Skip to main content
Download PDF

Mobile health apps for pregnant women usability and quality rating scales: a systematic review

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth volume 24, Article number: 34 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Objective

This study is to identify the apps used by pregnant women during the technology era and to choose the best app from the point of view of pregnant women and experts.

Methods

The article is a research article that uses PRISMA flowchart. Given that there are many apps in the field of pregnancy and due to technological advances, the articles of the last 13 years that have been scientifically published in the databases of Google Scholar, PubMed, and Science Direct have been analyzed. The most widely used and, at the same time, the best app is introduced in terms of its high usability in users’ attitude. Finally, Apps will be compared in terms of accuracy, precision, and usability of the dimensions of Jacob Nielsen's five principles.

Results

According to the search strategy, 23 articles were identified qualitatively by reviewing both authors. Then, the types of apps were divided into three general categories, pregnant entertainment apps, pregnant information apps, and monitoring apps for mothers' physical health. Finally, 10 apps were selected and the Amila app was introduced as the best due to its high usability (Effectiveness %66.66) and users’ satisfaction or women’s choice (%98).

Conclusion

Using trusted apps to maintain their health and reduce traffic will be very important. Given that this research article was written with the aim of choosing the best app, that not only provides the required information to mothers, but also the ability to interact with doctors and specialists.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

In today's world of technology, electronic devices such as cell phones and tablets have become an essential tool in everyday life. Whether used for formal or personal purposes, these devices influence and shape the way people think and live. The rapid development of Internet-based communication technologies over the past twenty years has changed the lifestyles of people around the world. Residents of cities and rural can equally access the opportunities used by mobile devices [1,2,3].

When it comes to women's health and addressing important issues such as childbirth and pregnancy, the most important thing is to constantly monitor the health of the mother and fetus [4, 5]. In the past, due to unnecessary considerations due to ignorance, information about pregnancy and childbirth was usually done incompletely and with strange restrictions. Some articles even considered educating and informing people about this natural issue an ugly act [6,7,8] .

But fortunately, over time, extremist views have largely disappeared, so that today there are many tools to inform young women about the important issue of pregnancy and maintaining their health during this critical period [9,10,11,12] .

Today, with the significant advancement of medical technologies in the field of pregnancy and childbirth, the world of applications and websites has entered all aspects of human life, including pregnancy [13,14,15]. These days, it can be rarely seen a pregnant woman who is unaware of health status of her fetus [16]. Therefore, the category of motherhood has been and is a very lucrative and popular subject for launching startups in the world, so that if you look at virtual stores, you can encounter with a considerable variety of apps and websites in the field of motherhood [17,18,19].

Today, the use of apps is more popular than websites. As a result, most reputable sites in the field of pregnancy have designed apps that usually use tools such as estimating the time of delivery, calculating BMI, determining sex, calculating the required calories, scheduling the vaccine, searching for the baby's name, etc. in this program are included that can be easily used. The “Pregnancy and Childhood Calendar” is also one of the most popular sections of the applications, which provides accurate and complete articles from the first week of pregnancy to the 41st week of pregnancy [20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28] .

Today, from the topic of pregnancy health and counseling in this field to counseling for buying clothes, designing a room and preparing baby food, it is discussed and progressed in the context of applications. There are also many websites that work in this field and are a kind of app for young mothers [3, 21, 23, 29, 30] .

But because the multiplicity of these apps, choosing the best type has become difficult for pregnant women. The reliability of the software, its accuracy and precision, and finally how to use it is very important. However, the main concern is the quality of these programs. Therefore, there is a need to monitor the quality of information provided by these pregnancy programs. In the development of interactive mobile applications, one of the main factors that determine their success is satisfaction [31]. However, although many researchers have done research on mobile health-related applications, many of these studies are inaccurate.

On the other hand, despite heavy traffic, traveling is a dangerous act for pregnant women, and using the app can reduce their travel to some extent and provide them with the necessary information and measurement.

However, the quality, reliability and effectiveness of existing pregnancy programs have not yet been determined. Therefore, exposure to potentially harmful programs or participation in research with evidence-based mobile applications should be carefully considered, especially during pregnancy when women are more sensitive to external influences. In addition, unnecessary information and advice about lifestyle and health care can cause more anxiety and stress during pregnancy. Therefore, information on usability and effectiveness is very important for implementing new programs in maternal health care [6, 17, 18, 24, 26, 27, 32] .

In this research article, pregnancy apps will be categorized first and then they will be compared in terms of accuracy, precision and usability of the dimensions of Jacob Nielsen's five principles, it will be given users a detailed view to choose the best type of app.

Materials and methods

This article is a systematic review. The protocols for this article was registered to the PROSPERO database under the identification number CRD42023478584. First by searching for the keywords mHealth, pregnancy, mobile app, mobile phone, as well as combining the keywords in the Google Scholar, PubMed and Science Direct databases in the period October 2010 to September 2023, a total of 313 articles extracted. The strategy search was saved in Endnote version 20. Then, considering the inclusion and exclusion criteria (Table 1) by PRISMA flowchart and also reviewing the abstracts of articles by both authors separately, finally 23 articles were included in the study. Of these 23 articles, 10 apps were reviewed according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Figure 1 shows the study selection chart.

Table 1 Inclusion and exclusion criteria of the study
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Article selection chart based on PRISMA flowchart

Full size image

On the other hand, the evaluation of apps information was validated by the authors according to the guidelines.

Results

Of the 23 studies, 78% were conducted in Malaysia (29%), China (21%), the United States (19%) and Australia (9%). The apps reviewed in these articles included the dimensions of weight control, week-to-week care, pregnant women, and examining mothers' physical and mental condition, choosing a name for their child, and purchasing supplies. Table 2 shows the categories of different dimensions of pregnancy apps. There was a total of 251 apps on Google Play related to pregnant women, only a fraction of which have been scientifically reviewed, which is actually done in Table 2 of this category.. Google Play was checked for extracting users’ satisfaction. One of the most important parts of the app category is the information section. The information must be up-to-date and credible, and on the other hand, it must consider all sections of the pregnant woman and the scientific texts must be expressed in simple language according to guidelines. On the other hand, it is one of the sub-sections of information about specific pregnancies, which includes women with certain diseases such as diabetes, asthma and hypertension, which were excluded from the present study.

Table 2 Categories of pregnancy apps [1, 3, 6,7,8,9, 11,12,13, 16, 17, 23, 24, 26,27,28,29, 33,34,35,36,37]
Full size table

On the other hand, identifying the quality of apps also requires examining quality indicators such as usability (Table 3). Table 4 classifies the quality of pregnancy apps based on the dimensions of Nielsen's five principles of accuracy and precision based on literature review.

Table 3 Nielsen's Five Principles of Usability [38, 39]
Full size table
Table 4 The quality of apps based on Nielsen principles, accuracy and precision apps use extracted from articles
Full size table

Figure 2 shows a graph of user satisfaction with pregnancy software based on reports of app satisfaction on Google Play and the App Store.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Satisfaction chart of pregnancy app users

Full size image

Based on Table 4. Amila app has the highest users’ satisfaction in comparison with the other apps. And actually, has the better precision among the others.

Amila app

The Amila Pregnancy mobile app has changed the delivery of healthcare services to pregnant women around the world that are increasingly beneficial in their daily lives. Only a few digital interventions have been developed for pregnant women, and little is known about the acceptance and use of such mobile apps that help pregnant women. According to the evaluation of this program, Nielsen usability criteria were obtained with an average of 71.824 percent. This program has the following capabilities that are more accurate than similar apps and are more satisfied with users [13] .

  • Track your pregnancy week by week.

  • Get information about your baby.

  • Calculate current week of pregnancy.

  • Calculate due date (pregnancy date).

  • Track your weight.

  • Track baby kicks.

  • Make notes with your pregnancy symptoms (morning sickness, changes with your body, doctor appointment).

  • Free pregnancy app.

Figure 3 shows part of this software. As shown in the figure, the menu of this app has become more attractive in the 2023 update and has provided the ability to access different sections more quickly. Important parts of this software include weight monitoring, pregnancy exercises such as pregnancy yoga, weekly pregnancy information, and communication with the doctor, exchanging views with other mothers and using the experiences of pregnant women, pregnancy calendar and taking notes in it [8, 13].

Fig. 3
figure 3

Amila App scheme

Full size image

WebMD pregnancy

Five comprehensive tools to keep track of important needs and stay on schedule:

  • Breastfeeding, bottle-feeding, and solid-food trackers – record and review all your feeding and nursing sessions, including both breast milk and formula. It has the highest satisfaction after Amila app [40, 41].

Sprout pregnancy

Sprout pregnancy has the 3rd rank in satisfaction. Trusted and recommended by expecting families all over the world, Sprout Pregnancy guides you through every day of your pregnancy. It helps keep you organized and educated about the many exciting changes and developments happening in your body and for your growing baby [42].

“Day to day pregnancy tracking”

Day to Day Pregnancy Tracking application is the most advanced, comprehensive and useful pregnancy tracking application in Google Play. It NEVER requires an active Internet connection. This application will accompany you in your great adventure which will take 280 days. That is the 2nd popular app based on Table 4 [43].

Pregnancy + tracker

Pregnancy + tracker has the 3rd rank in this paper. This pregnancy app will keep users calm throughout their pregnancy. It will let you know what's happening with your unborn, week by week, from that positive pregnancy test to delivery [44] .

The most applicable apps based on Nielsen principles were explained.

Discussion

In this systematic review article of category pregnancy apps and Amila app according to Table 4 in terms of usability, accuracy and precision received the highest score compared to other apps and was suggested as a reliable app to pregnant women and experts in this field. According to the evaluation of this program, Nielsen usability criteria were obtained with an average of 71.824%. Given that there are many pregnancy apps in the Apple Store and Google Play, finding the most reputable ones is very difficult and requires scientific research. Out of 23 extracted articles, we reached a total of 10 apps for which usability criteria were examined.

Mohan S and et al. has done an RCT. The key point of this paper was to evaluate the usability and quality of the “E-Midwife” mobile application for nurse-midwives, which concentrates on obstetric complications. The article has shown that the E-midwife mobile application has a high usability and quality which makes its usage effective and efficient. It is shown that these similar mobile apps could be used along with other educational strategy for educating the nurse-midwives [45] .

Anderson LN and et al. were shown the development and assessment a reliable scale for measuring mobile health (mHealth) credibility. In this paper Three scale dimensions were chosen: concern, character, and competence. Both referent source for mobile apps and app developer were significantly associated with perceived mHealth credibility [46] .

Azham Hussain et al. In Malaysia evaluated Amila using the Nielsen Five Principles, which found that some of the main menu extensions were difficult for the public to access, and it was difficult for users to access the calendar and record events in it. In the 2023 version, these problems have been fixed [36, 47] .

A study by Alicia A. Dahl et al. collected pregnancy apps with a weight control approach for pregnant women, which collected the apps by 2016 and reported the results. In this article, out of 87 apps surveyed, only six met the inclusion criteria. Of these apps, Day by Day Pregnancy Tracker, Pregnancy + tracker, Pregnancy & Baby Tracker, and Pregnancy + also met the inclusion criteria in this study [2] .

A review by Sanne B Overdijkink et al. also examines the life cycle of pregnancy apps with the approach of pregnant women with the disease. This study was excluded due to exclusion criteria in this article and only the apps introduced in this article were used in this article [48] .

In 2017, Tamar Krishnamurti et al. introduced the MPH Pregnancy App as the first pregnancy app based on behavioral decision research that provides and collects risk information related to preterm delivery. In the new update, satisfaction is 56%. And due to the similarities with other software and lacked some of the features of Table 2, was not selected for this study and did not enter the study. Because in this study, articles that had all the features of Table 2 were reported [49] .

In general, it can be concluded that due to the high volume of pregnancy apps and the lack of review of many of them in terms of usability, a research article to review such apps in terms of user-friendliness and user satisfaction is important for pregnant women and professionals in this field. Given that many apps in the field of pregnancy are commercial and there is no scientific article about them, so they did not participate in the present study [1, 20,21,22, 33, 50] which is one of the main limitations of this article and the strength of the article is that the apps reported in this article has been scientifically validated by experts.

