Skip to main content
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Epidemiology of antenatal depression in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis



Antenatal depression is a serious problem worldwide that has devastating consequences not only for the mother but also for the child and family. The pooled evidence regarding the prevalence and associated factors of antenatal depression is rare in Africa. Hence this review aimed to investigate the prevalence and associated factors of antenatal depression in Africa.


We searched CINHAL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Psychiatry online, PubMed, SCOPES, and Emcare databases for English written observational studies conducted in Africa from 2007 to 2018.Quality of studies was assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS), and studies with good quality were included in the final review. Heterogeneity across studies was assessed using the I2 and Higgins test. Publication bias was checked using Funnel plot symmetry, and Egger’s regression test and adjustment was made by using Duval and Tweedie’s Trim and Fill analysis. A random effect Meta-analysis was employed to determine the pooled estimates with 95% confidence interval (CI). Stata 14 was used for analysis. The review protocol has been registered in PROSPERO number CRD42018106717.


Of the 175 studies identified, 28 studies with an overall sample size of 17,938 were included. According to the random effect model following trim and fill analysis, the pooled prevalence of antenatal depression in Africa was 26.3% (95%CI: 22.2, 30.4%). Economic difficulties [POR = 1.87;95%CI:1.25,2.78,I2 = 88.1%], unfavorable marital condition [POR = 4.17;95% CI:1.75, 9.94, I2 = 81.2%], poor support from relatives [POR = 1.36;95% CI:1.18, 1.56, I2 = 78.0%], bad obstetric history [POR = 2.30;95% CI:1.81, 2.92), I2 = 81.7%], and history of mental health problem [POR = 2.97; 95% CI:1.74, 5.06, I2 = 92.0%]were the factors associated with antenatal depression.


The prevalence of antenatal depression is high in Africa, which showed that one in four pregnant women had depression. Pregnant mothers who had economic difficulties, bad obstetric history, poor support from relatives, previous mental health problems, and unfavorable marital conditions were at higher risk of antenatal depression. Therefore these factors should be considered while designing mental health care services for pregnant mothers.

Peer Review reports


Depression is one of the types of mood disorders characterized by markedly decreased interest or pleasure in almost all activities, significant weight loss or gain, disturbed sleep, feeling of fatigue, loss of appetite, feeling of hopelessness, reduced self-esteem and confidence, diminished ability to think or concentrate, and recurrent thoughts of death [1, 2]. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) 2017 estimate, 322 million people are living with depression, and29.9 million (9%) of these are living in Africa. Depressive disorders are ranked among the top five contributors to the global disease burden [3]. The prevalence of depression increased by 18.4% between 2005 and 2015 worldwide [4].

Antenatal depression is a non-psychotic depressive episode ranging from mild to severe symptoms that occur while the woman is pregnant [5, 6]. Women are known to be at higher risk of mental disorders like depression than males [7]. The mental health of women of reproductive age is becoming a significant public health problem both in developing and developed countries, and depression is the most prevalent mental disorder during pregnancy [8, 9]. A systematic review and meta-analysis conducted in developed countries showed the prevalence of depression to be 7.4, 12.8, and 12% at the first, second, and third trimesters of pregnancy, respectively [10]. Another meta-analysis conducted worldwide also reported the prevalence of antenatal depression that ranges from 0.5 to 51% [11]. Moreover, a similar study from low-and middle-income countries also showed a mean weighted prevalence of common mental disorders during pregnancy to be 15.6% [12]. The magnitude of antenatal depression varies across different countries in Africa, and studies showed the prevalence to be between 8.3 and 78.2% [8, 13,14,15,16,17,18].

Depressive disorders during pregnancy may have devastating consequences not only for the mother but also for the child and family [19]. Antenatal depression is identified to be a risk factor for adverse obstetric and birth outcomes like fetal growth retardation, low Apgar score, preterm birth, low birth weight, and stillbirth [13, 20,21,22,23]. Antenatal depression is also associated with increased smoking, alcohol consumption, and unhealthy behaviors [24]. These factors, together with depression, may predispose the mothers to obstetric complications [19] such as preterm labor [25], preeclampsia, abruption placenta [26, 27]. Furthermore, depression during pregnancy is also associated with postnatal depression [28], which negatively affects child development, mother-infant interaction, and the family at large [9].

Compared with women in developed countries, women in developing countries are more exposed to the risk factors for the development of antenatal depression, such as; younger age of mothers [18], low level of education, exposure to domestic violence [8] or relationship conflicts [18], history of obstetric complications, history of depression [15, 29, 30], unplanned pregnancy, lack of social support [27, 31], and low economic status [30].

