Skip to main content
Download PDF

SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy and the risk of adverse maternal outcomes in the Republic of Georgia: a national birth registry-based cohort study

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth volume 24, Article number: 156 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Georgia experienced an increase in maternal deaths (MD) during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, which warrants further investigation. This study aimed to assess associations between timing of SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy and MD, post-delivery intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and caesarean section (CS) delivery.

Methods

We performed a national birth registry-based cohort study of pregnant women who had completed 22 weeks of gestation and delivered between February 28, 2020, and August 31, 2022. The data were linked to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) testing, vital, and immunization registries. Pregnant women were classified into three groups: confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection from conception through 31 days before delivery; confirmed infection within 30 days before or at delivery; and women negative for SARS-CoV-2 infection or without any test results (reference group). Multivariable logistic regression was used to calculate the adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

Among 111,493 pregnant women, 16,751 had confirmed infection during pregnancy, and 7,332 were fully vaccinated against COVID-19 before delivery. Compared to the reference group, those with confirmed infection within 30 days before or at delivery experienced increased odds of MD (aOR: 43.11, 95% CI, 21.99–84.55), post-delivery ICU admission (aOR: 5.20, 95% CI, 4.05–6.67), and CS delivery (aOR: 1.11, 95% CI, 1.03–1.20).

Conclusions

Pregnant women in Georgia with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection within 30 days before or at delivery experienced a considerably higher risk of MD and post-delivery ICU admission and a slightly higher risk for CS delivery. Additionally, the results highlighted that most pregnant women were not vaccinated against COVID-19. These findings should alert stakeholders that adherence to public health preventive measures needs to be improved.

Peer Review reports

Background

At the onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), uncertainty existed regarding potential risks to pregnant women [1, 2]. Comprehensive evidence suggests pregnant women are a vulnerable group with an increased risk of adverse health outcomes following SARS-CoV-2 infection [3,4,5]. However, significant differences among nations in healthcare sector performance, testing policies, reporting accuracy, and adherence to preventive measures, including vaccination, impacted the official numbers of SARS-CoV-2 infected cases and complicate cross-country comparisons of the impact on population health. Moreover, studies on the adverse effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnant women have shown varying results owing to differences in study design, selection criteria for study groups, definitions of infections, and detection methods. The most recent evidence indicates that infection during pregnancy increases the risk of pregnancy complications (preterm delivery, caesarean section [CS] delivery, and intensive care unit [ICU] admission) and adverse outcomes (mortality and stillbirth) for both mothers and newborns [4, 6,7,8]. However, large representative studies on the health effects among pregnant women with and without SARS-CoV-2 infection are limited, and few have investigated the importance of the timing of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Studies that stratified mothers by the timing of infection did not present results on maternal outcomes in the different groups or lack a control group of non-infected women [9].

The first confirmed case of COVID-19 in the Republic of Georgia, a middle-income country, was detected on February 26, 2020. Despite a rapid national pandemic response, COVID-19 cases increased exponentially, and in December 2020, Georgia recorded the highest incidence in Europe [10, 11]. Georgia faced several waves of infection in 2021, the largest of which occurred between January and March 2022. Antenatal care (ANC) and delivery services were considered as essential health services that were to be provided without interruption during the pandemic. Improving maternal and newborn health has been a priority for Georgian public health authorities, who proposed a long-term strategy in 2017 to reduce the maternal mortality (MM) ratio to 12 per 100,000 live births by 2030 [12]. However, MM surged during the pandemic, with MM ratios increasing from 28.9 per 100,000 live births in 2019 to 71.8 per 100,000 live births in 2021 [13]. Georgia implemented mandatory SARS-CoV-2 testing during ANC and delivery. Although the country has several high-quality national health registries, no study has utilized these resources to assess whether pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infection experience an increased risk of adverse maternal outcomes compared to non-infected pregnant women. We hypothesized that women with SARS-CoV-2 infection close to or at delivery have a higher risk of adverse maternal outcomes than non-infected women and women with SARS-CoV-2 infection earlier in pregnancy. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the risk of maternal death (MD), post-delivery ICU admission, and CS delivery in relation to SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy among women who had attained a gestational age (GA) of ≥ 22 weeks at the time of delivery.

