Skip to main content
Download PDF

Effect of the ratios of estradiol increase on the outcome of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer with antagonist regimens: a single center retrospective cohort study

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth volume 23, Article number: 134 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The outcome of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF) is often determined according to follicle and estradiol levels following gonadotropin stimulation. In previous studies, although most of them analyzed the estrogen level from ovaries or the average estrogen level of a single follicle, there was no study on the ratio of estrogen increase, which was also correlated with pregnancy outcomes in the clinic. This study aimed to make timely adjustments to follow-up medication to improve clinical outcomes based on the potential value of estradiol growth rate.

Methods

We comprehensively analyzed estrogen growth during the entire ovarian stimulation period. Serum estradiol levels were measured on the day of gonadotropin treatment (Gn1), five days later (Gn5), eight days later (Gn8), and on the trigger day (HCG). This ratio was used to determine the increase in estradiol levels. According to the ratio of estradiol increase, the patients were divided into four groups: A1 (Gn5/Gn1 ≤ 6.44), A2 (6.44 < Gn5/Gn1 ≤ 10.62), A3 (10.62 < Gn5/Gn1 ≤ 21.33), and A4 (Gn5/Gn1 > 21.33); B1 (Gn8/Gn5 ≤ 2.39), B2 (2.39 < Gn8/Gn5 ≤ 3.03), B3 (3.03 < Gn8/Gn5 ≤ 3.84), and B4 (Gn8/Gn5 > 3.84). We analyzed and compared the relationship between data in each group and pregnancy outcomes.

Results

In the statistical analysis, the estradiol levels of Gn5 (P = 0.029, P = 0.042), Gn8 (P < 0.001, P = 0.001), and HCG (P < 0.001, P = 0.002), as well as Gn5/Gn1 (P = 0.004, P = 0.006), Gn8/Gn5 (P = 0.001, P = 0.002), and HCG/Gn1 (P < 0.001, P < 0.001) both had clinical guiding significance, and lower one significantly reduced the pregnancy rate. The outcomes were positively linked to groups A (P = 0.036, P = 0.043) and B (P = 0.014, P = 0.013), respectively. The logistical regression analysis revealed that group A1 (OR = 0.376 [0.182–0.779]; P = 0.008*, OR = 0.401 [0.188–0.857]; P = 0.018*) and B1 (OR = 0.363 [0.179–0.735]; P = 0.005*, OR = 0.389 [0.187–0.808]; P = 0.011*) had opposite influence on outcomes.

Conclusion

Maintaining a serum estradiol increase ratio of at least 6.44 on Gn5/Gn1 and 2.39 on Gn8/Gn5 may result in a higher pregnancy rate, especially in young people.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

During in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles, controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) treatment using exogenous gonadotropin (Gn) to stimulate follicle development is a critical step in ensuring the acquisition of mature eggs and a satisfactory pregnancy rate. In clinical practice, assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes are often monitored according to the size and number of follicles and serum estradiol (E2) levels after Gn stimulation. However, no accurate indicator to predict pregnancy outcomes has been identified to date, and it has not been determined how to choose subsequent drugs and doses based on the ovarian response after stimulation.

Additionally, the need for combined monitoring (using transvaginal ultrasound and serum estradiol) during ovarian stimulation is controversial. Some people argued that vaginal ultrasound alone should be considered to simplify treatment, as combined monitoring is costly, time-consuming, and inconvenient [1]. Neither E2 on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration nor other stages were linked to pregnancy rates in women undergoing ART cycles [2,3,4,5]. Additionally, E2 level was found to be a poor predictor of treatment success [6]. However, the evidence has a low overall quality [7]. Additionally, other researchers have suggested that E2 levels can be used to predict pregnancy outcomes in combination with FSH, age, inhibin B, and other factors [8,9,10,11]. Some researchers have suggested that a poor ovarian response can be characterized by peak E2 levels [12]. Phelps et al. and Kahyaoglu et al. [13, 14] explored the relationship between E2 levels on the fourth day of Gn and IVF outcomes and believed that estradiol levels on the fourth day of COH cycle could predict the response of early follicles to ovarian stimulation. When the serum estradiol level on the fourth day of Gn was low, the current treatment cycle was abandoned. Other groups concluded that a low E2 concentration after five days of Gn stimulation predicted a high cycle cancellation and lower pregnancy outcome, even with similar numbers of oocytes and fertilization rates [15]. Lower E2 levels on the sixth day of Gn have also been associated with a lower pregnancy rate and the likelihood of live births [8, 16, 17]. It has been reported that an appropriate range for E2 exists, and a higher range is not beneficial [18, 19]. Older women (> 35 years) appeared to be more vulnerable to the harmful effects of high E2 levels than younger women (≤ 35 years). Valbuena et al. [20, 21] found that high E2 concentration affects embryonic adhesion. Additionally, high E2 concentration affects endometrial receptivity [22,23,24,25]. However, Blazar et al. [26,27,28] discovered that higher E2 levels on hCG days predicted a greater number of oocytes, and any adverse impact on endometrial can be conquered in IVF-ET. Only the estradiol level on the hCG day was a significant predictive variable for clinical pregnancy [29, 30]. Additionally, according to percentile curves, Papageorgiou et al. [31] did not identify any deleterious effects of high E2 levels. Super physiological estradiol levels also do not affect oocyte and embryo quality [32].

