Skip to main content
Download PDF

The incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus among women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth volume 22, Article number: 370 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Previous studies have shown that polycystic ovary syndrome is a predictor of gestational diabetes mellitus, but we do not know exactly how many polycystic ovary syndrome patients may develop gestational diabetes mellitus. Currently, the incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus among women with polycystic ovary syndrome varies greatly across studies, ranged from 4.12% to 59.50%. Besides, many factors have been found to be related to the incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus among women with polycystic ovary syndrome, but the results among different studies are not consistent. The possible causes of inconsistencies between the current estimates were unclear. This review aimed at exploring the pooled incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus among women with polycystic ovary syndrome, summarizing possible causes of the inconsistencies in the current estimates, try to provide a reference for prevention of gestational diabetes mellitus and polycystic ovary syndrome in the future.

Methods

Systematic searches of different databases (including EMBASE, Web of Science, MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, CNKI and PubMed) were conducted for studies published until 31 May 2021. Statistical analyses were performed using R software, the pooled incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus among polycystic ovary syndrome patients was combined using random effects model. Cochrane’s “Tool to Assess Risk of Bias in Cohort Studies” was used for quality assessment.

Results

Twenty-two longitudinal studies were included. A total of 24,574 women with polycystic ovary syndrome were identified in the 22 articles, of which 4478 were reported with gestational diabetes mellitus. The pooled incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus among women with polycystic ovary syndrome was 20.64%, with a 95% CI of 14.64% to 28.30%. In the meta-regression model, several variables including age, area, quality score and sample size were suggested as significant sources of heterogeneity, accounted for 77.57% of the heterogeneity across studies.

Conclusions

Evidence in this review suggests that gestational diabetes mellitus were common among women with polycystic ovary syndrome. More research is needed to found effective interventions for preventing gestational diabetes mellitus among women with polycystic ovary syndrome.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

The incidence of diabetes mellitus (DM) is increasing across the world. This is also the case for diabetes in pregnancy women – gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) [1]. In contrast to overt diabetes mellitus, gestational diabetes mellitus is defined as any degree of glucose intolerance with onset or first recognition during pregnancy, perhaps from exaggerated physiologic changes in glucose metabolism [2, 3]. The available evidence suggests that GDM was associated with adverse outcomes for mothers and offspring in the short or long term [4,5,6]. Also, evidence indicated that GDM is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality for both mothers and infants worldwide [7]. There are a range of epidemiological studies showing that gestational diabetes mellitus is quite prevalent over the world [7,8,9,10], the prevalence ranged from 5.40% to 14.80%.

As one of the most common endocrine disorder affecting women during the reproductive years, polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a syndrome of ovarian dysfunction characterized by chronic anovulation, hyperandrogenism, and typical morphologic changes of the ovaries based on ultrasonographic examination [11,12,13]. The prevalence of PCOS is estimated to be 5.00%-14.00% among women during the reproductive years [14,15,16], and affected patients often present with symptoms and signs of menstrual irregularity, obesity and infertility [2]. Previous studies have indicated that women with PCOS are at an increased risk of developing GDM [17,18,19,20,21,22]. When women developed with both PCOS and GDM, they may be at a higher risk of developing adverse pregnancy outcomes [23]. It is said that women with both PCOS and GDM have a higher risk of developing pregnancy induced hypertension and preeclampsia and of delivering preterm [24]. Furthermore, newborns of women with both PCOS and GDM may have an increased risk of developing neonatal hyperbilirubinemia [24], metabolic and cardiovascular diseases [25].

Although previous studies have shown that PCOS is a predictor of GDM, we do not know exactly how many PCOS patients may develop GDM. Currently, the incidence of GDM among women with PCOS varies greatly across studies, ranged from 4.12% to 59.50% [26, 27]. Besides, a lot of factors have been founded to be associated with the incidence of GDM among women with PCOS, such as age, overweight, obesity and smoking, but the results were not consistent between different researches [28,29,30,31]. The possible causes of the inconsistencies among current studies are unclear. In order to take effective measures to reduce the negative consequences caused by GDM and PCOS, there is a need for more accurate estimates of the incidence of GDM among women with PCOS, and to found the possible causes of the inconsistencies among the current studies. This study aimed at exploring the pooled incidence of GDM among women with PCOS, summarizing possible causes of the inconsistencies in the current estimates, try to provide a reference for prevention of GDM and PCOS in the future.

Methods

This review was reported in accordance with the PRISMA guideline and Meta-analyses Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines [32, 33]. See Supplementary data (Table S5 and Table S6) for the details.