Despite variations in the magnitude and associated factors of antenatal depression across different countries of Africa, pooling the available evidence and reporting the extent of the problem in a more precise way might help policymakers to prioritize the problem more than ever. Therefore, the objective of the current review is to assess the epidemiology of antenatal depression in Africa.


Search strategy and selection criteria

The study conforms to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines [32]. The reviewed articles were sourced from the following databases: MEDLINE (via Ovid), PsycINFO, CINAHL (EBSCO), Psychiatry Online, Emcare, PubMed, Scopus. Besides, google scholar, snowballing, and retrieving references from a list of eligible studies were employed. A search strategy was developed for each database by using a combination of free texts and controlled vocabularies (i.e., Mesh terms).

Example of the search strategy for PubMed:

((Prenatal depression) OR antenatal depression) OR "depression during pregnancy" Filters: Observational Study; Publication date from 2007/01/01 to 2018/08/02; Humans; English; Africa

We included all observational (cross-sectional, case-control, prospective, and retrospective cohort) studies conducted in Africa, which conducted from 2007 up to 2018 and included antenatal depression and associated factors as a primary outcome. Additionally, studies included must have used a validated tool to screen depression, and they must be available in the English language. Studies that were reviewed, studies with a poor quality based on NOS [33],and studies that were conducted on high-risk population groups were excluded from the review.

Articles were independently screened in two stages: firstly, the titles and abstracts were screened, and secondly, the full-text articles that met the eligibility criteria mentioned above were retrieved and screened further for possible inclusion by two reviewers (AFD and HFW). Where there was disagreement between the two reviewers, further discussion was made until a consensus reached.

Data extraction

The data extraction sheet was prepared to collect information on the name of the author, year of publication, country, study setting(i.e., population-based versus institution-based), study design, sample size, time of screening for the depression, the tool used to screen depression, and the prevalence estimates of antenatal depression. Data were extracted by two reviewers (AFD and AGB) from publications, and HFW crosschecked for accuracy.

Data quality and risk of bias assessment

The quality of evidence and risk of bias for studies (case-control and cohort) was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Crossectional studies were also assessed using an adapted version of NOS. The criteria include 3 categories with a maximum score of 9 points. The first is the “selection” category, which accounts for a maximum of 4 points, the second is the “comparability” category, which accounts for a maximum of 2 points, and the third is “outcome,” which accounts for a maximum of 3 points. Based on the composite score from these three categories, the studies were classified as good quality if the score is ≥7 points, fair quality 2 to 6 points, and poor quality ≤1 point [33]. Only studies with good quality were included in this review.

Data analysis

Meta-analysis was conducted to synthesize the pooled prevalence of antenatal depression and the odds ratio of the associated factors using the random effect model. To determine the extent of variation between the studies, we did a heterogeneity test using the Higgins method, which was quantified by I2 values [34]. Publication bias was assessed by using the symmetry of the Funnel plot and statistically by Egger’s regression test. Duval and Tweedie’s Trim and fill analysis was done to correct for publication bias [34, 35]. Sub-group analysis for the pooled prevalence was done, and sensitivity analysis was also carried out to detect any effect of outlier study that significantly affected the pooled estimate. Odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval was used to assess the association between antenatal depression and associated factors. The analysis was done using Stata version 14 software [36].

Protocol registration

The review protocol has been registered in PROSPERO with protocol number CRD42018106717.



We conducted an electronic literature search and identified 175 unique records of journal articles and 124 duplicates that were removed. After meticulous review of the titles and abstracts, we excluded 22 articles because of difference in population under study [37,38,39,40,41,42] and outcome of the study [43,44,45], full text not found and study area not known [46,47,48,49,50], reviews [5, 19, 51,52,53] and conducted in restricted population [54, 55]. We obtained full-text copies of 29 records for further review. Of those full-text articles, one article [56] was excluded because of poor quality. Finally, 28 articles with an overall sample size of 17, 938 were included in the narrative review and Meta-analysis (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

PRISMA statement presentation for systematic review and meta-analysis of antenatal depression in African countries

Included study characteristics

The sample size across the studies ranges from 109 [57] to 2086 [58] pregnant mothers. The selected studies for Meta-analysis were geographically diverse and included 10 African countries with the majority (9 studies) of the studies from Ethiopia [17, 27, 30, 31, 45, 59,60,61,62] followed by South Africa, which contains five studies [18, 57, 63,64,65]. In terms of the study setting majority of the included studies [20] were health institution based [8, 13, 15, 16, 27, 57, 59,60,61,62,63,64, 66,67,68,69,70,71,72] and the rest were community-based [17, 18, 30, 31, 45, 58, 65, 73]. Moreover, 21 studies used cross-sectional [8, 15,16,17,18, 27, 30, 31, 57, 59,60,61,62,63,64, 66,67,68,69,70, 73], six studies used cohort [13, 45, 58, 71, 72], and one study used longitudinal study design [65].