Materials and methods

Data sources

The Georgian Birth Registry (GBR), a nationwide medical birth registry established in 2016 [14], registers all information during ANC, delivery, and subsequent hospital stay for mothers and newborns, and it covered 99.8% of all pregnancies in Georgia in 2021 [13,14,15]. The LabCov registry, launched in April 2020, electronically records the results of SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic tests, encompassing serological tests (antigen) and molecular tests (reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction), conducted by both private and state laboratories throughout the country. Individuals are registered with LabCov during sample collection and test results must be entered within 24 h of their availability [16, 17]. From June 2020, all pregnant women admitted to birth centers or hospitals were routinely tested for SARS-CoV-2 [17]. Pregnant women in Georgia have eight free-of-charge ANC visits in GA weeks < 13, 18, 26, 30, 34, 36, and 38 [18]. From October 2021, routine testing of pregnant women during ANC visits was implemented. The Immunization Electronic Module, implemented in 2019, registers all vaccinations performed in the country. The Vital Registration System records all deaths in the country and is considered highly complete with 100% coverage. The details of these national digital registration systems administered by the healthcare sector are described elsewhere [14, 15, 19].

Study population

Given our hypothesis that SARS-CoV-2 infection close to or at the time of delivery increases the risk of adverse maternal outcomes, we included data from all women who had attained GA week ≥ 22 at the time of delivery, as recorded in the GBR. This inclusion criterion was based on the international classification of abortion and delivery [20]. Our study included all women registered in the GBR who delivered between February 28, 2020, and August 31, 2022, totaling 111,493 individuals.

Exposure and covariates

Information regarding the testing and confirmation of SARS-CoV-2 infection status during pregnancy was obtained from LabCov. Pregnant women were then classified into three exposure groups: no confirmed infection during pregnancy (reference group), which included SARS-CoV-2-negative women and those with no recorded test results; confirmed infection from conception to 31 days before delivery; and confirmed infection within 30 days before or at delivery. The threshold of 30 days was chosen based on previous studies indicating that the virus takes an average of 30 days to clear from the body after a positive test result [21, 22]. Only the positive test result was considered in women with multiple confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections during pregnancy.

We extracted information about relevant covariates, including sociodemographic characteristics (maternal age, education, and residency), BMI at the first ANC visit, obstetric history (plurality, adherence to ANC, and gestational diabetes), and GA at delivery, from the GBR. Education was classified as primary, secondary, higher, or unknown and residence was categorized as rural or urban. BMI at the first ANC visit was divided into four groups (18.5 kg/m2, 18.5–24.9 kg/m2, 25–30 kg/m2, and > 30 kg/m2). Most obstetric history covariates were dichotomized (parity as primiparous or multiparous, plurality as singleton or multiple, and adherence to ANC and gestational diabetes as yes or no), but GA at delivery was divided into four groups (preterm ≤ 36 weeks; early term 37–38 weeks; full term 39–40 weeks; late term ≥ 41 weeks). Being fully vaccinated against COVID-19 was defined as receiving two full doses of vaccine either before SARS-CoV-2 infection (for women with confirmed infection) or at any time during pregnancy (for those with no confirmed infection). SARS-CoV-2 testing prior to pregnancy was limited to high-risk groups, specific professions, contacts, or those with a strong suspicion of infection, leading to inconsistent data on pre-pregnancy infection status. Consequently, this variable was omitted from the analysis owing to its unsystematic collection.

