Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Fetal heart rate abnormalities during and after external cephalic version: Which fetuses are at risk and how are they delivered?

  • 1Email author,
  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 1 and
  • 1
BMC Pregnancy and ChildbirthBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:363

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1547-6

  • Received: 14 September 2016
  • Accepted: 9 October 2017
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Fetal heart rate abnormalities (FHR) during and after external cephalic version (ECV) are relatively frequent. They may raise concern about fetal wellbeing. Only occasionally they may lead to an emergency cesarean section.

Methods

Prospective cohort study in 980 women (> 34 weeks gestation) with a singleton fetus in breech presentation. During and after external cephalic version (ECV) FHR abnormalities were recorded. Obstetric variables and delivery outcome were evaluated. Primary outcome was to identify which fetuses are at risk for FHR abnormalities. Secondary outcome was to identify a possible relationship between FHR abnormalities during and after ECV and mode of delivery and fetal distress during subsequent labor.

Results

The overall success rate of ECV was 60% and in 9% of the attempts there was an abnormal FHR pattern. In two cases FHR abnormalities after ECV led to an emergency CS. Estimated fetal weight per 100 g (OR 0.90, CI: 0.87–0.94) and longer duration of the ECV-procedure (OR 1.13, CI: 1.05–1.21) were factors significantly associated with the occurrence of FHR abnormalities. FHR abnormalities were not associated with the mode of delivery or the occurrence of fetal distress during subsequent labor.

Conclusions

FHR abnormalities during and after ECV are more frequent with lower estimated fetal weight and longer duration of the procedure. FHR abnormalities during and after ECV have no consequences for subsequent mode of delivery. They do not predict whether fetal distress will occur during labor.

Trial registration

The Eindhoven Breech Intervention Study, NCT00516555. Date of registration: August 13, 2007.

Keywords

  • Pregnancy
  • Breech presentation
  • External cephalic version
  • Fetal heart rate
  • Fetal distress
  • Mode of delivery

Background

External cephalic version (ECV) is the preferred method for reducing breech presentations at labor [1, 2]. Unfortunately, ECV is not without risks, which may lead to concerns about the wellbeing of the unborn child [35].

Complications such as vaginal bleeding, placental abruption, preterm rupture of membranes and fetal distress may occur, but they are rare. In less than 4 out of 1000 women this may lead to an emergency cesarean section (CS) [6].

More frequently reported are transient abnormal fetal heart rate (FHR) patterns, which happen in approximately 5% of the cases. These patterns of FHR abnormalities include bradycardias, nonreactive non-stress test, tachycardias and other unspecified patterns [610].

Various mechanisms have been proposed to account for these FHR abnormalities such as compression of the umbilical cord or vagal nerve mediated bradycardia (due to direct pressure on the fetus) [8]. Measurement of the umbilical and middle cerebral arterial blood flow support this hypothesis as the application of pressure on the fetal head first decreases blood flow followed by an increase after ECV [11, 12]. These events also may occur during labor.

Another explanation postulated is temporary hypoxia caused by relatively decreased utero-placental blood flow on the basis of increased intrauterine pressure during the procedure [8].

Consequently an increase in cell-free fetal DNA in the maternal circulation was recorded after ECV [13].

Which fetuses are at risk for transient abnormal FHR patterns? And how is the stress of labor tolerated by this group? A study from Lau et al. in 425 women showed that a difficult or successful ECV-procedure and nulliparity are factors predisposing for the occurrence of transient fetal bradycardia [14]. Furthermore, they showed that these fetuses have a higher risk of intrapartum CS because of fetal distress.

We recorded FHR during and after ECV and analyzed the data of almost 1000 women.

Primary outcome was to identify which fetuses are at risk for FHR abnormalities during and after ECV. Secondary outcome was to identify a possible relationship between FHR abnormalities during and after ECV and the occurrence of fetal distress during labor and mode of delivery.

Methods

Study design

A prospective observational cohort study was conducted between October 2007 and June 2012 in the Catharina Hospital in Eindhoven, The Netherlands. The study was approved by the Medical Ethical Committee of the Catharina Hospital. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

ECV intervention

The Obstetric Department of the Catharina Hospital has extensive experience in ECV. All ECV procedures during the study period were performed by the same four trained operators of whom two obstetricians and two midwifes. Since we prefer a filled bladder, women with an empty bladder were advised to drink before the procedure.

