Mercer RT. Becoming a mother versus maternal role attainment. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2004;36:226–32.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
May KA. Three phases of father involvement in pregnancy. Nurs Res. 1982;31:337–42.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Habib C, Lancaster S. Changes in identity and paternal–foetal attachment across a first pregnancy. J. Reprod. Infant Psychol. 2010;28:128–42.
Article
Google Scholar
Genesoni L, Tallandini MA. Men’s psychological transition to fatherhood: an analysis of the literature, 1989-2008. Birth Berkeley Calif. 2009;36:305–18.
Article
Google Scholar
Wells MB. Literature review shows that fathers are still not receiving the support they want and need from Swedish child health professionals. Acta Paediatr. 2016;105:1014–23.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Campbell S. A short history of sonography in obstetrics and gynaecology. Facts Views Vis ObGyn. 2013;5:213–29.
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Draper J. “It”s the first scientific evidence’: men’s experience of pregnancy confirmation. J Adv Nurs. 2002;39:563–70.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Ekelin M, Crang-Svalenius E, Dykes A-K. A qualitative study of mothers’ and fathers’ experiences of routine ultrasound examination in Sweden. Midwifery. 2004;20:335–44.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Widarsson M, Engström G, Tydén T, Lundberg P, Hammar LM. “Paddling upstream”: fathers’ involvement during pregnancy as described by expectant fathers and mothers. J Clin Nurs. 2015;24:1059–68.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Åhman A, Runestam K, Sarkadi A. Did I really want to know this? Pregnant women’s reaction to detection of a soft marker during ultrasound screening. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;81:87–93.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Garcia J, Bricker L, Henderson J, Martin M-A, Mugford M, Nielson J, et al. Women’s views of pregnancy ultrasound: a systematic review. Birth. 2002;29:225–50.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Åhman A, Lindgren P, Sarkadi A. Facts first, then reaction—expectant fathers’ experiences of an ultrasound screening identifying soft markers. Midwifery. 2012;28:e667–75.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Lalor J, Begley CM, Galavan E. Recasting hope: a process of adaptation following fetal anomaly diagnosis. Soc Sci Med. 2009;68:462–72.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Lalor JG, Devane D, Begley CM. Unexpected diagnosis of fetal abnormality: women’s encounters with caregivers. Birth. 2007;34:80–8.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
McCoyd JLM. What do women want? Experiences and reflections of women after prenatal diagnosis and termination for anomaly. Health Care Women Int. 2009;30:507–35.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Sandelowski M, Barroso J. The travesty of choosing after positive prenatal diagnosis. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2005;34:307–18.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Dolk H, Loane M, Garne E. The prevalence of congenital anomalies in Europe. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2010;686:349–64.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Allan LD, Huggon IC. Counselling following a diagnosis of congenital heart disease. Prenat Diagn. 2004;24:1136–42.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Warnes CA. The adult with congenital heart disease: born to be bad? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:1–8.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Wool C. Systematic review of the literature: parental outcomes after diagnosis of fetal anomaly. Adv. Neonatal Care. 2011;11:182–92.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
McKechnie AC, Pridham K. Preparing heart and mind following prenatal diagnosis of complex congenital heart defect. Qual Health Res. 2012;22:1694–706.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Asplin N, Wessel H, Marions L, Georgsson Öhman S. Pregnant women’s perspectives on decision-making when a fetal malformation is detected by ultrasound examination. Sex. Reprod. Healthc. 2013;4:79–84.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Carlsson T, Bergman G, Wadensten B, Mattsson E. Experiences of informational needs and received information following a prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart defect. Prenat Diagn. 2016;36:515–22.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Chenni N, Lacroze V, Pouet C, Fraisse A, Kreitmann B, Gamerre M, et al. Fetal heart disease and interruption of pregnancy: factors influencing the parental decision-making process. Prenat Diagn. 2012;32:168–72.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Howe D. Ethics of prenatal ultrasound. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;28:443–51.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Carlsson T, Bergman G, Karlsson AM, Wadensten B, Mattsson E. Experiences of termination of pregnancy for a fetal anomaly: A qualitative study of virtual community messages. Midwifery. 2016;41:54–60.
Tararbit K, Bui TTT, Lelong N, Thieulin A-C, Goffinet F, Khoshnood B. Clinical and socioeconomic predictors of pregnancy termination for fetuses with congenital heart defects: a population-based evaluation. Prenat Diagn. 2013;33:179–86.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Carlsson T, Bergman G, Melander Marttala U, Wadensten B, Mattsson E. Information following a diagnosis of congenital heart defect: experiences among parents to prenatally diagnosed children. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0117995.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Heba H. Women’s long-term life experience after pregnancy termination for fetal abnormality: interpretive phenomenological study. Ontario: Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository; 2015.
