This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Hormone concentrations throughout uncomplicated pregnancies: a longitudinal study
© The Author(s). 2016
Received: 5 May 2015
Accepted: 24 June 2016
Published: 4 July 2016
Evidence suggests that the hormonal milieu of pregnancy is an important determinant of subsequent cancer and other chronic diseases in both the mother and the offspring. Many of the existing maternity and birth cohorts include specimens drawn only once during pregnancy. How well a single blood specimen collected during a pregnancy characterizes exposure to these hormones throughout gestation, and also in subsequent pregnancies, is not well understood.
We used serial serum samples from 71 pregnant women (25 primiparous, 25 multiparous, and 21 with two consecutive pregnancies) with natural, complication-free pregnancies and a healthy offspring at term who participated in a population-based screening trial for congenital infections in Finland between January 1st, 1988 and June 30, 1989 and provided a blood sample in each trimester.
Hormone levels were more strongly correlated between consecutive trimesters of a pregnancy than between the 1st and 3rd trimester (e.g., estradiol, rT1 vs. T2 = 0.51 and rT2 vs. T3 = 0.60, p < 0.01; rT1 vs. T3 = 0.32, p < 0.05). Concentrations of sRANKL remained stable throughout gestation, whereas estradiol, estrone, progesterone, testosterone, prolactin, and osteoprotegerin increased throughout pregnancy. First trimester hormone concentrations explained less of the variation in the third trimester on their own than second trimester hormone levels (e.g. estradiol R2 T1 = 16 % and R2 T2 = 42 %). Addition of maternal (e.g., smoking) and/or child characteristics (e.g., sex) improved the accuracy of the 3rd trimester estimates for some of the hormones.
One hormone measurement in early pregnancy, in conjunction with maternal and fetal characteristics, permits estimation of 3rd trimester hormone concentrations. Therefore, single hormone measurements available from maternity cohorts are suitable to quantify hormone exposure during pregnancy. To our knowledge, we provide the first data on correlations between hormone concentrations both across trimesters of a single pregnancy, as well as between two subsequent pregnancies.
Depending on the outcome of interest, hormone concentrations measured at different periods during pregnancy may be of relevance. For instance, hormones measured in early pregnancy, during which fetal organogenesis takes place, may be important when neurodevelopmental conditions in the offspring are of interest, whereas hormone concentrations during late pregnancy may be relevant in relation to maternal risk of breast and ovarian cancers, given evidence that complete pregnancies are associated with these malignancies [3, 4].
Established biorepositories in Northern Europe (e.g., Finland) store sera collected during early pregnancy (predominantly in weeks 8 to 14) for screening of systemic infections such as HIV, hepatitis, and/or rubella. Worldwide, maternity and birth cohorts have been established to study associations between pregnancy and early-life exposures with health and disease outcomes in the mother and/or the offspring. Many of the existing cohorts include specimens drawn once during the first half of pregnancy [5–9], with few collections obtaining a blood sample later in pregnancy [10, 11]. Furthermore, only few studies obtained blood in consecutive trimesters from sizeable cohorts of pregnant women [12–14]. For many outcomes (e.g., chronic diseases in the off-spring in adulthood), a large study population is necessary as cohort members must be followed as long as decades to accumulate a sufficient number of cases for an investigation.
Whether a hormonal measurement from a single blood specimen collected early during a complication-free pregnancy is representative of exposure throughout gestation, or exposure in a subsequent pregnancy, is not established. From a research perspective, this knowledge could help optimize the use of existing maternity cohorts in which only specimens drawn once during the first half of pregnancy are available.
Therefore, the aim of our study was to explore the correlations between hormone concentrations measured in serum during the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd trimester of (1) a single uncomplicated pregnancy, (2) two subsequent uncomplicated pregnancies, and (3) to calculate how well 1st and/or 2nd trimester hormone levels estimate concentrations during 3rd trimester in an uncomplicated pregnancy. We measured sex steroids (estradiol, estrone, progesterone, and testosterone) and prolactin that are implicated in the development of maternal breast and ovarian cancer  and two new biomarkers (osteoprotegerin [OPG] and soluble receptor activator of nuclear factor kappaB ligand [sRANKL]) that have not yet been studied in detail.
We used serum samples from pregnant women collected in a population-based screening trial for congenital infections between January 1st, 1988 and June 30, 1989 in the 76 maternity centers in the metropolitan Helsinki (Finland) area. All pregnant women aged 15–45 years (n = 18,616) were invited to donate a blood sample during the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd trimesters of a pregnancy .
Among the 16,793 participants (90 %) who donated three serum samples we first selected women with a singleton, healthy offspring at term resulting from a natural, uncomplicated pregnancy. Women with an uncomplicated pregnancy were defined as women not being diagnosed with pre-eclampsia or hypertension during pregnancy and not being hospitalized due to threatening premature delivery or bleeding. In a second step, we randomly selected 25 women giving birth to their first child (primipara) and 25 women giving birth to their second child (multipara), aged 20–34 years and whose blood samples were obtained at weeks 10–12 (T1), weeks 20–22 (T2), and weeks 35–37 (T3) of one pregnancy. Additionally, 21 women with two consecutive singleton pregnancies during the study period were included. These women donated samples for both pregnancies in gestational weeks 8–14, 18–24, and 33–38. All blood samples were processed using a standardized protocol and stored at −20 °C .
Characteristics related to pregnancy (e.g., smoking during early pregnancy, pregnancy length, parity) and to the newborn (e.g., gender, birth weight and birth length) were obtained through linkages from the Finnish birth registry.
The study was approved by the ethical committees of the National Institute for Health and Welfare, Finland, University of Umeå, Sweden, and University of Heidelberg, Germany.
All hormonal analyses were performed at the Clinical Chemistry Laboratory of Umeå University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden. Serum specimens from each woman were assayed in the same laboratory run. In addition to routine laboratory quality controls, a pool of serum was created at the beginning of the study and two aliquots, undistinguishable from the study samples were inserted in each laboratory run. All reported intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation (CV) are based on the blinded pool quality controls.
Serum concentrations of sex steroids were quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS) on an Applied Biosystems API4000 triple stage quadrupole mass spectrometer. Serum prolactin (PRL) concentrations were measured by immunoassay (Elecsys Prolactin II, Roche, Mannheim, Germany). The determination of serum osteoprotegerin (OPG) concentrations was performed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (TNFRSF11B (Human) ELISA Kit, Abnova). Serum soluble RANK ligand (sRANKL) concentrations were determined by immunoassay (ampli-sRANKL, Biomedica, Vienna, Austria).
Intra- and inter-assay CVs were <18 % for all hormones with the exception of testosterone. The intra-assay CV for testosterone was 12 %, whereas the inter-assay CV was 44 %. After removing a single batch for testosterone, the inter-assay CV decreased to 12 %.
Out of 150 samples, sRANKL was below the detection limit in 21 samples, OPG was below the detection limit in one sample, and prolactin was below the detection limit in four samples.
Sex steroid hormones were measured in all samples, whereas PRL, OPG, and sRANKL were measured only in samples from women who gave birth once during the study period.
Women with one pregnancy were analyzed separately from those with two pregnancies.
Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was used to assess the correlations between the investigated hormones at the same point in time as well as between-trimester correlations for each hormone, and to measure the correlation of hormone concentrations between two consecutive pregnancies in the same woman. To test for differences between the correlation coefficients in the primiparous and multiparous women each correlation coefficient was converted into a z-score using Fisher's r-to-z transformation. The z-scores were then compared taking into account the sample sizes employed to obtain each coefficient . We considered adjustment for multiple comparison using the Bonferroni method (pBonf < 0.05/145 = 0.0003) as a secondary analysis.
We calculated median percentage changes in maternal hormone concentrations from the 1st to 3rd trimester and used the Kruskal Wallis test (pKW) to test the differences in hormone concentrations between the trimesters. The Mann–Whitney-U test (pMW) was used to assess whether hormone concentrations in the three trimesters were significantly different by parity (primipara vs. multipara), smoking status at first blood draw (current vs. no), and fetal sex (male vs. female).
The percentage changes in the 3rd trimester hormone concentrations were estimated per 1 % increase in hormone levels measured in the 1st and/or 2nd trimester, adjusted for gestational age. Maternal and newborn characteristics were added to these models one at a time to assess their individual contribution to 3rd trimester hormone concentrations.
We used the Wilcoxon signed rank sum test (pWS) to compare differences in hormone concentrations between trimesters of the two consecutive pregnancies.
For the study population of women with one full-term pregnancy, we conducted sensitivity analyses limited to women who were pregnant for the first (primigravid; n = 19) or second time (multigravid; n = 19) to assess whether observed differences between primiparous and multiparous women were due to gravidity or parity. Analyses on sRANKL were repeated replacing the missing values with the lower limit of detection of the assay (0.02 pmol/L).
All statistical tests were two-sided and considered significant at p < 0.05. Statistical analyses were performed with the Statistical Analyses System (SAS), version 9.3 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, North Carolina).
