Skip to main content
Download PDF

The prevalence and associated factors of prenatal depression and anxiety in twin pregnancy: a cross-sectional study in Chongqing, China

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth volume 22, Article number: 877 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Pregnant women expecting twins are more likely to experience stress, which can lead to anxiety and depression. Our aim was to investigate the prevalence of prenatal anxiety and depressive symptoms in women with twin pregnancies and the associated factors.

Methods

In a cross-sectional survey, 210 women with twin pregnancies who satisfied the inclusion and exclusion criteria in two tertiary centers in Southwestern China were asked to complete a basic information form, the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and the Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS). To compare statistics with normal distribution in distinct characteristic groups, a paired t-test, and one-way ANOVA were utilized. Binary logistic step regression was used to analyze the associated factors of antenatal anxiety and depressive symptoms.

Results

The 210 women with twin pregnancies (age = 30.8 ± 4.2 years) were between 7 and 37 gestational weeks (29.2 ± 1.2 weeks), were typically well-educated (72.4% had a post-high-school degree), and reasonably affluent (88.1% were above the low-income cutoff). Among them, 34.8% had symptoms associated with clinical levels of anxiety, and 37.1% had symptoms indicating possible depression. The prevalence of co-morbid anxiety and depressive symptoms was 24.3%. Binary stepwise logistic regression analysis showed that previous health status and sleep disturbance during pregnancy were the associated factors of anxiety symptoms in women with twin pregnancies (P < 0.05), whereas age, previous health status, negative life events, and physical activity during pregnancy were the associated factors of depressive symptoms in women with twin pregnancies (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

About one-third of women with twin pregnancies had symptoms of anxiety or depression; these were most strongly predicted by some modifiable factors, suggesting that early preventive mind-body interventions may be a promising strategy to protect against mental health issues for women with twin pregnancies.

Peer Review reports

Background

With the increasing maternal age at conception and the development of assisted reproduction techniques (ART), the incidence of twin births has dramatically risen over recent decades [1, 2]. A population-based report found that the twin birth rate in the United States increased from 1.89% to 1980 to 3.19% in 2020 [3, 4]. China’s twin birth rate increased from 2.84% to 2012 to 3.22% in 2020 [5]. A recent report compared the data collected in 112 countries from 1980 to 1985 and 165 countries from 2010 to 2015 and found that the global twin birth rate has increased from 9.1 to 1000 to 12 per 1000, which means one of every 42 children born on earth is a twin [6]. Because of the increased twin birth rate all over the world, more attention should be devoted to the health of the population of women with twin pregnancies.

Significant physiological changes, particularly cardiovascular and glucose metabolic changes, may pose considerable challenges to women with twin pregnancies [7, 8]. Correspondingly, pregnant women with twins are more likely to develop hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, gestational diabetes, and other maternal complications [9, 10]. The increased incidence of offspring deaths and morbidity in twin pregnancies, as compared to singleton pregnancy [11, 12], was attributed to preterm delivery [13] and intrauterine growth restriction [14]. For this reason, a twin pregnancy is classified as a high-risk pregnancy. Furthermore, the increased frequency of examinations, prolonged hospitalization [15], and the increased expenditure budget for bringing up two children place an additional financial burden on women pregnant with twins and their families [16]. All of these unavoidable factors may impact the mental health of women who have conceived twins. Hence, evaluating the psychological condition of women with twin pregnancies is of considerable importance.

Only a few studies have been undertaken on the prevalence and associated factors of anxiety and depressive symptoms in women with twin pregnancies. Wang et al. [17] reported that prenatal stress in twin pregnancies increases as the pregnancy progresses. Prenatal stress may raise the chance of adverse emotional outcomes such as anxiety and depressive symptoms in women with twin pregnancies [18]. In 1995, Thorpe et al. compared 147 women pregnant with twins and 11,061 women pregnant with singletons. They found that the prevalence of depressive symptoms is the same, 31% and 26%, at 18 and 32 weeks of gestation [19]. In 2013, major depression was reported in 33.3% (n = 51) of women with twin pregnancies, and this depression was associated with higher stress levels and a lack of social support [20]. A more comprehensive study utilizing larger sample sizes is needed.