Everyone had different opinions on determining E2 in COH cycle, but it was undeniable that determining E2 during follicular phase has become a part of routine clinical practice over the last decade. In previous studies, most of them only analyzed the estrogen level, and there was no study on the ratio of estrogen increase, although different people had different antral follicle counts and different average estrogen levels of a single follicle. Estrogen levels represent the static condition of the ovarian response and do not reflect the dynamic state of exogenous control of ovarian stimulation on follicular growth. Thus, this study aimed to determine whether serum E2 levels and E2 increase ratios during Gn ovarian stimulation correlated with IVF and pregnancy outcomes in 335 patients on antagonist regimens. Additionally, this study aimed to determine the link between E2 levels and ratios in the whole Gn stimulation period and the outcomes, and the number of embryos was investigated to distinguish E2 effects on the endometrium and embryos. If this hypothesis is substantiated, it may be time to seek a new method to evaluate the ovarian response during Gn stimulation, adjust the dose, and ensure treatment outcome of COH.

Materials and methods

Study subjects and protocol

From April 2017 to July 2020, our center conducted a retrospective analysis of infertile patients who underwent IVF cycles. The women were monitored until live birth or until the embryos in the current cycle had been completed. The study protocol was approved by the institutional human ethics committee.

Inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) age ≤ 38 years, 2) basal follicle-stimulating hormone (bFSH) ≤ 10 IU/L, basal antral follicle count (bAFC) > 3, and 3) body mass index (BMI) < 30 kg/m2.

Exclusion criteria were as follows: 1) patients with chromosomal abnormalities, reproductive malformation, and a history of recurrent spontaneous abortion; 2) patients undergoing coasting to prevent ovarian hyper stimulation syndrome; 3) insufficient information; 4) uterine pathologies that might compromise pregnancy potential; and 5) cycles canceled due to failure of embryo thawing and survival.

Ovarian stimulation protocol

Patients received IVF treatment according to the Fixed GnRH antagonist protocol [33]. On the second day of the menstrual cycle, recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone 150–300 U (Gonal-F; Merck, Lyon, France; Puregon, MSD, Boulogne, France) was injected as Gn. Additionally, Gn doses were determined based on patient age, body mass index (BMI), bFSH, and bAFC. GnRH-ant (Cetrotide, Merck, Lyon, France) was administered from day 5 onward. Oocytes were then collected by follicular aspiration under ultrasound 34–36 h after triggering with GnRH-a (Triptoreline, Decapeptyl, Ipsen, France) or recombinant hCG (rhCG, Ovitrelle, Merck, Lyon, France). Eighteen hours after fertilization, embryo development was monitored daily and graded based on the number and size of blastomeres, fragmentation rate, multinucleation, and early densification. Notably, on the third day following oocyte retrieval, an embryo with seven–ten blastomeres was defined as high quality [34].

On day 3, one or two embryos in the best shape were selected and transferred using a soft Wallace catheter, or whole embryo freezing for vitrification was chosen to avoid ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), embryo–endometrium asynchrony, and other reasons.

