancy, and 40% of our participants would act upon this myth regardless of their educational level, while another study on pregnant Mexicans found that, lower educational attainment was associated with.

holding and acting upon myth [8]. This study also found that younger participants, The belief that “a frightened or angry mother should not nurse a baby” was most prevalent among women with the lowest levels of education, the lowest socioeconomic status, and fewer prior pregnancies, whereas in our study, 40% of the participants believed that, but only 25.9% believed that [8]. Weir.

Z. et al. performed a qualitative study of the myths of overweight and obese pregnant women and reported that the myth “you cannot exercise during pregnancy” was associated with a low socioeconomic level while our study revealed that, 37.4% believed that and 23.1% indeed were not practicing exercise regardless of their socioeconomic level [15]. According to Marshall et al., pregnant women in a rural community in the southeast United States typically do not engage in physical activity because they feel that their everyday activities provide enough exercise. While some felt that physical exercise puts both mother and child at risk for injury, others felt that rest is more vital than physical activity [16]. In contrast to pregnant Maasai women in Tanzania, during the second and third trimesters, they will gradually increase the amount of daily chores they have to perform until they become exhausted. They will also neglect their prenatal checkups in order to prepare for their postnatal period, during which they will remain in their homes for three months [17]. Nonetheless, Atif et al. found that 76.4% of respondents in Pakistan thought that light to moderate weight lifting was a cause of miscarriage [18].

During lactation, 53.2% thought that drinking moghat and helba could increase the breast milk supply and 44.9% were already practicing that.

Knowledge

In our study, participants with older age and with enough family income showed significantly higher knowledge scores than others, and the reason may be due.

to the fact that older women have more experience. Generalized Egyptian beliefs were prevalent among our study population, which included the idea that the fetus receives vitamins, proteins, and minerals from the mother’s diet and that breast milk is the only nourishment a baby needs during the first six months of life. However, in a community-based qualitative cross-sectional study, that was conducted between April and May 2022 among the rural Acholi communities in Northern Uganda or newborns, they found that most mothers believed that breast milk is given exclusively in the first two months. However, some mothers, introduce sugar solution, black tea, and soup immediately after birth [19].

We also want to draw attention to the fact that, although two-thirds of study women from the Middle East used folic acid, only 47% of our participants took it before or throughout pregnancy [20].

In January/February 2022, a cross-sectional questionnaire-based real-world research was carried out in Vietnam with 200 pregnant women and 100 preconception women. Out of 300 respondents, 62% had scores indicating a high likelihood of limited health literacy, 33% had scores indicating possibly limited health literacy, and only 5% (16 respondents) had adequate health literacy. Only 23% of respondents with limited health literacy were currently using folic acid/folate supplements, whereas 39% of those with possibly limited health literacy were using folic acid/folate supplements (p < 0.05). This indicates that folic acid administration before and during pregnancy is insufficient even in other countries [21].

Other studies reported that most women know that they should take folic acid but do not know exactly how folic acid could benefit them and their babies (e.g., prevention of neural tube defects) [22].

We did notice and would like to highlight, that only 31% of our participants knew that gestational diabetes increases the future risk of type 2 diabetes. Another study showed that 80% of their study participants knew about this increased risk [8], which reflects the magnitude of the lack of knowledge among Egyptian women. We think that this lack of knowledge may prevent women from seeking professional advice for improving their diet and lifestyle on time to delay or prevent the onset of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Sources of nutritional knowledge

Our research revealed that the participants’ most frequent sources of information about pregnancy and lactation were advice from family and friends (60%) and others (doctors, previous education in school or university) (45%) respectively.

However, according to a different Vietnamese survey, healthcare professionals (77%), family or friends (47%), and websites (36%), were the most reliable sources of information about nutrition [21].

