Skip to main content

Impact of socioeconomic factors and health determinants on preterm birth in Brazil: a register-based study



More than 15 million children are born preterm annually. While preterm survival rates have increased in high-income countries. Low- and middle-income countries, like Brazil, continue to battle high neonatal mortality rates due to a lack of adequate postnatal care. Globally, neonatal mortality is higher for preterm infants compared to those born at term. Our study aims to map and analyze the spatial, socioeconomic, and health coverage determinants related to preterm birth in Brazil in order to understand how spatial variations in demographics and access to primary care may affect preterm birth occurrences. 


Using publicly available national-level data from the Brazilian health system for 2008–2017, we conducted an ecological study to visualize the spatial distributions of preterm birth along with socioeconomic status, the structure of health services, and primary care work process, each consisting of multiple variables reduced via principal component analysis. Regression models were created to determine predictive effects of numeric and spatial variation of these scores on preterm birth rates.


In Brazil, preterm birth rates increased from 2008–2017, with small and rural municipalities frequently exhibiting higher rates than urban areas. Scores in socioeconomic status and work process were significant predictors of preterm birth rates, without taking into account spatial adjustment, with more positive scores in socioeconomic status predicting higher preterm birth rates (coefficient 0.001145) and higher scores in work process predicting lower preterm birth rates (coefficient -0.002416). Geographically weighted regression showed socioeconomic status to be a more significant predictor in the North, with the work process indicators being most significant in the Northeast.


Results support that primary care work process indicators are more significant in estimating preterm birth rates than physical structures available for care. These results emphasize the importance of ensuring the presence of the minimum human resources needed, especially in the most deprived areas of Brazil. The association between social determinants of health and preterm birth rates raises questions regarding the importance of policies dedicated to foster equity in the accessibility of healthcare services, and improve income as protective proxies for preterm birth.

Peer Review reports


More than 15 million children are born preterm, defined as birth prior to 37 completed weeks of gestation [1, 2], each year. Though preterm survival rates have increased in high-income countries, low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) like Brazil still see high rates of neonatal mortality that is often attributed to a lack of adequate postnatal care [3]. Preterm birth (PTB) in LMICs is a growing global public health concern, and among other causes is associated with a lower quality of prenatal preventative care [4]. Brazil ranks among countries with the highest number of PTB [2]. Data from the National Live Births System (SINASC) in Brazil showed that in 2017 the rate of PTB was 11 per 100 live births [5], a higher rate than other Latin American and Caribbean countries [3].

Regional differences in health outcomes in Brazil are a well-known issue, including those regarding the surgical workforce for children [6], microcephaly and Zika virus [7], and cardiac diagnostic testing [8]. PTB appears to show similar spatial variability: while overall rates of PTB in Brazil increased from 6.5% in 2004 to 10.9% in 2017, the distribution of PTB was not balanced across the five official regions: North, Northeast, Center-West, Southeast, and South [9, 10].

To reduce regional disparities in healthcare, Brazil has advanced the implementation of a Universal Health Coverage (UHC) program, the SUS (Sistema Único de Saúde). Created in 1990, the SUS is the national public health system and provides decentralized UHC services through networks of clinics and healthcare facilities [11]. The Brazilian SUS and social security structures have several information systems that systematically collect data from the population in areas including healthcare utilization, healthcare quality, and social vulnerability. As part of SUS, the Family Health Strategy is a community-based program providing primary health care (PHC) services through Family Health Teams composed of at least family physicians, nurses, nursing technicians, and community health agents [12]. Evidence suggests that improvements in PHC resources in Brazil have the potential to reduce PTB rates [13], and that UHC can improve life expectancy at birth [14] and ensure healthcare services required to children’s growth [15].

Health conditions (e.g., maternal diabetes, pregnancy history), sociodemographic factors (e.g., low education and socioeconomic status), health habits (e.g., stress and work habits) and health care infrastructure (e.g., quality of care, number of prenatal care visits) are well-known predictors of PTB worldwide [10, 16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. Regional inequalities exist in Brazil in regards to socioeconomic status [24], healthcare services [25], and healthy life expectancy [26]. Several studies have analyzed factors related to PTB in Brazil including socio-demographics and availability of prenatal care [27,28,29], however none have utilized a geographic information systems (GIS) approach to geospatially map the rates and locations of these factors in association with PTB.

GIS approaches have been shown to be a promising research strategy to understand social and geographic determinants of health [30, 31]. Analyzing the effect of predictors over the spatial distributions of PTB may be a useful approach to uncover spatially-dependent risk and protective factors for PTB in Brazil. The use of GIS-based approaches may generate insights capable of improving maternal and child health across the municipalities. There is a lack of studies using sophisticated geospatial modeling techniques, such as geographically weighted regression (GWR), to better understand the spatial PTB risk, as well as the potential impact of socio-demographic determinants on prematurity. Our study aims to map and analyze the spatial, socioeconomic, and the health coverage determinants related to PTB in Brazil in order to understand how spatial variations in demographics and access to quality primary care may affect PTB occurrences.


Study design

We conducted a longitudinal, ecological study based on regularly collected Brazil health system data following the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) protocol [32]. The data analyzed regarding PTB in Brazil ranged from 2008 through 2017. The following variables were considered: PTB rates, socioeconomic data, physical structure of primary care facilities, and healthcare work process. The structure and work process of health services were initially collected by each health facility. Socioeconomic data was collected at the municipality level. The overall unit of analysis was at municipality level.

Study population, data sources and variables assessed

Three groups of variables were considered to estimate PTB risk: data regarding PTB characteristics; data concerning the quality of primary care, measured through the availability of physical structure to offer care, as well as the work process performed by the primary care teams; and social determinants of health, considered as confounders to explain the municipality-level PTB rates. Combining data from multiple health information systems with social determinants of health data, we examined the impact of socio-demographics on PTB rates in Brazil using a geospatial approach.

The Brazilian Ministry of Health (MoH), by Live Births Information System (SINASC), is responsible for sharing all information collected regarding the epidemiological information of live birth outcomes in the country [5, 33]. We used this system to retrieve data about week of birth, prenatal care, newborn weight, Apgar score, mother's age at birth date, municipality of birth, and type of delivery rate of PTB from 2008 to 2017.

The National Program for Improving Primary Care Access and Quality (PMAQ) is a monitoring survey conducted biannually to evaluate the quality of the health care teams [34]. This survey provided data on infrastructure of health services as well as PHC work processes in Brazil. Within the PMAQ, the “structure of health services” refers to static structures and “work process” represents dynamic activities, among the activities included in this Program there are the territorialization and sanitary accountability, accessibility, reception and preferential gateway, longitudinal care, comprehensive network care management, and so on. The PMAQ was based on Donabedian’s structure—process—outcome model, with embedded strategies for qualification, monitoring, and evaluation of health teams that is linked to a financial incentive for municipalities that meet set standards of access and quality [35]. The program is organized into biennial cycles developed in continuous and complementary phases [36]. According to the Brazil MoH, PMAQ data consisted of 17,202 teams across 3,944 municipalities (in 2012–2013) and 29,778 teams across 5,040 municipalities (in 2013–2014). The data corresponding to the first (2012) and second (2014) PMAQ cycles ( were considered in the analysis of this manuscript.

Data for social determinants came from the 2010 census in Brazil, most recent information available. To assess the impact of these indicators in the PTB rates, we evaluated data regarding average life expectancy (years), rate of under 1 year old mortality by 1,000 live birth, rate of under 5 year old mortality by 1,000 live birth, % of the population in the municipality without formal education, % of the population in the municipality with 8 or less years of education, GINI index of the municipality (a synthetic indicator that captures the level of inequality for a given variable and population), % of the population in the municipality categorized as living in poverty, and average per capita income within municipality.

To evaluate the aforementioned predictors affecting the PTB rates, we used data from 29,178,429 live births distributed across the 5,562 Brazilian municipalities, between the years of 2007 and 2017. The raw indicators analyzed were grouped according to the structure described in the supplementary material.

Data analysis-analytical approach

Spatial distribution and autocorrelation

In order to analyze the predictive relationships between PTB and health coverage determinants, we first aimed to understand PTB distribution in Brazil. We mapped the average spatial distributions of PTB rates (number of PTB/100 births) across two time periods, 2008–2012 and 2013–2017, to reduce possible nonspecific and irregular variations which can lead to misunderstandings of the results. We performed spatial autocorrelation to visualize clusters of PTB for both time periods across Brazil municipalities. Spatial autocorrelation measures the presence of dispersion or clustering in a region through Moran’s I (Index). The Moran's I index assumes a positive or negative value varying between -1 and 1, with a value of zero representing the hypothesis of spatial interdependence [37]. However, since a negative global Moran’s I value may not necessarily indicate the absence of spatial correlation on a local level [38], local indicators of spatial association (LISA) were applied by calculating and evaluating the significance of each city’s Moran’s I at alpha = 0.05, to find de clusters with high rates of PTB. The clusters are visualized on choropleth maps and characterized as follows: high-high (a city with a high PTB rate is close to others that also exhibit high PTB rates), high-low (a city with a high PTB rate is adjacent to others that have low PTB rates), low–high (a city with a low PTB rate is adjacent to others that have high PTB rates), low-low (cities with low PTB rates adjacent to others that also have low PTB rates) and NS (no significance, in which cities with high PTB rates are surrounded by cities with both high and low PTB rates).

Predictive modeling

We built a GWR model, aggregating data from socioeconomic status, structure of health services, and primary care work process seeking to forecast the PTB rate for each Brazilian municipality. To assess the spatial effect of social determinants on PTB rates, we performed an additional analytical step split into two approaches. The first analytical approach aimed to reduce the dimensionality of the predictors through principal component analysis (PCA) to meet the statistical requirements of GWR analysis. This first step generated factors summarizing the raw indicators selected for the analysis. These resulting factors were used as proxies of the predictors concerning socioeconomic status and the structure and work process of primary care services. The second analytical step used the GWR model to estimate the levels of PTB rates in the Brazilian municipalities. The predictors considered for GWR analysis came from the factors resulting from dimensionality reduction.

  1. 1.

    First analytical step- PCA for dimensionality reduction.

Since each domain (socioeconomic status, primary care work process, and structure of health services) consists of multiple variables, it is important to avoid using variables that are highly correlated due to multicollinearity issues. The use of several variables with overlapping variance can artificially inflate the portion of variance explained by each, thus creating a validity problem. The main strategy to overcome this is using dimensionality reduction approaches. Therefore, we used PCA on the indicators concerning socioeconomic status, structure of health services, and primary care work process to obtain a smaller, non-overlapping, number of factors representing each of the predictors. PCA is an orthogonal linear transformation [39] such that the largest eigenvalues (principal components) can be used to reconstruct a large amount of the variance of the original data [40]. The appropriate number of variables to retain for each domain was determined using component loadings and Scree plots (created to display total variation in each domain explained by each component). One factor was retained for each one of the three dimensions considered in the present study. The three factors were considered as predictors to generate a spatially weighted regression model aiming to forecast the PTB rate by municipality.

  1. 2.

    Second analytical step- GWR models considering the factors representing health determinants and their impact on PTB rates.

To understand associations between PTB and factors from the three health coverage domains, we adopted an approach based on spatially weighted regression models. The spatial dependency highlights the situations in which the local of the occurrence of a phenomenon can be at least partially explained by the geospatial perspective. To verify if the observed behavior regarding the PTB distribution over the Brazilian territory is modulated by the spatial dimension, we first ran a regression model using the Ordinary Least Square (OLS) approach without weighting the model for the spatial dimension. The OLS regression model minimizes the sum of square differences between predicted and observed values, leading to model parameter estimates without geographic representation [41].

The residuals of the regression model represent the magnitude of the distance between the forecasted values and the actual ones. Coefficients of the model must be statistically significant, without heteroscedasticity, and residuals normally distributed without spatial autocorrelation [42]. If the residuals of the OLS model are spatially correlated, this suggests the presence of spatial dependency of the object being studied. Thus, residuals from the initial OLS model were analyzed for spatial self-correlation using Moran’s I to evaluate the amount of PTB that could be explained by the spatial perspective. Once spatial dependency is observed, the best suitable model to forecast the variation in PTB rates is a GWR model. Since the residuals from the OLS predictive PTB analysis showed a strong spatial self-correlation, we used GWR to identify possible local associations and demonstrate the spatial effect of the multivariate model. GWR is a spatial analysis technique that takes non-stationary variables like environmental characteristics into account, to model predictive relationships [43].

GWR models use multivariate regression to evaluate associations between potential predictors and an outcome measure, weighting the results by the locality of occurrence [44]. The GWR model tested the PTB rate by municipality as the outcome measure, and the PCA factors regarding the socioeconomic status, structure of health services, and primary care work process as predictors. All analyses were performed using RStudio [45]. PCA was conducted using the psych package in R. The spatial self-correlation and OLS model were processed using GeoDa software (Spatial Analysis Laboratory, Urbana, IL) [46], and the GWR model by GWR 4.0 [47]. Choropleth maps were created using QGIS 2.14 software [48].


Spatial distribution of PTB and spatial autocorrelation

Between the first (2008–2012) and second (2013–2017) ranges of years, we saw an increase in PTB rate across the majority of municipalities nationwide. From 2008 to 2012, PTB was highest in the North, South and Southeast portion of the country. Between 2013 and 2017, PTB rates were at least 5–9.9% across all cities, with more cities in the North reporting rates higher than 15%. During the 2013–2017 time period, nearly all regions of the country reported an increase in their PTB rate (Fig. 1A, B).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Distribution of preterm birth rate (per 100 births) by Brazilian municipalities (top) and spatial autocorrelation (bottom) across two-time frames. The plot of each time frame reflects an average rate over that time period. Data were extracted from the National Register of Live Births in Brazil via the SINASC from 2008–2017- Autocorrelation was conducted via the local indicators for spatial association (LISA) spatial cluster analysis, measuring spatial association within adjacent cities within each administrative region

In the 2013–2017 time period, the analysis of spatial correlation of the raw PTB rates, when compared to the 2008–2012 results, showed a larger number of high-high clusters and fewer low-low clusters (Fig. 1C,D). We observed fewer areas of “no significance” in the second time period (especially in the North portion of the country), indicating more similar PTB rates between adjacent municipalities. The number of municipalities categorized as a high-high cluster reflects an increasing trend in terms of PTB occurrence in the second period analyzed.

PCA dimensionality reduction and GWR analysis

The PCA loads attributed to the variables regarding socioeconomic status, structure of health services, and primary care work process are significantly different across the five regions of Brazil. (Tables 1, 2 and 3). The loadings coefficients represent a linear combination predicting a variable by the (standardized) components. Higher loadings coefficients identify which variables have the largest effect on each component resulting from the PCA analysis. Loadings close to -1 or 1 indicate that the variable strongly influences the component. A positive value represents a direct association between the variable considered and the principal component representing the dimension reduced, and the negative value represents the opposite.

Table 1 Descriptive analysis and PCA component loadings of socioeconomic status variables
Table 2 Descriptive analysis and PCA component loadings of structure of health services variables
Table 3 Descriptive analysis of structure of work process variables

Dimensionality reduction through PCA for the groups of variables described in Tables 1, 2 and 3 established the following components as most important to explain the total variance of the dimensions assessed: i. For socioeconomic status, the percentage of population living in poverty, life expectancy, HDI index, and formal education were most important; ii. Tetanus/diphtheria and hepatitis B vaccine availability were the most important for the structure of health services; and iii. Offering guidance for the tetanus vaccine, nursing consultations, and registering pregnant medical data (work process) were most important for the primary care work process.

Scree plots showing variance of each component loadings can be examined in Fig. 2. The PCA scores regarding socioeconomic status were more positive in the North and Northeast part of the country. For the work process, positive values were observed in the Northeast region of Brazil (Fig. 3).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Scree plots and variance statistics across loadings for all three domains. Label: PC = principal component, FA = factor analysis, SS = sum of squares, cumulative var = cumulative variance, proportion var = proportion variance

Fig. 3
figure 3

Distributions of socioeconomic status, structure of health services, and work process scores across Brazilian municipalities. Higher scores in socioeconomic status represent less positive and worse situations, while higher scores in the structure of health services and work process represent more availability of structure and work process

The factor loadings obtained were used as predictors to perform a GWR analysis. Scores in both socioeconomic status and work process were significant predictors of PTB rates, without taking into account spatial adjustment (OLS model), with socioeconomic status directly related to PTB rates (t value higher than 1.96), and maternal primary care work process was inversely related to PTB rates (t value lower than -1.96) (Table 4). By analyzing the GWR output, it was possible to observe that socioeconomic status is a more significant predictor in the North, with the work process most significant in the Northeast. The structure of health services does not appear to be a significant predictor of PTB across any region of Brazil (Fig. 3).

Table 4 Comparison of the OLS and GWR multivariate spatial regression models

Figure 4 represents the statistical significance and the coefficients obtained by the GWR analysis. The maps on the right side reflect the municipalities in which the PCA predictors selected were significantly associated with the PTB rates and the directionality of the association. Positive values represent a trend in which an increase in the predictors is directly related to the outcome, and negative values are flagging the opposite trend. The maps on the left side are highlighting the magnitude of the observed PCA coefficients to estimate the PTB rate. The coefficients in the left side represent the intensity of association between the predictors and the outcome, and should be considered as relevant only for the significant areas flagged in the maps of the right side.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Coefficients and significance factors from GWR model of socioeconomic status, structure of health services, and work process scores predicting PTB across Brazilian municipalities

The GWR coefficients regarding the socioeconomic status were correlated negatively to PTB in the North, Midwest, and in portions of the Southeast and South regions. The orange areas highlighted as -1.96 in Fig. 4-B calls attention to municipalities presenting opposite trends between the PTB rate and socioeconomic status. The brown group of municipalities highlights areas in which an increase in the socioeconomic status is associated also with an increase in the PTB rates.

In terms of the structure of health services, shown in panel D of Fig. 4, a larger number of municipalities present opposite trends between availability of primary care physical structure and PTB rates (orange areas). Only a few municipalities registered a direct spatial association between primary care structure and the levels of PTB rates.

The analysis of the primary care work process followed the general trends observed in the other 2 domains. Large extensions of the North and Midwest regions exhibited a negative association between the work process and the PTB rates. The regions presenting scattered municipalities categorized as having a direct association between the primary care work process and the PTB levels could be observed in the North and South regions of the country.


The global increase in PTB rates over the past two decades is important for clinicians, researchers, and health policy makers. Understanding which factors affect PTB is an important element in understanding this phenomenon and fostering coordinated actions to tackle this challenge. Considering there is a lack of studies using a geospatial approach to characterize PTB rates, we performed a novel ecological study aiming to estimate PTB rates in Brazil using social determinants and PHC characteristics as predictors.

Our findings indicate increasing PTB rates across all regions of Brazil from 2008–2017. As PTB remains a risk factor for under-5 mortality and future morbidity [49], regional trends in PTB must continue to be monitored. Results from the GWR indicate that socioeconomic status and PHC services can be used as proxies to estimate the level of PTB rates in some regions of Brazil. The results obtained highlight the presence of regional disparities in factors positively or negatively associated with PTB. The impact of the social determinants of health and primary care quality were not the same nationwide. Our geospatial analysis highlights priority regions for combating high rates of PTB through targeted health policies and interventions.

Our findings regarding socioeconomic impact on PTB obtained in the OLS analysis are aligned with some literature on the direct relationships between maternal socio-demographics and PTB in Brazil [27, 28, 50, 51]. Our results demonstrated that primary care services availability may be important to reduce the PTB, especially in the most deprived regions, as observed in the North region of Brazil. For some municipalities, the primary care service is the only available health service within a 3- or 4-h distance. Our findings delineate existing regional disparities of birth health outcomes in Brazil [9, 10, 52], with the higher socioeconomic status in the South regions, and primary care service accessibility of the Northeast, being protective against PTB. The association between social determinants of health and PTB level raises questions regarding the importance of policies dedicated to foster equity in healthcare service accessibility, and income improvements as protective proxies for PTB.

Policy-makers and public health officials in Brazil may consider expanding existing research on health services [53,54,55] and exploring why certain health services are underused. Further research is also warranted into the availability and use of valuable health services, as PCA suggested eight variables (four from socioeconomic status, one from the structure of health services, and three from primary care work process) to be most reflective of the variance of each of these domains. Our study demonstrated that the primary care work process may provide a better means to estimate PTB rates, rather than the physical health system components. Indeed, the ability of health professionals to offer care is more strongly linked to reported PTB levels than is the regional distribution of equipment or supplies. These results emphasize the importance of ensuring the presence of sufficient clinical staff and human resources, especially in the most resource-limited areas of the country.

This study has a few important limitations. First, despite the advantage of using a geographically weighted regression model, the presence of other geographic barriers to healthcare access or spatial predictors, such as exposure to pollutants, may have impacted the variance of the outcome measure. Second, due to the limited availability of data regarding other factors potentially associated with PTB, our results only took into consideration some of the potential predictors associated with our outcome measure. Lastly, the use of secondary data regarding administrative records in our analysis inserts the potential for selection bias due to inadequate registering of events. To combat the risk of ecological fallacy due to the nature of this study, our analysis of data by municipality takes into account the impact of inequality at intra-state and municipal levels.


Our findings support that primary care work process indicators are more significant in estimating PTB rates than physical structures available for care. These results emphasize the importance of ensuring the presence of the minimum human resources needed, especially in the most deprived areas of Brazil. The association between social determinants of health and PTB rates raises questions regarding the importance of policies dedicated to foster equity in the accessibility of healthcare services, and improve income as protective proxies for preterm birth. So, further on this topic should investigate the impact of social determinants of health at the individual level and the impact on birth outcomes.

Availability of data and materials

The data used for the present manuscript can be found at:



Geographically Weighted Regression




Local Indicators for Spatial Association


Low- and middle-income countries


Ministry of Health


Ordinary Least Square


Principal Component Analysis


National Program for Improving Primary Care Access and Quality


Preterm Birth


Live Births System


Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology


Sistema Único de Saúde


Universal Health Coverage


  1. Walani SR. Global burden of preterm birth. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020;150(1):31–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Blencowe H, Bhutta Z, Althabe F, Lawn J, Howson C. Born too soon: a global action report for 15 million preterm births. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012;119:S171–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chawanpaiboon S, Vogel JP, Moller A-B, Lumbiganon P, Petzold M, Hogan D, et al. Global, regional, and national estimates of levels of preterm birth in 2014: a systematic review and modelling analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2019;7(1):e37–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Enweronu-Laryea C, Dickson KE, Moxon SG, Simen-Kapeu A, Nyange C, Niermeyer S, et al. Basic newborn care and neonatal resuscitation: a multi-country analysis of health system bottlenecks and potential solutions. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15(suppl 2):S4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. DATASUS. Sistema de Informação de Nascidos-vivos. Database: DATASUS; 2022. Available from: [cited 2022 Sept 14].

  6. Rocha TAH, Vissoci J, Rocha N, Poenaru D, Shrime M, Smith ER, et al. Towards defining the surgical workforce for children: a geospatial analysis in Brazil. BMJ Open. 2020;10(3):e034253.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Amaral P, Carvalho LR, Hernandes TAH, Silva NC, Vissoci JRN. Geospatial modeling of microcephaly and zika virus spread patterns in Brazil. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(9):e0222668.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Hertz JT, Fu T, Vissoci JR, Rocha TAH, Carvalho E, Flanagan B, et al. The distribution of cardiac diagnostic testing for acute coronary syndrome in the Brazilian healthcare system: A national geospatial evaluation of health access. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(1):e0210502.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Melo EC, Oliveira RR, Mathias TAF. Factors associated with the quality of prenatal care: an approach to premature birth. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2015;49(4):540–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Silveira MF, Santos IS, Barros AJD, Matijasevich A, Barros FC, Victora CG. Increase in preterm births in Brazil: review of population-based studies. Rev Saude Publica. 2008;42(5):957–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Montekio VB, Medina G, Aquino R. Sistema de salud de Brasil. Salud Pública Mex. 2011;53(suppl. 2):s120–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Andrade MV, Coelho AQ, Xavier Neto M, Carvalho LR, Atun R, Castro MC. Transition to universal primary health care coverage in Brazil: Analysis of uptake and expansion patterns of Brazil’s Family Health Strategy (1998–2012). PLoS ONE. 2018;13(8):e0201723.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Leal MC, Esteves-Pereira AP, Viellas EF, Domingues RMSM, Gama SGN. Prenatal care in the Brazilian public health services. Rev Saude Publica. 2020;54:08.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ranabhat CL, Atkinson J, Park M-B, Kim C-B, Jakovljevic M. The Influence of Universal Health Coverage on Life Expectancy at Birth (LEAB) and Healthy Life Expectancy (HALE): A Multi-Country Cross-Sectional Study. Front Pharmacol. 2018;9:960.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. World Health Organization (WHO). Nearly 30 million sick and premature newborns in dire need of treatment every year. Database: WHO; 2018. Available from: [cited 2020 Aug 30].

  16. Goldenberg RL, Culhane JF, Iams JD, Romero R. Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet. 2008;371(9606):75–84.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Gravett MG, Rubens CE, Nunes TM, GAPPS Review Group. Global report on preterm birth and stillbirth (2 of 7): discovery science. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010;10(suppl 1):S1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Marleen S, Hettiarachchi J, Dandeniya R, Macgreggor R, Aquilina J, Khalil A, et al. Maternal clinical predictors of preterm birth in twin pregnancies: A systematic review involving 2,930,958 twin pregnancies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018;230:159–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Thompson JMD, Irgens LM, Rasmussen S, Daltveit AK. Secular trends in socio-economic status and the implications for preterm birth. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2006;20(3):182–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Muglia LJ, Katz M. The enigma of spontaneous preterm birth. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(6):529–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nascimento LFC. Epidemiology of preterm deliveries in Southeast Brazil: a hospital-based study. Rev Bras Saude Mater Infant. 2001;1(3):263–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rondó PHC, Ferreira RF, Nogueira F, Ribeiro MCN, Lobert H, Artes R. Maternal psychological stress and distress as predictors of low birth weight, prematurity and intrauterine growth retardation. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2003;57(2):266–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. He J-R, Ramakrishnan R, Lai Y-M, Li W-D, Zhao X, Hu Y, et al. Predictions of Preterm Birth from Early Pregnancy Characteristics: Born in Guangzhou Cohort Study. J Clin Med. 2018;7(8):185.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Ferreira Filho JBS, Horridge MJ. Economic integration, poverty and regional inequality in Brazil. Rev Bras Econ. 2006;60(4):363–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Greca D, Fitzgerald E. Meeting healthcare challenges in Brazil - KPMG Global. 2019. Available from: [cited 2020 Aug 30].

  26. Szwarcwald CL, Souza Júnior PRB, Marques AP, Almeida WS, Montilla DER. Inequalities in healthy life expectancy by Brazilian geographic regions: findings from the National Health Survey, 2013. Int J Equity Health. 2016;15(1):141.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Silveira MF, Victora CG, Barros AJD, Santos IS, Matijasevich A, Barros FC. Determinants of preterm birth: Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil, 2004 birth cohort. Cad Saude Publica. 2010;26(1):185–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Leal MC, Esteves-Pereira AP, Nakamura-Pereira M, Torres JA, Theme-Filha M, Domingues RMSM, et al. Prevalence and risk factors related to preterm birth in Brazil. Reprod Health. 2016;13(suppl 3):127.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Aragão VMF, Silva AAM, Aragão LF, Barbieri MA, Bettiol H, Coimbra LC, et al. Risk factors for preterm births in São Luís, Maranhão. Brazil Cad Saude Publica. 2004;20(1):57–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Higgs G. The role of GIS for health utilization studies: literature review. Health Serv Outcomes Res Method. 2009;9(2):84–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lovett A, Haynes R, Sünnenberg G, Gale S. Car travel time and accessibility by bus to general practitioner services: a study using patient registers and GIS. Soc Sci Med. 2002;55(1):97–111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Benchimol EI, Smeeth L, Guttmann A, Harron K, Moher D, Petersen I, et al. The Reporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) statement. PLoS Med. 2015;12(10): e1001885.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Paim J, Travassos C, Almeida C, Bahia L, Macinko J. The Brazilian health system: History, advances, and challenges. Lancet. 2011;377(9779):1778–97.

  34. Telles R, Weigelt LD, Rezende MS, Krug SBF, Ferreira R, Kessler AL, et al. Implementação do programa nacional de melhoria do acesso e da qualidade da atenção básica (PMAQ-AB). Rev Epidemiol Control Infect. 2016;1(1):1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Donabedian A. The role of outcomes in quality assessment and assurance. QRB Qual Rev Bull. 1992;18(11):356–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Gonçalves MR. Contribuições do programa nacional de melhoria do acesso e da qualidade da atenção básica (PMAQ-AB) para avaliação da atenção nutricional: uma análise a partir do primeiro ciclo do programa. 2014. 56 f. Dissertação (Mestrado) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Faculdade de Educação, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Educação, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil.

  37. Longley PA, Tobón C. Spatial dependence and heterogeneity in patterns of Hardship: An intra-urban analysis. Annals of AAG. 2004;94(3):503–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Fontes KB, Alarcão ACJ, Nihei OK, Pelloso SM, Andrade L, Carvalho MDB. Regional disparities in the intimate partner sexual violence rate against women in Paraná state, Brazil, 2009–2014: an ecological study. BMJ Open. 2018;8(2):e018437.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Jolliffe IT. Principal Component Analysis. 2nd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Jolliffe IT, Cadima J. Principal component analysis: a review and recent development. Philos Transact A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2016;274(2065):20150202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Pohlman JT, Leitner DW. A comparison of Ordinary Least Squares and Logistic Regression. OHIO J Sci. 2003;103(5):118–25.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Shifti DM, Chojenta C, Holliday EG, Loxton D. Application of geographically weighted regression analysis to assess predictors of short birth interval hotspots in Ethiopia. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(5) eCollection 2020.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. ArcGIS Pro. How Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR) works—ArcGIS Pro. Database: ArcGIS Pro. United States: Esri Press; 2020. Available from: [cited 2020 July 23].

  44. Vissoci JRN, Ong CT, Andrade L, Rocha TAH, Silva NC, Poenaru D, et al. Disparities in surgical care for children across Brazil: Use of geospatial analysis. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(8):e0220959.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. RStudio. Open source & professional software for data science teams - RStudio. Database: RStudio; 2020. Available from: [cited 2020 Aug 28].

  46. Anselin L, Syabri I, Kho Y. Geoda: an introduction to spatial data analysis. Geogr Anal. 2006;38(1):5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Nakaya T, Fotheringham AS, Charlton M, Brunsdon C. Semiparametric geographically weighted generalized linear modeling in GWR 4.0. Database: Maynooth University Research Archive Library (MURAL); 2009. Available from: [cited 2020 July 23].

  48. QGIS. A Free and Open Source Geographic Information System. Database: QGIS; 2022. Available from: [cited 2022 Sept 14].

  49. Cupen K, Barran A, Singh V, Dialsingh I. Risk Factors Associated with Preterm Neonatal Mortality: A Case Study Using Data from Mt. Hope Women’s Hospital in Trinidad and Tobago. Children (Basel). 2017;4(12):108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Barbieri MA, Silva AA, Bettiol H, Gomes UA. Risk factors for the increasing trend in low birth weight among live births born by vaginal delivery. Brasil Rev Saude Publica. 2020;34(6):596–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Theme-Filha MM, Baldisserotto ML, Fraga ACSA, Ayers S, Gama SGN, Leal MC. Factors associated with unintended pregnancy in Brazil: cross-sectional results from the Birth in Brazil National Survey, 2011/2012. Reprod Health. 2016;13(Suppl 3):118.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Victora CG, Aquino EML, Leal MC, Monteiro CA, Barros FC, Szwarcwald CL. Maternal and child health in Brazil: progress and challenges. Lancet. 2011;377(9780):1863–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Travassos C, Viacava F, Pinheiro R, Brito A. Utilization of health care services in Brazil: gender, family characteristics, and social status. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2002;11(5–6):365–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Silva MT, Galvão TF. Use of health services among adults living in Manaus Metropolitan Region, Brazil: population-based survey, 2015. Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2017;26(4):725–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Stopa SR, Malta DC, Monteiro CN, Szwarcwald CL, Goldbaum M, Cesar CLG. Use of and access to health services in Brazil, 2013 National Health Survey. Rev Saude Publica. 2017;51(suppl 1):3s.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Foundation of Research Support from Maranhão`s State, and by the Brazilian National Council of Research (CNPQ) for their support in the present study.


This work was supported, in whole or in part, by: 1) The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1202186]; 2) The National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico – CNPq acronym in Portuguese) [Grants 443834/2018–0 and 306592/2018–5]; 3) The Maranhão Foundation for Research and Scientific and Technological Development (Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e ao Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico do Maranhão – FAPEMA acronym in Portuguese) [RCUK-01538/19]; and 4) The Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior – CAPES acronym in Portuguese) [finance code 001]. 

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



LA: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft. ASK: Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft. TAHR: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft. DGA: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft. NCS: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft. RCSQ: Funding acquisition, Validation, Writing – review & editing. MM:Writing – review & editing. SR: Funding acquisition, Validation, Writing – review & editing. LAF: Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. AAMS: Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. CS: Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. JRNV: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. EBAFT: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript. 

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luciano de Andrade.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Federal University of Maranhão IRB (Protocol # 3.172.930/2019). All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

Supplementary material. Indicators assessed to forecast PTB at the municipality level in Brazil.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Andrade, L., Kozhumam, A.S., Rocha, T.A.H. et al. Impact of socioeconomic factors and health determinants on preterm birth in Brazil: a register-based study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 22, 872 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Brazil
  • Preterm birth
  • Child health
  • Maternal health
  • Primary health care or Primary health care