Skip to main content

The effect of midwife-oriented breastfeeding counseling on self-efficacy and performance of adolescent mothers: a clinical trial study



Breastfeeding behaviors are strongly influenced by self-efficacy. This research aimed to determine the effect of breastfeeding counseling based on the Ready Set Baby (RSB) education program on self-efficacy and breastfeeding performance in adolescent mothers.


In 2022, a parallel randomized clinical trial was carried out in Hamadan city's comprehensive health centers, involving 64 pregnant teenagers. The block randomization method was employed to divide the participants into two groups. The data collection instruments were a demographic characteristics questionnaire, a breastfeeding self-efficacy questionnaire, and the Bristol breastfeeding checklist. Three individual counseling sessions during pregnancy were conducted based on the "RSB" program. The ANCOVA was used for comparing groups. The statistical analyst was blinded to the group assignment.


The study included 64 participants with a mean age of 16.97(1.30) years, data from 60 participants were analyzed. The demographic and clinical characteristics of the two groups were relatively similar (P > 0.05). Following the intervention, self-efficacy and breastfeeding performance scores were measured and adjusted for confounding factors. The mean scores for self-efficacy were 116.03(20.64) and 100.02(20.64) (P < 0.005), with effect size 0.77 [MD = 16.01 (95% CI: 5.34,26.67)], and the mean scores for breastfeeding performance were 6.30(2.07) and 4.12(2.07) (P < 0.002), with effect size 1.05 [MD = 2.18 (95% CI: 1.11,3.24)] in the intervention and control groups, respectively.


The Ready Set Baby education program's breastfeeding counseling for primiparous adolescent pregnant women significantly boosted their self-efficacy and performance in breastfeeding. Given the crucial role of breastfeeding in ensuring the well-being of both mother and child, further research is imperative to identify suitable and impactful interventions that can encourage breastfeeding practices among adolescents.

Trial registration

The trial protocol of this study has been registered in Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials at 08/09/2021. The registration reference is IRCT20200530047596N3.

Peer Review reports


Adolescent pregnancy poses a significant challenge in numerous regions across the globe [1], resulting in adverse health and socioeconomic outcomes for the individual, family, and society. According to the World Health Organization, adolescence spans from 10 to 19 years old [2]. In countries with low or middle-income economies, approximately 21 million pregnancies annually occur among individuals aged 15 to 19 in 2019. Adolescent mothers face risks such as premature birth, underweight newborn, and critical neonatal states during and after pregnancy [3].

Annually, over 820,000 children are saved through the consumption of human milk, resulting in savings of over 300 billion dollars [4]. The World Health Assembly has set a goal of achieving an exclusive breastfeeding rate of at least 50% for infants under 6 months by 2025. However, between 2010 and 2018, this rate was only 45.7% in 57 low-income or middle-income economies [5]. Adolescent mothers have been found to have lower breastfeeding rates than older mothers [6]. Therefore, they require additional support [7]. Breastfeeding self-efficacy (BSE), a mother's confidence in her ability to breastfeed her newborn [8], is a critical factor in exclusive breastfeeding and breastfeeding duration [9]. Unfortunately, many first-time breastfeeding mothers lack the necessary knowledge and self-efficacy [10], particularly adolescent mothers who have been found to have lower BSE than other age groups [11]. A study showed that BSE is the primary factor affecting exclusive breastfeeding in adolescent mothers [12]. Educational and supportive interventions can effectively increase exclusive breastfeeding and BSE [8, 13]. Breastfeeding counseling by healthcare providers significantly contributes to breastfeeding performance [14]. Some literature has reported the beneficial impact of breastfeeding counseling and other interventions on continued exclusive breastfeeding, self-efficacy, and breastfeeding performance in non-teenage mothers [10, 15,16,17].

Studies have shown that implementing the Ready Set Baby (RSB) counseling approach, both individually and in groups, before birth has improved breastfeeding goals. RSB is a program designed to educate women on the benefits and proper handling of breastfeeding [18]. However, research has indicated a need to increase breastfeeding self-efficacy (BSE) in teenage mothers, which should be explored within midwifery practices [12]. The majority of studies on this topic have focused on non-teenage mothers.

