Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Childbirth care in Egypt: a repeat cross-sectional analysis using Demographic and Health Surveys between 1995 and 2014 examining use of care, provider mix and immediate postpartum care content

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth volume 20, Article number: 46 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Egypt has achieved important reductions in maternal and neonatal mortality and experienced increases in the proportion of births attended by skilled professionals. However, substandard care has been highlighted as one of the avoidable causes behind persisting maternal deaths. This paper describes changes over time in the use of childbirth care in Egypt, focusing on location and sector of provision (public versus private) and the content of immediate postpartum care.

Methods

We used five Demographic and Health Surveys conducted in Egypt between 1995 and 2014 to explore national and regional trends in childbirth care. To assess content of care in 2014, we calculated the caesarean section rate and the percentage of women delivering in a facility who reported receiving four components of immediate postpartum care for themselves and their newborn.

Results

Between 1995 and 2014, the percentage of women delivering in health facilities increased from 35 to 87% and women delivering with a skilled birth attendant from 49 to 92%. The percentage of women delivering in a private facility nearly quadrupled from 16 to 63%. In 2010–2014, fewer than 2% of women delivering in public or private facilities received all four immediate postpartum care components measured.

Conclusions

Egypt achieved large increases in the percentage of women delivering in facilities and with skilled birth attendants. However, most women and newborns did not receive essential elements of high quality immediate postpartum care. The large shift to private facilities may highlight failures of public providers to meet women’s expectations. Additionally, the content (quality) of childbirth care needs to improve in both sectors. Immediate action is required to understand and address the drivers of poor quality, including insufficient resources, perverse incentives, poor compliance and enforcement of existing standards, and providers’ behaviours moving between private and public sectors. Otherwise, Egypt risks undermining the benefits of high coverage because of substandard quality childbirth care.

Peer Review reports

Background

Although substantial progress was made to meet the Millennium Development Goals, maternal and perinatal mortality remain unacceptably high in most low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Globally, the largest burden of maternal deaths occurs during labor, delivery and the immediate postnatal period, namely the peripartum period [1], and similar patterns hold for babies. The preventive and curative interventions that improve maternal and perinatal survival are known and supported by rigorous evidence. It was thought that improving access to and utilisation of facility-based childbirth care had an important role to play in reducing preventable maternal and perinatal deaths [2, 3]. However, increasing evidence highlights that poor quality facility-based care challenges this assumption [4,5,6].

Egypt’s population is estimated to have reached 99 million people [7] and, after years of decline, its total fertility rate increased from 3.0 in 2008 to 3.5 in 2014 [8]. Despite potential reductions in the fertility rate more recently [9], the country’s health system has had to provide care for an increasing number of births. For example, there were an estimated 2.7 million births in 2014, a 46% increase from 1.9 million in 2006 [10]. Although Egypt’s maternal mortality ratio decreased from 174 per 100,000 live births in 1992 to 37 in 2017 [11, 12], and its neonatal mortality rate from 31 per 1000 live births in 1992 to 12 in 2017 [13], around 960 maternal and 30,000 neonatal deaths occur annually. Thanks to a high density population concentrated along the banks of the river Nile and in the Nile delta and the development of a large network of health facilities, distance and lack of transport were rarely identified as avoidable factors for maternal death in Egypt [11, 14, 15]. In contrast, substandard care by the obstetric team, absence or poor quality of antenatal care, and delays in recognising problems and seeking care were identified as the most important avoidable causes of maternal death [14, 16]. Moreover, large socio-economic disparities in the utilisation of facility-based childbirth care continue to exist [17].

Healthcare in Egypt is provided by a broad spectrum of modern and traditional health care providers, ranging from governmental, parastatal, university, military, for-profit, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and traditional practitioners, with variable quality and cost [18, 19]. The Ministry of Health and Population (MOHP) is a major provider of primary, preventive and curative care, and has an oversight responsibility (but limited authority and capacity) to regulate private providers. During the period between 2007 and 2016, Egypt had 8 physicians and 14 nurses and midwives per 10,000 population [20]. A high proportion of health expenditure - 62% in 2016 - came from out-of-pocket payments [21], with only 8.1% of women aged 15 to 49 years covered by some form of public or private health insurance in 2014 [22]. Childbirth care in public hospitals is provided under three pricing schemes – public, iqtisady (for patients enrolled with the health insurance organization, the HIO), and fondoqy (“hotel” or private service, which enables obstetricians to admit and attend private-practice patients).

In 2014, the percentage of women delivering with a skilled birth attendant (SBA) reached 92%, with 87% of women in the country delivering in a facility [22]. However, there is limited evidence on which sector is providing childbirth care, on quality of care, or on which women are being left behind in terms of coverage and quality. These aspects are crucial to understanding the status of childbirth care in Egypt and developing policies that will further improve the well-being of its women and children.

The objective of this paper is to describe the changes over time in the use of childbirth care in Egypt, focusing on the sector of provision (public versus private), and the content of this care, nationally and by region.

Methods

Data and study population

We used the five most recent Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) conducted in Egypt in 1995, 2000, 2005, 2008, and 2014. In analyses, we refer to the surveys using the span of their five-year recall periods for which details on women’s live births were collected (i.e., 1995 survey: 1991–1995). DHS are cross-sectional nationally representative household surveys with a multistage cluster sampling strategy. Their model questionnaires are adapted to each country’s circumstances and include questions on household and individual characteristics, fertility and family planning, maternal and child health and details on antenatal and childbirth care. All ever-married women aged 15–49 years with a live birth in the surveys’ five-year recall period were included in the analysis. We examined women’s self-report of childbirth care source and the components of immediate postpartum care for the most recent live birth.

Subnational regions

All five DHS used the same six major administrative regionsto produce subnational estimates: 1) Urban Governorates (four cities without rural populations: Cairo, Alexandria, Port Said, Suez), 2) urban Lower Egypt (ULE), 3) rural Lower Egypt (RLE), 4) urban Upper Egypt (UUE), 5) rural Upper Egypt (RUE), and 6) Frontier Governorates (Red Sea, New Valley, Matrouh, North Sinai and South Sinai governorates). Figure 1 depicts the 27 Egyptian governorates organised according to the DHS’ classification. In 2014, North and South Sinai were not surveyed for security reasons. While national estimates were not affected by this exclusion because only a small percentage of the total population (< 1%) resided there, the 2014 Frontier Governorates estimates should be compared to previous surveys with caution.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Map of Egypt’s governorates as classified in the Demographic and Health Surveys adapted using data from the Humanitarian Data Exchange (HDX) [23] under the CC BY-IGO license

Full size image

Definitions and analysis

Details on the indicators and definitions used in this study can be found in Additional file 1. In our analysis, we considered women to be in need of childbirth care if they had a live birth in the survey recall period [24]. Women were considered to have had a facility delivery if they reported giving birth in any health facility, and assisted by an SBA if they reported being assisted by a doctor, nurse or midwife. To assess the content of childbirth care, we used four components of immediate postpartum care as proxies. These included: 1) initiating breastfeeding within an hour of birth; 2) weighing the baby; 3) checking on the woman’s health while still in the facility; 4) reporting a minimally acceptable length-of-stay in the facility. We assessed the percentage of women reporting receiving each component and all components.

Analysis

We first calculated the percentage of women delivering in any health facility, with a SBA and in private facilities. Then, we assessed the percentage of women delivering in facilities by sector (public and private), in each region and by household wealth. We estimated the percentage of women receiving each of four components of immediate postpartum care and all four components, by sector of provision, type of residence, household wealth, mode of delivery (vaginal or caesarean (C)-section), and region. Data analysis was conducted in Stata SEv14 (College Station, TX), using the svyset command to account for survey design of each survey (sample weights, clustering and stratification). We used tabulations and Chi-square tests to provide descriptive statistics and assess the statistical significance of different distributions. We produced estimates for each survey separately (not pooled).

Results

Study population

In total, data on childbirth care use and key variables of interest were available for 45,387 women in need of care across the five surveys, of whom 28,968 delivered in a health facility. The characteristics of the study participants, stratified by survey year, are shown in Additional file 2, while percentages, 95% confidence intervals and p-values of the data used in Figs. 2, 3 and 4 can be found in Additional file 3.

National trends in total and private childbirth care use between 1995 and 2014

Between 1991 and 1995 and 2010–2014, the percentage of all women in need of childbirth care who delivered in a facility increased from 35 to 87%; the percentage who delivered in private sector facilities over the same time periods increased from 16 to 63% (Fig. 2) and the percentage of women assisted by an SBA increased from 49 to 92%. On all five surveys, over 99% of women delivering in facilities reported being attended by a doctor. Among women who gave birth at home, the percentage being attended by an SBA increased from 22 to 37% over the study period. Among women delivering at home with an SBA in 2010–2014, 37% were attended by a doctor and 63% by a nurse or midwife.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Percentage of women in need of childbirth care delivering in a facility, delivering in a private facility and delivering assisted by an SBA between 1991 and 1995 and 2010–2014

Full size image

National and regional change in facility-based childbirth and type of provider between 1995 and 2014

The percentage of women in need of childbirth care who delivered at home (regardless of birth attendant type) decreased in all regions between 1991 and 1995 and 2010–2014 (Fig. 3). We observed the largest absolute percentage reductions in Rural Lower Egypt (RLE) and Rural Upper Egypt (RUE): 65 and 62 percentage points (pp), respectively. Among all women in need of childbirth care, the percentage giving birth in public facilities increased in RLE (6 pp), RUE (16 pp), Urban Upper Egypt (UUE) (16 pp) and Frontier governorates (18 pp) and decreased in Urban governorates (2 pp) and Urban Lower Egypt (ULE) (1 pp). The share of childbirth care occurring in private facilities increased in all regions. The largest increases were observed in RLE (59 pp) and RUE (46 pp).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Percentage of women in need of childbirth care between 1991 and 1995 and 2010–2014, by location, attendant and sector, by region

Full size image

Time trends in the use of public and private facility-based childbirth care by wealth quintile

Among women in need of childbirth care from the two poorest quintiles, the percentage delivering in a public facility increased from 8% in 1991–1995 to 25% in 2010–2014, while the percentage delivering in a private facility rose from 5 to 51% (Fig. 4). Among women from the two wealthiest quintiles, 29% of women reported delivering in public facilities in 1991–1995, which remained virtually unchanged at 27% in 2010–2014, while the percentage who reported delivering in a private facility increased from 31% in 1005 to 69% in 2010–2014.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Percentage of women in need of childbirth care that delivered in a public or a private facility, stratified by household wealth

Full size image

Time trends and sector differences in type of birth

The percentage of women delivering by a C-section increased from 7% of all live births in 1991–1995 to 54% in 2010–2014, and from 20% of facility births to 62% during the same time periods (Table 1). Among women delivering in public facilities, the percentage delivering by C-section increased from 19 to 49%, compared to 22 and 67% of women delivering in private facilities. For women from the poorest 40% of households, the percentage of all births by C-section increased from 3 to 43%. For the wealthiest 40%, it increased from 13 to 64%.

Table 1 Percentage of livebirths by C-section between 1991 and 1995 and 2010–2014 across women delivering in a facility, all women and type of provider and household wealth
Full size table

Differences in the components of immediate postpartum care between public and private facilities

Table 2 shows the four components of immediate postpartum care measured in the 2014 DHS. Of these, having the minimum acceptable length of stay was the least commonly reported care component in both public and private facilities (14 and 5%, respectively, p-value< 0.001). This was followed by immediate initiation of breastfeeding (29 and 24%, p-value< 0.001). In contrast, being checked before discharge was almost universal (89 and 92%, p-value< 0.001). In total, 2% of women received all four components in public facilities, compared to 1% of women in private facilities (p-value = 0.001).

Table 2 Percentage of women delivering in public and private facilities reporting receiving each component of immediate postpartum care and all components, by type of residence, household wealth and type of delivery on the 2014 Egypt DHS
Full size table

Looking at differences by residence, we found that in urban areas, 68% of women delivering in public facilities reported their babies were weighed, compared to 75% in private (p-value = 0.002). In urban areas, 14% of women delivering in public facilities reported an acceptable length of stay, compared to 6% in private (p-value< 0.001). In rural areas, women delivering in public facilities reported their babies weighed less commonly (57%) than in private (66%, p-value< 0.001). A higher percentage of rural women receiving childbirth care reported breastfeeding within an hour of birth (31% public, 25% private, p-value< 0.001) and an acceptable length of stay (14% public, 5% private, p-value< 0.001).

