Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Maternal hepatitis B virus carrier status and pregnancy outcomes: a prospective cohort study

  • Ai-Ming Cui1,
  • Xiao-Yan Cheng1,
  • Jian-Guo Shao2,
  • Hai-Bo Li3,
  • Xu-Lin Wang4,
  • Yi Shen4,
  • Li-Jing Mao1,
  • Sheng Zhang4,
  • Hai-Yun Liu1,
  • Lei Zhang5 and
  • Gang Qin2, 4Email author
Contributed equally
BMC Pregnancy and ChildbirthBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201616:87

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-0884-1

Received: 25 November 2015

Accepted: 21 April 2016

Published: 26 April 2016

Abstract

Background

Infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) in pregnant women may be a threat for both mothers and fetuses. This study was performed to explore the impact of maternal HBV carrier status on pregnancy outcomes.

Methods

We conducted a prospective cohort study at the Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital of Nantong University between January 1, 2012 and September 30, 2015. A consecutive sample of 21,004 pregnant women, 513 asymptomatic HBV carriers and 20,491 non-HBV controls, was included in this study. The main outcomes of interest were selected pregnancy outcomes including miscarriage, stillbirth, preterm birth (PTB), gestational diabetes (GDM), intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP), preterm premature rupture of the membrane (PPROM), low birth weight (LBW), small for gestational age (SGA) and Apgar scores. The incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes between asymptomatic HBV carriers and non-HBV controls were compared using the chi-square test and logistic regression. P values were two sided, and P <0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

Results

The incidences of stillbirth, PTB, GDM, ICP, PPROM, LBW, and SGA were similar between the HBV carrier and non-HBV groups. The proportion of miscarriage was significantly higher among the HBV carriers than the controls (9.36 % vs 5.70 %; P <0.001). After using multivariate modelling to adjust for possible socio-demographical variables and obstetric complications, women with HBV carrier status were still more likely to have miscarriage (adjusted OR 1.71, 95 % CI 1.23–2.38). In addition, the incidences of other maternal and neonatal outcomes were similar between the two groups.

Conclusion

Maternal HBV carrier status may be an independent risk factor for miscarriage and careful surveillance is warranted.

Keywords

Pregnancy Hepatitis B virus infection Miscarriage

Background

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is one of the most common health problems worldwide. The prevalence of HBV infection among women of childbearing age may be as high as 2–8 % in China [1, 2], whereas in the USA it is only 0.4 % [3]. Most pregnant women with HBV infection are chronic carriers, indicated by positive serum hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) status. HBsAg expression has also been found in cells of the ovarian follicle or placental capillary endothelium [4]. Intrauterine infection and vertical transmission of HBV is a fundamental reason why there are so many chronic HBV carriers in China. The overall estimated rates of immunoprophylaxis failure for infants with HBsAg-positive and HBeAg-positive mothers were 4.87 and 9.66 % respectively [5].

Although HBV carrier status is relatively common among pregnant women, especially in highly endemic countries such as China, there is a paucity of data regarding the impact of maternal HBV infection on the risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes. The limited studies on this issue have always yielded conflicting results [615].

Due to this dearth of information, we undertook this hospital-based prospective cohort study, which seeks to examine the association of HBV carrier status with pregnancy outcomes.

Methods

Study design and participant population

We conducted a prospective cohort study at the Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital of Nantong University, China between January 1, 2012 and September 30, 2015. All pregnant women who visited the tertiary teaching hospital were screened and recruited through 2012 to 2014. Data on maternal characteristics (age, education, medical history) were taken from questionnaires completed by women after their first antenatal visit. Body mass index (BMI) was classified according to the WHO classification: underweight (<18.5 kg/m2), normal weight (18.5–24.9 kg/m2), overweight (25–29.9 kg/m2) or obesity (≥30 kg/m2) [16]. As part of standard prenatal care at our hospital, all women are screened in the first trimester of pregnancy for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg), IgG antibodies against HCV and HIV, syphilis tests with the treponema pallidum particle agglutination assay (TP-PA) and RPR, specific IgM antibodies against toxoplasma, rubella virus, CMV and HSV-1/2.

All enrolled participants fulfilled the following criteria: (i) normal alanine transaminase (ALT) at study entry; (ii) no evidence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection (anti-HCV negative), (iii) absence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection (anti-HIV negative) and active syphilis infection (rapid plasma reagin test/RPR negative); (iv) absence of IgM antibodies against toxoplasma (TOX), rubella virus (RV), cytomegalovirus (CMV), herpes simplex virus (HSV-1/2); (v) exclusion of other liver diseases such as alcoholic liver diseases (ALDs), nonalcoholic fatty liver diseases (NAFLDs) or autoimmune liver diseases (AILDs); (vi) absence of pre-existing chronic diseases such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, or heart diseases. HBV carriers were defined as: HBsAg positivity >6 months confirmed by previous medical history, and persistently normal levels of ALT before and at study entry. In addition, HBV carriers were excluded if they had received antiviral treatment within the previous year.

A total of 24,713 pregnant women were reviewed and screened in their first trimester of pregnancy at the Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital of Nantong University, China. Of these, 3382 were excluded: due to abnormal ALT or other liver diseases (HCV infection, ALDs, NAFLDs, or AILDs) in 1065 subjects; due to other infection (HIV infection, active syphilis infection, positivity of anti-TOX IgM, anti-RV IgM, anti-CMV IgM or anti-HSV IgM) in 1788 subjects; due to concurrent medical complications (DM, hypertension or heart diseases) in 529 subjects. Thereafter, 21,331 pregnant women were enrolled in this study, including 519 asymptomatic HBV carriers and 20,812 non-HBV controls. Most of the enrolled subjects received at least three health examinations and were followed-up until delivery or miscarriage. 327 subjects were excluded because of the following reasons: acute hepatitis in 35 subjects (hepatitis E in 27 subjects and hepatitis A in eight subjects); lost to follow-up in 159 subjects; incomplete data in 133 subjects. Finally, 21,004 subjects, with 513 asymptomatic HBV carriers (HBeAg positive in 159 subjects) and 20,491 non-HBV controls, were included to evaluate the effect of chronic HBV carrier status on the pregnancy outcomes (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Flow chart for study population. HBV, hepatitis B virus; ALT, alanine transaminase; HCV, hepatitis C virus; HIV human immunodeficiency virus; RPR, rapid plasma reagin test; TOX, toxoplasma; RV, rubella virus; CMV, cytomegalovirus, HSV, herpes simplex virus; ALD, alcoholic liver disease; NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver diseases; AILD, autoimmune liver disease; DM, diabetes mellitus

The study protocol was approved by the institutional ethics committee of the Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital of Nantong University and conducted in accord with the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from each patient.

Pregnancy outcomes

Primary pregnancy outcomes were: miscarriage (spontaneous abortion), preterm (<37w), or stillbirth (after 20 completed gestational weeks). Other maternal outcomes included preeclampsia, gestational diabetes (GDM), placenta previa, placental abruption, and preterm premature rupture of the membranes (PPROM). Neonatal outcomes for singleton pregnancy included low birth weight (LBW, <2,500 g) or macrosomia (≥4,000 g), small for gestational age (SGA; defined as a birth weight below the 10th percentile for each gestational age using sex-specific criteria) [17, 18] and Apgar score (<7 at 5 min). The rate of cesarean section was not assessed because China has nearly 50 % caesarean delivery rate due to “social influence” rather than medical or obstetric indication [19].

Statistical analysis

According to a recent survey conducted in China, the prevalence of HBsAg among pregnant women was 6.1 % [1]. With the assumption that the ratio of HBV carriers to non-HBV subjects was 1:20, the baseline risk for adverse pregnancy outcome was 5 % and there might be 2-fold increase of risk with a power of 80 %, the minimum sample size of approximately 4200 participants including 200 HBV carriers were required.

The continuous data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and categorical data as number or percent. Comparison of continuous variables was done by student t test. For categorical variables the chi-square or Fisher’s exact test were used. Selected maternal and neonatal outcomes in all pregnancies or singleton pregnancies were calculated per woman and/or per infant when appropriate. In this analysis, miscarriage was taken as the dependent variable. Demographic, education, medical history, and laboratory factors were taken as independent variables. Risk factors found significant on univariate analysis were entered into multivariate logistic regression model. All statistical tests were 2-tailed, and a significance level (P) of 0.05 was used. The statistical analyses were performed with Stata version 13 (StataCorp, USA).

Results

Participant characteristics

The demographic and clinical data of 21,004 study subjects are shown in Table 1. The mean age (SD) of the asymptomatic HBV carrier group was slightly but significantly older than that of the control group (27.59 ± 4.02 vs. 27.03 ± 4.19 years, P <0.01). But no significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of the proportion of older pregnant women (aged 35 years or more). HBV carriers also had significantly higher serum ALT levels than controls (24.75 ± 7.22 vs. 22.34 ± 6.49 U/L, P < 0.001). Moreover, there was no significant difference in terms of height, pre-maternal BMI, education level, parity, history of miscarriage or preterm birth, plurality, and in vitro fertilization (IVF) between the HBV carriers and the controls.
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of the study populationa

Characteristic

HBV carriers (n = 513)

Controls (n = 20491)

P

Maternal age (y)

27.59 ± 4.02

27.03 ± 4.19

0.003

 ≤19

2

239

0.234

 20–34

476

18,974

 

 ≥35 (older pregnancy)

35

12,78

 

Height (cm)

156.23 ± 8.43

155.81 ± 7.32

0.201

Pre-pregnancy BMI

22.34 ± 5.86

22.02 ± 5.69

0.209

 <18.5

35

1,751

0.396

 18.5–24.9

408

16,137

 

 25–29.9

67

2,536

 

 ≥30

3

67

 

Education

 Primary/under

15

892

0.288

 Middle/High school

171

6,785

 

 College/above

327

12,814

 

Parity

 0

373

15,524

0.258

 1

126

4,519

 

 ≥2

14

448

 

Previous abortion

 0

456

18,607

0.385

 1

42

1,329

 

 ≥2

15

555

 

Previous preterm birth

  

0.907

 0

504

20,168

 

 1

9

320

 

 ≥2

0

3

 

Plurality

 1

497

20,001

0.288

 ≥2

16

490

 

IVF

 No

509

20,344

0.869

 Yes

4

147

 

ALT (U/L)

24.75 ± 7.22

22.34 ± 6.49

<0.001

Abbreviations: BMI body mass index, IVF in vitro fertilization

aValues are reported as mean ± SD, compared with t test, or number, compared with χ 2 test, unless otherwise indicated

During the follow-up, 20885 patients had persistently normal levels of serum ALT, while 119 (0.57 %) patients experienced at least one episode of ALT > the upper limit of normal (ULN, 40U/L). Among them, 6 HBV carriers and 112 non-HBV controls showed a mild ALT increase (≤2ULN), while only 1 non-HBV subject showed a moderate ALT increase (>2ULN). All the ALT elevation was transient and usually recovered to normal levels within 3 months.

Pregnancy outcomes

The mean (SD) of completed weeks’ gestation was significantly shorter in HBV carriers than in the non-HBV controls (35.79 ± 8.29 vs. 36.95 ± 6.76; P <0.001). The proportion of miscarriage was significantly higher among the HBV carriers than the controls (9.36 % vs 5.70 %; P <0.001). Meanwhile, there was no significant difference between the two groups for most of the pregnancy outcomes such as preterm birth, stillbirth, GDM, ICP, placenta previa or PPROM (Table 2).
Table 2

Comparison of the pregnancy outcomes between asymptomatic HBV carriers and non-HBV controlsa

Outcome

HBV carriers (n = 513)

Controls (n = 20,491)

P

Completed weeks’ gestation

35.79 ± 8.29

36.95 ± 6.76

<0.001

 ≤12 wks

36

822

0.002

 12 1/7 to 28 wks

13

390

 

 28 1/7 to 40 wks

369

14,755

 

 >40 wks

95

4,524

 

Preterm birth

49 (9.55 %)

1,718 (8.38 %)

0.347

Stillbirth

0

18 (0.09 %)

0.502

Miscarriage

48 (9.36 %)

1,167 (5.70 %)

<0.001

Preeclampsia

4 (0.78 %)

216 (1.05 %)

0.600

GDM

6 (1.17 %)

232 (1.13 %)

0.937

ICP

12 (2.34 %)

331 (1.62 %)

0.201

Placenta previa

4 (0.78 %)

216 (1.05 %)

0.547

PPROM

23 (4.48 %)

845 (4.12 %)

0.686

Abbreviations: GDM Gestational diabetes, ICP intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, PPROM preterm premature rupture of the membrane

aValues are reported as mean ± SD, compared with t test, or number (percentage), compared with χ 2 test, unless otherwise indicated

In singleton pregnancy, the rate of miscarriage was also significantly higher in HBV carrier group than in the control group (9.66 % vs. 5.81 %, P <0.001). Preterm birth occurred in 36/497 (7.24 %) and 1462/20,001 (7.31 %) of pregnancies in HBV carrier and control group respectively (P >0.05). The mean (SD) birth weight was 3311.26 (510.34) g and 3330 (509.08) g in the two groups respectively (P >0.05). Comparable neonatal adverse outcomes occurred in the two groups (e.g., <1,500 g: 0.80 % vs. 0.54 %; <2,500 g: 5.03 % vs. 4.52 %; SGA: 4.43 % vs. 5.16 %; respectively). There were no significant differences in incidences of perinatal mortality or Apgar score <7 at 5 min (Table 3).
Table 3

Neonatal outcomes in singleton pregnancya

Outcome

HBV carriers (n = 497)

Controls (n = 20,001)

P

Full-term birth

413 (83.10 %)

17,364 (86.82 %)

0.016

Preterm birth

36 (7.24 %)

1462 (7.31 %)

0.955

Stillbirth

0

12 (0.06 %)

0.585

Miscarriage

48 (9.66 %)

1163 (5.81 %)

<0.001

Weight of neonates (g)

3311.26 ± 510.34

3330 ± 509.08

0.436

 Unknown

0

9

 

 <1500 g

4

108

0.585

 1500–2500 g

21

797

 

 2500–3999 g

392

17,489

 

 ≥4000 g

32

1,598

 

LBW

 Unknown

0

9

 

 No

472

19,087

0.594

 Yes

25

905

 

SGA <10 centile

 Unknown

0

9

0.461

 No

475

18,959

 

 Yes

22

1,033

 

Apgar at 5 min

9.90 ± 0.53

9.87 ± 0.69

0.336

 ≥7

488

19,744

0.292

 <7

9

257

 

Abbreviations: LBW low birth weight, SGA small for gestational age

aValues are reported as mean ± SD, compared with t test, or number (percentage), compared with χ 2 test, unless otherwise indicated

Risk factors associated with miscarriage

Table 4 presents crude and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) of miscarriage associated with demographic, physical, reproductive and laboratory characteristics. When single factors were analyzed for the risk of miscarriage, five factors had been identified: (i) history of miscarriage with crude OR of 7.95 (95 % CI 6.85–9.22) for once and crude OR of 18.89 (95 % CI 15.72–22.71) for twice or more respectively; (ii) in vitro fertilization (crude OR 2.37, 95 % CI 1.46–3.84); (iii) older age (crude OR 2.22, 95 % CI 1.85–2.66); (iv) HBV carrier status (crude OR 1.71, 95 % CI 1.26–2.31); and (v) nulliparity (crude OR 1.48, 95 % CI 1.31–1.69). We did not find the association of education level, pre-maternal BMI with miscarriage risk. Furthermore, we examined the covariates associated with miscarriage using multivariable logistic regression. Factors independently associated with miscarriage were: prior abortion (adjusted OR 9.33 for once, adjusted OR 23.36 for twice or more), nulliparity (adjusted OR 1.80), IVF (adjusted OR 1.78), and HBV carrier status (adjusted OR 1.71).
Table 4

Risk factors associated with miscarriage

 

Cases/Exposed

Crude OR (95 % CI)

Adjusted OR (95 % CI)

Age

 <35

1067/19691

1

1

 ≥35

148/1313

2.22 (1.85–2.66)

1.17 (0.94–1.45)

Nulliparity

 No

830/15897

1

1

 Yes

385/5107

1.48 (1.31–1.69)

1.80 (1.54–2.11)

Education

 High school/under

497/8063

1

 

 College/above

718/12941

0.83 (0.67–1.19)

 

Pre-maternal BMI

 <25

1049/18331

1

 

 ≥25

166/2673

1.09 (0.97–1.42)

 

Previous abortion

 0

673/19063

1

1

 1

309/1371

7.95 (6.85–9.22)

9.33 (7.97–10.92)

 ≥2

233/570

18.89 (15.72–22.71)

23.36 (19.10–28.57)

HBV carrier

 No

1167/20491

1

1

 Yes

48/513

1.71 (1.26–2.31)

1.71 (1.23–2.38)

IVF

 No

1196/20853

1

1

 Yes

19/151

2.37 (1.46–3.84)

1.78 (1.03–3.05)

Abbreviations: BMI body mass index, IVF in vitro fertilization

Discussion

Our prospective cohort study shows that the incidence of miscarriage in pregnant women with chronic HBV infection is significantly higher than that in non-HBV controls. The association remain unchanged after adjustment for other possible maternal confounders such as age, parity and history of abortion. This result is surprising. We for the first time report that HBV carrier status entails a considerable increased risk of miscarriage.

The relationship between viral infections and miscarriage has not been well-understood. On the one hand, several viruses such as CMV, HSV-1/2, human parvovirus B19 (HPV B19), adenovirus, Coxsackie B virus, have been indicated to be causative agents of miscarriage [20, 21]. On the other hand, the causal relationship of other viruses with miscarriage has not been established for some reasons. First, viral infection of the pregnant women may not always represent fetal infection because of the placental barrier. Second, placental viral infection indicates risk of vertical transmission, but not always transmission to, or disease of the fetus. Last, the intrauterine viral infection does not always cause morbidity or mortality at the early stage of the fetus. For example, the rate of miscarriage following acute varicella did not exceed the rate of miscarriage in pregnant women without chickenpox [22].

The question whether HBV infection in the mothers entails an increased risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes was raised in the 1960s [23], and has been followed by several studies with contradictory and confusing results. For the case–control studies [810], the selection bias is a big concern. For the retrospective cohort studies [11, 1315], information for early pregnancy is incomplete. For the prospective cohort studies [7, 12], small sample sizes (with 1576 and 1826 participants respectively) are their major limitation. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first prospective single-center study on HBV carriers during pregnancy to date. Our finding implies that chronic HBV carrier status is likely to affect placental function rather than preterm labor.

The study population had a high level of homogeneity in that nearly all participants were ethnic Han from an eastern region of China and all were asymptomatic. Although the prevalence of HBsAg (2.5 %) among pregnant women in this study was much lower than that (6.1 %) in another survey conducted in a southwest region of China in 2010 [1], its epidemiologic power is still strong. In such a sample of more than 500 women who were exposed to chronic HBV infection in pregnancy with a ratio of 1:40 to the controls and the assumption of a baseline miscarriage risk of 5 %, the detection of a 1.7-fold increase in the rate of miscarriage (with 95 % CI), yielded a power of 90 %.

It should be noted that in this study asymptomatic HBV carriers had significantly higher serum ALT levels than non-HBV controls, suggesting that even in clinically asymptomatic infection, HBV may still produce adverse effects on the liver. Their longer-term effects on the liver as well as metabolic profiles await further examinations. Asymptomatic HBV carriers can be categorized into two clinical HBV phases: immune tolerance (IT) and inactive carrier (IC) [24]. IT patients had positive serum HBeAg and repetitive normal ALT values (<40 IU/L) for at least 1 year. Patients with typical IT form (very high viral load HBV-DNA ≥2 × 106 IU/mL) have very limited liver injury, while patients with atypical form (HBV-DNA <2 × 106 IU/mL) have a potential risk of more severe histological lesions. IC patients had repetitive normal ALT values (<40 IU/L) for at least 1 year, negative HBeAg and positive HBeAb. Patients with typical IC form have low viral load (HBV-DNA <2,000 IU/mL) and minimal histological lesions, while patients with atypical form had higher HBV-DNA (≥2,000 IU/mL) remain problematic. Therefore, the absence of symptoms is not enough to accurately separate patients with significant progressive liver injury from inactive HBsAg carriers [25].

Our study has shown that the majority of pregnant women maintain persistently normal levels of serum ALT through the pregnancy. Elevation of ALT was usually within 1–2 × ULN, and decrease to normal levels within three months. The incidence of abnormal ALT is 0.57 % through the study. This rate seems significantly lower than the estimated incidence rate of 3 % for abnormal liver functions as previously reported in other population studies [26]. A possible explanation may be the inclusion criteria of this study, i.e. no pre-existing chronic liver diseases, no concurrent medical diseases, treatment-naive HBV carrier status, and normal ALT level at study entry.

The outcome of a woman’s previous pregnancy has profound consequences for her subsequent pregnancies. We found that the most important predictive factor for miscarriage is a history of spontaneous or induced abortion, in accordance with previous studies [27, 28]. The etiology of recurrent pregnancy loss is still unclear [29]. While induced abortion may increase the risks for both a subsequent preterm delivery and mood disorders substantial, the association of previous induced abortion with subsequent miscarriage remains controversial [30].

Admittedly, our study has several limitations. First of all, we were only able to locate very few data regarding viral load in these HBV carriers. Thus, we were unable to conclude any significant correlation between higher viral loads at the time of pregnancy and adverse outcomes. Second, some potential confounders which might affect pregnancy outcomes have not been included. For example, cigarette, alcohol, and caffeine consumption may be risk factors for miscarriage. Actually, in Chinese culture, women are discouraged from drinking alcohol and from smoking cigarette. Most people drink tea over coffee in China as well. Another limitation is single-center nature of this study. Indeed, the Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital of Nantong University is the sole special hospital for the treatment of women illnesses in Nantong city, eastern China, and serves more than half of obstetric population in this region.

Conclusion

This study reflects the clinical reality of pregnant women and indicates that HBV carrier status confers a substantial increased risk for miscarriage. Careful surveillance as high-risk pregnancy is warranted. Further studies are needed to assess the importance of factors such as disease activity, viral characteristics, and other clinical features of the disease.

Ethics

The study protocol was approved by the institutional ethics committee of the Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital of Nantong University and conducted in accord with the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from each patient.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article is included within the manuscript.

Abbreviations

AILD: 

autoimmune liver disease

ALD: 

alcoholic liver disease

ALT: 

alanine transaminase

BMI: 

body mass index

CI: 

confidence interval

CMV: 

cytomegalovirus

DM: 

diabetes mellitus

GDM: 

gestational diabetes

HBeAg: 

hepatitis B e antigen

HBsAg: 

hepatitis B surface antigen

HBV: 

Chronic hepatitis B virus

HCV: 

hepatitis C virus

HIV: 

human immunodeficiency virus

HPV: 

human parvovirus

HSV: 

herpes simplex virus

IVF: 

in vitro fertilization

LBW: 

low birth weight

NAFLD: 

nonalcoholic fatty liver diseases

OR: 

odds ratio

PPROM: 

preterm premature rupture of the membranes

RPR: 

rapid plasma reagin test

RV: 

rubella virus

SD: 

standard deviation

SGA: 

small for gestational age

TOX: 

toxoplasma

ULN: 

upper limit of normal

VZV: 

varicella-zoster virus

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all participating women.

Funding

This study was supported in part by grants from the Department of Science and Technology, Jiangsu Province, China (no. BE2015655), the Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 81370520), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China (no. BK2012653), and the Department of Health, Jiangsu Province, China (no. Q201208).

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Obstetrics, The Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital of Nantong University
(2)
Center for Liver Diseases, Nantong Third People’s Hospital, Nantong University
(3)
Department of Clinical Laboratory, The Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital of Nantong University
(4)
Department of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, School of Public Health, Nantong University
(5)
Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Science, Monash University

References

  1. Huang Y, Li L, Sun X, Lu M, Liu H, Tang G, Wang D, Hutin YJ. Screening of pregnant women for hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) and subsequent management, Qiandongnan prefecture, Guizhou, China, 2010. Vaccin. 2013;31 Suppl 9:J62–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Lao TT, Sahota DS, Law LW, Cheng YK, Leung TY. Age-specific prevalence of hepatitis B virus infection in young pregnant women, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of China. Bull World Health Organ. 2014;92(11):782–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Sorrell MF, Belongia EA, Costa J, Gareen IF, Grem JL, Inadomi JM, Kern ER, McHugh JA, Petersen GM, Rein MF et al. National Institutes of Health consensus development conference statement: management of hepatitis B. Hepatol. 2009;49(5 Suppl):S4–S12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Yu M, Jiang Q, Gu X, Ju L, Ji Y, Wu K, Jiang H. Correlation between vertical transmission of hepatitis B virus and the expression of HBsAg in ovarian follicles and placenta. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54246.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Lin X, Guo Y, Zhou A, Zhang Y, Cao J, Yang M, Xiao F, Zhang B, Du Y. Immunoprophylaxis failure against vertical transmission of hepatitis B virus in the Chinese population: a hospital-based study and a meta-analysis. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2014;33(9):897–903.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Pastorek 2nd JG, Miller Jr JM, Summers PR. The effect of hepatitis B antigenemia on pregnancy outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988;158(3 Pt 1):486–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Yue YF, Zhang SL, Li GL. The effect of HBsAg antigenemia on pregnancy. J of Xi’an Med Univ. 1995;7(2):136–8.Google Scholar
  8. Wong S, Chan LY, Yu V, Ho L. Hepatitis B carrier and perinatal outcome in singleton pregnancy. Am J Perinatol. 1999;16(9):485–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Tse KY, Ho LF, Lao T. The impact of maternal HBsAg carrier status on pregnancy outcomes: a case–control study. J Hepatol. 2005;43(5):771–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Saleh-Gargari S, Hantoushzadeh S, Zendehdel N, Jamal A, Aghdam H. The Association of Maternal HBsAg Carrier Status and Perinatal Outcome. Hepat Mon. 2009;9(3):180–4.Google Scholar
  11. Safir A, Levy A, Sikuler E, Sheiner E. Maternal hepatitis B virus or hepatitis C virus carrier status as an independent risk factor for adverse perinatal outcome. Liver Int. 2010;30(5):765–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Elefsiniotis I, Tsoumakas K, Vezali E, Glynou I, Drakoulis N, Saroglou G. Spontaneous preterm birth in women with chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010;110(3):241–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Connell LE, Salihu HM, Salemi JL, August EM, Weldeselasse H, Mbah AK. Maternal hepatitis B and hepatitis C carrier status and perinatal outcomes. Liver Int. 2011;31(8):1163–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Reddick KL, Jhaveri R, Gandhi M, James AH, Swamy GK. Pregnancy outcomes associated with viral hepatitis. J Viral Hepat. 2011;18(7):e394–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Sirilert S, Traisrisilp K, Sirivatanapa P, Tongsong T. Pregnancy outcomes among chronic carriers of hepatitis B virus. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014;126(2):106–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Shen Y, Zhang J, Cai H, Shao JG, Zhang YY, Liu YM, Qin G, Qin Y. Identifying patients with chronic hepatitis B at high risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional study with pair-matched controls. BMC Gastroenterol. 2015;15:32.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Zhu L, Zhang R, Zhang S, Shi W, Yan W, Wang X, Lyu Q, Liu L, Zhou Q, Qiu Q et al. Chinese neonatal birth weight curve for different gestational age. Zhonghua er ke za zhi Chinese J Pediatr. 2015;53(2):97–103.Google Scholar
  18. Xu B, Jarvelin MR, Xu X, Wang Z, Qin H, Rimpela A. Maternal menstrual history and small-for-gestational-age births in a population-based Chinese birth cohort. Early Hum Dev. 1997;49(3):183–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hellerstein S, Feldman S, Duan T. China’s 50 % caesarean delivery rate: is it too high? BJOG. 2015;122(2):160–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. el-Sayed Zaki M, Goda H. Relevance of parvovirus B19, herpes simplex virus 2, and cytomegalovirus virologic markers in maternal serum for diagnosis of unexplained recurrent abortions. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2007;131(6):956–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Konstantinidou A, Anninos H, Spanakis N, Kotsiakis X, Syridou G, Tsakris A, et al. Transplacental infection of Coxsackievirus B3 pathological findings in the fetus. J Med Virol. 2007;79(6):754–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Sauerbrei A, Wutzler P. Varicella-Zoster Virus Infections During Pregnancy: Epidemiology, Clinical Symptoms, Diagnosis, Prevention and Therapy. Curr Pediatr Rev. 2005;1:205–16.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Siegel M, Fuerst HT, Peress NS. Comparative fetal mortality in maternal virus diseases. A prospective study on rubella, measles, mumps, chicken pox and hepatitis. N Engl J Med. 1966;274(14):768–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. McMahon BJ. The natural history of chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Hepatol. 2009;49(5 Suppl):S45–55.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Andreani T. HBV-carriers: When is monitoring and surveillance sufficient? (point of view). Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2011;35(12):813–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Ch’ng CL, Morgan M, Hainsworth I, Kingham JG. Prospective study of liver dysfunction in pregnancy in Southwest Wales. Gut. 2002;51(6):876–80.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Regan L, Braude PR, Trembath PL. Influence of past reproductive performance on risk of spontaneous abortion. BMJ. 1989;299(6698):541–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Bick RL, Madden J, Heller KB, Toofanian A. Recurrent miscarriage: causes, evaluation, and treatment. Medscape Womens Health. 1998;3(3):2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive M. Evaluation and treatment of recurrent pregnancy loss: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(5):1103–11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Thorp Jr JM, Hartmann KE, Shadigian E. Long-term physical and psychological health consequences of induced abortion: review of the evidence. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2003;58(1):67–79.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Cui et al. 2016

Advertisement