Open Access

Erratum to: The DiAMOND trial protocol: A randomised controlled trial of two decision aids for mode of delivery among women with a previous caesarean section [ISRCTN84367722]

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth20066:1

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-6-1

Received: 12 January 2006

Accepted: 12 January 2006

Published: 12 January 2006

The original article was published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2004 4:25

In the economic evaluation section of the protocol [1], we stated that secondary care contacts would be coded according to Healthcare Resource Group (HRG). This has not been possible as HRGs are not routinely recorded in all of the recruiting hospitals, and have proved unreliable among the hospitals that do. Deliveries will instead be coded as 'normal', 'assisted', 'elective caesarean section', or 'emergency caesarean section' according to each patient's hospital record.

A further issue is that the Office of Scottish Health Statistics does not provide cost estimates for different types of delivery. Although costs in Scotland have been estimated using data collected in the early 1990s [2], we consider there to be substantial limitations in applying these costs to the current study. The economic evaluation will therefore apply English costs to the English data, and will investigate in sensitivity analyses the consequences of both applying English costs to, and excluding, the Scottish data.

Notes

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Academic Unit of Primary Health Care, Department of Community Based Medicine, University of Bristol, The Grange

References

  1. Montgomery AA, the DiAMOND study group: The DiAMOND trial protocol: a randomised controlled trial of two decision aids for mode of delivery among women with a previous caesarean section [ISRCTN84367722]. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2004, 4: 25-10.1186/1471-2393-4-25.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Petrou S, Glazener C: The economic costs of alternative modes of delivery during the first two months postpartum: results from a Scottish observational study. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2002, 109: 214-217. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.01032.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/6/1/prepub

Copyright

© Montgomery and the DiAMOND Study Group; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement