Skip to main content
Download PDF

First trimester maternal serum PAPP-A and free β-hCG levels and risk of SGA or LGA in women with and without GDM

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth volume 24, Article number: 580 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Maternal gestational diabetes (GDM), small (SGA) and large (LGA) for gestational age neonates are associated with increased morbidity in both mother and child. We studied how different levels of first trimester pregnancy associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) and free beta human chorionic gonadotropin (fβ-hCG) were associated with SGA and LGA in GDM pregnancies and controls.

Methods

Altogether 23 482 women with singleton pregnancies participated in first trimester combined screening and delivered between 2014 and 2018 in Northern Finland and were included in this retrospective case-control study. Women with GDM (n = 4697) and controls without GDM (n = 18 492) were divided into groups below 5th and 10th or above 90th and 95th percentile (pc) PAPP-A and fβ-hCG MoM levels. SGA was defined as a birthweight more than two standard deviations (SD) below and LGA more than two SDs above the sex-specific and gestational age-specific reference mean. Odds ratios were adjusted (aOR) for maternal age, BMI, ethnicity, IVF/ICSI, parity and smoking.

Results

In pregnancies with GDM the proportion of SGA was 2.6% and LGA 4.5%, compared to 3.3% (p = 0.011) and 1.8% (p < 0.001) in the control group, respectively. In ≤ 5th and ≤ 10th pc PAPP-A groups, aORs for SGA were 2.7 (95% CI 1.5–4.7) and 2.2 (95% CI 1.4–3.5) in the GDM group and 3.8 (95% CI 3.0–4.9) and 2.8 (95% CI 2.3–3.5) in the reference group, respectively. When considering LGA, there was no difference in aORs in any high PAPP-A groups. In the low ≤ 5 percentile fβ-hCG MoM group, aORs for SGA was 2.3 (95% CI 1.8–3.1) in the control group. In fβ-hCG groups with GDM there was no association with SGA and the only significant difference was ≥ 90 percentile group, aOR 1.6 (95% CI 1.1–2.5) for LGA.

Conclusion

Association with low PAPP-A and SGA seems to be present despite GDM status. High PAPP-A levels are not associated with increased LGA risk in women with or without GDM. Low fβ-hCG levels are associated with SGA only in non-GDM pregnancies.

Peer Review reports

Background

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is defined as the onset of glucose intolerance that is identified for the first-time during pregnancy [1]. GDM is associated with increased risks for the mother and the newborn, including pre-eclampsia, premature delivery, large for gestational age (LGA) birthweight, shoulder dystocia and birth trauma, increased risk for caesarean section and neonatal morbidity [2]. In the long term, the mother is at increased risk for recurrent GDM, subsequent type 2 diabetes, metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular diseases [3,4,5]. Antenatal predisposing to maternal GDM is associated with subsequent impaired glucose intolerance and obesity [3, 6].

Pregnancy associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) is an insulin-like growth factor binding protein protease (IGFBP) with an important role in fetal growth and development [7]. Low level of PAPP-A is an indicator of placental pathogenesis and has been associated with several pregnancy complications such as chromosomal abnormalities, preeclampsia, and small for gestational age (SGA) newborns [8]. The association of PAPP-A with metabolic diseases, such as GDM, has also been found; in some earlier studies, low PAPP-A values have been associated with GDM, [9,10,11,12,13,14,15] but not in all [16,17,18,19]. The role of PAPP-A in the prediction of GDM seems questionable [11, 12, 20, 21]. Low PAPP-A MoM is a risk factor for SGA, [8, 22, 23] whereas high PAPP-A MoM is a protective factor for SGA and was also associated with LGA in earlier studies [24,25,26]. High PAPP-A has been found to predict LGA [10]. The role of PAPP-A seems not to be restricted only to pregnancy as low first trimester PAPP-A levels have also been associated with the risk of development of metabolic and cardiovascular diseases such as diabetes later in life in mothers and short stature in offspring [27].

Free β-human chorionic gonadotropin (fβ-hCG) is produced by trophoblasts and is a pregnancy-specific hormone that regulates placental development, uterine and fetal growth [28]. Together with PAPP-A, fβ-hCG is measured from maternal serum in the first trimester as part of combined screening program for chromosomal abnormalities as fβ-hCG values are increased in trisomy 21 pregnancies and decreased in trisomy 18 and 13 pregnancies [29]. Low fβ-hCG concentration is associated with low birthweight, preterm birth and low Apgar scores [23, 30,31,32]. Previous studies have reported contradictory results on the association between high MoM levels of fβ-hCG and SGA. The high fβ-hCG MoM levels seemed to be a protective factor for GDM and preterm birth in previous studies [32,33,34,35].

First trimester maternal serum markers PAPP-A and fβ-hCG have been shown to be associated with several pregnancy complications that affect fetal weight. The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of abnormal maternal serum biochemistry in fetal growth in GDM and non-GDM pregnancies. This is interesting as low PAPP-A is associated with the risk of SGA newborns but also with the risk of GDM which on the contrary is associated with LGA newborns. Our hypothesis in this study was that gestational diabetes would affect fetal growth more than abnormal first trimester biochemistry. Our primary aim was to determine whether low PAPP-A MoM in women with GDM is associated with an increased risk of SGA or LGA. We also investigated whether high PAPP-A MoM levels as such are associated with LGA. Furthermore, we examined the association between fβ-hCG MoM levels and the risk of SGA and LGA in pregnancies with or without GDM.

Materials and methods

This was a retrospective case-control study that comprised 23 482 women with singleton pregnancies. Women voluntarily attended the first trimester combined screening in the Oulu University Hospital region and delivered between January 1st, 2014, and December 31st, 2018, in delivery units in Finland. The national screening program was performed according to the guidelines of the Finnish Ministry of Social Affairs and Health. The Finnish Medical Birth Register (MBR), which includes the data on all births of liveborn and stillborn infants ≥ 22 + 0 gestational weeks (gw) or ≥ 500 g in Finland, was utilized for data on all pregnancy outcomes. Pregnancies with results of termination or miscarriage were not included. Also, pregnancies with trisomy 21 (ICD-10 code Q90 n = 11), 18 and 13 (ICD-10 code Q91 n = 2) were excluded from the data.

The measurements of maternal serum PAPP-A and fβ-hCG levels were made between gw 9 + 0 and 13 + 6 and quantitated with time-resolved immunofluorometric assays on an automatic immunoanalyzer (AutoDELFIA®, PerkinElmer Wallac, Finland) at an accredited Nordlab laboratory (Oulu, Finland). The results were given as multiple of medians (MoM). [36] Pregnancy associated plasma protein-A MoM values were adjusted with gestational age, maternal age and weight, smoking status, ethnicity (Caucasian, Asian, Afro-Caribbean, Oriental and other) and diabetes. Nuchal translucency (NT) was measured by a trained sonographer or a specialist doctor of obstetrics and gynecology between gw 11 + 0 and 13 + 6. The Fetal Medicine Foundation protocol was used for NT measurements [37]. Gestational age was confirmed with ultrasound. It was corrected if fetal crown-rump length (CRL) differed from the assumed gestational age by five days or more.

Maternal age was defined as the mother’s age at the first antenatal visit. Maternal body mass index (BMI) was calculated as the mother’s pre-pregnancy weight divided by the square of her height (kg/m2). Any smoking occurring during the pregnancy was defined as smoking. Data were obtained from screening data and MBR.

The 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was routinely performed in all pregnancies between the 24th and 28th gw. However, exceptions were made for primiparas under 25 years of age with normal weight (BMI 18.5–24.9 kg/m2) and no family history of type 2 diabetes, as well as multiparas under 40 years of age with normal weight (BMI under 25 kg/m2) and no previous instances of GDM or LGA babies. In high-risk populations (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2, prior GDM, family history of type 2 diabetes, polycystic ovary syndrome, glucosuria in early pregnancy, oral corticosteroid medication) OGTT was performed already between the 12th and 16th gw [38]. If the early OGTT was normal, it was re-tested between the 24th and 28th gw. The test was considered abnormal if glucose concentrations in OGTT were in venous plasma after a 12-hour overnight fast ≥ 5.3 mmol/l, at 1 h ≥ 10.0 mmol/l and 2 hours ≥ 8.6 mmol/l after the glucose load. The diagnosis of GDM was set after one or several abnormal glucose concentrations. In the present study the diagnosis of GDM was based on an abnormal OGTT result and/or ICD-10 codes O24.4 and/or O24.9 according to MBR. Every woman gets lifestyle counseling (weight gain, nutrition, physical exercise, and blood pressure recommendations) during pregnancy from the primary health care on their first antenatal visit. Weight gain recommendations are based on guidelines of Institute of Medicine [39]. If a woman is diagnosed GDM, she will have diabetic nutritional recommendations and counseling from primary health care according to national guidelines (Finnish Current Care Guidelines of Gestational Diabetes) [38]. These instructions follow the general nutrition recommendations during pregnancy and nutritional treatment recommendations for diabetes. After the GDM diagnosis and counseling, women began glucose self-monitoring. Medical treatment (insulin and/or metformin) was considered if plasma glucose concentrations, despite detailed dietary counseling, repeatedly exceeded the target levels (< 5.5 mmol/L fasting, < 7.8 mmol/L 1 h postprandial) [38, 40].

The control population was defined as participants with no diagnosis of GDM. Women with pre-pregnancy diabetes (type 1 or type 2, ICD-10 codes E10, E11, O24.0, and/or O24.1) were excluded (n = 223). Four cases were excluded because of missing data and 11 because insulin was started during pregnancy without a diagnosis of GDM, diabetes type 1 or type 2 according to MBR. The flow chart describes the inclusion and exclusion of participants (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Study flow chart

Full size image

According to the International Societies of Pediatric Endocrinology and the Growth Hormone Research Society small for gestational age (SGA) was defined as a birthweight more than two standard deviations (SDs) below and large for gestational age (LGA) more than two SDs above the sex-specific and gestational age-specific reference mean [41]. Appropriate for gestational age (AGA) was used as a reference value. Data to define SGA, AGA and LGA were missing in 42 pregnancies, and therefore those cases were excluded from the study.

Women with GDM and controls were divided into groups according to PAPP-A and fβ-hCG MoM values. Limits of ≤ 5th percentile (pc), ≤ 10th pc, ≥ 90th pc and ≥ 95th pc were used as grouping values.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was made with IBM SPSS Statistics 28. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Continuous variables were compared using a t-test or Mann-Whitney U-test and categorical variables with the Chi-square test. Logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Odds ratios were adjusted (aOR) for maternal age, BMI, smoking, parity, ethnicity (two categories, Caucasian and other), and in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).

Results

The analysis included a total of 4697 individuals with GDM and 18 492 controls who met the eligibility criteria. Women with GDM were older, had higher pre-pregnancy BMI, were more often multiparous, smoked more frequently during pregnancy and had more often pre-eclampsia than controls (Table 1). In the GDM group, 7.4% of women commenced insulin therapy during pregnancy. Median values of PAPP-A and fβ-hCG MoM were 1.03 and 0.95 in women with GDM and 1.11 (p < 0.001) and 0.98 (p < 0.001) in controls, respectively. There were statistical differences in the rates of SGA infants (2.6% vs. 3.3% p = 0.011), LGA infants (4.5% vs. 1.8% p < 0.001), and mean birthweights (3573 g vs. 3488 g, p < 0.001) between the GDM and control groups, respectively.

Table 1 Maternal characteristics and the perinatal outcomes
Full size table

In the low PAPP-A MoM ≤ 5th pc group, the proportion of SGA infants was higher compared to the > 5th pc group, in both the GDM group (5.7% vs. 2.4%, p < 0.001) and the control group (10.1% vs. 3.0%, p < 0.001) (Table 2). Similar patterns were observed in the ≤ 10th pc and > 10th pc groups. No significant variances in the occurrence of LGA infants were observed about elevated PAPP-A MoM levels, either within the GDM or the control group. Association with SGA and LGA in different PAPP-A MoM levels in the overall population was represented in Supplementary Table 1.

Table 2 SGA, AGA and LGA together and separately associations with PAPP-A MoM levels within GDM and control groups
Full size table

In the control group, a low fβ-hCG MoM level of ≤ 5th pc was associated with a higher prevalence of SGA infants compared to the > 5th pc group (7.3% vs. 3.1%, p < 0.001). Similar findings were observed in the ≤ 10th pc and > 10th pc groups, with rates of 6.0% vs. 3.0% (p < 0.001), respectively. However, these differences were statistically insignificant in the GDM group (Table 3). In the GDM group, a high fβ-hCG MoM level ≥ 90th percentile was associated with a higher prevalence of LGA infants compared to < 90th pc (6.6% vs. 4.3%, p = 0.031), but there was no difference in GDM groups with different cutoffs.

Table 3 SGA, AGA and LGA association together and separately with fβ-hCG MoM levels within the GDM and control groups
Full size table

In the low PAPP-A MoM ≤ 5th pc group, the adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for SGA infants were 2.7 (95% CI 1.5–4.7) in the GDM group and 3.8 (95% CI 3.0–4.9) in the control group (Table 4). In the low PAPP-A MoM ≤ 10th pc group, the aOR for the GDM was 2.2 (95% CI 1.4–3.5), and in the control group, it was 2.8 (95% CI 2.3–3.5). The only differences in the aOR for LGA infants in PAPP-A MoM groups were in the low PAPP-A ≤ 10th pc group, where the aOR for LGA was 0.5 (95% CI 0.3–0.9) in the GDM and 0.5 (95% CI 0.3–0.8) in the control group. OR for SGA and LGA in different PAPP-A MoM levels and overall, with GDM was represented in Supplementary Table 2.

Table 4 Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for SGA and LGA in different PAPP-A and fβ-hCG groups
Full size table

In the control group, the aORs for SGA infants in ≤ 5th and ≤ 10th pc fβ-hCG MoM groups were 2.3 (95% CI 1.8–3.1) and 2.0 (95% CI 1.6–2.5), respectively. There were no statistical differences according to low fβ-hCG in the GDM group. In the GDM group, the high fβ-hCG MoM group with ≥ 90th pc had an aOR of 1.6 (95% CI 1.1–2.5) for LGA infants, but no statistically significant differences were observed in other groups or levels.

Discussion

This was the first population-based study that showed low PAPP-A MoM levels associated with an increased risk of SGA infants both in GDM and non-GDM pregnancies. However, this association was not as notable in the GDM group as in the control group. High PAPP-A MoM levels, instead, showed no association with LGA infants, regardless of the presence of GDM. Low fβ-hCG MoM levels were significantly associated with SGA infants only in the control group.

Previous studies have consistently identified low PAPP-A MoM levels as a risk factor for SGA, which aligns with the findings of this study [22, 23, 25, 42, 43]. Our study further extends this finding in women with GDM, although the risk appears to be lower than in the non-GDM group (Supplementary Table 2). Notably, this is the first study to establish this association in GDM patients. Additionally, our findings suggest that low PAPP-A levels have a greater impact on fetal growth than potentially abnormal maternal glucose metabolism, even though this was not possible to evaluate further in this study. Maternal weight gain during pregnancy is also a factor in fetal weight development, however, in an earlier study there was no difference in gestational weight gain between low and normal PAPP-A study groups [15]. In our study, we unfortunately had no information on women’s weight gain during pregnancy. The association between low PAPP-A and SGA in women with GDM should be considered despite GDM is usually associated with the risk of LGA [2, 9]. Our results overall are consistent with the association between low PAPP-A MoM and lower birthweight compared to normal PAPP-A levels [8]. The pathway through which PAPP-A affects fetal growth may be through its role as an enzyme degrading IGFBPs-4 and − 5 which are mitogenic and antiapoptotic endocrine factors essential to placental function and fetal growth. Moreover, it has been suggested that PAPP-A levels may have further impact on the growth of the offspring also after birth [27].

Earlier study has shown the correlation between PAPP-A levels and birthweight [44]. It can be hypothesized that high PAPP-A values could lead to increased growth. In our study, elevated PAPP-A MoM levels were not associated with LGA. However, previous studies have reported contrary results [24, 26, 45, 46]. Wells et al. found a positive association between PAPP-A MoM and birthweight. In their study, the highest quartile of PAPP-A MoM had a higher prevalence of LGA infants compared to the lowest quartile, with an OR of 2.2 (1.4–3.5). They suggested that high PAPP-A levels might be useful in identifying LGA pregnancies, regardless of GDM status [10]. This result can be explained by a different study design and higher prevalence of SGA in low PAPP-A MoM levels than in high ones. Another study found that extremely high PAPP-A MoM values (above the 99th percentile) were associated with LGA infants [25]. However, the FASTER trial did not find a significant association between high PAPP-A levels and adverse pregnancy outcomes, including macrosomia [23]. In our study, high PAPP-A MoM levels in the GDM group were not associated with an increased risk of LGA infants. In the control group, higher PAPP-A MoM values were associated with a lower prevalence of SGA, but there was no significant difference in LGA. According to our findings, high PAPP-A MoM appears to be a protective factor against SGA in pregnancies without GDM and does not independently increase the risk of LGA, regardless of GDM status. However, in the GDM group, the prevalence of LGA infants was higher at every PAPP-A MoM level compared to the control group, which may be attributed to the mother’s glucose metabolism.

The FASTER trial reported a correlation between fβ-hCG MoM ≤ 5th pc and birthweight below the 10th pc (aOR 1.6, 95% CI 1.3–1.8) [23]. Two previous studies observed that low fβ-hCG MoM levels are linket to SGA, and low birthweight, which aligns with our findings [30, 32]. In the study by Sirikunalai et al., no association was found between low fβ-hCG MoM and GDM [32]. In our study, low fβ-hCG MoM showed an increased risk for SGA only in the control group (aOR 2.0–2.3, 95% CI 1.6–3.1), and the risk for LGA was not found in either the GDM or the control group. However, there is a contradictory study where low fβ-hCG MoM was not associated with SGA, but study methods and population with overrepresentation of LGA were different [25].

Other studies have shown that fβ-hCG levels greater than the 95th pc or over 2 MoM were associated with SGA, with a relative risk (RR) of 2.7 (95% CI 2.1–3.5). [25, 35] In our study, we observed that the prevalence of SGA did not vary with high fβ-hCG MoM levels, whether GDM was present or not. However, within the GDM group, an elevated fβ-hCG MoM level beyond the 90th pc exhibited an association with LGA (aOR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1–2.5), while surpassing the 95th pc did not reach statistical significance. Among the control group, there was no difference in LGA rates based on high fβ-hCG MoM levels. Additionally, in a previous study, there was no difference in LGA rates between the GDM and control groups based on fβ-hCG MoM levels [24].

The study’s strengths included a large population-based sample size of GDM patients and controls, as well as reliable register data. The definitions of SGA and LGA were clear and well-defined, and the study design allowed for a precise comparison of these newborn size categories. However, there were some limitations, such as OGTT was not performed for all pregnant women as a universal screening method; low risk women were excluded from screening as described in the Methods section according to Finnish Current Care guidelines [38]. Also, reliable data on oral glucose medication were not available and the classification of the GDM severity or information on women’s gestational weight gain was not available due to the study type. In this study, we did not evaluate the association of pre-eclampsia and SGA.

Conclusion

This study was the first to establish an association between low PAPP-A MoM levels and the risk of SGA in patients who were diagnosed with GDM subsequently during pregnancy. Association with low PAPP-A MoM and SGA is present despite of GDM status but seems to be weaker in the GDM group. In this study, high PAPP-A MoM levels appeared to be a protective factor against SGA, but they were not found to be a risk factor for LGA, regardless of GDM status. In non-GDM pregnancies, low fβ-hCG MoM levels were associated with SGA, but this association was not observed in GDM patients. Conversely, a high fβ-hCG MoM level ≥ 90th pc was associated with LGA only in GDM pregnancies. These findings supplement the knowledge of the role of PAPP-A as an important part of fetal growth.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Abbreviations

PAPP-A:

Pregnancy associated plasma protein-A

MoM:

multiples of the median

DM:

diabetes mellitus

GDM:

gestational diabetes mellitus

References

  1. WHO. World Health Organization. Definition, Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus and Its Complications: Report of a WHO Consultation Part 1, Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus 1999. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/66040 (accessed March 1, 2023).

  2. Metzger B, Lowe L, Dyer A, Trimble E, Chaovarindr U, Coustan D, et al. Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1991–2002. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMOA0707943.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lowe WL, Scholtens DM, Kuang A, Linder B, Lawrence JM, Lebenthal Y, et al. Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcome follow-up study (HAPO FUS): maternal gestational diabetes Mellitus and Childhood glucose metabolism. Diabetes Care. 2019;42:372–80. https://doi.org/10.2337/DC18-1646.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Wei Y, Juan J, Su R, Song G, Chen X, Shan R, et al. Risk of gestational diabetes recurrence and the development of type 2 diabetes among women with a history of gestational diabetes and risk factors: a study among 18 clinical centers in China. Chin Med J (Engl). 2022;135:665–71. https://doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000002036.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lauenborg J, Mathiesen E, Hansen T, Glümer C, Jørgensen T, Borch-Johnsen K, et al. The prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in a Danish population of women with previous gestational diabetes mellitus is three-fold higher than in the general population. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90:4004–10. https://doi.org/10.1210/JC.2004-1713.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhao P, Liu E, Qiao Y, Katzmarzyk PT, Chaput JP, Fogelholm M, et al. Maternal gestational diabetes and childhood obesity at age 9–11: results of a multinational study. Diabetologia. 2016;59:2339–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00125-016-4062-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Lawrence JB, Oxvig C, Overgaard MT, Sottrup-Jensen L, Gleich GJ, Hays LG, et al. The insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-dependent IGF binding protein-4 protease secreted by human fibroblasts is pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:3149–53. https://doi.org/10.1073/PNAS.96.6.3149.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Kaijomaa M, Rahkonen L, Ulander VM, Hämäläinen E, Alfthan H, Markkanen H, et al. Low maternal pregnancy-associated plasma protein A during the first trimester of pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017;136:76–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/IJGO.12002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Caliskan R, Atis A, Aydin Y, Acar D, Kiyak H, Topbas F. PAPP-A concentrations change in patients with gestational diabetes. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020;40:190–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2019.1615041.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wells G, Bleicher K, Han X, McShane M, Chan YF, Bartlett A, et al. Maternal diabetes, large-for-gestational-age births, and first trimester pregnancy-Associated plasma Protein-A. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100:2372–9. https://doi.org/10.1210/JC.2014-4103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Xiao D, Chenhong W, Yanbin X, Lu Z. Gestational diabetes mellitus and first trimester pregnancy-associated plasma protein A: a case-control study in a Chinese population. J Diabetes Investig. 2018;9:204–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/JDI.12672.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Snyder BM, Baer RJ, Oltman SP, Robinson JG, Breheny PJ, Saftlas AF, et al. Early pregnancy prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus risk using prenatal screening biomarkers in nulliparous women. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2020;163. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.DIABRES.2020.108139.

  13. Sweeting AN, Wong J, Appelblom H, Ross GP, Kouru H, Williams PF, et al. A first trimester prediction model for gestational diabetes utilizing aneuploidy and pre-eclampsia screening markers. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;31:2122–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2017.1336759.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cui J, Li P, Chen X, Li L, Ouyang L, Meng Z, et al. Study on the relationship and predictive value of first-trimester pregnancy-Associated plasma Protein-A, maternal factors, and biochemical parameters in gestational diabetes Mellitus: a large case-control study in Southern China mothers. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2023;16:947–57. https://doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S398530.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Borna S, Ashrafzadeh M, Ghaemi M, Eshraghi N, Hivechi N, Hantoushzadeh S. Correlation between PAPP-A serum levels in the first trimester of pregnancy with the occurrence of gestational diabetes, a multicenter cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023;23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-06155-7.

  16. Cheuk QY, Lo TK, Wong SF, Lee CP. Association between pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A levels in the first trimester and gestational diabetes mellitus in Chinese women. Hong Kong Med J. 2016;22:30–8. https://doi.org/10.12809/HKMJ144470.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tul N, Pušenjak S, Osredkar J, Spencer K, Novak-Antolič Ž. Predicting complications of pregnancy with first-trimester maternal serum free-betahCG, PAPP-A and inhibin-A. Prenat Diagn. 2003;23:990–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/PD.735.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Husslein H, Lausegger F, Leipold H, Worda C. Association between pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A and gestational diabetes requiring insulin treatment at 11–14 weeks of gestation. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25:2230–3. https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2012.684170.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Savvidou MD, Syngelaki A, Muhaisen M, Emelyanenko E, Nicolaides KH. First trimester maternal serum free β-human chorionic gonadotropin and pregnancy-associated plasma protein A in pregnancies complicated by diabetes mellitus. BJOG. 2012;119:410–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1471-0528.2011.03253.X.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Syngelaki A, Kotecha R, Pastides A, Wright A, Nicolaides KH. First-trimester biochemical markers of placentation in screening for gestational diabetes mellitus. Metabolism. 2015;64:1485–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.METABOL.2015.07.015.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tenenbaum-Gavish K, Sharabi-Nov A, Binyamin D, Møller HJ, Danon D, Rothman L, et al. First trimester biomarkers for prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus. Placenta. 2020;101:80–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PLACENTA.2020.08.020.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kantomaa T, Vääräsmäki M, Gissler M, Sairanen M, Nevalainen J. First trimester low maternal serum pregnancy associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) as a screening method for adverse pregnancy outcomes. J Perinat Med. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1515/JPM-2022-0241.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dugoff L, Hobbins JC, Malone FD, Porter TF, Luthy D, Comstock CH, et al. First-trimester maternal serum PAPP-A and free-beta subunit human chorionic gonadotropin concentrations and nuchal translucency are associated with obstetric complications: a population-based screening study (the FASTER Trial). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:1446–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2004.06.052.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Plasencia W, González Dávila E, Tetilla V, Padrón Pérez E, García Hernández JA, González González NL. First-trimester screening for large-for-gestational-age infants. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012;39:389–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/UOG.9060.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Cignini P, Savasta LM, Gulino FA, Vitale SG, Mangiafico L, Mesoraca A, et al. Predictive value of pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) and free beta-hCG on fetal growth restriction: results of a prospective study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016;293:1227–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00404-015-3947-Z.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Baer RJ, Lyell DJ, Norton ME, Currier RJ, Jelliffe-Pawlowski LL. First trimester pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A and birth weight. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;198:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EJOGRB.2015.12.019.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Fruscalzo A, Cividino A, Rossetti E, Maurigh A, Londero AP, Driul L. First trimester PAPP-A serum levels and long-term metabolic outcome of mothers and their offspring. Sci Rep 2020;10. https://doi.org/10.1038/S41598-020-61830-5

  28. Cole LA. Biological functions of hCG and hCG-related molecules. Reproductive Biology Endocrinol. 2010;8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-8-102.

  29. Kagan KO, Wright D, Baker A, Sahota D, Nicolaides KH. Screening for trisomy 21 by maternal age, fetal nuchal translucency thickness, free beta-human chorionic gonadotropin and pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;31:618–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/UOG.5331.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kirkegaard I, Henriksen TB, Uldbjerg N. Early fetal growth, PAPP-A and free β-hCG in relation to risk of delivering a small-for-gestational age infant. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;37:341–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/UOG.8808.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ong CYT, Liao AW, Spencer K, Munim S, Nicolaides KH. First trimester maternal serum free beta human chorionic gonadotrophin and pregnancy associated plasma protein A as predictors of pregnancy complications. BJOG. 2000;107:1265–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1471-0528.2000.TB11618.X.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Sirikunalai P, Wanapirak C, Sirichotiyakul S, Tongprasert F, Srisupundit K, Luewan S, et al. Associations between maternal serum free beta human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) levels and adverse pregnancy outcomes. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;36:178–82. https://doi.org/10.3109/01443615.2015.1036400.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sperling MM, Towner D, Davis J, Yamasato K. Second trimester prediction of gestational diabetes: maternal analytes as an additional screening tool. J Perinat Med 2021;50. https://doi.org/10.1515/JPM-2021-0054

  34. Visconti F, Quaresima P, Chiefari E, Caroleo P, Arcidiacono B, Puccio L, et al. First Trimester Combined Test (FTCT) as a predictor of gestational diabetes Mellitus. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJERPH16193654.

  35. Boonpiam R, Wanapirak C, Sirichotiyakul S, Sekararithi R, Traisrisilp K, Tongsong T. Quad test for fetal aneuploidy screening as a predictor of small-for-gestational age fetuses: a population-based study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12884-020-03298-9.

  36. Reynolds TM, Penney MD. The mathematical basis of multivariate risk screening: with special reference to screening for Down’s syndrome associated pregnancy. Ann Clin Biochem. 1990;27(Pt 5):452–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/000456329002700506.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Nicolaides KH. Screening for fetal aneuploidies at 11 to 13 weeks. Prenat Diagn. 2011;31:7–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/PD.2637.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Finnish Medical Society Duodecim. Current care guidelines for gestational diabetes 2022. Finland: Helsinki; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Rasmussen KM, Yaktine AL, Committee to Reexamine IOM Pregnancy Weight Guidelines. Food and Nutrition Board, Board on Children, Youth and Families, Institute of Medicine, National Research Council: Weight Gain during pregnancy. Reexamining Guidelines 2009:71–110.

  40. Koivunen S, Kajantie E, Torkki A, Bloigu A, Gissler M, Pouta A, et al. The changing face of gestational diabetes: the effect of the shift from risk factor-based to comprehensive screening. Eur J Endocrinol. 2015;173:623–32. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-15-0294.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Sankilampi U, Hannila ML, Saari A, Gissler M, Dunkel L. New population-based references for birth weight, length, and head circumference in singletons and twins from 23 to 43 gestation weeks. Ann Med. 2013;45:446–54. https://doi.org/10.3109/07853890.2013.803739.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Honarjoo M, Zarean E, Tarrahi MJ, Kohan S. Role of pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A) and human-derived chorionic gonadotrophic hormone (free β-hCG) serum levels as a marker in predicting of small for gestational age (SGA): a cohort study. J Res Med Sci. 2021;26. https://doi.org/10.4103/JRMS.JRMS_560_20.

  43. Hughes AE, Sovio U, Gaccioli F, Cook E, Charnock-Jones DS, Smith GCS. The association between first trimester AFP to PAPP-A ratio and placentally-related adverse pregnancy outcome. Placenta. 2019;81:25–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2019.04.005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Turrado Sánchez EM, De Miguel Sánchez V, Macía Cortiñas M. Correlation between PAPP-A levels determined during the First Trimester and Birth Weight at full-term. Reproductive Sci. 2023;30:3235–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-023-01270-4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Monari F, Menichini D, Spano’ Bascio L, Grandi G, Banchelli F, Neri I, et al. A first trimester prediction model for large for gestational age infants: a preliminary study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12884-021-04127-3.

  46. Poon LCY, Karagiannis G, Stratieva V, Syngelaki A, Nicolaides KH. First-trimester prediction of macrosomia. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2011;29:139–47. https://doi.org/10.1159/000318565.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors would like to thank Hannu Vähänikkilä for his contribution on statistical analysis.

Funding

This study and open access were funded by a grant from Orion Research Foundation sr. The funder had no role in the design and conduct of the study; management, analysis, and interpretation of data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Open Access funding provided by University of Oulu (including Oulu University Hospital).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland

    Tiina Kantomaa, Marja Vääräsmäki, Markku Ryynänen & Jaana Nevalainen

  2. Research Unit of Clinical Medicine and Medical Research Center, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland

    Tiina Kantomaa, Marja Vääräsmäki, Markku Ryynänen & Jaana Nevalainen

  3. Information Department, THL Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland

    Mika Gissler

  4. Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, 171 76, Stockholm, Sweden

    Mika Gissler

Authors
  1. Tiina Kantomaa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marja Vääräsmäki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mika Gissler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Markku Ryynänen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jaana Nevalainen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

This study contributed to the PhD thesis of the main author TK. TK and JN contributed to study design, data analysis, data interpretation and manuscript writing. MG contributed to obtaining data. MV and MR contributed data interpretation and, together with MG, to critical manuscript review and revision. All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jaana Nevalainen.

Ethics declarations

Details of ethics approval

According to the Finnish Act on Secondary Use of Health and Social Data 552/2019, the study participants did not need to provide an information consent form when using anonymous register data only used. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Northern Ostrobothnia Hospital District (EETTMK:99/2018) and the Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare gave their permission for the use of the MBR data (THL/1624/5.05.00/2018).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kantomaa, T., Vääräsmäki, M., Gissler, M. et al. First trimester maternal serum PAPP-A and free β-hCG levels and risk of SGA or LGA in women with and without GDM. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 24, 580 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06786-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06786-4

Keywords

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

ISSN: 1471-2393

Contact us