The included studies used different tools for screening depression. The tool used by the majority [11] of the studies was EPDS at a different cut off value [18, 27, 30, 31, 62, 63, 65, 69, 70, 72, 73] followed by PHQ [5] [13, 17, 45, 71]. Most of the included studies [13] screened depression in all trimesters of pregnancy [8, 16, 18, 27, 30, 59, 60, 62, 64,65,66, 69, 70] followed by screening in the third trimester of pregnancy, which was applied in 8 studies [13, 15, 31, 61, 63, 71, 73]. The prevalence of depression among the included studies ranges from 8.3% [15] to 78% [16] and all of the included studies have high quality based on NOS (Table 1).

Table 1 Summary of studies conducted on antenatal depression in African countries (N = 64, 2007–2018)

Pooled prevalence of antenatal depression

The pooled prevalence of antenatal depression in Africa from 28 studies was found to be 26.3% (95% CI: 22.2, 30.4%;I2= 97.7%).As eggers test was found significant, the final pooled prevalence was corrected for Duval and Tweedie’s trim and fill analysis and was 26.3% (95%CI; 22.2, 30.4%) (Figs. 2 and 3). The meta-regression was conducted to identify study characteristics accounted for heterogeneity. The pooled prevalence was higher at 27.01% (95% CI: 21.15, 32.87%)in Sub Saharan Africa (SSA) than the pooled rate in Ethiopia at 24.91% (95% CI: 20.35, 29.46%) (Fig. 4).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Funnel plot testing publication bias (random, N = 27)

Fig. 3
figure 3

Filled funnel plot after adjusting for publication bias

Fig. 4
figure 4

Forest plot for meta-analysis of antenatal depression prevalence sub-analyzed by geography in Africa (N = 28, random effect model)

Besides, subgroup analysis was done based on the income of countries, time of depression measurement, study setting, study design, year of publication, and tool used to screen depression. Based on the time of screening for depression in the course of pregnancy, the highest pooled prevalence of antenatal depression was observed in the second trimester, 32.20% (95% CI: 26.13, 38.28%). On the other hand, a significantly lowest prevalence of was found from a single study with a screening time in the first trimester, 9.90% (95% CI: 8.60, 11.20%). Depending on the study setting, the pooled prevalence of antenatal depression for 19 health institution based studies was 26.77% (95%: 22.54, 30.99%).

Based on the study design, the pooled prevalence of antenatal depression for seven studies, which applied longitudinal study design was higher, at 28.49% (95% CI: 18.47, 38.52%), as compared to those using cross-sectional study designs. In terms of the sample size, the pooled prevalence of antenatal depression for 19 studies with a sample size above 384 was 27.43% (95% CI: 22.54, 32.31%). Concerning the year of publication, the highest pooled prevalence was observed from 4 studies published between 2010 and 2012, 39.44% (95% CI: 37.37, 41.50%). On the other hand, the lowest pooled prevalence of 9.46% (95% CI: 6.46%, 12.46) was observed from studies published between 2007 and 2009. Depending on the screening tool used, the pooled prevalence of antenatal depression was the highest for 11 studies that used EPDS (PP = 28.89%; 95% CI: 22.79, 34.98%) (Table 2).