Today, the use of smartphones has grown significantly and most people use mobile apps instead of websites. Due to the prevalence of different viruses and the risk of pregnant women, most pregnant women have turned to apps to reduce their travel to find out about their status [20, 21, 23,24,25, 27, 28, 51, 52]. But using a reputable and reliable app is also very important. Because a search on Google Play or the App Store shows a large number of apps for them, many of which may not be scientifically qualified [53,54,55,56,57,58,59] .

In this article, the best apps that are also popular from the users' point of view were introduced so that not only pregnant women but also obstetricians can use them. Some of the available apps were designed specifically for pregnant mothers. Mothers with underlying diseases such as diabetes, asthma and high blood pressure. Such apps were excluded from the study because they included a certain segment of pregnant women, and finally 10 of the most widely used apps in the field of pregnancy were selected, which were approved by users and scientifically evaluated.

Amila App, WebMD Pregnancy, Sprout Pregnancy, Day to Day Pregnancy Tracking and Pregnancy + tracker had the highest satisfaction range, 98%, 90%88%75% and 75% respectively. In comparison with other apps, the highest accuracy and precision are reported too. So, they can be introduced to doctors and pregnant women as a good app for tracking. Details of the included studies are shown in Table 5.

Table 5 Details of the included studies
Full size table

Conclusion

Choosing a valid application to maintain pregnant women health and reduce traffic in the current situation will be very crucial. The aim of this article was choosing the best app, so it can be a suggestion for pregnant women and even gynecologists to introduce such apps despite the heavy traffic and technology era. Finally, the Amila app was selected as one of those apps that not only provides the required information to mothers, but also the ability to interact with doctors and specialists, due to its higher accuracy (%98), precision (%98) and usability than other apps(based on Table 4) clinical implications of this study and recommendations are as using more technologies with physicians and patients can help them monitor patients and themselves respectively, and can attached to wearable devices to aware them from disease or problems.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

Abbreviations

App:

Application

mHealth:

Mobile health

MPH:

Perinatal methylphenidate

References

  1. Brown HM, et al. A review of pregnancy iPhone apps assessing their quality, inclusion of behaviour change techniques, and nutrition information. Matern Child Nutr. 2019;15(3):e12768.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Dahl AA, et al. Mobilizing mHealth for moms: a review of mobile apps for tracking gestational weight gain. J Technol Behav Sci. 2018;3(1):32–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gilbert S, Irvine R, D'or M, Adam MT, Collins CE, Marriott R, Rollo M, Walker R, Rae K. Indigenous Women and Their Nutrition During Pregnancy (the Mums and Bubs Deadly Diets Project): Protocol for a Co-designed mHealth Resource Development Study. JMIR Research Protocols. 2023;12(1):e45983.

  4. Langarizadeh M, et al. The nutritional content required to design an educational application for infertile women. BMC Womens Health. 2023;23(1):1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Haelle T. Pregnancy apps: your patients use them—are you up to speed. Medscape Ob/Gyn 2018:28. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20021012.

  6. Lazarevic N, Lecoq M, Bœhm C, Caillaud C. Pregnancy Apps for Self-Monitoring: Scoping Review of the Most Popular Global Apps Available in Australia. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(2):1012. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20021012.

  7. Hughson J-AP, et al. The rise of pregnancy apps and the implications for culturally and linguistically diverse women: narrative review. JMIR mHealth eHealth. 2018;6(11):e189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jacobson A. The risks of pregnancy-tracking apps. Risk Manage. 2019;66(7):24–8.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jangi M, et al. A systematic review on reminder systems in physical therapy. Caspian J Intern Med. 2018;9(1):7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Peyton T. et al. “Every pregnancy is different” designing mHealth for the pregnancy ecology. In: Proceedings of the 2014 conference on designing interactive systems. 2014.

  11. Qing L, Weiying S. A Chinese survey of women’s use and expectation of pregnancy applications. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019;264:749–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rau NM, et al. Designing a tablet-based prematurity education app for parents hospitalized for preterm birth. Int J Med Inform. 2020;141:104200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hussain A. et al. The UX of amila pregnancy on mobile device. In: AIP Conference Proceedings. 2017. AIP Publishing LLC.

  14. de Lima YO. et al. Providing patients with actionable medical knowledge: mHealth apps for laypeople. In: 2023 26th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD). 2023. IEEE.

  15. Langarizadeh M, et al. Design and evaluation of an educational mobile program for liver transplant patients. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023;23(1):974.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Peyton T. et al. Information, sharing and support in pregnancy: addressing needs for mHealth design. In: Proceedings of the companion publication of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing. 2014.

  17. Thomas GM, Lupton D. Threats and thrills: pregnancy apps, risk and consumption. Health Risk Soc. 2016;17(7–8):495–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang N, et al. Understanding the use of smartphone apps for health information among pregnant Chinese women: mixed methods study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019;7(6):e12631.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Muehlmann M, Tomczyk S. Mobile apps for sexual and reproductive health education: a systematic review and quality assessment. Curr Sexual Health Rep 2023:1–23.

  20. Berglund Scherwitzl E, et al. Fertility awareness-based mobile application for contraception. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2016;21(3):234–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Carter J, et al. Mobile phone apps for clinical decision support in pregnancy: a scoping review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019;19(1):219.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Chan KL, Chen M. Effects of social media and Mobile health apps on pregnancy care: meta-analysis. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019;7(1):e11836.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Gyselaers W, et al. Mobile health applications for prenatal assessment and monitoring. Curr Pharm Des. 2019;25(5):615–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hantsoo L, et al. A mobile application for monitoring and management of depressed mood in a vulnerable pregnant population. Psychiatr Serv. 2018;69(1):104–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Khalil A, et al. Telemonitoring for hypertensive disease in pregnancy. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2019;16(8):653–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rathbone AL, Prescott J. The use of Mobile apps and SMS messaging as physical and mental health interventions: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(8):e295.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Sales RO, et al. Development and evaluation of an application for syphilis control. Rev Bras Enferm. 2019;72(5):1326–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sommer J, et al. Mobile application for pregnant women: what do mothers say? Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;245:221–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Fonseca F. et al. Smart mobile computing in pregnancy care. In: CATA. 2019.

  30. Farajollahi B, et al. Predicting hospital readmission of diabetic patients using machine learning. Front Health Inform. 2021;10(1):74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Nabovati E, et al. Pregnant women’s use and attitude toward Mobile phone features for self-management. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023;23(1):77.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Thomas GM, Lupton D. Playing pregnancy: the ludification and gamification of expectant motherhood in smartphone apps. M/C J 2015;18(5).

  33. Brown HM, et al. A review of pregnancy apps freely available in the Google play store. Health Promot J Austr. 2020;31(3):340–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Frazer C. et al. Pregnancy apps: a closer look at the implications for childbirth educators. 2015.

  35. Günay A, Erbuğ Ç. Mobile health integration in pregnancy. In: Current and Emerging mHealth Technologies. Springer; 2018. p. 57–83.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  36. Hussain A, et al. A mobile usability evaluation of a pregnancy app. J Telecommun Electr Comput Eng JTEC. 2018;10(1–11):13–8.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Sustamy RP, Pratiwi RD, Wahyuni S. Using the smartphone application for pregnancy care: a literature review. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Science and Health. 2019.

  38. Miller K, et al. The design of decisions: matching clinical decision support recommendations to Nielsen’s design heuristics. Int J Med Inform. 2018;117:19–25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Nielsen J. How to conduct a heuristic evaluation. Nielsen Norman Group. 1995;1:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Krauskopf PB. CDC contraception and WebMD pregnancy mobile apps. J Nurse Practition. 2018;14(10):e221–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Bert F, et al. There comes a baby! What should I do? Smartphones’ pregnancy-related applications: a web-based overview. Health Informatics J. 2016;22(3):608–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Langston-Cox AG, et al. Prolong: a double-blind randomised placebo-controlled trial of broccoli sprout extract in women with early onset preeclampsia. A clinical trial protocol. BMJ Open. 2019;9(10):e027493.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Carvalho P, et al. Development of fertility programs to achieve high 21-day pregnancy rates in high-producing dairy cows. Theriogenology. 2018;114:165–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Kundu S, Kabir A, Islam MN. Evaluating usability of pregnancy tracker applications in Bangladesh: a heuristic and semiotic evaluation. In: 2020 IEEE 8th R10 Humanitarian Technology Conference (R10-HTC). 2020. IEEE.

  45. Mohan S, Sharmil HS. Usability and quality evaluation of the “E-Midwife” mobile application for nurse-midwives in obstetric complications: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Commun Based Nurs Midwifery. 2023;11(4):247–56.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Anderson LN, Womack JJ, Ledford CJ. Initial development and testing of a measure of credibility of mobile health apps: a clinical study among women seeking prenatal care. Atlantic J Commun. 2023;31(2):144–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Nawangsari S, et al. Design of Mobile Digital Healthcare Application For Pregnant Women Based on Android. MATRIK: Jurnal Manajemen, Teknik Informatika dan Rekayasa Komputer. 2022;21(2):439–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Overdijkink SB, et al. The usability and effectiveness of mobile health technology–based lifestyle and medical intervention apps supporting health care during pregnancy: systematic review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018;6(4):e109.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Krishnamurti T, et al. Development and testing of the Myhealthypregnancy app: a behavioral decision research-based tool for assessing and communicating pregnancy risk. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017;5(4):e42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Barassi V. BabyVeillance? Expecting parents, online surveillance and the cultural specificity of pregnancy apps. Soc Med+Soc. 2017;3(2):2056305117707188.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Molteni E, et al. SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) infection in pregnant women: characterization of symptoms and syndromes predictive of disease and severity through real-time, remote participatory epidemiology. medRxiv, 2020.

  52. Peterson SF, Fok WK. Mobile technology for family planning. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2019;31(6):459–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Ayatollahi H, Ghalandar Abadi M, Hemmat M. Web and mobile-based technologies for monitoring high-risk pregnancies. BMJ Health Care Inform. 2019;26(1):e000025.

  54. Bachiri M, et al. Mobile personal health records for pregnancy monitoring functionalities: analysis and potential. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2016;134:121–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Borgen I, et al. Smartphone application for women with gestational diabetes mellitus: a study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2017;7(3):e013117.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Haddad SM, Souza RT, Cecatti JG. Mobile technology in health (mHealth) and antenatal care-searching for apps and available solutions: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2019;127:1–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Marcano Belisario JS, et al. A bespoke mobile application for the longitudinal assessment of depression and mood during pregnancy: protocol of a feasibility study. BMJ Open. 2017;7(5):e014469.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Nikolopoulos M, et al. Mobile phone applications for gestational diabetes mellitus: appraisal and perspectives. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019;262:39–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Tumminia A, et al. “MySweetGestation”: a novel smartphone application for women with or at risk of diabetes during pregnancy. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019;158:107896.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Varastegan Institute for Medical Sciences for their great cooperation.

Funding

There is no fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Health Information Technology, Varastegan Institute for Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

    Mohammad Reza Mazaheri Habibi & Fateme Moghbeli

  2. Department of Health Information Management, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Mostafa Langarizadeh & Seyed Ali Fatemi Aghda

  3. Research Center for Health Technology Assessment and Medical Informatics, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran

    Seyed Ali Fatemi Aghda

Authors
  1. Mohammad Reza Mazaheri Habibi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fateme Moghbeli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mostafa Langarizadeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Seyed Ali Fatemi Aghda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SAFA and MRMH conceived the study. SAFA and MRMH designed the search strategy. MRMH, ML and FM conducted the search, study selection, and data extraction. FM and SAFA conducted the statistical analyses. MRMH wrote the first draft of the manuscript. SAFA and MRMH critically revised the manuscript. The authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seyed Ali Fatemi Aghda.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Supplementary table 1.

Search strategy used for each online database.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mazaheri Habibi, M.R., Moghbeli, F., Langarizadeh, M. et al. Mobile health apps for pregnant women usability and quality rating scales: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 24, 34 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-06206-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-06206-z

Keywords

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

ISSN: 1471-2393

Contact us