For luteal support in advance of fresh embryo transfer (ET), we used an injection of progesterone (20 mg/branch, Zhejiang Xianju Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.), 40 mg daily, and oral dydrogesterone tablets (10 mg/tablet, Abbott Healthcare Products B.V.), 30 mg per day, or progesterone vaginal sustained-release gel (90 mg/dose, Crinone VR 8%, Merck, Sherano, Switzerland). In addition, two bags of Chinese medicine, the Gushen Antai pills, were used daily. For the frozen embryo transfer (FET), the endometrial preparation protocols used before the FET were natural cycles, hormone replacement cycles, and stimulated cycles. Embryo transfer was performed after three days of progesterone supplementation. For natural cycles and hormone replacement cycles, progesterone supplementation was added, similar to the cycle of fresh embryo transfer. Stimulated cycle protocols for endometrial preparation were not supplemented with progesterone.

All patients completed an IVF cycle and then performed ET or FET until live birth or until the embryos in the current cycle were used up.

Calculation of serum E2

Venous blood samples were collected on the day of Gn (Gn1), on five days of Gn (Gn5), on eight days of Gn (Gn8), and the day of trigger (HCG). In addition, Gn5/Gn1, Gn8/Gn5, HCG/Gn1, HCG/Gn5, and HCG/Gn8 represented the ratios of serum E2 increase. The ratios were calculated as follows: Gn5 divided by Gn1, Gn8 divided by Gn5, HCG divided by Gn1, HCG divided by Gn5, and HCG divided by Gn8.

Pregnancy outcomes

Cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included cumulative clinical pregnancy rate (CCPR), number of oocytes, number of fertilization, number of blastomeres, number of embryos, and number of high-quality embryos.

CLBR was defined as the first live birth after using fresh or frozen embryos derived from a single ovarian stimulation cycle.

Clinical pregnancy was defined as an intrauterine gestational sac with a fetal heartbeat detected on transvaginal ultrasonography after six weeks of gestation. CCPR was calculated as the number of first clinical pregnancies generated from a single IVF cycle, including all fresh and frozen embryo transfers generated from the IVF cycle.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS version 26.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The Shapiro–Wilk test was used to assess data normality. Due to skewed distributions, quantitative variables were expressed as medians (interquartile range, range between the 25th and 75th percentiles), and Mann–Whitney U and Kruskal–Wallis tests were performed. Qualitative variables were expressed as frequencies and analyzed using chi-square test. P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Groups A and B were defined according to the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles of each ratio of E2 increase. According to the ratio of estradiol increase, the patients were divided into four groups: A1 (Gn5/Gn1 ≤ 6.44), A2 (6.44 < Gn5/Gn1 ≤ 10.62), A3 (10.62 < Gn5/Gn1 ≤ 21.33), and A4 (Gn5/Gn1 > 21.33); B1 (Gn8/Gn5 ≤ 2.39), B2 (2.39 < Gn8/Gn5 ≤ 3.03), B3 (3.03 < Gn8/Gn5 ≤ 3.84), and B4 (Gn8/Gn5 > 3.84).

Spearman’s correlations were used to determine the correlation between the quantitative parameters and the increase in E2 levels. The propensity scores were calculated using binary logistic regression analysis based on the following patient characteristics: female age, infertility duration, body mass index (BMI), infertility factors, Gn usage time, and Gn dosage. We calculated crude odds ratios (OR) and adjusted OR with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results

Study population

From April 2017 to July 2020, we retrospectively analyzed 335 patients who received in vitro fertilization (IVF) with antagonist regimens at the Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Table 1 summarizes the characteristics of the study population for positive and negative CCPR and CLBR results. CCPR positives included 160 patients, and negative s included 175 patients. A total of 124 women had viable CLBR, whereas 211 did not.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics for CCPR and CLBR
Full size table

Baseline characteristics

Positive and negative results were similar for BMI, infertility duration, Gn days, number of embryos transferred, endometrial thickness on transplantation day, and baseline hormone levels.

However, patients with CCPR and CLBR positive results were younger than those with negative results (P = 0.001 and P = 0.006, respectively) and had a lower Gn dosage (P = 0.001 and P = 0.005)). The patients with CCPR and CLBR positives had more antral follicle counts (P < 0.001 and P = 0.001). The patients with CCPR and CLBR positives achieved better IVF-ET outcomes (both P < 0.001), such as the number of oocytes, fertilization, blastomere, and embryos.

