Skip to main content
Download PDF

Prevalence of maternal mortality causes based on ICD-MM: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth volume 23, Article number: 821 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Maternal mortality is a universal public health challenge. ICD-Maternal Mortality (ICD-MM) was introduced in 2012 to facilitate the gathering, analysis, and interpretation of data on maternal deaths worldwide. The present study aimed to estimate the global prevalence of maternal death causes through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods

A systematic literature search was conducted using various databases, including Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, as well as Persian databases such as MagIran and Scientific Information Database (SID). The search encompassed articles published until August 21, 2022. Thirty-four eligible articles were included in the final analysis. Analysis was performed using a meta-analysis approach. The exact Clopper-Pearson confidence intervals, heterogeneity assessment, and random effects models with Mantel-Haenszel methods were employed using the STATA software version 14.2.

Results

The most prevalent causes of maternal deaths, listed in descending order from highest to lowest prevalence, were non-obstetric complications (48.32%), obstetric hemorrhage (17.63%), hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, childbirth, and the puerperium (14.01%), other obstetric complications (7.11%), pregnancy with abortive outcome (5.41%), pregnancy-related infection (5.26%), unanticipated complications of management (2.25%), unknown/undetermined causes (2.01%), and coincidental causes (1.59%), respectively.

Conclusion

Non-obstetric complications, obstetric hemorrhage, and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, childbirth, and puerperium were the most common causes of maternal deaths. To reduce the burden of maternal mortality causes, increasing awareness and promoting self-care management among women of reproductive age, and implementing effective screening mechanisms for high-risk mothers during pregnancy, childbirth, and the puerperium can play a significant role. ICD-MM enables the uniform collection and comparison of maternal death information at different levels (local, national, and international) by facilitating the consistent collection, analysis, and interpretation of data on maternal deaths. Our findings can be utilized by policymakers and managers at various levels to facilitate necessary planning aimed at reducing the burden of maternal mortality causes.

Peer Review reports

Background

Accurate death statistics are important for public health decision-making and evaluating the effectiveness of public health programs. The absence of reliable data on the mortality causes can result in the provision of low-quality health services [1, 2]. Maternal mortalities are among the avoidable deaths that have garnered national, international, and political commitments for reduction. Identification of suitable strategies to prevent them is considered one of the most important programs in most countries [3,4,5].

According to the WHO, “A maternal death is the death of a woman while pregnant or within 42 days of termination of pregnancy, irrespective of the duration and the site of the pregnancy, from any cause related to or aggravated by the pregnancy or its management, but not from accidental or incidental causes” [6]. The maternal mortality ratio (MMR) is a key public health indicator that quantifies the number of maternal deaths per 100,000 live births. It serves as a reflection of the quality of health services and the position and importance accorded to women in the society [7,8,9]. The global MMR has decreased significantly from 342 in 2000 to 211 in 2017 [10]. However, despite global efforts to minimize maternal deaths, this index remains high [11]. According to the WHO statistics in 2017, approximately 810 women died every day from preventable causes related to pregnancy and childbirth, with 94% of these deaths occurring in low and lower-middle-income countries. In less developed countries, MMR is 415 per 100,000 live births, which is very high compared to Europe and North America (12 per 100,000 live births) as well as Australia and New Zealand (7 per 100,000 live births) [12,13,14].

Maternal health is one of the key priorities of the WHO. Furthermore, in line with the supplementary goal of Sustainable Development Goal 3 (SDG 3.1), it is targeted that no country should have a maternal mortality ratio exceeding 140 per 100,000 live births by 2030 [10, 15, 16]. To achieve this goal, there is a need for quality data, especially on mortality causes to design interventions and reduce the global burden of maternal mortality [17, 18]. According to the WHO, severe bleeding (mainly postpartum hemorrhage), infections (typically postpartum infections), hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (pre-eclampsia and eclampsia), complications associated with delivery, and unsafe abortion collectively contribute to 75% of maternal mortalities [12,13,14].

Accurate classification of the causes of maternal mortality is crucial for planning targeted interventions aimed at achieving the goal of ending avoidable maternal deaths. The WHO Application of ICD-10 to Deaths During Pregnancy, Childbirth, and the Puerperium: ICD-Maternal Mortality (ICD-MM) was introduced in 2012 with the aim of facilitating the gathering, analysis, and interpretation of data on maternal deaths worldwide consistently [19]. The purpose of this guideline is to promote the use of standardized guidelines for maternal death classification, aiming at enhancing usability, improving comparability of maternal deaths across local, national, and international levels, and reducing coding errors related to the cause of death (COD) [20, 21].

