Skip to main content
Download PDF

Absence of lymphatic vessels in term placenta

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth volume 20, Article number: 380 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

There has been debate about the existence of lymphatic vessels in placenta. Lymphatic endothelial cell (LEC) markers such as LYVE-1 and podoplanin/D2–40 have been found, although PROX1 has not been detected. The most reliable marker for LECs is the double staining for CD31 and PROX1, which has not been performed yet.

Methods

We studied three term placentas and dissected them into three areas: i.) basal plate area, ii.) intermediate area, and iii.) chorionic plate area. We used immunofluorescence single and double staining with antibodies against CD31, PROX1, LYVE-1, VEGFR-3, D2–40/PDPN, CD34, CCBE-1, and vimentin, as well as nested PCR, qPCR, Western blot and transmission electron microscopy (TEM).

Results

At TEM level we observed structures that have previously mistakenly been interpreted as lymphatics, however, we did not find any CD31/PROX1 double-positive cells in placenta. Absence of PROX1 was also noted by nested PCR, qPCR and Western blot. Also, LEC marker VEGFR-3 was expressed only in a small number of scattered leukocytes but was absent from vessels. The LEC marker D2–40/PDPN was expressed in most stromal cells, and the LEC marker LYVE-1 was found in a considerable number of stromal cells, but not in endothelial cells, which were positive for CD31, CD34, CCBE-1 and vimentin. Additionally, vimentin was found in stromal cells.

Conclusions

Our studies clearly show absence of lymphatics in term placenta. We also show that the functional area of the mother’s endometrium is not penetrated by lymphatics in term pregnancy.

Peer Review reports

Background

Placenta and umbilical cord have been studied extensively during the last decades [1,2,3,4], and it is well accepted that the umbilical cord at term contains two arteries and one vein. Knowledge about the umbilical vasculature goes back, at least, to Andreas Vesalius (1514–1564) (for literature see: [5]). Lymphatics have never been found in the umbilical cord. However, the existence of lymphatics in placenta cannot be completely excluded, since not all lymphatics finally reach the jugulo-subclavian angle of the venous system. In the eye, Schlemm’s canal, a lymphatic-like vessel, drains into the vortex veins [6]. The heart, too, contains organ-specific lymphatics, which enter a vein at the base of the organ proper [7]. It could therefore not be excluded that the placenta may contain lymphatics, which do not pass through the umbilical cord, but might directly enter placental veins. In fact, at TEM level, there were descriptions of lymphatics in placental villi [8].

The most reliable marker for staining of lymphatic vessels in human tissues is the double-staining with antibodies against the cell adhesion molecule CD31/PECAM-1 and the transcription factor PROX1 [9]. Thereby, CD31 is a pan-endothelial marker for both blood vessels and lymphatics, while PROX1 is found specifically in lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs) in addition to some non-endothelial cell types, which are CD31-negative [10, 11]. There are other highly specific LEC markers, which have frequently been used to identify lymphatics: such as the CD44 homolog LYVE-1 [12], the 43 kDa surface glycoprotein podoplanin (PDPN)/D2–40 [13], 1999), and the Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-3 (VEGFR-3 / FLT4) [14,15,16]. These markers have been used to study human placenta, and thereby, expression of LYVE1 [17] and PDPN/D2–40 has been found [18, 19]. Thereby, PDPN/D2–40 was observed in the placental stroma, and it was suggested that this may be indicative of a reticular-lymphatic-like conductive system. The expression of D2–40 in stromal cells was also found in another study [20]. These authors also noted absence of PROX1 in fetal placental vessels and, correspondingly, absence of lymphatics in placenta. The above cited studies used immunohistochemistry and peroxidase staining with just single primary antibodies. Here we applied double-immunofluorescence techniques, which is necessary to identify LECs with PROX1 and CD31 antibodies. Additionally, we used other recently described LEC markers such as vimentin and CCBE1 [21], and we performed qPCR and nested PCR as highly sensitive methods to study expression of PROX1.

Methods

Tissues and cells

Three term placentas (week 38, 40, 41) were collected with the informed, written consent of the mothers after normal vaginal births of healthy children, and dissected into three areas: i.) basal plate area, ii.) intermediate area, and iii.) chorionic plate area. Specimens of app. 1cm3 (and predominantly made up of villous tissue) were rinsed in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and freshly frozen for Western blot analysis and mRNA isolation for PCR, or fixed for histology and immunohistology as described below. Foreskin specimens from healthy boys were used as positive controls for PCR studies and immunohistology of lymphatic vessels as described [21]. The studies were performed with the informed and written consent of the donors or their legal representatives. Human lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs) were purchased from PromoCell (Heidelberg, Germany), cultured in LEC medium and checked for purity as described recently [22]. All studies on human tissues were approved by the ethics committee of the University Medical Hospital Göttingen, UMG (application no. 18/1/18).

Immunohistology

For immunofluorescence studies, specimens were fixed for 20–25 min in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA), rinsed in PBS, transferred into 10 and 30% sucrose in PBS, and embedded in tissue freeze medium (Tissue Tek, Sakura Finetek Zoeterwoude, NL). Sections of 12 – 14 μm were incubated with the following primary antibodies: Rabbit-anti-human CCBE1 (1:500, Sigma-Aldrich, München, Germany; #R38605), mouse-anti-human CD31 (1:50, BD Pharmingen; clone WM59), mouse-anti-human D2–40/podoplanin (1:200, Dako, Hamburg, Germany; #M3619), rabbit-anti-human LYVE-1 (1:500, ReliaTech, Wolfenbüttel, Germany; #102-PA50AG), rabbit-anti-human PROX1 (1:500, ReliaTech; #102-PA32AG), mouse-anti-human vimentin (1:200, Dako; #GA630), mouse-anti-human CD34 (1:200, Dako; clone QBEnd-10), mouse-anti-human VEGFR-3 (1:100, ReliaTech; #101-M36). Secondary antibodies were: goat-anti-mouse Alexa 488/594 (#A11001; #A21135), goat-anti-rabbit Alexa 594 (#A11012), donkey-anti-goat Alexa 488 (#A11055; MobiTech, Göttingen, Germany). Sections were counter-stained with Dapi and mounted under cover slips with Fluoromount-G (Southern Biotechnology, US). Photos were taken with AxioImagerZ1 (Zeiss, Göttingen, Germany).

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)

Specimens were fixed with original Karnovsky’s fixative over-night [23], washed in 0.15 M phosphate buffer for 10 min, transferred into osmium tetroxide solution and incubated for 2 h at 4 °C. Then the samples were rinsed with 0.15 M phosphate buffer for 10 min and subsequently dehydrated in an ascending series of ethanol. Samples were transferred into Epon embedding solution, cut with an Ultracut E microtome (Reichert-Jung) into 90 nm sections. Staining of sections was performed as described [21]. Specimens were analyzed with Leo 906E TEM (Zeiss, Germany).

Western blot

Cells and tissues were washed 3-times with DPBS (Pan Biotech; Aidenbach, Germany) and 1 mM sodium orthovanadate (Sigma-Aldrich; Steinheim, Germany), homogenized (tissues), and subsequently lysed with RIPA buffer for 10 min on ice. Samples were transferred to micro-tubes (Sarstedt; Nürnberg, Germany) and centrifuged by 20,800x g for 15 min. Protein lysates were collected and used for SDS-PAGE according to standard procedures. Proteins were transferred to PVDF membranes (Roth; Karlsruhe, Germany), which were then washed with TBST (0.1% Tween 20) for 10 min and blocked for 1 h in blocking buffer (5% BSA in TBST 0.1%). Primary anti-human antibodies were: Lyve1 (ReliaTech, Lot 1408R07), PROX1 (Reliatech Lot 0810R19–1), VEGFR-3/FLT4 (ReliaTech, Lot #9D9) and peroxidase-conjugated α-tubulin, 1:10000 (Abcam, ab40742). Incubation was at 4 °C overnight. After washing with TBST (0.1% Tween 20) for 10 min., the peroxidase-conjugated secondary anti-rabbit IgG, 1:2000 (Santa Cruz; USA) were incubated for 1 h. After washing, antigen-antibody complexes were visualized with ECL in Chemidoc Touch Imaging System (Bio-Rad, München, Germany).