Table 2 Sub-analysis of studies on antenatal depression conducted in Africa (N = 27, random effect)

Sensitivity analysis was completed after excluding the study with the highest prevalence [16], and it showed that omission of any of the incorporated studies did not change the pooled prevalence of antenatal depression (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Sensitivity analysis for studies included in the meta-analysis

Based on the result from Meta-analysis of identified risk factors, economic difficulties [POR = 1.87 (95% CI:1.25, 2.78), I2 = 88.1%], unfavorable marital condition [POR = 4.17 (95% CI:1.75, 9.94), I2 = 81.2%], poor support from relatives [POR = 1.36 (95% CI:1.18, 1.56), I2 = 78.0%], bad obstetric history [POR = 2.30 (95% CI:1.81, 2.92), I2 = 81.7%], and having history of mental health problem [POR = 2.97 (95% CI:1.74, 5.06), I2 = 92.0%] were the major factors associated with antenatal depression (Figs. 6 and 7).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Meta-analysis of major risk factors associated with antenatal depression in Africa

Fig. 7
figure 7

Meta-analysis of major risk factors associated with antenatal depression in Africa


The current review assessed the prevalence of antenatal depression and its associated factors in Africa. Our review showed the pooled prevalence of depression among African pregnant women was 26.3%, and it is significantly associated with economic difficulties, poor support from relatives, bad obstetric history (such as previous pregnancy loss and complications), unfavorable marital condition, and history of mental health problems.

The result was consistent with a review conducted in low-and middle-income countries, which showed a pooled prevalence of 25.3% [74]. The pooled prevalence of antenatal depression from this review was found to be higher than other reviews done in Africa and low-and middle-income countries, which showed that the weighted mean prevalence of common mental health disorders to be 11.3 and 15.6%, respectively [12, 75]. This might indicate that antenatal depression is increasing over time. Our estimate was also higher than another systematic review and meta-analysis done in developed countries, which showed the pooled prevalence at the first, second, and third trimesters to be 7.4, 12.8, and 12%, respectively [10]. The higher pooled prevalence in our review could be mothers in Africa are exposed to additional socio-economic problems and stressful life events than mothers from developed countries, which increases their risk of developing depression.

The odds of having antenatal depression among women who have economic difficulties was found to be 1.87. This result was consistent with other systematic reviews published in Ethiopia, low-and middle-income countries, and worldwide [5, 12, 76, 77]. The finding was also supported by another large scale prospective cohort study conducted to assess the association between low socioeconomic status and antenatal depression [78]. Mothers in such economic difficulties would worry about the family and the coming babies’ basic needs, and this can also be related to family food insecurity, which is highly associated with antenatal depression [31, 79].

This review showed that unfavorable marital condition (explained as divorce, relationship difficulties, being single at the time of pregnancy, marital conflict) was significantly associated with increased risk of antenatal depression by4.17 times. A similar association was found from other systematic reviews done in Ethiopia and other low-and middle-income countries [5, 12]. This might be because of a lack of support from husband at the time of pregnancy as those women who receive husbands’ support during their pregnancy may be well empowered to deal with their pregnancy and their home responsibility. Another reason could be those women with unfavorable marital conditions might live alone, practice more loneliness, and low self-confidence that may predispose them to depression.

This review also showed that there was an increased risk of antenatal depression among women who had poor support from relatives, which is supported by other previous reviews [12, 76, 80]. The possible reason could be because social support reduces stressful life events by providing informational, instrumental, and emotional support during pregnancy [80, 81]. Perhaps, the objective evaluation of social support that women received during pregnancy may be challenging as it has been noticed that depressed women tend to feel less supported than they objectively are [82]. Women with a bad obstetric history were found to be at an increased risk of antenatal depression by an odds of 2.30 times. This result was similar to other reviews done in Ethiopia [5, 77] and worldwide [80]. This is directly associated with the mother’s fear of facing similar complications in her current pregnancy like the previous one.

Women with a history of mental health problems also had three-fold increased odds of developing antenatal depression in the current pregnancy as compared to those who did not report such history. This result was supported by other reviews done in Ethiopia [5, 77] and worldwide [80]. Having a history of mental disorders, including depressive episodes, may indicate the mother’s biological vulnerability to the disorder, which may indirectly cause pregnancy mood changes in the current pregnancy [83].

The strength of this review is that it included only high-quality studies that scored ≥ seven based on the NOS criteria, and this may increase the reliability and validity of the findings. Besides, all available observational studies in Africa that satisfied our inclusion criteria were included, and this would increase the review generalizability. However, the use of screening instruments in prevalence studies relies on symptom identification rather than diagnosis, and this affects the validity of the review as screening tools over or underestimate the actual effect estimate. Though a subgroup and random-effect meta-analysis were conducted to minimize the effect of heterogeneity, the prevalence estimates might still be affected by the inherent heterogeneity of included studies, which may be due to the difference in the study area, methodology, study period and the type of screening tool used in the studies. Therefore, policymakers should make the interpretations of these results with caution by considering this inherent heterogeneity. Further standardization of screening tool that would be used in different countries might help to minimize the observed heterogeneity. Moreover, excluding works of literature that are not published in the English language may create selection bias. The clinical importance of this review is that it clearly showed that depression during pregnancy is highly prevalent and needs to be targeted for screening and early treatment.