Outcomes

There were three main maternal outcomes in this study: MD, post-delivery ICU admission, and CS delivery. The standard definition of MD is a death at any time during pregnancy and up to 42 days after pregnancy termination [20]. In this study, we restricted the definition to the death of a pregnant woman who had attained a GA of 22 weeks and up to 42 days after delivery, since delivery was a prerequisite for our study hypothesis. Information on MD was extracted from the Vital Registration System, and information on maternal post-delivery ICU admission and CS delivery was extracted from the GBR. Post-delivery ICU admission was defined as any admission to the ICU (within or outside the location of the birthing facility) after delivery, and CS deliveries included both elective and emergency CS deliveries.

Statistical analyses

All statistical analyses were performed using STATA, version 17 (StataCorp, TX, USA). Nominal data are presented as frequencies and percentages. Continuous variables are presented as means and standard deviations.

Logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the association of SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy with MD, post-delivery ICU admission, and CS delivery. Directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) were used to identify possible confounding factors in the assumed causal pathways between SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy and MD, post-delivery ICU admission, and CS delivery. The relationships depicted between the variables included in the DAGs were based on previous literature and underlying theories (details in Supplementary material). Based on the DAGs, MD models were adjusted for age, education, BMI at the first ANC visit, parity, gestational diabetes, and COVID-19 vaccination status; post-delivery ICU admission models were adjusted for age, BMI at the first ANC visit, gestational diabetes, and COVID-19 vaccination status; and CS delivery models were adjusted for age, education, BMI at the first ANC visit, parity, and gestational diabetes (Supplementary Figs. 1–3). We also performed a sensitivity analysis for post-delivery ICU admission by excluding MDs and women who underwent CS delivery. Moreover, to ensure that the inclusion of women with no recorded SARS-CoV-2 test results did not bias the results, we performed additional sensitivity analyses in which we restricted the models for all three outcomes to women with recorded SARS-CoV-2 test results in LabCov during pregnancy (Supplementary Table 1). All results are presented as crude and adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

Among 111,493 pregnant women who gave birth in Georgia from February 28, 2020, to August 31, 2022, 13,800 (12.4%) had confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in early pregnancy (from conception through 31 days before delivery), and 2,915 (2.6%) had confirmed infection within 30 days before or at delivery.

Majority of the investigated characteristics showed similarities across the three exposure groups; the mean maternal age was approximately 29 years for all groups, most had secondary education, attended ANC, delivered at full term, and were not fully vaccinated against COVID-19 (Table 1). However, both groups of women with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection tended to have certain characteristics more frequently than those in the reference group. These characteristics included a higher likelihood of attaining a higher education level, living in urban areas, attending ANC, being primiparous, and being fully vaccinated against COVID-19. Gestational diabetes was rare and was equally distributed across the exposure groups.

Table 1 Characteristics of pregnant women by SARS-CoV-2 infection status. The Georgian Birth Registry, February 28, 2020- August 30, 2022
Full size table

In total, 39 women died during the study period. Of these, 23 (59%) had confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy, and none were fully vaccinated. Among the 649 women admitted to the post-delivery ICU, 37 (5.7%) were fully vaccinated. Women with SARS-CoV-2 infection within 30 days before or at delivery were more likely to experience MD (0.75% vs. 0.02%) and post-delivery ICU admission (2.57% vs. 0.54%) than those in the reference group (Table 2). Furthermore, compared to the reference group, both groups of women with confirmed infection had a higher likelihood of CS delivery (44.8% and 45.9% vs. 41.9%, Table 2).

Table 2 Unadjusted and aORs and 95% CIs for the association between SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy and maternal death, post-delivery intensive care unit admission, and caesarean section delivery
Full size table

After adjusting for confounding factors, the odds of MD were almost 43 times higher among women with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection within 30 days before or at delivery compared to the reference group (aOR, 43.11; 95% CI, 21.99–84.55). In contrast, women with confirmed infection in early pregnancy did not experience higher odds of MD than the reference group (aOR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.06–3.59). The odds of post-delivery ICU admission were five times higher among women with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection within 30 days before or at delivery (aOR, 5.20; 95% CI, 4.05–6.67) compared to the reference group, whereas women with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in early pregnancy had odds of post-delivery ICU admission that were similar to those in the reference group (aOR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.71–1.21). Notably, the increased odds of post-delivery ICU admission in women with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection within 30 days before or at delivery remained high after the exclusion of women with the outcomes of MD (aOR, 4.44; 95% CI, 3.37–5.88) and CS delivery (aOR, 5.39; 95% CI, 3.51–8.27, Supplementary Table 1). Further, women with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection within 30 days before or at delivery had 11% higher odds of CS delivery (aOR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.03–1.20) compared to the reference group (Table 2). Likewise, women with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in early pregnancy experienced 7% higher odds of CS delivery (aOR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.03–1.11). After restricting the analyses to women with recorded test results in LabCov, the associations between confirmed infection within 30 days before or at delivery and MD (aOR, 36.6; 95% CI, 16.6–80.7), post-delivery ICU admission (aOR, 4.80; 95% CI, 3.68–6.26), and CS delivery (aOR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.01–1.19) remained strong.

Discussion

This paper presents results from a national birth registry-based cohort study, conducted in a middle-income country, evaluating the risks of SARS-CoV-2 infection at different times during pregnancy in relation to CS delivery and adverse maternal outcomes. Our results clearly demonstrate that pregnant women with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection within 30 days before or at delivery had a substantially increased risk of MD and post-delivery ICU admission. Compared to the reference group, their odds of MD and post-delivery ICU admission were 43 and 5 times higher, respectively. The odds of CS delivery also increased slightly. Notably, women infected in early pregnancy (conception to 31 days before delivery) and attained 22 weeks of gestation before delivery did not exhibit increased odds of MD or post-delivery ICU admission compared to the reference group, suggesting that the timing of SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy is a clear determinant of maternal risk. Few studies have categorized pregnant women based on the timing of SARS-CoV-2 infection, an important factor in our study. Our results have profound implications and should urge stakeholders to accelerate targeted preventive measures in Georgia to avoid infection during pregnancy.

Our results showing increased odds of MD in pregnant women with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection within 30 days before or at delivery align with previous studies that reported increased MD during the pandemic compared to the pre-pandemic period [23,24,25]. However, these studies did not include individual-level data. Our results also align with those of previous original studies, a large-scale multinational study, and systematic reviews of studies with individual-level data on SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnant women [6, 8, 26,27,28,29,30,31]. While these studies compared MD risk in infected and uninfected women, we additionally demonstrated that the timing of infection during pregnancy is a clear determinant of risk. Thus, ignoring the timing of infection may obscure the negative effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection. In contrast to our findings, a national registry-based study from Denmark found no association between SARS-CoV-2 infection and MD on studying SARS-CoV-2-positive and -negative pregnant women [32]. Our findings also differ from those of a Nordic study that compared infected pregnant women to pregnant women in the pre-pandemic period [33] and from systematic reviews that covered the early period of the pandemic [26, 34]. However, these results are not surprising, given the disparities in resources between high-income and low- or middle-income countries which can influence the adverse effects of the virus on maternal health. Moreover, some studies included in the systematic reviews were performed in the early phases of the pandemic, when less transmissible variants of the virus were circulating, resulting in fewer infected women. Our results suggest that SARS-CoV-2 infection within 30 days before or at delivery significantly contributed to MD in Georgia during the study period. Reduced quality of care during the first wave of infection when the number of cases increased exponentially might explain negative outcomes. However, other factors like lack of staff due to infection and redeployment of staff to support COVID-19 patients may also explain our results. As healthcare systems and pandemic responses differed across countries, study results from different parts of the world vary.

