Skip to main content

Advanced tubal pregnancy at 34 weeks with eclampsia and HELLP syndrome: a case report and literature re

Abstract

Background

Tubal ectopic pregnancies in the late stages of pregnancy are uncommon, and reports on their complications are scarce. We present the case of a woman who had a tubal ectopic pregnancy at around 34 weeks and developed severe pre-eclampsia complications.

Case

A 27-year-old woman presented to our hospital several times with vomiting and convulsions. A physical exam revealed hypertension, scattered ecchymosis, and a large abdominal mass. A computed tomography (CT) scan performed in an emergency revealed an empty uterus, a stillbirth baby in the abdominal cavity, and a crescent-shaped placenta. Blood tests revealed that the patient had a low platelet count and clotting dysfunction. Laparotomy confirmed advanced right fallopian tube pregnancy without rupture, and salpingectomy was performed. Pathological examination revealed a significantly thickened tubal wall, adhesion of the placenta, and poor placental perfusion.

Conclusion

The unusually thickened muscular layer of the tube may be one of the reasons for tubal pregnancy progressing to an advanced stage. Placenta adhesion and the special site to which it is attached reduce the risk of rupture. The detection of a crescent-shaped placenta on imaging may aid in the accurate diagnosis, distinguishing between abdominal and tubal pregnancy. Women with advanced ectopic pregnancy are more likely to develop pre-eclampsia and have poorer maternal-fetal outcomes. These negative outcomes may be influenced by abnormal artery remodeling, villous dysplasia, and placental infarction.

Peer Review reports

Background

Tubal pregnancy, which accounts for 94% of all ectopic pregnancies [1], is always treated early for the typical clinical manifestations of amenorrhea, bleeding, and abdominal pain, as well as massive intraperitoneal hemorrhage. Almost 80% of them have ruptured fallopian tubes during early pregnancy due to a thin wall [2, 3]. Therefore, there are few reports of late-stage cases, particularly with complications that always occur in normal pregnancy. We present the case of a woman with tubal pregnancy at 34 weeks who was admitted to our hospital for pre-eclampsia with a series of severe complications rather than abdominal pain or massive hemorrhage.

Case report

On August 18, 2022, a 27-year-old woman, gravida 3, para 1, was referred to our hospital with complaints of vomiting and convulsions. She was unconscious and under the influence of intravenous diazepam when she arrived. Her last menstrual period was unknown; however, her relatives reported an irregular menstrual pattern for 8 months. Her first child died at 27 weeks for unknown reasons, and she gave birth to a live male baby in our hospital a year later. Albuminuria was confirmed in both pregnancies without hypertension. Her family history was unremarkable.

Her blood pressure, respiratory rate, pulse rate, and temperature were all 190/139 mmHg, 25/min, 150/min, and 36.8 °C, respectively, on physical examination. Her skin was covered in ecchymosis, and she had significant edema in the lower part of her shank. A soft mass with a fetus of more than 8 months and no heart tones was discovered during an abdominal examination using Doppler ultrasound. Without dilation, a vaginal examination revealed a long, thick cervix.

Her laboratory parameters were abnormal; alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, lactate dehydrogenase, amylase, and creatinine levels were elevated up to 195 U/L(normal reference value:7–40 U/L), 755 U/L(13–35 U/L), 2355 U/L(120–250 U/L), 227 U/L(0–100 U/L), and 341.6 μmol/L(41–73 μmol/L), respectively. Blood clotting test revealed coagulation dysfunction, with an activated partial thromboplastin time of 24.00 s, fibrin degradation product level of 94.10 mg/L, and D-dimer level of 22.74 mg/L. Her hemoglobin levels were normal, but her platelet count had dropped to 46 × 109/L, and her proteinuria was + 2.

An abdominal ultrasound revealed an empty uterus and an extra-uterine fetus with no heartbeat or movement; the fetus’ estimated gestational age was 34 weeks. Following contrast-enhanced CT, these findings were confirmed (Fig. 1). An abdominal pregnancy was thus suspected. A CT scan also revealed mild cerebral edema (Fig. 2), hydrocholecystis, and an enlarged pancreas.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Abdominal CT revealing an empty uterus and a longitudinal fetus outside

Fig. 2
figure 2

Head CT revealing extensive narrowing of the cerebral sulcus and a decrease in the density of the bilateral basal ganglia and centrum semiovale, indicating cerebral edema

An emergency laparotomy was performed based on the findings of abdominal pregnancy and eclampsia. The abdomen was entered without incident while under general anesthesia. A female stillbirth weighing 2.1 kg was delivered from the intact amniotic sac, which was completely enveloped in the right unruptured salpinx. The uterus, left fallopian tube, and ovaries appeared normal (Fig. 3). The placenta measured 15 × 10 × 2 cm in size and covered the majority of the ampulla cavity. Due to the dense adhesion, the surgeons were unable to separate it from the tissue. A right salpingectomy was carried out. The total amount of blood lost was 800 mL. Six units of cryoprecipitate and four units of packed fresh frozen plasma were transfused during the procedure. Following the operation, she was transferred to the intensive care unit. To control blood pressure, nitroglycerin and urapidil were administered intravenously via a micropump. Additionally, concentrated platelets were infused to boost counts, and ceftriaxone was given to prevent infection. Fortunately, the patient regained consciousness 2 days later and was released 18 days later. A one-month follow-up visit revealed normal blood pressure and no albuminuria.

Fig. 3
figure 3

The placenta was located in the enlarged ampulla of the right fallopian tube, which was connected to the ipsilateral horn via the thickened and prolonged isthmus. The left fallopian tube, bilateral ovaries, and uterus were normal in appearance

The myometrium of the tube was significantly thickened, and the myocytes were hypertrophic, according to histopathogical examination. Furthermore, the placenta had adhered directly to the musculature due to the absence of the decidual plate. There were no trophoblasts invading the inner wall of the poorly remodelled artery, and a large number of villus cells had lost their nuclei, with syncytiotrophoblast nuclei aggregating along the villi, known as syncytial knots; some terminal villi were elongated, less branched, and sparse, and some did not have vessels (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Pathological findings under a microscope revealing several remarkable manifestations and no artery remodeling. A The muscular layer of the oviduct wall was obviously thickened, the decidual plate placenta was absent, and the placenta was adhering directly to the musculature; B Most trophocytes had lost their nuclei, with inadequate blood supply; C Several terminal villi had become elongated, less branched, and sparse and some did not have vessels; D Aggregation of syncytiotrophoblast nuclei was along villi to form syncytial knots

Discussion and conclusion

Why some tube pregnancies can reach the second or third trimester?

The tube wall struggles to accommodate the gradually increasing sac and trophoblast erosion, frequently resulting in rupture at 7.2 ± 2.2 weeks [4]. However, a few cases of advanced gestation have been reported: 14 [5], 15 [6], 17 [7], 29 [8], 42 [9], 45, and 50 [10] weeks. In our case, an 8-month-old fetus and appendage were discovered in the intact tube cavity and were evaluated by CT and ultrasound at 34 weeks. According to Lichtenstein and Schumann, placental development occurs at a point along the mesosalpinx attachment line, and adequate blood supply and greater elasticity of the tube wall are important factors. Christopher proposed that adhesion could have also been a source of blood supply for the sac [11]. In our case, the patient did not have synechia surrounding the oviduct; however, her placenta almost completely covered the inner side of the tube, including the location mentioned by Lichtenstein and Schumann. We also noticed that the thickness of the tube wall was approximately 0.5 cm, which was significantly thicker than normal; we suspected that these two factors were the primary causes of the no rupture. Pathological examination revealed only a few hypertrophic myocytes, which resembled the myometrium in a normal pregnancy.

How to distinguish tubal pregnancy from abdominal pregnancy in the advanced trimester?

A paraovarian mass, thickened fallopian tube, uterine endometrium with a ≤ 10 mm thickness, and a high echo are all indicators of an early tubal pregnancy [12]. Based on these considerations, early diagnosis becomes simple. On the other hand, sonographic findings based on diagnosis are less useful in the advanced stage and always mimic abdominal pregnancy until laparotomy is performed for similar clinic manifestations and imaging characteristics [13, 14]. In our case, the woman did not have abdominal pain and mistook her irregular bleeding for a menstrual disorder, causing her to miss her early ultrasonic examination. When she was admitted to the hospital in late pregnancy, her condition was misdiagnosed as abdominal pregnancy until the surgeon entered his abdominal cavity. According to Joseph et al., a well-defined gestational sac with a crescent placenta most likely represented a tubal pregnancy in the second trimester. In contrast, a misshapen sac with a flattened placenta most likely represented an abdominal pregnancy [14]. We also discovered the same crescent-shaped placenta in the MRI figure reported by Baruah [13]. After that, we reviewed our CT images and discovered the same crescent-shaped placenta (Fig. 5). While the placenta is obviously attached to the inner side of the fallopian tube, it is slightly curled inward to accommodate the round tube cavity, giving the placenta the appearance of a curved moon when viewed longitudinally. In an abdominal pregnancy, however, the placenta does not have to be curved because it usually lies flat on the surface of the omentums, bowel, or mesentery. By using different CT or MRI imaging, we can distinguish tubal pregnancy from an abdominal pregnancy. These findings support our recommendation of CT as an alternative technique for distinguishing between these two advanced extra-uterine pregnancies without considering the fetus. In emergency rooms, CT scans are more easily obtained than MRIs.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Sagittal- or coronal-view CT revealing crescent placenta

What is the status of pre-eclampsia in ectopic pregnancies?

Worldwide, 3-5% of intrauterine pregnancies have pre-eclampsia [15]. Except for a few case reports, there are no statistics on ectopic pregnancy due to its low incidence. Using the keywords “ectopic/extra-uterine/tubal/abdominal/residual horn pregnancy” and “hypertensive disorder of pregnancy/pre-eclampsia/eclampsia/HELLP syndrome/thrombocytopenia/coagulation dysfunction” in PubMed, we collected 17 English reports, including 26 cases with hypertensive disorder of pregnancy or pre-eclampsia and relative complications” (Table 1) [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]. In summary, almost all patients had pre-eclampsia (25, 96.15%), with 24 having severe pre-eclampsia (92.31%) and 9 having eclampsia (34.62%), both of which were significantly higher than those observed in normal pregnancies as reported by Baig et al. (34.5 and 8.5%, respectively) [33]. However, until ours, no case of HELLP syndrome has been reported. In addition, there were 15 fetal or neonatal deaths, 7 had intrauterine growth restriction, and 12 were low-birth-weight infants, except for 9 live births and 2 unknown births. Ectopic pregnancy with pre-eclampsia appears to have negative consequences for both the mother and the fetus.

Table 1 Cases of ectopic pregnancy with the hypertensive disorder

Although the pathogenesis is complex, most researchers believe that impaired extravillous trophoblast infiltration, which results in abnormal spiral artery remodeling, causes maternal vascular malperfusion and resistance elevation [34, 35]. What about in the case of a tubal pregnancy? For the first time, the pathological characteristics of the placenta in an ectopic pregnancy with pre-eclampsia were revealed in our report. Because the decidua was missing, the placenta attached directly to the musculature, as Radaelli reported [36]. The placenta was severely infarcted, and the terminal villi were underdeveloped. Because of endometrial agenesis of the salpinx tissue and insufficient blood supply, artery remodeling may have been abnormal, resulting in poor placental perfusion and possibly causing pre-eclampsia in women with advanced tubal pregnancy.

Hypoperfusion of the placenta leads to placental ischemia and placental factors release into the maternal circulation. These events trigger a series of immune responses and lead to various complex and serious manifestations [36,37,38,39]. It is not known if there will be a more intense response in women with tubal pregnancy with less placental perfusion. Except for eclampsia and HELLP syndrome, this women’s brain, gallbladder, pancreas, and kidneys were all involved. As mentioned above, women with ectopic pregnancy with the hypertensive disorder may have a higher risk of developing severe conditions. However, Hailu et al. and Han et al. reported that there is no clue to manifest this relationship [32, 40], and more clinical case studies and explorations are needed.

Advanced tubal pregnancy is uncommon. The unusually thickened muscular layer, placenta adhesion, and the unique location of placenta implantation could be the cause. The identification of crescent-shaped placenta on imaging is valuable in the accurate diagnosis, distinguishing from abdominal pregnancy. Physicians should also keep an eye out for complications; women with advanced-stage ectopic pregnancy are more likely to develop pre-eclampsia and have poorer maternal-fetal outcomes. These negative outcomes may be influenced by abnormal artery remodeling, villous dysplasia, and placental infarction.

Availability of data and materials

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Abbreviations

HELLP:

Hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

CT:

Computed tomography

References

  1. Suresh A, Devasia JM, Adla B, Balachandran A, YVS. A study on ectopic pregnancies in a tertiary care Centre. J Evid Based Med Healthcare. 2019;6(24):1654–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Li P-C, Lin W-Y, Ding D-C. Risk factors and clinical characteristics associated with a ruptured ectopic pregnancy: a 19-year retrospective observational study. Medicine. 2022;101(24):e29514.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Kellan Schallert MD, DeAngelis G, et al. Common and uncommon imaging presentations of ectopic pregnancy. Contemp Diagnostic Rodiol. 2018;41(15):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gari R, Abdulgader R, Abdulqader O. A live 13 weeks ruptured ectopic pregnancy: a case report. Cureus. 2020;12(10):e10993.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Elmoheen A, Salem W, Eltawagny M, et al. The largest tubal pregnancy: 14th week. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2020;2020:4728730.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Stremick JK, Couperus K, Ashworth SW. Ruptured tubal ectopic pregnancy at fifteen weeks gestational age. Clin Pract Cases Emerg Med. 2019;3(1):62–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Drakou A, Cosmo E, Ehrstedt C, et al. Tubal pregnancy with fetus in situ in the 17th gestational week, a case report. Lakartidningen. 2020;117:FX4F.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hong LJ, Chen SS, Oshiro BT. Third trimester tubal pregnancy. A case report. J Reprod Med. 2015;60(1–2):83–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Frachtman KG. Unruptured tubal term pregnancy. Am J Surg. 1953;86(2):161–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. van der Bijl P, Mabesa TP. Tubal pregnancy beyond term. S Afr Med J. 2007;97(3):184–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schokman CM. Advanced tubal pregnancy: a case of survival of mother and baby. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1966;6(2):171–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chu R-R, Liu D-F, Wang M, Liu L. Ultrasonographic diagnosis of early unruptured tubal pregnancy in a community hospital. J Int Med Res. 2020;48(5):0300060519894436.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Baruah S, Latthe P, Downey GP. Presentation of advanced tubal pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004;23(4):435–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu J, Khan A, Johnson S, Grigorian C, Li T. The usefulness of gestational sac and placental sonographic morphology in differentiating between second-trimester tubal and abdominal pregnancy: case report and a review of literature. J Clin Ultrasound. 2014;42(3):162–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Abalos E, Cuesta C, Grosso AL, Chou D, Say L. Global and regional estimates of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia: a systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;170(1):1–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Allen E. Abdominal pregnancy complicated by eclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1933;25(5):753–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lash AF. Reported a case of preeclmpsia in an abdominal pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1938;95(5):139–40.

  18. Pride CB, Morgantown WV, Rucker MP, Richmond V. Eclampsia and ovarian pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1942;44(4):575–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Benjamin F, Craig CJT. Uterine distension and preeclamptic toxaemia. BJOG. 1961;68(5):827–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Felbo M, Fenger HJ. Combined extra-and intrauterine pregnancy carried to term. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1966;45(2):140–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Clark JF, Niles JH. Abdominal pregnancy associated with toxemia of pregnancy. Report of two cases and review of the literature. J Natl Med Assoc. 1967;59(1):22–4.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Paterson WG, Grant KA. Advanced intraligamentous pregnancy. Report of a case, review of the literature and a discussion of the biological implications. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1975;30(11):715–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Baehler RW, Copeland WE, Stein JH, Ferris TF. Plasma renin and aldosterone in an abdominal pregnancy with toxemia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1975;122(5):545–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Anderton KJ, Duncan SLB, Lunt RL. Advanced abdominal pregnancy with severe pre-eclampsia. BJOG. 1976;83(1):90–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ekwempu CC. Continuation of abdominal pregnancy complicated by pre-eclampsia three weeks after birth of an intrauterine twin. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1979;16(4):324–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Moodley JSKTSD, Pitsoe SB. Advanced extra-uterine pregnancy associated with eclampsia-a report of 2 cases. S Afr Med J. 1987;71(7):460–1.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Emembolu JO. Rudimentary horn pregnancy associated with pre-eclampsia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1989;30(4):367–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Piering WF, Garancis JG, Becker CG, Beres JA, Lemann J Jr. Preeclampsia related to a functioning extra-uterine placenta: report of a case and 25-year follow-up. Am J Kidney Dis. 1993;21(3):310–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Seki H, Ki K, Takeda S, Kinoshita K. Ovarian pregnancy diagnosed in the third trimester: a case report. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 1997;23(6):543–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. De Muelenaere HM. Advanced abdominal pregnancy and pre-eclampsia: a case report and literature review. Obstet Gynaecol Forum. 2003;13(3):22–6.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ekele BA, Adamu AN, Ladan H, Abitare H. Eclampsia in advanced abdominal pregnancy. Niger J Clin Pract. 2007;10(4):343–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hailu FG, Yihunie GT, Essa AA. Advanced abdominal pregnancy, with live fetus and severe pre-eclampsia, case report. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):243.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Rafiq Baig JA, Jamal MM. Maternal and perinatal outcome in pregnancy induced hypertensive mothers in combined military hospital, Sialkot. Pak Armed Forces Med J. 2020;70(4):896–901.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kaufmann P, Black S, Huppertz B. Endovascular trophoblast invasion: implications for the pathogenesis of intrauterine growth retardation and pre-eclampsia. Biol Reprod. 2003;69(1):1–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Osol G, Mandala M. Maternal uterine vascular remodeling during pregnancy. Physiology. 2009;24(1):58–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Levine RJ, Lam C, Qian C, Yu KF, Maynard SE, Sachs BP, et al. Soluble endoglin and other circulating antiangiogenic factors in pre-eclampsia. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(17):1840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Rana S, Lemoine E, Granger JP, Karumanchi SA. Pre-eclampsia: pathophysiology, challenges, and perspectives. Circ Res. 2019;124(7):1094–112.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Flint EJ, Cerdeira AS, Redman CW, Vatish M. The role of angiogenic factors in the management of pre-eclampsia. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019;98(6):700–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Simon-Tillaux N, Lecarpentier E, Tsatsaris V, Hertig A. Sildenafil for the treatment of pre-eclampsia, an update: should we still be enthusiastic? Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2019;34(11):1819–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Han H, Wang S. A case report of rudimentary horn pregnancy complicated with pre-eclampsia. Chin J Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2000;1(2):101.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the whole team members involved in the management.

Funding

This research was funded by a feasibility study of early urethral tube extraction in gynecological surgery based on Enhanced Recovery After Surgery(ERAS) from Science and Technology Bureau of Deyang City, grant number 2021SZZ084.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization, Yang Liu, Xiaoping Xu and Qian Liu were involved in drafting the manuscript. Yang Liu and Xiaoping Xu wrote the paper, and the manuscript was reviewed and edited by Xiaolan Luo, Bin Cai, Jingyuan He and Ruiqian Liu. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruiqian Liu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of Deyang People’s Hospital. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent has been obtained from the patient to publish this paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Y., Xu, X., Liu, Q. et al. Advanced tubal pregnancy at 34 weeks with eclampsia and HELLP syndrome: a case report and literature re. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 23, 142 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05469-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05469-w

Keywords