We found that one in four mothers had antenatal depression, and it is independently associated with a mother’s economic difficulties, poor support from relatives, unfavorable marital condition, previous history of mental disorder, and bad obstetric history. Depression screening during pregnancy follow up in African health facilities is highly relevant to early detect and intervene in women’s at risk of antenatal depression. This would help the achievement of sustainable development goal five (SDG-5) through improving maternal mental health.

Availability of data and materials

All the materials and data on which the findings of this review are based are presented within the manuscript.



Beck Depression Inventory


Confidence Interval


Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of mental disorders version 4


Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale


Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale


Low And Middle-Income Countries


Newcastle Ottawa Scale


Patient Health Questionnaire 9


Pooled Odds Ratio


Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis


Sustainable Development Goal 5


Sub Saharan Africa


World Health Organization


  1. Understanding mental illness; a guide to brain disorders, medication, and therapy. 2011.

  2. WHO Guidelines Approved by the Guidelines Review Committee. MhGAP Intervention Guide for Mental, Neurological and Substance Use Disorders in Non-Specialized Health Settings: Mental Health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP). Geneva: World Health Organization World Health Organization; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  3. WHO. Depression and Other Common Mental Disorders, Global Health Estimates. 2017.

  4. GBD. Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators, and others. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet. 2016;388:10053.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mersha AG, Abebe SA, Sori LM, Abegaz TM. Prevalence and associated factors of perinatal depression in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Depress Res Treat. 2018.

  6. Abujilban SK, Abuidhail J, Al-Modallal H, Hamaideh S, Mosemli O. Predictors of antenatal depression among Jordanian pregnant women in their third trimester. Health Care Women Int. 2014;35(2):200–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Deecher D, Andree TH, Sloan D, Schechter LE. From menarche to menopause: exploring the underlying biology of depression in women experiencing hormonal changes. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2008;33(1):3–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Abdelhai R, Mosleh H. Screening for antepartum anxiety and depression and their association with domestic violence among Egyptian pregnant women. J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 2015;90(3):101–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rahman A, Iqbal Z, Bunn J, Lovel H, Harrington R. Impact of maternal depression on infant nutritional status and illness: a cohort study. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2004;61(9):946–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bennett HA, Einarson A, Taddio A, Koren G, Einarson TR. Prevalence of depression during pregnancy: systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103(4):698–709.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Grote NK, Bridge JA, Gavin AR, Melville JL, Iyengar S, Katon WJ. A meta-analysis of depression during pregnancy and the risk of preterm birth, low birth weight, and intrauterine growth restriction. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010;67.

  12. Fisher J. Cabral de Mello M, Patel V, Rahman a, Tran T, Holton S, et al. prevalence and determinants of common perinatal mental disorders in women in low- and lower-middle-income countries: a systematic review. Bull World Health Organ. 2012;90(2):139–49H.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bindt C, Guo N, Bonle MT, Appiah-Poku J, Hinz R, Barthel D, et al. No association between antenatal common mental disorders in low-obstetric risk women and adverse birth outcomes in their offspring: results from the CDS study in Ghana and cote D'Ivoire. PLoS One. 2013;8(11):e80711.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Assefa GW. Prevalence and factors associated with antenatal depression among women following antenatal care at Shashemane health facilities, South Ethiopia. Ann Glob Health. 2015;81(1):90.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Adewuya AO, Ola BA, Aloba OO, Dada AO, Fasoto OO. Prevalence and correlates of depression in late pregnancy among Nigerian women. Depression Anxiety. 2007;24(1):15–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mahenge B, Stockl H, Likindikoki S, Kaaya S, Mbwambo J. The prevalence of mental health morbidity and its associated factors among women attending a prenatal clinic in Tanzania. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;130(3):261–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bitew T, Hanlon C, Kebede E, Medhin G, Fekadu A. Antenatal depressive symptoms and maternal health care utilisation: a population-based study of pregnant women in Ethiopia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16(1):301.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Hartley M, Tomlinson M, Greco E, Comulada WS, Stewart J, le Roux I, et al. Depressed mood in pregnancy: prevalence and correlates in two Cape Town peri-urban settlements. Reprod Health. 2011;8(1):9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Alder J, Fink N, Bitzer J, Hösli I, Holzgreve W. Depression and anxiety during pregnancy: a risk factor for obstetric, fetal and neonatal outcome? A critical review of the literature. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2007;20(3):189–209.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Chang HY, Keyes KM, Lee KS, Choi IA, Kim SJ, Kim KW, et al. Prenatal maternal depression is associated with low birth weight through shorter gestational age in term infants in Korea. Early Hum Dev. 2014;90(1):15–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nasreen HE, Kabir ZN, Forsell Y, Edhborg M. Low birth weight in offspring of women with depressive and anxiety symptoms during pregnancy: results from a population based study in Bangladesh. BMC Public Health. 2010;10(1):515.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Rao D, Kumar S, Mohanraj R, Frey S, Manhart LE, L. Kaysen D. The impact of domestic violence and depressive symptoms on preterm birth in South India. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2016;51(2):225–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Saeed A, Raana T, Saeed AM, Humayun A. Effect of antenatal depression on maternal dietary intake and neonatal outcome: a prospective cohort. Nutr J. 2016;15(1):64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lee AM, Lam SK, Lau SMSM, Chong CSY, Chui HW, Fong DYT. Prevalence, course, and risk factors for antenatal anxiety and depression. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110(5):1102–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Orr ST, James SA, Blackmore PC. Maternal prenatal depressive symptoms and spontaneous preterm births among African-American women in Baltimore, Maryland. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;156(9):797–802.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Evans J, Heron J, Patel RR, Wiles N. Depressive symptoms during pregnancy and low birth weight at term: longitudinal study. Br J Psychiatry. 2007;191.