Among users of public facilities, poorer women more commonly reported their babies were breastfed within an hour of birth (30%) compared to wealthier women (23%, p-value = 0.002). They were more likely to report a minimally acceptable length of stay (16%, wealthier women: 5%, p-value< 0.001). In contrast, poorer women delivering in private facilities more often reported their babies were weighed (59%) than wealthier women (52%, p-value = 0.002). Among women delivering in private facilities, wealthier women were more likely to report a minimum acceptable length of stay (13%) compared to poorest women (6%, p-value< 0.001).

Among women with vaginal births, those delivering in the public sector were more likely to have breastfed their newborn within an hour of birth (40%) compared to 36% in the private sector (p-value = 0.045) and to have had an acceptable length of stay (18% in public and 11% in private, p-value< 0.001). For having their baby weighted, the reverse pattern was seen: lower in public (55%) compared to private sector (63%). The sectors did not differ in the percentage of women checked before discharge.

Among women with a C-section, the content of care did not differ between the sectors except for the percentage reporting an acceptable length of stay, which was higher in public facilities (9%) than in private (2%, p-value< 0.001).

Across the six regions, having the baby weighed was the component with the largest absolute gap in provision, with 30 pp. between ULE and Frontier governorates for women delivering in public facilities and 25 pp. between frontier governorates and RUE in private (Fig. 5). This was followed by breastfeeding within 1 h among women in public facilities (22 pp. between frontier governorates and urban governorates).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Percentage of women delivering in facilities reporting receiving each component of immediate postpartum care, and all components, by region

Full size image

Discussion

Between 1991 and 1995 and 2010–2014, the percentage of women delivering in a health facility increased at the national level and in all regions. During this period, the private sector became the predominant provider of childbirth care, and the public sector declined in absolute terms. The private sector increase was observed across all regions and wealth groups. The private sector now assists more than half of the births in the country, ranging from 47% in Frontier governorates to 72% in urban Lower Egypt. The rise in the use of private facilities began among wealthier women first, followed by poorer women starting to use private providers between 2004 and 2008 and 2010–2014. On the other hand, in 2010–2014, 13% of women in need of childbirth care did not give birth in a facility and 8% were not attended by a SBA.

The main finding of this study is that, despite the large proportion of women delivering in health facilities, almost none received all four basic components of immediate postpartum care captured on the 2014 DHS. This was largely driven by three components: a very low percentage of women reporting a minimum acceptable length of stay, initiating breastfeeding within an hour of birth, and having their newborn weighed. The low provision of these care components used as proxies for quality of care likely shows a major quality gap that was present in both public and private sectors.

We identified an important proportion of women who did not access a facility birth or receive SBA-attended home-based childbirth care. Studies [25,26,27] in Egypt have highlighted that, in some regions, women living might still have difficulties accessing services. For instance due to long distances and the lack of night-time or alternative emergency services at the limits of public facilities’ catchment areas [25]. In Upper Egypt, some women reported distance, transportation and services’ costs as barriers to access antenatal and medical treatment services [26]. In the 2004–2008 DHS recall period, 63% of women delivering at home reported that giving birth in a facility was not necessary, while 23% highlighted concerns with the price of care [27]. Although free childbirth care should be available in public facilities in Egypt for those unable to pay for it, it has been observed that this policy failed to reach the poorest women, who end up delivering at home and do not necessarily benefit from these entitlements [17]. While public health insurance covers facility deliveries, poorer, less educated and rural women were less likely to be covered by health insurance [28].

Egypt is one of the LMICs with the highest share of women receiving childbirth care from private providers globally [24] and both socio-cultural and economic capital are strong determinants of facility-based childbirth care in Egypt [17]. However, we observed in our study that not only wealthy households but also the poorest have turned to private providers for childbirth care, particularly in the most recent period examined. The contribution of these services to families’ out-of-pocket health expenses is likely to be significant; the mean price of a birth (either vaginal or C-section) as measured on the 2008 DHS was four times higher in private compared to public facilities [17]. Given the substantial financial burden of such expenditure on families, the impact of the increase in private care utilisation among women from poorer households requires further research. Furthermore, the role of private providers potentially promoting unnecessary medical care must be assessed. Egypt is now one of the countries with the highest percentage of births by C-section [29]. The C-section rate has increased consistently and is likely influenced by the use of private care [30, 31].

The significant turn to private childbirth care despite its high price raises questions on Egyptians’ perceptions of public services compared to private providers. Physicians commonly work simultaneously in both public and private sectors (i.e., dual practice), and they may refer public patients to their private practice for certain services. A survey of physicians showed that 89% had more than one job, and 16% had three or more [32]. Furthermore, although private services are not necessarily more effective or efficient than public ones, they may provide more timely and hospitable services [33]. In parts of Lower and Upper Egypt, qualitative research identified significant deficiencies in the care received by women in public health services during pregnancy and childbirth. These included lack of explanations to patients, not obtaining consent for treatment, and not respecting their right to privacy and confidentiality. Further, some women complained of disrespectful care, which might be linked to lack of adequate training in doctor-patient communication and doctor’s limited time with patients [25]. This evidence, along with reports of high caseloads influencing doctors’ management of labour [34, 35] and deficits in staffing, distribution of workforce in rural public facilities [36] can be particularly relevant to understanding the shift to private care. In a nationally-representative survey, the three reasons most commonly cited as primary contributors to satisfaction across different services were perceived quality, good communication skills, and reasonable financial and physical access [37]. Egyptian women expect to deliver in a caring and respectful environment, conditions that may often clash with their experiences with health providers [38]. Therefore, poor patient-centred care may be a key factor behind women preferring private facilities to public ones. Indeed, our results showing that essential components of immediate postpartum care are as low in the private sector as in the public sector imply that the preferences for private care might be based on trust, communication, and respect rather than evidence-based care.

Despite the high percentage of women delivering in health facilities and with a SBA, it is unlikely that similar numbers are receiving this childbirth care with adequate quality. Our analysis of the components of immediate postpartum care revealed the limitation of relying on coverage indicators of facility and SBA-attended deliveries as proxies for the percentage of women receiving good quality care or evidence-based content of childbirth care. This finding is aligned with existing evidence and highlights the need to increase the focus on quality measures [3,4,5,6, 39]. In Egypt, the substandard provision of immediate postpartum care documented by our analysis concurs with previous evidence [34, 35, 40, 41] and raises questions about the quality of childbirth care provided in both public and private sector facilities. This is well-illustrated by the alarmingly low percentage of women staying for an acceptable amount of time after birth. Egypt is one of the LMICs with the shortest length of stay for both vaginal and C-section deliveries, and the shortest length of stay for singleton vaginal deliveries – only half a day [42]. Early discharge can have negative effects on both women and newborns. For instance, it was linked to higher neonatal readmission in an Egyptian hospital [43]. The short periods of stay after birth are of special concern considering the increase in the percentage of C-sections in Egypt—54% of all births in 2010–2014. For public services, previous research suggests that high caseloads may be causing bed shortages [35], which in some areas may be exacerbated by understaffing in facilities [36]. Previous research on C-sections in public hospitals suggests that unnecessary C-sections are driven by a combination of lack of training and supervision and doctors convenience incentives (i.e. doctors choosing the shortest delivery option, in which timing can also be decided) [44]. It is possible that these factors also influence the provision of postpartum care and is unclear whether they may influence private provision too. For private services, the percentage of women reporting an acceptable length of stay was consistently lower compared to public services for wealthier and poorer households, urban and rural, and vaginal and C-section deliveries. The reasons behind this inadequate care in private facilities must be identified and addressed by policymakers. For example, it would be important to understand what proportions of women reporting to have delivered with a private doctor (tabib khas) delivered in public facilities under the fondoqy scheme versus in private clinics. Second, the physical structure of private clinics needs to be explored further, including whether possibilities for a sufficient lentgh of postpartum stay exist (inpatient beds, overnight staffing and adequate nursing care, etc.).

The proportion of women reporting breastfeeding their baby within the first hour was remarkably low, despite evidence suggesting better breastfeeding outcomes may be more favourable in facility births compared to births at home [45]. Delivery by C-section has been observed to delay breastfeeding initiation in different settings [46,47,48,49]. In a recent report, UNICEF and WHO observed that early initiation rates were significantly lower in newborns delivered by C-section compared to vaginal delivery in 45 out of 51 LMICs studied, including Egypt [49]. Considering the large percentage of births by C-section in Egypt [30], it is particularly relevant that guidelines and interventions are targeted to improve early breastfeeding initiation after this type of delivery. One such intervention may be to introduce skin-to-skin contact after C-sections [50]. In addition, trained staff who are knowledgeable enough to facilitate skin-to-skin and inform and support mothers in the breastfeeding process, along with monitoring systems tracking improvement, can help support early initiation [49]. A small cross-sectional study with nursing students in Cairo observed weak breastfeeding knowledge [51], while previous evidence in the country suggests that training primary care providers to promote and support breastfeeding can improve the adequacy of postnatal counselling [52]. In our study, early breastfeeding was also more common in Frontier governorates and Upper Egypt and particularly low in Urban Governorates. These differences may be influenced by differences in the percentage of C-sections [22, 53], but also by the knowledge and preferences of mothers, providers and communities and existing initiatives supporting breastfeeding [53]. Some evidence has pointed to rural mothers being aware of the benefits of breastfeeding [54], and mothers in Lower Egypt delaying breastfeeding initiation to an hour after delivery more often than in Upper Egypt [55]. Future research should focus on analysing the effect of increased C-sections on breastfeeding and understand other barriers or enablers of early initiation of breastfeeding in Egypt.

In contrast to length of stay and breastfeeding initiation, most women delivering in a facility reported being checked while still in the facility before discharge. However, the DHS only asks women if someone either inquired about their health or examined them. This means that many of these women may have never received a physical or complete examination. Further research would be needed to understand to assess whether the percentage of women who actually received a physical examination according to guidelines before discharge really approximates what is reported. Similarly, the percentage of women reporting their baby weight measured was higher than length of stay and breastfeeding initiation. However, 30 to 40% of women still did not receive a fairly simple procedure, despite the importance of low birth weight as a known risk factor [56, 57]. The causes for providers not measuring birth weight routinely, specially in rural and poorer households, should be further explored.

When considering why components of immediate postpartum care were provided differently across sectors, it is important to bear in mind that different levels of enforcement, incentives and resources play a role. For instance, it has been highlighted that private neonatal clinics are hardly supervised or monitored by the MOHP [58]. Given that private providers attend most deliveries, it is critical that better regulation and monitoring are put in place. In public services, lack of adherence to guidelines, training, supportive supervision and coordinated referral systems have been documented, leaving health workers unsupported and unprepared to perform their jobs correctly [44, 59]. It is currently unclear whether private providers may experience these issues too; greater access to information from private facilities should be required for policy and research purposes. In addition, health workers’ move to the private sector for better salaries [36, 58, 60], leaving public facilities with less experienced staff and, sometimes, understaffed [36]. Urgent action is required to understand and address the drivers of poor quality in all its forms, including insufficient resources in the health system, poor compliance, perverse incentives, enforcement of existing standards, and providers’ behaviours moving between the private and public sector.

Immediate steps can be made towards improving the quality of childbirth care. For instance, midwives can have a greater role during and right after delivery, providing services (early breastfeeding, pre-discharge checks) that doctors may not have time for, and supporting women during delivery [30]. This task-shifting is likely to provide better patient-centred care to women and help with understaffing. Educational interventions targeting health providers and poor women in childbearing period could be an effective approach to make women more aware of the care they should be provided [61]. To better inform policymaking on a timely basis, routine data collection systems need to be developed to capture quality of care in key moments before, during and after childbirth. New specialised tools are being developed to understand how mothers are treated during childbirth and could be used to track the care mothers receive [62]. Moreover, further resources and attention need to be placed in developing systems that collect, harmonize and make health system data from both public and private providers accessible to policymakers and researchers [4].

Limitations

This study benefited from comparable data collected in Egypt over a period of 23 years. The limitations of this study include the fact that surveys only captured live births, thus information about women experiencing negative outcomes (e.g., stillbirths, miscarriage, maternal death) is not reflected in this sample. In addition, some women have to recall care received up to 5 years ago and during which they may have received anaesthesia. These aspects may might also have affected the ability of some women to remember whether or how they received a specific intervention. We analysed care for most recent live births, and thus slightly underestimated the experiences of women who had more than one live birth in the recall period. Moreover, DHS surveys are cross-sectional and conducted every four to 5 years, making impossible to follow respondents over time.

Household surveys such as DHS and Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS) do not capture receipt of key intrapartum care interventions such as use of uterotonics or monitoring of progress of labour [63]. Our ability to describe the content of childbirth was limited to the proxy components capturing only some aspects of clinical and process quality. As a result, important aspects such as interventions provided during delivery, the patient-provider interaction and respectful care could not be explored. However, the available four elements can likely provide important signals about the quality of intrapartum care and certainly reveal significant gaps in immediate postpartum care offered across the different categories of delivery systems. Given the systemic issues influencing quality of care in Egypt [58] and documented substandard intrapartum practices [34, 35], tools that can capture better measures of quality of care during and after delivery should be developed. However, such data and indicators are unlikely to be collected from women themselves, due to poor validity [64,65,66,67]. Finally, it was not possible to assess whether women in public hospitals were in a public or a paying/private section. The private sector includes a range of providers with different service quality and capacity to provide services adequately. Due to the nature of the questions in the survey, our analysis was not capable of differentiating between these providers to assess if critical differences exist between them. These challenges within DHS have been voiced elsewhere [68] and should considered in the design of future surveys looking into maternal health services.

Conclusion

Between 1991 and 2014, Egypt experienced remarkable improvements in the percentage of women delivering in a facility and with an SBA across all regions and wealth groups. Crucially, during this period, the private sector became the main provider of childbirth care in the country. Studying the reasons behind this shift to private childbirth care can provide valuable information on dimensions of quality that may need improvement in public facilities, such as trust, communication and respect.

Despite the large percentage of women delivering in facilities, almost none of them reported received all the basic components of immediate postpartum care captured on the 2014 DHS, regardless of sector. This evidence suggests that most providers failed to provide childbirth care according to Egyptian or international guidelines. A combination of different factors is likely to influence substandard care, including insufficient staff, resources and training, lack of adherence to guidelines, inadequate supervision, and suboptimal incentives for provision of high-quality care. These factors need to be studied further to be addressed adequately. Researchers and policymakers must prioritize understanding the determinants of substandard childbirth care and developing policies and allocating resources to address them. Until these steps are taken, Egypt is likely to miss many of the benefits that their high levels of coverage of facility deliveries would be expected to confer on maternal and neonatal health.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available in the Demographic and Health surveys repository, available at: https://dhsprogram.com/data/Using-Datasets-for-Analysis.cfm.

Abbreviations

C-section:

Caesarean section

DHS:

Demographic and Health Survey

HDX:

Humanitarian Data Exchange

HIO:

Health insurance organization

LMICs:

Low- and Middle-income countries

MICS:

Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys

MOHP:

Ministry of Health and Population

NGOs:

Non-governmental organizations

RLE:

Rural Lower Egypt

RUE:

Rural Upper Egypt

SBA:

Skilled birth attendant

ULE:

Urban Lower Egypt

UNICEF:

United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund

UUE:

Urban Upper Egypt

WHO:

World Health Organization

References

  1. World Health Organization, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group, United Nations. Trends in Maternal Mortality: 1990 to 2015: estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division. 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Campbell OM, Graham WJ. Strategies for reducing maternal mortality: getting on with what works. lancet. 2006;368:1284–99 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17027735. [cited 2018 Aug 26].

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Campbell OMR, Calvert C, Testa A, Strehlow M, Benova L, Keyes E, et al. The scale, scope, coverage, and capability of childbirth care. The Lancet. 2016;388:2193–208 Available from: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(16)31528-8/fulltext. [cited 2019 Jun 18].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kruk ME, Gage AD, Arsenault C, Jordan K, Leslie HH, Roder-DeWan S, et al. High-quality health systems in the Sustainable Development Goals era: time for a revolution. Lancet Glob Heal. 2018;6(11):e1196–252 Available from: www.thelancet.com/lancetgh. [cited 2019 Jun 18].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fink G, Cohen J. Delivering quality: safe childbirth requires more than facilities. Lancet Glob Heal. 2019;7(8):e990–1 Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214109X19301937. [cited 2019 Aug 1].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gabrysch S, Nesbitt R, Schoeps A, Hurt L, Soremekun S, Edmond K, et al. Does facility birth reduce maternal and perinatal mortality?: A secondary analysis of two RCTs including 119,244 pregnancies in Brong Ahafo, Ghana. Lancet Glob Heal. 2019;7(8):e1074–87 Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214109X19301652. [cited 2019 Aug 1].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. The World Bank Group. Population estimates and projections | DataBank. 2019; Available from: https://databank.worldbank.org/reports.aspx?source=Health-Nutrition-and-Population-Statistics:-Population-estimates-and-projections. [cited 2019 Jun 18]

    Google Scholar 

  8. Radovich E, El-Shitany A, Sholkamy H, Benova L. Rising up: Fertility trends in Egypt before and after the revolution. PLoS One [Internet]. 2018 ;13(1). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190148. [cited 2019 Jun 18]

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. UNFPA. Trends of Fertility Levels in Egypt in Recent Years [Internet]. 2019. Available from: https://egypt.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/pub-pdf/Trends of Fertility Levels Final Version 12Sept2019.pdf.

  10. UNFPA. Population Situation Analysis of Egypt [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2018 Sep 3]. Available from: https://egypt.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/pub-pdf/Population Situation Analysis WEB May23rd.pdf.

  11. Campbell O, Gipson R, Issa AH, Matta N, El Deeb B, El Mohandes A, et al. National maternal mortality ratio in Egypt halved between 1992–93 and 2000. Bull World Health Organ. 2005;83(6):462–71 Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2626255/pdf/15976898.pdf. [cited 2017 Dec 15].

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group, United Nations Population Division. Trends in Maternal Mortality : 2000 To 2017 [Internet]. WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division. 2019. Available from: https://www.unfpa.org/featured-publication/trends-maternal-mortality-2000-2017

    Google Scholar 

  13. Neonatal mortality - UNICEF DATA. 2019 . Available from: https://data.unicef.org/topic/child-survival/neonatal-mortality/. [cited 2019 Nov 17]

  14. Campbell O, Foster Mustarde L, Hassanein N, Khalil K. How Egypt has overcome the challenges. In: Kehoe S, Neilson J, Norman J, editors. Maternal and infant deaths: chasing millennium development goals 4 and 5. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010. Available from: http://researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/id/eprint/1910.

    Google Scholar 

  15. World Health Organization. Country Cooperation Strategy for WHO and Egypt. 2010. Available from: http://applications.emro.who.int/docs/CCS_Egypt_2010_EN_14481.pdf. [cited 2017 Dec 15]

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gipson R, El Mohandes A, Campbell O, Issa AH, Matta N, Mansour E. The trend of maternal mortality in Egypt from 1992–2000: An emphasis on regional differences. Matern Child Health J. 2005;9(1):71–82 Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10995-005-3348-1. [cited 2018 Aug 26].

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Benova L, Campbell OM, Ploubidis GB. A mediation approach to understanding socio-economic inequalities in maternal health-seeking behaviours in Egypt. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15(1):1 Available from: http://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12913-014-0652-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. World Health Organization. EMRO Health System Profile: Egypt. 2006. Available from: http://apps.who.int/medicinedocs/documents/s17293e/s17293e.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  19. USAID, El-Zanaty Associates, Ministry of Health and Population. Egypt Service Provision Assessment Survey 2004. 2005. Available from: www.measuredhs.com. [cited 2018 Aug 26]

    Google Scholar 

  20. World Health Organization. World Health Statistics: monitoring health for the sustainable development goals. Geneva: World Health Statistics: monitoring health for the SDGs, sustainable development goals; 2018. Available from: https://www.who.int/gho/publications/world_health_statistics/2019/en/

    Google Scholar 

  21. The World Bank Group. Out-of-pocket expenditure (% of current health expenditure) | Data. 2019. Available from: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.XPD.OOPC.CH.ZS?locations=EG. [cited 2019 Jun 18]

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ministry of Health and Population of Egypt, El-Zanaty and Associates, ICF International. Egypt Demographic and Health Survey 2014. 2015. Available from: https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR302/FR302.pdf. [cited 2018 Dec 3]

    Google Scholar 

  23. Humanitarian Data Exchange (HDX). Available from: https://data.humdata.org/dataset/egypt-administrative-boundaries-levels-0-3

  24. Campbell OMR, Benova L, Macleod D, Baggaley RF, Rodrigues LC, Hanson K, et al. Family planning, antenatal and delivery care: cross-sectional survey evidence on levels of coverage and inequalities by public and private sector in 57 low- and middle-income countries. Trop med Int heal. 2016;21(4):486–503 Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26892335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. UNICEF, Egybiotech. Gender analysis for factors affecting use and provision of health services in areas of the integrated perinatal health and child nutrition Programme [Internet]. 2015. Available from: https://www.unicef.org/egypt/research-and-reports

    Google Scholar 

  26. Chiang C, Labeeb SA, Higuchi M, Mohamed AG, Aoyama A. Barriers to the use of basic health services among women in rural southern Egypt (Upper Egypt). Nagoya J Med Sci. 2013;75(3–4):225–31 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24640178. [cited 2017 Dec 8].

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. El-Zanaty F, Way A. Egypt Demographic and Health Survey 2008. 2009. Available from: http://www.measuredhs.com/pubs/pdf/FR220/FR220.pdf. [cited 2019 Aug 3]

  28. Rashad AS, Sharaf MF, Mansour EI. Does public health insurance increase maternal health care utilization in Egypt?. 2016. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jid.3414. [cited 2019 Aug 5]

    Google Scholar 

  29. Boerma T, Ronsmans C, Melesse DY, Barros AJD, Barros FC, Juan L, et al. Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections. Lancet. 2018;392(10155):1341–8 Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140673618319287?via%3Dihub. [cited 2018 Dec 3].

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Abdel-Tawab N, Oraby D, Hassanein N, El-Nakib S. Cesarean section deliveries in Egypt: trends, practices, perceptions, and cost. 2018; Available from: https://www.popcouncil.org/uploads/pdfs/2018PGY_CesareanSectionEgypt.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  31. Al Rifai RH. Trend of caesarean deliveries in Egypt and its associated factors: Evidence from national surveys, 2005-2014. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):417 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29237410. [cited 2018 Sep 3].

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. DFID Health systems resource Centre. Multiple public-private jobholding of health care providers in developing countries 2004; Available from: http://www.heart-resources.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Multiple-public-private-jobholding-of-healthcare-providers.pdf

  33. Basu S, Andrews J, Kishore S, Panjabi R, Stuckler D. Comparative performance of private and public healthcare systems in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review. PLoS Med. 2012;9(6):19 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22723748. [cited 2019 Aug 5].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Cherine M, Khalil K, Hassanein N, Sholkamy H, Breebaart M, Elnoury A. Management of the third stage of labor in an Egyptian teaching hospital. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2004;87(1):54–8 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15464784. [cited 2018 Aug 26].

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Khalil K, Cherine M, Elnoury A, Sholkamy H, Breebaart M, Hassanein N. Labor augmentation in an Egyptian teaching hospital. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2004;85(1):74–80 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15050479. [cited 2019 Aug 1].

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. UNICEF, Egybiotech. Qualitative study on barriers and bottlenecks to effective perinatal care in rural Egypt. 2013. Available from: https://www.unicef.org/egypt/research-and-reports

    Google Scholar 

  37. Rafeh N, Williams J, Hassan N. Egypt Household Health Expenditure and Utilization survey 2010. 2011. Available from: https://www.hfgproject.org/egypt-household-health-expenditure-utilization-survey-2010/

    Google Scholar 

  38. El-Nemer A, Downe S, Small N. ‘She would help me from the heart’: An ethnography of Egyptian women in labour. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62(1):81–92 Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S027795360500242X. [cited 2019 Oct 12].

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Radovich E, Benova L, Penn-Kekana L, Wong K, OMR C. Who assisted with the delivery of (NAME)?’ Issues in estimating skilled birth attendant coverage through population-based surveys and implications for improving global tracking. BMJ Glob Heal. 2019;4(2):e001367 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31139455. [cited 2019 Aug 5].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Khalil K, Elnoury A, Cherine M, Sholkamy H, Hassanein N, Mohsen L, et al. Hospital practice versus evidence-based obstetrics: categorizing practices for normal birth in an Egyptian teaching hospital. Birth. 2005;32(4):283–90 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16336369. [cited 2019 Aug 5].

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Miller S, Abalos E, Chamillard M, Ciapponi A, Colaci D, Comandé D, et al. Beyond too little, too late and too much, too soon: a pathway towards evidence-based, respectful maternity care worldwide. The Lancet. 2016;388:2176–92 Available from: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-67361631472-6/fulltext. [cited 2019 Aug 5].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Campbell OMR, Cegolon L, Macleod D, Benova L. Length of stay after childbirth in 92 countries and associated factors in 30 low- and middle-income countries: compilation of reported data and a cross-sectional analysis from nationally representative surveys. PLoS Med. 2016;13(3):1–24 Available from: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1001972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Bayoumi YA, Bassiouny YA, Hassan AA, Gouda M, Sameh S, Abdelrahman Z, et al. Is there a difference in the maternal and neonatal outcomes between patients discharged after 24 h versus 72 h following cesarean section? A prospective randomized observational study on 2998 patients. J Matern Neonatal Med. 2017;29(8):1339–43 Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=ijmf20. [cited 2018 Sep 5].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Elnakib S, Abdel-Tawab N, Orbay D, Hassanein N. Medical and non-medical reasons for cesarean section delivery in Egypt: a hospital-based retrospective study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):1–11 Available from: https://bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12884-019-2558-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Oakley L, Benova L, Macleod D, Lynch CA, OMR C. Early breastfeeding practices: Descriptive analysis of recent Demographic and Health Surveys. Matern Child Nutr. 2018;14(2):e12535 Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/mcn.12535. [cited 2019 Aug 2].

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Zanardo V, Svegliado G, Cavallin F, Giustardi A, Cosmi E, Litta P, et al. Elective Cesarean Delivery: Does It Have a Negative Effect on Breastfeeding? Birth. 2010;37(4):275–9 Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1523-536X.2010.00421.x. [cited 2019 Aug 2].

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Takahashi K, Ganchimeg T, Ota E, Vogel JP, Souza JP, Laopaiboon M, et al. Prevalence of early initiation of breastfeeding and determinants of delayed initiation of breastfeeding: secondary analysis of the WHO global survey. Vol. 7, scientific reports: Nature publishing group; 2017. p. 44868. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28322265. [cited 2019 Aug 2]

  48. Dewey KG, Nommsen-Rivers LA, Heinig MJ, Cohen RJ. Risk Factors for Suboptimal Infant Breastfeeding Behavior, Delayed Onset of Lactation, and Excess Neonatal Weight Loss. Pediatrics. 2003;112(3):607–19 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12949292. [cited 2019 Aug 2].

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. UNICEF, WHO. Capture the Moment – Early initiation of breastfeeding: The best start for every newborn: Unicef; 2018. p. 1–42. Available from: https://data.unicef.org/topic/nutrition/infant-and-young-child-feeding/. [cited 2019 Aug 2]

  50. Stevens J, Schmied V, Burns E, Dahlen H. Immediate or early skin-to-skin contact after a Caesarean section: A review of the literature. Matern Child Nutr. 2014;10:456–73 Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/mcn.12128?casa_token=GBk0ANuDa1EAAAAA:g511eqtiLWrGcP76mX1fVk5lFzeyvaAhnXIU4Ey7CcZc8QvQV3p6d1Pa6nzkGzU_0oAYEzYfgZzcxg. [cited 2019 Aug 2].

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Ahmed A, El Guindy SR. Breastfeeding knowledge and attitudes among Egyptian baccalaureate students. Int Nurs Rev. 2011;58(3):372–8 Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1466-7657.2011.00885.x. [cited 2018 Sep 5].

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Abul-Fadl PAM, Mohamed PEAB, Abu PO, Shady BDOG, DMM F, et al. How Much Training Can Change Antenatal Care Practices in Counseling and Breatfeeding Promotion? MCFC-Egyptian. J Breastfeed. 2016;12:43–56 Available from: http://www.mcfcare.org/Journal/Volume/Vol_12.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Prior E, Santhakumaran S, Gale C, Philipps LH, Modi N, Hyde MJ. Breastfeeding after cesarean delivery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of world literature. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012;95(5):1113–35 Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22456657. [cited 2019 Dec 23].

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Mohammed E, Ghazawy E, Hassan E. Knowledge, attitude, and practices of breastfeeding and weaning among mothers of children up to 2 years old in a rural area in el-minia governorate, Egypt. J Fam Med Prim Care. 2014;3(2):–136 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25161971. [cited 2018 Sep 5].

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Abul-Fadl AMAM, Shawky M, El-Taweel A, Cadwell K, Turner-Maffei C. Evaluation of Mothers’ Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice Towards the Ten Steps to Successful Breastfeeding in Egypt. Breastfeed Med. 2012;7(3):173–8 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22803928. [cited 2018 Sep 5].

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Hong R, Ruiz-Beltran M. Low birth weight as a risk factor for infant mortality in Egypt. East Mediterr Heal J. 2008;14(5):992–1002 Available from: http://www.emro.who.int/emhj-volume-14-2008/volume-14-issue-5/low-birth-weight-as-a-risk-factor-for-infant-mortality-in-egypt.html.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Mansour E, Eissa AN, Nofal LM, Kharboush I, Reda AA. Morbidity and mortality of low-birth- weight infants in Egypt. 2005;11(4):723–31 Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16700389.

  58. UNICEF, Centre for Development Services. Barriers to effective neonatal referral system and quality service delivery in Egypt. 2015. Available from: https://www.unicef.org/egypt/research-and-reports

    Google Scholar 

  59. UNICEF. Reaching Universal Health Coverage through District Health System Strengthening: Using a modified Tanahashi model sub-nationally to attain equitable and effective coverage [Internet]. Maternal, Newborn and Child Health Working Paper, UNICEF Health Section. 2013 [cited 2017 Dec 8]. Available from: https://www.unicef.org/health/files/DHSS_to_reach_UHC_121013.pdf

  60. World Bank. Intensive learning implementation completion and results report. 2010. Available from: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/713771468236044169/pdf/ICR11620ICR0P01closed0april03002010.pdf. [cited 2018 Sep 3]

    Google Scholar 

  61. Metwally AM, Saleh RM, El-Etreby LA, Salama SI, Aboulghate A, Amer HA, et al. Enhancing the value of women’s reproductive rights through community based interventions in upper Egypt governorates: a randomized interventional study. Int J equity health. 2019;18(1):1–10 Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31533741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Bohren M. development of tools to measure how women are treated during facility-based childbirth in four countries: L observation and community survey 11 M and HS 1117 PH and HSA, Vogel JP, Fawole B, Maya ET, Maung TM, Baldé MD, et al. Methodological development of tools to measure how women are treated during facility-based childbirth in four countries: Labor observation and community survey 11 Medical and Health Sciences 1117 Public Health and Health Services. BMC Med Res Methodol, 15. 2018;18(1):1 Available from: https://bmcmedresmethodol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12874-018-0603-x.

  63. Bryce J, Arnold F, Blanc A, Hancioglu A, Newby H, Requejo J, et al. Measuring Coverage in MNCH: New Findings, New Strategies, and Recommendations for Action. PLoS Med. 2013;10(5) Available from: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1001423.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Stanton CK, Rawlins B, Drake M, Dos Anjos M, Cantor D, Chongo L, et al. Measuring coverage in MNCH: testing the validity of women’s self-report of key maternal and newborn health interventions during the peripartum period in Mozambique. PLoS One. 2013;8(5):e60694 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23667427. [cited 2017 Dec 15].

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Blanc AK, Diaz C, Mccarthy KJ, Berdichevsky K. Measuring progress in maternal and newborn health care in Mexico : validating indicators of health system contact and quality of care. BMC pregnancy childbirth. 2016:1–11. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27577266.

  66. Blanc AK, Warren C, McCarthy KJ, Kimani J, Ndwiga C, RamaRao S. Assessing the validity of indicators of the quality of maternal and newborn health care in Kenya. J glob health. 2016;6(1):1–13 Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27231541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. McCarthy KJ, Blanc AK, Warren CE, Mdawida B. Women’s recall of maternal and newborn interventions received in the postnatal period: a validity study in Kenya and Swaziland. J glob health. 2018;8(1) Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29904605.

  68. Footman K, Benova L, Goodman C, Macleod D, Lynch CA, Penn-Kekana L, et al. Using multi-country household surveys to understand who provides reproductive and maternal health services in low- and middle-income countries: A critical appraisal of the Demographic and Health Surveys. Trop Med Int Heal. 2015;20(5):589–606 Available from: http://userforum.dhsprogram.com/. [cited 2019 Feb 10].

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Filmer D, Pritchett LH. Estimating wealth effects without expenditure data - Or tears: An application to educational enrollments in states of India. Demography. 2001;38(1):115–32 Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3088292?origin=crossref. [cited 2018 Sep 3].

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Rutstein SO, Johnson K. The DHS Wealth Index. DHS Comp Reports No 6. 2004;6:1–71 Available from: https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/CR6/CR6.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful for Demographic and Health Surveys for putting these data in the service of science and for the women participating in these surveys. The authors would also like to express their gratitude to Dr. Nahla Abdel-Tawab from Population Council Egypt for providing key insights for the discussion and recommendations. The author would also like to thank Dr. Kerry Wong from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine for her support creating the map of Egyptian governorates.

Funding

Some of the authors (LB, ER, MP) of this paper were partly supported by funding from MSD (Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp) through its MSD for Mothers program. MSD had no role in the design, collection, analysis and interpretation of data, in writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. The content of this publication is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not represent the official views of MSD. MSD for Mothers is an initiative of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, N.J., U.S.A.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Public Health and Policy, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, UK

    Miguel Pugliese-Garcia

  2. Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK

    Emma Radovich, Oona M. R. Campbell & Lenka Benova

  3. Gynuity Health Projects, Egypt team, 220 East 42nd, New York, NY, 10017, USA

    Nevine Hassanein

  4. Oxford Policy Management, New Delhi, India

    Karima Khalil

  5. Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium

    Lenka Benova

Authors
  1. Miguel Pugliese-Garcia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Emma Radovich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Oona M. R. Campbell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nevine Hassanein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Karima Khalil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Lenka Benova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MPG, LB, OMRC and ER conceptualised the study. LB and ER standardised the datasets. MPG led the analysis of the data with inputs from LB, ER, OMRC, NH and KK. MPG and LB wrote the first draft of the manuscript, which was revised, finalised and approved by ER, OMRC, NH, and KK. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miguel Pugliese-Garcia.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The DHS receive government permission and follow ethical practices including informed consent and assurance of confidentiality. Before interviews started, respondents were informed about the purpose and duration of the interviews. They were given the name of the agency that was conducting the survey and informed that their participation was voluntary, and that they could stop the interview at any time. Respondents were told that all information provided would be kept confidential and de-identified to protect their anonymity. They were given an opportunity to ask the survey enumerator any questions. The enumerator asked them whether they consented to participate. Such verbal consent, if obtained, was noted on the questionnaire with a signature of the enumerator and the date before the start of the interview. Egypt’s Institutional Review Board ensured that the survey complied with national laws and norms. The Research Ethics Committee of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine approved our secondary-data analysis.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1.

Indicators and definitions used [24, 42, 64,65,66,67, 69, 70].

Additional file 2.

Characteristics of the study population.

Additional file 3.

Percentages, 95% confidence intervals and p-values of the data used in Figs. 2, 3 and 4.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pugliese-Garcia, M., Radovich, E., Campbell, O.M.R. et al. Childbirth care in Egypt: a repeat cross-sectional analysis using Demographic and Health Surveys between 1995 and 2014 examining use of care, provider mix and immediate postpartum care content. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 20, 46 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-2730-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-2730-8

Keywords

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

ISSN: 1471-2393

Contact us