The hands of one staff member concentrated on the breech, while the hands of the other staff member concentrated on the fetal head. In order to prevent excessive pressure on the fetus, the manipulation between the pair of hands was rather consecutive than simultaneous. ‘Forward somersault’ was the preferred method to achieve cephalic position, and a ‘backward flip’ was an alternative strategy for nulliparous women with a frank breech presentation [15].

Before ECV, ultrasound was used to determine fetal position, estimated fetal weight (EFW), placental localization and amniotic fluid index (AFI). A tocolytic agent (Atosiban, 6.75 mg intravenously) was used in all ECV attempts.

Before and after each ECV procedure the fetal heart rate was monitored by cardiotocography (CTG). During the ECV procedure itself an assistant was monitoring the FHR by ongoing ultrasound.

Participants

Pregnant women who underwent ECV for breech presentation were included. Exclusion criteria were maternal age under 18 years, gestational age less than 34 weeks, a history of CS, no mastery of the Dutch language and contraindications for ECV.

Assessments

Before ECV, several obstetric factors were documented by the operators: maternal age (years), parity (primi- or multiparous), gestational age at ECV (weeks and days), type of breech (frank versus non-frank), placental localization (anterior versus non-anterior), AFI (≤10 or >10 cm), engagement of the fetal breech (above or in pelvic inlet), palpability of the fetal head (yes or no), fundal height (in cm) and EFW by ultrasound (in gram). Engagement of the fetal breech was a subjective assessment measured by the obstetricians and the midwife who performed the ECV.

During ECV, ultrasound was used to monitor fetal position and FHR. Episodes of fetal bradycardia were recorded. In all patients the number and total duration of the ECV attempts were recorded (in minutes). After ECV, the FHR was recorded by CTG for at least 60 min and abnormalities such as decelerations, bradycardia (as a FHR below 110 bpm) or tachycardia (as FHR above 170 bpm) were registered.

After delivery, characteristics of the delivery in cephalic presenting labors were recorded (spontaneous vaginal delivery, assisted vaginal delivery or CS), fetal gender (male or female), birth weight (in grams) and the presence of fetal distress during labor (yes or no).

Primary outcome was to identify which fetuses are at risk for FHR abnormalities during and after ECV. Secondary outcome was to identify a possible relationship between FHR abnormalities during and after ECV and the occurrence of fetal distress during subsequent labor.

Data analysis and processing

The mean and standard deviation, median and range or numbers of patients were estimated for each baseline characteristic. All characteristics were shown separately for cases with or without FHR abnormalities. Differences between groups for normally distributed variables were estimated with a t-test and for skewed variables with a Mann-Whitney test. Univariate logistic regression was used to select variables significantly associated with FHR abnormalities (dependent variable; odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI)). Subsequently, we evaluated the significant variables (P < 0.05) from the univariate analysis in a multivariate logistic regression model.

A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Because fundal height, EFW and birth weight are highly correlated, only EFW was put into the multivariate logistic regression model.

Finally, a possible relation between FHR abnormalities (during and after ECV) with fetal distress and mode of delivery was studied with a Chi-square test. Statistical analysis was carried out using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences for Windows 23.0 (SPSS).

Results

In total 980 ECV procedures were analyzed (Table 1) and in almost two thirds of the cases, these were primiparous women, n = 626 (64%).
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of 980 patients who underwent ECV between October 2007 and June 2012

 

Total (n = 980)

CTG-abnormalities during or after ECV (n = 86)

No CTG-abnormalities during or after ECV (n = 894)

P-value

Maternal age (years)

 Mean, standard deviation

31.2 (4.1)

31.2 (3.7)

31.3 (4.2)

0.9

 Range

17–46

21–40

17–46

 

Parity

 Primiparous

626 (64%)

59 (69%)

567 (63%)

0.3

 Multiparous

354 (36%)

27 (31%)

327 (37%)

 

Gestational age at ECV (weeks and days)

 Median

35 + 6

36 + 0

35 + 6

0.4

 Range

34 + 0–41 + 5

34 + 0–38 + 0

34 + 2–41 + 5

 

Type of breech

 Non-Frank

323 (34%)

26 (30%)

297 (34%)

0.5

 Frank

630 (66%)

60 (70%)

570 (66%)

 

Estimated Fetal Weight (EFW in grams)

 Mean, standard deviation

2591 (316)

2505 (276)

2599 (319)

0.009

 Range

1700–4000

1880–3526

1700–4000

 

Fundal height (centimeters)

 Mean, standard deviation

32.8 (1.7)