Implications

Generally, pregnant, and lactating women tend to modify their diet according to myths and knowledge transmitted from their family and friends, who were the main source of knowledge among our participants to improve their health and that of their children. However, they often implement these modifications without the guidance of a nutrition or health specialist, as reported by Pinheiro [23]. This circumstance offers perinatal healthcare providers an opportunity to enhance the nutrition and gestational weight gain of their patients, particularly younger patients with less expertise, by implementing appropriate intervention programs. It is crucial that dieticians and other medical experts take on the responsibility of dispelling misconceptions about nutrition and diet during pregnancy and lactation. Finally, it is essential to highlight that nutritional guidance for pregnant women will require not only the transmission of knowledge but also the interpretation of information within the context of certain.

culturally rooted beliefs [24].

Our study’s limitations were its convenient sample and that it is a single-center study, so a randomized study that includes different areas in Egypt with large is needed for a better assessment of nutritional knowledge, myths, and practices among Egyptian women during pregnancy and lactation.

Conclusion

Among a sample of Egyptian women, more than half held at least one myth about nutrition and diet during pregnancy and breastfeeding, so health education at antenatal outpatient clinics should be directed toward those myths to correct them, and improve the nutritional status of pregnant Egyptians. Older women with sufficient family income showed significantly higher knowledge scores than others.

Data availability

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are attached in the supplementary material section.

Abbreviations

ANC:

Antenatal care

LBW:

Low-birth-weight

References

  1. Di Cesare M, Bentham J, Stevens GA, Zhou B, Danaei G, Lu Y, Bixby H, Cowan MJ, Riley LM, Hajifathalian K, Fortunato L. Trends in adult body-mass index in 200 countries from 1975 to 2014: a pooled analysis of 1698 population-based measurement studies with 19.2 million participants. Lancet. 2016;387(10026).

  2. Plb PL, Ack AC, Jyl JL. Prevalence and determinants of maternal malnutrition in Africa: a systematic review. ARC J Gynecol Obstet. 2020;5(1):1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Serbesa ML, Iffa MT, Geleto M. Factors associated with malnutrition among pregnant women and lactating mothers in Miesso Health Center, Ethiopia. Eur J Midwifery. 2019;3.

  4. Gebre B, Biadgilign S, Taddese Z, Legesse T, Letebo M. Determinants of malnutrition among pregnant and lactating women under humanitarian setting in Ethiopia. BMC Nutr. 2018;4:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bhanbhro S, Kamal T, Diyo RW, Lipoeto NI, Soltani H. Factors affecting maternal nutrition and health: a qualitative study in a matrilineal community in Indonesia. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(6):e0234545.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Teweldemedhin LG, Amanuel HG, Berhe SA, Gebreyohans G, Tsige Z, Habte E. Effect of nutrition education by health professionals on pregnancy-specific nutrition knowledge and healthy dietary practice among pregnant women in Asmara, Eritrea: a quasi-experimental study. BMJ Nutr Prev Health. 2021;4(1):181.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Guggino A, Barbero S, Ponzo V, Viora E, Durazzo M, Bo S. Myths about nutrition in pregnancy. J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;36(7):964–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sámano R, Lara-Cervantes C, Martínez-Rojano H, Chico-Barba G, Sánchez-Jiménez B, Lokier O, Hernández-Trejo M, Grosso JM, Heller S. Dietary knowledge and myths vary by age and years of schooling in pregnant mexico city residents. Nutrients. 2020;12(2):362.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Fahmy SI, Nofal LM, Shehata SF, El Kady HM, Ibrahim HK. Updating indicators for scaling the socioeconomic level of families for health research. J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 2015;90(1):1–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. World Health Organization (WHO). Household crowding –WHO Housing and Health Guidelines –NCBI Bookshelf. WHO. 2018. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK535289/. Accessed July 15, 2023.

