Skip to main content

Table 2 Sub-analysis of studies on antenatal depression conducted in Africa (N = 27, random effect)

From: Epidemiology of antenatal depression in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Variable for sub-analysis

Number of studies

Sample size (N)

Pooled prevalence (95%CI) random effect model

The income of the countries

 Low-income

12

7115

26.54(22.23, 30.85)

 Middle-income

15

7775

26.13 (19.60, 32.64)

Time of depression measurement

 1st trimester

1

2086

9.90 (8.60, 11.20)

 2nd trimester

5

3803

32.20 (26.13, 38.28)

 3rd trimester

8

4312

25.39 (20.15, 30.65)

 All trimester

13

4689

25.71 (19.30, 32.11)

Study setting

 Community-based

8

7891

25.11 (16.52, 33.69)

 Health institution based

19

6999

26.77 (22.54, 30.99)

Study design

 Longitudinal

7

5353

28.49 (18.47, 38.52)

 Cross sectional

20

9537

25.50 (21.16, 29.84)

Sample size

  < =384

8

1626

23.59 (15.49, 31.69)

  > 384

19

14,757

27.43 (22.54, 32.31)

Year of Publication

 2007–2009

2

375

9.46 (6.46, 12.46)

 2010–2012

4

2118

39.44 (37.37, 41.50)

 2013–2015

11

7525

22.75 (17.32, 28.18)

 2016–2018

10

6740

27.92 (22.41, 33.43)

Type of screening tool used

 EPDS

11

6898

28.89 (22.79, 34.98)

 PHQ-9

5

4578

28.54 (27.23, 29.84)

 Diagnostic tools (DSM-IV,CIS-R)

3

665

25.22 (8.33, 42.11)

 Other (CES-D, SRQ, HSC, BDI)

8

4617

21.96 (14.30, 29.62)