Baseline characteristics; median (range), or n (%)
One pregnancy during study period
Two consecutive pregnancies during study period
Primiparous (n = 25)
Multiparous (n = 25)
Pregnancy 1 (n = 21)
Pregnancy 2 (n = 21)
Maternal age, years
Pregnancy length, days
25 (100 %)
13 (62 %)
25 (100 %)
6 (29 %)
13 (62 %)
2 (9 %)
6 (29 %)
2 (9 %)
Child weight, kg
Child length, cm
10 (40 %)
13 (52 %)
14 (67 %)
14 (67 %)
15 (60 %)
12 (48 %)
7 (33 %)
7 (33 %)
19 (76 %)
20 (91 %)
13 (62 %)
13 (65 %)
6 (24 %)
2 (9 %)
8 (38 %)
7 (35 %)
Associations across trimesters of one pregnancy
Hormones of placental origin (estradiol, estrone, and progesterone) were highly correlated with each other (r > 0.72, p < 0.0001) and with PRL (r > 0.68, p < 0.0001; data not shown). More modest correlations were observed for OPG with PRL (r = 0.51), estrone (r = 0.52), estradiol (r = 0.59), and progesterone (r = 0.61; p for all <0.0001). Testosterone and progesterone were positively correlated (r = 0.34, p < 0.0001), whereas testosterone and sRANKL were negatively correlated (r = −0.30, p = 0.001). Gestational age was highly correlated with OPG, PRL, estrone, progesterone, and estradiol (r = 0.63 (OPG) to r = 0.89 (estradiol); p < 0.0001). Weak, borderline significant correlations in the 2nd and 3rd trimesters were observed for OPG with child length (rT2 = 0.33, rT3 = 0.28; p ≤ 0.05) and child weight (rT2 = 0.24, rT3 = 0.26; pT3 ≤ 0.10). Irrespective of trimester, sRANKL was not significantly correlated with child length (e.g., rT3 = 0.20, pT3 = 0.20) or child weight (e.g., rT3 = 0.11, pT3 = 0.47; data not shown).
Spearman correlation coefficients adjusted for gestational age between successive trimesters of one pregnancy a
Median hormone concentrations (10–90th percentiles) overall and by parity a
(n = 50)
(n = 25)
(n = 25)
Median %-change b
Median %-change b
Median %-change b
Median %-change b
Median %-change b
Median %-change b
Median %-change b
Testosterone concentrations were higher throughout gestation in women who reported smoking in early pregnancy relative to non-smoking women (e.g. T1 smoker = 1.69 ng/mL, T1 non-smoker = 0.89 ng/mL; pMW = 0.03). Third trimester concentrations of estradiol were higher in women reporting smoking in early pregnancy as compared to non-smoking women (T3 smoker = 25.7 ng/mL, T3 non-smoker = 18.6 ng/mL; pMW = 0.01), whereas levels of PRL were lower (T3 smoker = 136 ng/mL, T3 non-smoker = 221 ng/mL; pMW = 0.05). Lower PRL was observed in women carrying a boy as compared to women pregnant with a girl. However, this difference only reached statistical significance in the first trimester (T1 boy = 23.7 ng/mL; T1 girl = 32.7 ng/mL; pMW = 0.02; T2 boy = 101.6 ng/mL; T2 girl = 147.4 ng/mL; pMW = 0.09; T3 boy = 175.3 ng/mL; T3 girl = 222.4 ng/mL; pMW = 0.38; data not shown).
We further examined the effect of a 1 % unit increase in 1st and/or 2nd trimester hormone concentrations on the estimates of 3rd trimester hormone concentrations.
