Skip to main content

Low prevalence of high blood pressure in pregnant women in Burkina Faso: a cross-sectional study



High blood pressure (HBP) during pregnancy causes maternal and fetal mortality. Studies regarding its prevalence and associated factors in frontline level health care settings are scarce. We thus aimed to evaluate the prevalence of HBP and its associated factors among pregnant women at the first level of the health care system in Burkina Faso.


This cross-sectional study was conducted in six health facilities between December 2018 and March 2019. HBP was defined as systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with HBP.


A total of 1027 pregnant women were included. The overall prevalence of HBP was 1.4% (14/1027; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.7–2.3), with 1.6% (7/590; 95% CI 0.8–3.3) in rural and 1.2% (7/437; 95% CI 0.6- 2.5) in semi-urban areas. The prevalence was 0.7% (3/440; 95% CI 0.2–2.1) among women in the first, 1.5% (7/452; 95% CI 0.7–3.2) in the second and 3% (4/135; 95% CI 1.1–7.7) in the third trimester. In the multivariable analysis, pregnancy trimester, maternal age, household income, occupation, parity, and residential area were not associated with HBP during pregnancy.


The prevalence of HBP among pregnant women at the first level of health system care is significantly lower compared to prevalence’s from hospital studies. Public health surveillance, primary prevention activities, early screening, and treatment of HDP should be reinforced in all health facilities to reduce the burden of adverse pregnancy outcomes in Burkina Faso.

Peer Review reports


Maternal mortality is unacceptably high. Worldwide, approximately 295,000 women died during pregnancy, childbirth and the postpartum period in 2017 [1]. Every day, approximately 810 women die from preventable causes related to pregnancy and childbirth [1].

The vast majority of these deaths (94%) occur in low-resource settings and most could have been prevented [1]. Numerous factors, such as hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), have been identified as being responsible for this mortality [2,3,4,5]. According to a recent report from the World Health Organization (WHO), HDP is the leading cause of maternal mortality in some African settings [3]. HDP is a multisystem disorder that includes gestational hypertension, chronic hypertension with superimposed pre-eclampsia and pre-eclampsia. HDP contribute to 14% of maternal mortality worldwide and 16% in sub-Saharan Africa [3, 4]. Globally, 2.7% of pregnant women suffer from HDP, whereas the incidence of chronic hypertension is 0.29%; the prevalence of HDP is 2.16% in pre-eclampsia and 0.28% in eclampsia [6]. Many studies have investigated the prevalence of high blood pressure (HBP) in pregnant women, with most studies being conducted in tertiary hospitals [7,8,9]. Very different prevalence of HDP has been reported, ranging from 1.3% in China to 26.7% in Tanzania [10, 11]; in 2022, a prevalence of 0.3% in women of childbearing age was reported in sub-Saharan Africa [12]. Few studies, however, have investigated HBP prevalence at the healthcare system level; furthermore, no studies have been conducted in Burkina Faso.

The primary goal of WHO recommendations is to improve the quality of care and outcomes for pregnant women, particularly related with the management of HDP [13, 14]. Women with HDP should have a comprehensive care plan that includes prenatal counselling, frequent visits during pregnancy, timely birth, appropriate intrapartum monitoring and care and postpartum follow-up. Management involves advice during each stage of pregnancy to ensure that the woman is aware of the risks to herself and her fetus [13, 15]. In an era where data govern health priorities, evaluation of the prevalence of HBP in particular settings has important implications for surveillance [16, 17]. This study was conducted to determine the prevalence of HBP among pregnant women at the first level of the healthcare system in Burkina Faso and to investigate associated risk factors.


Study design and population

This cross-sectional study was conducted between December 2018 and March 2019. The study population comprised pregnant women attending antenatal care (ANC) in the three largest semi-urban health facilities of Kaya town (the medical centers of sectors 1, 6 and 7) and the three largest rural health facilities around Kaya town (Boussouma, Pissila and Korsimoro) (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Study area

Eligibility criteria

Eligible participants were recruited consecutively in each health facility. All women receiving ANC, regardless of the stage of pregnancy, were included after providing informed consent.

Calculation of sample size

There are wide ranges in the prevalence of HBP during pregnancy and we did not deem any of these as being representative for our study setting [4]. We considered the prevalence of 9.6% of HBP in the teaching hospital of Yalgado, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso and a non-response rate of 10% with a type one error set at 5% with graph effect [18]. The minimum sample size was 880 participants.

