Skip to main content

APCR, factor V gene known and novel SNPs and adverse pregnancy outcomes in an Irish cohort of pregnant women



Activated Protein C Resistance (APCR), a poor anticoagulant response of APC in haemostasis, is the commonest heritable thrombophilia. Adverse outcomes during pregnancy have been linked to APCR. This study determined the frequency of APCR, factor V gene known and novel SNPs and adverse outcomes in a group of pregnant women.


Blood samples collected from 907 pregnant women were tested using the Coatest® Classic and Modified functional haematological tests to establish the frequency of APCR. PCR-Restriction Enzyme Analysis (PCR-REA), PCR-DNA probe hybridisation analysis and DNA sequencing were used for molecular screening of known mutations in the factor V gene in subjects determined to have APCR based on the Coatest® Classic and/or Modified functional haematological tests. Glycosylase Mediated Polymorphism Detection (GMPD), a SNP screening technique and DNA sequencing, were used to identify SNPs in the factor V gene of 5 APCR subjects.


Sixteen percent of the study group had an APCR phenotype. Factor V Leiden (FVL), FV Cambridge, and haplotype (H) R2 alleles were identified in this group. Thirty-three SNPs; 9 silent SNPs and 24 missense SNPs, of which 20 SNPs were novel, were identified in the 5 APCR subjects. Adverse pregnancy outcomes were found at a frequency of 35% in the group with APCR based on Classic Coatest® test only and at 45% in the group with APCR based on the Modified Coatest® test. Forty-eight percent of subjects with FVL had adverse outcomes while in the group of subjects with no FVL, adverse outcomes occurred at a frequency of 37%.


Known mutations and novel SNPs in the factor V gene were identified in the study cohort determined to have APCR in pregnancy. Further studies are required to investigate the contribution of these novel SNPs to the APCR phenotype. Adverse outcomes including early pregnancy loss (EPL), preeclampsia (PET) and intrauterine growth restriction (IGUR) were not significantly more frequent in subjects with APCR compared to normal pregnant women however Pregnancy induced hypertension (PIH) was found to be associated with FVL in our study group.

Peer Review reports


APCR produces a thrombophilic state [1, 2]. The combination of inherited thrombophilia and pregnancy greatly increases the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), which remains the commonest cause of maternal death in the developing world [3]. Thrombophilia has been linked to SNPs including Factor V G1691A (FV Leiden) (FVL), FII G20210A and MTHFR-C677T [4, 5]. FVL is the commonest inherited prothrombotic SNP associated with APCR amongst Caucasians [6, 7]. Other SNPs located in the factor V gene have the potential to contribute to the APCR phenotype either independently or found in association with the FVL mutation. These include Cambridge Arg 306, Hong Kong Arg 306, the Arg 679 and the haplotype (H) R2 and R3 polymorphisms [813]. There are conflicting reports as to the association between some of these factor V gene mutations and the APCR phenotype [14, 15]. A number of studies have reported the finding of APCR during pregnancy without an obvious genetic cause [16, 17]. APCR in those cases, referred to as acquired APCR, is one of the mechanisms by which pregnancy induces a prothrombotic state. Acquired APCR in pregnancy is due to decreased levels of Protein S while Factor VIII levels have been reported to have an inverse correlation with APCR in pregnancy [1821].

In this study, we screened pregnant women with APCR for known mutations and haplotypes in the factor V gene. We investigated the factor V gene in selected pregnant women with APCR for novel SNPs using GMPD, a novel mutation detection technology [22]. We determined the frequencies of adverse pregnancy outcomes in subjects with APCR based on the Classic Coatest® test only and in the group with APCR based on the Modified Coatest® test. The association of FVL with EPL, PET, PIH and IUGR was also examined.



Written consent for samples to be collected and ethical approval for the study were obtained from the Research Ethics Committee at the University College Hospital, Galway, (UCHG) and from the 907 pregnant women included in this study attending the antenatal clinic at UCHG. Blood samples (Lithium Heparin and EDTA) were collected from these women who were ranging from 16th to 24th weeks gestation. The second trimester was chosen for the assessment of APC status by Coatest® Classic and Modified functional haematological tests as previous studies had shown that there is little or no variation of the coagulation factors at that stage of pregnancy [23].

Coatest®haematological tests

Blood samples taken from pregnant women were drawn into evacuated anticoagulant tubes (9 volumes of blood into 1 volume of 3.2% (w/v) tri-Sodium Citrate solution). After centrifugation for 15 min at 3000 × g the plasma was stored at -80°C until they were tested using the Coatest® Classic test (Chromogenix), as described by Axelsson [24]. This test measures the ratio of activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) in the presence and absence of exogenous APC. APCR is characterised by a minimal prolongation of the APTT in response to APC and a correspondingly low ratio is determined. APCR was defined as a ratio of less than or equal to 2.1 s and APC normal as greater than 2.1 s. The 2.1 s cut off is the value established in clinical use at the hematology department in UCHG.

Acquired APC resistance tests

Factors V, VIII and IX were determined from the classic and modified APC resistance samples and 50 APC normal samples using a one stage APTT assay on a MDA 180 coagulometer (Organon Teknika, Cambridge, UK), using factor V, VIII and IX deficient plasma's (Diagnostica Stago). Results were expressed as percentage (%) levels. Each run was controlled by the use of a normal (MDA verify1, Biomerieux) and abnormal control (coagulation control A, Technoclone GmbH).

DNA extraction

DNA was extracted from blood samples for all APCR subjects (n = 140) using a modification of the CF(12)m-PCR protocol by Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics, Amersham, UK.

Screening for known thrombophilic mutations

PCR-Restriction enzyme analysis (PCR-REA) was applied to identify: FVL, FV Cambridge, FV Hong Kong mutations and Haplotype (H) R2, R3 alleles in the factor V gene. DNA probe hybridisation analysis and/or DNA sequencing was applied for Arg679 mutation detection. Mutations were screened in duplicate, a PCR negative control and homozygous and heterozygous controls for the different mutations were included in the screening where available. PCR amplification was performed on the GeneAmp PCR System 9600 (Perkin Elmer, USA). PCR-REA reactions were performed as referenced [8, 2528] and all PCR reagents were obtained from Promega (Madison, USA). PCR constituents were made up to a final volume of 100 μl with DNAase/RNAase free water (Sigma Aldrich, UK). Screening for the Arg 679 mutation used primer set Fow 5'TgCCACAATggATTATTgTg'3 and Rev 5'AgAAACgAATTCAgTgCCAT'3 to amplify a 400 bp fragment. PCR reaction was made up to a final volume of 100 μl with DNAase/RNAase free water (Sigma Aldrich, UK). PCR included MgCl2 3.5 mM, 0.2 mM dNTP, in a 1 × PCR reaction buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, 50 mM KCl, 0.1% Triton ×-100), from Promega (Madison, USA). The PCR amplification included 1 cycle of denaturation at 10 min 94°C, a second step of 35 cycles of: 1 min denaturation at 94°C, 1 min at annealing at 57°C and 1 min extension at 72°C, and a third final elongation step at 72°C for 5 min followed by holding at 4°C at the end of the reaction. A combination of 3 DNA hybridisation probes including 2 controls for the wild-type sequence (5'CATggCTACACggAAAATgCATg'3, 5'gTTAACTTCCATgAATTCTAgTCCAAg'3) and a mutant probe (5'gTTAACTTCgATgAATTCTAgTCCAAg'3) were designed from factor V sequence (GenBank Accession number AY364535) to identify mutations in the Arg 679 cleavage site of the factor V gene following amplification with the Arg 679 site primers.

Adverse pregnancy outcomes

An evaluation of the outcomes of pregnancy including; EPL, PET, PIH and IUGR was performed by examination of maternity records at UCHG for the study subjects The criteria for diagnosis were: EPL-any pregnancy loss before 12 weeks gestation (spontaneous abortion or ectopic). PET-BP (Blood pressure) ≥ 140/90 mmHg, +1 proteinuria and oedema. PIH-BP ≥ 140/90 with no proteinuria in accordance with the Official Journal of the International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy. IUGR-is defined as fetal growth of less than 5th percentile for gestational age [29].

Statistical analysis

The Chi-Square test from SPSS version 17.0 software was performed to test if there was a significant difference in the proportion of the different outcomes in the subjects with APCR with only the Classic Coatest® test (n = 105) compared to the subjects with APCR based on the Modified Coatest® test (n = 35). The same statistical analysis was also performed to compare each adverse outcome type in FVL subjects (n = 29) with subjects without FVL (n = 878). Ninety-five percent Confidence intervals (CI) were determined. The Kruskal-Wallis statistical test was applied to compare levels of FV, FVIII and FIX in APCR and APC normal pregnant subjects. P values < 0.05 were considered significant.

Screening for novel thrombophilic mutations by GMPD

Five patients with APCR and 1 APC normal control subject were selected for scanning for SNPs in the factor V gene by glycosylase mediated polymorphism detection (GMPD) analysis. The normal dTTP nucleotide is partially modified by introducing dUTP during PCR amplification for the GMPD. PCR primers (Additional file 1, Table S1) to amplify all 25 exons of factor V gene were designed using the Primer3 program and the factor V sequence GenBank Accession number Z99572. PCR was optimised to determine optimal MgCl2 and annealing temperature conditions for amplification of factor V exons (Additional file 1, Table S1). Primers were synthesised by TIB MOLBIOL, (Germany) with a 5' fluorescent label modification, 6-FAM (6-carboxyfluorescein) on the forward primer and a 5'HEX (hexachlorinated analogue of 6-FAM) modification on the reverse primer to perform GMPD analysis on both strands of the PCR products. PCR reactions were performed in duplicate in 20 μl volume and included approximately 30-50 ng genomic DNA, 1.5 U Taq polymerase, 12.5 pmol of each appropriate labeled PCR primer, MgCl2 concentration as appropriate to the PCR primer set pair (Additional file 1, Table S1) and 0.2 mM of each of dATP, dCTP, dGTP, and 1:60 ratio of dTTP: dUTP in distilled H2O. PCR product (10 μl) was mixed with 1 μl of 0.5 U/μl exonuclease I (New England Biolabs, UK) and incubated at 80°C for 15 min. The exonuclease I treated PCR product mix was purified on an A S300HR clean-up column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, England) following manufacturers instructions. The purified PCR products were incubated at 37°C for 30 min with one microlitre of 0.5 U/μl uracil DNA-glycosylase (New England Biolabs, UK) to cleave the N-glycosidic bond between the base uracil and the sugar deoxyribose in the DNA molecule. This reaction generates an apyrimidinic (AP) site. The AP site was cleaved chemically by adding 1 μl of 0.6 M NaOH (Sigma Chemical, USA) (final concentration of 0.05 M NaOH) to the reaction mix and incubated at 95°C for 15 min. To neutralise the reaction, 1 μl of 0.45 M Tris base (Sigma Chemical, USA) (final concentration of 0.03 M) was added. One microlitre of GeneScan internal standard (ROX-500; PE, Applied Biosystems, USA) was also added to each sample. Prior to analysis by electrophoresis on a 6% PAGE (7 M urea), denaturation of samples was performed by adding 1 μl of deionised formamide (Applied Biosystems, USA) and 2 μl of 50 mg ml-1 blue dextran dye in 25 mM EDTA (Sigma Chemical, USA). The mixture was heated at 95°C for 5 min prior to the run. The ABI PRISM 377 automated DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems, PE, USA) was set at 3 kV/h for 6 h using filter A at 2400 scans/h.

DNA sequencing

PCR products from selected subjects screened for the Arg 679 mutation and PCR products that were identified to contain an SNP by GMPD were sequenced. PCR products were purified using the QIAprep Spin Miniprep Kit (Qiagen Ltd, UK) according to the manufacturers instructions and sent to a commercial sequence service provider (MWG Biotech, Germany) for sequencing.

Analysis of amino acid changes resulting from detected SNPs

The mRNA sequence of factor V (6913 bp nucleotides, GenBank Accession number NM_000130) was translated into its protein product using the internet translation tool at which identified each amino acid and its corresponding codon sequence. The nucleotide and amino acid sequences for each exon were compared with the sequences reported by Jenny et al. (1987). Other sequences were also included to compare the nucleotides and amino acids changes at positions where SNPs were identified in this study, these sequences included the following GenBank Accession numbers: NP_000121, NM_000130, M16967, Z99572 and XM_001575.


Description of study cohort

We determined that 16% (n = 140) of pregnant women tested had APCR, 12% of whom had APCR based on Classic Coatest® test and 4% had APCR with the Classic and Modified Coatest® tests. One subject had APCR with the Modified Coatest® test only. Eighty-nine Classic APCR subjects had no known mutations in the factor V gene. Sixteen subjects had the FV HR2 haplotype. Thirty-four subjects were identified to have APCR based on the Classic and Modified test, 29 of whom had the FVL mutation. One subject with FVL also had the FV Cambridge-G1091C mutation (Table 1).

Measurement of Factor V, Factor VIII and Factor IX in subjects with classic APCR and modified APCR determined the levels of Factor V to be significantly decreased and the levels of Factors VIII and IX to be significantly increased compared to normal pregnant controls.

Table 1 Distribution of known mutations in the Factor V gene

Novel SNPs identified in APCR subjects with Modified Coatest®test and without FVL

We selected five subjects for investigation for novel SNPs in the factor V gene because they had APCR with the Modified Coatest® test and no FVL or other known mutations in the APC cleavage sites of factor V gene. Subject 1, a carrier of (H) R2 allele had 9 SNPs in the factor V gene at nucleotide positions 1216 in exon 8, 2325, 2297/8, 3015, 4038, 4047 and 4648 in exon 13 and 5380 in exon 16; subject 2 had 10 SNPs in the factor V gene at nucleotide positions 1216/7, 1219 and 1226 in exon 8, 1977 in exon 12 and 2904, 3894, 4040/1, 4185 in exon 13; subject 3 had 5 SNPs in the factor V gene at nucleotide positions, 2663, 2684, 2710, 2887 and 4125 in exon 13; subject 4 had 5 SNPs in the factor V gene at nucleotide positions 2127, 2298, 2391 and 2893/4 in exon 13 and subject 5 had 4 SNPs in the factor V gene at nucleotide positions 2863, 2883, 2884/5, in exon 13.

In total, 33 polymorphisms were identified, in 5 cases (2297/8, 1216/7, 2893/4, 2884/5, 4040/1) two SNPs were identified in the same codon. All the SNPs were confirmed in duplicate samples and by comparison to GenBank sequence NM_000130 and other available factor V sequences. Table 2 summarises the SNPs detected by GMPD and identified by DNA sequencing in this study.

Table 2 SNPs identified in the FV gene by GMPD

Adverse outcomes

Table 3 shows the type and number of adverse pregnancy outcomes in subjects with APCR, based on the Classic Coatest® test (n = 105) only, compared to the subjects with APCR based on the Modified Coatest® test (n = 35). Table 3 also shows a comparison of adverse outcomes in FVL subjects (n = 29) with subjects without FVL (n = 878). No significant difference was found in the frequency for EPL, PET or IUGR between the groups compared. However PIH had a significantly higher frequency in subjects with APCR based on the Modified Coatest® test (Chi-Square p value 0.018) compared to subjects with APCR based on the Classic Coatest® test only. PIH frequency was also significantly different (Chi-Square-p value 0.004) in FVL subjects compared to the subjects with no FVL.

Table 3 Adverse obstetric outcomes


Factors that are thought to contribute to APCR in the general population and during pregnancy include defects in the Factor V protein, most frequently caused by the Leiden mutation [1, 30]. Several reports have shown however that between 5-10% of APCR does not involve the FVL and the cause of APCR in these cases is not known [1, 8, 3133]. APCR in these cases may be the result of acquired factors including pregnancy. The frequency of acquired APCR in our study group, indicated by women showing APCR with Classic Coatest® test tested in the second trimester only was 12%. This correlates with various studies showing reduced APC ratios in the Classic Coatest® test during pregnancy [34, 35]. Testing of true APCR status in the study cohort by a second measurement of APC at pre-pregnancy or 8 to 12 weeks post-pregnancy or more frequently during pregnancy was not performed and this is a major limitation of the current study. Mahieu et al. (2007) recently reported an inverse correlation between increasing Factor VIII and decreasing APC sensitivity ratio in second trimester pregnant women. Increasing Factor VIII has been linked to early pregnancy loss [36]. In our study we found the levels of Factors VIII to be significantly increased in APCR subjects compared to normal pregnant controls. Overall FVL frequency in our study group (n = 907) was 3.1% which is slightly lower than the range of 4-7% reported in previous Irish studies [37, 38] but within the range of prevalence of FVL in the general Caucasian population [39]. Six subjects who had APCR with the Modified Coatest® test did not have the FVL suggesting that Coatest® test can give false positive results.

APCR has been considered a risk factor for thrombosis in pregnancy and it has been suggested that pregnant women who have had previous thrombotic events or who have a family history of the FVL mutation should be screened for the FVL mutation [40]. Other mutations in the factor V gene, particularly at the other cleavage sites, Arg 306 and Arg679 of Factor V have the potential to contribute to the APCR phenotype [8, 41]. No mutations have been identified to date at Arg679 in this or other studies [42], Van der Neut Kolfschoten, 2005 (personal communication).

One subject in our APCR cohort had 2 mutations in the factor V gene; FVL and FV Cambridge G1091C, this subject developed PIH during pregnancy. A recent Spanish study identified the FVL and FV Cambridge mutations in a subject with a family history of thrombosis [43].

Haplotypes (H) R2/R3 have also been associated with mild APCR when found in combination with the FVL [12, 15, 42]. In our study, the (H) R2 allele was found in 12% of the APCR cohort. We did not identify the (H) R3 allele mutation in the APCR group which is consistent with published literature [8]. There have been a number of other mutations identified in other studies on the factor V gene however they do not appear to contribute significantly to APCR in Caucasian populations, for example, R485K and I359T [9, 44, 45].

It was previously speculated that APCR may be caused by a novel defect in the factor V molecule [46]. We identified 33 SNPs including 20 novel SNPs in 5 APCR subjects scanned for SNPs by GMPD. A number of the SNPs (nucleotide positions 2663, 2684, 2863, 5380) were identified previously in GenBank sequences of Factor V (NP_000121, NM_000130, M16967, Z99572 or XM_001575). The identification of these SNPs by GMPD validated the SNP scanning technique we used.

Previous studies defined the R2-H1229A haplotype polymorphism as a combination of mutations including, C2298T, T2325C, A2379G, A2391G and A4070G (HR3) in exon 13 and A5380G in exon 16 [11, 12, 47]. In our study, the heterozygous carrier of R2 allele-H1229A was determined to have T2298A, T2325C, and G5380A SNPs. The haplotype (H) R2 has also been linked to altered levels and ratios of Factor V1 and Factor V2 [11, 45]. We also found G2391A SNP, previously associated with the HR2 haplotype, in one subject. Four of the novel SNPs identified in this study are located in exon 8 while most exons have no SNPs identified in this study. This may suggest that Factor V amino acids 348-350 have an association with APCR.

In a study performed by Kostka et al. (2000), the presence of missense mutations in the first 1200 bp of the Exon 13 (B-domain) of the factor V gene was investigated in a group of APCR patients who did not carry the FVL mutation. Four silent mutations, C2298T, T2325C, A2379G, A2391G and four missense mutations; A2540C, A2663G, A2684G, A2863G were identified in patients with thrombosis and normal controls [48]. In our study the SNP T2325C was identified and SNPs at nucleotide positions 2298(T2298A), 2391(G2391A), 2663(G2663A), 2684(G2684A) and 2863(G2863A) were also identified. SNP T3894C identified in our study was also previously identified in a study performed on factor V levels in plasma by Lunghi et al. (1996). Twenty-six of the SNPs identified in this study, were in exon 13 which encodes most of the B domain of the FV protein. This high frequency of SNPs in exon 13 has been previously reported [26, 49]. The large heavily glycosylated B-domain, spanning amino acids 710-1545, was previously reported not to be essential for the cofactor activity of the FV glycoprotein as it is released during the activation of FV [50, 51]. However, other studies have postulated that the B domain may be involved in other coagulation related functions including the proteolytic activation of thrombin. A previous study showed decreased activation of thrombin when the B domain of FV was completely deleted [52]. Kostka et al. (2000) suggested that the B domain of FV is of vital importance in APC cofactor activity in the clotting cascade, and that mutations in this domain may contribute to an ineffective APC response. The C-terminal part of the B-domain (residues 1477-1545) was suggested to be crucial for the APC-cofactor function [53]. It has also been suggested that a region of FV B domain may function in Factor VIII (a) inactivation by APC through the FV-PS-APC system [5456]. Mutations in exon 13 may disrupt the calcium-binding site in the FV protein leading to a loss of the high-affinity (calcium-dependent) interaction of the heavy chain and light chain of FVa potentially influencing the dissociation of the heavy chain and light chain [5759].

Dawood et al. (2007) found significant increased frequency of SNPs in the factor V gene in the women with acquired APCR and recurrent miscarriage in comparison with their control groups [60]. In our study we identified several SNPs in the Modified APCR subjects with no FVL. The finding of 20 novel factor V gene SNPs in these subjects is interesting. These SNPs may have an effect on FV levels rather than directly causing APCR. A future study screening the normal population would be useful to determine if these SNPs are common in the population. It may be that these SNPs are common in Irish people but rarely found in other populations.

The total frequency of adverse outcomes was not significantly different in the group with APCR based on the Modified test compared to the pregnant group with classic APCR, which is consistent with the findings of recent studies [61, 62]. Comparison of the frequency of each adverse outcome individually determined a statistically significant higher prevalence of PIH in subjects with APCR with the Modified Coatest® test and in subjects with FVL compared to subjects with no FVL. Of 48 subjects from the total study cohort with PIH, 3 subjects had PET, two of whom had APCR and only one had FVL. PET in this cohort is associated with changes to coagulation system other than those caused by FVL. FVL was significantly associated with PIH in a German study investigating 70 women with severe PIH, 15 of whom had PET [63]. In contrast, a study of 100 pregnant women with PIH in Turkey did not find a significant association between FVL and PIH [64]. Discrepancies as to the association of adverse outcomes with FVL can be a consequence of study size, presence of additional thrombophilic factors, different study design and methodology or differences in the genetic population studied [65, 66].


PIH appeared to be associated with FVL whereas no association was found between FVL and EPL, PET or IUGR in our pregnant study group. We identified 6 pregnant women with APCR without FVL in our modified APCR group. Further studies are required to investigate the contribution of novel SNPs identified in this study to the APCR phenotype.


  1. 1.

    Bertina RM, Koeleman BP, Koster T, Rosendaal FR, Dirven RJ, de Ronde H, Velden van der PA, Reitsma PH: Mutation in blood coagulation factor V associated with resistance to activated protein C. Nature. 1994, 369: 64-67. 10.1038/369064a0.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Dahlback B: Resistance to activated protein C due to factor V R506Q mutation as a cause of venous thrombosis. Rev Invest Clin. 1997, 49 (Suppl 1): 3-5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Martinelli I: Risk factors in venous thromboembolism. Thromb Haemost. 2001, 86: 395-403.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Kupferminc MJ, Eldor A, Steinman N, Many A, Bar-Am A, Jaffa A, Fait G, Lessing JB: Increased frequency of genetic thrombophilia in women with complications of pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 1999, 340: 9-13. 10.1056/NEJM199901073400102.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Dordevic V, Rakicevic L, Spasic M, Mikovic D, Kovac M, Radojkovic D: [Factor V Leiden, FII G20210A, MTHFR C677T mutations as risk factors for venous thrombosis during pregnancy and puerperium]. Vojnosanit Pregl. 2005, 62: 201-205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Dahlback B, Carlsson M, Svensson PJ: Familial thrombophilia due to a previously unrecognized mechanism characterized by poor anticoagulant response to activated protein C: prediction of a cofactor to activated protein C. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993, 90: 1004-1008. 10.1073/pnas.90.3.1004.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Voorberg J, Roelse J, Koopman R, Buller H, Berends F, ten Cate JW, Mertens K, van Mourik JA: Association of idiopathic venous thromboembolism with single point-mutation at Arg506 of factor V. Lancet. 1994, 343: 1535-1536. 10.1016/S0140-6736(94)92939-4.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Williamson D, Brown K, Luddington R, Baglin C, Baglin T: Factor V Cambridge: a new mutation (Arg306-->Thr) associated with resistance to activated protein C. Blood. 1998, 91: 1140-1144.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Chan WP, Lee CK, Kwong YL, Lam CK, Liang R: A novel mutation of Arg306 of factor V gene in Hong Kong Chinese. Blood. 1998, 91: 1135-1139.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Dahlback B: Inherited resistance to activated protein C, a major cause of venous thrombosis, is due to a mutation in the factor V gene. Haemostasis. 1994, 24: 139-151.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Lunghi B, Iacoviello L, Gemmati D, Dilasio MG, Castoldi E, Pinotti M, Castaman G, Redaelli R, Mariani G, Marchetti G, Bernardi F: Detection of new polymorphic markers in the factor V gene: association with factor V levels in plasma. Thromb Haemost. 1996, 75: 45-48.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Bernardi F, Faioni EM, Castoldi E, Lunghi B, Castaman G, Sacchi E, Mannucci PM: A factor V genetic component differing from factor V R506Q contributes to the activated protein C resistance phenotype. Blood. 1997, 90: 1552-1557.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Jenny RJ, Pittman DD, Toole JJ, Kriz RW, Aldape RA, Hewick RM, Kaufman RJ, Mann KG: Complete cDNA and derived amino acid sequence of human factor V. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1987, 84: 4846-4850. 10.1073/pnas.84.14.4846.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Zoller B, Svensson PJ, He X, Dahlback B: Identification of the same factor V gene mutation in 47 out of 50 thrombosis-prone families with inherited resistance to activated protein C. J Clin Invest. 1994, 94: 2521-2524. 10.1172/JCI117623.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Hoekema L, Castoldi E, Tans G, Girelli D, Gemmati D, Bernardi F, Rosing J: Functional properties of factor V and factor Va encoded by the R2-gene. Thromb Haemost. 2001, 85: 75-81.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Schlit AF, Col-De Beys C, Moriau M, Lavenne-Pardonge E: Acquired activated protein C resistance in pregnancy. Thromb Res. 1996, 84: 203-206. 10.1016/0049-3848(96)00177-6.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Osama MH, Justin C: The one-stop recurrent miscarriage clinic: an evaluation of its effectiveness and outcome. Human Reproduction. 2004, 19 (12): 2952-2958. 10.1093/humrep/deh532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Sugiura M: Pregnancy and delivery in protein C-deficiency. Curr Drug Targets. 2005, 6: 577-583. 10.2174/1389450054545971.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Benedetto C, Marozio L, Tavella AM, Maula V, Carmignani D, Curti A: Response to activated protein C decreases throughout pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2002, 81: 1028-1032.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Mahieu B, Jacobs N, Mahieu S, Naelaerts K, Vertessen F, Weyler J, Jacquemyn Y, Planken Van der M: Haemostiatic changes and acquired activated protein C resistance in normal pregnancy. Blood Coagulation and Fibrinolysis. 2007, 18: 685-688. 10.1097/MBC.0b013e3282f09835.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Mahieu B, Jacobs N, Mahieu S, Naelaerts K, Vertessen F, Weyler J, Jacquemyn Y, Planken Van der M: Haemostiatic changes and acquired activated protein C resistance in normal pregnancy. Blood Coagulation and Fibrinolysis. 2007, 18: 685-688. 10.1097/MBC.0b013e3282f09835.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Devaney J, Glennon M, Farrell G, Ruttledge M, Smith T, Houghton JA, Maher M: Cystic fibrosis mutation frequencies in an Irish population. Clin Genet. 2003, 63: 121-125. 10.1034/j.1399-0004.2003.00017.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Walker MC, Garner PR, Keely EJ, Rock GA, Reis MD: Changes in activated protein C resistance during normal pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997, 177: 162-169. 10.1016/S0002-9378(97)70456-3.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Axelsson F, Rosen S: APC resistance. Chromogenix AB; Product Monograph 1997 Version 2.1. 1997

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Ridker PM, Hennekens CH, Lindpaintner K, Stampfer MJ, Eisenberg PR, Miletich JP: Mutation in the gene coding for coagulation factor V and the risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, and venous thrombosis in apparently healthy men. N Engl J Med. 1995, 332: 912-917. 10.1056/NEJM199504063321403.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Lunghi B, Castoldi E, Mingozzi F, Bernardi F: A new factor V gene polymorphism (His 1254 Arg) present in subjects of african origin mimics the R2 polymorphism (His 1299 Arg). Blood. 1998, 91: 364-365.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Poort SR, Rosendaal FR, Reitsma PH, Bertina RM: A common genetic variation in the 3'-untranslated region of the prothrombin gene is associated with elevated plasma prothrombin levels and an increase in venous thrombosis. Blood. 1996, 88: 3698-3703.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Peng F, Labelle LA, Rainey BJ, Tsongalis GJ: Single nucleotide polymorphisms in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene are common in US Caucasian and Hispanic American populations. Int J Mol Med. 2001, 8: 509-511.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Bamberg C, Kalache KD: Prenatal diagnosis of fetal growth restriction. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2004, 9: 387-394. 10.1016/j.siny.2004.03.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Dahlback B, Hildebrand B: Inherited resistance to activated protein C is corrected by anticoagulant cofactor activity found to be a property of factor V. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994, 91: 1396-1400. 10.1073/pnas.91.4.1396.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Griffin JH, Heeb MJ, Kojima Y, Fernandez JA, Kojima K, Hackeng TM, Greengard JS: Activated protein C resistance: molecular mechanisms. Thromb Haemost. 1995, 74: 444-448.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Bertina RM, Reitsma PH, Rosendaal FR, Vandenbroucke JP: Resistance to activated protein C and factor V Leiden as risk factors for venous thrombosis. Thromb Haemost. 1995, 74: 449-453.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Siegert G, Gehrish S, Schellong S, Schwarz T, Runge E, Lüthke K: Decreased APC-response in patients lacking factor V-Leiden-Laboratory diagnostic and clinical relevance. Thromb Haemost Suppl. 1997, 317-318.

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Clark P, Sattar N, Walker I, Greer I: The Glasgow outcome, APCR and lipid (GOAL) pregnancy study: significance of pregnancy - associated activated protein C resistance. Thromb Haemostasis. 2001, 85: 30-35.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Kjellberg H, Andersson M, Rosen S, Tengorn L, Hellgren M: APC Resistance and other Haemostatic variables during pregnancy and Puerperium. Thromb Haemost. 1999, 81: 527-531.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Dossenbach-Glaninger A, Von Trotsemburger M, Krugluger W, Dossenbach M, Oberkanins C, Huber J, Hopmeier P: Elevated coagulation factor VIII and the risk for recurrent early pregnancy loss. Thromb Haemost. 2004, 91: 694-699.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Vaughan J, Power C, Nolan C, McCarthy D, Shirley I: The incidence of factor V Leiden in a normal Irish population and its relationship to the laboratory diagnosis of APC resistance. Letter;Thromb Haemost. 1999, 81 (4): 661-3.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Livingstone WJ, Keenan C, White B, Mynett-Johnson L, Lawler M, Mayne P, Smith OP: Prevalence of the factor VR506Q mutation in two Irish control populations: use of a novel nested polymerase chain reaction approach. Br J Haematol. 2000, 111: 559-561. 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2000.02371.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Pelle GL, Björn D: Carriership of Factor V Leiden and Evolutionary Selection Advantage. Current Medicinal Chemistry. 2008, 15: 1541-1544. 10.2174/092986708784638852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Harvey D, Lowe GM: Factor V Leiden: association with venous thromboembolism in pregnancy and screening issues. Br J Biomed Sci. 2004, 61: 157-164.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Chan LC, Bourke C, Lam CK, Liu HW, Brookes S, Jenkins V, Pasi J: Lack of activated protein C resistance in healthy Hong Kong Chinese blood donors--correlation with absence of Arg506-Gln mutation of factor V gene. Thromb Haemost. 1996, 75: 522-523.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Castaman G, Ruggeri M, Tosetto A, Rodeghiero F: Heterogeneity of activated protein C resistance phenotype in subjects with compound heterozygosity for HR2 haplotype and FV Leiden mutation (R506Q) in factor V gene. Thromb Haemost. 2000, 84: 357-358.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Santamaria A, Soria JM, Tirado I, Mateo J, Coll I, Souto JC, Fontcuberta J: Double heterozygosity for Factor V Leiden and Factor V Cambridge mutations associated with low levels of activated protein C resistance in a Spanish thrombophilic family. Thromb Haemost. 2005, 93: 1193-1195.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Gandrille S, Greengard JS, Alhenc-Gelas M, Juhan-Vague I, Abgrall JF, Jude B, Griffin JH, Aiach M: Incidence of activated protein C resistance caused by the ARG 506 GLN mutation in factor V in 113 unrelated symptomatic protein C-deficient patients. The French Network on the behalf of INSERM. Blood. 1995, 86: 219-224.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    De Visser MC, Guasch JF, Kamphuisen PW, Vos HL, Rosendaal FR, Bertina RM: The HR2 haplotype of factor V: effects on factor V levels, normalised activated protein C sensitivity ratios and the risk of venous thrombosis. Thromb Haemost. 2000, 83: 577-582.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Clark P, Brennand J, Conkie JA, McCall F, Greer IA, Walker ID: Activated protein C sensitivity, protein C, protein S and coagulation in normal pregnancy. Thromb Haemost. 1998, 79: 1166-1170.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Bayston TA, Ireland H, Olds RJ, Thein SL, Lane DA: A polymorphism in the human coagulation factor V gene. Hum Mol Genet. 1994, 3: 2085-

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Kostka H, Siegert G, Schwarz T, Gehrisch S, Kuhlisch E, Schellong S, Jaross W: Frequency of polymorphisms in the B-domain of factor V gene in APC-resistant patients. Thromb Res. 2000, 99: 539-547. 10.1016/S0049-3848(00)00283-8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    van Wijk R, Nieuwenhuis K, Berg van den M, Huizinga EG, Meijden van der BB, Kraaijenhagen RJ, van Solinge WW: Five novel mutations in the gene for human blood coagulation factor V associated with type I factor V deficiency. Blood. 2001, 98: 358-367. 10.1182/blood.V98.2.358.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Esmon CT: The subunit structure of thrombin-activated factor V. Isolation of activated factor V, separation of subunits, and reconstitution of biological activity. J Biol Chem. 1979, 254: 964-973.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Kane WH, Devore-Carter D, Ortel TL: Expression and characterization of recombinant human factor V and a mutant lacking a major portion of the connecting region. Biochemistry. 1990, 29: 6762-6768. 10.1021/bi00481a003.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Toole JJ, Pittman DD, Orr EC, Murtha P, Wasley LC, Kaufman RJ: A large region (approximately equal to 95 kDa) of human factor VIII is dispensable for in vitro procoagulant activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1986, 83: 5939-5942. 10.1073/pnas.83.16.5939.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Thorelli E, Kaufman RJ, Dahlback B: The C-terminal Region of the Factor V B-domain Is Crucial for the Anticoagulant Activity of Factor V. J Biol Chem. 1998, 273: 16140-16145. 10.1074/jbc.273.26.16140.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Shen L, Dahlback B: Factor V and protein S as synergistic cofactors to activated protein C in degradation of factor VIIIa. J Biol Chem. 1994, 269: 18735-18738.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Lu D, Kalafatis M, Mann KG, Long GL: Comparison of activated protein C/protein S-mediated inactivation of human factor VIII and factor V. Blood. 1996, 87: 4708-4717.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Varadi K, Rosing J, Tans G, Pabinger I, Keil B, Schwarz HP: Factor V enhances the cofactor function of protein S in the APC-mediated inactivation of factor VIII: influence of the factor VR506Q mutation. Thromb Haemost. 1996, 76: 208-214.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Sorensen KW, Nicolaes GA, Villoutreix BO, Yamazaki T, Tans G, Rosing J, Dahlback B: Functional properties of recombinant factor V mutated in a potential calcium-binding site. Biochemistry. 2004, 43: 5803-5810. 10.1021/bi0361362.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Kalafatis M, Rand MD, Mann KG: Factor Va-membrane interaction is mediated by two regions located on the light chain of the cofactor. Biochemistry. 1994, 33: 486-493. 10.1021/bi00168a013.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Kalafatis M, Xue J, Lawler CM, Mann KG: Contribution of the heavy and light chains of factor Va to the interaction with factor Xa. Biochemistry. 1994, 33: 6538-6545. 10.1021/bi00187a022.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Dawood F, Mountford R, Farquharson R, Quenby S: Genetic polymorphisms on the factor V gene in women with recurrent miscarriage and acquired APCR. Hum Reprod. 2007, 22: 2546-2553. 10.1093/humrep/dem210.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Dizon-Townson DS, Miller DM, Sibai B, Spong CY, Thom E, Wendel GJ, Wensreom K, Samuels P, Xotroneo MA, Moawad A, Sorodin Y, Meis P, Miodovnik M, O'Sulivan MJ, Conway D, Wapner RJ, Gabbe SG: The relationshep of the factor V Leiden mutation and pregnancy outcomes for mother and fetus. Obstet Gynecol. 2005, 106: 517-524.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Robertson L, Wu O, Langhorne L, Twaddle S, Clak P, Lowe GD, Walker ID, Greaves M, Brenkel L, Regan L, Greer IA: Thrombophilia in pregnancy: a systematic review. Br J Hematol. 2006, 132: 171-196. 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05847.x.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Horstkamp BS, Kiess H, Krämer J, Riess H, W H, Dudenhausen JW: Activated protein C resistance shows an association with pregnancy-induced hypertension. Hum Reprod. 1999, 14: 3112-3115. 10.1093/humrep/14.12.3112.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Demir S, Evruke C, Ozgunen T, Kadayifci O, Altintas U, Kokangul S: The relationship between pregnancy induced hypertension and congenital thrombophilia. SMJ. 2006, 27: 1161-1166.

    Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Tranquilli A, Giannubilo S, Dell'Uomo B, Grandone E: Adverse pregnancy outcomes are associated with multiple maternal thrombophilic factors. EJOG. 2004, 117: 144-147.

    Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Weintraub A, Fernanda Press F, Arnon Wiznitzer A, Sheiner E: Maternal thrombophilia and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Expet Rev Obstet Gyneco. 2007, 2: 203-216. 10.1586/17474108.2.2.203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Pre-publication history

  1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:

Download references


This work was supported by the Irish Health Research Board. The authors gratefully acknowledge the pregnant women who consented to be involved in the study and the midwives from the labour ward at the UCHG. I wish to express my gratitude also to Dr. D. Mongan, UCH Galway, for providing the information on adverse outcomes of the subjects included in the study. Thanks to the Dr. E. Timmins for providing technical support for GMPD scanning.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sara Sedano-Balbás.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

SSB: Contributed to the overall study design, in particular the design of experiments required to undertake the study as well as their performance. SSB took the lead in writing this manuscript. ML: Determined the APC ratio from the pregnant women included in the study using the functional haematological tests; Coatest® Classic and Modified tests at University College Hospital Galway (UCHG). He also measured levels of factors V, VIII and IX in the APCR group and provided discussion and support to the manuscript preparation. BC: Provided oversight to the tests performed at UCHG for the study and discussion and interpretation of the results of the study. MM: Contributed to the overall design of the study and made her lab facilities and personnel at UCHG available to participate in the study. GG: Organised the ethical approval for the study and the sample collection for the study. She contributed to the study design and analysis of the scientific results of the study. MMah: Contributed to the overall study design, the organisation and execution of the planned experiments. She supervised and contributed to the preparation of this manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Electronic supplementary material

Primers used for GMPD

Additional file 1: . PCR primers for the GMPD to amplify all 25 exons of factor V gene. These were designed using the Primer3 program and the factor V sequence GenBank Accession number Z99572A. (DOCX 24 KB)

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sedano-Balbás, S., Lyons, M., Cleary, B. et al. APCR, factor V gene known and novel SNPs and adverse pregnancy outcomes in an Irish cohort of pregnant women. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 10, 11 (2010).

Download citation


  • Factor Versus
  • Activate Partial Thromboplastin Time
  • Adverse Pregnancy Outcome
  • Pregnancy Induce Hypertension
  • Factor Versus Leiden