32.2 (1.2)

32.8 (1.7)

0.01

 Range

26–40

29–35

26–40

 

Engagement

 Breech above pelvic inlet

481 (50%)

35 (41%)

446 (51%)

0.08

 Breech in pelvic inlet

485 (50%)

51 (59%)

434 (49%)

 

Head palpable

 No

64 (7%)

4 (5%)

60 (7%)

0.5

 Yes

912 (93%)

82 (95%)

830 (93%)

 

Placenta location

 Posterior/lateral

582 (60%)

55 (65%)

527 (59%)

0.3

 Anterior

394 (40%)

30 (35%)

364 (41%)

 

Amniotic Fluid Index (AFI in cm)

 > 10

392 (40%)

25 (29%)

367 (41%)

0.03

 ≤ 10

586 (60%)

61 (71%)

525 (59%)

 

Duration ECV (in minutes)

 Median

2.50

4.15

2.45

< 0.001

 Range

0.15–16.05

0.30–16.05

0.15–15.45

 

Number of ECV attempts

 Mean, standard deviation

2.2 (1.4)

2.3 (1.4)

2.2 (1.4)

0.5

 Range

1–7

1–6

1–7

 

ECV success

 Yes

584 (60%)

55 (64%)

529 (59%)

0.4

 No

396 (40%)

31 (36%)

365 (41%)

 

Delivery mode

 Spontaneous vaginal

494 (50%)

48 (56%)

446 (50%)

0.3

 Assisted vaginal and caesarean section

486 (50%)

38 (44%)

448 (50%)

 

Gender newborn

 Boy

440 (45%)

40 (48%)

400 (45%)

0.6

 Girl

537 (55%)

44 (52%)

493 (55%)

 

Birth weight (grams)

 Median

3322

3201

3325

0.009

 Range

1700–4705

1782–4280

1700–4705

 

Mean gestational age at the moment of the ECV was 35 weeks +6 days (range from 34 weeks to 41 weeks and 5 days). More fetuses were in frank breech position (n = 630, 66%) than in non-frank (n = 323, 34%). In half of the cases, the breech was in the pelvic inlet. Median duration of the total ECV was 2.50 min (range from 0.15 to 16.05 min), with a mean number of 2.2 (± 1.4) attempts per procedure.

ECV was successful in 584 (60%) of the procedures. In 86 (9%) of the procedures a FHR abnormality occurred during the ECV.

Lower estimated fetal weight on ultrasound (mean 2505 versus 2599 g; p = 0.009), less fundal height (mean 32.2 versus 32.8 cm; p = 0.01), longer duration of the ECV procedure (median 4.15 versus 2.45 min; p < 0.001), lower AFI ≤ 10 cm (29% versus 41%; p = 0.03) and lower neonatal birth weight (mean 3201 versus 3325 g; p = 0.009) were risk factors significantly associated with the occurrence of FHR abnormalities.

Multivariate analysis (Table 2) shows that FHR abnormalities were associated with longer duration of ECV (OR 1.13, CI: 1.05–1.21; p < 0.001) and with lower EFW per 100 g (OR 0.90, CI: 0.87–0.94; p = 0.01).
Table 2

Odds ratios (OR) for fetal heart rate abnormalities during and after ECV

 

Univariate

Multivariate

Variable

O.R.

95% C.I.

O.R.

95% C.I.

Maternal age (years)

1.00

0.94–1.05

  

Gestational age at ECV (weeks and days)

1.02

0.80–1.30

  

Nulliparity

0.79

0.49–1.28

  

Engagement of breech

1.50

0.96–2.35

  

Frank breech

1.20

0.74–1.95

  

Amniotic fluid index ≤ 10 cm

1.71

1.05–2.77

1.57

0.95–2.58

Placenta anterior

0.79

0.50–1.26

  

Duration of ECV (minutes)

1.14

1.07–1.22

1.13

1.05–1.21

ECV success

0.82

0.52–1.29

  

Estimated fetal weight (per 100 g)

0.90

0.87–0.94

0.90

0.87–0.94

In two cases FHR abnormalities after ECV led to an emergency CS.

The first case was a 31-year old multiparous woman, G4P2 with gestational age of 35 weeks +5 days. She had two previous vaginal deliveries and one spontaneous abortion. After a successful ECV procedure there was a fetal bradycardia (90 beats per minute) during 10 min followed by tachycardia and decelerations. An emergency cesarean section was performed and after 25 min a female fetus, 2230 g in cephalic position was born with Apgar scores 9 after 1 min, 10 after 5 min and normal umbilical cord blood gas analysis. The second case was a 32-year old primiparous woman with gestational age 37 weeks. After a non-successful ECV procedure there was a fetal bradycardia of 80 beats per minute. No clinical signs of placental abruption were present. An emergency CS was performed and after 20 min a male fetus with a weight of 2540 g was born with low Apgar scores of 3 after 1 min and 8 after 5 min. Umbilical artery blood gas analysis showed a pH of 6.92 with base excess of −7/9 mmol/l. Neonatal recovery was uneventful. In both cases no explanation for the fetal distress was found (no signs of placental abruption or fetal maternal hemorrhage). Both cases were excluded from analysis.

FHR abnormalities during and after successful ECV occurred in 9% of women (n = 55). As illustrated in Fig. 1, mode of delivery (spontaneous, instrumental or CS) was similar between women with or without FHR during and after successful ECV. Moreover, the occurrence of fetal distress during subsequent labor between these two groups was also similar.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Labor outcome after successful ECV in 584 patients and the occurrence of fetal distress

Discussion

Factors associated with FHR abnormalities during and after ECV are estimated fetal weight (EFW) and the duration of the ECV-attempt.

FHR abnormalities during and after ECV are not associated with fetal distress during labor or mode of delivery.

In our study 9% of the ECV’s were complicated by FHR abnormalities. In the literature abnormal CTG findings are reported up to 5.7% [7]. Because the FHR was checked both during and after ECV, we found a higher number (9%) of FHR abnormalities.

Various mechanisms have been proposed to account for FHR abnormalities such as temporary hypoxemia caused by decreased utero-placental bloodflow [8]. Since placental reserve is less in small for gestational age fetuses, they may be more prone to FHR abnormalities because of hypoxemia. In the literature this is confirmed by measurements of the pre-ECV mean cerebral artery pulsatility index which shows an association between a non-reassuring fetal status after ECV and brain-sparing effects in the mildly compromised growth retarded fetus [16].

Duration of the ECV was also associated with FHR abnormalities during and after ECV. Because longer duration of the ECV may eventually cause disturbances at the uteroplacental unit, this may lead to FHR abnormalities after ECV [17].

Furthermore, direct pressure on the fetus can also cause vagal nerve compression and hence lead to FHR abnormalities [8]. Since we did not measure exerted force during ECV, we could not account for this variable. Studies in which the exerted force during ECV was measured using pressure-sensing gloves show that the greater the force applied, the more severe the reduction of blood flow in middle cerebral artery and umbilical artery. But no correlation was found between FHR and the applied force [12, 17]. Nevertheless, duration as well as force used during ECV should be limited.

Since more pressure is needed when there is a more intense uterine and abdominal muscle tone or engagement of the breech, ECV was accompanied with more FHR abnormalities in nulliparous women in the study by Lau et al. [14]. However, we could not confirm this finding.

It has been postulated that FHR abnormalities during ECV could imply that the fetus is more prone to stress during labor. However, in our study the risk of fetal distress during labor was the same in the groups with or without FHR abnormalities during and after successful ECV. Moreover, their mothers were not at risk for CS and instrumental vaginal delivery. This is in contradiction with a study from Leung who demonstrated that fetuses presenting with transient bradycardia post-ECV had a two-fold increased risk of intrapartum CS for non-reassuring fetal status.

A major strength of the current study is its large sample size and the fact that ECV was performed in one obstetric department by a small team of trained experts following the same protocol. The ratio between nulliparous and parous women at the ECV outpatient clinic in this study is in line with the incidence in the general population suggesting that the sample is representative with regard to an important determinant of ECV outcome: parity.

Furthermore, all data were prospectively recorded. Recording of the duration of the ECV was carefully obtained under supervision of an unbiased research nurse who accompanied all ECV procedures.

FHR abnormalities during and after ECV are relatively frequent (9%). In 2 cases (0.2%) ECV led to FHR abnormalities requiring emergency CS. This is in line with the literature [6, 7].

In our opinion, this small risk of emergency CS doesn’t justify a policy of overnight fasting. Therefore, we advise women with an empty bladder to drink before the procedure. This helps to lift the breech out of the pelvic inlet.

FHR changes following ECV appear to represent only a transient response to the procedure [9]. However duration as well as force of manipulation should be limited. Bradycardia up to 5 min is regarded as not harmful. [14] In the event of fetal bradycardia, the ECV should be discontinued until a normal pattern returns.

Conclusion

FHR abnormalities during and after ECV are more frequent with lower estimated fetal weight and longer duration of the procedure. FHR abnormalities during and after ECV have no consequences for subsequent mode of delivery. They do not predict whether fetal distress will occur during labor.

Abbreviations

AFI: 

Amniotic fluid index

BPM: 

Beats per minute

cm: 

Centimeters

CS: 

Cesarean section

CTG: 

Cardiotocography

ECV: 

External cephalic version

EFW: 

Estimated fetal weight

FHR: 

Fetal heart rate

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Riet van der Donk and Catherine Weber, members of our ECV team.

Funding

This was not involved in the study.

Availability of data and materials

The dataset used and analysed during the current study is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request..

Authors’ contributions

SK, IL and TH were involved in conception and design of the study. SH and IS analyzed the data. SK, TH and IS drafted the first manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The medical ethics review committee of the Catharina Hospital Eindhoven approved this research on March 15, 2007. Reference number: M06/1697. Written informed consent was obtained.

Consent for publication

Participants gave their consent for publication.

Of all participants who were included in the study written informed consent was taken.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Catharina Hospital, P.O. Box 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, the Netherlands
(2)
Department of Education and Research, Catharina Hospital, P.O. Box 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, the Netherlands

References

  1. Hofmeyr GJ, Kulier R, West HM. External cephalic version for breech presentation at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;4:CD000083.Google Scholar
  2. Hutton EK, Hofmeyr GJ, Dowswell T. External cephalic version for breech presentation before term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;7:CD000084.Google Scholar
  3. Murray-Davis B, Marion A, Malott A, Reitsma A, Hutton EK. Women's experiences of participating in the early external cephalic version 2 trial. Birth. 2012;39(1):30–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Rijnders M, Offerhaus P, van Dommelen P, Wiegers T, Buitendijk S. Prevalence, outcome, and women's experiences of external cephalic version in a low-risk population. Birth. 2010;37(2):124–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Ciliacus E, van der Zalm M, Truijens SE, Hasaart TH, Pop VJ, Kuppens SM. Fear for external cephalic version and depression: predictors of successful external cephalic version for breech presentation at term? BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:101.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Grootscholten K, Kok M, Oei SG, Mol BW, van der Post JA. External cephalic version-related risks: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112(5):1143–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Collaris RJ, Oei SG. External cephalic version: a safe procedure? A systematic review of version-related risks. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004;83(6):511–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hofmeyr GJ, Sonnendecker EW. Cardiotocographic changes after external cephalic version. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1983;90(10):914–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Weiner Z, Farmakides G, Hsieh H, Maulik D. Computerized analysis of fetal heart rate changes after antepartum external cephalic version. J Reprod Med. 1996;41(9):680–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kurup A, Arulkumaran S, Montan S, Ratnam SS. Need for fetal assessment prior to and during external cephalic version. Occurrence of transient cardiac asystole. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1993;72(1):60–2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Vyas S, Campbell S, Bower S, Nicolaides KH. Maternal abdominal pressure alters fetal cerebral blood flow. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990;97(8):740–2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Leung TY, Sahota DS, Fok WY, Chan LW, Lau TK. External cephalic version induced fetal cerebral and umbilical blood flow changes are related to the amount of pressure exerted. BJOG. 2004;111(5):430–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Lau TK, Lo KW, Chan LY, Leung TY, Lo YM. Cell-free fetal deoxyribonucleic acid in maternal circulation as a marker of fetal-maternal hemorrhage in patients undergoing external cephalic version near term. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183(3):712–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Lau TK, Lo KW, Leung TY, Fok WY, Rogers MS. Outcome of labour after successful external cephalic version at term complicated by isolated transient fetal bradycardia. BJOG. 2000;107(3):401–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kuppens SM, Kooistra L, Hasaart TH, van der Donk RW, Vader HL, Oei GS, et al. Maternal thyroid function and the outcome of external cephalic version: a prospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011;11:10.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Leung TY, Fok WY, Chan LW, Law W, Lau TK. Prediction of intrapartum cesarean delivery for non-reassuring fetal status after a successful external cephalic version by a low pre-version pulsatility index of the fetal middle cerebral artery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006;27:416–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Leung TY, Sahota DS, Fok WY, Chan LW, Lau TK. Quantification of contact surface pressure exerted during external cephalic version. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003;82(11):1017–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

Advertisement