Data collection

The women were invited to face-to-face interviews after identification and signing of consent. Clinical data regarding ANC were retrieved from women’s health booklets and from the antenatal clinic's register in the health facilities. A structured questionnaire was used to collect data. Six health workers with experience in data collection and speaking a local language conducted face-to-face interviews to obtain demographic characteristics; also, blood pressure was measured at the end of the interview, after approximately 15 min of rest.

An electronic blood pressure monitor (Omron M3 Intellisense device) with an adult-sized cuff was used to measure blood pressure with the participant in a sitting position. The initial blood pressure was measured in each arm to determine the arm with the highest blood pressure. Two other measurements were successively performed on the retained arm with an interval of one minute between each measurement. Average of the last two measurements was considered as the participant's blood pressure.

Data quality assurance

All health workers were trained by the research team to use the tools for various data collection techniques. A pre-test was conducted in a health center that did not participate in the study. A manual containing all interview and measurement procedures was given to each interviewer.

Statistical analysis

HBP was defined as systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg [19]. The score of a household’s socioeconomic status was computed based on 20 items using principal component analysis. These 20 items included the presence of a bucket, bowls, cup, gas fireplace, bed, mattress, table, chair, functional radio, functional clock, functional lamp, functional television, functional bicycle, functional motorcycle, functional telephone, functional cart, functional wheelbarrow, donkey, horse, poultry, sheep and goats.

The variables used for this study were recorded as follows: age (< 19 years, 20–29 years and ≥ 30 years), age at first pregnancy (13–19 years and 20–36 years), education level (none, primary and secondary, higher), level of wealth (poor, medium, rich), occupation (employed and not employed), pregnancy trimester (first trimester, second trimester and third trimester), parity (one or more than one) and place of residence (rural and semi-urban). We used a multivariable logistic regression model (maternal age, household income, occupation, pregnancy trimester, parity and residential area) to determine the factors associated with the presence of HBP. All statistical analyses were performed using Stata V.14.1 (Stata 2014: Revision 01 dec 2015. 147 College Station, Texas, USA) [20].


Among the six health facilities, 1027 women received antenatal care and all agreed to participate. Mean age of the participants was 25.8 ± 6.0 years and of them, 14.4% (148/1027) were < 20 years, out of whom 17.4% (76/437) lived in semi-urban areas, and 12.2% (72/590) in rural areas. Most participants were younger than 20 years in the first pregnancy 71.8% (732/1027) and had not received formal education (63.3%; 650/1027) (Table 1).

Table 1 Characteristics of study participants

The overall prevalence of HBP was 1.4% (14/1027; 95% CI 0.7–2.3). Prevalence rates for each group were as follows: in the group aged 20–29 years (1.4%; 95% CI 0.7–2.7), without formal education (1.7%; 95%CI 0.9–3.0), in low income households (1.7%; 95% CI 0.8–3.9), without occupation (1.5%; 95% CI 0.8–2.8), in the third trimester (3.0%; 95% CI 1.1–7.7), primipara (1.6%; 95% CI 0.8–3.2), and living in rural areas(1.6%; 95% CI 0.8–3.3). These differences were, however, not statistically significant (Table 2).

Table 2 Prevalence of high blood pressure among pregnant women

In the multivariable analysis, pregnancy trimester, maternal age, household income, occupation, parity, and residential area were not associated with HBP during pregnancy (Table 3).

Table 3 Logistic regression result of High blood pressure and associated factors among pregnant women


The prevalence of HBP in pregnancy was low with 1.4% in Burkina Faso, similar to that reported in African (1.5%) and global studies (0.2%–9.2%) [20, 21]. In 2020, Gemechu et al. reported a prevalence of 0.9% (95% CI: 0.4–1.8) for only gestational hypertension in a systematic review and meta-analysis of 70 studies [4]. The prevalence found in our study is relatively high compared to the prevalence of 0.3% for women of childbearing age reported by Jiang et al. in 2022 [12]. However, large differences have been reported in the prevalence of HBP [8, 20, 20, 22,23,24]. Berhe et al., reported a range of 8–46.4% in the prevalence of HBP in a systematic review of 258,602 pregnant women [25]. These differences could be explained by the participants’ age. A survey of HBP in China showed a prevalence of 12.7% in pregnant women aged ≥ 40 years compared to a prevalence of 4.3% in pregnant women aged 25–29 years [26]. HBP measurement methods have not been described in all studies therefore different methods may partially explain the differences in prevalence [4, 25]. In addition, differences might be due to sociocultural variability in maternal risk factors and differences in antenatal care accessibility [4].

