Skip to main content
Download PDF

Association between previous spontaneous abortion and preeclampsia: a case–control study

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth volume 22, Article number: 715 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The association between previous spontaneous abortion and preeclampsia is not yet fully understood. The current study was conducted to assess the association between previous spontaneous abortion and preeclampsia among pregnant women in Sudan.

Methods

A case–control study (involving 180 women in each study group) was conducted at Saad Abuelela Hospital, Khartoum, Sudan. The cases were pregnant women with preeclampsia, while the control group included healthy pregnant women. The participants’ sociodemographic, obstetric, and clinical characteristics were assessed via a questionnaire.

Results

There was no significant difference in the age, parity, education level, employment status, blood group, body mass index, and hemoglobin level between the patient and control groups. Forty (22.2%) women with preeclampsia and 68 (37.8%) women in the control group had a history of spontaneous abortion (p = 0.001).

Multivariate logistic regression analysis (adjusted) revealed that women with a history of spontaneous abortion had a lower risk of preeclampsia than those without a history of spontaneous abortion [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 0.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.26‒0.73]. However, women with a history of preeclampsia had a higher risk of recurrence of preeclampsia (AOR = 1.92, 95% CI = 1.11‒3.32).

Conclusion

The present study revealed that previous spontaneous abortion reduced the risk of preeclampsia by 59.0%.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Preeclampsia is a multi-pathway disorder that is characterized by new-onset hypertension and proteinuria in the second half of pregnancy (i.e., after the 20th week of gestation); it is one of the most common pregnancy-related disorders [1]. Preeclampsia is a global health challenge, affecting 2%–8% of pregnant or parturient women. It can have maternal and perinatal adverse effects and is the leading cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality [2]. Despite advances in various sciences to understand the pathophysiology of preeclampsia, its exact cause and etiology remain unclear. Previous research has revealed several sociodemographic, obstetric, clinical, biochemical, and genetic factors associated with preeclampsia [3]. We previously found that preeclampsia/eclampsia was responsible for 4.2% of the admissions (total admissions = 4689) to a maternity hospital in Kassala in eastern Sudan and that preeclampsia was the main cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality [4].

Several studies have reported an association between prior abortion and preeclampsia [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. However, the results of these studies are inconsistent; while some studies have reported an increased risk of preeclampsia in women with a history of abortions [5,6,7,8], others have reported no such effect [9,10,11,12] or a reduced risk of preeclampsia in women with a history of abortions [13,14,15,16]. Moreover, most these studies have been conducted in high-income countries [7, 9, 13, 16]. There is a scarcity of data on the history of abortion and preeclampsia in sub-Saharan African countries [6], and none of these studies have been conducted in Sudan. The risk factors for preeclampsia may differ in different populations. It is therefore necessary to assess these risk factors in different populations. It is important for clinicians, researchers, and health planners to identify the risk factors (including history of spontaneous abortion) for preeclampsia in various settings in order to identify women who are at a higher risk of preeclampsia and to provide optimum care.

The present study aimed to assess the association between previous spontaneous abortion and preeclampsia among pregnant women in Sudan.

Methods

Study design and setting

The present case–control study was conducted at Saad Abuelela Hospital, Khartoum, Sudan, from February to December 2020.

Selection of the participants

The patient group included consecutive pregnant women who presented with preeclampsia during the aforementioned period. Preeclampsia was defined as follows, according to the criteria of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists [1]: (1) average blood pressure levels ≥ 140/90 mmHg on two readings taken at least 6 h apart and (2) proteinuria ≥ 300 mg/24 h in pregnant women. Preeclampsia was considered to be severe in women with average blood pressure levels ≥ 160/110 mmHg on two occasions or proteinuria ≥ 5 g/24 h, in addition to hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count (HAELLP) syndrome; in all other cases, preeclampsia was considered to be mild [1]. Moreover, preeclampsia that developed before and after 34 weeks of gestation was defined as early-onset and late-onset preeclampsia, respectively [17]. A healthy pregnant woman (consecutively to each woman with preeclampsia) without any systemic disease, such as hypertension, thyroid disease, severe anemia (hemoglobin level < 5 g/dl), diabetes mellites, renal disease, or proteinuria, served as a control for each patient with preeclampsia. Women with multiple pregnancies, who were smokers, or whose fetuses had major congenital anomalies were excluded from both the cases and controls.