In our study, the odds of post-delivery ICU admission remained almost 5.5 times higher in women with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 within 30 days before or at delivery compared to the reference group, even after excluding women who experienced MD and CS deliveries. In contrast, SARS-CoV-2 infection during early pregnancy did not increase the odds of post-delivery ICU admission, possibly due to sufficient recovery time before delivery. Contrary to initial reports of no serious negative maternal outcomes [26, 32], studies based on data from the later stages of the pandemic are consistent with our findings of increased odds of post-delivery ICU admission in SARS-CoV-2-positive women around the time of delivery [6,7,8, 30, 31]. Although most studies agree that SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy increases risk of ICU admission, the strength of this association varies, possibly due to differences in study designs and sample sizes. As with MD, the increased risk of post-delivery ICU admission in SARS-CoV-2-infected pregnant women may be due to medical, organizational, and economic factors. In-depth investigations are needed to untangle the individual contributions of these factors to prevent future delivery complications in these women.

Our analysis also revealed that women with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection within 30 days before or at delivery had an 11% higher odds of CS delivery than those in the reference group. Additionally, women with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in early pregnancy had slightly increased odds of CS delivery compared with the reference group. Our results are in line with those of a recent meta-analysis indicating a 16% increased risk of CS delivery in SARS-CoV-2-positive women compared to SARS-CoV-2-negative women [8], although other studies have reported no association between SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy and CS delivery [6, 35]. Thus, the association between SARS-CoV-2 infection and CS delivery may vary across countries owing to different clinical management approaches for COVID-19-infected pregnancies.

Another important aspect revealed in our study was the low proportion of pregnant women in Georgia who were fully vaccinated against COVID-19. The preventive effect of vaccination against the development of severe disease and death is unquestionable [36,37,38]. Recent studies have indicated the significant benefit of COVID-19 vaccination for pregnant women, similar to the general population [37,38,39,40]. Although we did not assess the risk of maternal outcomes according to vaccination status, 59% of the women who died in our study were SARS-CoV-2-positive and none were vaccinated against COVID-19. Moreover, only 5.7% of pregnant women admitted to the ICU were vaccinated. These observations underscore the need for future research on the influence of vaccination status on adverse maternal outcomes in SARS-CoV-2 infected pregnant women in Georgia.

The main strength of this study lies in the utilization of the GBR, a national population-based birth registry. Its use minimized selection bias, because registration in the GBR is mandatory by law. MDs were extracted from the Vital Registration System, which has close to 100% coverage. The national testing strategy of frequently and routinely testing pregnant women for SARS-CoV-2 significantly improved the accuracy of our exposure classification and determination of the timing of infection. However, this study had several limitations. Given our study hypothesis that pregnant women are at a higher risk of adverse maternal outcomes when infected with SARS-CoV-2 close to or at delivery, we only included women who attained 22 weeks of gestation. Hence, women who died before GA week 22 were not eligible for our study because delivery before GA week 22 was defined as abortion. This may have affected our results. Moreover, from the beginning of the pandemic until the implementation of routine testing strategies, a considerable proportion of women with undetected SARS-CoV-2 infection in early pregnancy may have been misclassified as part of the reference group. Even after routine testing was implemented during ANC, pregnant women with COVID-19 that resolved between ANC visits would have remained undetected. As shown in other studies, it was not possible to overcome the potential misclassification of participants who were infected but were never tested [41], which may have affected our results. Furthermore, lack of information on the viral variants, infection status prior to pregnancy, severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection, socioeconomic status, and ethnicity could potentially confound the relationship between SARS-CoV-2 infection and maternal outcomes. Moreover, gestational diabetes is rare and may be under-reported. Finally, our results showed the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection on adverse maternal health outcomes in pregnant women; however, we had no information regarding the specific causes of death. Further in-depth study is recommended after clinical audits have been finalized and related information on all MDs during the study period has been collected.

Conclusion

In Georgia, pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infection detected within 30 days before or at delivery had a significantly higher risk of MD and post-delivery ICU admission, along with a modest increase in CS delivery compared to uninfected women. Infection earlier in pregnancy did not increase these risks. As most participants were unvaccinated, these results highlight the urgent need for public health efforts to promote COVID-19 preventive measures among pregnant women.