Serum estradiol levels and ratios of CCPR and CLBR

Table 2 compares the outcomes based on E2 levels and ratios. Gn1 did not impact IVF outcomes (P = 0.134; P = 0.122). However, elevated E2 levels following gonadotropin stimulation correlated with higher CCPR and CLBR (both P < 0.05), particularly in the late follicular phase, E2 of Gn8 (P < 0.001; P = 0.001), and HCG (P < 0.001; P = 0.002). However, in early follicular growth, the estrogen increase ratios were more statistically significant with the outcomes. Following gonadotropin stimulation, the higher the serum estradiol ratios of Gn5/Gn1 (group A) and Gn8/Gn5 (group B), the higher the CCPR (P = 0.004; P = 0.001) and CLBR (P = 0.006; P = 0.002, respectively). In contrast, estrogen ratios of HCG/Gn5 and HCG/Gn8 in late follicle growth were similar across groups without reaching statistical significance.

Table 2 The level and the ratio of serum E2 for CCPR and CLBR
Full size table

Parameters of different serum estradiol ratios

According to Table 3, data were classified into four groups based on the quartile of serum E2 ratio. As displayed in Table 3, although group A exhibited no significant differences in terms of female age, BMI, and infertility time, group B indicated significant differences (both P < 0.05). For group A, the higher the estrogen growth rate, the shorter the Gn time required and the lower the Gn dose used (both P < 0.001), whereas for group B, the opposite was true (both P < 0.005). However, when estrogen growth rate increased, groups A and B produced superior IVF-ET outcomes in terms of the number of embryos harvested, blastomeres, embryos, CCPR, CLBR, etc. (both P < 0.05). The ratio in group A increased as the ratio in group B decreased (P < 0.001). When the ratio in group B was larger, the corresponding ratio in group A was smaller. When the values of the two groups were higher, E2 levels on the hCG day were also higher (both P < 0.001).

Table 3 Parameters and outcome of IVF-ET as a function of serum E2 ratios
Full size table

Serum estradiol ratio of different ages

As illustrated in Table 4, there were 252 patients in the < group with age below 35 years old and 83 in the other group. The number of eggs obtained and high-quality embryos were statistically significant with the different E2 ratios of Gn5/Gn1, Gn8/Gn5 and HCG/Gn1 in both groups with age < 35 and age ≥ 35 (both P < 0.001). For people with age < 35, the higher ratios of Gn8/Gn5 and HCG/Gn1 could achieve the higher CCPR and CLBR (both P < 0.05). In contrast, the difference was not statistically significant with the E2 ratio of Gn5/Gn1. For people with age ≥ 35, the CCPR and CLBR were higher with the E2 ratio of HCG/Gn1. However, the differences were insignificant with Gn5/Gn1 and Gn8/Gn5.

Table 4 Relationship between the ratio of serum E2 and the outcome according to age
Full size table

Serum estradiol ratio of different infertility factors

Infertility factors included tubal factors (231, 68.9%), ovulation disorders (64, 19.1%), male factors (27, 8.1%), pelvic endometriosis (8, 2.4%), and other factors (5, 1.5%). Table 5 indicates that groups A and B did not correlate with varying infertility factors.

Table 5 Relationship between serum E2 increase and infertility factors
Full size table

Estradiol levels and ratios of different ovarian responses

Estradiol levels and ratios of different ovarian responses were displayed in Table 6. We divided the population into three parts according to the number of oocytes retrieved, high ovarian responders (> 18 oocytes retrieved), low ovarian responders (< 6 oocytes retrieved), and normal ovarian responders groups. After analysis respectively, just the E2 ratio of Gn8/Gn5 had statistically significant. For the low ovarian response and normal ovarian response, the CLBR positive one had higher E2 ratio (P < 0.001; P = 0.017, respectively). In the high response group, the E2 ratio with CLBR positive was lower than that with CLBR negative (P = 0.004). However due to the small sample size post-treatment, this result requires further verification.

Table 6 The level and the ratios of serum E2 for different ovarian responses
Full size table

Effects of estradiol ratios on IVF-ET outcome

As indicated in Table 7, logistic regression analysis revealed that both group A1 (OR = 0.376 [0.182–0.779]; P = 0.008*, OR = 0.401 [0.188–0.857]; P = 0.018*) and B1 (OR = 0.363 [0.179–0.735]; P = 0.005*, OR = 0.389 [0.187–0.808]; P = 0.011*) had opposite influences on CCPR and CLBR compared with groups A4 and B4, whereas groups A3 were weakly but significantly associated with CCPR.

Table 7 Binary logistic regression on CCPR and CLBR with the ratio of serum E2
Full size table

Discussion

The role of E2 in IVF-ET is well known to the stage of the trigger day of hCG injection, and it indicates follicular maturation when estrogen level reaches 250 pg/mL; however, its role before that stage remains controversial. In this study, the serum estrogen levels of Gn1, Gn5, Gn8, and HCG were measured, and their ratio was calculated to evaluate ovarian response and predict treatment outcomes. In the statistical analysis, the estrogen levels of Gn5, Gn8, and HCG, as well as the ratios of Gn5/Gn1, Gn8/Gn5, and HCG/Gn1, all had clinical guiding significance, and the low growth level and ratio significantly reduced CCPR and CLBR. The increment coefficient of estrogen was observed at different stages of IVF-ET, and it was discovered that during Gn stimulation, the change in estrogen in the early and middle stages was also associated with pregnancy outcome, which may be linked to the follicle growth mode. During the early follicular stage, a group of antral follicles is recruited and induced to develop. The collected follicular fluid had low estrogen levels. At this point, estrogen growth may be linked to recruited follicles. As the follicle grows, follicular granulosa cells increase in number and exhibit aromatase activity [35]. Therefore, follicular fluid contains high levels of estrogen. At this stage, the increase in estrogen levels may be related to follicular quality.

Second, no study has explored the relationship between the ratio of E2 increase during Gn treatment and prognosis with an antagonist regimen. According to Table 2, we revealed that serum E2 ratios of groups A (Gn5/Gn1) and B (Gn8/Gn5) were statistically significant compared with pregnancy outcomes. Therefore, we chose these two indicators for further analysis and grouping according to the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles. The Chi-square test and constructing a binary logistic regression analysis model aimed at pregnancy outcomes revealed that patients with lower serum E2 ratios in groups A1 and B1 had lower CCPR and CLBR, and group B had more significance. It is suggested that, in clinical medication, estrogen levels can be observed after five days of Gn treatment, and medication can be adjusted when the increase in estrogen is not ideal to obtain satisfactory efficacy.

Third, we analyzed the factors influencing the E2 ratio during the Gn stimulation cycle. According to the statistical analysis, the increase in estrogen levels during the middle stage of Gn stimulation (Gn8/Gn5, group B) was associated with age, infertility years, and BMI but not with the increase in estrogen levels during the early stage of Gn stimulation (Gn5/Gn1, group A). These results imply that the basic characteristics of patients greatly affect the rate of estrogen increase during the Gn8/Gn5 stage and may be a key factor affecting follicle quality. In follicular growth, a higher ratio of estrogen increase can result in higher clinical pregnancies and live births, regardless of whether they are in groups A or B. However, the link between groups A and B was the opposite. The estrogen ratio in group B decreased as the ratio in group A increased. Estrogen growth was fastest in the early stage and slowest in the middle stage in the corresponding patients. An insufficient increase in estrogen levels in patients who recruit more follicles in the early stage could be due to an insufficient dose of Gn. When the association between group A and Gn usage was examined, it was discovered that the longer the Gn days and the higher the dose of Gn, the slower the early-stage estrogen increase. This may be related to the patient’s baseline conditions. Typically, patients with a high BMI, age, or more antral follicles receive a higher Gn initiation dosage, although a lower estrogen growth rate is generally obtained. In contrast, in the group B study, the longer the Gn days and the larger the required dosage of Gn, the faster estrogen growth in the middle stage. This may indicate the regularity of Gn dosage in follicular development process, and the dosage of Gn8/Gn5 is more critical at this stage, and it is also the time to increase Gn dosage in a clinical setting.