After the participants signed an informed consent form, they were asked about their sociodemographic, obstetric, and clinical characteristics (such as age, parity, education level, employment status, blood group, history of abortion, history of preeclampsia, and gender of the newborn). The participants’ weight and height were measured using standard procedures to compute the body mass index (BMI) [18]. The hemoglobin level was measured using an automated hematology analyzer, according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Sysmex, KX-21, Japan).

Sample size

A total of 180 women were included in each study group (a ratio of 1:1); the sample size was calculated on the basis of previous data on the history (43.0%) of spontaneous abortions among women with preeclampsia in neighboring Ethiopia [6]. Therefore, we assumed that 40.0% of women with a history of spontaneous abortion would have preeclampsia and 25.0% of women with a history of spontaneous abortion would not have preeclampsia. This sample size (180 in each study group) was used to achieve 80% power and 5% precision; it was assumed that 10% of the women would not respond or would have incomplete data.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences® (SPSS®; IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 22.0; SPSS Inc., New York, United States). The proportions of the studied variables are expressed as frequencies (%). The normality of continuous data was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Multicollinearity (variance inflation factor < 4) was assessed but was not detected among the variables. Associations between specific variables, such as age, parity, education level, employment status, blood group, history of preeclampsia, history of miscarriage, BMI, gender of the newborn, and preeclampsia, were assessed using univariate analysis. Variables with a p-value ≤ 0.200 in univariate analysis were selected for the construction of multivariate models that considered crude associations between preeclampsia and the variables. Backward elimination (likelihood ratio) was used to adjust the model for covariates. Adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. A two-sided p-value ≤ 0.050 was considered to denote statistical significance.

Results

During the study period, 117 (65.0%) and 63 (35.0%) women presented with mild and severe preeclampsia, respectively. There was no significant difference in the age, parity, education level, employment status, blood group, BMI, hemoglobin level, and gender of the newborn between the patient and control groups (n = 180 in each). The number of women with a history of spontaneous abortion was lesser in the patient group than in the control group. Forty (22.2%) women with preeclampsia and 68 (37.8%) women in the control group had a history of spontaneous abortion (p = 0.001). A higher number of women with preeclampsia had a history of preeclampsia (Table 1).

Table 1 Univariate analysis of sociodemographic and clinical variables among women with preeclampsia and controls at Saad Abuelela Hospital, Khartoum, Sudan, in 2020
Full size table

Multivariate logistic regression analysis (adjusted) revealed that women with a history of spontaneous abortion had a lower risk of preeclampsia than those without a history of spontaneous abortion (AOR = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.26‒0.73, p < 0.001). However, women with a history of preeclampsia had a higher risk of recurrence of preeclampsia (AOR = 1.92, 95% CI = 1.11‒3.32, p = 0.022, Table 2).

Table 2 Multivariate analysis of the adjusted odds ratios for the factors associated with preeclampsia at Saad Abuelela Hospital, Khartoum, Sudan, in 2020
Full size table

Discussion

The present study revealed that a history of spontaneous abortion reduced the risk of preeclampsia by 59.0% (AOR = 0.41). This finding is in accordance with that of Lao et al., who reported that prior abortion reduced the risk of preeclampsia by 15.0% among primiparous women in China (adjusted relative risk = 0.85) [14]. Similarly, Su et al. reported that a history of induced abortion was associated with a lower risk of preeclampsia among nulliparous women in China [15]. Moreover, as per a report in Norway, although two or more induced abortions reduced the risk of preeclampsia by 64.0%, one induced abortion marginally/moderately reduced the risk of preeclampsia (95% CI = 0.69–1.02] [16]. In the United States of America (Boston), Parker et al. observed a 10% reduction in the risk of preeclampsia (OR = 0.9) in women with a history of one induced abortion and a 30% reduction (OR = 0.7) in women with a history of three or more induced abortions [13]. Women with a history of abortion have already experienced changes (hormone levels as well as immunological) in their pregnancy in comparison with primiparous women. The previous experienced changes in hormonal and immunological environment can lead to immune tolerance/adaptation and reduce the risk for preeclampsia [19, 20].

However, several studies have reported an association between prior abortion and an increased risk of preeclampsia in Ethiopia [6], Iran [5], China [8], and Scotland [21]. Interestingly, while one prior miscarriage was not found to be associated with preeclampsia, two or more miscarriages were found to be associated with increased risks of preeclampsia [7]. On the other hand, Holmlund et al. found no association between induced abortion and preeclampsia in Finland [9]. Moreover, Clark et al. reported no association between miscarriage and gestational hypertension, even in women with more than two abortions [10]. In a case–control study involving 200 cases and 100 controls, no significant difference was noted in preeclampsia/eclampsia between women with one prior abortion and those with one prior live birth [11]. Interestingly, no reduction in the prevalence of preeclampsia was noted following prior induced or spontaneous abortions [12].

It is worth mentioning that our results should be cautiously compared with those of previous studies. First, while most of these studies assessed the association between induced abortion and preeclampsia, we assessed the association between spontaneous abortion and preeclampsia. Perhaps, spontaneous and induced abortions are two different entities with different pathophysiologies. Because of traditional and religious factors, induced abortion is not practiced in Sudan, with few exceptions for medical reasons. Second, the present study was designed to assess the association between spontaneous abortion and preeclampsia, regardless of the number of miscarriages; however, in several other studies, the association between prior abortion and preeclampsia depended on the number of prior abortions. Third, we need to consider the differences in social and genetic factors among different communities, which may affect the etiology and pathophysiology of preeclampsia in the communities.

In previous studies, prior miscarriages were found to be associated with an increased risk of poor maternal and perinatal outcomes, such as placental dysfunction disorders, stillbirth, small-for-gestational-age fetuses, antepartum hemorrhage, preterm birth, and low birth weight [7, 22]. The association between prior abortion and increased risk of preeclampsia (contrary/opposite to our results) could be explained by the hypothesis that placental dysfunction could result in early placentation failure, with poor implantation and placentation, which are common features of both abortion and preeclampsia [23, 24]. Moreover, prior abortion may lead to maternal exposure to fetal cells and may induce maternal immune tolerance, which may play an important role in the development of preeclampsia [25].

There are many limitations in this study. Many factors, such as communicable diseases (e.g., herpes simplex virus type 2 infection and toxoplasmosis), were not assessed in the present study. These diseases have been reported to be associated with preeclampsia [26, 27], and they may be associated with abortion itself. We objectively assessed the history of spontaneous abortion in women with preeclampsia. The information regarding abortion and its history may not be accurate, as it depends on recall bias.

Conclusion

The present study revealed that previous spontaneous abortion reduced the risk of preeclampsia by 59.0%.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available (because the manuscript is still under the peer review process) but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Obstetric Practice. ACOG practice bulletin. Diagnosis and management of preeclampsia and eclampsia. Number 33, January 2002. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2002;77(1):67–75.

  2. Abalos E, Cuesta C, Grosso AL, Chou D, Say L. Global and regional estimates of preeclampsia and eclampsia: a systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;170:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.05.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Meazaw MW, Chojenta C, Muluneh MD, Loxton D. Systematic and meta-analysis of factors associated with preeclampsia and eclampsia in sub-Saharan Africa. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0237600. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237600.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Ali AA, Okud A, Khojali A, Adam I. High incidence of obstetric complications in Kassala Hospital, Eastern Sudan. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;32:148–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sepidarkish M, Almasi-Hashiani A, Maroufizadeh S, Vesali S, Pirjani R, Samani RO. Association between previous spontaneous abortion and pre-eclampsia during a subsequent pregnancy. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2016;136:83–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yemane A, Teka H, Ahmed S, Temesgen H, Langen E. Gestational hypertension and progression towards preeclampsia in Northern Ethiopia: prospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21:261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gunnarsdottir J, Stephansson O, Cnattingius S, Åkerud H, Wikström AK. Risk of placental dysfunction disorders after prior miscarriages: A population-based study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;211:34.e1-34.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.01.041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yang J, Wang Y, Wang XY, Zhao YY, Wang J, Zhao YY. Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes of Patients with History of First-Trimester Recurrent Spontaneous Abortion. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:4359424. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4359424.

  9. Holmlund S, Kauko T, Matomäki J, Tuominen M, Mäkinen J, Rautava P. Induced abortion - impact on a subsequent pregnancy in first-time mothers: A registry-based study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16:325. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-1109-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Clark K, Barton JR, Istwan N, Rhea D, Desch C, Sibai A, Sibai BM. PP179. The influence of prior abortion on rates of gestational hypertension/pre-eclampsia and spontaneous preterm delivery in nulliparous women. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2012;2(3):337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2012.04.290.

  11. Kashanian M, Akbarian AR, Baradaran H, Shabandoust SH. Pregnancy outcome following a previous spontaneous abortion (miscarriage). Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2006;61:167–70. https://doi.org/10.1159/000091074.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hiersch L, Ashwal E, Aviram A, Rayman S, Wiznitzer A, Yogev Y. The association between previous single first trimester abortion and pregnancy outcome in nulliparous women. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015;29:1457–61. https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2015.1051022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Parker SE, Gissler M, Ananth CV, Werler MM. Induced Abortions and the Risk of Preeclampsia among Nulliparous Women. Am J Epidemiol. 2014;182:663–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lao TT, Hui ASY, Law LW, Sahota DS. Prior abortion history and pregnancy hypertensive disorders in primiparous gravidae. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2018;14:168–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2018.10.001.

  15. Su Y, Xie X, Zhou Y, Lin H, Li Y, Feng N, Luo J. Association of induced abortion with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy risk among nulliparous women in China: a prospective cohort study. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):5128. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61827-0.

  16. Trogstad L, Magnus P, Skjærven R, Stoltenberg C. Previous abortions and risk of pre-eclampsia. Int J Epidemiol. 2008;37:1333–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tranquilli AL, Brown MA, Zeeman GG, Dekker G, Sibai BM. The definition of severe and early-onset preeclampsia. Statements from the International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy (ISSHP). Pregnancy Hypertens. 2013;3(1):44–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2012.11.001.

  18. Ota E, Haruna M, Suzuki M, Anh DD, Tho le H, Tam NT, Thiem VD, Anh NT, Isozaki M, Shibuya K, Ariyoshi K, Murashima S, Moriuchi H, Yanai H. Maternal body mass index and gestational weight gain and their association with perinatal outcomes in Viet Nam. Bull World Health Organ. 2011;89(2):127–36. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.10.077982.

  19. Mustafa R, Ahmed S, Gupta A, Venuto RC. A comprehensive review of hypertension in pregnancy. J Pregnancy. 2012;2012:105918. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/105918.

  20. Teirilä L, Heikkinen-Eloranta J, Kotimaa J, Meri S, Lokki AI. Regulation of the complement system and immunological tolerance in pregnancy. Semin Immunol. 2019;45: 101337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bhattacharya S, Townend J, Shetty A, Campbell D, Bhattacharya S. Does miscarriage in an initial pregnancy lead to adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes in the next continuing pregnancy? BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;115:1623–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01943.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Situ KC, Gissler M, Klemetti R. The duration of gestation at previous induced abortion and its impacts on subsequent births: A nationwide registry-based study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020;99:651–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Laresgoiti-Servitje E. A leading role for the immune system in the pathophysiology of preeclampsia. J Leukoc Biol. 2013;94:247–57. https://doi.org/10.1189/jlb.1112603.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Redman CWG, Sargent IL. Immunology of Pre-Eclampsia. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2010;63:534–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0897.2010.00831.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Saito S, Sakai M, Sasaki Y, Nakashima A, Shiozaki A. Inadequate tolerance induction may induce pre-eclampsia. J Reprod Immunol. 2007;76:30–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jri.2007.08.002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Alshareef SA, Eltom AM, Nasr AM, Hamdan HZ, Adam I. Rubella, herpes simplex virus type 2 and preeclampsia. Virol J. 2017;14:142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Alshareef SA, Nasr AM, Adam I. Toxoplasma gondii infection and pre-eclampsia among Sudanese women. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2018;112(8):393–96. https://doi.org/10.1093/trstmh/try067.

Download references

Acknowledgements

None

Funding

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan

    Ahmed Mohamedain & Duria A. Rayis

  2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Unaizah College of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Qassim University, Unaizah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

    Nadiah AlHabardi & Ishag Adam

Authors
  1. Ahmed Mohamedain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Duria A. Rayis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nadiah AlHabardi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ishag Adam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

AM and IA conceived the study; DAR supervised the work, guided the analysis and critically reviewed the manuscript; NA and IA prepared the analysis plan, performed the data analysis and wrote the first draft of the paper; AM and DAR supervised data collection. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ishag Adam.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The present study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Saad Abuelela Hospital, Sudan (#2020,06). All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Informed consent was obtained from all women.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The Correspondence author (professor Ishag Adam) is one of the senior editorial board members in this Journal. All the other authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mohamedain, A., Rayis, D.A., AlHabardi, N. et al. Association between previous spontaneous abortion and preeclampsia: a case–control study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 22, 715 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-05053-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-05053-8

Keywords

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

ISSN: 1471-2393

Contact us