The mental health of pregnant women may be related to pregnancy outcomes. High- stress levels in women with twin pregnancies may increase the risk of premature rupture of membranes and preterm birth [17, 21]. The severity of prenatal depressive symptoms has been associated with low Apgar scores of boys in twin neonates [22]. A systematic review has shown that maternal prenatal anxiety and depression have a long-lasting negative influence on the neurodevelopment of children and adolescents [23]. Furthermore, women with higher levels of antenatal anxiety are at increased risk of elevated levels of postnatal anxiety [24]; moreover, postnatal depression may be the continuation of prenatal depression [24, 25]. In conclusion, twin pregnancies may be associated with poor psychological consequences [26]. The financial burden of untreated perinatal mental disorders is still considerable [27]. Thus, negative prenatal mood and disorders are perceived as significant patient safety issues, public health problems, and preventable causes of maternal and infant mortality, which is of concern to healthcare providers and policymakers [28].

Previous studies on pregnant women’s psychological status mainly focused on women pregnant with singletons. However, the mental health of women pregnant with twins has rarely been investigated. As far as we know, the prevalence of anxiety symptoms and co-morbid anxiety and depressive symptoms in twin pregnancies has not been reported. So, the study’s objective was to conduct a cross-sectional study to investigate the prevalence of prenatal anxiety and depression symptoms in women with twin pregnancies and the potential associated factors, including negative life events, sleep disturbance, and physical activity. This study’s findings will be valuable for identifying the high-risk population of antenatal depression and anxiety for women pregnant with twins and developing preventative interventions.

Methods

Design

The study adopted a cross-sectional design and a convenient sampling method. Data were collected at the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University and the Chongqing Health Center for Women and Children from early March to late September 2021. Participants were recruited during routine prenatal examinations at outpatient services designed for women pregnant with twins. After reviewing the medical records, women with twin pregnancies who met the inclusion criteria were invited to participate in the study until the required sample size was reached. Two trained investigators explained the study’s objective, content, and cooperation to the participants. Then participants signed the informed consent and completed several electronic questionnaires. The ethics committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University approved the study (2020 − 199).

Sample size calculation

The sample size was calculated by assuming that the standard deviation of SDS in women with twin pregnancies would be 4.3 in China [29]. If the error is less than 0.6 and α = 0.05, the calculated sample size is n= (Z1−α/2*σ/δ) 2= (1.96*4.3/0.6) 2=198.This result would require the sample size to be roughly 220 to achieve a 10% loss rate for the questionnaire.

Participants

Participants were required to be at least 18 years old, be diagnosed with twin pregnancy by B-scan ultrasonography before 12 ~ 14 weeks of pregnancy, be able to read Chinese, and be willing to participate in the study. Diagnosed with severe organic or congenital diseases, fetal reduction, and pre-pregnancy psychiatric illnesses such as bipolar and schizophrenia were excluded. The study included participants receiving psychotherapy or medication because of prenatal anxiety or depression. Two cases of fetal reduction and one request for termination of pregnancy were excluded, and seven potential participants declined due to lack of time.

Materials

Basic information form

Participants provided detailed demographic information, such as their age, pre-pregnancy BMI (kg/m2), education, occupation, and monthly per capita household income (RMB, renminbi, Chinese yuan). The medical conditions, including the history of psychiatric disorders and previous pregnancy disorders, were collected through medical records. The self-compiled questions were used to evaluate previous health status, depression history, negative life events, sleep disturbance (i.e., difficulty in falling asleep, waking up easily at night or waking up early, insomnia, daytime fatigue, or sleepiness) [30] and regular physical activity (i.e., moderate-intensity aerobic or strength exercise average 20–30 min per day) [31] during pregnancy.

Self- rating anxiety scale

The 20-item Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) [32] was compiled by American doctor William W.K. Zung in 1971. It is widely used and validated in assessing anxiety symptoms [33]. SAS is a four-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (no/a little of the time) to 4 (most of the time/all the time). Higher scores indicate more severe anxiety symptoms. The standard score equals the sum of scores from 20 items multiplied by 1.25. In this study, the standard score below 50 indicates a normal range of anxiety symptoms; 50–59 mild; 60–69 moderate; and over 69 indicates extreme anxiety symptoms [34]. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of the scale was reported as 0.84 [35]. In the current study, Cronbach’s alpha was 0.73.

Self-Rating Depression Scale

The Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) [36] by Zung was used to assess depressive symptoms over the past month. It has been demonstrated as a valuable and effective tool for detecting depressive symptoms in pregnancy [37]. The scale had 20 items, each of which was scored on a four-point scale ranging from 1 (no/a little of the time) to 4 (most of the time/all the time). The standard score equals the cumulative score of 20 items multiplied by 1.25. In this study, the standard score below 53 indicates a normal range of depressive symptoms; 53–62 mild; 63–72 moderate; and over 72 indicates extreme depressive symptoms [34]. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of the scale was reported as 0.86 [35]. The current sample has an internal consistency of 0.85.

Statistical analysis

We analyzed the responses of 210 cases of women with twin pregnancies after excluding ten respondents due to incorrect or incomplete responses. All statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 26.0 software. First, descriptive statistics were used to review the general data; measurement data was expressed in mean ± SD, and count data were expressed in rates. A paired t-test and one-way ANOVA were used to compare the data with normal distribution in different characteristic groups. Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis H tests were used to compare the data with skewed distribution. The above P < 0.2 factors in the corresponding analysis were included in the binary logistic stepwise regression. Multivariate logistic regression analysis assessed the associations of prenatal anxiety and depressive symptoms with different factors. P < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. Data analysis was based on SAS and SDS scoring criteria.

Results

Baseline characteristics of women with twin pregnancies

The participants were women pregnant with twins aged between 21 and 46 years (30.8 ± 4.2) with a mean pre-gravid Body Mass Index (BMI) of 23.0 kg/m2 (± 3.9, range 14.8–38.1). It was determined that 72.4% of the women had an educational level above high school, and 83.3% belonged to the middle- and high-income groups (monthly per capita household income over 4,000 yuan). The average gestational age of women with twin pregnancies was 29.2 (± 1.2, range 7–37), and most were assisted reproductive (65.2%) and dichorionic diamniotic (80.5%) twin pregnancies. The baseline characteristics of the population are shown in Table 1.

Table 1 The level of anxiety and depressive symptoms in different characteristic groups
Full size table

Prenatal anxiety and depressive symptoms

The SAS standard score was 47.0 ± 6.5 in women with twin pregnancies. In the sample, 34.8% (95%CI = 28.4–41.7, n = 73) had symptoms associated with clinical anxiety levels. 137 women were non-anxious (65.2%), 64 women were mildly anxious (30.5%), nine women were moderately anxious (4.3%), and none were severely anxious. On the SDS scale, women with twin pregnancies had an average score of 50.2 (± 9.3), and 37.1% (95%CI = 30.7–44.1, n = 78) reported depressive symptoms. Among them, 132 were non-depressed (62.9%), 57 were mildly depressed (27.1%), 20 were moderately depressed (9.5%), and one was severely depressed (0.5%). The prevalence of co-morbid anxiety and depressive symptoms was 24.3% (95%CI = 18.8–30.8, n = 51). (See Fig. 1)

Fig. 1
figure 1

The number of women with twin pregnancies in different degrees of anxiety and depressive symptoms. SDS: Self-Rating Depression scale; SAS: Self-Rating Anxiety scale

Full size image

Associated factors of prenatal anxiety and depressive symptoms

Good previous health status was associated with a decreased risk of prenatal anxiety symptoms in pregnant women with twins (OR 0.2, 95%CI 0.1–0.4). Sleep disturbance was associated with an increased risk of prenatal anxiety symptoms in women with twin pregnancies (OR 3.1, 95%CI 1.6–6.0). (See Table 2)

Table 2 Binary stepwise logistic regression analysis of anxiety symptoms in women with twin pregnancies
Full size table

Maternal age less than 25 years (OR 3.9, 95%CI 1.2–13.1) and having negative life events in pregnancy (OR 3.3, 95%CI 1.4–7.7) was associated with an increased risk of prenatal depressive symptoms in women with twin pregnancies. Good previous health status negatively correlated with prenatal depressive symptoms (OR 0.4, 95%CI 0.2–0.8). Women with twin pregnancies who undertook physical activity regularly during pregnancy had fewer depressive symptoms (OR 0.4, 95%CI 0.2–0.8). (See Table 3)

Table 3 Binary stepwise logistic regression analysis of depressive symptoms in women with twin pregnancies
Full size table

Discussion

There is growing research in the field of prenatal mental health. However, women with twin pregnancies as the vulnerable group to the mental disorder are still overlooked. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the overall prevalence of both depressive and anxiety symptoms in twin pregnancies with a comparatively large sample size. The key findings of this study were that 34.8% of women pregnant with twins were suffering from anxiety symptoms, and 37.1% of women pregnant with twins had depressive symptoms. The incidence of self-reported co-morbid anxiety and depressive symptoms in women pregnant with twins was 24.3%, higher than the previously reported prevalence in singletons (9.5%) [38]. In summary, according to this study, one in three women pregnant with twins was anxious or depressed.

In this study, the incidence of anxiety symptoms in women with twin pregnancies (34.8%) was significantly higher than that previously reported in women with singleton pregnancies (18.2-24.6%) [39]. Because the rate of maternal and fetal complications and neonatal adverse outcomes is higher in twin pregnancies than in singleton pregnancies [40], this may bring more stress regarding concerns about pregnancy and childbirth safety in women pregnant with twins [17]. The stress related to the adverse consequence may eventually cause anxiety symptoms [41]. The SAS score of women with twin pregnancies (47.0 ± 6.5) in our study was lower than in a 2014 study of the same region (52.9 ± 10.1, n = 60 )[29]. One plausible explanation for this reduced level of anxiety is that over the ensuing years since 2014, treatments for twin pregnancy complications have been developed (such as fetus endoscopy and fetoscopic laser ablation) that have improved neonatal survival rates [42], possibly reducing the anxiety experienced by women with twin pregnancies.

The high prevalence rate of depressive symptoms (37.1%) in this study is comparable to other studies. A recent multi-site study in mainland China found that the prevalence of prenatal depression among singleton pregnant women was 28.4% [43]. According to a systematic review and meta-analysis, the weighted prevalence of prenatal depression was reported to be 19.7% in Chinese singleton women [44]. The prevalence of depressive symptoms in women pregnant with twins is thus higher than in women pregnant with singletons in China. The SDS score of women with twin pregnancies (50.2 ± 9.3) was similar to the previous studies ( 50.6 ± 4.3) [29]. The overall level of depressive symptoms among twin pregnancy women remains high. This situation may be attributed to a lack of further evaluation and continuous monitoring [45] and poor access to quality mental health services [46, 47].

The psychological condition of women with twin pregnancies needs attention and intervention urgently. Exploring the factors associated with anxiety and depressive symptoms in pregnancies with twins may contribute to identifying the twin pregnancy population at high risk of developing anxiety and depression and benefit the selection of preventative interventions in prenatal care.

We found that sleep disturbance during pregnancy was associated with anxiety symptoms in women with twin pregnancies. Sleep disturbance may be caused by changes in lifestyle, physiology, or psychology during twin pregnancy[30]. Long-term sleep disturbance can lead to circadian rhythm disorder, affect the autonomic nervous system and limbic system (which is involved in mediating emotion), worsen mood vulnerability and instigate or exacerbate anxiety symptoms [48]. Sleep disturbance and anxiety may have reciprocal causation and form a vicious circle, eventually affecting the maternal physical health and endangering the fetal growth [49]. As a result, healthcare professionals should assess women with twin pregnancies’ sleep conditions regularly, investigate the causes of sleep disturbance, and provide targeted intervention to assist women with twin pregnancies recover to a healthy physical and psychological state. Digital cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) may be a promising way to treat insomnia symptoms — the main sleep complaint of pregnant women [50].

Notably, in women with twin pregnancies, good previous health status was negatively associated with anxiety and depressive symptoms. Similarly, previous research has found that poor physical health is a major risk factor for perinatal depression [51]. Women expecting twins may experience poorer physical well-being than those expecting a single child [19]. The higher a pregnant woman’s cognitive evaluation of her physical condition, the more confident she will be when confronting the changes, which reflects the close relationship between self-perceived physical health and mental health. Therefore, healthcare providers should pay more attention to the self-reported poor health status of women with twin pregnancies, help them understand the impact of physical health on the pregnancy of twins, correct misperceptions, and promote a sense of self-efficacy in delivery.

Our findings suggest that being under 25 may increase the risk of prenatal depressive symptoms in women with twin pregnancies. A very young age is associated with a low level of resilience[52]. When faced with the enormous physical, psychological and financial challenges brought by twin pregnancy, young women may feel unable to cope with the new situation [53]. Long-standing feelings of helplessness and frustration and a lack of resilience to resist the negative effect of stress may lead to depressive symptoms [51]. Further research into the psychology of this young group and their personal and social resources is warranted. As a low-cost, short-term and effective intervention measure [54], mindfulness-based interventions may be a promising method for these women with twin pregnancies to use daily to improve prenatal depressive symptoms [55].

In this study, one of the associated factors for prenatal depressive symptoms in women with twin pregnancies was the experience of negative life events. The finding is consistent with studies in singleton pregnancies [56, 57]. Negative life events incorporate changes that individuals experience in their social lives that have a negative impact on their mental health in the long term [58].In our study, women with twin pregnancies who reported negative life events during their pregnancy were 3.3 times more likely to have depressive symptoms than those who did not. However, the influence of life events on depression is not straightforward [59]. It has been proposed that social support plays an important role in the relationship between negative life events and depression [60, 61]. Family members, the essential source of social support [62], should provide these women who have conceived twins with sufficient emotional support and living care [63], and should learn to recognize the signs of depression and seek professional help as soon as possible.

Regular physical activity during pregnancy protects women pregnant with twins from depressive symptoms. Physical activity appears to have an inverse relationship with antenatal depressive symptoms [64], and it is a potential non-pharmacological therapy for prenatal depression [65]. However, physical activity recommendations for women with twin pregnancies are limited and impractical [66]. More randomized controlled trials are needed to determine the appropriate physical activity patterns for women with twin pregnancies. By engaging in moderate physical activity such as yoga, women with twin pregnancies may be able to relieve stress and reduce depressive symptoms [67].

This is the first study to report the prevalence of anxiety symptoms and co-morbid anxiety and depressive symptoms in women with twin pregnancies. One strength of this study was investigating associated factors of anxiety and depressive symptoms, including negative life events, sleep disturbance and physical activity in the twin pregnancy population. Moreover, our sample size is comparatively larger than in previous studies. Electronic questionnaires provided a high response rate for this study and enhanced the accuracy of the information. Based on this study, future prospective studies are needed to determine the causal relation between anxiety and depressive symptoms and the associated factors. It would be of great importance to further study the effects of anxiety and depressive symptoms on twin pregnancy outcomes and implement preventative psychological intervention targets on women with twin pregnancies.

There are a few methodological limitations in our study that should be taken into consideration. First, our study sample was obtained through convenience sampling. Our participants, in particular, are primarily city dwellers. Women with twin pregnancies having antenatal examinations in rural hospitals may be more prone to anxiety and depression [68]. So, this study cannot represent the entire population of women pregnant with twins. Secondly, due to the cross-sectional study design, we cannot determine causality in the relationships between our variables. Thirdly, self-reporting questionnaires and the stigma associated with mental health issues [69] may have resulted in an underestimation of the prevalence of antenatal anxiety and depressive symptoms. Fourthly, the prevalence of clinically diagnosed prenatal anxiety and depression in our twin pregnancy population was not determined as mental status examinations were not performed.

Conclusion

One in three women with twin pregnancies in our sample had symptoms of anxiety or depression, and these symptoms were significantly associated with maternal age, previous health status, sleep disturbance, physical activity, and negative life events. According to the above associated factors, high-quality body-mind interventions such as cognitive behaviour therapy, mindfulness-based intervention, and yoga might contribute to managing anxiety and depressive symptoms and improving the perinatal outcomes of twin pregnancies.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ART:

assisted reproduction techniques

BMI:

Body Mass Index

RMB:

Renminbi

SDS:

Self-Rating Depression scale

SAS:

Self-Rating Anxiety scale

M:

mean

SD:

standard deviation

ANOVA:

analysis of variance

N:

number

OR:

Odds Ratio

B:

Regression coefficients

df:

degree of freedom

P:

p-value

CI:

Confidence Interval

CBT:

Cognitive Behavior Therapy

References

  1. Adamson GD, Norman RJ. Why are multiple pregnancy rates and single embryo transfer rates so different globally, and what do we do about it? Fertil Steril. 2020;114(4):680–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.09.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sebghati M, Khalil A. Reduction of multiple pregnancy: Counselling and techniques. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2021;70:112–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2020.06.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Martin JA, Osterman MJK. Is Twin Childbearing on the Decline? Twin Births in the United States, 2014–2018. NCHS Data Brief. 2019;351:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman M. Births in the United States. NCHS data brief. 2020;2021(418):1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chen P, Li M, Mu Y, Wang Y, Liu Z, Li Q,et al. Temporal trends and adverse perinatal outcomes of twin pregnancies at differing gestational ages: an observational study from China between 2012–2020. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022;22(1):467. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04766-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Monden C, Pison G, Smits J. Twin Peaks: more twinning in humans than ever before. Hum Reprod. 2021;36(6):1666–73. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deab029.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Adank MC, Broere-Brown ZA, Gonçalves R, Ikram MK, Jaddoe VWV, Steegers EAP,et al. Maternal cardiovascular adaptation to twin pregnancy: a population-based prospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):327. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-02994-w.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Weissman A, Drugan A. Glucose tolerance in singleton, twin and triplet pregnancies. J Perinat Med. 2016;44(8):893–7. https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2016-0186.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rauh-Hain JA, Rana S, Tamez H, Wang A, Cohen B, Cohen A,et al. Risk for developing gestational diabetes in women with twin pregnancies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009;22(4):293–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767050802663194.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Day MC, Barton JR, O’Brien JM, Istwan NB, Sibai BM. The effect of fetal number on the development of hypertensive conditions of pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106(5 Pt 1):927–31. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000182578.82926.9c.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ho SK, Wu PY. Perinatal factors and neonatal morbidity in twin pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1975;122(8):979–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(75)90360-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. McCarthy BJ, Sachs BP, Layde PM, Burton A, Terry JS, Rochat R. The epidemiology of neonatal death in twins. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981;141(3):252–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9378(16)32628-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gestations M. Twin, Triplet, and Higher-Order Multifetal Pregnancies: ACOG Practice Bulletin Summary, Number 231. Obstet Gynecol. 2021;137(6):1140–3. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000004398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fox NS, Rebarber A, Klauser CK, Roman AS, Saltzman DH. Intrauterine growth restriction in twin pregnancies: incidence and associated risk factors. Am J Perinatol. 2011;28(4):267–72. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1270116.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Da Silva Lopes K, Takemoto Y, Ota E, Tanigaki S, Mori R. Bed rest with and without hospitalisation in multiple pregnancy for improving perinatal outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;3(3):Cd012031. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012031.pub2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chien P. The perinatal burden of preterm delivery and twin pregnancy. Bjog. 2019;126(5):549–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15361.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang W, Wen L, Zhang Y, Wang L, Chen Z, Zhang L,et al. Maternal prenatal stress and its effects on primary pregnancy outcomes in twin pregnancies. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2020;41(3):198–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/0167482x.2019.1611776.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fu W, Wilhelm LO, Wei Y, Zhou G, Schwarzer R. Emotional intelligence and dyadic satisfaction buffer the negative effect of stress on prenatal anxiety and depressive symptoms in Chinese women who are pregnant with twins. Anxiety stress and coping. 2020;33(4):466–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2020.1745193.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Thorpe K, Greenwood R, Goodenough T. Does a twin pregnancy have a greater impact on physical and emotional well-being than a singleton pregnancy? Birth. 1995;22(3):148–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536x.1995.tb00691.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Benute GR, Nozzella DC, Prohaska C, Liao A, de Lucia MC, Zugaib M. Twin pregnancies: evaluation of major depression, stress, and social support. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2013;16(2):629–33. https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2012.153.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Owen DJ, Wood L, Tomenson B, Creed F, Neilson JP. Social stress predicts preterm birth in twin pregnancies. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;38(1):63–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/0167482x.2016.1235146.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gou M, Li L, Fu W, Gong X, Wei Y, Zhou G,et al. Prenatal maternal depressive symptoms of Chinese pregnant women and twin newborns’ physical health: the moderating role of infant sex. Psychol health Med. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2021.1916957.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rogers A, Obst S, Teague SJ, Rossen L, Spry EA, Macdonald JA,et al. Association Between Maternal Perinatal Depression and Anxiety and Child and Adolescent Development: A Meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 2020;174(11):1082–92. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.2910.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Judith A-M, Claudi. B RS, Tjitte. V, Chantal. B, Mariëlle. vP,et al. What If Pregnancy Is Not Seventh Heaven? The Influence of Specific Life Events during Pregnancy and Delivery on the Transition of Antenatal into Postpartum Anxiety and Depression. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019; 9(16):2851. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16162851.

  25. Cankorur VS, Abas M, Berksun O, Stewart R. Social support and the incidence and persistence of depression between antenatal and postnatal examinations in Turkey: a cohort study. Bmj Open. 2015;5(4):e006456. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006456.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Choi Y, Bishai D, Minkovitz CS. Multiple Births Are a Risk Factor for Postpartum Maternal Depressive Symptoms. Pediatrics. 2009;123:1147–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Luca DL, Margiotta C, Staatz C, Garlow E, Christensen A, Zivin K. Financial Toll of Untreated Perinatal Mood and Anxiety Disorders Among 2017 Births in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2020;110(6):888–96. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2020.305619.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Kendig S, Keats JP, Hoffman MC, Kay LB, Miller ES, Moore Simas TA,et al. Consensus Bundle on Maternal Mental Health: Perinatal Depression and Anxiety. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129(3):422–30. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000001902.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Jia M, Liao B. [Investigation on the mental health of twin pregnancy woman during prgnancy period]. Chin J Prac Nurs. 2016;32(1):38–41.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ertmann RK, Nicolaisdottir DR, Kragstrup J, Siersma V, Lutterodt MC. Sleep complaints in early pregnancy. A cross-sectional study among women attending prenatal care in general practice. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):123. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-2813-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Syed H, Slayman T, DuChene Thoma K. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 804: Physical Activity and Exercise During Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period. Obstet Gynecol. 2021;137(2):375–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000004266.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Zung WW. A rating instrument for anxiety disorders. Psychosomatics. 1971;12(6):371–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0033-3182(71)71479-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang Y, Liu R, Li G, Mao S, Yuan Y. The reliability and validity of a Chinese-version Short Health Anxiety Inventory: an investigation of university students. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2015;11:1739–47. https://doi.org/10.2147/ndt.S83501.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang Y, Di Y, Ye J, Wei W. Study on the public psychological states and its related factors during the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in some regions of China. Psychol Health Med. 2021;26(1):13–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2020.1746817.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Dunstan DA, Scott N, Todd AK. Screening for anxiety and depression: reassessing the utility of the Zung scales. BMC Psychiatry. 2017;17(1):329. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1489-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Zung WW. A SELF-RATING DEPRESSION, SCALE. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1965;12:63–70. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1965.01720310065008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Zeng Y, Cui Y, Li J. Prevalence and predictors of antenatal depressive symptoms among Chinese women in their third trimester: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Psychiatry. 2015;15:66. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-015-0452-7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Falah-Hassani K, Shiri R, Dennis CL. The prevalence of antenatal and postnatal co-morbid anxiety and depression: a meta-analysis. Psychol Med. 2017;47(12):2041–53. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291717000617.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Dennis CL, Falah-Hassani K, Shiri R. Prevalence of antenatal and postnatal anxiety: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2017;210(5):315–23. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.116.187179.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. National Guideline A: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence: Clinical Guidelines. In: Twin and Triplet Pregnancy edn. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (UK) Copyright NICE 2019.; 2019.

