Skip to main content
Download PDF

Determinants of health facility delivery among young mothers aged 15 – 24 years in Nigeria: a multilevel analysis of the 2018 Nigeria demographic and health survey

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth volume 23, Article number: 185 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Young mothers aged 15 to 24 years are particularly at higher risk of adverse health outcomes during childbirth. Delivery in health facilities by skilled birth attendants can help reduce this risk and lower maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. This study assessed the determinants of health facility delivery among young Nigerian women.

Methods

A nationally representative population data extracted from the 2018 Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey of 5,399 young women aged 15–24 years who had had their last birth in the five years before the survey was analysed. Data was described using frequencies and proportions. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were carried out using Chi-Square test and multilevel mixed effect binary logistic regression. All the analysis were carried out using STATA software, version 16.0 SE (Stata Corporation, TX, USA)..

Results

Of the total sampled women in the 2018 NDHS, 5,399 (12.91%) formed our study population of young women 15 -24 years who had their last birth in the preceding five years of the survey. Only 33.72% of the young mothers utilized health facility for delivery. Women educated beyond the secondary school level had 4.4 times higher odds of delivering at a health facility compared with women with no education (AOR 4.42 95%, CI 1.83 – 10.68). Having fewer children and attending more antenatal visits increased the odds of health facility delivery. With increasing household wealth index, women were more likely to deliver in a health facility. The odds of health facility delivery were higher among women whose partners had higher than secondary level of education. Women who lived in communities with higher levels of female education, skilled prenatal support, and higher levels of transportation support were more likely to deliver their babies in a health facility.

Conclusion

Strategies to promote institutional delivery among young mothers should include promoting girl child education, reducing financial barriers in access to healthcare, promoting antenatal care, and improving skilled birth attendants and transportation support in disadvantaged communities.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Globally, approximately 810 women die from complications of pregnancy or childbirth each day [1] For each woman who dies, approximately 20 others suffer serious infections, injuries or disabilities [2] Sub-Saharan Africa has the highest maternal mortality ratio of 533 maternal deaths per 100,000 live births, which corresponds to 200,000 maternal deaths a year [2] and nearly 20% of all global maternal deaths happen in Nigeria [3]. Nigeria’s estimated maternal mortality ratio is 512 maternal deaths per 100,000 live births according to NDHS 2018 [4] and the lifetime risk of dying during pregnancy, childbirth or postpartum/post-abortion for a Nigerian woman is 1 in 33 [4].

Maternal mortality is considered an individual tragedy and a human rights violation as most times, they are preventable [5]. The impact of maternal mortality and morbidity can be far reaching affecting families and communities. Maternal mortality can have adverse health and psychological effects for children, the spouse and other household members [6]. There is a link between maternal mortality/morbidity and increased risk of stillbirth and neonatal deaths [7, 8]. Surviving older children may suffer from disruptions in education and also living arrangements, leaving these children as victims to the cycle of poverty, who are thus at higher risks of repeating maternal and neonatal mortality [9,10,11]. Surviving children may also be more vulnerable to illnesses and malnutrition [11]. Spouses are often bereft, and ill-prepared to handle the role expansion required after losing a wife [12]. Economic losses and poverty often follows maternal death, as many times, additional income is lost, and there are economic costs to the family associated with illness and death [12]. Communities and even societal norms and behaviors may be affected by illness or death, especially if the sick or deceased woman is or was a prominent member of the community [6].

Maternal mortality shows elevated rates at extremes of maternal age [13]. Young mothers are particularly at higher risk of adverse health outcomes. Teenage pregnancies have major health consequences for the mothers and their babies and these include higher risks of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, gestational diabetes, anemia in pregnancy, delivery complications, puerperal endometritis and systemic infections [14, 15]. Babies born to adolescents also face higher risks of preterm delivery, low birth weight, birth trauma, respiratory diseases and severe neonatal conditions [14, 15]. Compared to older mothers, young mothers are at higher risks of having unplanned pregnancies and sexually transmitted infections (including HIV) and tend to have lower educational attainment, lower earnings, and poorer health [16,17,18]. These vulnerabilities can impact on delivery outcomes.

