Skip to main content

Client perceived quality of the postnatal care provided by public sector specialized care institutions following a normal vaginal delivery in Sri Lanka: a cross sectional study

Abstract

Background

Majority of the maternal and neonatal adverse events take place during the postnatal period. Provision of high-quality care during this period can minimize these events. Assessment of mothers’ perceptions of the quality of care received by them provides valuable feedback to improve the care and ultimately outcomes.

Methods

A cross sectional survey was conducted in specialized institutions of Colombo district, Sri Lanka, to assess the maternal perceptions of the quality of regular postnatal care and its correlations, using an interviewer administered questionnaire. The questionnaire contained 23 items distributed under three main domains: technical and information domain, interpersonal care domain and ward facilities and cleanliness domain. Each item was given a score from 1 to 5 and total scores were calculated for the total questionnaire and for each domain. Descriptive statistics were used to assess the perceptions and multivariate analysis was conducted to assess the significant correlates of positive perceptions.

Results

The median score obtained for the questionnaire was 108, (Inter Quartile Range 96–114). The median scores of the technical care and information domain, interpersonal care domain and ward facilities and cleanliness domain were 43 (IQR 38–45), 33 (IQR 30–35) and 32 (IQR 28–35) respectively. Attending teaching/ specialized hospitals (aOR=1.6, p < 0.001), 20–35 age group (1.8, p = 0.024), and services such as initiation of breast feeding within 1 h of delivery (2.1, p = 0.009), pain relief during episiotomy suturing (2.2, p < 0.001), practicing Kangaroo Mother Care (1.4, p = 0.035), receiving health advices by doctors or midwives (2.1, p < 0.001) were significant correlates of positive perceptions.

Conclusions

Majority of mothers had favourable perceptions of the quality of care received by them. However, the ward facilities and environment domain has obtained lower ratings compared to technical and interpersonal care domains. Several services were significantly associated with favourable perceptions. Authorities should consider these findings when attempting to improve care quality. Further, this assessment should be carried out regularly to obtain more current data.

Peer Review reports

Background

The first few weeks following the delivery of a baby is a crucial period for both mother and the newborn as a majority of maternal and newborn adverse outcomes takes place in this period [1,2,3]. Immediate postnatal period or the first 24 h after delivery is the most vital period, where more than half of the postpartum maternal deaths [4] and around 40% of the newborn deaths occur [5]. Provision of evidence-based care with adequate quality during this period is vital to ensure a smooth recovery of the mother and the baby.

Quality of health care is now considered an essential component of health services [6]. It ensures that services are effective, efficient, patient centered, cost effective and safe [4]. Further, it should be regularly monitored and upgraded to ensure best outcomes. Assessment of client experiences and perceptions of the care is increasingly being considered as a useful monitoring measure [7,8,9,10]. Client perceived quality is defined as “subjective and dynamic perception of the extent to which expected health care is received by a person” [11]. It provides health workers and authorities with valuable information to improve the service quality and render it patient-centered. Client perceptions of the quality of service received by them will also determine their level of satisfaction with the services. It is known that unsatisfied clients may not return to the same facility even during an emergency and even if the facility provides state of the art care [6, 10].

In Sri Lanka, around 99.9% women receive institutional postnatal care, and a clear majority of them (94.6%) receive care from public sector institutions [12]. Evidence based practices are implemented in these institutions through national guidelines, and regular supervision is aimed to maintain the highest level of care. However, client perceived quality is not a popular measure of quality in this context. Further, though studies have assessed mothers’ perceptions and satisfaction of antenatal and intra-natal services [13, 14], studies on institutional postnatal care as sparse in Sri Lanka.

Therefore, this study was conducted with the aim of assessing the quality of the regular postnatal care provided by the public sector specialized institutions in the district of Colombo, Sri Lanka, following a normal vaginal delivery (NVD), from the mothers’ perspective, and the factors that are associated with their perceptions. This is a component of a larger study that evaluated the quality of the regular institutional postnatal care comprehensively. We hope that the information gained from this study would be beneficial to improve the institutional postnatal care services in Sri Lanka to meet mothers’ expectations.

Methods

A cross sectional analytical study was conducted from the 1st December 2016 to the 30th April 2017 in the public sector specialized health institutions in Colombo district. Colombo District is situated in the south west of Sri Lanka and has an area of 699 km2. It is a mixture of urban, semi urban, rural and estate areas. It has the highest population in Sri Lanka, which is 20,359,439 [15].

Study setting

Curative health sector in Sri Lanka is comprised of three levels: primary, secondary and tertiary. Primary health services provide the field and the first contact care, while the secondary and tertiary level institutions provide specialized services under the guidance of specialist health professionals. Thus, in the institutions providing specialized Maternal and Newborn Health (MNH) care, both routine basic care and comprehensive care for emergencies and complications are provided through a team of trained health care providers.

Of the 330,898 deliveries that that took place in government hospitals in 2014, the highest proportion (12.6%) took place in Colombo district [12]. It is worthwhile to note that Colombo district also reports the lowest rate of vaginal deliveries, which was 55.1% in year 2017 [16]. This may be attributed to the fact that the two main referral institutions for pregnant mothers are situated in this district.

The six state sector health care institutions providing specialized MNH care in Colombo account for 98.4% of the total deliveries [17]. These six institutions include three base hospitals (secondary level), one teaching hospital (tertiary level) and two special hospitals specialized to provide women’s’ health services only. Altogether, there are 17 wards providing specialized MNH services in these six institutions.

Study population and sampling

The study population consisted of mothers who had been discharged following a normal vaginal delivery. Mothers who had complications and the mothers with newborns who had complications following a normal delivery were excluded from the study as their care would deviate from the regular postnatal care, which was the focus of the study. A sample of 1300 mothers was deemed necessary to detect the significant associations of client perceptions.

Mothers were selected from all 17 wards. Number of mothers selected from each ward was proportionate to the number of NVDs in the first quarter of 2016 in that ward. Consecutive sampling technique was used to select eligible mothers in each ward.

Data collection

A thorough literature survey was conducted to identify a suitable instrument to assess client perceptions of institutional postnatal care in Sri Lanka. Though a number of instruments were available for assessment of client satisfaction, instruments assessing client perceived quality of postnatal care were scarce. The possibility of using the instrument used by van Duong et al., to evaluate the client perceived quality of maternity services in rural Vietnam [11] was assessed by an expert panel consisting of three public health specialists. According to the experts, several items in this instrument were not relevant to the institutional postnatal care provision in Sri Lanka. Therefore a new instrument - The Client Perceived Quality of Institutional Postnatal Care (CPQIPNC) questionnaire- was developed by the Principal Investigator (PI), for data collection. It had a total of 23 items divided into three domains: technical care and information, interpersonal care and ward facilities and cleanliness. Each item was rated on a five-point Likert scale, from one to five, and had five statements: “very poor”, “poor”, “neutral”, “good” and “very good”. The scores ranged from one for “very poor” ratings, to five for “very good” ratings. Therefore, the total obtainable score ranged from 23 to 115 (Additional file 1). It was validated by conducting an exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis and had an internal consistency and test retest reliability of 0.94 [18]. In addition, socio demographic information from the mother and information on receipt of services by the mother and the baby that are stipulated in the National guidelines on maternal care [19] were also collected using interviewer administered questionnaires (Additional files 2 and 3).

Interviews were conducted in a pre-identified place in the ward with adequate privacy after all the discharge procedures were completed for each selected mother. As discharges are done twice daily at 12 noon and at 5.00 pm, two interview sessions were done daily, approximately at these times.

Data collection was conducted by six trained pre-intern medical officers via an interviewer administered questionnaire after obtaining the informed written consent from the eligible mothers. Data collectors were supervised by the PI throughout the study and 2% of all questionnaires completed by each data collector was re-administered by the PI to ensure reliability of data collection. Inter-rater reliability was assessed by computing Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for data collectors’ results and PI’s results. The cut off was set at 0.7 [20]. The ICC obtained by data collectors ranged between 0.96–0.99, indicating a satisfactory inter-rater reliability.

Data analysis

Data analysis was conducted by SPSS version 21. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the basic information of the study sample, services received by them during the postnatal period and their perceived quality.

A binomial logistic regression analysis was carried out to determine the associations of client perceptions, as most of the statistical assumptions were met for binomial regression analysis.

The total score obtained by each participant for the CPQIPNC questionnaire was taken as the dependent variable and was dichotomized into low and high client perceived quality, based on the median value of the total score. Identification of the independent variables was accomplished by reviewing previous literature and expert opinion. The variables included socio demographic factors, pregnancy related factors, institutional factors and services received during the current hospital stay.

Information on independent variables were gathered during interviews of the mothers using questionnaires developed by the PI. They were transformed into categorical variables for further analysis. The independent variables to be included in the analysis were determined by a bivariate analysis. The variables with less than 10 counts in one category were excluded from the analysis. The significance level for selection was taken as p < 0.25 [21]. Using the variables selected, a backward stepwise binomial logistic regression was conducted to assess the significant correlates. Goodness of fit of the regression model was assessed by the regression diagnostics (overall percentage of the predictions that were correctly classified by observed outcomes, The Omnibus test, Cox and Snell Square test, Negelkerke R Square test, Hosmer and Lameshow test).

Necessary administrative clearances were obtained and the ethical clearance for the study was obtained from the ethics Review Committee, faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Sri Lanka.

Results

Of the selected mothers, 1265 responded to the questionnaire, giving a response rate of 97.3%. Response rate from individual wards ranged between 76.5–100%. Of the non-respondents, four did not consent for participation (0.3%) and another 31 mothers (2.4%) who consented, had left the hospital before the interview was initiated.

Socio demographic and pregnancy related details of the participants

Age ranged from 16 to 46 years, while most mothers belonged to the 20–35 years age group (n = 1074, 84.9%). More than three fourths have obtained an educational qualification above year 11 (n = 1029, 81.3%). A clear majority of the study sample (n = 958, 75.7%) was unemployed. Average monthly income showed a wide variation, ranging from Sri Lankan Rupees 3000.00 (17 USD) to 350,000.00 (2000 USD). Close to half of the study sample were primi mothers (n = 525, 41.5%) (Table 1).

Table 1 Distribution of the study participants by socio demographic characteristics

Mothers’ account on services received by them

Services recommended in the national guidelines to be delivered during the postnatal period following a NVD were received by most of the participants. Majority have initiated breast feeding within 1 h after delivery (n = 1184, 93.6%) as recommended, and 99.4% mothers have exclusively breast fed while in the postnatal ward. The technique of breast feeding has been assessed by a health care worker for majority of mothers (n = 1249, 98.7%) and corrected where necessary. Least frequently received service was the opportunity to practice kangaroo mother care (KMC) (n = 970, 76.7%).

Inquiry was made into the services provided to the mother and the newborn at discharge. All the mothers and 99.8% (n = 1263) of the babies have been examined by a medical officer at discharge, and over 95% of the examinees were informed about their examination findings (1235 participants were informed about their examination findings and 1256 were given information following examination of the baby). Privacy has been ensured during 99% of the examinations by covering the examination area (n = 1254).

All mothers have received health advices regarding the postnatal period. The main sources of information were nursing officers and midwives (n = 1195, 94.5% and n = 190, 86.2% respectively). Medical officers have provided health advices to only 750 mothers in the study sample (59.3%) (Table 2).

Table 2 Services received by the woman and the baby during the postnatal period

Client perceived quality of institutional postnatal care (CQIPNC)

The total obtainable score of CQIPNC ranged from 23 to 115. The obtainable scores for technical care and information domain, interpersonal care domain and ward facilities and cleanliness domain ranged between 9 - 45, 7–35, and 7–35 respectively.

The total score obtained for the CQIPNC questionnaire in the study ranged from 48 to 115. The median score obtained by the participants for the questionnaire was 108, which was 93.9% of the total obtainable score (IQR- 96-114). Technical care and information domain had a median score of 43 (IQR = 38–45). Interpersonal care domain and ward facilities and cleanliness domain had median scores of 33 (IQR = 30–35) and 32 (IQR = 28–35) respectively (Table 3).

Table 3 Median values for each domain of the CPQIPNC questionnaire (N = 1265)

Over 90% of the mothers have rated care as ‘good’ or ‘very good’ for all the items included in interpersonal care domain and the technical care and information domain. The ratings reduced somewhat for the items in the ward facilities and cleanliness domain. Only 81.1% have rated the cleanliness of the toilets in the ward as ‘good’ or ‘very good’. The ‘good’ or ‘very good’ ratings percentages for the space and the facilities available were 88.0 and 88.8% respectively (Table 4).

Table 4 Percentage of women who perceived each item in the CPQIPNC questionnaire as “good” or “very good” (N = 1265)

Determinants of client perceived quality of care

For this analysis, the scores obtained for the CPQIPNC were categorized into high perceived quality and low perceived quality, based on the median value obtained for the questionnaire. Thus scores below 108 were categorized as low perceived quality (n = 632), and scores equal to or above 108 were categorized as high perceived quality (n = 633). The bivariate analysis depicted that participant characteristics such as the age between 20 and 35 years (OR = 1.6, p = 0.06), husband’s occupation (OR = 1.2, p = 0.08), average monthly income (OR = 0.8, p = 0.13), the type of institution used by the mother (OR = 1.4, p = 0.004); services such as initiation of breast feeding within 1 h (2.2, p = 0.001), informing the mother after examination of the baby (OR = 1.9, p = 0.02), provision of adequate pain relief during episiotomy suture (OR = 2.2, P < 0.001), giving assistance to practice KMC in the labour room and the ward (OR = 1.4, p = 0.02), receiving health advices from doctors (OR = 2.6, p < 0.001) and midwives (OR = 3.2, p < 0.001), regular examination of the mother (OR = 2.0, p = 0.009), getting assistance to initiate breast feeding (OR = 1.9, p = 0.12) were significantly associated with high perceptions of quality of care.

Among these variables, only 20–35 age category (aOR = 1.8, p = 0.024), teaching and specialized hospitals category (1.6, p < 0.001), and services such as initiation of breast feeding within 1 h of delivery (2.1, p = 0.009), pain relief during suturing of the episiotomy (2.2, p < 0.001), Ability to practice KMC (1.4, p = 0.035), Receiving health advices by the doctors (2.1, p < 0.001) and PHMs (2.1, p < 0.001) were identified as significant correlates via the multivariate analysis (Table 5).

Table 5 Results of the logistic regression on factors associated with a positive maternal perception of quality of care received in the institutional postnatal period

The final model explains between 10.7% (Cox & Snell R square) to 14.3% (Negelkerke R Square) of the variation in the client perceived quality. The Omnibus test was statistically significant with a p value of less than 0.001. Hosmer and Lameshow test was not significant, indicating that the model was a good fit to the data. The final model of the binary logistic regression correctly classified 52.5% of client perceptions.

Discussion

Client perceptions of the care received by her or him is increasingly being considered a valid measure of quality of healthcare, despite the subjective nature of the measurement. It gives an immediate feedback to the provider on the services provided. Authorities can use these data in quality improvement processes to identify deficiencies in patient centered care [7].

To the best of authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to assess the client perceived quality of regular postnatal care services provided by public sector specialized institutions in Sri Lanka. This study discovered that mothers’ assessment of the quality of institutional postnatal care was favourable, as observed by the high median scores received for the questionnaire. It also identified that each item of care assessed by the questionnaire was rated favourably by most of the mothers.

Favourable ratings for client satisfaction and client perception surveys is a well-known phenomenon [22] and has been observed across the world [23,24,25]. A recent review of literature on women’s’ satisfaction with maternal care in developing countries has observed that majority of studies have reported a high level of satisfaction [24]. However, in several studies, clients have rated the quality of institutional maternal care as poor [26, 27] which have been attributed by some authors to poor quality of health delivery systems, client characteristics such as literacy level, cultural diversity, and techniques of assessment of satisfaction.

Client perceived quality is a multi-dimentional concept and is assessed through a number of related domains [28]. During the development of the CPQIPNC tool, three domains were identified, namely, technical care, interpersonal care and ward facilities. These domains have commonly been used to assess client perceptions with institutional care [11, 14]. Among them, “ward facilities and cleanliness” domain was rated less favourably than other two domains by the participant mothers. Items such as cleanliness of the toilets and washrooms, space in the postnatal ward and ability to get adequate rest have obtained lowest scores. Ward facilities and related domains have consistently obtained low scores in client perception and client satisfaction surveys. Wijesinghe [14] and Senerath [29] have also identified the same phenomenon in relation to intra-natal care in Sri Lanka. The same trend has been reported in international studies, where environmental attributes have been rated negatively in comparison to other attributes [28]. This reflects the relative low priority given to the physical environment of the wards by the authorities in general and mothers’ concern about it. A satisfying physical environment will reduce the maternal stress during the immediate postnatal period. Therefore this provides an important feedback to the authorities to ponder when improving care.

Further, attributes such as technical care and interpersonal care may also receive higher scores due to courtesy bias, where inanimate items such as that assessed by ward facilities domain may be rated more objectively, as suggested by studies assessing the biases associated with exit interviews [30, 31]. Further, in the current study, mothers have reported that most of the recommended services were provided to them, which may contribute to high ratings of technical care.

Assessment of determinants of client-perceived quality of care

Client perceptions may be influenced by many factors besides actual service delivery. Studies have shown that apart from structure, process and outcomes of care, factors such as client characteristics, access to services, financial costs, socio economic and cultural factors may shape the way clients perceive the services [24].

Logistic regression revealed that apart from age, other socio demographic factors were not associated with mothers’ perceptions of the quality of care. Similar findings have been reported by Kambala et al. [32], where socio demographic factors were found to be related to perceived quality of antenatal care but not delivery or postnatal care. Further, literature report that socio demographic associations of client perceptions are not consistent across studies. In addition, most of these associations are non-modifiable, limiting their value in improving care to meet patients’ expectations [33].

Awareness on service related and facility related factors that may influence mothers’ perceptions on the other hand, plays a major role in improving care. The current study found that certain services, such as initiation of breast feeding within 1 h of delivery, pain relief during suturing of the episiotomy, ability to practice KMC, receiving health advices by the doctors and midwives were associated with higher ratings of quality of care provided to mothers and the babies. These services may help to create a favourable opinion of the postnatal care in the mother, leading to high perceived quality.

Initiation of breast feeding and skin to skin care immediately after the delivery promotes the bonding between mother and the newborn has been known to improve the maternal perceptions and satisfaction with care [34, 35]. Practice of Kangaroo Mother Care also improves bonding through skin to skin care, leading to positive perceptions about quality of care.

Experience of intense pain during labour by the mother has constantly been associated with negative perceptions about labour [36]. Therefore, it is reasonable to expect that mothers who received adequate pain relief during suture of episiotomy would perceive care more positively compared to mothers who did not, as demonstrated by the current study.

Previous studies have reported that mothers expect to receive adequate information on important aspects such as breast feeding, child-care and behaviour during the postnatal period [37]. Positive perceptions of care by the mothers who receive information as expected is evident in many literature on maternal satisfaction [24]. Consistently, the current study revealed that while all mothers have received health advices from either midwives, nurses or doctors, those who received advices from doctors and midwives have perceived care more positively than who did not.

In addition to these services, mothers who received services from teaching and specialized hospitals have rated the quality more favourably than the mothers in the base hospitals. “Good physical environment and efficient management” has been stated as significant predictors of positive assessment of care by mothers [24]. Teaching hospitals and specialized hospitals have better facilities and resources than base hospitals and is capable of better management and care than base hospitals. This is consistent with literature that higher-level institutions are associated with more positive maternal perceptions of care, possibly due to better facilities [28].

Limitations of the study

Our study had following limitations. Firstly, it assessed the perceptions of the mothers who attend specialized institutions only. The perceptions of the mothers who attend non-specialized institutions may be quite different to these findings. Secondly the effect of courtesy bias that is introduced when information is collected through exit interviews may have led to an over estimation of the results. However, use of interviewers who were not involved in patient care and ensuring privacy during the interviews were aimed to overcome this issue.

Conclusions and recommendations

This study presents a cross sectional depiction of postnatal mothers’ perceptions of the care received by them. According to the postnatal mothers’ perceptions, the quality of institutional postnatal care in specialized institutions in Colombo district of Sri Lanka is commendable. However, the ward facilities and environment domain has obtained lower ratings compared to technical and interpersonal care domains. Services such as initiation of breast feeding immediately following delivery, practice of KMC in the ward, getting health advices from doctors or midwives and provision of adequate pain relief during episiotomy suture, and obtaining services from higher level institutions were associated with positive client perceptions. These findings will be useful for quality improvement, and to provide more patient centred care. However, quality assessment should be a regular process which should be an integral component of health care delivery systems. Therefore, it is recommended that this assessment is conducted regularly to get the most updated feedback.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on request.

Abbreviations

aOR:

Adjusted Odds Ratio

CPQIPNC:

Client Perceived Quality of Institutional Postnatal Care

HCW:

Health care worker

ICC:

Intra-class Correlation Coefficient

IQR:

Inter Quartile Range

KMC:

Kangaroo mother care

MNH:

Maternal and Newborn Health

NVD:

Normal vaginal delivery

OR:

Odds Ratio

PI:

Principal Investigator

SPSS:

Statistical Package for the Social Sciences

USD:

United States Dollars

References

  1. 1.

    Ronsmans C, Graham WJ. Maternal mortality: who, when, where, and why. Lancet. 2006;368(9542):1189–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    World Health Organization. Essential newborn care course: clinical practise workbook. 2010; Available from: http://www.who.int/maternal_child_adolescent/documents/newborncare_course/en/

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Stanton CK, Rawlins B, Drake M, dos Anjos M, Cantor D, Chongo L, et al. Measuring coverage in MNCH: testing the validity of women’s self-report of key maternal and newborn health interventions during the peripartum period in Mozambique. PLoS One. 2013;8(5):e60694.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    World Health Organization. Quality of care: a process for making strategic choices in health systems, vol. 267. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006. p. 1–50.

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    World Health Organization. Newborns: reducing mortality: WHO. World Health Organization; 2016. Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs333/en/. Cited 10 May 2016

  6. 6.

    Hulton AL, Matthews Z, Stones RW. A framework for quality of care in maternity services. Southampton: University of Southampton; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Castle NG, Brown J, Hepner KA, Hays RD. Review of the literature on survey instruments used to collect data on hospital patients’ perceptions of care. Health Serv Res. 2005;40(6 II):1996–2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Vuori H. Patient satisfaction--an attribute or indicator of the quality of care? Qual Rev Bull. 1987;13:106–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Williams B. Patient satisfaction: a valid concept? Soc Sci Med. 1994;38(4):509–16.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Andaleeb SS. Service quality perceptions and patient satisfaction: a study of hospitals in a developing country. Soc Sci Med. 2001;52(9):1359–70 Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953600002355.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    van Duong D, Binns CW, Lee AH, Hipgrave DB. Measuring client-perceived quality of maternity services in rural Vietnam. Int J Qual Heal Care. 2004;16(6):447–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Medical Statistics Unit. Annual health bulletin 2014. Colombo: Ministry of Health, Nutrition and Indigenous Medicine; 2016. p. 203.

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Prathapan S. Quality of field antenatal clinics in Colombo District. Sri Lanka: Post Graduate Institute of Colombo; 2009.

  14. 14.

    Wijesinghe SD. Client perceived quality of antenatal and intranatal care and its association with service utilization. Colombo: Post Graduate Institute of Medicine; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Department of Census and Statistics. Census of population and housing. Colombo: Department of Census and Statistics; 2015.

  16. 16.

    Family Health Bureau. Annual report 2014. Colombo: Ministry of Health, Nutrition and Indigenous Medicine; 2015.

  17. 17.

    Family Health Bureau. National emergency obstetric and neonatal care needs assessment. Colombo: Ministry of Health, Nutrition and Indigenous Medicine; 2012.

  18. 18.

    Wickramasinghe S, Gunathunga M, Hemachandra N. Validation of a newly developed multi-dimensional instrument to assess maternal perceptions of the quality of institutional postnatal care services in Sri Lanka. J Coll Commun Physicians Sri Lanka. 2019;29(25):65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Ministry of Health. National guidelines for maternal care, vol. I. Colombo: Family Health Bureau; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Litwin M. How to measure survey reliability and validity. Newyork: Sage Publications; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Teijlingen ER, Hundley V, Rennie A, Graham W, Fitzmaurice A. Maternity satisfaction studies and their limitations:“what is, must still be best”. Birth. 2003;30:75–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Jha P, Larsson M, Christensson K, Svanberg AS. Satisfaction with childbirth services provided in public health facilities: results from a cross-sectional survey among postnatal women in Chhattisgarh, India. Glob Health Action. 2017;10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2017.1386932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Srivastava A, Avan B, Rajbangshi P, Bhattacharyya S. Determinants of women’s satisfaction with maternal health care_ a review of literature. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Wiegers TA. The quality of maternity care services as experienced by women in the Netherlands. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009;9:18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Karkee R, Lee AH, Pokharel PK. Women’s perception of quality of maternity services: a longitudinal survey in Nepal. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14(1):1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Gashaye KT, Tsegaye AT, Shiferaw G, Worku AG, Abebe SM. Client satisfaction with existing labor and delivery care and associated factors among mothers who gave birth in university of Gondar teaching hospital; Northwest Ethiopia: institution based cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2019;14(2):1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Matejić B, Milićević MŠ, Vasić V, Djikanović B. Maternal satisfaction with organized perinatal care in Serbian public hospitals. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14(1):1–9 Available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/14/14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Senerath LDJU. Essential newborn care services in a District of Sri Lanka and the effectiveness of an intervention to improve services. Colombo: Post Graduate Institute of Medicine; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Glick P. How reliable are surveys of client satisfaction with healthcare services? Evidence from matched facility and household data in Madagascar. Soc Sci Med. 2009;68:368–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Hameed W, Ishaque M, Gul X, Siddiqui J-R, Hussain S, Hussain W, et al. Does courtesy bias affect how clients report on objective and subjective measures of family planning service quality? A comparison between facility- and home-based interviews. Open Access J Contracept. 2018;9:33–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Kambala C, Lohmann J, Mazalale J, Brenner S, De Allegri M, Muula AS, et al. How do Malawian women rate the quality of maternal and newborn care? Experiences and perceptions of women in the central and southern regions. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15(1):1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0560-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Al-Abri R, Al-Balushi A. Patient satisfaction survey as a tool towards quality improvement. Oman Med J. 2014;29(1):3–7 Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24501659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Zeyneloğlu S, Kısa S, Özberk H, Badem A. Predictors and measurement of satisfaction with postpartum care in a government hospital. Nurs Health Sci. 2017;19(2):198–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Sundin CS, Mazac LB. Implementing skin-to-skin care in the operating room after cesarean birth. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2015;40(4):249–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Oweis A. Jordanian mother’s report of their childbirth experience: findings from a questionnaire survey. Int J Nurs Pract. 2009;15(6):525–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Lindberg I, Ohrling K, Christensson K. Expectations of post-partum care among pregnant women living in the north of Sweden. Int J Circumpolar Health. 2008;67(5):472–83 Available from: http://www.circumpolarhealthjournal.net/index.php/ijch/article/view/18354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Dr. S. J. Senanayake for his generous contribution in finalizing the manuscript.

Funding

No funding was obtained for this study.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

DKNNH – Proposed and developed the concept of the study; provided technical inputs in relation to maternal and newborn care during the design phase; provided guidance to interpret analyzed data; revised the drafted manuscript. MWG- Contributed by providing technical inputs to develop a sound methodology during the design phase; was involved in interpretation of analyzed data; carried out substantial revisions of the drafted manuscript. SAW - Designed the study with the inputs from DKNNH and MWG; oversaw the data collection and carried out the analysis and interpretation of data along with other authors; prepared the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript and the subsequent revisions, and have agreed to be accountable for their own contributions in the work as well as the entire work.

Authors’ information

SAW is a public health professional in Sri Lanka who has recently completed her MD in Community Medicine.

MWG is a Professor in Community Medicine, Attached to the Community Medicine Department of University of Colombo, Sri Lanka.

NH is a senior public health professional who is also the current World Health Organization Regional Officer for Eastern Mediterranean Region.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sashimali Anuradha Wickramasinghe.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The ethical clearance for the study was obtained from the Ethics Review Committee, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Sri Lanka.

Informed written consent was obtained from all the participants prior to participation.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1.

Tool to assess client perceived quality of institutional postnatal care- CPQIPNC Questionnaire.

Additional file 2.

Questionnaire to assess socio-demographic details of the mothers.

Additional file 3.

Checklist to assess the provision of regular postnatal care following normal vaginal delivery.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wickramasinghe, S.A., Gunathunga, M.W. & Hemachandra, D.K.N.N. Client perceived quality of the postnatal care provided by public sector specialized care institutions following a normal vaginal delivery in Sri Lanka: a cross sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 19, 485 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2645-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Client perceptions
  • Postnatal care
  • Quality of care
  • Client perceived care
  • Institutional postnatal care