Most prevalence studies, however, were conducted in referral hospitals and in urban settings where women with hypertension are concentrated for better management [7, 8, 11, 20, 23]. In Togo, the prevalence of hypertension was 12.5% in in a maternity department in an urban area [22]. In Burkina Faso, in the teaching hospital of an urban area, a prevalence of 9.6% was reported [18]. This is similar to the prevalence of 9.9% reported in a health facility in Ethiopia and 9.7% in a Nigerian teaching hospital [24, 25]. Our study was conducted at a first-level health facility. In our sample, more than 76% of the participants were < 30 years of age. Their young age and rural residential environment could explain the observed low prevalence. HBP may be more common in women aged > 35 years, although a high prevalence in women < 30 years of age has been reported in China and Ethiopia [25, 26].

Higher prevalence of hypertension among women in the third trimester of pregnancy (3%) than in the first trimester (0.7%) can be explained by the development of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy after 20 weeks [7]. Differences in prevalence rates in the literature also depend on the stage of pregnancy blood pressure measurement was done, considering the mid-pregnancy blood pressure drop occurring in uncomplicated pregnancies and the level of screening before pregnancy in different countries [27,28,29].

Maternal age, household income, occupation, parity, and residential area were not associated with HBP during pregnancy in our study. Several studies have reported an association between sociodemographic characteristics [12, 20, 25]. This difference may be explained by the lack of statistical power because we conducted this study to identify the prevalence of HBP during pregnancy [30].

Study strengths and limitations

This study is the first to assess the prevalence of HBP in the first-level health care system in Burkina Faso. The measurements were performed in a private room after the ANC visit. We took three blood pressure measurements and the average of the last two measurements was considered as the woman's blood pressure. Postpartum pre-eclampsia could not be observed owing to the design of our study. The study lacked statistical power to show statistically significant effects.


The prevalence of HBP among pregnancy women in the first level of health system care is significantly lower compared to prevalence’s reported in hospital studies. Pregnant women in resource-limited countries face a double burden due to maternal infections and common pathologies such as the hypertensive disorders that compromise perinatal and maternal outcomes of pregnancy. Public health surveillance, primary prevention activities, early screening, and treatment of HDP should be reinforced in all health facilities to reduce the burden of adverse pregnancy outcomes in Burkina Faso.

Availability of data and materials

Data sets are available from the corresponding author.



Antenatal Care


High Blood Pressure


Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy


Confidence Interval


Adjusted Odds Ratio


Crude Odds Ratio


Millimeter of mercury


World Health Organization


  1. World Health Organization. Trends in maternal mortality 2000 to 2017: estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division. Geneva: WHO; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Noubiap JJ, Bigna JJ, Nyaga UF, Jingi AM, Kaze AD, Nansseu JR, et al. The burden of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2019;21:479–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Say L, Chou D, Gemmill A, Tunçalp Ö, Moller A-B, Daniels J, et al. Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2014;2:e323–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gemechu KS, Assefa N, Mengistie B. Prevalence of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Womens Health (Lond Engl). 2020;16:1745506520973105.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Berg CJ, Callaghan WM, Syverson C, Henderson Z. Pregnancy-related mortality in the United States, 1998 to 2005. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116:1302–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Abalos E, Cuesta C, Carroli G, Qureshi Z, Widmer M, Vogel JP, et al. Pre-eclampsia, eclampsia and adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes: a secondary analysis of the World Health Organization Multicountry Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health. BJOG. 2014;121(Suppl 1):14–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Singh S, Ahmed EB, Egondu SC, Ikechukwu NE. Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy among pregnant women in a Nigerian Teaching Hospital. Niger Med J. 2014;55:384–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Walle TA, Azagew AW. Hypertensive disorder of pregnancy prevalence and associated factors among pregnant women attending ante natal care at Gondar town health Institutions, North West Ethiopia 2017. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2019;16:79–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Muti M, Tshimanga M, Notion GT, Bangure D, Chonzi P. Prevalence of pregnancy induced hypertension and pregnancy outcomes among women seeking maternity services in Harare. Zimbabwe BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2015;15:111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Xiong T, Mu Y, Liang J, Zhu J, Li X, Li J, et al. Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy and stillbirth rates: a facility-based study in China. Bull World Health Organ. 2018;96:531–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Larson E, Rabkin M, Mbaruku GM, Mbatia R, Kruk ME. Missed opportunities to improve the health of postpartum women: high rates of untreated hypertension in rural Tanzania. Matern Child Health J. 2017;21:407–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jiang L, Tang K, Magee LA, von Dadelszen P, Ekeroma A, Li X, et al. A global view of hypertensive disorders and diabetes mellitus during pregnancy. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. World Health Organization. WHO recommendations on drug treatment for non-severe hypertension in pregnancy. World Health Organization; 2020.

  14. World Health Organization. WHO recommendations: drug treatment for severe hypertension in pregnancy. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tunçalp Ӧ, Were W, MacLennan C, Oladapo O, Gülmezoglu A, Bahl R, et al. Quality of care for pregnant women and newborns—the WHO vision. BJOG. 2015;122:1045–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tu K, Chen Z, Lipscombe LL, Canadian Hypertension Education Program Outcomes Research Taskforce. to 2005: a population-based study. CMAJ. 1995;2008(178):1429–35.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bramham K, Parnell B, Nelson-Piercy C, Seed PT, Poston L, Chappell LC. Chronic hypertension and pregnancy outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2014;348:g2301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Georges MR. Hypertension in Pregnancy at the Teaching Hospital of Yalgado Ouédraogo, Burkina Faso. J Hypertens. 2015;04.

  19. Armstrong C. JNC8 Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension in Adults. AFP. 2014;90:503–4.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Umesawa M, Kobashi G. Epidemiology of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy: prevalence, risk factors, predictors and prognosis. Hypertens Res. 2017;40:213–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Noubiap JJ, Bigna JJ, Nyaga UF, Jingi AM, Kaze AD, Nansseu JR, et al. The burden of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2019.

  22. Baragou S, Goeh-Akue E, Pio M, Afassinou YM, Atta B. Hypertension and pregnancy in Lome (sub-Saharan Africa): epidemiology, diagnosis and risk factors. Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 2014;63:145–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Johnson KM, Zash R, Haviland MJ, Hacker MR, Luckett R, Diseko M, et al. Hypertensive disease in pregnancy in Botswana: Prevalence and impact on perinatal outcomes. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2016;6:418–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mersha AG, Abegaz TM, Seid MA. Maternal and perinatal outcomes of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in Ethiopia: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19:458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Berhe AK, Kassa GM, Fekadu GA, Muche AA. Prevalence of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in Ethiopia: a systemic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18:34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ye C, Ruan Y, Zou L, Li G, Li C, Chen Y, et al. The 2011 survey on hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) in China: prevalence, risk factors, complications, pregnancy and perinatal outcomes. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e100180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Seyom E, Abera M, Tesfaye M, Fentahun N. Maternal and fetal outcome of pregnancy related hypertension in Mettu Karl Referral Hospital. Ethiopia J Ovarian Res. 2015;8:10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Soma-Pillay P, Catherine N-P, Tolppanen H, Mebazaa A, Tolppanen H, Mebazaa A. Physiological changes in pregnancy. Cardiovasc J Afr. 2016;27:89–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kohlhepp LM, Hollerich G, Vo L, Hofmann-Kiefer K, Rehm M, Louwen F, et al. [Physiological changes during pregnancy]. Anaesthesist. 2018;67:383–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Carneiro CFD, Moulin TC, Macleod MR, Amaral OB. Effect size and statistical power in the rodent fear conditioning literature - A systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0196258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We wish to acknowledge the workers who collected the data, and the women and health workers.


The study was funded by the Académie de Recherche et d’Enseignement Supérieur (ARES) as part of the Research for Development Projects. However, the funding agency did not play any role in the study design, data collection, data interpretation, or writing or submission of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



FG, FKS, JMD, and SK were involved in the study design. FG and AB participated in the data collection. FG, FK, SS, AB, TM, BB, and SK participated in the analyses. FG prepared the first project. FG, FKS, JMD, SS, AB, TM, BB, and SK revised different versions of the manuscript. FG, FKS, JMD, SS, AB, TM, BB, and SK reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Franck Garanet.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The protocol was approved by the Burkina Faso Ethics Committee for Health Research (approval number: 2018–12-146). Ethical considerations including women’s confidentiality, privacy, and voluntary participation were respected.

Informed consent was obtained before participating in the study. This included information on the data collection process, ability to always withdraw, risks (which there were not), and information on hypertension during pregnancy. In addition, those diagnosed with high blood pressure were referred to healthcare workers for adequate management.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Garanet, F., Samadoulougou, S., Baguiya, A. et al. Low prevalence of high blood pressure in pregnant women in Burkina Faso: a cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 22, 955 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: