Skip to main content
Download PDF

Socioeconomic and geographical inequalities in using skilled birth attendants during delivery in Bangladesh over two decades

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth volume 23, Article number: 430 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Maternal and neonatal mortality is a major public health concern globally. Evidence supports that skilled birth attendants (SBA) can significantly reduce maternal and neonatal mortality. Despite the improvement in SBA use, Bangladesh lacks evidence of equality in SBA use across socioeconomic and geographic regions. Therefore, we aim to estimate the trends and magnitude of inequality in SBA use in Bangladesh over the last two decades.

Methods

Data from the last 5 rounds of Bangladesh Demographic and Health Surveys (BDHS; 2017-18, 2014, 2011, 2007, and 2004) were used to measure the inequalities in the SBA use utilizing the WHO’s Health Equity Assessment Toolkit (HEAT) software. Inequality was assessed by four summary measures, namely, Population Attributable Risk (PAR), Population Attributable Fraction (PAF), Difference (D), and Ratio (R) based on the four equity dimensions: wealth status, education level, place of residence, and subnational regions (divisions). Point estimates and a 95% confidence interval (CI) were reported for each measure.

Results

An increasing trend in the overall prevalence of SBA use was observed (From 15.6% in 2004 to 52.9% in 2017). We found significant inequalities in SBA use in every wave of BDHS (from 2004 to 2017), with the result concentrating on the rich (in 2017, PAF: 57.1; 95% CI: 52.5–61.7), educated (in 2017, PAR: 9.9; 95% CI: 5.2–14.5),  and people from urban areas (in 2017, PAF: 28.0; 95% CI: 26.4–29.5). We also identified geographic disparities in SBA use favoring Khulna and Dhaka divisions (in 2017, PAR: 10.2; 95% CI: 5.7–14.7). Our study also observed inequality in using SBA among Bangladeshi women decreased over time.

Conclusion

To increase SBA use and to decrease inequality in all four equity dimensions, disadvantaged sub-groups should be prioritized in policies and planning for program implementation.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Maternal and child mortality has been a public health concern for many years. The reduction of maternal and child mortality is considered one of the main indicators to be achieved under goal 3 of the sustainable development goals (SDGs). Despite significant improvement, globally, the maternal mortality ratio (MMR) is still 223 deaths per 100,000 live births which is unacceptably high and far from the fulfillment of the SDGs target of 70 deaths per 100,000 live births [1]. The MMR is the highest in low- and middle-income countries and accounts for about 95% of maternal deaths worldwide. In comparison, South Asia alone contributed about 16% of global maternal death in 2020 [2]. Most causes associated with maternal mortality are preventable if care is provided by skilled professionals trained to address complications and manage them properly [3].

The World Health Organization (WHO), jointly with International Confederation of Midwives (ICM) and International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO), clearly states that a skilled birth attendant is a health professional who is accredited, educated, and trained to develop a set of skills to manage uncomplicated pregnancy and childbirth and identify complicated pregnancies, manage if possible, and when required refer mother and the newborn to appropriate care facilities [4]. Skilled birth attendance is critical for maternal and child health improvement [4, 5]. Studies have shown that skilled birth attendance is associated with a reduction in maternal mortality [6]. Following the evidence, SBA coverage has increased significantly globally, with around 80% of the birth coverage [7].

According to Save the Children and UNFPA, attendance of childbirth by a supported and trained skilled birth attendant can reduce 43% of the neonatal mortality [8] and two-thirds of the maternal mortality [9] which in numbers will add up to 3.6 million lives saved at the end of the year by doubling the number of SBA according to another report by UNFPA in 2011 [10]. Despite glowing evidence and enormous success in reducing maternal mortality through the supervision of skilled birth attendance, low and middle-income countries like Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia have a much lower prevalence of SBA attendance compared to European countries [11,12,13]. Although over the years, the prevalence of SBA has improved globally [14], different studies conducted in Ethiopia [15], Niger [16], Mali [16], and Sierra Leone [16] identified huge socioeconomic and geographical variations in the prevalence of SBA utilization. For example, studies conducted in Bangladesh [17, 18], Ghana [19, 20], and Ethiopia [21, 22] reported higher use of SBA among the people in the higher economic quintile, those attaining higher education, and women with a friend using SBA compared to the women who are at odds. The overall increase in the prevalence of SBA use may not be enough to reduce maternal mortality uniformly unless the inequality in SBA use is addressed.

In the last 10 years, Bangladesh has notablyy increased the prevalence of SBA deliveries. From 21% to 2007, the prevalence of SBA deliveries increased to 53%, according to the latest Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey (BDHS) 2017-18 [23]. This increased prevalence is still lower than the target by Bangladesh’s fourth Health Population and Nutrition Sector Development Program, which aimed to achieve the SBA use of 65% by 2022 [23]. Unavailability of the SBA due to the dysfunctionality of the health system in SBA distribution, urban preference tendency among the SBAs, and cultural beliefs of male or senior family members making the health decision for women in Bangladesh might influence the SBA use during delivery and contribute to SBA-related inequality. Previous research using 2014 BDHS data identified significant geographical disparity in the use of SBA among women of the Khulna and Sylhet divisions compared to the other administrative divisions [24]. In addition, a significant rural-urban variation in the prevalence of SBA was also evident from a previous Bangladeshi study [23]. Considering the findings of previous literature from Bangladesh and other developing countries, we hypothesized that there might be socioeconomic and geographical disparities in SBA use during delivery among Bangladeshi women.

Different factors have been found to be associated with utilizing the SBA during delivery. Factors like education, wealth quintile, place of residence, and sub-national region were commonly found to be significantly associated with SBA use, which is evidenced by the previous literature from Bangladesh [17, 18, 23], Nepal [25], Tanzania [26], and Ethiopia [27]. Several other factors likethe number of ANC visits during pregnancy [26, 27], the distance of the health facility from the place of residence [25], were also reported to be associated with the utilization of SBA. Moreover, knowledge about the danger signs of pregnancy [25], number of children [26], media exposure [27], and birth order [23, 27] were also found to be reported as the associated factor of SBA use during delivery in different occasions.

Though several studies [17, 18] have been conducted with the aim to determine the factors influencing the use of SBA during childbirth at a certain point in time, to our knowledge, no studies have been conducted that pointed out the inequality of SBA use in Bangladesh over time determining the trend and magnitude of inequality. Hence, this study aims to estimate the trends and magnitude of socioeconomic and geographical inequalities of SBA use in Bangladesh through different equity dimensions over two decades using data from five previous BDHS. The finding from this study will help the policymakers to address the inequality in different dimensions of SBA use and motivate the researcher to conduct further research.

Methods

Study design and sampling

Five rounds of BDHS data from 2004, followed by 2007, 2011, 2014, and 2017-18 were analyzed to measure the inequality of SBA use. BDHS is a nationally representative cross-sectional survey which is conducted by the National Institute of Population Research and Training (NIPORT) and the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare of Bangladesh in partnership with USAID as a part of the MEASURE program of DHS conducted in low and middle-income countries and all their data are stored in the WHO’s Health Equity Assessment Toolkit (HEAT). BDHS uses two-stage stratified sampling technique to collect data, where enumeration areas (EAs) were selected across the nation in the first stage, which were also considered the primary sampling units (PSUs). In the second stage, households were selected from each PSU. The detailed methodology, including the survey’s sampling techniques, is described in the final report of the latest BDHS [23].

Outcome variable

The use of SBA by Bangladeshi women was the primary outcome variable of this study. SBA was defined as when the births were assisted by the skilled personnel who, according to the BDHS, are the qualified doctors, nurses, midwives, or paramedics; family welfare visitors (FWVs); community skilled birth attendants (CSBAs); and sub-assistant community medical officers (SACMOs) [23]. We considered the SBA use among Bangladeshi women in the two or three years preceding the surveys [23]. Women were considered to use SBA if their delivery was attended to or assisted by skilled health personnel [4]. The response for the outcome variable was dichotomous (coded as 1 for SBA use and 0 for unskilled attendant) [28].

Equity dimensions

The inequality for the use of SBA was measured based on 4 equity dimensions. The dimensions were economic status, education, place of residence, and sub-national region. The economic status (household wealth quintiles) was constructed using the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) based on the household income, assets, and characteristics that were then ranked into poorest, poorer, middle, richer, and richest sub-groups [29]. Women’s level of education was categorized as no education, primary, and secondary/higher. The place of residence of the respondents was classified as urban and rural, and administrative divisions of Bangladesh were considered as the sub-national regions for measuring inequality.

Statistical analysis

For analyzing the inequality of the SBA use, we used the Health Equity Assessment Toolkit software (version 4.0) by WHO [30]. Data analysis using this software was carried out in two steps. In the first stage, data were disaggregated by the four equity dimensions (economic status, education of women, place of residence, and sub-national region) to estimate and distribute the prevalence of SBA use across the dimensions. The inequality was measured in the second stage, where both absolute and relative summary measures were calculated. We calculated Difference (D) and Population Attributable Risk (PAR) for the absolute measure. Population Attributable Fraction (PAF), and Ratio (R) were estimated as relative measures. Evidence showed that absolute and relative measures are important to be reported in a single study measuring health inequality [30, 31]. These 4 measures were calculated for each equity dimension in which D and R were considered simple measures,simple measures, and the PAF and PAR were complex measures (weighted measurement). In the case of the binary or non-ordered dimensions like the place of residence or geographical regions, the simple measure D is calculated simply by subtracting the lowest estimate (rural) from the highest estimate (urban), and R is the quotient obtained by dividing the group with the highest prevalence (Khulna) by the group with lowest prevalence (Sylhet). On the other hand, for the ordered dimension like wealth quintile and education level, D is the result of the subtraction between the most advantageous (richest) and most disadvantageous group (poorest), and R is the ratio between the advantageous (secondary or higher education) and disadvantageous group (no education) [32]. To measure the complex measures like PAR and PAF, the national average was considered as the population average. PAR is calculated as the difference between the group with the highest estimate (Yhighest) and the national average (\(\mu )\) irrespective of the indicator type i.e., PAR = Yhighest – \(\mu\). The PAF is product of the result obtained by dividing the PAR by the national average and 100 i.e., PAF = (PAR/\(\mu\)) × 100 [28, 33]. The detailed procedure and calculation of the summary measures are described elaborately elsewhere [30, 31].

The PAF and PAR values can be positive or negative in the calculation where the positive value is assumed to favor the health intervention, and the negative value indicates the adverse outcome [34]. Therefore, the higher value of PAF and PAR will indicate higher inequality regardless of the direction, and the inequality will be absent if the PAF and PAR values are 0. In contrast, inequality will be absent in the case of simple measures if the values of D and R, respectively become 0 and 1. We have calculated the point estimate of the measures and presented the result with a 95% confidence interval (CI). With all inequality measures, a confidence interval (CI) that did not include 0 was regarded as statistically significant; except for R, where the CI should not contain 1 to be considered statistically significant [34].

Results

Distribution of SBA use in different equity dimensions

The trend of SBA use among Bangladeshi women of different socioeconomic status is shown in Table 1 over the time from 2004 to 2017. An increased prevalence in SBA use was observed among all sub-groups, while women from richest quintile was found to be highest in SBA use in 2004 (45.8%), which raised to 83.1% in 2017. Similarly, an increasing pattern of SBA use is also found among women with higher education. For instance, in 2017, women who had secondary/higher education utilized SBA (62.7%) higher than the women who had no formal education (29.0%).

Table 1 Trends in the prevalence of skilled birth attendant, disintegrated across four inequality dimensions, from years 2004 to 2017
Full size table

An uplifting trend for the overall prevalence of SBA was also found, where the prevalence of SBA was 15.6% in 2004, increased to 31.7% in 2011, and 52.9% in 2017. Furthermore, women from urban areas (67.7%) and belonging to the sub-national region of Khulna (63.1%) and Dhaka (60.5%) had the highest prevalence of SBA in 2017. The result also shows that Sylhet was found to have the lowest prevalence (12.7%) in 2004 and still lagged behind having the lowest prevalence of SBA among other sub-national regions in 2017 (40.4%) (Table 1).

Magnitude of the inequalities in the SBA use

Both socioeconomic and geographical inequalities in the prevalence of SBA use were found based on all summary measures. Wealth-driven disparities were obtained by simple (D, R) and complex measures (PAF, PAR) with a higher concentration among the poorest sub-group than the Richest. For instance, the PAF measure 57.1 (95% CI: 52.5–61.7) in 2017 shows significant inequalities favoring those from the highest wealth quintile. Education-related inequality was found in all survey waves disfavoring the women with no education than those with secondary/higher education. For example, the absolute measure PAR (9.9; 95% CI: 5.2–14.5) and relative measure PAF (18.6; 95% CI: 9.8–27.4) in 2017 indicated significant inequalities with higher burden among women without formal education (Table 2).

Table 2 Inequality indices estimates of the factors associated with prevalence of women attended by a skilled birth attendant, years 2004–2017
Full size table

We also found significant absolute and relative inequalities in the geographical (non-ordinal) dimensions like the place of residence and subnational region from 2004 to 2017. A rural-urban disparity was obtained over time, with women from the rural areas being the disfavored sub-group. For instance, PAF and PAR measures of 28 (95% CI: 26.4–29.5) and 14.8 (95% CI: 14-15.6) in 2017, respectively, describe significant pro-rich inequalities. Similarly, with a higher concentration of SBA use in the Khulna and Dhaka division, the regional inequalities were declining in the past two decades, disfavoring the Sylhet division. The significant regional inequalities were evident from the PAF of 19.3 (95% CI: 10.8–27.8) as the relative measure and D of 22.7 (95% CI: 13.9–31.4) as the absolute measure in 2017 (Table 2).

Discussion

In this study, we have investigated the trend and inequalities in the prevalence of SBA use in Bangladesh over the last two decades, from 2004 to 2017, using the nationally representative BDHS data. It was observed that the use of SBA has increased from 15.6% to 2004 to 52.9% in 2017. This increasing pattern of SBA use among women is in line with the study conducted in Guinea [28], Ethiopia [15], and Ghana [35]. This finding could be due to the increased access to the number of health facilities during these two decades [36]. Another reason behind this study finding could be the increased number of skilled birth attendants due to the government initiatives in 2003. The initiative was to provide 2 trained community skilled birth attendants in each union, which resulted in increased SBA access over time [37]. Besides different non-government organizations like BRAC is also working on the capacity building of SBA in Bangladesh [38].

This study revealed that the prevalence of utilizing SBA was higher among the women from households with highest economic status than the women from lowest economic sub-group. This pattern was consistent over time and coincided with several previous studies [35, 39]. The prevalence of SBA use was also concentrated in the rich quintile in studies conducted in Bangladesh [17, 40]. Despite the increase in the prevalence in the SBA use among the women from all wealth quintiles over time, persistent inequality remains. This could be due to the much higher increase in SBA use among the women in the richest quintile compared to a slow rise in the poorest quintile. Besides, the cost of SBA use, which is certainly higher for the women from poorest quintile to manage [17]. And the SBA’s mostly prefer to attend the households that would pay them well [41]. Another reason might be that wealthier women tend to make their own decision regarding the health care, especially when it comes to the baby’s health [42].

Women with secondary or higher education were found to have higher prevalence of SBA use than those without formal education. This finding corroborates with the studies on the inequality in SBA use conducted in Guinea [28], Ghana [35], and Ethiopia [15]. Similar results were observed in the studies that looked at the factors determining the SBA use in Ghana [43], and Bangladesh [17, 18]. This result can be explained by the increase in awareness about health problems among educated women compared to non-educated women [44]. Educated women are also found to be more empowered and confident in taking their own healthcare decisions than those with no education [45, 46]. This could also affect their choice of SBA use during delivery. Besides, educated women are more aware of the availability and accessibility of healthcare services in their surroundings [44]. On the other hand, higher education is also associated with the wealth status. Since higher educated women are more likely to have better job they are found to be financially independent [17] and more likely to make choices like whether to use SBA during delivery. However, further qualitative exploration is warranted to know the in-depth scenario of why SBA utilization are lower among women with low socioeconomic status in Bangladesh.

Urban-rural disparities in the use of skilled birth attendants was observed in this study. SBA use was found to be higher among urban women than rural women, which is in line with the findings of previous studies done in Guinea [28], Bangladesh [17], India [47], and Ethiopia [48]. Lack of quality service in rural areas could be one of the factors behind the rural-urban disparities in the SBA use. This finding could also be explained by the lack of awareness among rural women compared to urban women, which is also associated with lower educational level and socioeconomic status [24, 41]. Another reason behind the less utilization of SBA may be the greater distance of health facilities from rural households [49]. The urban preference tendency (i.e., skilled professionals are more likely to work in the urban site due to better facility and financial benefits than the rural areas) of the SBAs and social norms in the rural community could be another plausible reason in the disparities in the SBA use among the women of urban and rural residence.

Regional inequality in the prevalence of SBA use was significant with the highest prevalence of SBA use in Khulna division, and the lowest in Sylhet division. results were found in studies conducted previously in Bangladesh using the BDHS data [17, 50]. Khulna was found to have a greater prevalence of women in the higher wealth quintile, attaining higher education, and more antenatal care visits than Sylhet [50]. These could be the reasons for the difference in the use of SBA, since all of these factors are associated with more SBA use [51, 52]. Again, the lack of awareness among the women in Sylhet, very little knowledge about the danger signs of pregnancy and child birth, and religious superstitions among many families were reported to be the reasons behind the low prevalence of SBA use in Sylhet and the lack of access to health care. Besides, not choosing skilled birth attendants for delivery was found to save them both money and travel from home, leading to a lower prevalence than in any other subnational region in Bangladesh [53].

Strengths and limitations

In this study, the inequality measures were calculated by WHO HEAT software which increases the quality of the study due to the use of both absolute and relative summary measures. As we have used data from nationally representative surveys, the result of our study could be generalizable across the populations. We have also used simple and complex (weight was considered) measures that upheld the appropriateness of measuring the magnitude of inequalities. This study will be helpful for policymakers to innovate new program ideas to narrow down the inequalities in SBA use in both socioeconomic and geographical dimensions.

There are a few limitations in this study as well. Since we used the data from cross sectional studies, we could not show any causal effect for the inequality of SBA use among the women in different dimensions. Also, due to the choice of analytic strategy, we could not consider other dimensions of inequality, limiting us to measuring inequalities in different social, demographic, and cultural domains.

Conclusion

From the results of this study, we conclude that, despite the increasing trend in the prevalence of SBA use and narrowing of the inequalities in the last two decades, there is significantly persistent inequalities exist between the advantaged group being the rich, educated, and urban resident and the disadvantaged group being the poor, non-educated and rural women. Besides, regional disparities were also observed, with a significant gap in prevalence of SBA use between the Khulna and Sylhet divisions. To curve the inequality in the SBA use among Bangladeshi women, dimension-based intervention designing is necessary by focusing on the disadvantaged sub-groups. Therefore, the government and policymakers should consider the planning and implementation of programs explicitly addressing the disadvantaged group to minimize inequality. Future studies may consider qualitative and prospective research to find the contextual differences and the causes of inequality in multiple dimensions.

Data Availability

The study used data from the 2017–2018 Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey. The data set is available at: https://dhsprogram.com/data/available-datasets.cfm.

Abbreviations

SBA:

Skilled Birth Attendant

HEAT:

Health Equity Assessment Toolkit

BDHS:

Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey

SDG:

Sustainable Development Goals

MMR:

Maternal Mortality Ratio

WHO:

World Health Organization

ICM:

International Confederation of Midwives

FIGO:

International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics

EA:

Enumeration Area

PSU:

Primary Sampling Unit

CI:

Confidence Interval

PAF:

Population Attributable Fraction

PAR:

Population Attributable Risk

PCA:

Principal Component Analysis

BRAC:

Bangladesh Rural Advancement Committee

References

  1. United Nation. Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages. https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal3. Accessed 22 Mar 2023.

  2. World Health Organization. Maternal mortality. 2023. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/maternal-mortality. Accessed 22 Mar 2023.

  3. Gabrysch S, Campbell OMR. Still too far to walk: literature review of the determinants of delivery service use. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009;9:34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. World Health Organization IC of M&. F internationale de G et d’Obstétrique. Making pregnancy safer: the critical role of the skilled attendant: a joint statement by WHO, ICM and FIGO. World Health Organization; 2004.

  5. World Health Organization. Reduction of maternal mortality: a joint WHO/UNFPA/UNICEF/World Bank statement. 1999.

  6. Loudon I. Death in childbirth: an international study of maternal care and maternal mortality 1800–1950. 1992.

  7. UNICEF. Delivery care. 2022. https://data.unicef.org/topic/maternal-health/delivery-care/#more1596. Accessed 22 Mar 2023.

  8. Wright S. Ending newborn deaths: ensuring every baby survives. Save the Children; 2014.

  9. UNFPA. Delivering hope and saving lives – investing in midwifery. 2012.

  10. Carr C, Fauveau V, Fogstad H, Garden B, Johnson P, Laski L, et al. The state of the World’s midwifery. Int J Childbirth. 2011;1:214–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Barros AJ, Ronsmans C, Axelson H, Loaiza E, Bertoldi AD, Frana GV, et al. Equity in maternal, newborn, and child health interventions in countdown to 2015: a retrospective review of survey data from 54 countries. Lancet. 2012;379:1225–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. World Health Organization and., International Center for Equity in Health. State of Inequality; Reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health. 2015.

  13. UNFPA. Giving Birth Should Not Be a Matter of life and death. 2012.

  14. World Health Organization. Defining competent maternal and newborn health professionals. 2018.

  15. Tarekegn W, Tsegaye S, Berhane Y. Skilled birth attendant utilization trends, determinant and inequality gaps in Ethiopia. BMC Womens Health. 2022;22:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ameyaw EK, Dickson KS. Skilled birth attendance in Sierra Leone, Niger, and Mali: analysis of demographic and health surveys. BMC Public Health. 2020;20:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kibria GM, Al, Ghosh S, Hossen S, Barsha RAA, Sharmeen A, Uddin SMI. Factors affecting deliveries attended by skilled birth attendants in Bangladesh. Matern Heal Neonatol Perinatol. 2017;3:1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nahar MT, Ibn Anik SMF, Islam MA, Islam SMS. Individual and community-level factors associated with skilled birth attendants during delivery in Bangladesh: a multilevel analysis of demographic and health surveys. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(6 June):1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ganle JK, Kombet ML, Baatiema L. Factors influencing the use of supervised delivery services in Garu-Tempane District, Ghana. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19:1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Saaka M, Akuamoah-Boateng J. Prevalence and Determinants of Rural-Urban Utilization of Skilled Delivery Services in Northern Ghana. Scientifica (Cairo). 2020;2020.

  21. Mezmur M, Navaneetham K, Letamo G, Bariagaber H. Individual, household and contextual factors associated with skilled delivery care in Ethiopia: Evidence from Ethiopian demographic and health surveys. 2017 Sep 14;12(9):. PLoS One. 2017;14:e0184688–e0184688.

  22. Tesfaye G, Chojenta C, Smith R, Loxton D. Predisposing, enabling and need factors associated with skilled delivery care utilization among reproductive-aged women in Kersa district, eastern Ethiopia. Reprod Health. 2019;16:1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. National Institute of Population Research and Training (NIPORT); ICF International; Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2017-18. Dhaka, Bangladesh, Rockville, Maryland, USA NIPORT ICF. 2020;:1–511.

  24. National Institute of Population Research and Training Mitra and Associates M of H and FW, Dhaka B. Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2014. Bangladesh: Dhaka; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Choulagai B, Onta S, Subedi N, Mehata S, Bhandari GP, Poudyal A, et al. Barriers to using skilled birth attendants’ services in mid-and far-western Nepal: a cross-sectional study. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2013;13:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Damian DJ, Tibelerwa JY, John B, Philemon R, Mahande MJ, Msuya SE. Factors influencing utilization of skilled birth attendant during childbirth in the Southern highlands, Tanzania: a multilevel analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20:1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tolossa T, Bekele D. Multilevel analysis of skilled birth attendance and associated factors among reproductive age women in Ethiopia: data from EDHS 2016. Int J Africa Nurs Sci. 2020;13:100268.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zegeye B, Ahinkorah BO, Ameyaw EK, Budu E, Seidu AA, Olorunsaiye CZ, et al. Disparities in use of skilled birth attendants and neonatal mortality rate in Guinea over two decades. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022;22:1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Rutstein SO, Johnson K. The DHS Wealth Index (DHS comparative reports No. 6); ORC Macro: Calverton, Md, 2004. Google Sch There is no Corresp Rec this Ref.

  30. Hosseinpoor AR, Nambiar D, Schlotheuber A, Reidpath D, Ross Z. Health Equity Assessment Toolkit (HEAT): software for exploring and comparing health inequalities in countries. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016;16:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. World Health Organization (WHO). Handbook on health inequality monitoring: with a special focus on low-and middle-income countries. Geneva: World Health Organization. World Health Organization; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ahinkorah BO, Budu E, Duah HO, Okyere J, Seidu A-A. Socioeconomic and geographical inequalities in adolescent fertility rate in Ghana, 1993–2014. Arch Public Heal. 2021;79:1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Budu E, Ahinkorah BO, Okyere J, Seidu A-A, Duah HO. Inequalities in the prevalence of full immunization coverage among one-year-olds in Ghana, 1993–2014. Vaccine. 2022;40:3614–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Schlotheuber A, Hosseinpoor AR. Summary measures of health inequality: a review of existing measures and their application. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19:3697.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Tetteh JK, Ameyaw EK, Adu C, Agbaglo E, Agbadi P, Nutor JJ. Inequalities in the prevalence of skilled birth attendance in Ghana between 1993 and 2014. Int Health 2022; November 2022:224–32.

  36. Yakob B, Gage A, Nigatu TG, Hurlburt S, Hagos S, Dinsa G, et al. Low effective coverage of family planning and antenatal care services in Ethiopia. Int J Qual Heal Care. 2019;31:725–32.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Hossain J, Laterra A, Paul RR, Islam A, Ahmmed F, Sarker BK. Filling the human resource gap through public-private partnership: can private, community-based skilled birth attendants improve maternal health service utilization and health outcomes in a remote region of Bangladesh? PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0226923.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Chowdhury AMR, Mahbub A, Chowdhury AS, Kamal FE, Ahmed SM. Skilled attendance at delivery in Bangladesh: a strategy development tool. 2002.

  39. Ameyaw EK, Tanle A, Kissah-Korsah K, Amo-Adjei J. Women’s Health decision-making autonomy and Skilled Birth Attendance in Ghana. Int J Reprod Med. 2016;2016:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Zere E, Suehiro Y, Arifeen A, Moonesinghe L, Chanda SK, Kirigia JM. Equity in reproductive and maternal health services in Bangladesh. Int J Equity Health. 2013;12:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Afroja S, Muhammad Nasim AS, Khan MS, Kabir MA. Rural-Urban Determinants of Receiving Skilled Birth Attendants among Women in Bangladesh: Evidence from National Survey 2017-18. Int J Clin Pract. 2022;2022.

  42. Osamor PE, Grady C. Women’s autonomy in health care decision-making in developing countries: a synthesis of the literature. Int J Womens Health. 2016;8:191–202.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Budu E. Predictors of home births among rural women in Ghana: analysis of data from the 2014 Ghana demographic and Health Survey. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Onasoga OA, Afolayan JA, Oladimeij BD. Factor’s influencing utilization of antenatal care services among pregnant women in Ife Central LGA, Osun State Nigeria. Adv Appl Sci Res. 2012;3:1309–15.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Pratley P. Associations between quantitative measures of women’s empowerment and access to care and health status for mothers and their children: a systematic review of evidence from the developing world. Soc Sci Med. 2016;169:119–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Jejeebhoy SJ. Women’s education, autonomy, and reproductive behaviour: experience from developing countries. OUP Cat. 1995.

  47. Nair M, Ariana P, Webster P. What influences the decision to undergo institutional delivery by skilled birth attendants? A cohort study in rural Andhra Pradesh, India. Rural Remote Health. 2012;12:1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Fekadu M, Regassa N. Skilled delivery care service utilization in Ethiopia: analysis of rural-urban differentials based on national demographic and health survey (DHS) data. Afr Health Sci. 2014;14:974–84.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Tesfaw N, Gizachew A, Kassa GM, Abajobir AA. Skilled delivery service utilization and associated factors among mothers who gave birth in the last two years in Northwest Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2018;28.

  50. Kibria GM, Al, Burrowes V, Choudhury A, Sharmeen A, Ghosh S, Kalbarczyk A. A comparison of practices, distributions and determinants of birth attendance in two divisions with highest and lowest skilled delivery attendance in Bangladesh. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Saad–Haddad G, DeJong J, Terreri N, Restrepo–Méndez MC, Perin J, Vaz L et al. Patterns and determinants of antenatal care utilization: analysis of national survey data in seven countdown countries. J Glob Health. 2016;6.

  52. Rahman A, Nisha MK, Begum T, Ahmed S, Alam N, Anwar I. Trends, determinants and inequities of 4 + ANC utilisation in Bangladesh. J Heal Popul Nutr. 2017;36:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  53. icddrb. Understanding barriers to maternal health in remote communities in Bangladesh. https://www.icddrb.org/news-and-events/news?id=708&task=view. Accessed 26 Mar 2023.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors of the present study greatly acknowledge the Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) for providing access to freely use their database.

Funding

None.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Syed Sharaf Ahmed Chowdhury and Satyajit Kundu contributed equally to this manuscript.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Public Health, North South University, Dhaka, 1229, Bangladesh

    Syed Sharaf Ahmed Chowdhury & Azaz Bin Sharif

  2. Global Health Institute, North South University, Dhaka, 1229, Bangladesh

    Satyajit Kundu & Azaz Bin Sharif

  3. Faculty of Nutrition and Food Science, Patuakhali Science and Technology University, Patuakhali, 8602, Bangladesh

    Satyajit Kundu

Authors
  1. Syed Sharaf Ahmed Chowdhury
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Satyajit Kundu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Azaz Bin Sharif
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SK and ABS accept full responsibility for the work and/or the conduct of the study, had access to the data, and controlled the decision to publish. SK and ABS also takes responsibility for the integrity and accuracy of the data analysis. SK performed the statistical analysis. SSAC and SK produced the first draft of the manuscript. SK and ABS reviewed and undertook the scientific editing of the manuscript both for statistical correctness and language appropriateness. All authors read and approved the final version for publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Satyajit Kundu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study used deidentified data from the Demographic Health Survey program, which has already received ethical approval from the participating countries, no further ethical permission was sought to carry out this research. Data was collected from online source (https://dhsprogram.com) with appropriate request. Written informed consent from the respondents enrolled in the survey and other ethical review documents are available at: https://dhsprogram.com/methodology/Protecting-the-Privacy-of-DHS-Survey-Respondents.cfm. The data set is available online publicly for all researchers, hence there is no need to approve.

Consent for publications

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chowdhury, S.S.A., Kundu, S. & Sharif, A.B. Socioeconomic and geographical inequalities in using skilled birth attendants during delivery in Bangladesh over two decades. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 23, 430 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05754-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05754-8

Keywords

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

ISSN: 1471-2393

Contact us