Search strategy

Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), PubMed, the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, were independently searched for published articles by two reviewers (QZY and DQ), with no restrictions on language or date of publication up until 31 May 2021. The following search terms were used: ‘Polycystic Ovary Syndrome’ (including ‘Polycystic Ovary Syndrome’, ‘PCOS’, ‘polycystic ovarian syndrome’, ‘polycystic ovary disease’, ‘Ovarian Cysts’, ‘Stein Leventhal Syndrome’, and ‘poly cystic ovarian syndrome’.); “gestational diabetes mellitus” (including ‘gestational diabetes mellitus’, ‘gestational diabetes’, ‘GDM’, ‘gestational’, ‘insulin dependent diabetes’, ‘non-insulin dependent diabetes’ and ‘pregnancy-induced diabetes’); Longitudinal study (including ‘longitudinal study’, ‘longitudinal Survey’, ‘follow up study’, ‘cohort study’, ‘epidemiologic Studies’ and ‘observational study’). See Table S1 for the search strategy.

Eligibility criteria

If the studies meet the following criteria, they were included: (1) the study was longitudinal observational study; (2) the participants were woman with polycystic ovary syndrome; (3) information about incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus among women with polycystic ovary syndrome was provided; (4) the full article was written in Chinese or English. If the studies were meta-analysis, review, conference abstract, comments, or protocol, they were excluded.

Data extraction

The data extraction was conducted independently. By using standardized data extraction form, two reviewers (QZY and DQ) checked the titles of the search records, abstracts and full-texts of the initial search records independently with Endnote software (Endnote X9 were used during the data extraction). Data were extracted on country or area, the first author, publication year, sample size, mean age, mean BMI, percentage of overweight/obese patients, percentage of primigravida, percentage of smokers, tools used to identify GDM, incidence of GDM, and quality score of these included studies. Any discrepancies that emerged in the procedures were resolved by involving a third author (XL).

Quality assessment

Two reviewers (RZL and YXH) used the Cochrane’s “Tool to Assess Risk of Bias in Cohort Studies”, evaluated the methodological quality of these included studies, which has been widely used to evaluate the quality of observational studies [34].

The included researches were scored according to eight criteria, such as assessment of exposure, selection of exposed and non-exposed groups, the present of outcome of interest, adjustment of the confounding variables, assessment of possible confounding factors, assessment of outcomes, and follow-up of the research. The included studies were evaluated in relation to eight question using a 4-Likert scale, including “definitely no”, “probably/mostly no”, “definitely yes”, and “probably/mostly yes”. The quality of a study was considered high/acceptable if all domains were evaluated favorably (ie, “definitely yes” or “probably/mostly yes”).

Statistical analyses

When data were available for 3 or more studies, incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus was combined [35]. Quantitative subgroup analysis was performed when 4 or more studies were available [36]. All statistical analyses in this study were performed using the “meta” (4.13–0) and “metafor” package (2.4–0) of R version 4.0.0 [37]. Heterogeneity between the included studies was evaluated by the Cochran's Q test and quantified by I2 statistic [37, 38]. When the results of I2 greater than 50%, means moderate heterogeneity, and greater than 70% means high heterogeneity [36]. As the authors expected considerable heterogeneity, pooled incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus was calculated with the random effects model [39]. Based on random effects model (the DerSimonian and Laird method), the pooled incidence of GDM among women with PCOS was combined using Logit transformation method in the current study [38]. In order to compare the incidence of GDM from different studies, subgroup analysis was conducted. Previous research indicated that subgroup analyses and meta regression should be interpreted with caution [39], this study planned a priori to limit the subgroup analyses to a limited number of background characteristics, including area, mean age, mean body mass index (BMI), percentage of overweight/obese patients, percentage of primigravida, percentage of smoking patients, sample size, and quality score (see Table S4 for the details). The difference between those subgroups was evaluated using the Cochran's Q chi-square tests [37, 38]. The general linear (mixed-effects) meta-regression models were performed to explore potential moderators on the heterogeneity[37]. Freeman-Tukey double arcsine method were used when the meta-regression analyses were conducted. Publication bias was investigated by funnel plot and Egger's test [38]. To evaluate the consistency of these results, sensitivity analysis was performed by excluding studies one by one [38]. All the statistical tests were 2-sided, with a significance threshold of P < 0.05.

Results

Result of literature search

As reported in Fig. 1, 616 studies were identified. In those studies, 95 duplicates were excluded. By screening the titles and abstracts, 445 irrelevant studies were excluded. Based on the selection criteria, 76 potentially relevant full-text papers were assessed. Further, due to the following reasons: have no data on incidence of GDM among women with PCOS (n = 32); duplicate articles or results (n = 8); not observational study (n = 7); review or conference abstract (n = 4); unable to locate full text (n = 3), 54 studies were excluded. Finally, 22 eligible studies were included in this review. The reliability for the full-text review between the two reviewers (QZY and DQ) was rated as good (Kappa = 0.76) [40].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow of studies through review

Full size image

Characteristics of the included studies

The characteristics of the 22 included studies [1, 26, 27, 41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59] were presented in Table 1. Eighteen of them were reported in English and 4 were reported in Chinese. Most of the included studies were from European and Asia, such as Finland and China. From the 22 studies, 9 (40.91%) studies were rated as high or acceptable quality and 13 (59.09%) were rated as low quality. Specifically, most studies have clear inclusion criteria for the patients and most of them used reliable assessment criteria to diagnose GDM. However, a few of the included studies failed to clarify whether baseline GDM patients were excluded from incidence calculations. In addition, 59.09% (13/22) of the included studies with a sample size ≤ 300. Details of the quality assessments for the 22 included papers are reported in Table S2 and Table S3.

Table 1 study characteristics of included studies
Full size table

Pooled incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus among women with polycystic ovary syndrome

A total of 22 studies reported incidence of GDM among women with PCOS. The forest plot was showed in Fig. 2 depicts the details. In the 22 studies, 24,574 women with polycystic ovary syndrome were included, of which 4478 were identified with GDM. The random effects model was used to calculate the pooled incidence (I2 = 98.80%, P < 0.001) in this review, and the pooled incidence of GDM among women with PCOS was 20.64%, with a 95% CI of 14.64% to 28.30%.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Forest plots of the included studies

Full size image

The results of subgroup analysis

The results of subgroup analyses were showed in Table 2. Significant differences in the incidence of GDM between different age was found (P = 0.040). The results indicated that older PCOS patients showed higher incidence of GDM, younger participants (with a mean age ≤ 25) showed lowest incidence of GDM (6.98%). Although no significant difference in the incidence of GDM between different BMI group was found (P = 0.021), the results indicated that studies with higher percentage of overweight/obese patients showed higher incidence of GDM (P < 0.001). In addition, we found that studies with higher percentage of primigravida (> 30%) showed higher incidence of GDM (P < 0.001). Also, studies with higher percentage of smoking patients (> 10%) showed higher incidence of GDM (P = 0.044).

Table 2 The results of subgroup analysis
Full size table

No significant differences in the incidence of GDM between different area was found (P = 0.255). Also, no significant differences in the incidence of GDM between different income group was found (P = 0.783). Additionally, significant difference in the incidence of GDM between included studies with different sample size was found, studies with bigger sample size (> 300) showed lower incidence of GDM (P = 0.038). For studies with different quality, the incidence of GDM in high-quality researches is lower than that of low-quality researches. However, the difference was not significant (P = 0.081). There was no significant difference between studies used different assessment tools (P = 0.115).

The results of meta-regression analyses

The results of meta-regression analyses were reported in Table 3. Due to too many missing data on the percentage of overweight/obese patients, percentage of primigravida, percentage of smoking patients, this review was unable to include those variables in the regression model. The results of bivariate meta-regression indicated that higher incidence estimates reported in studies with smaller sample (β =  − 0.19, p = 0.041). Specifically, sample size accounted for 20.15% of the heterogeneity across the included studies. Also, studies which used ADA criteria as assessment tool showed higher incidence estimates (β =  − 0.21, p = 0.043). Specifically, sample size accounted for 22.11% of the heterogeneity across those included studies. Besides, area (β = -0.04, p = 0.676), quality score (β = -0.08, p = 0.422), mean BMI (β = 0.02, p = 0.513) and mean age (β = -0.06, p = 0.516) were not significant moderators.

Table 3 The results of meta-regression analysis
Full size table

In the multivariate regression model, area (β = -0.24, p = 0.011), quality score of included studies (β = -0.12, p = 0.039), sample size (β = -0.39, p < 0.001) and mean age (β = -0.08, p = 0.028) were found as significant moderators for the heterogeneity (P < 0.05), accounted for 77.57% of the heterogeneity across studies.

The results of sensitivity analysis and publication bias

When each study was excluded one-by-one, no significant changes were found among the recalculated combined incidences. The pooled incidence of GDM among PCOS patients ranged from 19.31% (95% CI: 13.78%-26.37%) to 22.44% (95% CI: 16.44%-26.86%), and the I2 statistic has ranged from 98.00% to 98.90%. The results in the current study indicate that no individual study significantly influenced the overall results. See Fig S1 for the details.

The funnel plot of publication bias is basically symmetric, but publication bias in this study cannot be ruled out based on it, so the Egger's test was performed. The results of the Egger's test indicated that publication bias was not exist in this study (t = 0.362, p = 0.721). See Fig. 3 for more details.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Funnel plot of publication bias

Full size image

Discussion

Key findings

A total of 24,574 women with polycystic ovary syndrome were included in the 22 studies, of which 4478 were identified with gestational diabetes mellitus. The pooled incidence of GDM among women with PCOS was 20.64%, with a 95% CI of 14.64% to 28.30%. In the meta regression analyses, several variables including age, area, quality score and sample size were identified as significant factors of heterogeneity, accounted for 77.57% of the heterogeneity across studies.

Comparison with the literature

Previous study showed that the incidence of GDM among women with PCOS varies greatly across studies, ranged from 4.12% to 59.50%. The results in this study found that the pooled incidence of GDM among women with PCOS was 20.64%, provided a relatively accurate estimate, which may helpful for prevention of GDM and PCOS in the future. Based on the results of previous studies, the incidence of GDM in the general population was 4.40%-16.20% around the world [30, 60,61,62]. The pooled incidence of GDM among women with PCOS was 20.64%, which was much higher than the general population of pregnant women. This result suggests that more precautions should be taken against the occurrence of GDM in PCOS patients.

In the subgroup analysis, the incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus in older polycystic ovary syndrome patients was significantly higher than the younger patients, which was consistent with other researches [63]. The risk of GDM increases linearly with age, which has been reported in the previous literature. The mechanism of the association between maternal age and GDM is not yet clear. High level of insulin resistance, high levels of circulating adipokines and inflammatory markers as well as oxidative stress may partly explain this phenomenon [64, 65]. In addition, we also found that the incidence of GDM among PCOS patients declined a lot after 35 years of age in the subgroup analysis, and after controlling for other factors, the results of the regression model showed that older age was associated with lower incidence of GDM. This result indicated that the occurrence of PCOS among PCOS patients cannot be simply attributed to maternal age. Thus, the association between age and the incidence of GDM in the current review needs further exploration.

Several studies have showed associations between overweight/obesity and the development of GDM among pregnant women [7, 30, 61, 66]. In the current study, association between overweight/obesity and the incidence of GDM was significant in the univariate analysis. When controlled the influence of other factors in the multivariate analysis, the difference is no longer significant. In addition, our study showed that higher percentage of primigravida was associated with high incidence of GDM. The possible reason is that primigravida have no experience for gestation, it is more difficult for them to stay healthy during pregnancy. Due to too many missing data, this variable could not be included in the meta-regression model. Therefore, this observation needs further clarification. Smoking during pregnancy is said to be associated with an increased risk of GDM [67]. A possible explanation of the association is the effect of smoking on increased oxidative stress, inflammation, hyperglycemia, and insulin resistance, but the exact mechanism of action is yet to be determined [68]. In the current study, smoking during pregnancy is associated with an increased risk for GDM among PCOS patients too. Due to too many missing data, smoking could not be included in the meta regression model, the current results may be required further exploration.

There was significant difference between different regions in the meta-regression model, we have no clear reason for such a discrepancy, but we speculate that it may due to differences in the ethnic background [7]. Considering that none of the included studies were conducted in low-income countries, which may be related to the number of studies, we believe that more studies are needed in low-income countries to understand the full picture of GDM in PCOS patients. Furthermore, we found that the pooled incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus among polycystic ovary syndrome patients identified by different assessment tools was not significant. To date, the criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) screening and diagnosis are controversial around the world, different countries use different diagnostic criteria to determine the incidence of GDM [69]. Inconsistencies in the GDM screening strategy between different guidelines have led to challenges in estimating the incidence, future study is needed to explore international standards for the ascertainment of GDM. It is reported that studies with poor methodological quality and small sample size usually yielded more extreme results [70], the current review observed similar results, studies with small sample size and poorer methodological quality reported higher incidence of GDM.

Implications for the future

During the process of screening data, we found that there were relatively few data on incidence of GDM among PCOS patients. Of the 22 included studies, 13 (59.09%) were rated as low quality and 59.09% of the included studies with a sample size ≤ 300. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct a large multi-center prospective research in the future, use a validated measure of GDM in randomly selected PCOS patients. This kind of study should measure possible confounding factors in the future, which will provide a more accurate incidence of GDM among PCOS patients. Currently, the results of some studies reported that dietary or combined lifestyle measures have not indicated too much improvements in the risk of developing GDM. Besides, those studies involving physical activity programs have yielded conflicting results [71]. Given the great potential for reducing the disease burden of PCOS patients, future research should continue to identify interventions that can be easily implemented in patients with PCOS, especially during their preconception period. Additionally, due to lack of data in many subgroups, we were unable to perform meta regression analysis for some possible confounders, such as socioeconomic status, family history of GDM, physical activity, drinking and diet habit [6, 54]. Accordingly, there might be considerable uncertainty regarding the pooled incidence of GDM among PCOS patients. Future researchers should explore more potential risk factors for GDM among PCOS patients, especially genetic background as well as health-related behavior or other concomitant chronic diseases.

Limitations

Although a protocol was conducted before the review was started, the protocol was not published or registered, which is a limitation of this study. Subgroup analyses and meta regression were conducted to control many factors for the pooled incidence of GDM among PCOS patients, however, heterogeneity was found in the current study. Previous studies have demonstrated that heterogeneity is very difficult to avoid in meta-analysis of observational studies [72]. Besides, papers not written in English or Chinese were excluded, which is also a limitation of this review. Additionally, although this review included studies across 11 countries / areas, most of the eligible articles were conducted in high income countries/areas, no study was conducted in low-income country/area. Considering the inconsistency of the economic status and health care environment worldwide, more incidence studies in low-income countries/areas are needed to understand the full picture of GDM among PCOS patients. Also, we noticed that the included studies covering a vast range of clinical and diagnostic criteria and practice changes [63]. It is possible that the pooled incidence of GDM among PCOS patients was influenced by the changes of threshold value to identify GDM. Thus, we think ongoing surveillance is essential.

Conclusion

A total of 24,574 women with polycystic ovary syndrome were included in the 22 studies, of which 4478 were identified with gestational diabetes mellitus. The pooled incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus among women with polycystic ovary syndrome was 20.64%, with a 95% CI of 14.64% to 28.30%. In the meta regression analyses, several variables including age, area, quality score and sample size were found as significant sources of heterogeneity, accounted for 77.57% of the heterogeneity across studies. More study is needed to explore possible risk factors for GDM and identify effective strategies for preventing GDM among PCOS patients.

Availability of data and materials

Data supporting the findings of this review were presented in Table 1 and Supplementary Data.

Abbreviations

DM:

Diabetes mellitus

GDM:

Gestational diabetes mellitus

PCOS:

Polycystic ovary syndrome

BMI:

Body mass index

CI:

Confidence interval

WHO:

World Health Organization

ADA:

American Diabetes Association

IADPSG criteria:

International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups criteria

References

  1. Helseth R, Vanky E, Salvesen O, Carlsen SM. Gestational diabetes mellitus among Norwegian women with polycystic ovary syndrome: prevalence and risk factors according to the WHO and the modified IADPSG criteria. Eur J Endocrinol. 2013;169(1):65–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Eroglu D, Zeyneloglu HB. Metabolic disorders in patients with recent gestational diabetes mellitus. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2006;32(4):408–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pan ML, Chen LR, Tsao HM, Chen KH. Relationship between Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome and Subsequent Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Nationwide Population-Based Study. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(10): e0140544.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sawada M, Masuyama H, Hayata K, Kamada Y, Nakamura K, Hiramatsu Y. Pregnancy complications and glucose intolerance in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Endocr J. 2015;62(11):1017–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Palomba S, Falbo A, Russo T, Rivoli L, Orio M, Cosco AG, Vero R, Capula C, Tolino A, Zullo F, et al. The risk of a persistent glucose metabolism impairment after gestational diabetes mellitus is increased in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. Diabetes Care. 2012;35(4):861–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Kjerulff LE, Sanchez-Ramos L, Duffy D. Pregnancy outcomes in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204(6):558e551-556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee KW, Ching SM, Ramachandran V, Yee A, Hoo FK, Chia YC, Wan Sulaiman WA, Suppiah S, Mohamed MH, Veettil SK. Prevalence and risk factors of gestational diabetes mellitus in Asia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18(1):494.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Eades CE, Cameron DM, Evans JMM. Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus in Europe: A meta-analysis. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017;129:173–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gao C, Sun X, Lu L, Liu F, Yuan J. Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus in mainland China: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Diabetes Investig. 2019;10(1):154–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. N DMP. Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS). Int J Pharm Res Technol. 2018;8(2):48–50.

  11. Hart R. Polycystic ovarian syndrome–prognosis and treatment outcomes. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2007;19(6):529–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dunaif A. Insulin resistance and the polycystic ovary syndrome: mechanism and implications for pathogenesis. Endocr Rev. 1997;18(6):774–800.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rotterdam EA-SPcwg. Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Hum Reprod. 2004;19(1):41–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Asuncion M, Calvo RM, San Millan JL, Sancho J, Avila S, Escobar-Morreale HF. A prospective study of the prevalence of the polycystic ovary syndrome in unselected Caucasian women from Spain. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85(7):2434–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Eilertsen TB, Vanky E, Carlsen SM. Increased prevalence of diabetes and polycystic ovary syndrome in women with a history of preterm birth: a case-control study. BJOG. 2012;119(3):266–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Khorshidi A, Azami M, Tardeh S, Tardeh Z. The prevalence of metabolic syndrome in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2019;13(4):2747–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Altieri P, Gambineri A, Prontera O, Cionci G, Franchina M, Pasquali R. Maternal polycystic ovary syndrome may be associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;149(1):31–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ghazeeri GS, Nassar AH, Younes Z, Awwad JT. Pregnancy outcomes and the effect of metformin treatment in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: an overview. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012;91(6):658–78.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Iavazzo C, Vitoratos N. Polycystic ovarian syndrome and pregnancy outcome. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2010;282(3):235–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lambrinoudaki I. Cardiovascular risk in postmenopausal women with the polycystic ovary syndrome. Maturitas. 2011;68(1):13–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Reyes-Munoz E, Castellanos-Barroso G, Ramirez-Eugenio BY, Ortega-Gonzalez C, Parra A, Castillo-Mora A, De la Jara-Diaz JF. The risk of gestational diabetes mellitus among Mexican women with a history of infertility and polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2012;97(6):1467–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Toulis KA, Goulis DG, Kolibianakis EM, Venetis CA, Tarlatzis BC, Papadimas I. Risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2009;92(2):667–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fougner SL, Vanky E, Lovvik TS, Carlsen SM. No impact of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy complications in women with PCOS, regardless of GDM criteria used. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(7): e0254895.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Alshammari A, Hanley A, Ni A, Tomlinson G, Feig DS. Does the presence of polycystic ovary syndrome increase the risk of obstetrical complications in women with gestational diabetes? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010;23(6):545–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Boutzios G, Livadas S, Piperi C, Vitoratos N, Adamopoulos C, Hassiakos D, Iavazzo C, Diamanti-Kandarakis E. Polycystic ovary syndrome offspring display increased oxidative stress markers comparable to gestational diabetes offspring. Fertil Steril. 2013;99(3):943–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hu SQ, Xu B, Long R, Jin L. The effect of polycystic ovary syndrome without hyperandrogenism on pregnancy-related outcomes: a retrospective cohort study. Bjog-Int J Obstet Gy. 2021;128(6):1003–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. De Frene V, Vansteelandt S, T’Sjoen G, Gerris J, Somers S, Vercruysse L, De Sutter P. A retrospective study of the pregnancy, delivery and neonatal outcome in overweight versus normal weight women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(10):2333–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang JW, Cao SS, Hu RY, Wang M. Association between cigarette smoking during pregnancy and gestational diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;33(5):758–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Liu L, Wang H, Zhang Y, Niu J, Li Z, Tang R. Effect of pregravid obesity on perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies following in vitro fertilization and the weight-loss goals to reduce the risks of poor pregnancy outcomes: a retrospective cohort study. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(2):e0227766.

  30. Han Q, Shao P, Leng J, Zhang C, Li W, Liu G, Zhang Y, Li Y, Li Z, Ren Y, et al. Interactions between general and central obesity in predicting gestational diabetes mellitus in Chinese pregnant women: A prospective population-based study in Tianjin. China J Diabetes. 2018;10(1):59–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Nouri M, Sohaei S, Shalaby MN, Mehrabani S, Ramezani A, Faghih S. Effect of curcumin on body mass index and glycemic indices in females with PCOS: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial. Nutri Food Sci. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1108/NFS-11-2021-0334.

  32. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009;339: b2535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, Moher D, Becker BJ, Sipe TA, Thacker SB. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA. 2000;283(15):2008–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Virtanen M, Jokela M, Madsen IE, Magnusson Hanson LL, Lallukka T, Nyberg ST, Alfredsson L, Batty GD, Bjorner JB, Borritz M, et al. Long working hours and depressive symptoms: systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies and unpublished individual participant data. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018;44(3):239–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ades AE, Lu G, Higgins JPT. The interpretation of random-effects meta-analysis in decision models. Med Decis Making. 2005;25(6):646–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327(7414):557–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Yan Q, Qiu D, Liu X, Guo X, Hu Y. Prevalence of Smell or Taste Dysfunction Among Children With COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Pediatr. 2021;9: 686600.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.2 (updated February 2021). Cochrane; 2021. Available from www.training.cochrane.org/handbook.

  39. Qiu D, Li Y, Li L, He J, Ouyang F, Xiao S. Prevalence of post-traumatic stress symptoms among people influenced by coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak: A meta-analysis. Eur Psychiatry. 2021;64(1): e30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Sands ML, Murphy JR. Use of kappa statistic in determining validity of quality filtering for meta-analysis: A case study of the health effects of electromagnetic radiation. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996;49(9):1045–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Xia H, Zhang R, Sun X, Wang L, Zhang W. Valuable predictors of gestational diabetes mellitus in infertile Chinese women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a prospective cohort study. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2017;33(6):448–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. West S, Ollila MM, Franks S, Piltonen T, Jokelainen J, Nevalainen J, Puukka K, Ruokonen A, Jarvelin MR, Auvinen J, et al. Overweight, obesity and hyperandrogenemia are associated with gestational diabetes mellitus: A follow-up cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020;99(10):1311–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Weerakiet S, Srisombut C, Rojanasakul A, Panburana P, Thakkinstian A, Herabutya Y. Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus and pregnancy outcomes in Asian women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2004;19(3):134–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Roos N, Kieler H, Sahlin L, Ekman-Ordeberg G, Falconer H, Stephansson O. Risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: population based cohort study. BMJ. 2011;343: d6309.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Mills G, Badeghiesh A, Suarthana E, Baghlaf H, Dahan MH. Polycystic ovary syndrome as an independent risk factor for gestational diabetes and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: a population-based study on 9.1 million pregnancies. Hum Reprod. 2020;35(7):1666–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Li G, Huang W, Zhang L, Tian Z, Zheng W, Wang T, Zhang T, Zhang W. A prospective cohort study of early-pregnancy risk factors for gestational diabetes in polycystic ovarian syndrome. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2018;34(5): e3003.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Kakoly NS, Earnest A, Moran LJ, Teede HJ, Joham AE. Group-based developmental BMI trajectories, polycystic ovary syndrome, and gestational diabetes: a community-based longitudinal study. BMC Med. 2017;15(1):195.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Foroozanfard F, Asemi Z, Bazarganipour F, Taghavi SA, Allan H, Aramesh S. Comparing pregnancy, childbirth, and neonatal outcomes in women with different phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome and healthy women: a prospective cohort study. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2020;36(1):61–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Feichtinger M, Linder T, Rosicky I, Eppel D, Schatten C, Eppel W, et al. Maternal overweight vs. polycystic ovary syndrome: disentangling their impact on insulin action in pregnancy-a prospective study. J Clin Med 2021;10(35):1–7.

  50. de Wilde MA, Veltman-Verhulst SM, Goverde AJ, Lambalk CB, Laven JS, Franx A, Koster MP, Eijkemans MJ, Fauser BC. Preconception Predictors of Gestational Diabetes: A Prospective Cohort Study on the Predominant Complication of Pregnancy in PCOS. Reprod Sci. 2014;21(3):126a–126a.

    Google Scholar 

  51. de Wilde MA, Goverde AJ, Veltman-Verhulst SM, Eijkemans MJ, Franx A, Fauser BC, Koster MP. Insulin action in women with polycystic ovary syndrome and its relation to gestational diabetes. Hum Reprod. 2015;30(6):1447–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Chen ZJ, Shi Y, Sun Y, Zhang B, Liang X, Cao Y, Yang J, Liu J, Wei D, Weng N, et al. Fresh versus Frozen Embryos for Infertility in the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(6):523–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Bond R, Pace R, Rahme E, Dasgupta K. Diabetes risk in women with gestational diabetes mellitus and a history of polycystic ovary syndrome: a retrospective cohort study. Diabetic Med. 2017;34(12):1684–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Bahri Khomami M, Moran LJ, Kenny L, Grieger JA, Myers J, Poston L, McCowan L, Walker J, Dekker G, Norman R, et al. Lifestyle and pregnancy complications in polycystic ovary syndrome: The SCOPE cohort study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2019;90(6):814–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Ashrafi M, Sheikhan F, Arabipoor A, Hosseini R, Nourbakhsh F, Zolfaghari Z. Gestational diabetes mellitus risk factors in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;181:195–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Li X. Incidence and Clinical Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes in Patients with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Maternal & Child Health Care of China. 2018;33(10):2226–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Zhuo-hui Z. Analysis of obstetric complications and risk factors in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Chinese Journal Of Family Planning & Gynecotokology. 2017;9(12):9–12.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Da-yan L, Wen-jie Z, Zhi-hong F, Xue-mei L. Metabolism characteristics during pregnancy and its influence on perinatal outcomes in obese or non-obese women with polycystic ovarian syndrome. J Reprod Med. 2015;24(5):363–7.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Congcong S, Peng J. Analysis of risk factors for gestational diabetes mellitus in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. China Modern Doctor. 2020;58(4):57–9.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Wang Y, Chen L, Xiao K, Horswell R, Besse J, Johnson J, Ryan DH, Hu G. Increasing incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus in Louisiana, 1997–2009. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2012;21(3):319–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Rajab KE, Issa AA, Hasan ZA, Rajab E, Jaradat AA. Incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus in Bahrain from 2002 to 2010. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012;117(1):74–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Krej H, Simjak P, Anderlova K, Benakova H, Parizek A, Krejci V, Skrha J. The incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus before and after the introduction of HAPO diagnostic criteria. Ces Gynekol. 2019;84(6):404–11.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Li Y, Ren X, He L, Li J, Zhang S, Chen W. Maternal age and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis of over 120 million participants. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2020;162: 108044.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Shin D, Song WO. Prepregnancy body mass index is an independent risk factor for gestational hypertension, gestational diabetes, preterm labor, and small- and large-for-gestational-age infants. J Matern-Fetal Neo M. 2015;28(14):1679–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Fontana L, Eagon JC, Trujillo ME, Scherer PE, Klein S. Visceral fat adipokine secretion is associated with systemic inflammation in obese humans. Diabetes. 2007;56(4):1010–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Anagnostis P, Paparodis RD, Bosdou JK, Bothou C, Macut D, Goulis DG, Livadas S. Risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus in polycystic ovary syndrome is associated with obesity: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Endocrine. 2021;74(2):245–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Masalin S, Kautiainen H, Gissler M, Pennanen P, Eriksson JG, Laine MK. Impact of smoking on gestational diabetes mellitus and offspring birthweight in primiparous women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020;99(12):1632–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Maddatu J, Anderson-Baucum E, Evans-Molina C. Smoking and the risk of type 2 diabetes. Transl Res. 2017;184:101–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Saccone G, Khalife A, Al-Kouatly HB, Sendek K, Berghella V. Screening for gestational diabetes mellitus: one step versus two step approach. A meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;33(9):1616–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Mata DA, Ramos MA, Bansal N, Khan R, Guille C, Di Angelantonio E, Sen S. Prevalence of Depression and Depressive Symptoms Among Resident Physicians: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA. 2015;314(22):2373–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Agha-Jaffar R, Oliver N, Johnston D, Robinson S. Gestational diabetes mellitus: does an effective prevention strategy exist? Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2016;12(9):533–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Winsper C, Ganapathy R, Marwaha S, Large M, Birchwood M, Singh SP. A systematic review and meta-regression analysis of aggression during the First Episode of Psychosis. Acta Psychiat Scand. 2013;128(6):413–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None

Funding

This study was supported by the Pharmaceutical Association of Hunan (Grant NO: Hn201707) and the Health Commission of Hunan Province (Grant NO: B2017167). The funding agencies did not take part in the design of this review and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pharmacy, Xiangtan Central Hospital, Hunan, China

    Qingzi Yan, Xiang Liu, Qichang Xing, Renzhu Liu & Yixiang Hu

  2. Department of Social Medicine and Health Management, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China

    Dan Qiu

Authors
  1. Qingzi Yan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dan Qiu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiang Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Qichang Xing
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Renzhu Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yixiang Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

QZY, DQ, XL and QCX contributed to the design of this study. QZY and DQ screened the full text. DQ and QZY extracted and conducted the data analysis. RZL and YXH conducted the quality assessment. QZY wrote the first draft of the manuscript with input from DQ. All the authors approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qingzi Yan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of Central South University. Written informed consent was obtained before interviews were conducted.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

None

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visithttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yan, Q., Qiu, D., Liu, X. et al. The incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus among women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 22, 370 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04690-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04690-3

Keywords

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

ISSN: 1471-2393

Contact us