  27. Biratu A, Haile D. Prevalence of antenatal depression and associated factors among pregnant women in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. Reprod Health. 2015;12:99.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Black MM, Baqui AH, Zaman K, McNary SW, Le K, Arifeen SE, et al. Depressive symptoms among rural Bangladeshi mothers: implications for infant development. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2007;48(8):764–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ajinkya S, Jadhav PR, Srivastava NN. Depression during pregnancy: prevalence and obstetric risk factors among pregnant women attending a tertiary care hospital in Navi Mumbai. Ind Psychiatry J. 2013;22(1):37–40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Bisetegn TA, Mihretie G, Muche T. Prevalence and predictors of depression among pregnant women in debretabor town, northwest Ethiopia. PLoS One. 2016;11(9).

  31. Dibaba Y, Fantahun M, Hindin MJ. The association of unwanted pregnancy and social support with depressive symptoms in pregnancy: evidence from rural southwestern Ethiopia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13.

  32. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000100.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Wells G, Shea B, O’connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 2014. oxford. ASp; 2015.

  34. Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JP, Rothstein HR. Introduction to meta-analysis: John Wiley & Sons; 2011.

  35. Duval S, Tweedie R. A nonparametric “trim and fill” method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis. J Am Stat Assoc. 2000;95(449):89–98.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Stata A. Stata Base reference manual release 14. 2015.

  37. Dailey DE, Humphreys JC. Social stressors associated with antepartum depressive symptoms in low-income African American women. Public Health Nurs. 2011;28(3):203–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Jallo N, Elswick RK Jr, Kinser P, Masho S, Price SK, Svikis DS. Prevalence and predictors of depressive symptoms in pregnant African American women. Issues Mental Health Nurs. 2015;36(11):860–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Luke S, Salihu HM, Alio AP, Mbah AK, Jeffers D, Berry EL, et al. Risk factors for major antenatal depression among low-income African American women. J Women's Health. 2009;18(11):1841–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Jackson FM, Rowley DL, Curry OT. Contextualized stress, global stress, and depression in well-educated, pregnant, African-American women. Women's Health Issues. 2012;22(3):e329–e36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Luiza JW, Gallaher MJ, Powers RW. Urinary cortisol and depression in early pregnancy: role of adiposity and race. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15(1):30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Shen JJ, Lin F, Jackson T. Risk of prenatal depression: differences by race. Ethnicity Dis. 2010;20(1):35–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Bennett IM, Schott W, Krutikova S, Behrman JR. Maternal mental health, and child growth and development, in four low-income and middle-income countries. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2015;70(2):168–73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Jebena MG, Taha M, Nakajima M, Lemieux A, Lemessa F, Hoffman R, et al. Household food insecurity and mental distress among pregnant women in Southwestern Ethiopia: A cross sectional study design. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15(1).