Percentage changes [95 % confidence intervals] in 3rd trimester hormone concentrations given 1st and 2nd trimester concentrations and maternal and newborn characteristics a
1st trimester hormone only
26 [7, 50]
31 [7, 62]
34 [10, 63]
71 [36, 115]
16 [3, 31]
33 [13, 57]
52 [35, 71]
Adjusted R2 - basic model
1st trimester hormone
Age at blood draw
−2 [−5, 1]
−1 [−7, 4]
0 [−3, 3]
−2 [−8, 5]
1 [−2, 4]
−2 [−5, 2]
−3 [−7, 1]
42 [11, 82]
33 [−20, 113]
14 [−13, 45]
85 [2, 236]
−41 [−82, −9]
−12 [−61, 29]
−27 [−103, 25]
−5 [−28, 16]
−4 [−49, 38]
−24 [−50, −3]
−57 [−158, 4]
32 [9, 60]
21 [−6, 55]
−18 [−58, 14]
27 [4, 54]
11 [−30, 59]
16 [−4, 40]
11 [−39, 71]
1 [−23, 27]
21 [−7, 56]
0 [−34, 34]
Birth length [per 5 cm]
−13 [−40, 9]
−39 [−102, 5]
−5 [−29, 17]
12 [−41, 76]
21 [−2, 51]
32 [0, 72]
12 [−23, 56]
Birth weight [per 100 g]
−1 [−2, 1]
−1 [−5, 2]
−1 [−2, 1]
0 [−4, 5]
2 [0, 4]
2 [0, 5]
1 [−2, 4]
Adjusted R2 - full model
2nd trimester hormone only
57 [35, 83]
76 [45, 114]
57 [36, 82]
103 [72, 140]
44 [29, 60]
64 [36, 98]
61 [45, 78]
Adjusted R2 - basic model
2nd trimester hormone
Age at blood draw
−1 [−3, 2]
0 [−4, 5]
0 [−2, 2]
1 [−4, 6]
−1 [−3, 1]
−3 [−7, 0]
−3 [−6, 1]
27 [2, 57]
21 [−22, 79]
20 [0, 44]
59 [1, 151]
−26 [−50, −5]
−1 [−41, 37]
−21 [−83, 25]
−2 [−21, 16]
2 [−30, 37]
−17 [−36, 0]
−8 [−63, 40]
16 [1, 34]
12 [−12, 42]
−8 [−39, 19]
8 [−9, 27]
−8 [−44, 24]
4 [−12, 22]
−10 [−52, 27]
2 [−15, 18]
7 [−18, 35]
−4 [−34, 23]
Birth length [per 5 cm]
−10 [−31, 9]
−20 [−63, 14]
−11 [−31, 6]
11 [−26, 57]
18 [1, 38]
14 [−14, 48]
24 [−5, 62]
Birth weight [per 100 g]
−1 [−3, 1]
−1 [−4, 2]
−1 [−2, 0]
0 [−3, 3]
1 [0, 2]
1 [−1, 4]
2 [−1, 4]
Adjusted R2 - full model
1st & 2nd trimester hormones
Adjusted R2 - basic model
Adjusted R2 - full model
Second trimester hormone concentrations explained 36 % (OPG) to 71 % (sRANKL) of the variation in the 3rd trimester on their own. Addition of maternal or child characteristics resulted in changes similar to those observed using 1st trimester concentrations (Table 4B), with slightly increased adjusted R2 statistics for testosterone, estradiol, progesterone, and PRL (7 % for testosterone to 12 % for PRL).
Models that included both 1st and 2nd trimester hormone concentrations but no other variables accounted for 37 % (OPG) to 70 % (sRANKL) of the variation observed in the 3rd trimester (Table 4C); results were similar after addition of all maternal and newborn characteristics.
Finally, we examined the extent to which 2nd and 3rd trimester hormone concentrations were associated with 1st trimester concentrations: second trimester hormone concentrations explained 25 % (estradiol and PRL) to 73 % (sRANKL) of the variation in the 1st trimester on their own, with slightly improvements after addition of maternal or child characteristics (Additional file 1A). Third trimester hormone concentrations explained <31 % (all hormones except sRANKL) of the variation in the 1st trimester on their own (Additional file 1B). Addition of 3rd trimester hormone concentrations to models based on 2nd trimester hormone concentrations did not improve adjusted R2 statistics (Additional file 1C).
Two consecutive pregnancies
Spearman correlation coefficients adjusted for gestational age in the trimesters between two successive pregnancies
Median hormone concentrations (10th-90th percentiles) and median change by trimester in 21 consecutive pregnancies a
−0.3 (−1.3; −1.3)
−0.3 (−0.9; 1.3)
−0.2 (−0.9; 0.5)
−0.2 (−1.1; 0.5)
−0.2 (−1.0; 0.4)
−0.3 (−0.6; 0.2)
0 (−0.5; 0.6)
−0.1 (−0.8; 1.0)
0.1 (−0.7; 0.5)
0 (−1.2; 0.5)
−0.2 (−0.9; 0.6)
−0.4 (−1.0; 0.2)
Sensitivity analyses (data not shown)
Results did not change when limiting the study population to primi- and multi-gravid women.
The presented results for testosterone are based on all measurements. Excluding the testosterone measurements from the batch that resulted in higher inter-batch CVs for this hormone (n = 80 samples) did not change the direction or significance of the associations with the exception of attenuated results for 3rd trimester levels by parity (original: T3 primi = 2.56 ng/mL vs. T3 multi = 0.71 ng/mL, pMW < 0.01; limited: T3 primi = 2.16 ng/mL vs. T3 multi = 0.69 ng/mL, pMW = 0.13).
Sensitivity analyses were also conducted replacing missing sRANKL values (n = 21 samples) with the lower detection limit of 0.02 pmol/L. This approach did not change the direction or significance of the associations (e.g., original: T1 primi = 0.32 pmol/L vs. T1 multi = 0.56 pmol/L, pMW = 0.04; replaced T1 primi = 0.22 pmol/L vs. T1 multi = 0.53 pmol/L, pMW = 0.04).
To our knowledge, we provide the first observational data on correlations between hormone concentrations both across trimesters of a single pregnancy, as well as between two subsequent pregnancies. Our data show that third trimester hormone concentrations can be estimated from concentrations measured in the 1st or 2nd trimester, and that including maternal and fetal covariates, most notably parity, smoking, and fetal sex improved the estimates.
During the first 9 weeks of pregnancy the corpus luteum and, to a lesser extent, the maternal ovary and the adrenal cortex, contribute to circulating concentrations of maternal estradiol, estrone, and progesterone. After this period, the placenta becomes the predominant source of maternal steroids . The substantial increase in maternal serum concentrations of estradiol, estrone, and progesterone throughout pregnancy is well established and was also evident in our study [16, 17]. The weaker and gradual increase in testosterone concentration across gestation has also been reported in prior longitudinal studies [17, 18].
Estradiol concentrations were correlated in two successive pregnancies in our investigation, with stronger coefficients in the 3rd (r = 0.68) as compared to the 1st (r = 0.47) trimester. A previous study based on 34 women with uncomplicated first and second full-term pregnancies reported a strong correlation (r = 0.78) between early estradiol levels in the consecutive pregnancies .
We observed a non-significant suggestion of lower estradiol concentrations throughout pregnancy in multiparous women. This is consistent with previous studies reporting lower first and second trimester estradiol levels in multiparous as compared to primiparous women [20–24]. The decreased concentrations of estradiol in multiparous women are hypothesized to be a result of increased pregnancy-induced 16α-hydroxylase activity in the maternal liver during earlier pregnancies leading to increased metabolism of estradiol and thus lower circulating estradiol in subsequent pregnancies . We observed significantly lower progesterone and testosterone concentrations in multiparous as compared to primiparous women; this was also reported in prior studies on early pregnancy hormones [21–24].
Women who smoked during pregnancy had higher 3rd trimester estradiol levels than non-smoking women. Prior studies based on 1st or 2nd trimester measurements reported no association of estradiol concentrations with smoking [21, 22, 24]. In agreement with our results, higher testosterone levels in smoking women were also observed in one  of two studies .
We observed no differences in hormone concentrations between women pregnant with a boy or a girl. Prior studies are inconsistent, with some reporting an increase in early pregnancy estradiol and testosterone concentrations in women pregnant with a girl [22, 23], and others observing no differences by fetal gender [21, 26]. A decrease in pregnancy progesterone levels in women carrying a female fetus was observed in one study that collected blood at gestational weeks 16 and 27 , but not in studies conducted in gestational weeks 6–20 [22, 23, 27].
Prolactin is produced by the pituitary gland in a pulsatile fashion and plays essential roles in mammary development and lactation, as well as reproduction . Though the decidua or the fetus cannot be ruled out as a potential source of PRL during pregnancy, it is believed that the maternal pituitary is the main source of PRL secretion in pregnant women .
We observed an increase in PRL levels with progressing pregnancy; this is consistent with prior longitudinal studies [17, 30] and a cross-sectional study . The increase in PRL concentration is believed to result from the stimulatory effect of estradiol, and to a lesser extent progesterone, on the pituitary gland .
Contrary to previous reports, we did not observe lower prolactin levels in multiparous as compared to primiparous women [20, 30]. Estrogens are hypothesized to stimulate the enlargement of the pituitary gland during pregnancy resulting in increased PRL concentrations, which parallel the increase in estrogens [29, 31]. In our study, the lack of an association between parity and PRL may be explained by the similar estradiol concentrations irrespective of parity. Two prior studies showing a decrease in PRL also observed decreased estradiol concentrations in multiparous women [20, 24].
Past studies reported lower early pregnancy PRL in women smoking during pregnancy as compared to non-smoking women [24, 30]. We observed a non-significant suggestion of lower PRL concentrations in smoking women in the 1st and 2nd trimester and significantly lower PRL levels in the 3rd trimester. Given that nicotine exposure induces dopamine release, which inhibits PRL secretion, smoking may cause reduced PRL levels .
We further observed significantly lower first trimester PRL levels in women pregnant with a boy as compared to women pregnant with a girl, whereas the lower levels in the 2nd or 3rd trimester were not significantly different. Prior studies investigating gender-related differences are inconclusive and reported lower levels in women carrying a girl (gestational weeks 16, 27, 34, or 36) [30, 33] or no association with fetal sex (gestational weeks 6–20, 28–32, 33–36, or 40) [34, 35]. A recent longitudinal study showed decreased PRL concentrations in women pregnant with a girl in gestation weeks 9–17 and increased concentrations at delivery . A plausible explanation for our findings is difficult to formulate as no consistent pattern is evident from available data. It is likely that the observed changes are not gender-related but due to other factors influencing PRL levels, such as stress or fasting status. However, data on these factors were not available for our study.