As mentioned, improving self-efficacy has a positive effect on exclusive breastfeeding and breastfeeding duration. Improving the breastfeeding self-efficacy and performance of the mother, especially adolescent mothers, is effective on newborn outcomes, including saving the baby's life, as well as economic savings, so the authors of this article conducted this research intending to determine the effect of prenatal counseling based on the Ready Set Baby education program on self-efficacy and breastfeeding performance in adolescent mothers.


This two-group randomized clinical trial study with a parallel design was conducted between September 2021 and November 2022.


This study was conducted on nulliparous women under 19 years who received prenatal care in comprehensive health centers in Hamadan, in the west of Iran. The inclusion criteria were gestational age 30–33 weeks, a healthy singleton fetus, no high-risk pregnancy, literacy at sixth grade level (end of elementary school), living independently with her husband, and not suffering from physical and mental illnesses. Exclusion criteria were the presence of a known abnormality in the newborn or a problem in the mother's breast preventing breastfeeding, giving birth before week 37, and the occurrence of an unfortunate event (such as the newborn death, divorce, and loss of loved ones) during the study.


Based on the self-efficacy variable that was the primary outcome of this study, taking into account the alpha = 0.050, power = 0.90, m1 = 46.7, m2 = 52.9, sd1 = 6.5, sd2 = 7.0 and attrition rate of 25%, using the Sampsi module in Stata-13 software, the number of samples was determined to be 32 people in each group [19]. The randomization sequence was determined by one of the researchers, the student's supervisor, using permutation blocks of 4 by Random allocation software. After determining the sequence, 64 opaque envelopes were prepared in which the determined sequence was placed and numbered from 1 to 64. During the sampling, the envelopes were opened in order of number and the person was assigned to the designated group.Therefore, the researcher who did the sampling was not aware of the order of the sequence.

The sampling setting was all comprehensive health centers of Hamedan City (36 centers). All pregnant women in the city are covered by these 36 centers. Using the Integrated Health Software (Sib), the researcher identified adolescent pregnant mothers (between 0–5 cases were identified in each center). A total of 119 mothers were identified, and after checking the inclusion criteria, 64 mothers were included in the study. The participants were then randomly assigned to either the intervention or control group using numbered envelopes. Four individuals were excluded from the study, leaving a sample size of 60 for analysis (3 people due to premature birth and one person due to intrauterine death). Notably, the statistical analyst was blinded to the group allocation (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

CONSORT flow diagram

Intervention and data collection method

After identifying the eligible people, in the 30th week of pregnancy, one of the researchers contacted the mother and explained the objectives of the study. The research sample was present at the comprehensive health center in the 30–33 week of pregnancy (in accordance with routine pregnancy care). At the time of registration of this trial, the following times were determined for intervention (the first session in weeks 31 to 34—the second session in weeks 35–37—the third session in weeks 38 to 40). Before the start of the intervention, the researchers concluded that some mothers may give birth at 38 weeks (before they received the third counseling session). Therefore, the time of the third session was changed to week 36–38, according to which, the time of the first and second session was also changed.

After that, the participants were assigned to the intervention or control group according to the envelope number. They were then asked to complete a demographic-clinical questionnaire and the breastfeeding self-efficacy scale (BSES). If the person was in the intervention group, the first counseling session was conducted by a researcher who was a master's student in midwifery counseling with ample experience in the delivery unit and breastfeeding counseling; then arrangements were made to participate in the next sessions. she provided three individual, face-to-face counseling sessions lasting 60–90 min in one of the rooms of the comprehensive health center. Before each session, the participants were contacted by phone to coordinate the next session, and if they had any questions, the researcher answered them. In total, each person was contacted twice.

The counseling was based on the Ready Set Baby curriculum, which includes a 28-page color booklet divided into four sections and a flip chart. The materials cover 14 subject headings at a sixth-grade reading level and are taught by a counselor. The counseling sessions were personalized to the individual needs and interests of the participants, with the counselor asking questions before each topic to determine their thoughts and adjust the discussion accordingly [18] (Table 1).

Table1 Counseling sessions

Counseling was provided according to GATHER counseling principles in each session. The GATHER principles are “Greet”: warm and friendly communication and welcoming the woman. “Ask”: interaction with the woman and ask her about that session's topic. “Tell”: giving information and explanation about that session's topic. “Help”: Helping her to make the best choices. “Explain”: more explanation about the topic, and “Return”: follow up of the woman in the next sessions.

The content of the RSB program was examined and endorsed by five faculty members from the Hamadan School of Nursing and Midwifery. The control group received regular care, and both groups filled out the BSES questionnaire after the third session at the age of 38–36 weeks. Moreover, the researcher evaluated the mothers from both groups using the (Breastfeeding Assessment Tool) BBAT on the 3rd to 5th day post-delivery.

Data collection tools

This study utilized various tools, such as demographic-clinical questionnaires, BSES, and BBAT. The demographic-clinical questionnaire consisted of questions about the woman's age, education, and occupation, as well as her spouse's age, education, and occupation. Additionally, the questionnaire included information on the body mass index, monthly income, gestational age upon entering the study, newborn gender, birth weight, type of birth, and gestational age at the time of delivery. To ensure the validity of the demographic questionnaire, the content validity method was employed, which involved soliciting feedback from ten Hamadan University of Medical Sciences members and incorporating their revised opinions.

The BSES was utilized to measure self-efficacy, consisting of 33 items graded on a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5, indicating "I completely disagree" to "I completely agree," respectively [20]. A score between 33 to 76 indicated low self-efficacy, 77 to 121 indicated medium, and 121 to 165 indicated high self-efficacy [16]. The tool's reliability was established with a Cronbach alpha coefficient of 0.96 [20] in a previous study and 0.98 in the current study. The reliability of the BSES (0.82) was reported by Parsa et al. in Iran [21]. The BBAT measured breastfeeding performance on days 3 to 5 postpartum. This tool had four items, including "position," "attachment," "sucking," and "swallowing," each scored between 0 and 2 points on a 3-point Likert scale. Higher scores denoted more successful breastfeeding. The questionnaire's reliability was demonstrated with an alpha coefficient of 0.83 in a previous study [22] and a correlation coefficient of r = 0.86 in the current study, determined using the evaluation method by two assessors.

Statistical analysis

Stata-13 software was used for data analysis. Central and dispersion indicators, frequencies, percentages, and tables described variables. The normal distribution of quantitative data was examined using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Demographic variables between the two groups were compared by independent t-test, Mann–Whitney U test, Chi-square, and Fisher’s exact tests. The differences in self-efficacy scores and breastfeeding performance between the two groups were evaluated by the analysis of variance (ANCOVA). A significant level of P < 0.05 was considered in all statistical tests.


The study involved participants who were all homemakers with a mean age of 16.97(1.30) years. Upon entering the study, the mean gestational age of the samples was 32.45(1.04) weeks, and they were monitored until 3.53(0.76) days postpartum. The demographic and clinical characteristics of the two groups were relatively similar (P > 0.05). However, there was a significant difference in the mean neonatal weight between the groups, which was taken into account in the statistical analyses (Table 2).

Table 2 Characteristics of participants

The ANCOVA was used to comparing of self-efficacy and breastfeeding performance between two groups with controlling the effects of pre-intervention scores and newborns' weight. Results indicated a significantly lower mean score in BSE in the control group compared to the intervention group after intervention (P = 0.005), the mean difference (MD) = 16.01 (95% CI: 5.34,26.67), and the mean score of breastfeeding performance in the intervention group (6.30 ± 2.07), MD = 2.18 (95% CI: 1.11,3.24) was significantly higher than the control group (4.12 ± 2.07) (P = 0.001). Effect sizes were calculated for BSE and breastfeeding performance, with values of 0.77 (95% CI, 0.24,1.29) and 1.05 (95% CI, 0.5,1.5), respectively. These effect sizes suggest a substantial difference in self-efficacy and breastfeeding performance between the two groups (Table 3).