The process of childbirth can result in unexpected complications [19]. Three quarters of maternal deaths occur during delivery and in the immediate post-partum period [19]. Health facility delivery provides skilled health attendants to better manage the outcome of pregnancy and child birth and has a positive contribution in reducing maternal and newborn mortality and morbidity. The link between early and regular antenatal care attendance, delivery in health facility, and improved maternal health outcomes has been well documented for a considerable amount of time [20]. Women who deliver in health facilities have access to basic obstetric care, neonatal care, and emergency care, hence improved, maternal and neonatal health outcomes [19].

In Nigeria, efforts to improve health facility delivery led to the introduction of the Midwives Service Scheme and the Subsidy Reinvestment and Empowerment Programme (SURE-P) [21, 22]. The Nigerian government in 2009 set up the Midwives service scheme to improve availability of skilled birth attendants in rural areas in the country in a bid to increase health facility delivery and quality of healthcare [21]. The program engages newly graduated, unemployed and retired midwives to work temporarily in rural areas. In addition, the SURE-P was initiated in 2012 to re-invest fuel subsidy funds into social safety net programs which included improving maternal health. The SURE – P had a component of conditional cash transfer to women for attending four antenatal care visits, delivering in a health facility and attending postnatal visits [21, 22]. Other components of the SURE – P include health facility staffing and renovations, supply chain for essential maternal health commodities, and community mobilization through village health workers and leadership committees [22]. These programmes recorded some successes, however, in 2018, only about 33% of young women in Nigeria delivered at a health facility [23].

Identifying factors associated with health facility delivery among young women is pertinent to providing information for interventions and policies aimed at reducing maternal mortality. Current literature does not adequately address this gap. For instance, Ononokpono et. al, [24]. Adedokun et. al, [25] and Solanke et. al. [26] have identified determinants of place of delivery among Nigerian women aged 15–49 years without specific attention to young mothers who have the highest risk. This study however, will focus on young women as they form an important high risk group for maternal mortality and morbidity. Olakunde et. al. [27] and Rai et. al. [28] examined factors associated with skilled birth attendants at delivery among married adolescent girls in Nigeria, however the factors examined were limited to individual characteristics such as educational attainment, wealth quintile, pregnancy wantedness, parity and antenatal care (ANC) visit [27]. Community characteristics also influence place of delivery to a large extent and this information can inform strategies to reduce maternal mortality. Our study considers the hierarchical structure of the Nigerian Demographic and Health Survey (NDHS) data and thus employs a multilevel modeling to assesses both individual and community levels characteristics. Insight into the community attributes impacting health facility delivery is essential for programs, policies and strategies aimed at increasing health facility delivery among young mothers as efforts can be best directed at communities with the most need. This study assessed the factors associated with health facility delivery among young women aged 15 to 24 years in Nigeria using data from the most recent Demographic and Health Survey.

Methods

Data source

Women recode data extracted from the Nigerian Demographic and Health Survey 2018 was analysed. The 2018 NDHS is the sixth Demographic and Health Survey conducted in Nigeria since 1990 [29]. Data collection took place from 14 August 2018 to 29 December 2018 [4]. The survey was cross-sectional and provides estimates of demographic and health indicators [29].

Sampling methodology of the 2018 NDHS

The Population and Housing Census of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (NPHC), conducted in 2006 was the sampling frame used for the 2018 NDHS [29]. The primary sampling unit (PSU)/cluster for the 2018 NDHS is defined on the basis of enumeration areas (EAs) from the 2006 census. A nationally representative sample of respondents were interviewed in the 6 geographical zones, 36 states and the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) [29]. Stratified sampling in two stages was used to select respondents [4]. The 37 states were separated into urban and rural areas such that in total, there were 74 sampling strata. In the first stage, 1,400 EAs were selected with probability proportional to EA size. In the second stage, 30 households were selected in each cluster by an equal probability systematic sampling. A sample of 41,821 women aged 15–49 in 40,427 households participated in the survey. This study is however limited to 5,399 women aged 15 – 24 years who had recent live birth in the preceding five years of the survey.