OPG and sRANKL
OPG and sRANKL are members of the tumor necrosis factor family and are involved in the regulation of bone resorption and bone mass .
The observed increase in OPG serum concentrations during pregnancy in our data has been reported in other longitudinal [37–39] and cross-sectional studies . The main source of maternal serum OPG during pregnancy is unclear, however the placenta and breast tissue express high amounts of OPG [37–39]. Concentrations of OPG did not vary with neonatal gender or parity in our study, consistent with a prior report .
We did not see any change in sRANKL concentrations during pregnancy in our data. To our knowledge, the only other study on sRANKL in pregnancy observed lower concentrations in late pregnancy as compared to pre-conception levels (mean at week 36 = 0.77 vs. mean before pregnancy = 1.03; p = 0.03) . We observed higher first trimester sRANKL concentrations in multiparous women than in primiparous women; to our knowledge this has not been previously reported.
Birth length, and to a lesser extent birth weight, were weakly correlated with OPG and sRANKL. To our knowledge, the only other study available to date observed positive correlations of child’s length and weight with sRANKL, but not with OPG concentrations at birth .
Our study has a number of strengths: 1) we specified 2-week ranges in each trimester for sample collection to account for the changing hormone concentrations during pregnancy; 2) with the equal number of primiparous and multiparous women, we were able to investigate hormone variations by parity; and 3) we focused on uncomplicated pregnancies with a healthy singleton offspring, as pregnancy-related complications (e.g. pre-eclampsia) can cause changes in the hormonal milieu.
One limitation is that sRANKL could not be quantified in 21 samples (14 %), as values were below the limit of detection. This might be because the majority of RANKL is cell bound and therefore not detectable in the circulation . However, sRANKL concentrations did not change during pregnancy and results based on the original values were almost identical when compared to those replacing the missing measurements by 0.02 pmol/L; the lower limit of detection of the assay. Another limitation is that smoking status was assessed during the first trimester only. As more than 60 % of women who smoke in the first trimester are reported to continue throughout pregnancy, [43, 44] the observed changes in estradiol, testosterone, and PRL levels are thus likely to represent concentrations in current smokers. Furthermore, we cannot rule out that some of our findings are due to chance as the sample size in some of the subgroup analyses was limited. Finally, while results of this study are informative for research purposes, they are not of clinical significance.
Our observational study shows that hormone concentrations measured in the 1st, 2nd, or 3rd trimester are correlated, as are hormone concentrations between pregnancies. Furthermore, to some extent it is possible to estimate selected 3rd trimester hormone concentrations based on one hormone measurement drawn in early gestation and pregnancy characteristics, whereas it appears to be less reliable to estimate early pregnancy concentrations using measurements from late pregnancy. As it is hypothesized that pregnancy is related to disease later in the mother and/or the offspring, the hormonal milieu of pregnancy is an area of interest for further investigation. Longitudinal studies investigating hormonal patterns from pre-conception through postpartum should be considered.
CV, coefficient of variation; OPG, osteoprotegerin; PRL, prolactin; sRANKL, soluble receptor activator of nuclear factor kappaB ligand
This work was supported by the National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health (Grant R01 CA120061) and the Lion’s Cancer Foundation at Umeå University, Sweden. R.T.F. was supported by a Marie Curie International Incoming Fellowship within the 7th European Community Framework Programme (PIIF-GA-2013-623984).
Availability of data and materials
All data supporting the findings in the study are contained within the manuscript.
All authors contributed to the design of the study. HS and RTF drafted and edited the manuscript. KG and HAL coordinated the biochemical assays and HS performed the statistical analyses with guidance from AZJ All authors contributed to the interpretation of the study results, critical revision of the manuscript and have read and approved the final manuscript.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Consent for publication
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study was conducted after ethical clearance from the National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL; Finland), University of Umeå (Sweden), and University of Heidelberg (Germany). Informed consent was obtained before acquisition of all maternal serum specimens. Furthermore, possible consequences of the procedure and data derived from serum analyses were explained.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Lukanova A, Surcel HM, Lundin E, Kaasila M, Lakso HA, Schock H, et al. Circulating estrogens and progesterone during primiparous pregnancies and risk of maternal breast cancer. Int J Cancer. 2012;130(4):910–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Whitaker-Azmitia PM, Lobel M, Moyer A. Low maternal progesterone may contribute to both obstetrical complications and autism. Medical hypotheses. 2014;82(3):313–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Braem MG, Onland-Moret NC, Schouten LJ, Kruitwagen RF, Lukanova A, Allen NE, et al. Multiple miscarriages are associated with the risk of ovarian cancer: results from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. PloS one. 2012;7(5), e37141.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Beral V, Bull D, Doll R, Peto R, Reeves G. Breast cancer and abortion: collaborative reanalysis of data from 53 epidemiological studies, including 83 000 women with breast cancer from 16 countries. Lancet. 2004;363(9414):1007–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pukkala E. Nordic biological specimen bank cohorts as basis for studies of cancer causes and control: quality control tools for study cohorts with more than two million sample donors and 130,000 prospective cancers. In: Dillner J, editor. Methods in biobanking. Volume 675, New York: Humana Press; 2011: p. 61-112.Google Scholar
- van Eijsden M, Vrijkotte TG, Gemke RJ, van der Wal MF. Cohort profile: the Amsterdam Born Children and their Development (ABCD) study. Int J Epidemiol. 2011;40(5):1176–86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- van Gelder MM, Bretveld RW, Roukema J, Steenhoek M, van Drongelen J, Spaanderman ME, et al. Rationale and design of the PRegnancy and Infant DEvelopment (PRIDE) Study. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2013;27(1):34–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Moraes TJ, Lefebvre DL, Chooniedass R, Becker AB, Brook JR, Denburg J, et al. The Canadian healthy infant longitudinal development birth cohort study: biological samples and biobanking. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2015;29(1):84–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Veyhe AS, Hansen S, Sandanger TM, Nieboer E, Odland J. The Northern Norway mother-and-child contaminant cohort study: implementation, population characteristics and summary of dietary findings. Int J Circumpolar Health. 2012;71:18644.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kishi R, Sasaki S, Yoshioka E, Yuasa M, Sata F, Saijo Y, et al. Cohort profile: the Hokkaido study on environment and children's health in Japan. Int J Epidemiol. 2011;40(3):611–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wright J, Small N, Raynor P, Tuffnell D, Bhopal R, Cameron N, et al. Cohort Profile: the Born in Bradford multi-ethnic family cohort study. Int J Epidemiol. 2013;42(4):978–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Andersen AM, Olsen J. The Danish National Birth Cohort: selected scientific contributions within perinatal epidemiology and future perspectives. Scand J Public Health. 2011;39(7 Suppl):115–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tao FB, Hao JH, Huang K, Su PY, Cheng DJ, Xing XY, et al. Cohort Profile: the China-Anhui Birth Cohort Study. Int J Epidemiol. 2013;42(3):709–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lappalainen M, Koskela P, Hedman K, Teramo K, Ammala P, Hiilesmaa V, et al. Incidence of primary toxoplasma infections during pregnancy in southern Finland: a prospective cohort study. Scand J Infect Dis. 1992;24(1):97–104.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cohen J, Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS. Multiple Regression/Correlation with two or more independent variables. In: Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, vol. 3. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2003. p. 64–100.Google Scholar
- Taylor RN, Lebovic DI. The Endocrinology of Pregnancy. In: Greenspan FS, Gardner DG, editors. Basic & Clinical Endocrinology. New York: Lange Medical Books/McGraw-Hill; 2004. p. 637–57.Google Scholar
- O'Leary P, Boyne P, Flett P, Beilby J, James I. Longitudinal assessment of changes in reproductive hormones during normal pregnancy. Clin Chem. 1991;37(5):667–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kerlan V, Nahoul K, Le Martelot MT, Bercovici JP. Longitudinal study of maternal plasma bioavailable testosterone and androstanediol glucuronide levels during pregnancy. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1994;40(2):263–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bernstein L, Lipworth L, Ross RK, Trichopoulos D. Correlation of estrogen levels between successive pregnancies. American Journal of Epidemiology. 1995;142(6):625–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Arslan AA, Zeleniuch-Jacquotte A, Lukanova A, Afanasyeva Y, Katz J, Levitz M, et al. Effects of parity on pregnancy hormonal profiles across ethnic groups with a diverse incidence of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15(11):2123–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wuu J, Hellerstein S, Lipworth L, Wide L, Xu B, Yu GP, et al. Correlates of pregnancy oestrogen, progesterone and sex hormone-binding globulin in the USA and China. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2002;11(3):283–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Toriola AT, Vaarasmaki M, Lehtinen M, Zeleniuch-Jacquotte A, Lundin E, Rodgers KG, et al. Determinants of Maternal Sex Steroids During the First Half of Pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(5):1029–36.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Järvelä IY, Záčková T, Laitinen P, Ryynänen M, Tekay A. Effect of parity and fetal sex on placental and luteal hormones during early first trimester. Prenat Diagn. 2012;32(2):160–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Troisi R, Hoover RN, Thadhani R, Hsieh CC, Sluss P, Ballard-Barbash R, et al. Maternal, prenatal and perinatal characteristics and first trimester maternal serum hormone concentrations. Br J Cancer. 2008;99(7):1161–4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Musey VC, Collins DC, Brogan DR, Santos VR, Musey PI, Martino-Saltzman D, et al. Long term effects of a first pregnancy on the hormonal environment: estrogens and androgens. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 1987;64(1):111–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kuijper EA, Ket JC, Caanen MR, Lambalk CB. Reproductive hormone concentrations in pregnancy and neonates: a systematic review. Reprod Biomed Online. 2013;27(1):33–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Enninga EA, Nevala WK, Creedon DJ, Markovic SN, Holtan SG. Fetal sex-based differences in maternal hormones, angiogenic factors, and immune mediators during pregnancy and the postpartum period. American journal of reproductive immunology. 2015;73(3):251–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Freeman ME, Kanyicska B, Lerant A, Nagy G. Prolactin: structure, function, and regulation of secretion. Physiol Rev. 2000;80(4):1523–631.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kletzky OA, Marrs RP, Howard WF, McCormick W, Mishell Jr DR. Prolactin synthesis and release during pregnancy and puerperium. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980;136(4):545–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Xu B, Lipworth L, Wide L, Wuu J, Yu SZ, Lagiou P, et al. Maternal and gestational correlates of pregnancy prolactin and growth hormone in USA and China. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2003;12(1):35–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ben-Jonathan N, LaPensee CR, LaPensee EW. What can we learn from rodents about prolactin in humans? Endocr Rev. 2008;29(1):1–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kapoor D, Jones TH. Smoking and hormones in health and endocrine disorders. Eur J Endocrinol. 2005;152(4):491–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gonzalez FA, Hobel CJ, Buster JE. Fetal gender effects on maternal serum prolactin levels. J Reprod Med. 1987;32(1):21–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hercz P, Kazy Z, Siklos P, Ungar L. Quantitative comparison of serum steroid and peptide hormone concentrations in male and female fetuses in the maternal-fetoplacental system during the 28th-40th weeks of pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1989;30(3):201–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Potischman N, Troisi R, Thadhani R, Hoover RN, Dodd K, Davis WW, et al. Pregnancy hormone concentrations across ethnic groups: implications for later cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14(6):1514–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lacey DL, Timms E, Tan HL, Kelley MJ, Dunstan CR, Burgess T, et al. Osteoprotegerin ligand is a cytokine that regulates osteoclast differentiation and activation. Cell. 1998;93(2):165–76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Uemura H, Yasui T, Kiyokawa M, Kuwahara A, Ikawa H, Matsuzaki T, et al. Serum osteoprotegerin/osteoclastogenesis-inhibitory factor during pregnancy and lactation and the relationship with calcium-regulating hormones and bone turnover markers. J Endocrinol. 2002;174(2):353–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Naylor KE, Rogers A, Fraser RB, Hall V, Eastell R, Blumsohn A. Serum osteoprotegerin as a determinant of bone metabolism in a longitudinal study of human pregnancy and lactation. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 2003;88(11):5361–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Essley B, McNanley T, Cooper B, McIntyre A, Witter F, Harris Z, et al. Osteoprotegerin in pregnant adolescents differs by race and is related to infant birth weight z-score. J Dev Orig Health Dis. 2011;2(5):272–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Hong JS, Santolaya-Forgas J, Romero R, Espinoza J, Goncalves LF, Kim YM, et al. Maternal plasma osteoprotegerin concentration in normal pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(3 Pt 2):1011–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Tenta R, Bourgiezi I, Aliferis E, Papadopoulou M, Gounaris A, Skouroliakou M. Bone metabolism compensates for the delayed growth in small for gestational age neonates. Organogenesis. 2013;9(1):55–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Rogers A, Eastell R. Circulating osteoprotegerin and receptor activator for nuclear factor kappaB ligand: clinical utility in metabolic bone disease assessment. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 2005;90(11):6323–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Roza SJ, Verhulst FC, Jaddoe VW, Steegers EA, Mackenbach JP, Hofman A, et al. Maternal smoking during pregnancy and child behaviour problems: the Generation R Study. Int J Epidemiol. 2009;38(3):680–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- De Wilde KS, Trommelmans LC, Laevens HH, Maes LR, Temmerman M, Boudrez HL. Smoking patterns, depression, and sociodemographic variables among Flemish women during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Nursing research. 2013;62(6):394–404.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar