Skip to main content

Quality of intrapartum care at Public Health Institutions of North Achefer District, North West Ethiopia: a mixed method study

Abstract

Background

Ending preventable maternal, and neonatal morbidity and mortality cannot be achieved without quality care interventions during the intrapartum and postpartum period. Poor quality care during the intrapartum and postpartum period contributes high burden of maternal and neonatal morbidity. Therefore, the current study aimed to assess the quality of intrapartum care and its associated factors in public health facilities in North Achefer District, North West Ethiopia.

Method

A mixed-type institution-based cross-sectional study design was conducted from November 7 to December 6, 2019. Simple random sampling and purposive sampling were used to select study participants for quantitative and qualitative studies respectively. Data were coded and entered into Epi data version 4.4.2 software and exported to SPSS version 25 for analysis. Variables with a p-value of less than and equal to 0.25 were entered into multivariable regression analysis and variables with p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant factors of the quality of intrapartum care. The qualitative data were analyzed by using thematic content analysis. Finally, qualitative findings were used to supplement the quantitative result.

Result

The finding showed that, 27.3% (95% CI: 26.6–28) of mothers received good quality intrapartum care. Presence of long-distance (AOR = 0.19; 95% CI = 0.06, 0.66), health care facility (AOR = 0.07; 95% CI = 0.02, 0.20), and partograph utilization (AOR = 4.9; 95% CI = 1.82, 13.14) were factors associated with the quality of intrapartum care.

Conclusion

The proportion of intrapartum quality care was low. Distance, partograph utilization, and type of health facility were factors associated with quality of intrapartum care. The district, zonal health offices, and regional health bureau should provide capacity building and follow up on partograph utilization, and increase the accessibility of ambulances.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

In developing countries, pregnancy and childbirth-related problems continue to be major causes of morbidity and mortality among women of reproductive age [1]. The intrapartum and immediate postnatal periods are a period when both the woman and her child are at risk [2, 3]. In 2017, an estimated 295,000 women died worldwide as a result of pregnancy and childbirth-related causes, with Sub-Saharan Africa accounting for 66% of the global burden. Ethiopia is one of the Sub-Saharan African countries with the highest maternal mortality rate, with an estimated 16,000 maternal fatalities in the same year [4]. Hemorrhage (34%), sepsis/infections (10%), hypertensive disorders (%), and ectopic pregnancy (5%) are the leading causes of mother’s mortality during childbirth [5].

Providing quality health care is important for the best possible medical outcome of mother and neonate through the provision of care that satisfies users and providers; maintaining sound managerial and financial performance [6, 7]. Because the leading causes of maternal death are preventable, initiatives to lower maternal morbidity and mortality focus on facility-based childbirth, skilled attendance at birth, and prompt referral for emergency obstetric treatment if difficulties arise [8, 9], through poor-quality and inaccessible care coexist everywhere in different countries [10].Quality intrapartum care is considered to be low in Sub-Saharan Africa [11, 12], which could be due to a shortage of human resources [13], social, political, and economic factors [14].

Key maternal mortality control strategies include family planning, competent care attendance during prenatal, delivery, and postpartum periods, and emergency obstetric and newborn care have all been recommended in developing countries [15]. Even through maternal health care intervention coverage has increased in many low-income countries over the last decade, poor quality of care remains a challenge [16, 17]. In 2014, the Ethiopian Federal Ministry of Health identified the quality of hospital-based labor and delivery care as crucial priorities for reducing maternal mortality and morbidity [15, 18]. Although, different studies related to maternal health care service utilization, skill birth attendants, place of birth, intrapartum care service utilization [11, 19], are limited. Therefore, the current study was intended to assess the quality of intrapartum care at public health facility of North West Ethiopia.

Materials and methods

Study design, period, setting, and population

A mixed type institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted at North Achefer District, North West Ethiopia from November 7 to December 6, 2019. According to 2007 Ethiopia central statistics agency census, the Woreda is located 562 km Northwest of Addis Ababa, 102 km west of Bahir Dar [20] with estimated population of 251,873, of which 22, 9312 living in rural areas [20]. The Woreda has one hospital and seven health centers. There were a round 35 health care workers in the eight health institutions. All women delivered in health care institutions, and the skilled birth attendants of North Achefer district (7 health centers and one primary hospital) were the source population. Women delivered with spontaneous vaginal delivery in health care institutions during the data collection period, and the skilled birth attendants were the study population.

Sample size determination

The sample size was determined using single proportion formula with an assumption; 95% confidence interval (CI), marginal error (d), 5% and proportion of non-beneficial practice during childbirth in Ethiopia (P),15% [21].

n = [Z a/2]* p *q/d2= 1.96 * 1.96 * 0.15 * 0.85/0.05 * 0.05=196, with adding 10% for non-response rate; the final sample size was 216 for the quantitative data, and 44 subjects for qualitative data determined through data saturation.

Sampling technique and procedure

Women delivered in eight health facilities (7 health centers and 1 hospital) from November to December, 2019 were participated in the study. The number of participants from each health care facility was proportionally distributed through taking a one year average number of women who gave birth at each facility and estimating in a month, and then participants from each health institution were selected by simple random sampling technique (Fig. 1). Three focus group discussions with twenty four discussants (skilled birth attendants (health care worker who were currently working in maternity ward)), and with twenty in-depth interviews (women who had secondary and above education, and leaders of women’s health developmental army) were undertaken for the qualitative study until the point in data collection when new insights into the research questions were no longer viable. The participants for qualitative study and.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The schematic presentation of participants in North Achefer, 2019

Variables

Dependent variable

Quality of intrapartum care.

Independent variables

Socio-demographic related factors

Age of the mothers,, marital status of mothers, number of children’s, and Level of education mothers.

Primary care function

Antenatal care follow-up for mothers, Strong emotional support of SBAs and Provider responds politely and respectfully, and use of partograph, skin to skin mother to baby care.

Facility level inputs

Facility type the care given, facility opening hour, availability of transportation, Cost for transportation to reach in health facility, and Distance to nearby health facility.

Operational definitions

Quality is measured using items adapted from the WHO standards similar to the national guidelines [22]

Good quality of intrapartum care: If the individual mothers’ score 75% or more of the intrapartum criteria [11].

Poor quality of intrapartum care: If the individual mothers’ score less than 75% of the intrapartum criteria [11].

Data collection tool and procedure

The service provision assessment and availability and readiness assessment tool was used. The tool comprises four parts. These are the Sociodemographic characteristics of the mothers (age, sex, educational level, number of children’s and marital status of the mother), primary care function factors (Antenatal care follow-up for mothers, Strong emotional support of SBAs and Provider responds politely and respectfully, and use of partograph, skin to skin mother to baby care), Facility level inputs factors (Facility type the care given, facility opening hour, availability of transportation, Cost for transportation to reach in health facility, and Distance to nearby health facility.), and quality of interapartum care measuring items had five subthemes with yes/no response (quality of health care service measuring items at during admission (21 items), during 1st stage labor(30 items), 2nd stage labor (6 items), 3rd stage labor (10 items), and immediately at postpartum period (23 items)) [11]. Semi-structured observation to observe the mothers and the skilled birth attendants during child birth and immediately at postpartum periods to assess the quality of care and record review form for gathering data from the mothers chart about the completeness of partograph were used to collect quantitative data respectively. In addition, the qualitative data were collected by using an unstructured interviewer guide through focused group discussion and in-depth interview. Eight Bachelor of Science (BSc) Nurses collected the data under the supervision of two Master of Science (MSc) Nurse. An interviewer and a note taker with a recording device were onsite during the interviews.

Data quality control

Data quality was assured through conducting training for data collectors about the overall process of data collection. The questionnaire was written in English, and then translated into Amharic, which was the study subjects' native language, and finally back to English, by language experts to ensure consistency and conceptual equivalence. At the same time, each completed questionnaire was cheeked for coherence, completeness, and consistency. The daily evaluation was carried out to address any issues that arose during the data collection process. Field notes and audio recordings were examined for appropriateness in terms of accurate coding and audibility for qualitative data. Furthermore, transcriptions were completed in a quiet environment.

Data processing and analysis

The overall quality care was determined through the summation of the quality of intrapartum care measuring items. After data analysis, descriptive statistics such as proportions, percentages, frequency distribution, and graphical presentation were used to describe the data. Variables with a p-value of less than and equal to 0.25 were entered into multivariable regression analysis and variables with p values < 0.05 were considered as statistically significant factors of quality of intrapartum care. For qualitative data, verbatim transcription in the Amharic language was made. The transcribed text file was translated into the English language for analysis. The translated text file was analyzed by using thematic content analysis. Finally, qualitative findings were used to supplement the quantitative result.

Result

Socio-demographic, primary care function, and facility level inputs characteristics of mothers

A total of 216 mothers delivered in 8 health facilities involved in the quantitative study. The mean age of the mothers was 28.4 (SD ± 4.9) years. Two hundred nine, (96.8%) mothers were married, and 124 (57.4%) had children less or equal to two years. Ninety-five mothers, 44% did not pay for transportation to reach the health facilities, (Table 1).

Table 1 Socio-demographic characteristics of mothers delivered in North Achefer health care facilities, North West Ethiopia, 2019

Quality of intrapartum care

A total of 216 women and 44 skilled birth attendants, and women’s for quantitative and qualitative studies were involved respectively. After sum up the intrapartum measuring items (health care quality measuring items under subthemes such as health care given during admission, at 1st stage labor, 2nd stage labor, 3rd stage labor, and immediately at postpartum period), 27.3% (95% CI: 26.6–28) of mothers were received good quality intrapartum care (Fig. 2). This was supported with qualitative findings. In the qualitative study 2 main themes (quality of intrapartum care and challenges or factors for quality of intrapartum care) were created. Majority of the discussants and the interviewee share the idea that the health care delivery services that they gave to mothers during delivery were poor. One of the discussants from the health center said that;

“Many mothers nowadays give birth in hospitals, even if their prior pregnancy was delivered at home. Although some mothers received some basic services, the majority of mothers received unsatisfactory health care. In general, the quality of care provided to mothers in this health center falls far short of what is expected’’(28 years male midwife).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Quality of intrapartum care from admission to immediately at postpartum period given to mothers in North Achefer, 2019

One of the interviewed mothers from the health center said that

“…. I was dissatisfied and unsure about the appropriateness of the service provided to me and my newborn since they were inattentive and lacked confidence” (Para 3, 32 years old mother).

Another male discussant added on this position:

‘‘….mostly we professionals are not updating ourselves with different guidelines, and the care which is given in this health center we can say it is not based on the standard. Therefore the hospital should mentor and correct the health centers. Health care providers at health centers and hospitals should receive various trainings so that they can improve their working processes. If such is the case, I believe mothers will receive better treatment"(24 years old midwife).

Factors associated with good quality of intrapartum care

Long distance, Type of health facility the care given (health center), and partograph utilization were factors associated with good quality intrapartum care.

The odds of mothers who came from a long distance from health facilities were 81% less likely to get a good quality intrapartum care than those who come a shorter distance from health facilities (AOR = 0.19, 95% CI: 0.06, 0.66). This was supported by qualitative finding. A 25 years old male said:

‘‘The first problem I see in providing appropriate care to mothers is distance, especially in rural and remote places where neither an ambulance nor a motorcycle can reach them; as a result, mothers confront a challenge in receiving care” (health officer).

A 45 para 3 mother added:

“Because of the distance, getting health care from health facilities has been difficult. We are from a distant rural area where we are unable to obtain adequate health care; therefore we have chosen to remain at home”.

Women who gave birth at health center were 93% less likely to get good quality intrapartum care than those delivered at the hospital (AOR = 0.07, 95% CI: 0.02, 0.20). In addition, those mother whose progress of labor were followed using partograph were 4.9 times more likely to receive a good quality of intrapartum care than their counterparts (AOR = 4.9, 95% CI: 1.82, 13.14) (Table 2). A 34 years male suggested:

“…mostly in our health center, we professionals do not use partograph during labor; the main reason is that most health workers do not have basic skill to use it”(Nurse).

Table 2 Factors associated with good quality of intrapartum care in public health facilities of North Achefer district, 2019

A 24 male added:

‘‘We asked the administrative bodies to increase duty staff for improving the quality of care, but still no response. Since one person was in duty, we face difficulty in utilizing the patrograph appropriately, so quality affected’’(Midwife).

Discussion

The proportion of good quality intrapartum care was 27.3% (95% CI: 26.6–28). Correspondingly, the qualitative finding showed that nearly all respondents mentioned, health care delivery services that they gave to mothers during delivery were poor. The finding was consistent with a study in Tigray region,29.2% [11]. However, lower than a study done in India, 89.7% [23]. This possible reason could be due to the study in India was carried out for eight months duration with coaches; whereas the current study is for only one month. The recent finding was higher than a study in Tanzania, 14% [24]. The difference might be due to differences in quality assessment method, sample size, and setting. The study conducted in Tanzania covered large catchment area with community based survey, and the assessment method focused of the direct response of mothers with five point likert responses.

In this study, mothers who live a long distance from health facilities were less likely to get a good quality of intrapartum care than those who live a short distance from health facilities. Similarly the qualitative finding supports the quantitative finding. This finding also consistent with studies done in Ghana [25], and low and middle-income countries [26, 27]. The reason could be related to lack of dedicated transportation to reach health facility, especially at night.

Mothers whose labor progress was followed using partograph by health care providers were more likely to receive a good quality of intrapartum care than their counter parts. This finding was in accordance with studies conducted in the Tigray region, Ethiopia [11], Ethiopia’s Hospitals [28], and Thai-Myanmar [29]. This showed a lack of attitude, skill, and knowledge among service providers about partograph completion was reported similarly in Ethiopia. Partograph misuse or non-use can delay treatment in cases of prolonged labor, which can result in complications such as obstructed labor, ruptured uterus, bleeding, fetal death, and infections of both mothers and babies [21].This means that partograph utilization is one of the indicators of progress of labor, which in turn increase the quality of care.

The present study also showed that mothers who delivered at the health center were less likely to get a good quality intrapartum care than those who delivered at the hospital. This finding agrees with the studies conducted in low and middle-income countries [30], and Korea [31]. The possible reasons may be hospitals were mainly found in the town with better access to skilled human resources, frequent supervision, better resource, and referral linkage.

Limitation of the study

Social desirability bias could be the limitation of this study. Respondents were assured complete anonymity and confidentiality throughout the study, which is important to reduce social desirability bias.

Conclusion

In this study, the quality of intrapartum care was below the standard. Distance from mothers’ homes to the nearby health facility, type of health facility care given, and use of partograph to follow the progress of labor were factors associated with the quality of intrapartum care. Therefore, the district, zonal and regional health bureau should work to increase the accessibility of ambulances quickly to remote areas, and conducting on job training sessions on partograph utilization. We recommend researchers conduct follow-up studies that focus quality care on maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Availability of data and materials

All relevant data are within the manuscript.

Abbreviations

AOR:

Adjusted Odds Ratio

COR:

Crude Odds Ratio

FGD:

Focus Group Discussion

FMOH:

Federal Ministry of Health

WHO:

World Health Organization

References

  1. Kassebaum NJ, Bertozzi-Villa A, Coggeshall MS, Shackelford KA, Steiner C, Heuton KR, et al. Global, regional, and national levels and causes of maternal mortality during 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2014;384(9947):980–1004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lawn JE, Kinney M, Lee AC, Chopra M, Donnay F, Paul VK, et al. Reducing intrapartum-related deaths and disability: can the health system deliver? Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2009;107:S123–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Clark SL, Belfort MA, Dildy GA, Herbst MA, Meyers JA, Hankins GD. Maternal death in the 21st century: causes, prevention, and relationship to cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199(1):36.e1-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. World Health Organization. Trends in maternal mortality 2000 to 2017: estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations population division. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Policy-Project. Maternal and neonatal program effort: a tool for maternal health advocates. Washington: Futures group; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pittrof R, Campbell OR, Filippi VA. What is quality in maternity care? An international perspective. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2002;81(4):277–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pittrof R, Campbell OR, Filippi VA. What is quality in maternity care?An international perspective. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2002;2001(81):277–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Khan KS, Wojdyla D, Say L, Gülmezoglu AM, Van Look PF. WHO analysis of causes of maternal death: a systematic review. Lancet. 2006;367(9516):1066–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Filippi V, Ronsmans C, Campbell OM, Graham WJ, Mills A, Borghi J, et al. Maternal health in poor countries: the broader context and a call for action. Lancet. 2006;368(9546):1535–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Koblinsky M, Moyer CA, Calvert C, Campbell J, Campbell OMR, Feigl AB, et al. Quality maternity care for every woman, everywhere:a call to action 2016 [8/21/2019]. Available from: https://www.thelancet.comhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31333-2

  11. Fisseha G, Berhane Y, Worku A. Quality of intrapartum and newborn care in Tigray, Northern Ethiopia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Van den Broek N, Graham W. Quality of care for maternal and newborn health: the neglected agenda. BJOG. 2009;116:18–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kowalewski M, Jahn A. Health professionals for maternity serrvices: experiences on covering the population with quality maternity care. Safe motherhood strategies: a review of the evidence. 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hodin S. Strategies Toward Ending Preventable Maternal Mortality (EPMM) Under the Sustainable Development Goals Agenda Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health 2016 [8/13/2019]. Available from: https://www.mhtf.org/2016...strategies-towardending-preventable-maternal-mortality.

  15. Federal Democratic republic of Ethiopia ministry of health (FDRE MOH). Ethiopian National Health Care Quality Strategy 2016-2020. Available: https://www.medbox.org/document/ethiopian-national-health-care-quality-strategy-2016-2020.

  16. Wereta T, Betemariam W, Karim AM, FessehaZemichael N, Dagnew S, Wanboru A, et al. Effects of a participatory community quality improvement strategy on improving household and provider health care behaviors and practices: a propensity score analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18(Suppl 1):364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fisseha G, Berhane Y, Worku A, Terefe W. Quality of the delivery services in health facilities in Northern Ethiopia. BMC health services research. 2017;17(1):1–7.

  18. Canavan ME, Brault MA, Tatek D, Burssa D, Teshome A, Linnander E, et al. Maternal and neonatal services in Ethiopia: measuring and improving quality. Bull World Health Organ. 2017;95(6):473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kruk ME, Paczkowski MM, Tegegn A, Tessema F, Hadley C, Asefa M, et al. Women’s preferences for obstetric care in rural Ethiopia: a population-based discrete choice experiment in a region with low rates of facility delivery. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010;64(11):984–8.

  20. CSA. Population and housing census. Addis Ababa. 2007.

  21. Getachew A, Ricca J, Cantor D, Rawlins B, Rosen H, Tekleberhan A, et al. Quality of Care for Prevention and Management of Common Maternal and Newborn Complications: A Study of Ethiopia ’s Hospitals, 2011, Maternal and Child Health Integrated Program (MCHIP) and USAID: Jhpiego Brown ’s Wharf, 1615 Thames Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21231 –3492, USA. Available: https://www.mchip.net/sites/default/files/Ethiopia_QoC_formatted_final.pdf.

  22. Sholkamy H, Khalil K, Cherine M, Elnoury A, Breebaart M, Hassanein N. An observation checklist for facility-based normal labor and delivery practices: the Galaa study. Monographs in reproductive health. 2003. p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Marx Delaney M, Maji P, Kalita T, Kara N, Rana D, Kumar K, et al. Improving Adherence to Essential Birth Practices Using the WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist With Peer Coaching: Experience From 60 Public Health Facilities in Uttar Pradesh, India. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2017;5(2):217–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Larson E, Hermosilla S, Kimweri A, Mbaruku GM, Kruk ME. determinants of percieved quality ofobstetric care in rural tanzania: a cross-sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Afari H, Hirschhorn LR, Michaelis A, Barker P, Sodzi-Tettey S. Quality improvement in emergency obstetric referrals: qualitative study of provider perspectives in Assin North district, Ghana. BMJ Open. 2014.

  26. Gabrysch Oona. Still to far to walk: Literature review of thedeterminants of derlivery service use. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009;9:34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. McNamee P, Ternent L, Hussein J. Barriers in accessing maternal healthcare:evidence from low-and middle-income countries. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2009;9(1):41–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Getachew A, Ricca J, Cantor D, Rawlins B, Rosen H, Tekleberhan AB. Quality of Care for Prevention and Management of Common Maternal and Newborn Complications: A Study of Ethiopia’s Hospitals, 2011, Maternal and Child Health Integrated Program (MCHIP) and USAID:. Jhpiego Brown’sWharf, 1615 Thames Street, Baltimore, Maryland 2011:21231-3492.

  29. Hoogenboom G, Thwin MM, Velink K, Baaijens M, Charrunwatthana P, Nosten F, et al. Quality of intrapartum care by skilled birth attendants in a refugee clinic on the Thai-Myanmar border: a survey using WHO Safe Motherhood Needs Assessment. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15(1):17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Flm C, Tj M. Responsiveness of emergency obstetric caresystems in low- and middle-income countries: a critical review of the “thirddelay.” Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013;92:496–507.

  31. Lee S, Choi KS, Kang HY, Cho W, Chae YM. Assesing the factors influencing continious quality implementation:experience in Korean hospitals. Int J Qual Health Care. 2002;14(5):383–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledged health care providers, and mothers who participate in the study and data collectors.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

YA, TT, YD worked on designing the study, train the data collectors, supervise the data collectors, and interpret the result. YA, BM, YE, ZM and DT analyzed the result and wrote the manuscript. All authors involved starting from design, data interpretation, and critically review the manuscript. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zemen Mengesha Yalew.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Research Ethics and Approval Committee of Bahir Dar University's College of Medicine and Health Science gave its approval to the study protocol (Ref.No.medi110432/23). For the study, official letters of cooperation from the Amhara Regional Health Bureau and other relevant areas in the study region were received. Informed written consent was obtained from each study participant, and the respondents had the right not to participate or withdraw from the study at any stage. Additionally, anonymity and confidentiality of the data were kept and all study methods were performed in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki.

Consent to publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Asmare, Y., Tilahun, T., Debela, Y. et al. Quality of intrapartum care at Public Health Institutions of North Achefer District, North West Ethiopia: a mixed method study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 22, 626 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04907-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04907-5

Keywords

  • Intrapartum care
  • Quality
  • Ethiopia