Data availability

According to Georgian legislation, data from the central health registries can be used for research purposes if personal data are not shared. Appropriate ethical and legal approval are required to meet the criteria for access before requesting data, and only anonymized data can be shared. Researchers can contact the National Center for Disease Control and Public Health in Georgia (ncdc@ncdc.ge) or the corresponding author (natia.skhvitaridze@uit.no) for assistance on how to apply for access to data from central health registries.

Abbreviations

SARS-CoV-2:

severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

COVID-19:

coronavirus disease 2019

CS:

caesarean section

ICU:

intensive care unit

ANC:

antenatal care

MD:

maternal death

MM:

maternal mortality

GA:

gestational age

GBR:

Georgian Birth Registry

BMI:

body mass index

DAGs:

directed acyclic graphs

aORs:

adjusted odds ratios

CIs:

confidence intervals

References

  1. Zaigham M, Andersson O. Maternal and perinatal outcomes with COVID-19: a systematic review of 108 pregnancies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020;99:823–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Marchand G, Patil AS, Masoud AT, Ware K, King A, Ruther S, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of COVID-19 maternal and neonatal clinical features and pregnancy outcomes up to June 3, 2021. AJOG Glob Rep. 2022;2:100049.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Royal College of Obstetricians Gynecologists. Coronavirus infection in pregnancy: Information for healthcare professionals 2020.

  4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. COVID-19 during pregnancy. National Center for Immunization and Respiratory diseases. editor. What We Have Learned: CDC; 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Castro EM. How is COVID-19 affecting pregnant women? Instituto de Salud Global Barcelona, ISGlobal2021.

  6. Metz TD, Clifton RG, Hughes BL, Sandoval GJ, Grobman WA, Saade GR, et al. Association of SARS-CoV-2 infection with serious maternal morbidity and mortality from obstetric complications. JAMA. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2022.1190.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. McClymont E, Albert AY, Alton GD, Boucoiran I, Castillo E, Fell DB, et al. Association of SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy with maternal and perinatal outcomes. JAMA). 2022. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2022.5906.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Smith ER, Oakley E, Grandner GW, Ferguson K, Farooq F, Afshar Y, et al. Adverse maternal, fetal, and newborn outcomes among pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infection: an individual participant data meta-analysis. BMJ Glob Health. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009495.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Mullins E, Perry A, Banerjee J, Townson J, Grozeva D, Milton R, et al. Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of COVID-19: the PAN-COVID study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.07.010.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. National Center for Disease Control and Public Health of Georgia. COVID-19 Report of the National Center for Disease Control and Public Health 2020–2021, the 8th revision. 2022.

  11. National Center for Disease Control and Public Health of Georgia. COVID-19 Statistics in Georgia 2022. Accessed 15 Oct, 2022.

  12. Ministry of Internally Displaced Persons from the Occupied Territories. Health and Social Affairs. National Strategy of Supporting Maternal and Child Health in Georgia 2017–2030. Tbilisi; 2017.

  13. National Center for Disease Control. and Public Health of Georgia. Annual report, 2021. Georgia: NCDC, 2022.

  14. Skhvitaridze N, Anda EE, Brenn T, Kintraia N, Gamkrelidze A. Scoping maternal care through the lens of maternal deaths: a retrospective analysis of maternal mortality in Georgia. Sex Reprod Health; 2020.

  15. National Center for Disease Control and Public Health of Georgia. Three years report on pregnancy and newborns health surveillance electronic registry (Birth Registry). Georgia: NCDC; 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ministry of Internally Displaces Persons from the Occupied Territories., Health and Social Affairs of Georgia, MoH Health Sector Capacity Building and Emergency Preparedness in terms of COVID-19 Pandemic. Action Plan 2022. Georgia, 2022.

  17. Government of Georgia. Decree of the government of Georgia N975 on the approval of the list of priority groups subject to mandatory and routine testing strategy for the SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19. Decree of the Government of Georgia; 2021.

  18. Ministry of Internally Displaces Persons from the Occupied Territories, Health and Social Affairs of Georgia, National Antenatal Care Guideline., 2017. Georgia 2017. Accessed 25 Dec, 2023. https://www.moh.gov.ge/uploads/guidelines/2018/01/30/27c73e076a8aa47c01ccca4200f1e075.pdf.

  19. National Center for Disease Control and Public Health of Georgia. COVID-19 report of the National. Center for Disease Control and Public Health Georgia: NCDC; 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  20. World Health Organization. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems: Tenth revision (ICD-10), Stat. 2nd edition, 2004.

  21. Mancuso P, Venturelli F, Vicentini M, Perilli C, Larosa E, Bisaccia E, et al. Temporal profile and determinants of viral shedding and of viral clearance confirmation on nasopharyngeal swabs from SARS-CoV-2-positive subjects: a population-based prospective cohort study in Reggio Emilia, Italy. BMJ Open. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040380:e040380.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu B, Jayasundara D, Pye V, Dobbins T, Dore GJ, Matthews G, et al. Whole of population-based cohort study of recovery time from COVID-19 in New South Wales Australia. Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2021;12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanwpc.2021.:100193.

  23. Zhamantayev O, Kayupova G, Nukeshtayeva K, Yerdessov N, Bolatova Z, Turmukhambetova A. COVID-19 pandemic impact on the maternal mortality in Kazakhstan and comparison with the countries in Central Asia. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(2184). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032184.

  24. de Carvalho-Sauer RCO, Costa MDCN, Teixeira MG, do Nascimento EMR, Silva EMF, Barbosa MLA, et al. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on time series of maternal mortality ratio in Bahia, Brazil: analysis of period 2011–2020. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03899-y.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. United States Government Accountability Office. Maternal health. Outcomes worsened and disparities persisted during the pandemic. USA, 2022.

  26. Papapanou M, Papaioannou M, Petta A, Routsi E, Farmaki M, Vlahos N, et al. Maternal and neonatal characteristics and outcomes of COVID-19 in pregnancy: an overview of systematic reviews. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020596.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. López-Rodríguez G, Galván M, Valencia ÓG. Comorbidities associated with maternal mortality from COVID-19 in Mexico. Gac Med Mex. 2021. https://doi.org/10.24875/GMM.M21000623.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mendez-Dominguez N, Santos-Zaldívar K, Gomez-Carro S, Datta-Banik S, Carrillo G. Maternal mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic in Mexico: a preliminary analysis during the first year. BMC Public Health 2021.

  29. Chmielewska B, Barratt I, Townsend R, Kalafat E, van der Meulen J, Gurol-Urganci I, et al. Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on maternal and perinatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00079-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Villar J, Ariff S, Gunier RB, Thiruvengadam R, Rauch S, Kholin A, et al. Maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality among pregnant women with and without COVID-19 infection: the INTERCOVID multinational cohort study. JAMA Pediatr. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.1050.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Brioschi Dos Santos AP, Vicente CR, Cola JP, Tanaka LF, Garbin JRT, Dell’Antonio LS, et al. The impact of COVID-19 on maternal death and fetal death, a cohort study in Brazil. PLoS ONE. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0290343.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Aabakke AJM, Krebs L, Petersen TG, Kjeldsen FS, Corn G, Wøjdemann K, et al. SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy in Denmark-characteristics and outcomes after confirmed infection in pregnancy: a nationwide, prospective, population-based cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2021.

  33. Engjom H, Aabakke AJM, Klungsøyr K, Svanvik T, Äyräs O, Jonasdottir E, et al. COVID-19 in pregnancy-characteristics and outcomes of pregnant women admitted to hospital because of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the nordic countries. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2021.

  34. Mullins E, Hudak ML, Banerjee J, Getzlaff T, Townson J, Barnette K, et al. Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of COVID-19: co-reporting of common outcomes from PAN-COVID and AAP-SONPM registries. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.23619.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. McDonnell S, McNamee E, Lindow SW, O’Connell MP. The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on maternity services: A review of maternal and neonatal outcomes before, during and after the pandemic. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.10.023 Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2020.

  36. de Freitas Paganoti C, Alkmin da Costa R, Papageorghiou AT, da Silva Costa F, Quintana SM, Graziela de Godoi L, et al. COVID-19 vaccines confer protection in hospitalized pregnant and postpartum women with severe COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study. Vaccines (Basel). 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10050749.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. World Health Organization. Questions and Answers: COVID-19 vaccines and pregnancy: WHO 2022. Accessed 20 Oct, 2022.

  38. Watanabe A, Yasuhara J, Iwagami M, Miyamoto Y, Yamada Y, Suzuki Y et al. Peripartum outcomes associated with COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.3456.

  39. Fell DB, Dhinsa T, Alton GD, Török E, Dimanlig-Cruz S, Regan AK et al. Association of COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy with adverse peripartum outcomes. JAMA https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2022.4255.

  40. Goldshtein I, Nevo D, Steinberg DM, Rotem RS, Gorfine M, Chodick G et al. Association between BNT162b2 vaccination and incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnant women. JAMA 2021doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.11035.

  41. Palmsten K, Vazquez-Benitez G, Kharbanda EO, Point. Uncertainty about estimating the risks of COVID-19 during pregnancy. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ppe.127732022.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the assistance of the Population Registry Unit of the National Center for Disease Control and Public Health of Georgia. Without their support, this study would have been impossible. In addition, authors would like to thank Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing.

Funding

This study did not receive any funding.

Open access funding provided by UiT The Arctic University of Norway (incl University Hospital of North Norway)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, N-9037, Langnes, Tromsø, PO Box 6050, Norway

    Natia Skhvitaridze, Tinatin Manjavidze, Tormod Brenn & Charlotta Rylander

  2. National Center for Disease Control and Public Health, 99 Kakheti highway, Tbilisi, Georgia

    Natia Skhvitaridze & Tinatin Manjavidze

  3. The University of Georgia, 77a Kostava Street, Tbilisi, Georgia

    Natia Skhvitaridze, Amiran Gamkrelidze & Tinatin Manjavidze

Authors
  1. Natia Skhvitaridze
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Amiran Gamkrelidze
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tinatin Manjavidze
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tormod Brenn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Charlotta Rylander
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All the authors contributed to the methodology, analysis, writing, and editing of the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript and agreed to be responsible for all the provided information. CR, TM, TB, and AG supervised the study. NS, CR, and TM summarized the national datasets and contributed to data collection and curation. NS drafted the manuscript and amended it according to the feedback from all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Natia Skhvitaridze.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Institutional Review Board of National Center for Disease Control and Public Health approved the legal aspects of the study (IRB #2023-001). In addition, Regional Committees for Medical and Health Research Ethics in Northern Norway approved the protocol (Ref: 577179, 20/02/2023). All data included in this paper were extracted from the national population registries and anonymized before the researchers received the dataset; registration in the national registries is mandatory by law; citizens cannot refuse to be registered. Consent was not obtained from study subjects, as was deemed unnecessary according to national regulation (according the Order of Minister of Georgia N01-26/ნ “About the rules of production and delivery of medical statistics”, https://matsne.gov.ge/en/document/view/4509878?publication=0). Therefore, informed consent was not collected. This article is in line with the Declaration of Helsinki and the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Skhvitaridze, N., Gamkrelidze, A., Manjavidze, T. et al. SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy and the risk of adverse maternal outcomes in the Republic of Georgia: a national birth registry-based cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 24, 156 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06329-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06329-x

Keywords

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

ISSN: 1471-2393

Contact us