Study variables

The dependent and independent variables examined in this study with their descriptions are presented in Table 1.

Table 1 Description of study variables
Full size table

Data analysis

Weighted data analysis was done using STATA software, version 16.0 SE (Stata Corporation, TX, USA). Three levels of analysis were carried out. First, descriptive analysis was done to determine the distribution of respondents in terms of individual characteristics and community levels characteristics. Second, bivariate analysis was done to determine the association between the given characteristics and place of delivery using Chi-square to test the statistical significance. Third, multilevel logistic regression analysis was used to account for the hierarchical nature of the DHS data. We estimated four models. The first model being an empty model, contained no covariates but decomposed the total variance into individual and community components. The second model included individual characteristics only. The third model included only the community level variables, while the fourth model included both the individual and community levels variables.

Odds ratios were used to present the results of fixed effect in addition with the confidence interval (95%). Intra cluster correlation (ICC) was used to explain the results of random effect. Model goodness of fit was checked using BIC, multi-collinearity was confirmed through application of Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) and the variable – marital status—was dropped from the regression analysis due to multi-collinearity. The mathematical statement of the multilevel mixed effect binary logistic regression model is as follows:

Empty Model (Model 0): The model expresses the similarity in the health facility delivery among young mothers across the communities.

$$Log\left[\frac{{\pi }_{ij}}{1-{\pi }_{ij}}\right]={\beta }_{0ijk}+{e}_{ij}$$

Other models that contain explanatory variables:

$$Log\left[\frac{{\pi }_{ij}}{1-{\pi }_{ij}}\right]={\beta }_{0}+{\beta }_{1}{X}_{1ij}+....{\beta }_{n}{X}_{nij}+{u}_{oj}+{e}_{ij}$$

Where:πij is the log of odds of delivery outside of health facility

(1-πij) is the log of odds of health facility deliveryβ0 is log odds of the interceptβ1, … βn are changes in level of health facility delivery due to individual and community-level factors

X1ij… Xnij are independent variables of individuals and communities

U0j are random errors at community levelseij is the error term or residuals

Ethical approval

Being a secondary data, we registered and obtained permission to download the requested datasets from the measure DHS website. The data were handled with confidentiality. The 2018 NDHS survey protocol was approved by the National Health Research Ethics Committee of Nigeria (NHREC) and the ICF Institutional Review Board. Written informed consents were obtained from all participants. All methods were performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Results

Of the 5,399 young mothers, only 33.72% (one third) of the young mothers aged 15–24 years utilized health facility for delivery. About half (49.29%) had their most recent childbirth between the ages of 12 and 19 while the remaining half gave birth in their early twenties (20 -24 years). Majority (91.02%) were currently married/living with spouse/partner. Most of the women had secondary education as their highest level of education (35.74%). Half of the respondents (51.85%) had at least four antenatal visits and 27.98% did not receive antenatal care. A higher proportion (45.62%) of the respondents fell into the poor household wealth index and 45.33% had no exposure to mass media. Majority of the respondents resided in rural communities (70.84%) (Table 2).

Table 2 Sample characteristics and prevalence of health facility delivery for mothers aged 15–24 years In Nigeria, 2018 NDHS
Full size table

The results of the bivariate analysis indicate that all the independent variables except ‘partner’s employment status’ and ‘ethnic diversity’ were significantly associated with health facility delivery. A higher proportion of those that were currently married/living with partner (48.67%) utilized health facility for delivery. Utilization of health facility delivery was highest for those who had post-secondary school education (80.76%) compared with women with secondary education (56.01%), primary education (34.25%) and no education (14.94%). Delivery in a health facility was highest for women who had only one childbirth (42.07%) compared with those with 2–3 childbirths (26.94%) and those with 4 -7 childbirths (23.13%). A higher proportion of women who had at least 4 antenatal visits (50.00%) utilised health facility for delivery, compared with those who had less than 4 visits (28.30%) and those who didn’t attend antenatal care (5.50%) (Table 3).