Given the significance of evaluating the current situation, identifying the causes, and determining related risk factors in efforts to reduce maternal mortality, this meta-analysis study was conducted with the aim of determining the common causes of maternal mortality based on ICD-MM classification. To the best of our knowledge, no previous systematic review and meta-analysis have comprehensively investigated maternal mortality globally using the ICD-MM classification.

Methods

This systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting item for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement guideline [22] in five stages, including (1) literature review, (2) establishment of inclusion and exclusion criteria, (3) selection of relevant studies, (4) quality assessment of included studies, and (5) data analysis.

Literature review: databases and keywords

A systematic literature search was conducted in English databases, including Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar search engines, as well as Persian databases such as MagIran and Scientific Information Database (SID), to identify relevant studies published until August 21, 2022. The following search terms were used in our search strategy: “mortality, maternal” OR “maternal mortal*” OR “maternal death*” AND “International Classification of Diseases Maternal Mortality” OR “ICD-MM”. A complementary search was conducted by manually scanning the references of the retrieved articles and previous systematic reviews on the topic to ensure all of the relevant studies were found. The details of the search strategy are presented in supplementary appendix A.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

The inclusion criteria for the analysis were as follows: original research studies with English abstracts, studies that focused on maternal mortality causes according to the ICD-MM classification, and studies that focused on maternal death occurring during pregnancy or within 42 days of termination of pregnancy published up to August 21, 2022.

Studies with abstracts in languages other than English, studies not reporting adequate data, studies that did not report the outcome of interest, reports retrieved from personal weblogs, systematic reviews, and letters to editors, studies that focused on maternal near miss, studies that focused on maternal death occurring after 42 days of termination of pregnancy, and ancillary or duplicate studies (studies with the same findings that have been published more than once with the same or different titles) were excluded from analysis.

Selection of studies

At this stage, after searching the databases, the duplicated articles among the databases were removed. The remaining articles were reviewed based on the title and abstract, and irrelevant articles were excluded. After that, the full texts of the remaining articles were examined using the inclusion and exclusion criteria. During this stage, each article was independently reviewed by both authors (JA and AK), and any discrepancies were resolved through the involvement of a third author (AP).

Quality appraisal

All included articles were assessed using the standard checklist of the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS Scale) [23]. The evaluation process was carried out by two independent reviewers, and any discrepancies were resolved through discussion or consultation with a third author, if necessary. The interrater reliability was high (κ = 0.98). The eligibility of the articles in this step was determined based on the NOS score. A NOS score of 7–9 indicated high-level quality, a score of 5–6 indicated moderate-level quality, and a score below 5 was considered low-level quality. Low quality studies were excluded. Out of 29 studies, only one with a score of 5 was excluded. Of the remaining 28 studies, one study [19] with a score of 6 and moderate quality and the remaining 27 studies with a score of 7 or more and high quality were included in the meta-analysis.

Statistical analysis

After the quality appraisal process, the full text of each study was reviewed, and the data were extracted from the studies using a predesigned form (Supplementary Appendix B). The form included basic characteristics of the studies such as the authors’ names, publication year, study design, location, country classification according to the World Bank 2023 [24], participants’ age, and sample size. Furthermore, the form contained nine maternal mortality causes based on ICD-MM. The causes included in the analysis were categorized into nine groups: six direct maternal mortality causes (1. abortive outcome, 2. hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, childbirth, and the puerperium, 3. obstetric hemorrhage, 4. pregnancy-related infection, 5. other obstetric complications, and 6. unanticipated complications), one indirect maternal mortality cause (7. non-obstetric complications), 8. unknown/undetermined causes, and 9. coincidental causes [6].

The analysis of extracted data was carried out using a meta-analysis approach. The exact Clopper–Pearson confidence intervals were computed to determine the error proportion of each individual study [25]. Heterogeneity was quantified using the Cochran Q-test (p < 0.1) and the I2 index. The I2 values of 25%, 50%, and 75% indicate low, moderate, and high heterogeneity, respectively. All analyses were conducted using a random-effects model with the Mantel-Haenszel method. Random-effects models are preferred as they are more conservative and have better properties, particularly in the presence of heterogeneity [26]. The pooled prevalence of maternal death causes and their 95% confidence intervals were computed using the metan command in the STATA. Any potential publication bias was explored using Begg’s test and Egger’s test, which evaluate whether the precision of the studies is related to the magnitude of their effect size. All analyses were performed using the STATA software version 14.2 and Microsoft Excel 2019.

Results

The systematic search of the databases initially yielded a total of 591 articles, out of which 79 articles were identified as duplicates and subsequently removed. The remaining 512 articles underwent screening based on their titles and abstracts, resulting in the exclusion of 430 and 13 articles, respectively. The full texts of the remaining 69 articles were assessed for compliance with the inclusion and exclusion criteria, leading to the exclusion of 40 articles. The details of the selection process are presented in Fig. 1. Among the included studies, three cross-sectional studies [27,28,29] reported maternal mortality causes for multiple years separately. For analysis purposes, the findings of each reported year were considered as separate studies. As a result, the number of included articles in the meta-analysis increased to 34.

Fig. 1
figure 1

PRISMA flow diagram

Full size image

A total of 34 studies were found to be eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis, consisting of 3 studies conducted in developed countries and 31 studies conducted in developing countries. The most common study designs among the included studies were cross-sectional (94%), with only two studies utilizing a cohort design.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Yearly distribution of published articles

Full size image

The majority of the studies were published within the last four years (n = 26,76.5%), with the highest frequency of published articles observed in 2021 (n = 8, 23.5%) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Country distribution of published articles

Full size image

India had the highest number of published articles (n = 9, 26.5%), followed by Turkey (n = 5, 14.7%). Iran and the UK each had three studies, while Malawi, Nigeria, Suriname, and Zimbabwe each had two studies. The remaining countries contributed only one published study in the search field (Fig. 3).

Table 1 Characteristics of the subjects (34 studies)
Full size table

A summary of the included studies, including the first author, publication year, country, country classification, study design, and sample size, is presented in Table 1. Approximately 91% of the studies were conducted in developing countries.

Table 2 Frequency of maternal mortality causes of study subjects (34 studies)
Full size table

Table 2 presents the frequency of maternal mortality causes reported in each study.

Table 3 Results of meta-analysis (Random-effects model)
Full size table

Heterogeneity statistics indicated a high level of heterogeneity among the included studies (p < 0.001). Hence, random-effects models were applied to all studies for each type of error. Begg’s and Egger’s test also indicated that there was no publication bias in any of the studies regarding all types of maternal mortality causes (P > 0.05). The pooled prevalence of maternal mortality causes and their 95% confidence intervals are reported in Table 3. This table also indicates the number of eligible studies and the total number of subjects in each cause-specific meta-analysis. Overall, nine meta-analyses were performed. Forest plots were eliminated because of setting limitations and redundant reporting of findings in the paper. According to Table 3, non-obstetric complications were found to be the most prevalent cause of maternal mortality, while coincidental causes were identified as the least common cause.

Discussion

This meta-analysis included 34 studies and aimed to pool the prevalence of maternal mortality causes worldwide. The majority of the included studies (91%) were conducted in developing countries, with 76% of them published within the last four years. Notably, more than a quarter of the studies were conducted in India.

Our findings revealed that non-obstetric complications were the most prevalent cause of maternal mortality in the included studies. Except for a study conducted by Aikpitanyi et al. [34] who examined but did not report any cases of non-obstetric complications leading to maternal deaths, the remaining 33 studies reported different rates ranging from 5 to 60% for this group of causes. Knight et al. [49] reported a higher average rate of non-maternal deaths in the UK compared to developing countries. Previous studies [50, 51] have also highlighted that in developed countries, indirect causes of maternal mortality, particularly non-obstetric complications, are more prevalent than direct causes. This has been attributed to the well-organized antenatal care programs in these countries.

Obstetric hemorrhages were identified as the second most prevalent cause among all causes and the first most common cause among direct causes of maternal deaths in the included articles. All of the studies examined this group of causes and reported rates ranging from 4.1 to 66.6%. About 62% of maternal mortalities worldwide can be attributed to direct causes, with obstetric hemorrhages accounting for nearly half of them (about 27%) [50]. Postpartum hemorrhages are the most common cause of obstetric hemorrhages (72%) [51] accounting for about 25% of maternal deaths globally [52]. This is despite the fact that the majority of maternal deaths caused by hemorrhages are preventable [53, 54]. It has been estimated that, on average, uterine contraction is responsible for 75% of postpartum hemorrhages [55]. Therefore, the control and treatment of uterine contraction play a significant role in reducing the incidence of maternal deaths.

The findings of the present study revealed that hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, childbirth, and the puerperium were the third most prevalent cause of maternal mortality among all causes and the second most prevalent cause among direct causes (ranging from 2.5 to 45%). These findings are in line with the global prevalence of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy reported as the second most common cause of maternal mortality [56]. Similar to our findings, Keskinkılıç et al. [57] reported that hypertensive disorders were the third most prevalent cause among all causes and the second most common cause among direct causes of maternal deaths in Turkey. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy include pre-existing (chronic) or pregnancy-induced hypertension and are strongly associated with cardiac attack and stroke [56]. Screening and identifying pregnant women with hypertensive disorders, providing appropriate treatment, and enhancing their self-care management through mobile-based applications can help control the disease and reduce mortality associated with these conditions.

We found that other obstetric complications were the fourth most prevalent cause of maternal mortality (7.11%) that ranged from 1.4% in India to 22.4% in Iran. This group included “blood clot embolism, amniotic fluid embolism, intentional self-harm (death by suicide), complications of obstetric surgery and procedures (such as disruption of cesarean section wound, cardiomyopathy, and other complications of the puerperium)” [58]. On average, the risk of venous thromboembolism is 4.5 times higher in pregnant women compared to non-pregnant women. Furthermore, advanced maternal age (over 35) and underlying conditions such as thrombophilia, lupus erythematosus, cardiovascular disease, postpartum infections, and obesity have been identified as serious risk factors for thromboembolism [59]. Rath and Stelzl [60] found that appropriate pharmacological thromboprophylaxis could reduce the risk of venous thrombosis by about 65%. Developing and implementing effective monitoring mechanisms for high-risk mothers and designing standard care, treatment, and surgery methods for pregnant patients can reduce the rate of maternal mortality due to this group of causes.

Pregnancy with abortive outcome was the fifth most prevalent cause (5.41%, ranging from 1 to 17.5%) among all causes and the fourth cause among direct causes. Pregnancy with abortive outcome includes “abortion, miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy, and other conditions leading to maternal death and a pregnancy with abortive outcome” [61]. Unsafe abortion is one of the most common causes of maternal mortality across the world, with higher rates in countries with stricter abortion laws [62]. Abortion law reforms in countries with restricted abortion, policy-making and planning for prevention and early detection of ectopic pregnancy risk factors, and promoting the awareness of women of reproductive age can reduce maternal mortalities due to these conditions.

The present study found that pregnancy-related infection was the sixth most prevalent maternal mortality cause among all causes (5.26%, ranging from 1.9 to 22.6%) in the reviewed studies. Obstetric infections are widely recognized as a significant contributor to maternal mortality worldwide, with a higher incidence observed in low- and middle-income countries. [63]. Pregnancy-related infections include “endometritis, peritonitis, pelvic abscess, surgical site infection, and necrotizing fasciitis.” [61] Improving the timeliness and accuracy of management for obstetric infections, ensuring access to appropriate healthcare facilities, and addressing delays in seeking care are crucial factors in reducing maternal mortality associated with pregnancy-related infections [64]. Therefore, promoting early diagnosis, facilitating timely access to proper care, and ensuring effective treatment can significantly reduce the burden of obstetric infections.

Unanticipated complications of management were the seventh most common cause of maternal mortality (2.25%, ranging from 1.1 to 13.6%). This group of maternal mortality causes includes conditions such as “severe adverse defects and other unanticipated complications of medical and surgical care during pregnancy, childbirth, or the puerperium” [61]. Despite the low prevalence of this group of maternal mortality causes, analysis of its prevalence provides valuable information that can shed light on the epidemic of iatrogenic-induced maternal mortality.

The present study revealed that unknown/undetermined maternal death was the eighth most prevalent cause of maternal mortality (2.01%, ranging from 0.3 to 20.9%) in the included studies. This group of causes refers to maternal deaths that occur during pregnancy, childbirth, or the puerperium, but the underlying cause of death is either unknown or cannot be determined [61]. Coincidental causes were identified as the least prevalent (ninth most common) causes of maternal mortality (1.9%, ranging from 0.3 to 11%). Coincidental causes are the deaths that occur during pregnancy, childbirth, or the puerperium due to external causes [61]. Coincidental causes are likely to be constant during and after pregnancy because they are not caused by pregnancy. However, being pregnant at the time of such conditions can increase the risk of maternal death.

The present meta-analysis analyzed the prevalence of causes of maternal deaths based on the international standard (ICD-MM) globally. Therefore, the results of the study can have the potential to encourage researchers and healthcare managers at different levels (local, national, and international) to collect, analyze, interpret, and compare the causes of maternal deaths using this international standard.

Study limitation

The present study had some limitations including (1) several factors such as selected databases, keywords, and processes to search for studies, inclusion and exclusion criteria of studies and the number of samples included in the meta-analysis can affect the results of the meta-analysis of the prevalence of maternal causes of deaths. Therefore, it is conceivable that other similar studies with modifications to each of the previously mentioned factors will result in partially different results. (2) The results of the present study focused on the prevalence of maternal deaths reported based on the ICD-MM classification, so many studies that investigated the causes of maternal deaths based on other sources were excluded. (3) The present meta-analysis excluded maternal near misses to focus solely on the maternal deaths that occurred. Including this item in similar studies may result in different results from the present study. (4) The difference in the process of determining the causes of maternal death in the included studies is another limitation of this study and this may negatively affect the reliability of the results of this meta-analysis. and (5) The heterogeneity among included studies was considerable in our meta-analysis. There were several possible sources of heterogeneity, including differences in the method of assigning the cause of death, the study design, the sample size, or the country classification. We employed the random-effects model technique to reduce the amount of heterogeneity.

Conclusion

The most prevalent causes of maternal mortality, in descending order, were non-obstetric complications, obstetric hemorrhage, hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, childbirth, and the puerperium, other obstetric complications, pregnancy with abortive outcome, pregnancy-related infection, unanticipated complications of management, unknown/undetermined causes, and coincidental causes. Accurate and timely diagnosis and treatment of conditions complicating pregnancy, childbirth, and the puerperium continue to pose a significant gap in high-quality care for pregnant women worldwide, particularly in developing countries where the incidence is higher.

To reduce the burden of maternal mortality causes, it is crucial to implement effective screening mechanisms for high-risk mothers during pregnancy, childbirth, and the puerperium and apply standard treatment methods. Additionally, increasing awareness and promoting self-care management among women of reproductive age can play a significant role in this regard. Our findings offer comprehensive and standardized information on the prevalence of maternal mortality causes using the ICD-MM classification. This information can be utilized by policymakers and managers at various levels to facilitate necessary planning aimed at reducing the burden of maternal mortality causes.

Data Availability

All data analysed in this study are included within the article and list of references.

Abbreviations

ICD-MM:

The WHO Application of ICD-10 to Deaths During Pregnancy, Childbirth and Puerperium

SID:

Scientific Information Database

STATA:

Statistical Software for Data Sciences

WHO:

World Health Organization

MMR:

Maternal Mortality Ratio

ICD-10:

International Classification of Disease

COD:

Cause of Death

PRISMA:

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis

References

  1. Alipour J, Karimi A, Haghighi MHH, Teshnizi SH, Mehdipour Y. Death certificate errors in three teaching hospitals of Zahedan, southeast of Iran. Death Stud. 2022;46(5):1157–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Alipour J, Karimi A, Miri-Aliabad G, Baloochzahei-Shahbakhsh F, Payandeh A, Sharifian R. Quality of death certificates completion for COVID-19 cases in the southeast of Iran: a cross-sectional study. Health Sci Rep. 2022;5(5):e802.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Karimi A, Sadoughi F, Majdzadeh R. Essential revisions in the maternal mortality surveillance system: lessons learned from a qualitative study. Arch Sicil Med Chir. 2018;4:1111–9.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sadoughi F, Karimi A, Erfannia L. Information management in Iranian maternal mortality surveillance system. Electron Physician. 2017;9(7):4914.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Karimi A, Shahbakhsh F, Nourouzi-Chegani S, Alipour J. Causes of maternal mortalities in educational hospitals of zahedan university of medical sciences with icd-mm approach from 2011 to 2018. Iran J Obstet Gynecol Infertility. 2021;23(12):35–45.

    Google Scholar 

  6. World Health Organization. The WHO application of ICD-10 to deaths during pregnancy, Childbirth and puerperium. ICD-MM: World Health Organization;; 2012.

  7. Verma M, Bano G, Nagar T, Singh AK, Nagar RP. Maternal mortality: a five years retrospective analysis from a Tertiary Care Hospital, Rajasthan, India. J Clin Diagn Res 2022, 16(1).

  8. Zalvand R, Tajvar M, Pourreza A, Asheghi H. Determinants and causes of maternal mortality in Iran based on ICD-MM: a systematic review. Reproductive Health. 2019;16(1):1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sitaula S, Basnet T, Agrawal A, Manandhar T, Das D, Shrestha P. Prevalence and risk factors for maternal mortality at a tertiary care centre in Eastern Nepal- retrospective cross sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):471.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Meh C, Sharma A, Ram U, Fadel S, Correa N, Snelgrove J, Shah P, Begum R, Shah M, Hana T. Trends in maternal mortality in India over two decades in nationally representative surveys. BJOG. 2022;129(4):550–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kolleh EM, Bestman PL, Bajinka O, Weamie JYS. Maternal mortality and its risk factors in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Clin Obs Gyn Res. 2021;2(1):1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  12. World Health O, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United. Trends in maternal mortality 2000 to 2017: estimates by WHO, Nations Population Division: executive summary. In. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019.

  13. Maternal mortality. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/maternal-mortality.

  14. Maternal mortality. https://www.who.int/europe/news-room/fact-sheets/item/maternal-mortality].

  15. Musarandega R, Ngwenya S, Murewanhema G, Machekano R, Magwali T, Nystrom L, Pattinson R, Munjanja S. Changes in causes of pregnancy-related and maternal mortality in Zimbabwe 2007-08 to 2018-19: findings from two reproductive age mortality surveys. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nóbrega T, Bruins S, Costeira M. National audit on maternal mortality in Guinea-Bissau, West-Africa: a retrospective observational study of 2020. Trop Doct. 2022. 00494755221119000.

  17. Kodan LR, Verschueren KJ, van Roosmalen J, Kanhai HH, Bloemenkamp KW. Maternal mortality audit in Suriname between 2010 and 2014, a reproductive age mortality survey. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ameh C, Adegoke A, Pattinson R, Van Den Broek N. Using the new ICD-MM classification system for attribution of cause of maternal death—a pilot study. BJOG. 2014;121:32–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sheth TM, Vaishnav PP, Maitra NK. Assessing the new ICD-MM classification for assigning the cause of maternal mortality at a tertiary centre in Western India: a retrospective study. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2019;8(9):3629–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kodan LR, Verschueren KJ, McCaw-Binns AM, Tjon Kon Fat R, Browne JL, Rijken MJ, Bloemenkamp KW. Classifying maternal deaths in Suriname using WHO ICD-MM: different interpretation by physicians, national and international maternal death review committees. Reproductive Health. 2021;18(1):1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Knight M, Nair M, Brocklehurst P, Kenyon S, Neilson J, Shakespeare J, Tuffnell D, Kurinczuk JJ. Examining the impact of introducing ICD-MM on observed trends in maternal mortality rates in the UK 2003–13. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16(1):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, Shekelle P, Stewart LA. Group P-P: Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Reviews. 2015;4(1):1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, Tugwell P. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. In.: Oxford; 2000.

  24. World Bank Group country. classifications by income level. https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/middle-income-countries.

  25. Thulin M. The cost of using exact confidence intervals for a binomial proportion. Electron J Stat. 2014;8(1):817–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Leandro G. Meta-analysis in medical research: the handbook for the understanding and practice of meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons; 2005.

  27. Knight M, Nair M, Brocklehurst P, Kenyon S, Neilson J, Shakespeare J, Tuffnell D, Kurinczuk JJ, on behalf of the M-UKc. : Examining the impact of introducing ICD-MM on observed trends in maternal mortality rates in the UK 2003-13. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2016, 16(1).

  28. Engin-Üstün Y, Sanisoğlu S, Keskin HL, Karaahmetoğlu S, Özcan A, Çelen Ş, Üstün Y, Alkan A, Ongun V, Şencan İ. Changing trends in the Turkish maternal deaths, with a focus on direct and indirect causes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reproductive Biology. 2019;234:21–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Musarandega R, Ngwenya S, Murewanhema G, Machekano R, Magwali T, Nystrom L, Pattinson R, Munjanja S, Chikutiro A, Mahomva A et al. Changes in causes of pregnancy-related and maternal mortality in Zimbabwe 2007-08 to 2018-19: findings from two reproductive age mortality surveys. BMC Public Health 2022, 22(1).

  30. Halder A, Jose R, Vijayselvi R. Maternal mortality and derivations from the WHO Near-Miss tool: an institutional experience over a decade in southern India. J Turkish German Gynecol Association. 2014;15(4):222–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Owolabi H, Ameh CA, Bar-Zeev S, Adaji S, Kachale F, van den Broek N. Establishing cause of maternal death in Malawi via facility-based review and application of the ICD-MM classification. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2014;121:95–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Mgawadere F, Unkels R, Adegoke A, van den Broek N. Measuring maternal mortality using a Reproductive Age Mortality Study (RAMOS). BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2016, 16(1).

  33. Çim N, Elçi E, Sayan S, Elçi GG, Aksin Ş, Yıldızhan R. Trends and causes of maternal mortality in Eastern province of Turkey. Eastern J Med. 2017;22(4):191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Aikpitanyi J, Ohenhen V, Ugbodaga P, Ojemhen B, Omo-Omorodion BI, Ntoimo LF, Imongan W, Balogun JA, Okonofua FE. Maternal death review and surveillance: the case of central hospital, Benin City, Nigeria. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(12):e0226075.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Barzegar A, Hedayatshodeh M, Forouzesh M, Ghadipasha M, Shojaei P, Fallah F. Causes of maternal mortality in Tehran, Iran. Int J Med Toxicol Forensic Med. 2019;9(4):283–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Agrawal N, Chaudhari HK. Audit on maternal mortality in a tertiary care centre in India of 6 years, a retrospective analysis. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2020;9(2):499–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kumari S, Kapoor G, Sharma M, Bajaj B, Dewan R. NATH B: Study of maternal Near Miss and maternal mortality in a Tertiary Care Hospital. J Clin Diagn Res 2020, 14(4).

  38. Mohammed HM, Shiaa NR, Hussein RA-A. Maternal mortality in Basra city from 2014 to 2018. 2020.

  39. Said A, Malqvist M, Pembe AB, Massawe S, Hanson C. Causes of maternal deaths and delays in care: comparison between routine maternal death surveillance and response system and an obstetrician expert panel in Tanzania. BMC Health Serv Res 2020, 20(1).

  40. Sharma A, Negi K, Sood R. A retrospective analysis: maternal mortality at a tertiary care centre in a hilly state of India. Manage (Pulmonary embolism/odema). 2020;4(4):82–4.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Akaba GO, Nnodu OE, Ryan N, Peprah E, Agida TE, Anumba DO, Ekele BA. Applying the WHO ICD-MM classification system to maternal deaths in a tertiary hospital in Nigeria: a retrospective analysis from 2014–2018. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(1):e0244984.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Aukes AM, Arion K, Bone JN, Li J, Vidler M, Bellad MB, Charantimath U, Goudar SS, Hoodbhoy Z, Katageri G. Causes and circumstances of maternal death: a secondary analysis of the community-level interventions for pre-eclampsia (CLIP) trials cohort. The Lancet Global Health. 2021;9(9):e1242–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Ekka AR, Jogi SR. Classification of maternal mortality by ICD-MM: a retrospective study from a tertiary care hospital of Chhattisgarh. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2021;10(2):492–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Indarti J, Solihin A, Suastika AV, Wardhani DP, Ramadhani MT, Afdi QF, Syafitri SM, Ikhsan M, Alda K. Three-Delay model on maternal mortality cases in Tertiary Referral Hospital in Indonesia. eJournal Kedokteran Indonesia. 2021;9(2):99–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Jogi SR, Ekka AR. Maternal mortality review by three delay model: a retrospective study from a tertiary care hospital of Chhattisgarh. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2021;10(1):262–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Kodan LR, Verschueren KJC, McCaw-Binns AM, Fat RTK, Browne JL, Rijken MJ, Bloemenkamp KWM. Classifying maternal deaths in Suriname using WHO ICD-MM: different interpretation by Physicians, National and International Maternal Death Review Committees. Reproductive Health 2021, 18(1).

  47. Sarmalkar MS, Nayak AH, Faisal S. A five-year retrospective study of maternal mortality in a tertiary referral centre. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2021;10(5):1935–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Aghajani F, Maajani K, Nakhostin-Ansari A, Maleki-Hajiagha A, Aghajani R, Tehranian A. Maternal mortality and its determining factors among hospitalised mothers in Tehran, Iran, 2013–2020. J Obstet Gynaecol 2022:1–6.

  49. Kea AZ, Lindtjørn B, Tekle AG, HINDERAKER SG. Variation in maternal mortality in Sidama Regional State, southern Ethiopia: A population based cross sectional household survey. medRxiv 2022.

  50. Ameh CA, Meka RJ, West F, Dickinson F, Allott H, Godia P. A synthesis of clinical and health system bottlenecks to implementing new WHO postpartum Hemorrhage recommendations: secondary data analysis of the Kenya Confidential Enquiry into maternal deaths 2014–2017. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022;158(Suppl 1):14–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Almutairi WM. Literature Review: physiological management for preventing Postpartum Hemorrhage. Healthc (Basel) 2021, 9(6).

  52. McLintock C. Prevention and treatment of postpartum Hemorrhage: focus on hematological aspects of management. Hematol Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2020;2020(1):542–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Hawkins JL. Obstetric Hemorrhage. Anesthesiol Clin. 2020;38(4):839–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Harvey CJ. Evidence-based strategies for Maternal Stabilization and Rescue in Obstetric Hemorrhage. AACN Adv Crit Care. 2018;29(3):284–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Jones AJ, Federspiel JJ, Eke AC. Preventing postpartum Hemorrhage with combined therapy rather than oxytocin alone. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023;5(2s):100731.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Manyahi JR, Mgaya H, Said A. Maternal near miss and mortality attributable to hypertensive disorders in a tertiary hospital, Tanzania; a cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):301.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Keskinkılıç B, Engin-Üstün Y, Sanisoğlu S, Şahin Uygur D, Keskin HL, Karaahmetoğlu S, Özcan A, Esen M, Alkan A, Kabasakal A, et al. Maternal mortality due to hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, Childbirth, and the puerperium between 2012 and 2015 in Turkey: a nation-based study. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2017;18(1):20–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Boutin A, Cherian A, Liauw J, Dzakpasu S, Scott H, Van den Hof M, Cook J, Blake J, Joseph KS. Database autopsy: an efficient and effective Confidential Enquiry into maternal deaths in Canada. J Obstet Gynecol Can. 2021;43(1):58–66e54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Shirazi M, Sahebdel B, Torkzaban M, Feizabad E, Ghaemi M. Maternal mortality following thromboembolism; incidences and prophylaxis strategies. Thromb J. 2020;18(1):36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Rath WH, Stelzl P. Strategies for the prevention of maternal death from venous thromboembolism clinical recommendations based on current literature. J Perinat Med. 2023;51(2):213–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Kurjak A, Stanojević M, Dudenhausen J. Why maternal mortality in the world remains tragedy in low-income countries and shame for high-income ones: will sustainable development goals (SDG) help? J Perinat Med. 2023;51(2):170–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Latt SM, Milner A, Kavanagh A. Abortion laws reform may reduce maternal mortality: an ecological study in 162 countries. BMC Womens Health. 2019;19(1):1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Say L, Chou D, Gemmill A, Tunçalp Ö, Moller AB, Daniels J, Gülmezoglu AM, Temmerman M, Alkema L. Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2014;2(6):e323–333.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Okafor O, Roos N, Abdosh AA, Adesina O, Alaoui Z, Romero WA, Assarag B, Aworinde O, de Bernis L, Castro R, et al. International virtual confidential reviews of infection-related maternal deaths and near-miss in 11 low- and middle-income countries – case report series and suggested actions. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022;22(1):431.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Health Human Resources Research Center, School of Health Management & Information Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

    Jahanpour Alipour

  2. Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine Research Center, Research Institute of Cellular and Molecular Sciences in Infectious Diseases, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran

    Abolfazl Payandeh

  3. Pregnancy Health Research Center, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran

    Afsaneh Karimi

Authors
  1. Jahanpour Alipour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Abolfazl Payandeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Afsaneh Karimi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JA designed the study; screened titles and abstracts; conducted a full-text review; assessed the quality of each study; interpreted the data and review the manuscript. AK designed the study; screened titles and abstracts; conducted a full-text review; assessed the quality of each study; interpreted the data and review the manuscript. AP designed the study; interpreted the data and reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Afsaneh Karimi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

: Appendix A - Search Strategy

Supplementary Material 2

: Appendix B - Data Extraction Form

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alipour, J., Payandeh, A. & Karimi, A. Prevalence of maternal mortality causes based on ICD-MM: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 23, 821 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-06142-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-06142-y

Keywords

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

ISSN: 1471-2393

Contact us