Table 3 Comparing of self-efficacy and breastfeeding performance between two groups


This study determined the effect of breastfeeding counseling with the RSB counseling approach on breastfeeding self-efficacy and performance in primiparous teenagers. The results indicated that counseling with the RSB approach increased BSE and improved breastfeeding performance in primiparous teenage mothers. Self-efficacy is a critical factor in exclusive breastfeeding and breastfeeding duration [19]. In this study, BSE in both groups was moderate before the intervention. Mofi et al. showed that breastfeeding self-efficacy was not optimal after childbirth [23]. Eslami et al. reported BSE was lower in younger mothers, and maternal age was a predictor of BSE, so that mothers aged under 19 years showed lower BSE [11]. Adolescents have a lower breastfeeding rate than older mothers [19]. Inexperience in breastfeeding and low education levels in primiparous teenage mothers are associated with lower self-efficacy [24]. Therefore, counseling support is more necessary for them [11].

In the present study, BSE and breastfeeding performance improved significantly after three counseling sessions in the third trimester of pregnancy. Aghababaei et al. claimed that individual counseling increased BSE in women aged 18–35 [16]. In their study four counseling sessions (one session at the end of pregnancy and three sessions after delivery) were held.

Shafaei et al. showed that prenatal group counseling could increase self-efficacy during breastfeeding and solve most breastfeeding problems in the postpartum period [15]. Although the exact time of intervention during pregnancy is not mentioned in their study, it shows the positive impact of counseling during pregnancy on BSE, the same as ours. Parsa et al. showed that self-efficacy and the continuity of exclusive breastfeeding increased in primiparous mothers in the fourth month of counseling with the GATHER model for four sessions during the first month after childbirth [21]. Compared to this study, the counseling sessions were held before birth in the present study. Prenatal counseling is advantageous as the mother is ready to start breastfeeding after childbirth, which can affect her breastfeeding consequences in the future.

Cantin et al. mentioned that a breastfeeding education program (about 13 training sessions) improves breastfeeding self-efficacy, knowledge, self-confidence, and satisfaction with teenagers in breastfeeding [19]. Self-efficacy increased significantly with three counseling sessions using the RBS approach in the present study. Therefore, it can be argued that BSE can be increased in teenagers with fewer sessions, and this result can be used for planning in this field.

Parry et al. showed that using the RSB counseling approach in group or individual prenatal counseling sessions improved breastfeeding tendencies and increased breastfeeding knowledge, early initiation of breastfeeding, and breastfeeding continuity and exclusivity [18]. In their study, counseling was done by a doctor, physician, resident physician, registered dietitian, nurse, and lactation professional; The consultation time was reportedly less than 15 min to more than 60 min, and the consultation was made only once in women aged over 18 years with a gestational age of 32 weeks. The RSB counseling approach was considered to be appropriate by all participants, and 88% considered the intervention time to be appropriate at that gestational age. The less time allocation to counseling in their study might be because of older participants' age. Javorski et al. reported that using a flip chart as an educational tool positively affected BSE and maintaining exclusive breastfeeding [25]. In our study, using flip charts also influenced breastfeeding counseling for teenagers.

Bhat et al. showed that 59% of mothers used the wrong breastfeeding way, indicating the need for a counseling support system to improve breastfeeding performance [26]. Lack of breastfeeding education and counseling during pregnancy causes early cessation of breastfeeding. Increasing mothers' knowledge of breastfeeding improves their performance [27]. Parsa et al. evidenced a positive effect of postpartum breastfeeding counseling on the mother's breastfeeding performance [17]. In their study, four breastfeeding counseling sessions after delivery could improve breastfeeding performance in the 4th month after delivery. While in the present study, prenatal counseling led to improved performance in the first days after childbirth, which are critical days in terms of the initiation and continuation of breastfeeding.Javorski et al. showed an educational intervention using a flip chart in the second, fourth, and eighth weeks after birth positively influenced maintaining exclusive breastfeeding [25]. It can be concluded that the use of educational tools both before and after childbirth can positively affect breastfeeding performance.

One of the limitations of this research was the carelessness of participants during counseling due to their young age, low literacy level, and unfamiliarity with breastfeeding. So, the authors tried to overcome this limitation by allocating more time, using more straightforward language, flip charts, and providing educational pamphlets in simple language. Another limitation of this study is that the intervention's impact on infant outcomes, including the proportion of exclusive breastfeeding, the timing of the first feed, weight trends, and post-discharge feeding patterns, weren’t measured. An advantage of this study is the research on teenagers, who have not been sufficiently studied to improve their breastfeeding performance despite their poor breastfeeding consequences. Another benefit is the intervention before giving birth, which helps the woman to start breastfeeding with more self-efficacy and to have a more appropriate performance from early breastfeeding. Moreover, using the GATHER method and the RSB model in counseling teenagers showed that a comprehensive approach to education could effectively promote BSE in them. It was tried to increase the generalizability of the results by providing details on the samples, the location and the method.


The study showed that counseling with the RSB approach during the prenatal period increased the level of BSE and improved breastfeeding performance among nulliparous teenagers. As a result, it is advisable to create a customized counseling program for teenagers during pregnancy to help them begin breastfeeding with higher self-efficacy and improved performance.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.



Ready Set BABY


Exclusive breastfeeding


Breastfeeding self-efficacy


Breastfeeding self-efficacy Scale


Bristol Breastfeeding Assessment Tool


  1. Wado YD, Sully EA, Mumah JN. Pregnancy and early motherhood among adolescents in five East African countries: a multi-level analysis of risk and protective factors. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019.

  2. Adolescent health. World Health Organization Website. 2023. Accessed 18 Mar 2023.

  3. Okeke SR, Idriss-Wheeler D, Yaya S. Adolescent pregnancy in the time of COVID-19: what are the implications for sexual and reproductive health and rights globally? Reprod Health. 2022.

  4. North K, Gao M, Allen G, Lee A. Breastfeeding in a global context: epidemiology, impact, and future directions. Clin Ther. 2022.

  5. Wu H, Zhao M, Magnussen CG, Xi B. Global prevalence of WHO infant feeding practices in 57 LMICs in 2010–2018 and time trends since 2000 for 44 LMICs. EClinicalMedicine. 2021.

  6. Corsack C, Wallenborn JT, Harley KG, Eskenazi B. Parental cohabitation and breastfeeding outcomes among united states adolescent mothers. Breastfeed Med. 2022.

  7. Werdani KE, Rumiati F, Kusumawati Y, Manaf RA. Social capital and exclusive breastfeeding practice among teenage mothers. EurAsian Journal of Biosciences. 2020;14:5323–30.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gonzales AM. Breastfeeding self-efficacy in Asia and Pacific: scoping review. Nurs Pract Today. 2021.

  9. Khorshidifard M, Sadat Z, Shabanian M, Nasiri S. The relationship between childbirth satisfaction and breastfeeding self-efficacy in women referring to comprehensive health centers in Kashan. Armaghane Danesh. 2022;27:84–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ghasemi V, Simbar M, Banaei M, Saei Ghare Naz M, Jahani Z, Nazem H. The effect of interventions on breastfeeding self-efficacy by using Bandura's theory in Iranian mothers: a systematic review. Int J Pediatr. 2019.

  11. Eslami E, Pakseresht S, Niknami M, Atrkar Roshan Z. Comparison of breastfeeding self-efficacy in mothers with different ages. J Holist Nurs Midwifery. 2020.

  12. Khonsung P, Yimyam S, Xuto P, Chaloumsuk N. Factors predicting exclusive breastfeeding among Thai adolescent mothers at 6-months postpartum. Pac Rim Int J Nurs Res. 2021;25:34–47.

    Google Scholar 

  13. . Wong MS, Mou H, Chien WT. Effectiveness of educational and supportive intervention for primiparous women on breastfeeding related outcomes and breastfeeding self-efficacy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2021.

  14. Dukuzumuremyi JPC, Acheampong K, Abesig J, Luo J. Knowledge, attitude, and practice of exclusive breastfeeding among mothers in East Africa: a systematic review. Int Breastfeed J. 2020.

  15. Shafaei FS, Mirghafourvand M, Havizari S. The effect of prenatal counseling on breastfeeding self-efficacy and frequency of breastfeeding problems in mothers with previous unsuccessful breastfeeding: A randomized controlled clinical trial. BMC women's health. 2020.

  16. Aghababaei S, Khodakarami B, Farhadian M, Kamali M. Effectivness of counseling on mother's breastfeeding self-efficacy. Avicenna J Nurs Midwifery Care. 2020.

  17. Parsa P, Khodabaneloo R, Soltani F, Mohamadi Y. The Use of Bristol's tool in lactation counseling and its impact on the breastfeeding status in primiparous mothers undergone cesarean section. Avicenna J Nurs Midwifery Care. 2020.

  18. Parry KC, Tully KP, Hopper LN, Schildkamp PE, Labbok MH. Evaluation of ready, Set, BABY: a prenatal breastfeeding education and counseling approach. Birth. 2019.

  19. Cantin CM, Peterson WE, Agarwal A, Hamid JS, Stortini B, Fleming N. A cohort study: evaluating self-efficacy in adolescents attending a tailored youth-informed breastfeeding program. medRxiv. 2020.

  20. Dennis CLE. Identifying predictors of breastfeeding self‐efficacy in the immediate postpartum period. Res Nurs Health. 2006.

  21. Parsa P, Boojar A, Roshanaei G, Bakht R. The Effect breastfeeding counseling on self-efficacy and continuation breastfeeding among primiparous mothers: a randomised clinical trial. Avicenna J Nurs Midwifery Care. 2016.

  22. Balaguer-Martínez JV, Esquivel-Ojeda JN, Valcarce-Pérez I, Ciriza-Barea E, García-Sotro C, López-Santiveri A, et al. Translation to Spanish and validation of a scale for the observation of breastfeeding: The Bristol Breastfeeding Assessment Tool. An Pediatr. 2022.

  23. Moafi F, Asgari S, Yekefalah Z, Momeni M, Hajnasiri H. Assessment of breastfeeding self-efficacy and patterns and its predictors in mothers living in Qazvin province. The J Urmia Nurs Midwifery Fac. 2018;15:777–87.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Poorshaban F, Pakseresht S, Bostani Khalesi Z, KazemNejad Leili E. Factors associated with breastfeeding self-efficacy of mothers within 6 weeks of delivery. J Holist Nurs Midwifery. 2017.

  25. Javorski M, Rodrigues AJ, Dodt RCM, Almeida PCd, Leal LP, Ximenes LB. Effects of an educational technology on self-efficacy for breastfeeding and practice of exclusive breastfeeding. Rev Esc Enferm. 2018.

  26. Bhat A, Raddi S, Sawant P. Breastfeeding techniques among primiparous women. Int J Nurs Educ. 2019.

  27. Ingram J, Johnson D, Copeland M, Churchill C, Taylor H. The development of a new breast feeding assessment tool and the relationship with breast feeding self-efficacy. Midwifery. 2015.

  28. General Assembly of the World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. J Am Coll Dent. 2014;81:14–8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references


This article is obtained from a master's thesis in counseling in midwifery, the grant number 140007205807. The authors are grateful to the Institutional Review Board of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, the staffs of Hamadan health centers, and the participating mothers, who facilitated the research implementation with their cooperation.


This work was supported by Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, grant number 140007205807.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



SH contributed to conception and design, development of methodology, drafting of the manuscript, and study supervision. MR contributed to conception and design, development of methodology, interpretation of data, drafting and revision of the manuscript. FK development of methodology, analysis and interpretation of data, and drafting and revision of the manuscript. SZM contributed to conception and design, drafting and revision of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mansoureh Refaei.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The ethics committee of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences has accepted this study with ethics code IR.UMSHA.REC.1400.447. The research adhered to all ethical principles outlined in Helsinki 2013 [28]. All participants and their parents or guardians signed informed consent forms. After completing the questionnaires, the control group was provided with the content of counseling sessions.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fahim, S.H., Kazemi, F., Masoumi, S.Z. et al. The effect of midwife-oriented breastfeeding counseling on self-efficacy and performance of adolescent mothers: a clinical trial study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 23, 672 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Breast feeding
  • Counseling
  • Self-efficacy
  • Adolescent