Table 3 Bivariate analysis of factors associated with health faciity delivery among young mothers aged 15–24 Years In Nigeria
Full size table

A higher proportion of young mothers residing in communities with low level of poverty (49.09%) had their most recent delivery in a health facility. Lower proportions of respondents who live in communities with low levels of education (14.98%) utilized health facility delivery. Respondents residing in communities with high level of transportation support had higher utilization of health facility for delivery (60.13%). Women who reside in rural areas (25.51%) had lower utilization of facility delivery than women residing in urban areas. Women residing in southeast Nigeria (76.56%), the had highest utilization of facility delivery while women residing in Northwest Nigeria (15.76%) had the lowest utilization of facility delivery (Table 3).

Table 4 shows the multivariate result. The parameters of the model such as the AIC and BIC confirmed that the models were well fitted The Log likelihood further reflected the statistical significance of random effects. As shown in the Table 4, when no independent factors were included in the analysis (empty model), the proportion of variation in the health facility delivery was 66.54% between communities. This therefore indicated significant variation in the health facility delivery among young mothers across the communities. This finding suggests that some communities deliver at health facility than others. Model 2 which contains only the individual level variables show that highest level of education, employment status, number of children born, number of antenatal visits, wealth index, exposure to mass media, partner’s level of education were significantly associated with health facility delivery. The results of ICC reflected reduction in the variation of health facility delivery among youngers to 49.56%. Model 3 contains only the community level variables and reveals that community level of poverty, community women’s education, community skilled prenatal support, and community transportation support were significantly associated with health facility delivery. The results of ICC indicated further reduction in the variation in health facility delivery to 47.18% when only community variables when fitted into the model. At model 4 however, exposure to mass media and community level of poverty were not predictors of health facility delivery. From the 4th model (model consisting of individual and community explanatory variables), women with higher than secondary level of education had 4.4 times higher odds of delivering at a health facility than women with no education. Women with secondary school education had 1.5 times higher odds of delivering in a health facility, compared to women with no education. The more the number of children born to a woman, the lower the odds of delivering in a health facility and the more antenatal visits a woman attends, the more likely she will deliver in a health facility. The respondents that fell into the middle (AOR 1.52; 95% CI 1.11—2.08) rich (AOR 1.67;95% CI 1.17—2.39) household wealth index were more likely to deliver in a health facility than those that fell into the poor household wealth index. The odds of health facility delivery were higher among women whose partners had higher than secondary education (AOR 1.69 95%; CI 1.08—2.64) compared to those whose partners had no education (Table 4).

Table 4 Multilevel analysis showing determinants of health faciity delivery among young mothers aged 15–24 years In Nigeria
Full size table

Women who lived in communities with high (AOR 2.09; 95% CI 1.41 – 3.10) and medium (AOR 2.49; 95% CI 1.42 – 4.38) levels of female education were more likely to have health facility delivery compared with those who reside in communities with low levels of female education. Women who lived in communities with high (AOR 1.50; 95% CI 1.41—3.10) and medium (AOR 1.73; 95% CI 1.42 – 4.38) levels of skilled prenatal support were more likely to have health facility delivery compared with those who reside in communities with low levels of skilled prenatal support. The odds of health facility delivery were higher among women who lived in communities with high (AOR 1.69; 95% CI 1.24 – 2.31) and medium (AOR 3.75; 95% CI 2.34 – 5.99) levels of transportation support compared with those with low transportation support. Women residing in Northeast (AOR 0.26; 95% CI 0.16 – 0.42), Northwest (AOR 0.10; 95% CI 0.53 – 0.20) and South-south (AOR 0.10; 95% CI 0.05 – 0.23) regions were less likely to utilize health facility for delivery compared with women from Northcentral. The value of ICC reduced to 37.09% when individual and community levels variables were fitted into the model. This implies that other factors have impact on health facility delivery apart from the community where the young mothers reside (Table 4).

Discussion

Only one in three of the young women delivered in health facility. This study showed that women with higher levels of education, women who had fewer children, women who attended more antenatal visits, women with higher wealth index, women whose partners had higher than secondary education were more likely to use health facility for delivery. Young women who lived in communities with higher levels of female education, skilled prenatal support, higher levels of transportation support were more likely to deliver their babies in a health facility.

The association of increased use of health facility for delivery with higher maternal education is similar to other studies that analyzed DHS reports of African countries [30,31,32,33,34]. Low maternal education has been a major impediment toward accessing skilled care at delivery among developing countries [32,33,34,35,36,37]. Improved health literacy among educated women makes them better informed about health care issues. This will reflect in their healthcare decisions. Partners’ education may have a similar effect as seen from findings in this study, as this will influence the partners’ decisions in issues of the family’s health. Improving education attainment of young women and girls can help improve health literacy, health seeking behaviours and ultimately, health facility delivery. Although Nigeria has made basic education officially free and compulsory, about 10 million of the country’s children aged 5–14 years are not in school [38]. Also more than just basic education would be required to influence young women’s attitudes and health seeking behaviours.

As number of children increased, the likelihood to have a facility delivery decreased. This was also reported among youth in Uganda [39] and among adolescents in Bangladesh [35]. This finding may be due to attitudinal factors as women who have more children may feel that they are more experienced with childbirth or because having a large family size means fewer resources to seek skilled delivery care. Another explanation could be that if the women had experienced poor quality care, or disrespect by health workers in a previous health facility delivery, they may choose not to have another health facility delivery. This calls for the need for proper training and supervision of health workers to ensure respectful maternal care.

Household wealth index was used as a proxy to socioeconomic status. With higher household wealth index, women were more likely to deliver at a health facility. Cost of services to deliver at a health facility is usually higher than at unorthodox centres or at home, hence this relationship [40]. Women who are poor may also find it difficult to afford transportation costs to health facilities compared with wealthier women. To reduce inequities between the rich and the poor, reducing financial barriers in access to health facility delivery is critical. This can be achieved by a functional health insurance scheme or free health schemes for poor pregnant women.

Having antenatal care of ≥ 4 visits and 1 – 3 visits had higher odds of facility delivery when compared to having no ANC visits. Women with ≥ 4 visits were 13 times more likely to utilize health facility for delivery. This finding is consistent with previous studies [34, 36, 37, 41]. Knowledge about the benefits of having skilled delivery care is likely to be higher among women who have regular antenatal visits [24]. Women who have regular antenatal visits are more likely to be knowledgeable about the consequences of complicated pregnancy, as well as the risks associated with home delivery. In addition, the same factors that influence utilization of antenatal care such as higher level of education, higher socioeconomic status may also influence choice of place of delivery.

Adolescents and young women often have lower levels of educational attainment and lower earnings and many don’t possess decision making autonomy. In our study less than a third of the participants participated in healthcare decisions, and our findings show that participation in healthcare decision did not influence the odds of health facility delivery. In a study among women of reproductive age using the 2018 NDHS however, high community level of female autonomy (proportion who solely takes decision or jointly with male partner on own healthcare) was associated with higher odds of institutional delivery [26]. This may imply that even when young women participate in decision making, they may not be empowered to make the right decisions regarding their health.

Identifying community variables that influence place of delivery can help inform maternal mortality reduction strategies. Solanke et al., reported that community skilled prenatal support and community transport support were associated with health facility delivery among women 15 to 49 years in Nigeria [26]. Our study found that the community characteristics: community level of poverty, community women’s education, community skilled prenatal support and community transport support influenced place of delivery. In designing interventions, special attention needs to be paid to communities with lower education, and higher levels of poverty. Schemes that provide skilled prenatal support for women in form of provision and equipping of skilled birth attendants in disadvantaged communities should be encouraged.

Young women living in communities with better transportation support were more likely to utilize health facility for delivery. Adolescents and young women may be less empowered to overcome obstacles including transportation obstacles in seeking healthcare. They may not have enough will power and disposable income to pay for more viable means of transportation, hence the association observed in our study. Interventions aimed at improving transportation support for women in labor including community led projects, and government led efforts should be instituted to encourage young women to visit health facilities which are often times a reasonable distance from their homes.