Fourth, the main purpose of monitoring estrogen in IVF-ET is to assess the availability of adequate quantity and quality of mature oocytes on the trigger day. This study revealed that estrogen ratios increased during early and middle ovulation induction (Gn5/Gn1, Gn8/Gn5), as well as estrogen levels on hCG day (HCG), were significant for IVF-ET outcome. However, the ratio of estrogen increase was not significantly different in the late stages of Gn-stimulated follicular growth (HCG/Gn5 and HCG/Gn8). Tan et al. [36] discovered no statistically significant differences in pregnancy rates among three groups of patients who respectively received hCG on the day of the leading follicle reaching 18 mm, on the second day, and the third day. At the moment of follicular maturation, estrogen concentration may be more important than estrogen growth ratio, necessitating a rethink of the role of estrogen in trigger day selection.

Predicting outcomes in ART may allow for earlier treatment strategy adjustment and protect patients from unnecessary physical and financial burdens throughout the treatment cycle. It is currently being monitored using recurrent transvaginal ultrasonography or serum E2. We considered that ultrasound could measure follicle growth, whereas serum E2 levels mainly reflected follicle function. As a result, estradiol plays a critical role despite its relatively low predictive value as a single factor. Additional parameters are required to identify more sensitive biochemical markers that may predict the probability of achieving clinical pregnancy before hCG administration. Our study demonstrated that accurate monitoring of E2 ratios is a key aspect that supports the prognosis of IVF-ET outcomes, dose adjustment, and cycle cancellation evaluation. This provides the clinic with a new, simple, and convenient predictive method. By observing and calculating the range of E2 increase ratio, we found that both Gn5/Gn1 and Gn8/Gn5 could predict IVF outcome success, but Gn8/Gn5 was more accurate. Maintaining a serum estradiol increase ratio above 6.44 on Gn5/Gn1 and 2.39 on Gn8/Gn5 may result in a higher pregnancy rate.

The main limitation of our study was related to the sample size. It was difficult to recover all the necessary data for calculating the estradiol increase ratios throughout the stimulation treatment. Therefore, we excluded patients with insufficient information and those who had achieved pregnancy but had not yet given birth. Furthermore, we need to evaluate whether using different stimulation gonadotropin doses will lead to a deviation in our results in a single center.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

hCG:

Human chronic gonadotropin

IVF-ET:

In vitro fertilization-embryo transfer

Gn:

Gonadotropin

ART:

Assisted reproductive technology

E2 :

Estradiol

BMI:

Body mass index

Gn days:

Gonadotropin days

Gn dosage:

Gonadotropin dosage

Gn1:

Serum estradiol on the day of gonadotrophin

Gn5:

Serum estradiol on the five days after gonadotropin stimulation

Gn8:

Serum estradiol on the eight days after gonadotropin stimulation

HCG:

Serum estradiol on the trigger day of human chorionic gonadotropin injection

Gn5/Gn1:

The serum estradiol levels of Gn5 divided by Gn1

Gn8/Gn5:

The serum estradiol levels of Gn8 divided by Gn5

HCG/Gn1:

The serum estradiol levels of HCG divided by Gn1

HCG/Gn5:

The serum estradiol levels of HCG divided by Gn5

HCG/Gn8:

The serum estradiol levels of HCG divided by Gn8

CCPR:

Cumulative clinical pregnancy rate

CLBR:

Cumulative live birth rate

References

  1. Castillo JC, Dolz M, Moreno J, Gijon L, Ferrer R, Ferrero E, Bonilla-Musoles F. Triggering with GnRH agonist in oocyte-donation cycles: oestradiol monitoring is not necessary during ovarian stimulation. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012;24(2):247–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ozdegirmenci O, Dilbaz S, Cinar O, Aydin S, Beydilli G, Cakir L, Guven ES, Akyol M, Haberal A. Can serum oestradiol be a predictor of quality of oocytes and embryos, maturation of oocytes and pregnancy rate in ICSI cycles? Gynecol Endocrinol. 2011;27(4):279–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pittaway DE, Wentz AC. Evaluation of the exponential rise of serum estradiol concentrations in human menopausal gonadotropin-induced cycles. Fertil Steril. 1983;40(6):763–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sharara FI, McClamrock HD. High estradiol levels and high oocyte yield are not detrimental to in vitro fertilization outcome. Fertil Steril. 1999;72(3):401–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Simon C, Moreau J, Gatimel N, Cohade C, Parinaud J, Leandri R. Impact of estradiol and progesterone levels during the late follicular stage on the outcome of GnRH antagonist protocols. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2019;35(6):481–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Thomas K, Searle T, Quinn A, Wood S, Lewis-Jones I, Kingsland C. The value of routine estradiol monitoring in assisted conception cycles. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2002;81(6):551–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kwan I, Bhattacharya S, Kang A, Woolner A. Monitoring of stimulated cycles in assisted reproduction (IVF and ICSI). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;2014(8):CD005289.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Srouji SS, Mark A, Levine Z, Betensky RA, Hornstein MD, Ginsburg ES. Predicting in vitro fertilization live birth using stimulation day 6 estradiol, age, and follicle-stimulating hormone. Fertil Steril. 2005;84(3):795–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Miao MF, Huang HF. Dynamic measurements of serum inhibin B and estradiol: a predictive evaluation of ovarian response to gonadotrophin stimulation in the early stage of IVF treatment. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2009;10(1):35–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Jiang Z, Jin L, Shi W, Xi J, Hu Y, Liu X, Sheng J, Ding G, Huang H. A combination of follicle stimulating hormone, estradiol and age is associated with the pregnancy outcome for women undergoing assisted reproduction: a retrospective cohort analysis. Sci China Life Sci. 2019;62(1):112–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wertheimer A, Danieli-Gruber S, Hochberg A, Oron G, Sapir O, Shufaro Y, Ben-Haroush A. The association between treatment parameters on the day of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist initiation during a flexible protocol and oocyte maturation rate. Reprod Biol. 2020;20(2):127–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. P. M: Low and High Responders—At What Levels of Serum Estradiol Do Things Start to Get Fuzzy? Fertility and Sterility 1999, 71(3).

  13. Phelps JY, Levine AS, Hickman TN, Zacur HA, Wallach EE, Hinton EL. Day 4 estradiol levels predict pregnancy success in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for IVF. Fertil Steril. 1998;69(6):1015–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kahyaoglu S, Yumusak OH, Ozgu-Erdinc AS, Yilmaz S, Kahyaoglu I, Engin-Ustun Y, Yilmaz N. Can serum estradiol levels on the fourth day of IVF/ICSI cycle predict outcome in poor responder women? Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2015;61(4):233–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Khalaf Y, Taylor A, Braude P. Low serum estradiol concentrations after five days of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization are associated with poor outcome. Fertil Steril. 2000;74(1):63–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Maghraby HAE, Mahdi M, Arab MSE, Mabrouk M, Ghi T, Farina A. Stimulation day-six serum estradiol: A predictive indicator for the probability of embryo cryopreservation in IVF/ICSI cycles. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research. 2009;35(2):326–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kovacs P, Witt BR. Day 6 estradiol level predicts cycle cancellation among poor responder patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles using a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist flare regimen. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2002;19(7):349–53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Mitwally MF, Bhakoo HS, Crickard K, Sullivan MW, Batt RE, Yeh J. Estradiol production during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation correlates with treatment outcome in women undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2006;86(3):588–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Anifandis G, Koutselini E, Louridas K, Liakopoulos V, Leivaditis K, Mantzavinos T, Sioutopoulou D, Vamvakopoulos N. Estradiol and leptin as conditional prognostic IVF markers. Reproduction. 2005;129(4):531–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Valbuena D, Martin J, de Pablo JL. Remohı́ J, Pellicer A, Simón C: Increasing levels of estradiol are deleterious to embryonic implantation because they directly affect the embryo. Fertil Steril. 2001;76(5):962–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Chang KT, Su YT, Tsai YR, Lan KC, Hsuuw YD, Kang HY, Chan WH, Huang FJ. High levels estradiol affect blastocyst implantation and post-implantation development directly in mice. Biomed J. 2022;45(1):179–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Garcia JE, Acosta AA, Hsiu J-G, Jones HW. Advanced endometrial maturation after ovulation induction with human menopausal gonadotropin/human chorionic gonadotropin for in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1984;41(1):31–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pellicer A, Valbuena D, Cano F, Remohí J, Simón C. Lower implantation rates in high responders: evidence for an altered endocrine milieu during the preimplantation period. Fertil Steril. 1996;65(6):1190–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kolb BA, Paulson RJ. The luteal phase of cycles utilizing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and the possible impact of this hyperstimulation on embryo implantation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;176(6):1262–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Romanski PA, Bortoletto P, Liu YL, Chung PH, Rosenwaks Z. Length of estradiol exposure >100 pg/ml in the follicular phase affects pregnancy outcomes in natural frozen embryo transfer cycles. Hum Reprod. 2021;36(7):1932–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Blazar AS, Hogan JW, Frankfurter D, Hackett R, Keefe DL. Serum estradiol positively predicts outcomes in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2004;81(6):1707–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Zavy MT, Craig LB, Wild RA, Kahn SN, O’Leary D, Hansen KR. In high responding patients undergoing an initial IVF cycle, elevated estradiol on the day of hCG has no effect on live birth rate. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2014;12:119.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Shi Y, Sun Y, Hao C, Zhang H, Wei D, Zhang Y, Zhu Y, Deng X, Qi X, Li H, et al. Transfer of Fresh versus Frozen Embryos in Ovulatory Women. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(2):126–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ramezanali F, Arabipoor A, Hafezi M, Salman-Yazdi R, Zolfaghari Z, Asharfi M. Serum estradiol level on trigger day impacts clinical pregnancy rate in modified natural frozen embryo transfer cycles. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019;145(3):312–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Xu X, Yang A, Han Y, Wang W, Hao G, Cui N. The Association Between Serum Estradiol Levels on hCG Trigger Day and Live Birth Rates in Non-PCOS Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022;13:839773.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Papageorgiou T, Guibert J, Goffinet F, Patrat C, Fulla Y, Janssens Y, Zorn JR. Percentile curves of serum estradiol levels during controlled ovarian stimulation in 905 cycles stimulated with recombinant FSH show that high estradiol is not detrimental to IVF outcome. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(11):2846–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Pena JE, Chang PL, Chan LK, Zeitoun K, Thornton MH 2nd, Sauer MV. Supraphysiological estradiol levels do not affect oocyte and embryo quality in oocyte donation cycles. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(1):83–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Copperman AB, Benadiva C. Optimal usage of the GnRH antagonists: a review of the literature. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2013;11:20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Scott RT, Hofmann GE, Veeck LL, Jones HW, Muasher SJ. Embryo quality and pregnancy rates in patients attempting pregnancy through in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1991;55(2):426–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Chauvin S, Cohen-Tannoudji J, Guigon CJ. Estradiol Signaling at the Heart of Folliculogenesis: Its Potential Deregulation in Human Ovarian Pathologies. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(1):512.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Tan S-L, Balen A, Hussein EE, Mills C, Campbell S, Yovich J, Jacobs HS. A prospective randomized study of the optimum timing of human chorionic gonadotropin administration after pituitary desensitization in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1992;57(6):1259–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We want to thank all the participants in this study, particularly Professor Jian-Wei Zhang, for her assistance with the conception and design.

Funding

This study was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (Grant No. ZR2020MH363).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated Hospital. Jinan, Shandong, China

    Chun-Xiao Wei, Liang Zhang, Cong-Hui Pang & Ying-Hua Qi

  2. Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Jinan, Shandong, China

    Jian-Wei Zhang

Authors
  1. Chun-Xiao Wei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Liang Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Cong-Hui Pang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ying-Hua Qi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jian-Wei Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Jian-Wei Zhang contributed to the conception, design, and review of the manuscript. Chun-Xiao Wei contributed to the conception and design, analysis and interpretation of the data, and manuscript drafting. Liang Zhang and Ying-Hua Qi played a role in interpreting the data and drafting the manuscript, and Cong-Hui Pang played a role in the analysis and interpretation of the data. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jian-Wei Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects. This study was conducted following the Declaration of Helsinki. This retrospective study was registered with the Reproductive Ethics Committees of the Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of TCM (ref approval no. SDTCM20210720) on July 21, 2021. The name of the IRB is the Reproductive Ethics Committees of the Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of traditional Chinese medicine.

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Jian-Wei Zhang graduated from Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine in China in 2006 with an M.D. degree. From 1993 up to now, she worked for reproductive and genetic center of integrated medicine in Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated Hospital as a certified specialist in reproductive medicine and served as Vice-Director.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wei, CX., Zhang, L., Pang, CH. et al. Effect of the ratios of estradiol increase on the outcome of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer with antagonist regimens: a single center retrospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 23, 134 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05438-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05438-3

Keywords

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

ISSN: 1471-2393

Contact us