Real-time RT-PCR

Real Time RT-PCR was performed as described [24]. Primers were:

PROX1_fwd: 5′-tgaatccccaaggttctgag-3′, Prox1_rev: 5′-agcagcttgcggagtacatt-3′, LYVE-1_fwd: 5′-gctttccatccaggtgtcat-3′, Lyve-1_rev: 5′-agcctacaggcctccttagc-3′, Podoplanin_fwd: 5′-gaagacatccccagtcctca-3′, Podoplanin_rev: 5′-ctggatggtgctgagacaga-3′. Relative expression was calculated in comparison to LEC expression levels by using the δδCT-Method [25]. Statistical analyses were conducted by two-way-ANOVA with STATISTICA software (Statsoft, Tulsa, Oklahoma). Normal distribution was verified before testing. The standard error of the mean (SEM) was calculated and is shown in the graphs.

Nested RT-PCR

Nested PCR was performed to increase specificity and reduce non-specific binding of primers, starting with 40 cycles with outer primers (out) followed by inner primers (in). Primers were:

Prox1_out_fwd: 5′-gtcatctcaccacctgagcc-3′; Prox1_out_rev: 5′-tggaacctcaaagtcatttgct-3′.

Prox1_in_fwd: 5′-gagtgcggcgatcttcaa-3′; Prox1_in_rev: 5′-ggtgacaatccttcctgcat-3′.

Results

Our TEM studies revealed typical characteristics of the term placenta with syncytiotrophoblast, sparse cytotrophoblast, fetal capillaries and stromal cells (Fig. 1), but also cells with huge vacuoles (asterisks in Fig. 1), which have been taken as a hint for the existence of lymphatics [8], but may be signs of disintegration of tissue after delivery of the placenta. There is no cell membrane lining the vacuoles, and there is no basal lamina, which would be characteristic of capillaries. Searching for lymphatics in the placenta we performed anti-CD31 and anti-PROX1 double-staining. In contrast to dermis, which contains a dense lymphatic network, we never observed lymphatics in the placenta (Fig. 2). The absence of PROX1 was confirmed by qPCR (Fig. 3), nested PCR (Fig. 4) and Western blot (Fig. 5). We compared three areas of the placenta (basal plate area, intermediate area, and chorionic plate area) with pure LECs, and with both LECs as well as foreskin tissue. As expected, LECs were clearly positive for PROX1, whereas no signal was found in placenta (Figs. 3, 4, 5). Also, with nested PCR the signal was highest in LECs and a lower signal was found in foreskin. Again, no signal was detectable in placenta from all three selected areas (Fig. 4). Absence of lymphatics in placenta was confirmed by anti-VEGFR-3 staining. We observed a signal in a very small number of scattered leukocytes, but not in endothelial cells (Fig. 6a-c). Accordingly, a signal for VEGFR-3 was not detectable in placenta with Western blot (Fig. 5). The LEC marker LYVE1 was found in scattered stromal cells of the placenta, and there was no colocalization with the endothelial marker CD34 (Fig. 6 d-f). LYVE1 was well detectable in placenta with qPCR and Western blot (Figs. 3, 5). The LEC marker D2–40/PDPN was detected in almost all stromal cells of the placenta, and again, there was no colocalization with the endothelially expressed CCBE1 (Fig. 6 g-i). With qPCR we found high levels of PDPN expression in placenta (Fig. 3). Vimentin, a typical mesenchymal marker was found in endothelial cells and stromal cells (Fig. 6 k-m). Our data reveal that none of the characteristic LEC markers (PROX1, VEGFR-3, LYVE1, and PDPN) is expressed in endothelial cells of the placenta; and PROX1, the probably most important marker, is completely absent from placenta.

Fig. 1
figure1

TEM studies of term placentas. a, b) The chorionic villi are typically made up of syncytiotrophoblast, some cytotrophoblast cells, blood capillaries and stromal cells. Asterisks mark huge vacuolated cells

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure2

Anti-CD31 (green) and anti-PROX1 (magenta) double-staining of delivered placenta (A-C) and fore-skin (D). a CD31 marks all blood vessels in the placenta. b Negative control without primary antibody. c Higher magnification of A). Note absence of PROX1 in placental vessels. d Fore-skin (as positive control) contains a dense network of lymphatics (arrows). Bar = 100 μm in A,B; 15 μm in C, and 35 μm in D

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure3

Real-time RT-PCR studies of placenta in comparison to human LECs. Typical example showing expression of a) PROX1, b) LYVE1 and c) podoplanin (PDPN) in a mixture of LECs, and set to 1. PDPN is highly expressed in all areas (basal plate area, intermediate area, chorionic plate area) of the placenta. LYVE1 is also found in all areas but at lower levels. PROX1 is not expressed

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure4

Nested PCR comparing PROX1 expression in placenta, foreskin and LECs. PROX1 expression in a mixture of LECs was set to 1. Note that there is a clear signal in foreskin specimens (FS11–14), while no signal is found in placenta (basal plate area, intermediate area, chorionic plate area)

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure5

Western blot analysis of placenta (lanes 1–3) in comparison to a mixture of human LECs (lane 4) with antibodies against LYVE1, PROX1, VEGFR-3, and α-tubulin as a housekeeper protein. Lane 1 - basal plate area; lane 2 - intermediate area; lane 3 - chorionic plate area; lane4 - LECs. LYVE1 is expressed in placenta, but PROX1 and VEGFR-3 are not detectable

Full size image
Fig. 6
figure6

Immunofluorescence staining of term placenta with various antibodies. Counter-staining of nuclei with Dapi (blue). a-c) VEGFR-3 (green) is expressed in a few intra- and extra-vascular leukocytes (arrowheads in A,B). Bar = 35 μm. C) Negative control without primary antibody. d-f) CD34 (red) and LYVE1 (green) double-staining. CD34 is expressed in endothelial cells, LYVE1 in scattered stromal cells. E) Negative control without primary antibody. Bar = 120 μm in D, and 30 μm in F. g-i) CCBE1 (red) and D2–40/PDPN (green) double-staining. CCBE1 is expressed in endothelial cells, PDPN in numerous stromal cells. H) Negative control without primary antibody. Bar = 120 μm in H, and 30 μm in I. k-m) Vimentin is expressed in endothelial cells and stromal cells of terminal villi (K) and stem villi (L). M) Negative control without primary antibody. Bar = 30 μm in K, and 120 μm in M

Full size image

Discussion

Lymphatics in placenta

The discussion about the existence of lymphatics in the placenta was refueled by the description of reticular lymphatic-like D2–40/PDPN-positive networks [19]. Previously, at TEM level, vessel-like structures had been described that appeared to be lymphatics [8]. At TEM level, however, lymphatics can only be identified by the characteristic overlapping junctions between LECs, which represent valves, and are associated with anchoring filaments that connect the outer valvular leaflet with adjoining collagen fibers or fibrocytes [26]. We did not detect such ultrastructural characteristics and suggest that the lymphatics described previously in the placenta [8] may represent signs of massive intracellular fluid accumulation. In our eyes, the immuno-histological studies on PDPN shown by Bellini et al. 2012 [19] are not convincing. Nevertheless, PDPN expression in placenta has also been shown by others [18, 20]. Again, these studies used single immunohistochemical staining of placentas, not double immunofluorescence of LEC makers. We therefore reinvestigated this topic. We used well-known and newly identified BEC and LEC markers. We show that placental endothelial cells are positive for CD31, CD34, CCBE-1 and vimentin. There is no co-expression of PROX1 in CD31+ vessels, no co-expression of LYVE1 in CD34+ vessels, and no co-expression of D2–40 in CCBE1+ vessels. These data, together with the non-detectable PROX1 PCR signal, clearly show the absence of lymphatics in placenta.

We show that LYVE1 is expressed in a distinct subpopulation of stromal cells. These cells may, at least in part, represent macrophages, as shown in embryonic and adult tissues [27,28,29]. D2–40 is expressed in the majority of villous stromal cells, arguing against a specific reticular lymphatic-like system in term placenta. The relation between the intercellular (pre-lymphatic) spaces and the lymphatic vascular system was seminally studied by Friedrich Daniel von Recklinghausen (1862) [30]. Generally, we recommend that the term lymphatic vascular system (lymphatics) should be restricted to a system lined by LECs. This also applies to the para-vascular (Virchow Robin) spaces in the central nervous system, which have been designated glymphatics [31]. In sum, our data confirm the findings by Castro et al. (2011) [20] on the non-existence of lymphatics in term placenta, extend previous studies on the expression of vimentin and CCBE1 in endothelial cells [21], and challenge the existence of a reticular lymphatic-like system in the stroma of term placenta [19]. However, studies on first and second trimester placenta seem to be useful to obtain a more complete view of lymphatic functions in this rapidly changing organ.

Lymphatics in endometrium

We collected term placentas and dissected them into three areas: i.) basal plate area, ii.) intermediate area, and iii.) chorionic plate area. We expected that the basal plate area might differ from the others with respect to the expression of LEC markers, especially PROX1. However, even with nested PCR, we did not observe significant differences. The basal plate area contains (a small portion of) functional maternal tissue, and it has been shown that the endometrial stroma is invaded by lymphatics (for review see: [32]). It has been estimated that 13 and 43% of vessels in the functional and basal layers of the endometrium, respectively, are lymphatics [33]. Thereby, close association of lymphatics with spiral arterioles was observed. Interestingly, anti-lymphangiogenesis seems to occur during decidualization. PDPN-positive lymphatics have been found in non-decidualized hypersecretory endometrium, in clear contrast to the more superficial decidualized areas [34]. Our data seem to be in line with these findings. The decidua accomplishes roles, among others, in maternal tolerance. In mice, endometrial dendritic cells become trapped during decidualization and lose their potency to migrate into uterine lymphatics and lymph nodes [35]. Anti-lymphangiogenesis in decidualized human endometrium may act in the same functional direction, and may thereby support immune tolerance of the fetal allograft. Rodent endometrium, however, does not contain lymphatics [32], limiting functional studies on this system. In the human, interactions of trophoblast cells with lymphatics have been observed in the first trimester of pregnancy [36]. There, extravillous trophoblast cells invade the wall of arteries and veins to almost the same high extent, while lymphatics are invaded less often. Intraluminal trophoblast cells are found in maternal veins and lymphatics, and, with the latter, may reach the regional lymph nodes. The functional significance of these interactions remains to be studied, however, in recurrent spontaneous abortion the number of trophoblast-affected lymphatics is significantly reduced [36]. The invasion of trophoblast cells into lymphatics takes place even before the trophoblast cells remodel the spiral arteries in the decidua [37], which seems to be in line with the hypothesis that immunomodulation is an early aspect of pregnancy, while later endometrial lymphatics may lose their functional significance.

Conclusions

Our studies provide clear evidence for the absence of lymphatics in term placenta. Although some LEC markers are highly expressed in placenta, none of these markers is colocalized to endothelial cells. The transcription factor PROX1, which is essential for the development and maintenance of lymphatics, is not expressed in term placenta, neither at protein nor at RNA level. The placenta obviously possesses other mechanisms to handle typical homeostatic functions of the lymphatic vasculature. We could also not detect PROX1 expression in endometrial tissue associated with the placenta specimens. While in the first trimester the endometrial lymphatics seem to have important functions for the establishment of mother’s immunosuppressive mechanisms [36, 37], the importance of lymphatics may become reduced during maturation. If this is accompanied by anti-lymphangiogenesis in decidualized endometrium must be tested comparatively on a larger number of samples.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and the supplementary information files. Original qPCR data can be sent upon request.

Abbreviations

BEC:

Blood vascular endothelial cell

CCBE1:

Collagen and calcium binding EGF domains 1

CD31/PECAM-1:

Platelet endothelial adhesion molecule-1

CD34:

CD34 molecule

EGM-2:

Endothelial growth medium-2

LEC:

Lymphatic endothelial cell

LYVE-1:

Lymphatic vessel endothelial hyaluronic acid receptor-1

PBS:

Phosphate-buffered saline

PDPN:

Podoplanin (D2–40)

PROX1:

Prospero-related homeobox transcription factor-1

TEM:

Transmission electron microscope/microscopy

VEGF-C:

Vascular endothelial growth factor-C

VEGFR-3:

Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-3 / FLT4

References

  1. 1.

    Sauramo H. Histology of the placenta in normal, premature, and over-term cases, and in gestosis. Ann Chir Gynaecol Fenn. 1951;40:164–88.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Boyd JD, Hughes AFW. Observations on human chorionic villi using the electron microscope. J Anat. 1954;88(Pt 3):356–362.3.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Lyon FA. Fetal abnormalities associated with umbilical cords containing one umbilical artery and one umbilical vein. Obstet Gynecol. 1960;16:719.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Fox H. Haemangiomata of the placenta. J Clin Pathol. 1966;19:133–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Faierman E. The significance of one umbilical artery. Arch Dis Child. 1960;35:285–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Park D-Y, Lee J, Park I, Choi D, Lee S, Song S, et al. Lymphatic regulator PROX1 determines Schlemm’s canal integrity and identity. J Clin Invest. 2014;124:3960–74.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Wilting J, Buttler K, Schulte I, Papoutsi M, Schweigerer L, Männer J. The proepicardium delivers hemangioblasts but not lymphangioblasts to the developing heart. Dev Biol. 2007;305:451–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Rhodin JAG. Histology: a text and atlas. New York: Oxford University Press; 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Wilting J, Papoutsi M, Christ B, Nicolaides KH, von Kaisenberg CS, Borges J, et al. The transcription factor Prox1 is a marker for lymphatic endothelial cells in normal and diseased human tissues. FASEB J. 2002;16:1271–3.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Wigle JT, Oliver G. Prox1 function is required for the development of the murine lymphatic system. Cell. 1999;98:769–78.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Rodriguez-Niedenfuhr M, Papoutsi M, Christ B, Nicolaides KH, von Kaisenberg CS, Tomarev SI, et al. Prox1 is a marker of ectodermal placodes, endodermal compartments, lymphatic endothelium and lymphangioblasts. Anat Embryol (Berl). 2001;204:399–406.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Banerji S, Ni J, Wang S-X, Clasper S, Su J, Tammi R, et al. LYVE-1, a new homologue of the CD44 glycoprotein, is a lymph-specific receptor for Hyaluronan. J Cell Biol. 1999;144:789–801.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Breiteneder-Geleff S, Soleiman A, Kowalski H, Horvat R, Amann G, Kriehuber E, et al. Angiosarcomas express mixed endothelial phenotypes of blood and lymphatic capillaries: Podoplanin as a specific marker for lymphatic endothelium. Am J Pathol. 1999;154:385–94.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Kaipainen A, Korhonen J, Pajusola K, Aprelikova O, Persico MG, Terman BI, et al. The related FLT4, FLT1, and KDR receptor tyrosine kinases show distinct expression patterns in human fetal endothelial cells. J Exp Med. 1993;178:2077–88.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Wilting J, Brand-Saberi B, Kurz H, Christ B. Development of the embryonic vascular system. Cell Mol Biol Res. 1995;41:219–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Oh SJ, Jeltsch MM, Birkenhager R, McCarthy JE, Weich HA, Christ B, et al. VEGF and VEGF-C: specific induction of angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis in the differentiated avian chorioallantoic membrane. Dev Biol. 1997;188:96–109.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Gu B, Alexander JS, Gu Y, Zhang Y, Lewis DF, Wang Y. Expression of lymphatic vascular endothelial Hyaluronan Receptor-1 (LYVE-1) in the human placenta. Lymphat Res Biol. 2006;4:11–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Wang Y, Sun J, Gu Y, Zhao S, Groome LJ, Alexander JS. D2-40/podoplanin expression in the human placenta. Placenta. 2011;32:27–32.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Bellini C, Rutigliani M, Boccardo F, Campisi C, Bellini T, Bonioli E, et al. Are there lymphatic vessels in the placenta? Lymphology. 2012;45:34–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Castro E, Tony Parks W, Galambos C. Neither normal nor diseased placentas contain lymphatic vessels. Placenta. 2011;32:310–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Hasselhof V, Sperling A, Buttler K, Strobel P, Becker J, Aung T, et al. Morphological and molecular characterization of human dermal lymphatic collectors. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0164964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Blesinger H, Kaulfuss S, Aung T, Schwoch S, Prantl L, Rossler J, et al. PIK3CA mutations are specifically localized to lymphatic endothelial cells of lymphatic malformations. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0200343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Karnovsky M. A formaldehyde-glutaraldehyde fixative of high osmolality for use in electron microscopy. J Cell Biol. 1965;27:137a.

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Becker J, Erdlenbruch B, Noskova I, Schramm A, Aumailley M, Schorderet DF, et al. Keratoepithelin suppresses the progression of experimental human neuroblastomas. Cancer Res. 2006;66:5314–21.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods. 2001;25:402–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Leak LV, Burke JF. Ultrastructural studies on the lymphatic anchoring filaments. J Cell Biol. 1968;36:129–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Wilting J, Aref Y, Huang R, Tomarev SI, Schweigerer L, Christ B, et al. Dual origin of avian lymphatics. Dev Biol. 2006;292:165–73.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Buttler K, Ezaki T, Wilting J. Proliferating mesodermal cells in murine embryos exhibiting macrophage and lymphendothelial characteristics. BMC Dev Biol. 2008;8:43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Chakarov S, Lim HY, Tan L, Lim SY, See P, Lum J, et al. Two distinct interstitial macrophage populations coexist across tissues in specific subtissular niches. Science. 2019;363:eaau0964.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    von Recklinghausen FD. Die Lymphgefäße und ihre Beziehung zum Bindegewebe. 1862. https://archive.org/details/dielymphgefsseu00reckgoog/page/n9.

  31. 31.

    Iliff JJ, Wang M, Liao Y, Plogg BA, Peng W, Gundersen GA, et al. A paravascular pathway facilitates CSF flow through the brain parenchyma and the clearance of interstitial solutes, including amyloid β. Sci Transl Med. 2012;4:147ra111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Girling JE, Rogers PAW. The endometrial lymphatic vasculature: function and dysfunction. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2012;13:265–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Donoghue JF, Lederman FL, Susil BJ, Rogers PAW. Lymphangiogensis of normal endometrium and endometrial adenocarcinoma. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:1705–13.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Volchek M, Girling JE, Lash GE, Cann L, Kumar B, Robson SC, et al. Lymphatics in the human endometrium disappear during decidualization. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:2455–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Collins MK, Tay C-S, Erlebacher A. Dendritic cell entrapment within the pregnant uterus inhibits immune surveillance of the maternal/fetal interface in mice. J Clin Invest. 2009;119:2062–73.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Windsperger K, Dekan S, Pils S, Golletz C, Kunihs V, Fiala C, Kristiansen G, Knöfler M, Pollheimer J. Extravillous trophoblast invasion of venous as well as lymphatic vessels is altered in idiopathic, recurrent, spontaneous abortions. Hum Reprod. 2017;32:1208–17.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    He N, van Iperen L, de Jong D, Szuhai K, Helmerhorst FM, van der Westerlaken LA, Chuva de Sousa Lopes SM. Human extravillous trophoblasts penetrate decidual veins and lymphatics before remodeling spiral arteries during early pregnancy. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0169849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to S. Schwoch and B. Manshausen for their excellent technical assistance.

Funding

The studies were supported by the Verein zur Förderung der Lymphologie e.V., Hinterzarten, Germany. The grant supplier did not have any influence on the performance of the studies.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Deparment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University Medical School Goettingen, UMG, Kreuzbergring 36, 37075, Göttingen, Germany

    Jürgen Becker, Gilles E. Tchagou Tchangou, Christina Zelent & Jörg Wilting

  2. Department of General-, Visceral- and Pediatric Surgery, University Medical Center Goettingen, UMG, Göttingen, Germany

    Sonja Schmidt & Fritz Kahl

Authors
  1. Jürgen Becker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gilles E. Tchagou Tchangou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sonja Schmidt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Christina Zelent
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Fritz Kahl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jörg Wilting
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

GETT: Performed immunofluorescence, Western blot, TEM and qPCR; JB: Supervision of studies, data evaluation, writing draft; CZ: Performed qPCR, nested PCR and collected specimens; SS and FK performed acquisition of specimens; JW: Study design, data evaluation, writing draft and final version. All authors agree to the publication of the manuscript. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jörg Wilting.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All tissue donors gave their informed and written consent to the studies. The studies were approved by the ethics committee of the University Medical Hospital Göttingen, UMG (application no.: 18/1/18).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors have no conflicts of interest relevant to this article to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Becker, J., Tchagou Tchangou, G.E., Schmidt, S. et al. Absence of lymphatic vessels in term placenta. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 20, 380 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03073-w

Download citation

Keywords

  • Lymphatic endothelial cell - placenta - PROX1 - CCBE1 - PDPN - endometrium - anti-lymphangiogenesis

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

ISSN: 1471-2393

Contact us