Women in Northeast and Northwestern regions of the country were less likely to utilize health facility for delivery. This finding is consistent with a secondary analysis of the 2008 NDHS [24]. Factors responsible for this may include the high level of poverty, illiteracy and also sociocultural beliefs in these regions [42, 43]. Women from the South-south region were also less likely to deliver in health facilities. The distribution of health facilities being fewer in the Northeast, Northwest and South-south zones could also contribute to the lower prevalence of health facility delivery in these regions [44].

Limitations

This study is not without limitations. The 2018 NDHS data were collected retrospectively and may be associated with recall bias. Due to the cross-sectional nature of the survey, it does not allow for causal inferences. Because this study uses secondary data with pre-defined variables, there is some data limitation e.g. “perceived distance to health facility as a problem” was used as an independent variable, instead of computed travel time/actual distance to health facility. In addition, the effect of marital status as a determinant of health facility delivery could not be accessed due to multi-collinearity. However, the study remains significant because it uses nationally representative data to determine predictors of health facility delivery among young Nigerian women.

Conclusion

Higher education attainment, having fewer children, attending frequent antenatal visits, being rich, having a partner with higher than secondary education, living in a community with higher levels of female education, skilled prenatal support, and higher levels of transportation support were associated with delivering at a health facility among young women. An understanding of these predisposing factors can guide maternal health programmes and schemes. These include promoting girl child education, encouraging respectful maternal care, reducing financial barriers in access to healthcare, promoting antenatal care, and improving skilled birth attendants and transportation support in disadvantaged communities should be encouraged.

Availability of data and materials

Data can be downloaded the measure DHS website https://dhsprogram.com after registration and requesting access.

Abbreviations

ANC:

Antenatal care

AOR:

Adjusted odds ratio

CMC:

Century month code

DHS:

Demographic health survey

EAs:

Enumeration areas

FCT:

Federal capital territory

HIV:

Human Immunodeficiency Virus

ICC:

Intra cluster correlation

NDHS:

Nigerian demographic and health survey

NHREC:

National health research ethics committee of Nigeria

NPHC:

The population and housing census of the federal republic of Nigeria

PSU:

Primary sampling unit

VIF:

Variance Inflation Factor

WHO:

World health organization

References

  1. WHO. Maternal mortality. 2019. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/maternal-mortality Accessed 20 July 2022.

  2. UNICEF. Maternal Mortality. 2021. Available from: https://data.unicef.org/topic/maternal-health/maternal-mortality/ Accessed 20 July 2022.

  3. WHO. Maternal health in Nigeria: generating information for action. 2019. Available from: https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/maternal-health-nigeria/en/ Accessed 20 July 2022.

  4. National Population Commission (NPC) [Nigeria] and ICF. 2019. Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey 2018. Abuja, Nigeria, and Rockville, Maryland, USA: NPC and ICF.

  5. Miller S, Belizán JM. The true cost of maternal death: Individual tragedy impacts family, community and nations. Reprod Health. 2015;12(1):10–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. National Research Council (US) Committee on Population. The Consequences of Maternal Morbidity and Maternal Mortality: Report of a Workshop. Reed HE, Koblinsky MA, Mosley WH, editors. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2000. PMID: 25077262.

  7. Kusiako T, Ronsmans C, Van Der Paal L. Perinatal mortality attributable to complications of childbirth in Matlab. Bangladesh Bull World Health Organ. 2000;78(5):621–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Vogel JP, Souza JP, Mori R, Morisaki N, Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, et al. Maternal complications and perinatal mortality: findings of the world health organization multicountry survey on maternal and newborn health. BJOG. 2014;121(Suppl):76–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yamin AE, Boulanger VM, Falb KL, Shuma J, Leaning J. Costs of inaction on maternal mortality: qualitative evidence of the impacts of maternal deaths on living children in Tanzania. PLoS One. 2013;8(8):e71674.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Whetten R, Messer L, Ostermann J, Whetten K, Pence BW, Buckner M, et al. Child work and labour among orphaned and abandoned children in five low and middle income countries. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2011;11(1):1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Bazile J, Rigodon J, Berman L, Boulanger VM, Maistrellis E, Kausiwa P, et al. Intergenerational impacts of maternal mortality: Qualitative findings from rural Malawi. Reprod Health. 2015;12(1):S1. Available from: http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/12/S1/S1.

  12. Moucheraud C, Worku A, Molla M, Finlay JE, Leaning J, Yamin AE. Consequences of maternal mortality on infant and child survival: A 25-year longitudinal analysis in Butajira Ethiopia (1987-2011). Reprod Health. 2015;12(1):S4. Available from: http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/12/S1/S4.

  13. Lisonkova S, Potts J, Muraca GM, Razaz N, Sabr Y, Chan WS, et al. Maternal age and severe maternal morbidity: A population-based retrospective cohort study. PLoS Med. 2017;14(5):1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. WHO. Adolescent Pregnancy. 2020. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/adolescent-pregnancy Accessed 20 July 2022.

  15. Azevedo WF, Diniz MB, Fonseca ES, Azevedo LM, Evangelista CB. Complications in adolescent pregnancy: systematic review of the literature. Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2015;13(4):618–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Calvert C, Baisley K, Doyle AM, Maganja K, Changalucha J, Watson-Jones D, et al. Risk factors for unplanned pregnancy among young women in Tanzania. J Fam Plan Reprod Heal Care. 2013;39(4):1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Francis SC, Mthiyane TN, Baisley K, Mchunu SL, Ferguson JB, Smit T, et al. Prevalence of sexually transmitted infections among young people in South Africa: A nested survey in a health and demographic surveillance site. PLoS Med. 2018;15(2):1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hoffmann H, Olson RE, Perales F, Baxter J. New mothers and social support: A mixed-method study of young mothers in Australia. J Sociol. 2021;57(4):950–68.

  19. Enuameh YAK, Okawa S, Asante KP, Kikuchi K, Mahama E, Ansah E, et al. Factors influencing health facility delivery in predominantly rural communities across the three ecological zones in Ghana: A cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(3):1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kifle MM, Kesete HF, Gaim HT, Angosom GS, Araya MB. Health facility or home delivery? Factors influencing the choice of delivery place among mothers living in rural communities of Eritrea. J Health Popul Nutr. 2018;37:22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Maternal Health Task Force. Five ways an innovative program increased facility birth in Nigeria. 2015. p. 1–5. Available from: https://www.mhtf.org/2015/01/13/five-ways-an-innovative-program-increased-facility-birth-in-nigeria/ Accessed 19 Jan 2023.

  22. UCSF. Strategies to increase health facility deliveries: Three case studies. 2014; Available from: https://globalhealthsciences.ucsf.edu/global-health-group/%0Aghg-publications Accessed 19 July 2023.

  23. Bolarinwa OA, Fortune E, Aboagye RG, Seidu AA, Olagunju OS, Nwagbara UI, et al. Health facility delivery among women of reproductive age in Nigeria: Does age at first birth matter? PLoS ONE. 2021;16(11):e0259250.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Ononokpono DN, Odimegwu CO. Determinants of maternal health care utilization in Nigeria: a multilevel approach. Pan Afr Med J. 2014;17(Suppl 1):2.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Adedokun ST, Uthman OA. Women who have not utilized health service for delivery in Nigeria: Who are they and where do they live? BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. LukmanSolanke B, Adebayo Rahman S, Olasupo OP. To what extent do community characteristics drive health facility delivery? findings among women who had recent live births in Nigeria. Heal Soc Care Community. 2021;29(4):992–1000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Olakunde BO, Adeyinka DA, Mavegam BO, Olakunde OA, Yahaya HB, Ajiboye OA, et al. Factors associated with skilled attendants at birth among married adolescent girls in Nigeria: evidence from the multiple indicator cluster survey, 2016/2017. Int Health. 2019;11(6):545–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rai RK, Singh PK, Singh L. Utilization of maternal health care services among married adolescent women: insights from the Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey, 2008. Womens Health Issues. 2012;22(4):e407–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. National Population Commission (NPC) [Nigeria] and ICF. 2019. 2018 Nigeria DHS Key Findings. Abuja, Nigeria and Rockville, Maryland, USA: NPC and ICF.

  30. Mumtaz S, Bahk J, Khang YH. Current status and determinants of maternal healthcare utilization in Afghanistan: analysis from Afghanistan demographic and health survey 2015. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(6):1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Dickson KS, Amu H. Determinants of skilled birth attendance in the northern parts of Ghana. Adv Public Heal. 2017;2017:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Dimbuene ZT, Amo-Adjei J, Amugsi D, Mumah J, Izugbara CO, Beguy D. Women’s education and utilization of maternal health services in Africa: A multi-country and socioeconomic status analysis. J Biosoc Sci. 2018;50(6):800–22.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Dankwah E, Zeng W, Feng C, Kirychuk S, Farag M. The social determinants of health facility delivery in Ghana. BMC Reprod Heal. 2019;16:1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Zegeye B, Ahinkorah BO, Idriss-wheelr D, Oladimeji O, Olorunsaiye CZ, Yaya S. Predictors of institutional delivery service utilization among women of reproductive age in Senegal : a population-based study. Public Health. 2021;79:5.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Shahabuddin ASM, Delvaux T, Utz B, Bardaji A, De Brouwere V. Determinants and trends in health facility-based deliveries and caesarean sections among married adolescent girls in Bangladesh. BMJ Open. 2016;6(9):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rahman MA, Rahman MA, Rawal LB, Paudel M, Howlader MH, Khan B, et al. Factors influencing place of delivery: Evidence from three south-Asian countries. PLoS One. 2021;16(4):0250012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Nahar MT, Anik SMF, Islam MA, Islam SMS. Individual and community-level factors associated with skilled birth attendants during delivery in Bangladesh: A multilevel analysis of demographic and health surveys. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(6):e0267660.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. UNICEF. Education. Available from: https://www.unicef.org/nigeria/education Accessed 25 July 2022.

  39. Agaba P, Magadi M, Orton B. Predictors of health facility childbirth among unmarried and married youth in Uganda. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(4):e0266657.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Kalu-Umeh N. Costs and patterns of financing maternal health care services in rural communities in northern nigeria: evidence for designing national fee exemption policy. Int J MCH AIDS. 2013;2(1):163–72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Solanke BL, Rahman SA. Multilevel analysis of factors associated with assistance during delivery in rural Nigeria: Implications for reducing rural-urban inequity in skilled care at delivery. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18(1):1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. UNICEF. Literacy among young women. Available from: https://www.unicef.org/nigeria/media/1631/file Accessed 10 July 2023.

  43. Jaiyeola AO, Choga I. Assessment of poverty incidence in Northern Nigeria. J Poverty. 2021;25(2):155–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Makinde OA, Sule A, Ayankogbe O, Boone D. Distribution of health facilities in Nigeria: implications and options for universal health coverage. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2018;33(4):e1179–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Community Medicine and Primary Care, Federal Medical Center, Abeokuta, Ogun State, Nigeria

    Tope Olubodun

  2. Department of Demography and Social Statistics, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile Ife, Osun State, Nigeria

    Semiu Adebayo Rahman

  3. Department of Community Health and Primary Care, College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria

    Oluwakemi Ololade Odukoya, Ifeoma P. Okafor & Mobolanle Rasheedat Balogun

Authors
  1. Tope Olubodun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Semiu Adebayo Rahman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Oluwakemi Ololade Odukoya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ifeoma P. Okafor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mobolanle Rasheedat Balogun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

TO, SAR, and OOO conceptualized the study. TO and SAR conducted the data analysis and wrote the first draft. All the authors contributed to the development of further versions of the manuscript, read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tope Olubodun.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Being a secondary data, we registered and obtained permission to download the requested datasets from the measure DHS website. The data were handled with confidentiality. The 2018 NDHS survey protocol was approved by the National Health Research Ethics Committee of Nigeria (NHREC) and the ICF Institutional Review Board. Written informed consents were obtained from all participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Olubodun, T., Rahman, S.A., Odukoya, O.O. et al. Determinants of health facility delivery among young mothers aged 15 – 24 years in Nigeria: a multilevel analysis of the 2018 Nigeria demographic and health survey. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 23, 185 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05492-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05492-x

Keywords

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

ISSN: 1471-2393

Contact us