  41. Blackmore ER, Gustafsson H, Gilchrist M, Wyman C, T GOC. Pregnancy-related anxiety: Evidence of distinct clinical significance from a prospective longitudinal study. J Affect Disord. 2016;197:251–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2016.03.008.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Diehl W, Diemert A, Grasso D, Sehner S, Wegscheider K, Hecher K. Fetoscopic laser coagulation in 1020 pregnancies with twin-twin transfusion syndrome demonstrates improvement in double-twin survival rate. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;50(6):728–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.17520.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhang L, Yang X, Zhao J, Zhang W, Cui C, Yang F,et al. Prevalence of Prenatal Depression Among Pregnant Women and the Importance of Resilience: A Multi-Site Questionnaire-Based Survey in Mainland China. Front Psychiatry. 2020;11:374. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00374.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Nisar A, Yin J, Waqas A, Bai X, Wang D, Rahman A,et al. Prevalence of perinatal depression and its determinants in Mainland China: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2020;277:1022–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.07.046.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Boyce PM, Judd F. Screening for perinatal depression: is it enough? Med J Aust. 2019;210(1):19–20. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.12054.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Dadi AF, Miller ER, Bisetegn TA, Mwanri L. Global burden of antenatal depression and its association with adverse birth outcomes: an umbrella review. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):173. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-8293-9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Patel V, Xiao S, Chen H, Hanna F, Jotheeswaran AT, Luo D,et al. The magnitude of and health system responses to the mental health treatment gap in adults in India and China. Lancet. 2016;388(10063):3074–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(16)00160-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Chellappa SL, Aeschbach D. Sleep and anxiety: From mechanisms to interventions. Sleep Med Rev. 2022;61:101583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smrv.2021.101583.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Lee H, Kim KE, Kim MY, Park CG. Cluster Analysis of the Combined Association of Sleep and Physical Activity with Healthy Behavior and Psychological Health in Pregnant Women. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(4):2185. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18042185.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Felder JN, Epel ES, Neuhaus J, Krystal AD, Prather AA. Efficacy of Digital Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for the Treatment of Insomnia Symptoms Among Pregnant Women: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Jama Psychiatry. 2020;77(5):484–92. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.4491.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Ma X, Wang Y, Hu H, Tao XG, Zhang Y, Shi H. The impact of resilience on prenatal anxiety and depression among pregnant women in Shanghai. J Affect Disord. 2019;250:57–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2019.02.058.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Portzky M, Wagnild G, De Bacquer D, Audenaert K. Psychometric evaluation of the Dutch Resilience Scale RS-nl on 3265 healthy participants: a confirmation of the association between age and resilience found with the Swedish version. Scand J Caring Sci. 2010;24(Suppl 1):86–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6712.2010.00841.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Bödecs T, Szilágyi E, Cholnoky P, Sándor J, Gonda X, Rihmer Z,et al. Prevalence and psychosocial background of anxiety and depression emerging during the first trimester of pregnancy: data from a Hungarian population-based sample. Psychiatr Danub. 2013;25(4):352–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Saha S, Jarl J, Gerdtham UG, Sundquist K, Sundquist J. Economic evaluation of mindfulness group therapy for patients with depression, anxiety, stress and adjustment disorders compared with treatment as usual. Br J Psychiatry. 2020;216(4):197–203. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2018.247.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Sun Y, Li Y, Wang J, Chen Q, Bazzano AN, Cao F. Effectiveness of Smartphone-Based Mindfulness Training on Maternal Perinatal Depression: Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(1):e23410. https://doi.org/10.2196/23410.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Kaiyo-Utete M, Dambi JM, Chingono A, Mazhandu FSM, Madziro-Ruwizhu TB, Henderson C,et al. Antenatal depression: an examination of prevalence and its associated factors among pregnant women attending Harare polyclinics. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):197. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-02887-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Verbeek T, Bockting CLH, Beijers C, Meijer JL, van Pampus MG, Burger H. Low socioeconomic status increases effects of negative life events on antenatal anxiety and depression. Women Birth. 2019;32(1):e138-e43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2018.05.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Li J, Du Y, Liu Y, Du J, Zhang R, Qu P,et al. Maternal exposure to life events during pregnancy and congenital heart disease in offspring: a case-control study in a Chinese population. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):677. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-04154-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. van de Loo KFE, Vlenterie R, Nikkels SJ, Merkus P, Roukema J, Verhaak CM,et al. Depression and anxiety during pregnancy: The influence of maternal characteristics. Birth. 2018;45(4):478–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12343.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Woldetensay YK, Belachew T, Biesalski HK, Ghosh S, Lacruz ME, Scherbaum V,et al. The role of nutrition, intimate partner violence and social support in prenatal depressive symptoms in rural Ethiopia: community based birth cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18(1):374. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-2009-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Bedaso A, Adams J, Peng W, Sibbritt D. The relationship between social support and mental health problems during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Health. 2021;18(1):162. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-021-01209-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Racine N, Plamondon A, Hentges R, Tough S, Madigan S. Dynamic and bidirectional associations between maternal stress, anxiety, and social support: The critical role of partner and family support. J Affect Disord. 2019;252:19–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2019.03.083.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. MacMillan KK, Lewis AJ, Watson SJ, Bourke D, Galbally M. Maternal social support, depression and emotional availability in early mother-infant interaction: Findings from a pregnancy cohort. J Affect Disord. 2021;292:757–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2021.05.048.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Dipietro L, Evenson KR, Bloodgood B, Sprow K, Troiano RP, Piercy KL,et al. Benefits of Physical Activity during Pregnancy and Postpartum: An Umbrella Review. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019;51(6):1292–302. https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0000000000001941.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Vargas-Terrones M, Barakat R, Santacruz B, Fernandez-Buhigas I, Mottola MF. Physical exercise programme during pregnancy decreases perinatal depression risk: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Sports Med. 2019;53(6):348–53. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2017-098926.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Kwiatkowska K, Kosińska-Kaczyńska K, Walasik I, Osińska A, Szymusik I. Physical Activity Patterns of Women with a Twin Pregnancy-A Cross-Sectional Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(15):7724. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18157724.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Gong H, Ni C, Shen X, Wu T, Jiang C. Yoga for prenatal depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry. 2015;15:14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-015-0393-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Khan R, Waqas A, Mustehsan ZH, Khan AS, Sikander S, Ahmad I,et al. Predictors of Prenatal Depression: A Cross-Sectional Study in Rural Pakistan. Front Psychiatry. 2021;12:584287. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.584287.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Meltzer-Brody S. Treating perinatal depression: risks and stigma. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124(4):653–4. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000000498.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all the women with twin pregnancies who participated in this study.

Funding

This research was supported by grants from the Discipline Innovation Foundation in Discipline Cultivation Project of the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (XKTS121); the funders had no role in the design of the study, the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, or in writing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No. 1, Youyilu Street, Yuzhong District, 400016, Chongqing, China

    Ying Zhou, Bizhen Liao & Xinyang Yu

  2. Department of Oncology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, 400030, Chongqing, China

    Jingui Huang

  3. College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, LE1 7RH, Leicester, UK

    Philip N. Baker

Authors
  1. Ying Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jingui Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Philip N. Baker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bizhen Liao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xinyang Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Y Z and XY Y designed the study. Y Z and JG H recruited participants and collected the data. Y Z analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript. BZ L and P B were involved in the conception and revision. All authors critically revised, checked and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Bizhen Liao or Xinyang Yu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the ethics committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (2020 − 199). The study was performed under the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. All participants provided informed written consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, Y., Huang, J., Baker, P.N. et al. The prevalence and associated factors of prenatal depression and anxiety in twin pregnancy: a cross-sectional study in Chongqing, China. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 22, 877 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-05203-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-05203-y

Keywords

  • Twin pregnancy
  • Depression
  • Anxiety
  • Maternal mental health
  • Prevalence

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

ISSN: 1471-2393

Contact us