Google Scholar
Fonseca A, Nazaré B, Canavarro MC. Parental psychological distress and quality of life after a prenatal or postnatal diagnosis of congenital anomaly: a controlled comparison study with parents of healthy infants. Disabil Health J. 2012;5:67–74.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Kaasen A, Helbig A, Malt UF, Naes T, Skari H, Haugen GN. Paternal psychological response after ultrasonographic detection of structural fetal anomalies with a comparison to maternal response: a cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:147.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Korenromp MJ, GCML P-C, van den Bout J, EJH M, JAM H, CMA P, et al. A prospective study on parental coping 4 months after termination of pregnancy for fetal anomalies. Prenat Diagn. 2007;27:709–16.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Korenromp MJ, Page-Christiaens GCML, van den Bout J, Mulder EJH, Hunfeld JAM, Bilardo CM, et al. Psychological consequences of termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly: similarities and differences between partners. Prenat Diagn. 2005;25:1226–33.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
McKechnie AC, Pridham K, Tluczek A. Preparing heart and mind for becoming a parent following a diagnosis of fetal anomaly. Qual Health Res. 2015;25:1182–98.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Fonseca A, Nazaré B, Canavarro MC. Patterns of parental emotional reactions after a pre- or postnatal diagnosis of a congenital anomaly. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2011;29:320–33.
Article
Google Scholar
Locock L, Alexander J. “Just a bystander”? Men’s place in the process of fetal screening and diagnosis. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62:1349–59.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Sandelowski M. Whatever happened to qualitative description? Res. Nurs. Health. 2000;23:334–40.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
The National Board of Health and Welfare. Statistics on induced abortions 2014. 2015 [cited 2016 Feb 8]. Available from: https://www.socialstyrelsen.se/Lists/Artikelkatalog/Attachments/19915/2015-9-4.pdf
Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24:105–12.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Elo S, Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62:107–15.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Dheensa S, Metcalfe A, Williams RA. Men’s experiences of antenatal screening: a metasynthesis of the qualitative research. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013;50:121–33.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Kersting A, Wagner B. Complicated grief after perinatal loss. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2012;14:187–94.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Korenromp MJ, Page-Christiaens GCML, van den Bout J, Mulder EJH, Visser GHA. Adjustment to termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly: a longitudinal study in women at 4, 8, and 16 months. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201:160.e1–7.
Article
Google Scholar
Zhang B, El-Jawahri A, Prigerson HG. Update on bereavement research: evidence-based guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of complicated bereavement. J Palliat Med. 2006;9:1188–203.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Asplin N, Wessel H, Marions L, Georgsson Öhman S. Pregnancy termination due to fetal anomaly: women’s reactions, satisfaction and experiences of care. Midwifery. 2014;30:620–7.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Asplin N, Wessel H, Marions L, Georgsson ÖS. Pregnant women’s experiences, needs, and preferences regarding information about malformations detected by ultrasound scan. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2012;3:73–8.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Moore T, Parrish H, Black BP. Interconception care for couples after perinatal loss: a comprehensive review of the literature. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2011;25:44–51.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Bratt E-L, Järvholm S, Ekman-Joelsson B-M, Mattson L-Å, Mellander M. Parent’s experiences of counselling and their need for support following a prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease - a qualitative study in a Swedish context. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:171.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Hedrick J. The lived experience of pregnancy while carrying a child with a known, nonlethal congenital abnormality. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2005;34:732–40.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Fonseca A, Nazaré B, Canavarro MC. Clinical determinants of parents’ emotional reactions to the disclosure of a diagnosis of congenital anomaly. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2013;42:178–90.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Askelsdóttir B, Conroy S, Rempel G. From diagnosis to birth: parents’ experience when expecting a child with congenital anomaly. Adv Neonatal Care. 2008;8:348–54.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Patton MQ. Qualitative research & evaluation methods. 3rd ed. London: Sage publications; 2002.
Google Scholar
Kavanaugh K, Ayres L. “Not as bad as it could have been”: assessing and mitigating harm during research interviews on sensitive topics. Res. Nurs. Health. 1998;21:91–7.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Novick G. Is there a bias against telephone interviews in qualitative research? Res Nurs Health. 2008;31:391–8.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Opdenakker R. Advantages and disadvantages of four interview techniques in qualitative research. Forum Qual Soc Res. 2006;7:11.
Google Scholar
Sturges JE, Hanrahan KJ. Comparing telephone and face-to-face qualitative interviewing: a research note. Qual Res. 2004;4:107–18.
Article
Google Scholar