Skip to main content

Successful post-term pregnancy in scared bicornuate uterus: case report

Abstract

Pregnancies in the bicornuate uterus are usually considered high-risk because of their association with poor reproductive outcomes such as recurrent pregnancy loss, cervical insufficiency, low birthweight, preterm birth, malpresentation, cesarean delivery, and uterine rupture. The objective of the report was to show that patients with a scared bicornuate uterus at post-term could have successful pregnancy outcomes. We are presenting a 28-year-old gravida III para II lady with a bicornuate scared uterus at post-term. She has a history of early third-trimester pregnancy loss, and her second pregnancy was delivered via cesarean section. In her first pregnancy, the patient's uterus was not identified as bicornuate. However, an ultrasound during her second pregnancy revealed that she had a bicornuate uterus, which led to the diagnosis. At term, the lady had a successful cesarean section. Lastly, for the current post-term pregnancy she had no prenatal check-up. Even though this, she was coming at the latent first stage of labor and an emergency cesarean section was done.

Conclusion Successful outcomes could be achieved in patients with the bicornuate uterus at post-term gestation.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

The normal development of the reproductive organ of a female involves a series of complex processes characterized by the differentiation, migration, fusion, and subsequent canalization of the Müllerian system [1]. Abnormalities of the uterus may be congenital or acquired and typically present with menstrual dysfunction, pelvic pain, infertility, or early pregnancy loss [2]. Congenital uterine anomalies result from the abnormal formation, fusion, or resorption of Müllerian ducts during fetal life [3]. The bicornuate uterus is one of the Müllerian defects in which the fundus is indented (arbitrarily defined as ≥ 1 cm) and the vagina is generally normal [4].

A bicornuate uterus results from an incomplete fusion of the Mullerian ducts at the level of the uterine fundus, leading to two separates but communicating endometrial cavities and a single cervix. By using ultrasound bicornuate uterus is differentiated from septate uterus. The findings in the case of the septate uterus are two closely separated endometrial cavities and a smooth fundal contour (by contrast, the bicornuate uterus has an indented fundus). The depth from the interstitial line to the apex of the indentation is > 1 cm, and the angle of indentation is > 105 degrees [5].

The incidence of congenital uterine anomalies is difficult to determine since many women with such anomalies are not diagnosed, especially if they are asymptomatic [2]. The estimated prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies range from 5% in the general population [6] increasing up to more than 25% in women with recurrent miscarriage [7]. Bicornuate uterus is one of the most prevalent congenital Mullerian anomalies after arcuate uterus and uterine septum [8]. In a large review report including a combined population of infertile and fertile women, the frequency of anomalies by type was: septate (35%), bicornuate (26%), arcuate (18%), unicornuate (10%), didelphys (8%), and agenesis (3%) [9]. However, these proportions can vary substantially depending upon the specific population studied and the methodology used to identify the abnormalities [10].

Congenital uterine anomalies are strongly associated with recurrent pregnancy loss, low birth weight, preterm birth, malpresentation, cesarean delivery, and uterine rupture [11,12,13]. Similarly, a bicornuate uterus carries increased risks for adverse obstetrical outcomes that include miscarriage, preterm birth, malpresentation, and uterine rupture [11]. Uterine rupture in a primigravid patient with an unscarred bicornuate uterus at term is reported [10, 14]. A bicornuate uterus is an independent risk factor for cervical Os insufficiency. This is an important finding due to the burden of the risk for mid-trimester pre-viable birth associated with cervical incompetence [15]. We are not surprised only by the case of post-term pregnancy in the bicornuate uterus but also by having an intact bicornuate uterus with a previous cesarean scar at post-term (42+5 weeks gestational age).

