Skip to main content

Factors affecting infant mortality in the general population: evidence from the 2016 Ethiopian demographic and health survey (EDHS); a multilevel analysis

Abstract

Background

Infant mortality is one of the leading public health problems globally; the problem is even more staggering in low-income countries. In Ethiopia seven in ten child deaths occurred during infancy in 2016. Even though the problem is devastating, updated information about the major determinants of infant mortality which is done on a countrywide representative sample is lacking. Therefore, this study was aimed to identify factors affecting infant mortality among the general population of Ethiopia, 2016.

Methods

A Community-based cross-sectional study was conducted in all regions of Ethiopia from January 18 to June 27, 2016. A total of 10,641 live births were included in the analysis. Data were analyzed and reported with both descriptive and analytic statistics. Bivariable and multivariable multilevel logistic regression models were fitted by accounting correlation of individuals within a cluster. Adjusted odds ratio (AOR) with 95% confidence interval was reported to show the strength of the association and its significance.

Results

A total of 10,641 live-births from the Ethiopian demographic and health survey (EDHS) data were included in the analysis. Being male infant (AOR = 1.51; 1.25, 1.82), Multiple birth (AOR = 5.49; 95% CI, 3.88–7.78), Preterm (AOR = 8.47; 95% CI 5.71, 12.57), rural residents (AOR = 1.76; 95% CI; 1.16, 2.67), from Somali region (AOR = 2.07; 1.29, 3.33), Harari (AOR = 2.14; 1.22, 3.75) and Diredawa (AOR = 1.91; 1.04, 3.51) were found to be statistically significantly associated with infant mortality.

Conclusion

The study has assessed the determinants of infant mortality based on EDHS data. Sex of the child, multiple births, prematurity, and residence were notably associated with infant mortality. The risk of infant mortality has also shown differences across different regions. Since infant mortality is still major public health problem interventions shall be done giving more attention to infants who were delivered multiple and who are preterm.

Peer Review reports

Background

Over the past two decades, the world made substantial progress in reducing infant mortality. In 2017, an estimated 6.3 million children and young adolescents died due to mostly preventable causes. Children under the age of 5 years accounted for 5.4 million of these deaths, with 2.5 million deaths occurring in the first month of life, 1.6 million between age 1–11 months, and 1.3 million between age 1–4 years [1]. According to studies done from 56 countries, infant mortality was one of the global public health concern and accounts for 144 deaths per 1000 live births [2].

In Sub-Saharan Africa, infant mortality has declined from 182 to 58 deaths per 1000 live births from 1990 to 2017. However, Globally, in 2017, half of all deaths under 5 years of age took place in sub-Saharan Africa, and another 30% in Southern Asia [1]. According to the 2016 Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey (EDHS), the infant mortality rate was 48 deaths per 1000 live births, this constitutes seven in ten under-five deaths in the country [3]. Studying infant mortality is helpful to improve child health and maternal health as well [4].

Across the globe, different studies have been conducted to identify factors affecting infant mortality. Among these not attending antenatal care follow-up [5, 6], wealth index, birth interval [7], maternal age, maternal education [8, 9], domestic violence [10], health-related behavior like delaying in seeking health care [11], high poverty and living rural areas [12], and having metabolic disorders [13] were identified.

Even though the problem is high updated information about the major determinants of infant mortality which is done on a countrywide representative sample is lacking in Ethiopia. Therefore, this study was aimed to investigate determinants of infant mortality in Ethiopia, to identify problems to be focused on in order to sustain the reduction of infant mortality and improve survival.

Methods

Study design and setting

The data was obtained after permission is found from the Measure demographic and health survery (DHS) international program (https://dhsprogram.com/). EDHS 2016 is a community-based cross-sectional study that is conducted from January 18, 2016, to June 27, 2016. Ethiopia is situated in the Horn of Africa covering an area around 1.1 million square kilometers. Ethiopia is structured into nine regional states namely Benishangul-Gumuz, Tigray, Oromia, Afar, Amhara, Somali, Southern Nations Nationalities and Peoples (SNNP), Gambela, Harari and two city administrations, Addis Ababa and Dire Dawa. From the total population of the country, only 19% live in urban areas and more than 82% of the country’s total population lives in the regional states of Amhara, SNNP, and Oromia.

EDHS data and collection procedure

The study used secondary data released by the central statistical agency (CSA). This is the fourth national representative survey done at the country level after the first three surveys conducted in 2000, 2005 and 2011. The primary aim of 2016 EDHS was to provide up-to-date information about the key demographic and health indicators. Both men and women aged 15–59 years were interviewed. Data was also collected from mothers or care-takers of live-born infants in the 5 years preceding the date of the interview. For this study, we have extracted data from the EDHS 2016 which was collected from eligible women 15–49 years of age and who were permanent residents of the selected households. The data was collected using a structured pretested questioner. Training was given for the data collectors before the start of the data collection.

Sample size, and sampling technique

The study included a total of 10,641 live births born from mothers who were interviewed about births in the preceding 5 years before the survey. We included only women in the reproductive age, from 15 to 49 years old.

The 2016 EDHS sample was stratified and selected in two stages. Each region was stratified into urban and rural areas, which yielded 21 sampling strata. Samples of enumeration areas (EAs) were selected independently in each stratum in two stages. Implicit stratification and proportional allocation were done at each of the lower administrative levels by sorting the sampling frame within each sampling stratum before sample selection. In the first stage, 645 EAs (202 from urban and 443 from rural) were selected with a proportional allocation of EA with an independent selection in each sampling stratum. A sampling frame was prepared for each selected EAs by listing households, this was used to select households in the second stage. In the second stage of selection, a fixed number of 28 households per cluster were selected with an equal probability systematic selection from the sampling frame. The survey interviewer interviewed only pre-selected households [3].

Variables of the study

The outcome variable for this study was infant mortality which was defined as the death of a live birth before the first birthday and it was estimated based on the information collected from the birth history section of the questioner which was administered to individual women.

The individual-level factors included in this study were; current age of the mother, age at first birth, sex of the household head, marital status, household wealth index, educational status both for the mother and the father, occupational status of the mother, size of the child at birth, number of living children in the household, child sex, birth order, duration of pregnancy, preceding birth interval and whether the child is of multiple births or not, place of delivery, number of antenatal care (ANC) visits, number of tetanus toxoid (TT) injections during pregnancy and mode of delivery. Wealth index for the households was originally classified into five categories by DHS which was done using principal component analysis but for easy interpretation, we reclassified the wealth scores into three categories (poor, medium, rich). The community-level factors included in this study were residence and region.

Data processing and analysis

After data cleaning was done descriptive analysis was done using frequencies and percentages. A Chi-square test was done for all categorical independent variables to check the assumptions. Both bivariable and a multivariable multilevel logistic regression model was fitted by taking the clusters as a random effect. Variables having p-value < 0.2 from the bivariable analysis were included in the final multivariable model. Variables having a p-value < 0.05 from the multi-variable model were considered as having a significant association with infant mortality. Fixed effects were presented in terms of odds ratio with its 95% CI. The result of the random effect variation was checked using the intracluster correlation (ICC). The model goodness of fitness was checked using deviance information criteria (DIC). STATA version 14 was used for data analysis.

Results

Socio-demographic characteristics of study participants

Of the total 10,641 live-births included in the analysis, 8667(81.5%) were the rural residents. The mean age of respondents was 29.23(±6.5 SD). The majority, 3161(29.7%), of the mothers were in the age group of 25–29 years. About two-thirds (6838) and half (5003) mothers and their partners did not have any formal education respectively. The larger proportion, 6307(59.3%), of the mothers were housewives and a large number, 9903 (93.06%), of the participants were married. More than half, 5775(54.3%), of the infants were from households categorized in poor income (Table 1).

Table 1 Sociodemographic characteristics of study participants EDHS 2016

Obstetric related characteristics

More than half, 5940(55.8%) of mothers give their first birth when their age was between 15 and 19. Almost two-thirds (63%) of mothers give their second to sixth births and about 3230 mothers have 3–4 live births. The average number of live births was 3 (IQR: 2, 5). The majority of live-births had an average size when they were born. More than half, 7271(68.33%) of the mothers delivered at home, and most, 10,391(97.65%), of them gave birth at term (Table 2).