  11. Pérez-Escamilla R, Tomori C, Hernández-Cordero S, Baker P, Barros AJ, Bégin F, Chapman DJ, Grummer-Strawn LM, McCoy D, Menon P, Neves PA. Breastfeeding: crucially important, but increasingly challenged in a market-driven world. Lancet. 2023;401(10375):472–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jibril UN, Saleh GN, Badaki O, Anyebe EE, Umar A, Kamal A. Health education intervention on knowledge and accessibility of pregnant women to antenatal care services in Edu, Kwara State, Nigeria. Int J Womens Health Reprod Sci. 2018;6(2):154–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Al-Ateeq MA, Al-Rusaiess AA. Health education during antenatal care: the need for more. Int J women’s health 2015 Feb 18:239–42.

  14. Rahmawati W, van der Pligt P, Worsley A, Willcox JC. Indonesian antenatal nutrition education: a qualitative study of healthcare professional views. Women’s Health. 2021;17:17455065211066077.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Weir Z, Bush J, Robson SC, McParlin C, Rankin J, Bell R. Physical activity in pregnancy: a qualitative study of the beliefs of overweight and obese pregnant women. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010;10(1):1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Marshall ES, Bland H, Melton B. Perceived barriers to physical activity among pregnant women living in a rural community. Public Health Nurs. 2013;30(4):361–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/phn.12006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lennox J, Petrucka P, Bassendowski S. Eating practices during pregnancy: perceptions of select maasai women in Northern Tanzania. Global Health Res Policy. 2017;2(1):1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Atif K, Naqvi SS, SA HN, Ehsan K, Niazi SA, Javed A. Reproductive health issues in Pakistan; do myths take precedence over medical evidence? J Pak Med Assoc. 2017;67(8):1232–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Acire PV, Bagonza A, Opiri N. The misbeliefs and food taboos during pregnancy and early infancy: a pitfall to attaining adequate maternal and child nutrition outcomes among the rural Acholi communities in Northern Uganda.2023.

  20. Bener A, Al Maadid MG, Al-Bast DA, Al-Marri S. Maternal knowledge, attitude and practice on folic acid intake among arabian Qatari women. Reprod Toxicol. 2006;21(1):21–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Le QT, Huynh NK, Hoang TD. Awareness of Nutrition and supplements among pregnant and Preconception women: a real-world study in Vietnam. Women’s Health Rep. 2023;4(1):506–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Al Rakaf MS, Kurdi AM, Ammari AN, Al Hashem AM, Shoukri MM, Garne E, Majeed-Saidan MA. Patterns of folic acid use in pregnant Saudi women and prevalence of neural tube defects—results from a nested case–control study. Prev Med Rep. 2015;2:572–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Pinheiro J, Seabra D. Changes of food habits during pregnancy and breast-feeding. Acta Med Port. 2008;21(2):149–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nguyen PH, Sanghvi T, Tran LM, Afsana K, Mahmud Z, Aktar B, Haque R, Menon P. The nutrition and health risks faced by pregnant adolescents: insights from a cross-sectional study in Bangladesh. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(6):e0178878.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MMZ and MA wrote the conception and design of the studyData collection was accomplished by AS, BE, and HMData analysis and interpretation were made by MMZStatistical analysis was made by MMZMA and MMZ prepared the manuscript AS, BE and HM were responsible for the recruitment of patientsAll authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marwa Abdalla.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol was approved by the scientific committee at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, and was approved by the Ethical Committee from the Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University (N-91-2022) in October 2022. Ethical approval is attached as related manuscript file. Verbal informed consent was obtained from the study participants before the interview and after clarification of the study aim. Only those who agreed to participate were included. All procedures for data collection were treated with confidentiality according to the Helsinki Declaration of Biomedical Ethics. Participants were informed that this was an anonymous survey, and that participation was voluntary.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary Material 2

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abdalla, M., Zein, M.M., Sherif, A. et al. Nutrition and diet myths, knowledge and practice during pregnancy and lactation among a sample of Egyptian pregnant women: a cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 24, 140 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06331-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06331-3

Keywords