Patient information and findings

A 28-year-old gravida III Para II (one alive, one stillbirth) illiterate housewife with a diagnosis of the latent first stage of labor, a previous caesarean scar, and breech presentation was referred from Fetra Health Center. In 2016, she gave birth to a female fetus weighing 1.1 kg at a gestational age (GA) of 28 weeks from the last normal menstrual period at Fetra health center. In 2019 she was coming with the second pregnancy at Fetra health center at the latent first stage of labor and was referred to Enat hospital with an assessment of transverse lie. She was found to have a bicornuate unicollis uterus at Enat Hospital by ultrasonography with transverse lying, and the fetus was found to be in the right horn of a bicornuate uterus. Emergency cesarean section was done to effect a 2.5 kg male alive neonate with an APGAR score of 6 and 8 in the first and fifth minutes. She had a smooth post-operative recovery and was discharged on the fourth day of the operation with a brief description of the procedure and strong advice about the next pregnancy, place and mode of delivery.

By now, (in 2022), she was referred with the above diagnosis (Latent first stage of labor + Previous cesarean scar + Breech presentation) from the health center. During her pregnancy, she had no antenatal care (ANC) contact. Her first day of regular last normal menstrual period (LNMP) was on September 11/2021 making her GA = 42+5 weeks. Ultrasonography revealed that the fetus was found to be in the right horn of a bicornuate uterus with a transverse lie (shoulder presentation). It also revealed that an amniotic fluid index of 6 cm, and grade three placental calcification. The depth of the indentation is 4 cm, and the angle of indentation is around 120 degrees.

Following informed written consent and spinal anesthesia, an emergency cesarean section was performed to effect a 2.6 kg male alive neonate with an APGAR score of 7 and 9 in the first and fifth minutes, respectively. The cesarean section was done for an indication of latent first stage of labor + transverse lie + bicornuate unicollis scared uterus + post-term. Intraoperative findings: a fetus in the right horn, grade II meconium, and an intact gravid bicornual uterus with a well-formed lower uterine segment. The placenta was anterior and fundal, and both uterine tubes and the ovaries were grossly normal. The estimated blood loss during surgery was 650 ml (Figs. 1 and 2).

Fig. 1
figure 1

The right horn that contained the baby is obviously bigger than the left, posterior wall, 2022

Fig. 2
figure 2

The exteriorized bicornuate uterus showing the cesarean incision on the bicornuate uterus after the delivery of the baby, 2022

The neonate exhibited post-maturity (i.e., dry, loose, and peeling skin, overgrown nails, minimal fat deposit, and wide-eyed). Both the neonate and the mother were discharged home on the fourth day, with an appointment for the 7th post-operative day. The postnatal follow‑up revealed that no abnormality on both the mother and neonate. The mother was counselled on family planning methods, issues related to the next pregnancy; early, and close ANC follow-up. She also counselled about place of delivery and possibility of early uterine rupture in the next pregnancy. Lastly Implanon was provided by her choice and she was discharged from the postnatal clinic.

She has no personal and family history of chronic illness like hypertension, diabetics, renal and cardiac disease.

Result of lab investigation revealed that her Blood group and Rh was A+, her HIV, Hepatitis B virus, and syphilis result is non-reactive and all CBC result was in normal range.

Discussion

Congenital uterine anomalies are strongly associated with recurrent pregnancy loss, low birth weight, preterm birth, malpresentation, cesarean delivery, and uterine rupture [11,12,13]. The bicornuate uterus was previously thought to be associated with infertility [16]. However, as recent studies showed, fertility in women with a bicornuate uterus is unaffected, but gestational capacity is impaired because of the high number of spontaneous abortions, and preterm deliveries [17, 18]. Our case also had a previous early third-trimester pregnancy loss (at GA of 28 weeks). Since viable birth rates progressively increase in young women with a bicornuate uterus and no other factor compromising fertility. After one or two abortions metroplasty is questionable, rather cervical cerclage is attempted to avoid second-trimester abortion or premature delivery [17]. It has been reported that women with a bicornuate uterus and repeated pregnancy losses may benefit more from metroplasty than from cerclage [19]. At subsequent pregnancy, the case was coming to term with transverse lie and ultrasound revealed the fetus to be in the right horn of a bicornuate uterus. Emergency cesarean section was done to effect the normal fetus. The inadequate room for rotation can be the explanation for the fetal malpresentation that is associated with bicornuate uterus [20]. Studies revealed that having of neonatal limb deformity after giving a viable fetus [1, 21]. The fetal limb deformity might result from prolonged pressure on the limbs due to a lack of space within the uterine horn where fetal development took place.

Her third pregnancy was in the right horn of a bicornuate uterus with a transverse lie. Under spinal anesthesia emergency cesarean section was done for an indication of transverse lie + bicornuate unicollis scared uterus + post-term, to effect male alive neonate with a feature of post maturity. As in the case presented, several cases of successful pregnancies in the bicornuate uterus had been reported without surgical correction of the anomaly [16, 20]. But as far as our review there was no report of post-term pregnancy with scared bicornuate uterus. Regarding to other complications, uterine rupture in a primigravid patient with an unscarred bicornuate uterus at term is reported. A rupture of the uterus ends up with a cesarean hysterectomy and loss of fertility [10, 14]. In the other case, in term (even preterm) bicornuate pregnant uterus fetal limb deformity might result from prolonged pressure on the limbs due to lack of space within the uterine horn [20]. But in the above-presented case, the bi-cornuate scared gravid uterus was intact with a well-formed lower uterine segment which make the woman lucky.

Transvaginal 3-D ultrasonography (US) appears to be extremely accurate for the diagnosis and classification of congenital uterine anomalies, more than office hysteroscopy and MRI [22]. Detailed examination of the uterine septum using experienced hands, by 3-D US has a high reproducibility for diagnosing uterine anomalies (specially septate and bicornuate uterus) for preoperative planning [23]. In contrast, bicornuate and septate uterine anomalies are less confidently differentiated by traditional 2-D TVS techniques. Ideally, the angle between the two endometrial cavities is ~ 105°for the bicornuate uterus, but 75° for the septate uterus. The fundal shape shows a > 1 cm notch for the bicornuate uterus, but a < l cm notch for the septate uterus [24]. In our case, the finding showed that the depth of the indentation is 4 cm, and the angle of indentation is around 120 degrees. Which is confirmed by actual measurement of indentation using calibrated forceps intraoperatively.

Conclusion

A successful outcome could be achieved in patients with the bicornuate uterus at post-term gestation and if no other factor compromises fertility, the viable birth rate progressively increases for women with a bicornuate uterus.

Limitation

Initially, we didn’t consider the case for the case report, and we lost supporting images of ultrasound.

Patient perspective

I am a 28-year-old illiterate housewife. I knew since I have an abnormal uterus three years back during the time of second delivery by operation. At the time of discharge, the physician told me to took family planning and have an ANC follow-up when I am pregnant. I delayed starting ANC follow up for this pregnancy because I feeling fine and the health facility is so distant from my village. However, I was headed to a medical institution when labor started, the second procedure had already been completed. I learned a valuable lesson from this, and moving forward, I'll follow your advice for the next.

Availability of data and materials

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its supporting information files.

Abbreviations

ANC:

Antenatal care

GA:

Gestational age

US:

Ultra sonography

References

  1. Adeyemi AS, Atanda OOA, Adekunle AD. Successful pregnancy in one horn of a bicornuate uterus. Ann Afr Med. 2013;12(4):252.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wolman I. Berek and Novak’s Gynecology 15th Edition. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2014;64:150–1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-014-0538-z.

  3. Udigwe G, Nwajiaku L. Live Trem Pregnancy in One Horn of a Bicornuate uterus. Niger J Med. 2011;20(4):486–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Troiano RN, McCarthy SM. Mullerian duct anomalies: imaging and clinical issues. Radiology. 2004;233(1):19–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pfeifer SM, Attaran M, Goldstein J, Lindheim SR, Petrozza JC, Rackow BW, Siegelman E, Troiano R, Winter T, Zuckerman A. ASRM müllerian anomalies classification 2021. Fertil Steril. 2021;116(5):1238–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lin PC. Reproductive outcomes in women with uterine anomalies. J Womens Health. 2004;13(1):33–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sadek SM, Ahmad RA, Soliman BS. Three dimensional color Doppler transvaginal ultrasound morphologic features of uterine septum and residual cavity in women with reproductive failure. Middle East Fertility Society Journal. 2015;20(1):21–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Strassmann EO. Fertility and unification of double uterus. Fertil Steril. 1966;17(2):165–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Grimbizis GF, Camus M, Tarlatzis BC, Bontis JN, Devroey P. Clinical implications of uterine malformations and hysteroscopic treatment results. Hum Reprod Update. 2001;7(2):161–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ashelby L, Toll G, Patel RR, Abdel-Fattah S, Hunter A. Live birth after rupture of a non-communicating horn of a bicornuate uterus. BJOG (Oxford Print). 2005;112(11):1576–7.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Vaz SA, Dotters-Katz SK, Kuller JA. Diagnosis and management of congenital uterine anomalies in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2017;72(3):194–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Whitehouse B. Rupture of Pregnant Rudimentary Horn of Bicornute Uterus. Proc R Soc Med. 1912;5(Obstet_Gynaecol):121–4.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Hua M, Odibo A, Longman R, Roehl KA, Macones G, Cahill A. 864: Congenital uterine anomalies and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204(1):S334–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Puri M, Jain S, Goyal U. Spontaneous rupture of pregnancy in a hemicorpus of complete bicornuate uterus. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2000;40(3):350–1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mastrolia SA, Baumfeld Y, Hershkovitz R, Loverro G, Di Naro E, Yohai D, Schwarzman P, Weintraub AY. Bicornuate uterus is an independent risk factor for cervical os insufficiency: A retrospective population based cohort study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;30(22):2705–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Shuiqing M, Xuming B, Jinghe L. Pregnancy and its outcome in women with malformed uterus. Chin Med Sci J. 2002;17(4):242–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Maneschi F, Marana R, Muzii L, Mancuso S. Reproductive performance in women with bicornuate uterus. Acta Eur Fertil. 1993;24(3):117–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Proctor JA, Haney AF. Recurrent first trimester pregnancy loss is associated with uterine septum but not with bicornuate uterus. Fertil Steril. 2003;80(5):1212–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ludmir J, Samuels P, Brooks S, Mennuti MT. Pregnancy outcome of patients with uncorrected uterine anomalies managed in a high-risk obstetric setting. Obstet Gynecol. 1990;75(6):906–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ekwempu CC, Ogbe EA. Persistent breech presentation in a bicornuate uterus: A case Report. J Med Tropics. 2011;13(2):145–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Crabtree G, Machin G, Martin J, Nicholson S, Nimrod C. Fetal deformation caused by uterine malformation. Pediatr Pathol. 1984;2(3):305–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Faivre E, Fernandez H, Deffieux X, Gervaise A, Frydman R, Levaillant JM. Accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasonography in differential diagnosis of septate and bicornuate uterus compared with office hysteroscopy and pelvic magnetic resonance imaging. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2012;19(1):101–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ata B, Nayot D, Nedelchev A, Reinhold C, Tulandi T. Do measurements of uterine septum using three-dimensional ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging agree? J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014;36(4):331–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Reuter KL, Daly DC, Cohen SM. Septate versus bicornuate uteri: errors in imaging diagnosis. Radiology. 1989;172(3):749–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the patient who gave us written consent to write this story. We would like to express our gratitude to all of the staff of the maternity wing at Enat General Hospital, who participated in the management of the patient.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

T.M participated in the collection of information, management of the patient, and drafting and revising of the article. T.L, M.S, M.S, and B.T participated in drafting, revising the case report, and approval of the final draft for publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tebabere Moltot.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Informed written consent from participation taken from the patient and an Ethical review was taken from Debre Berhan University IRB.

Consent for publication

Informed written consent to publish was obtained from the patient.

Competing interests

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moltot, T., Lemma, T., Silesh, M. et al. Successful post-term pregnancy in scared bicornuate uterus: case report. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 23, 559 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05875-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05875-0

Keywords