Table 2 Obstetric characteristics of participants EDHS 2016

Determinants of infant mortality

Based on the multivariable multilevel logistic regression output residence, region, child sex, multiple births, and duration of pregnancy were found to be significantly associated with infant death.

The odds of infant death among male children was 1.51 times higher as compared to females (AOR = 1.51; 1.25, 1.82). The odds of death was 5.49 (AOR = 5.49; 95% CI, 3.88–7.78) times higher among multiple births as compared to singletons. Preterm infants were 8.47(AOR = 8.47; 95% CI 5.71, 12.57) times more likely to die as compared to infants born at term. The risk of infant mortality among rural residents was 1.76 (AOR = 1.76; 95% CI; 1.16, 2.67) times higher when compared to urban residents. Mortality risk was higher among children born in the east of Ethiopia; the risk of infant death among infants born in Somali (AOR = 2.07; 1.29, 3.33), Harari (AOR = 2.14; 1.22, 3.75) and Diredawa (AOR = 1.91; 1.04, 3.51) was higher as compared to Tigray region (Table 3).

Table 3 Multilevel multivariable logistic regression output for determinants of infant mortality among infants in Ethiopia, 2016

Discussions

The infant mortality rate in Ethiopia was 48 per 1000 live births in 2016. In this study, we have found sex of the child, multiple birth, duration of pregnancy, residence, and region to be significantly associated with infant mortality.

The infant mortality rate (48 per 1000 live birth) in Ethiopia was consistent with the infant mortality rate of World Health Organization (WHO) African regions (51 per 1000 live births), but it was higher than most of the developed countries like United States (5.96 per 1000 live births) [14], Canada (5.2 per 1000 live births) [15] and WHO European region (8 per 1000 live births). However, the infant mortality in Ethiopia was significantly lower than several other countries like Afganistan (110.6 per 1000 live births), Somalia (94.8 per 1000 live births), and Nigeria (69.8 per 1000 live births) [16]. The main reason for this discrepancy could be the difference in socio-economic status, health facility coverage, and other infrastructures.

The odds of infant death were higher among male infants as compared to females. This finding is in line with studies conducted in Kenya [17] and a multicenter study [18] but another study conducted in Brazil found no association between infant death and sex of the baby [8]. The higher risk of death among male infants could be explained by sex differences in genetic and biological makeup, with boys being biologically weaker and more susceptible to diseases and premature death [19].

The risk of death among infants born two or more was higher than singletons, which is supported by other studies conducted in Brazil [8, 20] Kenya [17] and Greece [21, 22]. Having multiple births can be a challenge for the mother to give care which makes the infants at risk of malnutrition and infections. The risk of being low birth weight also increases when there is multiple pregnancy and this affects the children survival [23].

Infants born preterm were more likely to die as compared to the term infants. This result is consistent with other studies [8, 24]. The reason could be respiratory morbidity, feeding difficulties, hyperbilirubinemia, temperature instability, infection, and hypoglycemia which is more common among preterm infants than infants born at term [25,26,27,28,29].

The odds of infant death among rural residents was higher than that of the urban. This finding is consistent with other studies [12, 30]. The reason behind could be the lack of access to health institutions to have ANC follow-ups or lack of media exposure which in turn affects their knowledge and practice of care for the infant [31, 32].

The odds of death among infants living in the eastern part of Ethiopia (Harari, Dire Dawa, and Somali) was higher than infants in Tigray, the northern part of the country. The possible reason could be drug abuse especially chat chewing which is more common in these areas which results in child neglect and poor healthcare-seeking behavior [3]. Mothers who use chat/ abuse drugs are also more likely to deliver a baby with low birth weight due to the effect of chat on the growth of fetus by inhibiting uteroplacental blood flow this, in turn, affects the survival of the baby [33, 34]. These regions are also known for socio-economic vulnerability and food insecurity leading to malnutrition and infant death [35].

The significant determinant of infant mortality in several studies, maternal education [8, 9], was not significantly associated with infant death in this study. The possible reason could be the difference in the content and quality of the education provided across different countries. Besides, the sample size difference could also be another contributor to this discrepancy.

Conclusions

The study has assessed the determinants of infant mortality based on EDHS data. Sex of the child, multiple births, duration of pregnancy, and residence were significantly associated with infant mortality. The risk of infant mortality has also shown differences across different regions. Since infant mortality is still major public health problem interventions shall be done giving more attention to women with multiple births and infants delivered before term. Expanding the primary health care network in more susceptible regions would also limit infant death.

Limitations

These study shares limitations of cross-sectional studies, therefore, may not be strong in establishing a cause-effect relationship. We were not directly involved in the data collection which makes us uncertain about the data quality.

Availability of data and materials

Data is available on https://dhsprogram.com/data/available-datasets.cfm

Abbreviations

ANC:

Antenatal Care

AOR:

Adjusted Odds Ratio

CI:

Confidence Interval

CSA:

Central Statistical Agency

DHS:

Demographic and Health Survey

DIS:

deviance information criteria

EA:

Enumeration Area

EDHS:

Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey

ICC:

Intracluster correlation

SD:

Standard Deviation

SNNP:

Southern Nations Nationalities and Peoples

TT:

Tetanus Toxoid

References

  1. 1.

    UNICEF. Levels & Trends in child mortality; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Rutstein SO. Factors associated with trends in infant and child mortality in developing countries during the 1990s. Lancet Glob Health. 2000;78:10.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Ethiopia. Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey, 2016. ICF International, central Statistical Agency; 2017.

  4. 4.

    Finnerty P, Provost L, O'Donnell E, Selk S, Stephens K, Kim J, et al. Using infant mortality data to improve maternal and child health programs: an application of statistical process control techniques for rare events. Matern Child Health J. 2019;23(6):739.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Dube L, Taha M, Asefa H. Determinants of infant mortality in community of Gilgel gibe field research center, Southwest Ethiopia: a matched case control study. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:401.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Leal MD, Bittencourt SD, Torres RM, Niquini RP, Souza PR Jr. Determinants of infant mortality in the Jequitinhonha Valley and in the north and northeast regions of Brazil. Rev Saude Publica. 2017;51(0):12.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Khadka KB, Lieberman LS, Giedraitis V, Bhatta L, Pandey G. The socio-economic determinants of infant mortality in Nepal: analysis of Nepal demographic health survey, 2011. BMC Pediatr. 2015;15:152.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Santos SL, Santos LB, Campelo V, Silva AR. Factors associated with infant mortality in a northeastern Brazilian capital. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2016;38(10):482–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Kiross GT, Chojenta C, Barker D, Tiruye TY, Loxton D. The effect of maternal education on infant mortality in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2019;14:7.

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Varghese S, Prasad JH, Jacob KS. Domestic violence as a risk factor for infant and child mortality: a community-based case-control study from southern India. Natl Med J India. 2013;26(3):142–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Koffi AK, Wounang RS, Nguefack F, Moluh S, Libite PR, Kalter HD. Sociodemographic, behavioral, and environmental factors of child mortality in eastern region of Cameroon: results from a social autopsy study. J Glob Health. 2017;7(1):010601.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Mohamoud YA, Kirby RS, Ehrenthal DB. Poverty, urban-rural classification and term infant mortality: a population-based multilevel analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):40.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    de Bitencourt FH, Schwartz IVD, Vianna FSL. Infant mortality in Brazil attributable to inborn errors of metabolism associated with sudden death: a time-series study (2002-2014). BMC Pediatr. 2019;19(1):52.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Mathews T, MacDorman MF, Thoma ME. Infant mortality statistics from the 2013 period linked birth/infant death data set; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Collins SA, Surmala P, Osborne G, Greenberg C, Bathory LW, Edmunds-Potvin S, et al. Causes and risk factors for infant mortality in Nunavut, Canada 1999–2011. BMC Pediatr. 2012;12(1):190.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    World Population Review: Infant mortality rate by country. https://worldpopulationreview.com/countries/infant-mortality-rate-by-country/. Accessed 14 Apr 2020.

  17. 17.

    Mutunga CJ. Environmental determinants of child mortality in Kenya. InHealth inequality and development. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 2011;89–110.

  18. 18.

    Hobcraft JN, McDonald JW, Rutstein SO. Demographic determinants of infant and early child mortality: a comparative analysis. Popul Stud. 1985;39(3):363–85.

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Pongou R. Why is infant mortality higher in boys than in girls? A new hypothesis based on preconception environment and evidence from a large sample of twins. Demography. 2013;50(2):421–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    HGD S, SMD A, AMR S, WOD C, Mesas AE. Risk factors for infant mortality in a municipality in southern Brazil: a comparison of two cohorts using hierarchical analysis. Cadernos de Saúde Pública. 2012;28(10):1915–26.

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Dimitriou G, Fouzas S, Georgakis V, Vervenioti A, Papadopoulos VG, Decavalas G, et al. Determinants of morbidity in late preterm infants. Early Hum Dev. 2010;86(9):587–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Mathews T, MacDorman MF. Infant mortality statistics from the 2010 period linked birth/infant death data set. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2013;62(8):1–26.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Luke B, Keith LG. The contribution of singletons, twins and triplets to low birth weight, infant mortality and handicap in the United States. J Reprod Med. 1992;37(8):661–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Kramer MS, Demissie K, Yang H, Platt RW, Sauvé R, Liston R. Fetal, system IHSGotCPS: the contribution of mild and moderate preterm birth to infant mortality. Jama. 2000;284(7):843–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Wang ML, Dorer DJ, Fleming MP, Catlin EA. Clinical outcomes of near-term infants. Pediatrics. 2004;114(2):372–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Dudell GG, Jain L. Hypoxic respiratory failure in the late preterm infant. Clin Perinatol. 2006;33(4):803–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Jain L. Respiratory morbidity in late-preterm infants: prevention is better than cure! Am J Perinatol. 2008;25(02):075–8.

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Bhutani VK, Johnson L. Kernicterus in late preterm infants cared for as term healthy infants. Semin Perinatol. 2006;30(2):89–97.

  29. 29.

    Garg M, Devaskar SU. Glucose metabolism in the late preterm infant. Clin Perinatol. 2006;33(4):853–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Agha S. The determinants of infant mortality in Pakistan. Soc Sci Med. 2000;51(2):199–208.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Dairo M, Owoyokun K. Factors affecting the utilization of antenatal care services in Ibadan, Nigeria. Benin J Postgrad Med. 2010;12:1.

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Zelalem Ayele D, Belayihun B, Teji K, Admassu Ayana D. Factors affecting utilization of maternal health Care Services in Kombolcha District, eastern Hararghe zone, Oromia regional state, eastern Ethiopia. Int Sch Res Notices. 2014;2014:1.

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Habel L, Kaye K, Lee J. Trends in reporting of maternal drug abuse and infant mortality among drug-exposed infants in new York City. Women Health. 1990;16(2):41–58.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Mwenda J, Arimi M, Kyama M, Langat D. Effects of khat (Catha edulis) consumption on reproductive functions: a review. East Afr Med J. 2003;80(6):318–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Sileshi M, Kadigi R, Mutabazi K, Sieber S. Analysis of households’ vulnerability to food insecurity and its influencing factors in east Hararghe, Ethiopia. J Econ Struct. 2019;8(1):41.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Measure DHS international program for providing the data set.

Funding

None.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AGB, TYA, HFW, KAG, and AML have actively participated during conception, data extraction, analysis and interpretation of data. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adhanom Gebreegziabher Baraki.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Permission was obtained to use the EDHS data from the Measure DHS international program. The data is publicly available and has no personal identifiers.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that there is no competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baraki, A.G., Akalu, T.Y., Wolde, H.F. et al. Factors affecting infant mortality in the general population: evidence from the 2016 Ethiopian demographic and health survey (EDHS); a multilevel analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 20, 299 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03002-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Infant mortality
  • Risk factors
  • Ethiopia