  45. Bitew T, Hanlon C, Kebede E, Honikman S, Fekadu A. Antenatal depressive symptoms and perinatal complications: a prospective study in rural Ethiopia. BMC Psychiatr. 2017;17(1):301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Glover V. Maternal depression, anxiety and stress during pregnancy and child outcome; what needs to be done. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;28(1):25–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Gerardin P. Characteristics and clinical consequences of prenatal depression. Main results of a prospective case-control study on perinatal depression from pregnancy to one year-old infant. Neuropsychiatrie de l'Enfance et de l'Adolescence. 2012;60(2):138–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Freeman MP. Perinatal psychiatry: risk factors, treatment data, and specific challenges for clinical researchers. J Clin Psychiatry. 2008;69(4):633–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Hurst J, Zeanah P, Lewis L, Mills K. Examining the association between nutrition and psychosocial factors in first-time pregnant women: a cross-sectional pilot study. Int J Disabil Hum Dev. 2012;11(4):343–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Hwa-Froelich DA, Loveland Cook CA, Flick LH. Maternal sensitivity and communication styles: Mothers with depression: Journal of Early Intervention. 31 (1) (pp 44–66), 2008. Date of Publication: December 2008.; 2008.

  51. Fuller-Tyszkiewicz M, Skouteris H, Watson BE, Hill B. Body dissatisfaction during pregnancy: a systematic review of cross-sectional and prospective correlates. J Health Psychol. 2013;18(11):1411–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Leung BM, Kaplan BJ. Perinatal depression: prevalence, risks, and the nutrition link--a review of the literature. J Am Diet Assoc. 2009;109(9):1566–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Hanlon C. Maternal depression in low- and middle-income countries. Int Health. 2013;5(1):4–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Rochat T, Tomlinson M, Newell M, Stein A. Depression among pregnant women testing for HIV in rural South Africa: Implications for VCT. 9th International AIDS Impact Conference; Botswana. 2009.

  55. Osok J, Kigamwa P, Vander Stoep A, Huang K-Y, Kumar M. Depression and its psychosocial risk factors in pregnant Kenyan adolescents: a cross-sectional study in a community health Centre of Nairobi. BMC Psychiatry. 2018;18(1):136.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Tsai AC, Tomlinson M, Comulada WS, Rotheram-Borus MJ. Food insufficiency, depression, and the modifying role of social support: evidence from a population-based, prospective cohort of pregnant women in peri-urban South Africa. Soc Sci Med. 2016;151:69–77.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Rochat TJ, Tomlinson M, Barnighausen T, Newell ML, Stein A. The prevalence and clinical presentation of antenatal depression in rural South Africa. J Affect Disord. 2011;135(1–3):362–73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Weobong B, Soremekun S, Ten Asbroek AH, Amenga-Etego S, Danso S, Owusu-Agyei S, et al. Prevalence and determinants of antenatal depression among pregnant women in a predominantly rural population in Ghana: the DON population-based study. J Affect Disord. 2014;165:1–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Ayele TA, Azale T, Alemu K, Abdissa Z, Mulat H, Fekadu A. Prevalence and associated factors of antenatal depression among women attending antenatal Care Service at Gondar University Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia. PLoS One. 2016;11(5):e0155125.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Mossie TB, Sibhatu AK, Dargie A, Ayele AD. Prevalence of antenatal depressive symptoms and associated factors among pregnant women in Maichew, North Ethiopia: an institution based study. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2017;27(1):59–66.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Sahile MA, Segni MT, Awoke T, Bekele D. Prevalence and predictors of antenatal depressive symptoms among women attending Adama hospital antenatal clinic, Adama, Ethiopia. Int J Nurs Midwifery. 2017;9(5):58–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Gemta WA. Prevalence and factors associated with antenatal depression among women following antenatal care at Shashemane health facilities, South Ethiopia. Ann Glob Health. 2015;1(81):90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Manikkam L, Burns JK. Antenatal depression and its risk factors: an urban prevalence study in KwaZulu-Natal. S Afr Med J. 2012;102.

  64. Heyningen TV, Myer L, Onah M, Tomlinson M, Field S, Honikman S. Antenatal depression and adversity in urban South Africa. J Affect Disord. 2016;203:121–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Tsai AC, Tomlinson M, Comulada WS, Rotheram-Borus MJ. Intimate partner violence and depression symptom severity among south African women during pregnancy and postpartum: population-based prospective cohort study. PLoS Med. 2016;13(1):e1001943.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Esimai O, Fatoye F, Quiah A, Vidal O, Momoh R. Antepartum anxiety and depressive symptoms: a study of Nigerian women during the three trimesters of pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;28.

  67. Kaaya SF, Mbwambo JK, Kilonzo GP, Van Den Borne H, Leshabari MT, Fawzi MC, et al. Socio-economic and partner relationship factors associated with antenatal depressive morbidity among pregnant women in Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania. Tanzan J Health Res. 2010;12(1):23–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Stewart RC, Umar E, Tomenson B, Creed F. A cross-sectional study of antenatal depression and associated factors in Malawi. Arch Women’s Mental Health. 2014;17(2):145–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Rwakarema M, Premji SS, Nyanza EC, Riziki P, Palacios-Derflingher L. Antenatal depression is associated with pregnancy-related anxiety, partner relations, and wealth in women in northern Tanzania: a cross-sectional study. BMC Womens Health. 2015;15:68.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Thompson O, Ajayi I. Prevalence of antenatal depression and associated risk factors among pregnant women attending antenatal clinics in Abeokuta north local government area, Nigeria Depression Research and Treatment 2016;2016:4518979.

  71. Guo N, Bindt C, Te Bonle M, Appiah-Poku J, Hinz R, Barthel D, et al. Association of antepartum and postpartum depression in Ghanaian and Ivorian women with febrile illness in their offspring: a prospective birth cohort study. Am J Epidemiol. 2013;178(9):1394–402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Mochache K, Mathai M, Gachuno O, Vander Stoep A, Kumar M. Depression during pregnancy and preterm delivery: a prospective cohort study among women attending antenatal clinic at Pumwani maternity hospital. Ann General Psychiatry. 2018;17(1):31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Målqvist M, Clarke K, Matsebula T, Bergman M, Tomlinson M. Screening for antepartum depression through community health outreach in Swaziland. J Community Health. 2016;41(5):946–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Gelaye B, Rondon MB, Araya R, Williams MA. Epidemiology of maternal depression, risk factors, and child outcomes in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016;3(10):973–82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Sawyer A, Ayers S, Smith H. Pre-and postnatal psychological wellbeing in Africa: a systematic review. J Affect Disord. 2010;123(1–3):17–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Lancaster CA, Gold KJ, Flynn HA, Yoo H, Marcus SM, Davis MM. Risk factors for depressive symptoms during pregnancy: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202(1):5–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Getinet W, Amare T, Boru B, Shumet S, Worku W, Azale T. Prevalence and risk factors for antenatal depression in Ethiopia: systematic review. Depress Res Treat 2018;2018.

  78. Verbeek T, Bockting C, Beijers C, Meijer J, Van Pampus M, Burger H. Low socio-economic position increases the adverse effect of negative life events on anxiety and depression during pregnancy. Eur Psychiatr. 2015;30:742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Abrahams Z, Lund C, Field S, Honikman S. Factors associated with household food insecurity and depression in pregnant south African women from a low socio-economic setting: a cross-sectional study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2018;53(4):363–72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Biaggi A, Conroy S, Pawlby S, Pariante CM. Identifying the women at risk of antenatal anxiety and depression: a systematic review. J Affect Disord. 2016;191:62–77.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Elsenbruch S, Benson S, Rücke M, Rose M, Dudenhausen J, Pincus-Knackstedt MK, et al. Social support during pregnancy: effects on maternal depressive symptoms, smoking and pregnancy outcome. Hum Reprod. 2006;22(3):869–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Robertson E, Grace S, Wallington T, Stewart DE. Antenatal risk factors for postpartum depression: a synthesis of recent literature. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2004;26(4):289–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Altshuler LL, Hendrick V, Cohen LS. Course of mood and anxiety disorders during pregnancy and the postpartum period. J Clin Psychiatr. 1998.

Download references


We would like to thank Angie Willcocks from the University of South Australia for her expert advice and proofreading of this review.

Consent for publication.

Not applicable.


Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



AFD, TYA, AGB, HFW: conceived the design; AFD develop the search strategy; AFD, TYA, AGB, HFW: searched, screened, and appraised the studies, and extract the data: AFD analyzed the data; AFD, TYA, AGB, HFW: drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript for publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haileab Fekadu Wolde.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Since this study is an investigation of the already available literature for the public, there is no need for ethical approval.

Competing interests

All authors declared that there is no competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dadi, A.F., Wolde, H.F., Baraki, A.G. et al. Epidemiology of antenatal depression in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 20, 251 (2020).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: