Skip to main content
Download PDF

Maternal vitamin D status in early pregnancy and its association with gestational diabetes mellitus in Shanghai: a retrospective cohort study

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth volume 22, Article number: 819 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

There is growing interest regarding vitamin D and its potential role in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). We aimed to assess maternal vitamin D status in early pregnancy and its relationships with the risk of GDM in a Chinese population in Shanghai.

Methods

The retrospective cohort study included a total of 7816 pregnant women who underwent a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) during 24–28 weeks of gestation. Participants’ demographic information including maternal age, prepregnancy body mass index (BMI), gestational age, parity, season of blood collection, serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D [25(OH)D] data and other blood biomarker data at 6 to 14 weeks of gestation were retrospectivly extracted from the medical records in the hospital information system.

Results

In the cohort, the prevalence of GDM was 8.6% and the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency in early pregnancy was 53.1 and 38.5%, respectively. The mean value of the serum 25(OH)D concentration was 19.6±7.5 ng/mL. The restricted cubic splines model showed an inverted J-shaped relationship in which the risk of GDM decreased when the 25(OH)D concentrations were ≥ 20 ng/mL. Logistic model analysis showed that 25(OH)D concentrations ≥ 30 ng/mL significantly decreased the risk of GDM (odds ratio = 0.63, 95% confidence interval: 0.45-0.89; P = 0.010) compared with 25(OH)D concentrations < 20 ng/ml.

Conclusions

In early pregnancy, vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency were very common, and a high level of vitamin D showed protective effects against the incidence risk of GDM.

Peer Review reports

Background

Vitamin D deficiency during pregnancy is a common public health problem [1,2,3]. There is increasing interest in several nonskeletal actions of vitamin D deficiency during pregnancy, including its effects on placental function, glucose homeostasis, infection and the inflammatory response [4,5,6]. Evidence exists for to associations of vitamin D deficiency during pregnancy with perinatal complications such as gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), preeclampsia, spontaneous miscarriage, preterm labor, and neurodevelopmental outcomes [5, 7,8,9,10,11,12].

Evidence for a relationship between vitamin D status and GDM has been deeply investigated [13,14,15,16]. The different results in the literature can be partially attributed to differences in the cutoff of vitamin D deficiency, the timing of serum collection, the dosage of calcium supplementation, the acceptability of calcium supplementation, population dietary habits, socioeconomic status, and nutrient-associated genes.

Therefore, understanding the role of vitamin D in the development of GDM is essential for developing possible individualized supplementation suggestions to prevent GDM. The aim of the study was to assess vitamin D status in early pregnancy and understand its association with GDM risk based on data from an urban population in Shanghai, China.

Methods

Study population

This study was a retrospective cohort study of pregnant women conducted at Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. From June 2018 to May 2019, 9163 eligible pregnant women who underwent a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) during 24–28 weeks of gestation were enrolled in this study. The included participants were women who had undergone serum vitamin D measurement during their first antenatal care visit at 6 to 14 weeks of gestation. The exclusion criteria included multiple pregnancies and chronic diseases, such as type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, lupus, malignancies, thyroid disorders, and acute or chronic liver diseases. Ultimately, a total of 7816 participants were included in this study. The institutional review board of the hospital approved the study protocol.

Diagnosis of GDM

All pregnant women underwent a 75-g OGTT at 24–28 weeks of gestation. OGTTs were performed after an overnight fast for at least 8 h while the subjects were on an unrestricted diet with unlimited physical activity for at least three days. A diagnosis of GDM was made when any of the following criteria were met, according to the recommendations of the International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Consensus Panel: a fasting glucose level ≥5.1 mmol/L, 1-h glucose level ≥10.0 mmol/L, or 2-h glucose level ≥8.5 mmol/L [17].

Data collection

Participants’ demographic information including maternal age, prepregnancy body mass index (BMI), gestational age, parity, season of blood collection, vitamin D data and other blood biomarker data at 6 to 14 weeks of gestation were extracted from the medical records in the hospital information system. The prepregnancy BMI [weight (kg)/height (m)2] was calculated from self-reported prepregnancy weight and height. Prepregnancy BMI categories were determined based on the recommendations of the Group of China Obesity Task Force of the Chinese Ministry of Health [18]. Gestational age was determined according to the date of the last menstrual period and was confirmed by ultrasound reports in the first trimester. The season of blood sampling at the first prenatal visit was classified as spring (from 1 March to 15 May), summer (from 16 May to 30 September), autumn (from 8 October to 30 November), and winter (from 1 December to 28 February) according to the distinct climatic features in Shanghai in 2018 and 2019.

Blood sample collection and measurements

Fasting blood samples were collected at 6-14 weeks of pregnancy during the first antenatal care visit and at 24-28 weeks of pregnancy during the routine antenatal screening for GDM. Blood samples were immediately measured by a clinical laboratory without being frozen. Plasma glucose and triglycerides (TGs) were measured by a 7600 series automatic analyzer (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) was measured using a Haemoglobin Testing System (Bio–Rad, California, USA). The serum 25(OH)D level, which is considered an accurate biomarker to indicate maternal vitamin D status [19,20,21], was quantified through an electrochemistry assay using a vitamin analyzer (Synovie, Chongqing, China). The lower and upper limits of 25(OH)D detection were 9.5 ng/mL and 55.5 ng/mL, respectively. The results of laboratory biomarkers were reported within 6 working hours and were quantified by the clinical laboratory of the hospital.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics in the form of frequencies (n) and percentages (%) were used to describe the maternal vitamin D status at 6–14 weeks of pregnancy, which we categorized into deficient (<20 ng/mL), insufficient (20–29.9 ng/mL) or sufficient (≥30 ng/mL), as suggested by the Endocrine Society [20]. Similar descriptive statistics were applied to describe the incidence of GDM at 24–28 weeks of pregnancy which participants were categorized into GDM group and non-GDM group [17].

Continuous data are summarized as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) or median (interquartile range) (IQR), and categorical data are displayed as percentages. The t test or ANOVA was used to test the differences in quantitative variables with a normal distribution. Nonparametric tests, including the Dunn test and Kruskal-Wallis test, were used for skewed variables. The chi-square test was used to assess differences in categorical variables. Logistic regression analyses were used to investigate the associations of serum 25(OH)D with GDM. Moreover, we used a restricted cubic spline (RCS) regression model to further analyze the dose–response relationship between vitamin D status and GDM risk. Knots were set at the 5th, 50th, and 95th percentiles and the reference value was set to the serum 25(OH)D level of 20 ng/ml.

Odds ratios (ORs), adjusted ORs (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported. Potential confounding variables (such as maternal age, prepregnancy BMI, haemoglobin levles, total cholesterol levels, lipoprotein levels) known to be associated with GDM were included in multivariable models [22, 23]. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant in all analyses. All statistical procedures were performed using SPSS version 20.0. and R version 4.2.0.

Results

Distribution of serum 25(OH)D concentrations in early pregnancy

The serum 25(OH)D concentrations of pregnant women according to the categories of the relevant confounding variables are shown in Table 1. In total, the mean value of the serum 25(OH)D concentration of 7816 pregnant women, measured at 6-14 weeks of gestation, was 19.6±7.5 ng/mL. A total of 4152 (53.1%), 3011 (38.5%), and 653 (8.4%) pregnant women had deficient, insufficient, or sufficient concentrations of 25(OH)D, respectively.

Table 1 The serum 25(OH)D concentration of pregnant women in early pregnancy stratified by different characteristics
Full size table

We found a significant difference in the serum 25(OH)D concentration among pregnant women at different ages (p < 0.001), and the serum mean 25(OH)D concentration was obviously higher in pregnant women over 35 years of age. Multiparous women had a significantly higher serum concentration of 25(OH)D than nulliparous women (P =0.002). The serum 25(OH)D concentration was significantly different among women with different prepregnancy BMIs (P =0.004). Pregnant women who were obese before pregnancy had an obviously lower mean serum 25(OH)D concentration, while there was no significant difference in the serum 25(OH)D concentration among pregnant women who were underweight, normal weight, and overweight before pregnancy. A statistically decreasing trend of seasonal variations in the maternal 25(OH)D concentration was found (P < 0.001), and the mean concentration was lowest when drawn in the winter.

The prevalence of vitamin D sufficiency was higher in pregnant women over 35 years of age and multiparous pregnant women (P < 0.001 and P = 0.003). The prevalence of vitamin D deficiency was significantly higher in pregnant women who had a prepregnancy BMI ≥28 kg/m2 (P < 0.001). Vitamin D deficiency was most common in winter and least common in summer (P < 0.001) (Table 1).

Participant characteristics in early pregnancy among women with and without GDM

A total of 669 (8.6%) pregnant women were diagnosed with GDM at 24-28 weeks of gestation. Table 2 shows the baseline characteristics of the participants with and without GDM in early pregnancy. Compared with the non-GDM group, the GDM group was older, had a higher prepregnancy BMI, had higher levels of TGs, HbA1c, and fasting glucose, and had a higher proportion of multiparous and overweight and obese women. Retrospectively comparing serum 25(OH)D levels in early pregnancy, the GDM group had lower mean concentrations and a lower proportion of sufficient vitamin D categories than the non-GDM group.

Table 2 Demographic and clinical characteristics of pregnant women with and without GDM in early pregnancy
Full size table

Associations of maternal vitamin D status with GDM risk

Relationship analysis was performed using 25(OH)D concentrations as continuous and categorical variables. Table 3 presents the results of the logistic regression analysis for GDM in relation to the categories of serum 25(OH)D concentrations by different models. Compared with women with 25(OH)D concentrations < 20 ng/ml, the GDM risk had no significantly difference in women with 25(OH)D concentrations ranging from 20 to 29.9 ng/ml (OR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.88-1.23; P = 0.652), while the GDM risk was significantly lower in women with 25(OH)D concentrations ≥ 30 ng/ml even after adjusting for potential confounding demographic factors (aOR 0.63 [95% CI 0.45-0.91]; P = 0.012) or adjusting for potential confounding demographic factors and laboratory biomarkers (aOR 0.65 [95% CI 0.45-0.93]; P = 0.019). The RCS model suggested inverted J-shaped associations of vitamin D status with GDM after adjusting for maternal age and prepregnancy BMI (P for nonlinear trend = 0.012). There was no significant association between vitamin D levels and GDM when the 25(OH)D concentrations were <20 ng/mL and the risk of GDM decreased when the 25(OH)D concentrations were >20 ng/mLand continued to decrease when the 25(OH)D concentrations were >30 ng/mL (Fig. 1).

Table 3 Results of logistic regression analyses for development of GDM according to maternal serum vitamin D levels in early pregnancy
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Restricted cubic spline curve association between vitamin D concertrations (ng/mL) and GDM risk, adjusted for maternal age, and prepregnancy BMI. A vitamin D level of 20 ng/mL was selected as the reference level. The blue areas represent 95% CIs. Knots were located at the 5th, 50th and 95th percentiles. Dashed vertical lines represent the category thresholds of 20 ng/mL (deficiency) and 30 ng/mL (sufficiency)

Full size image

Discussion

In this retrospective cohort study including 7816 Chinese women, vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency were common in early pregnancy. Nonlinear associations of vitamin D status with GDM were observed. A vitamin D level ≥ 20 ng/mL was a significant protective factor against incident GDM.

In our study, the mean 25(OH)D concentration was 19.6±7.5 ng/mL, 53.1% of the women had a deficient level of 25(OH)D, and only 8.4% had a sufficient concentrations of 25(OH)D according to the Endocrine Society cutoffs in early pregnancy. The rate of maternal vitamin D deficiency ranges widely. For example, the mean level of serum 25(OH)D and the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency were 30.4 ng/mL and 20.7%, respectively, in Hispanic pregnant women [14], 27.2 ng/mL and 28% in Australian and New Zealand women [24], and 13.15 ng/mL and 82.8% in Indonesian women [25]. Even in China, the rates of vitamin D deficiency also range widely in different cities. In Xi’an, the mean 25(OH)D concentration was 15.8 ng/mL in pregnant women, and 76.9% were defined as having vitamin D deficiency [26]. In the Beijing urban area in the winter, over 90% of pregnant women had vitamin D deficiency, and none had sufficient 25(OH)D concentrations [27]. In Shanghai, 69% of pregnant women had a deficient level of 25(OH)D, 22% had an insufficient level, and 9% had a sufficient level in 2012 [28]. The difference may result from many factors, including the variations in subject samples, dietary habits, determination methods, gestational weeks, assessment seasons, and longitude and latitude. Compared with Tao MF’s study in 2012 [28], vitamin D deficiency appeared to be slightly improved in Shanghai in the past decade in our study population. Micronutrient intake has improved in the Chinese population in the past decade, but natural foods that are rich in vitamin D and food and beverages that are fortified with vitamin D remain limited and greater attention and management is still needed to modify public health risks.

Little is known about factors influencing maternal vitamin D status. Major factor may be exposure to sunlight, vitamin D intake and requirements for vitamin D [15, 29, 30]. In this study, we investigated several factors. As expected, we observed that serum vitamin D levels had a seasonal variation, with the highest concentrations in the spring and summer and the lowest concentrations in the autumn and winter. We also observed that pregnant women aged ≥35 years, multiparas, and women with a lower prepregnancy BMI had higher mean serum 25(OH)D levels and a higher proportion of vitamin D sufficiency. The reason may be that vitamin D is stored in adipose tissue and accordingly reduces bioavailability [31]; therefore, women with prepregnancy overweight and boesity probably had lower 25(OH)D status. We speculate that multiparas and pregnant women of advanced age are probably more willing to supplement vitamins to obtain better pregnancy outcomes, but this speculation still needs further behavioral investigation. Similar findings were mentioned in Aji AS’s study in Indonesian women: vitamin D sufficient pregnant women were shown to be older, have a lower bodyweight before pregnancy and in the first trimester, have a lower likelihood of being nulliparous, have more outdoor activity hours and have a lower level of sunscreen application.

Our study is supportive of an increasing number of studies showing that vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency were associated with an increased risk of GDM [32, 33]. In our study, the GDM group had a lower mean level of vitamin D and lower proportion of vitamin D sufficiency in early pregnancy. Consistently, logistic regression analysis results also revealed that compared with women with 25(OH)D concentrations < 20 ng/mL, the risk was lower in women with 25(OH)D concentrations ≥30 ng/mL even after adjusting for confounding factors.

In the literature, many studies have aimed to clarify this situation. A recent study conducted in pregnant women in Hefei, China, found that GDM risk was significantly reduced only in pregnant women with 25(OH)D concentrations >20 ng/mL compared with women with 25(OH)D concentrations < 10 ng/mL [15]. Lacroix et al. found that lower first trimester 25(OH)D levels were associated with a higher risk of developing GDM even after adjustment for vitamin D confounding factors and GDM risk factors [34].

Other studies showed that the mean 25(OH)D levels and vitamin D deficiency were not significantly different between women with and without GDM [2, 35]. Similar result was also showed in our study, that the GDM risk was not significantly different in women with 25(OH)D concentrations ranging from 20 to 29.9 ng/mL compared with women with 25(OH)D concentrations < 20 ng/mL. A possible partial explanation for these conflicting data is that the effects of vitamin D status on GDM risk may be confounded and nonlinear. Our study observed inverted J-shaped associations of vitamin D levels with GDM risk, which is consistent with findings from other observational studies. Our findings, supported by Yin, W.J. et al., showed that 25(OH)D levels < 50 nmol/L (20 ng/mL) did not affect GDM risk, and a reduction in GDM risk was observed only when pregnant women had a mean 25(OH)D level that was greater than 20 ng/mL [15]. However, the threshold concentrations of 25(OH)D are different among studies. Pham, T.T.M.et al. demonstrated that GDM risk is higher at 25(OH)D levels <20 ng/mL and >35 ng/ml [2]. Salakos et al. found that GDM risk was low for women with 25(OH)D levels <10 ng/mL, increased for those with levels of 10-25 ng/mL, decreased for thosed with levels 25-40 ng/mL and increased for those with levels >40 ng/mL [36]. Recently, a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies found a significant U-shaped nonlinear association between serum vitamin D concentrations and the risk of developing GDM. They suggested that the risk of developing GDM is significantly high when maternal serum vitamin D concentrations are lower than 16 ng/mL or higher than 36 ng/mL. Individuals with serum vitamin D concentrations between 16 and 36 nmol/L had a significantly reduced risk of GDM [37]. The authores speculated that vitamin D levels within the cutoff range may be beneficial and that levels above or below the cutoff appear to be harmful in populations with different vitamin nutritional statuses. The strength of the association between vitamin D cutoffs and GDM risk possibly depends on the internal variations of individuals, the proportion of women with vitamin D deficiency, the prevalence of GDM, and gestational age.

Vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy could protect against GDM [3, 32]. However, there is insufficient evidence to precisely determine at what gestational age, volume, and frequency calcium supplementation should be commenced to confer this benefit. One study suggested that pregnant women taking 400-600 IU of vitamin D/d with a mean 25(OH)D concentration of 20 ng/mL had a lower risk of GDM [15]. The Endocrine Society suggests that pregnant women require at least 600 IU/d of vitamin D and recognize that at least 1500–2000 IU/d of vitamin D may be needed to maintain a blood level of 25(OH)D above 30 ng/mL [20]. In this study, vitamin D levels ≥ 20 ng/mL might be significant protective factors against GDM, and we speculate that vitamin D supplemention may be needed to maintain 25(OH)D levels above 20 ng/mL. However, it remains uncertain whether this will confer additional health benefits, and well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed to elicit the clear effect of vitamin D supplementation on the prevention of GDM.

Limitations of this study include the following: 1) This study was conducted in a single hospital with a single ethnic group; it is not possible to provide an exact, generalizable cutoff for increased GDM risk based on vitamin D levels at this stage. 2) Residual confounding cannot be ruled out, as we did not analyze data regarding vitamin D supplementation, the dietary intake of vitamin D, education levels, social data, physical activities, or family history of disease.

Conclusions

Vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency were very common in women in Shanghai. Vitamin D levels ≥ 20 ng/mL in early pregnancy were significantly association with a lower risk of GDM. Individualized vitamin D supplementation before or during pregnancy should be considered to minimize the risk of GDM.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

GDM:

Gestational diabetes mellitus

25(OH)D:

25-hydroxy vitamin D

BMI:

Body mass index

CI:

Confidence interval

OR:

Odds ratio

References

  1. Zhang W, Stoecklin E, Eggersdorfer M. A glimpse of vitamin D status in Mainland China. Nutrition. 2013;29(7–8):953–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pham TTM, Huang YL, Chao JCJ, Chang JS, Chen YC, Wang FF, Bai CH. Plasma 25(OH)D concentrations and gestational diabetes mellitus among pregnant women in Taiwan. Nutrients. 2021;13(8):2538.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Amrein K, Scherkl M, Hoffmann M, Neuwersch-Sommeregger S, Kostenberger M, Berisha AT, Martucci G, Pilz S, Malle O. Vitamin D deficiency 2.0: an update on the current status worldwide. Euro J Clin Nutri. 2020;74(11):1498–513.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Brannon PM. Vitamin D and adverse pregnancy outcomes: beyond bone health and growth. Proc Nutr Soc. 2012;71(2):205–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wei SQ, Qi HP, Luo ZC, Fraser WD. Maternal vitamin D status and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013;26(9):889–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ashley B, Simner C, Manousopoulou A, Jenkinson C, Hey F, Frost JM, Rezwan FI, White CH, Lofthouse EM, Hyde E, et al. Placental uptake and metabolism of 25(OH)vitamin D determine its activity within the fetoplacental unit. Elife. 2022;11: e71094.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Aghajafari F, Nagulesapillai T, Ronksley PE, Tough SC, O’Beirne M, Rabi DM. Association between maternal serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level and pregnancy and neonatal outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Bmj-Brit Med J. 2013;346: f1169.

  8. Zhao X, Fang R, Yu RQ, Chen DZ, Zhao J, Xiao JP. Maternal vitamin D status in the late second trimester and the risk of severe preeclampsia in Southeastern China. Nutrients. 2017;9(2):138.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Chowdhury R, Kunutsor S, Vitezova A, Oliver-Williams C, Chowdhury S, Kiefte-de-Jong JC, Khan H, Baena CP, Prabhakaran D, Hoshen MB, et al. Vitamin D and risk of cause specific death: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational cohort and randomised intervention studies. BMJ. 2014;348: g1903.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Hollis BW, Wagner CL. Vitamin D and pregnancy: skeletal effects, nonskeletal effects, and birth outcomes. Calcified Tissue Int. 2013;92(2):128–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Yadama AP, Mirzakhani H, McElrath TF, Litonjua AA, Weiss ST. Transcriptome analysis of early pregnancy vitamin D status and spontaneous preterm birth. Plos One. 2020;15(1): e0227193.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Achkar M, Dodds L, Giguere Y, Forest JC, Armson BA, Woolcott C, Agellon S, Spencer A, Weiler HA. Vitamin D status in early pregnancy and risk of preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(4):511.e1-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Farrant HJ, Krishnaveni GV, Hill JC, Boucher BJ, Fisher DJ, Noonan K, Osmond C, Veena SR, Fall CH. Vitamin D insufficiency is common in Indian mothers but is not associated with gestational diabetes or variation in newborn size. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2009;63(5):646–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nobles CJ, Markenson G, Chasan-Taber L. Early pregnancy vitamin D status and risk for adverse maternal and infant outcomes in a bi-ethnic cohort: the Behaviors Affecting Baby and You (B.A.B.Y.) study. Br J Nutr. 2015;114(12):2116–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Yin WJ, Tao RX, Hu HL, Zhang Y, Jiang XM, Zhang MX, Jin D, Yao MN, Tao FB, Zhu P. The association of vitamin D status and supplementation during pregnancy with gestational diabetes mellitus: a Chinese prospective birth cohort study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2020;111(1):122–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhu B, Huang K, Yan S, Hao J, Zhu P, Chen Y, Ye A, Tao F. VDR Variants rather than early pregnancy vitamin D concentrations are associated with the risk of gestational diabetes: the Ma’anshan Birth Cohort (MABC) study. J Diabetes Res. 2019;2019:8313901.

  17. Metzger BE, Gabbe SG, Persson B, Buchanan TA, Catalano PM, Damm P, Dyer AR, de Leiva A, Hod M, Kitzmiller JL, et al. International association of diabetes and pregnancy study groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(3):676–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhou BF. Cooperative meta-analysis group of the working group on obesity in C: predictive values of body mass index and waist circumference for risk factors of certain related diseases in Chinese adults–study on optimal cut-off points of body mass index and waist circumference in Chinese adults. Biomed Environ Sci. 2002;15(1):83–96.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Shao A, Dawson-Hughes B, Hathcock J, Giovannucci E, Willett WC. Benefit-risk assessment of vitamin D supplementation. Osteoporos Int. 2010;21(7):1121–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Holick MF, Binkley NC, Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Gordon CM, Hanley DA, Heaney RP, Murad MH, Weaver CM, Endocrine S. Evaluation, treatment, and prevention of vitamin D deficiency: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(7):1911–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. van Schoor NM, Lips P. Worldwide vitamin D status. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;25(4):671–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Xiong X, Saunders LD, Wang FL, Demianczuk NN. Gestational diabetes mellitus: prevalence, risk factors, maternal and infant outcomes. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2001;75(3):221–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. MacDonald SC, Bodnar LM, Himes KP, Hutcheon JA. Patterns of gestational weight gain in early pregnancy and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus. Epidemiology. 2017;28(3):419–27.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Wilson RL, Leviton AJ, Leemaqz SY, Anderson PH, Grieger JA, Grzeskowiak LE, Verburg PE, McCowan L, Dekker GA, Bianco-Miotto T, et al. Vitamin D levels in an Australian and New Zealand cohort and the association with pregnancy outcome. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18(1):251.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Aji AS, Erwinda E, Yusrawati Y, Malik SG, Lipoeto NI. Vitamin D deficiency status and its related risk factors during early pregnancy: a cross-sectional study of pregnant Minangkabau women, Indonesia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):183.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang H, Xiao Y, Zhang L, Gao Q. Maternal early pregnancy vitamin D status in relation to low birth weight and small-for-gestational-age offspring. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2018;175:146–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Song SJ, Zhou L, Si SY, Liu JL, Zhou JL, Feng K, Wu J, Zhang WY. The high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency and its related maternal factors in pregnant women in Beijing. Plos One. 2013;8(12): e85081.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Tao MF, Shao HF, Gu JH, Zhen Z. Vitamin D status of pregnant women in Shanghai. China J Matern-Fetal Neo M. 2012;25(3):237–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Chen YH, Fu L, Hao JH, Yu Z, Zhu P, Wang H, Xu YY, Zhang C, Tao FB, Xu DX. Maternal vitamin D deficiency during pregnancy elevates the risks of small for gestational age and low birth weight infants in Chinese population. J Clin Endocr Metab. 2015;100(5):1912–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pratumvinit B, Wongkrajang P, Wataganara T, Hanyongyuth S, Nimmannit A, Chatsiricharoenkul S, Manonukul K, Reesukumal K. Maternal vitamin D status and its related factors in pregnant women in Bangkok, Thailand. Plos One. 2015;10(7): e0131126.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Shen Y, Pu LY, Si ST, Xin X, Mo MJ, Shao BL, Wu JH, Huang MX, Wang SJ, Muyiduli X, et al. Vitamin D nutrient status during pregnancy and its influencing factors. Clinical Nutrition. 2020;39(5):1432–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang Y, Gong Y, Xue H, Xiong J, Cheng G. Vitamin D and gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review based on data free of Hawthorne effect. BJOG. 2018;125(7):784–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang MX, Pan GT, Guo JF, Li BY, Qin LQ, Zhang ZL. Vitamin D deficiency increases the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Nutrients. 2015;7(10):8366–75.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Lacroix M, Battista MC, Doyon M, Houde G, Menard J, Ardilouze JL, Hivert MF, Perron P. Lower vitamin D levels at first trimester are associated with higher risk of developing gestational diabetes mellitus. Acta Diabetol. 2014;51(4):609–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hauta-Alus HH, Viljakainen HT, Holmlund-Suila EM, Enlund-Cerullo M, Rosendahl J, Valkama SM, Helve OM, Hytinantti TK, Makitie OM, Andersson S. Maternal vitamin D status, gestational diabetes and infant birth size. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):420.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Salakos E, Rabeony T, Courbebaisse M, Taieb J, Tsatsaris V, Guibourdenche J, Senat MV, Haidar H, Jani JC, Barglazan D, et al. Relationship between vitamin D status in the first trimester of pregnancy and gestational diabetes mellitus - A nested case-control study. Clinical Nutrition. 2021;40(1):79–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Milajerdi A, Abbasi F, Mousavi SM, Esmaillzadeh A. Maternal vitamin D status and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Clin Nutr. 2021;40(5):2576–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the participation of the research assistants, biomedical laboratory assistant, and field data enumerator for their support in this study. We appreciate all the participants for their co-operation and support of this study.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number Grant No. 81871184 and No. 81471469.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Yan Cheng and Jiayuan Chen contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, 128 Shenyang Road, Shanghai, 200090, China

    Yan Cheng, Tingting Li, Jiangnan Pei, Yongfang Fan, Mulan He, Shuangping Liu, Junxiu Liu, Qingying Zhang & Haidong Cheng

  2. Zhongshan hospital, Fudan university (Xiamen branch), Jinhu Road 668, Xiamen, 361015, China

    Jiayuan Chen

Authors
  1. Yan Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jiayuan Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tingting Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jiangnan Pei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yongfang Fan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Mulan He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Shuangping Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Junxiu Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Qingying Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Haidong Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization, H.C. and Q.Z.; methodology, J.C. and Y.C.; investigation, T.L., J.L. S.L. and M.H.; data curation, J.C., Y.C., J.P. and Y.F.; data analysis, Y.C. and J.C.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.C.; writing—review and editing, H.C. and Q.Z; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Qingying Zhang or Haidong Cheng.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University ([2015] grant no. 41). Data were extracted from medical records, and the consent to participate was unavailable due to the retrospective design of the study and difficulty in reconnection; however, the private information was well protected.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cheng, Y., Chen, J., Li, T. et al. Maternal vitamin D status in early pregnancy and its association with gestational diabetes mellitus in Shanghai: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 22, 819 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-05149-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-05149-1

Keywords

  • Vitamin D status
  • Gestational diabetes mellitus
  • Serum 25(OH)D
  • Pregnant women

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

ISSN: 1471-2393

Contact us