Skip to main content
Download PDF

Geospatial analysis of cesarean section in Iran (2016–2020): exploring clustered patterns and measuring spatial interactions of available health services

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth volume 22, Article number: 582 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The lives of babies and mothers are at risk due to the uneven distribution of healthcare facilities required for emergency cesarean sections (CS). However, CS without medical indications might cause complications for mothers and babies, which is a global health problem. Identifying spatiotemporal variations of CS rates in each geographical area could provide helpful information to understand the status of using CS services.

Methods

This cross-sectional study explored spatiotemporal patterns of CS in northeast Iran from 2016 to 2020. Space–time scan statistics and spatial interaction analysis were conducted using geographical information systems to visualize and explore patterns of CS services.

Results

The temporal analysis identified 2017 and 2018 as the statistically significant high clustered times in terms of CS rate. Five purely spatial clusters were identified that were distributed heterogeneously in the study region and included 14 counties. The spatiotemporal analysis identified four clusters that included 13 counties as high-rate areas in different periods. According to spatial interaction analysis, there was a solid spatial concentration of hospital facilities in the political center of the study area. Moreover, a high degree of inequity was observed in spatial accessibility to CS hospitals in the study area.

Conclusions

CS Spatiotemporal clusters in the study area reveal that CS use in different counties among women of childbearing age is significantly different in terms of location and time. This difference might be studied in future research to identify any overutilization of CS or lack of appropriate CS in clustered counties, as both put women at risk. Hospital capacity and distance from population centers to hospitals might play an essential role in CS rate variations and spatial interactions among people and CS facilities. As a result, some healthcare strategies, e.g., building new hospitals and empowering the existing local hospitals to perform CS in areas out of service, might be developed to decline spatial inequity.

Peer Review reports

Background

Maternal mortality remains a global challenge [1]. Approximately 810 maternal deaths occur due to preventable causes related to pregnancy and childbirth, of which 94% are observed in developing countries [2]. Cesarean section (CS) is often a life-saving intervention for mothers and babies [3]. Inequality in spatial access to CS services significantly increases maternal mortality [4]. However, appropriate spatial access to timely, adequate, and quality CS services can reduce 60% of mortality and complications in mothers and babies [5, 6] in low and low-middle-income countries. On the other hand, CS overutilization by some population groups when it does not have any medical indication is another significant public health problem [7]. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), CS should cover 10% to 15% of all deliveries at most [8, 9]. However, the worldwide CS rate increased from 6.7% in 1990 to 21% in 2021, with 14.3% growth [8], and spatial variations in CS distribution are observed in different geographical areas [10, 11].

Geographical information systems (GIS) are a kind of computer system that integrate both spatial and non-spatial data [12, 13]. Spatial data are related to geography, for example, the locations of women using CS or the hospitals performing CS. Non-spatial data include all of the other data, such as the capacity of hospitals or individual characteristics of women undergoing CS. GIS technology could develop knowledge regarding the spatial distribution of CS cases or the spatial interaction between the women using CS and the hospitals performing CS [14, 15].

The determinants of choosing CS for delivery are multifaceted and complex. The recent scientific literature on why CS is the preferred delivery method could be summarized in four groups of studies. The first group focused on the compulsory causes of CS. They include fear of labor, anxiety for fetal injury/death, doctor’s suggestion, mothers’ previous experiences such as infertility, obstructive labor, anxiety for gynecologic examination, emotional aspects [4, 16], mother’s age, body mass index and her health condition, time of birth, any experience of prior complicated delivery, the weight of baby, pathological placenta, severe bleeding during childbirth, wound infection, hematoma, intestinal obstruction and abnormal prenatal situation [4, 16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24].

The second group of studies focused on socioeconomic factors (e.g., household income, residence address as town or village, education level, and mother’s age at the time of marriage) that could be associated with CS on maternal request (elective CS) [3, 25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]. For instance, Feng et al. [26] showed that the CS rate in urban areas was three times more than in rural areas, and economic condition was one of the most contributing factors in choosing CS rather than natural childbirth.

Some studies as the third group focused on the importance of accessibility to CS-related facilities in choosing the type of delivery [33,34,35]. For instance, Kumar et al. [35] showed that with a 1-km increase in distance from an individual’s place to the nearest medical center for CS operation, the probability of choosing CS is declined by 4.4 times. Also, Kesterton et al. [34] showed a 32% increase in referrals to a hospital for CS with each 5-km closer to the hospital. Emily et al. [4] revealed that CS rates increased in Uganda, and there was geographical heterogeneity in CS rates and inequality in CS-related health facilities.

The fourth group of studies used geographical and spatial analysis to explain and interpret CS rates [11, 19]. For instance, Vanderlaan et al. [11] in Georgia identified counties with high-rate CS clusters had significantly lower access to midwives. Furthermore, more deliveries were paid by Medicaid in these counties, and a higher proportion of births for women belonging to racial/ethnic minority groups were more likely to be rural. In another study in Ethiopia, Tegegne et al. [36] showed that CS rates were clustered in areas with a high percentage of urbanization and the highest available medical facilities (e.g., the country’s capital). In another study in Norway, Mannseth et al. [37] showed that high-risk deliveries were concentrated in large hospitals with better services and equipment that were not evenly distributed in different country regions. Consequently, this affected the CS rates spatial distribution.

In terms of CS rates, North-east Iran, including our study area, is one of the regions with high rates of CS, about 43% [38]. Furthermore, the spatial distribution of health services in this region is highly unequal, affecting the health of mothers and children during childbirth [39]. No study in Iran has examined potential geographical variations of CS with a spatiotemporal approach. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the temporal, spatial, and spatiotemporal patterns of CS in northeastern Iran. The study also attempts to visualize available medical services for CS considering distance and service area approaches.

Methods

Study region

Khorasan-Razavi Province (KRP) is located in North-East Iran at latitude 35.1020° North, longitude 59.1042° East (Fig. 1). KRP covers an area of 119 km2, and its population was about 6,435,000 (12.2% of Iran's population) in 2015, of which 75% were located in urban areas. There were 18 public hospitals in the study area (Fig. 1). All hospitals are located in counties’ centers. In Iran, counties are used as the basic unit of socio-economic and health studies, and most statistics are gathered at this level. Furthermore, most health services are concentrated in counties’ main centers. Therefore, pregnant women living in villages or cities refer to these main centers. There were 30 counties in the study region and, we used county level as the scale for spatial analysis. An important fact is that the people in KRP vary with respect to race and ethnicity. This diversity might be because of the vastness of KRP and its geographical and climate variation, a reflection of the situation of Iran as a whole, which makes KRP a representative sample of the whole country.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Map of the study area including hospital capacity and population density of different counties

Full size image

Datasets

The total CS data including elective and prescribed CS were obtained from Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, which collects and stores information on pregnancy and births in the study area. The data included 74,291 CS from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2020 gathered from 18 public hospitals performing CS. Incomplete and invalid data (123 CS cases) were excluded from analyses. To consider participants’ privacy, all personal information of individuals was removed from the records. Information such as age, residence address, hospital name, and admission dates was used. All spatial data layers were projected to WGS 1984 UTM Zone 40 N system. The number of all staff was used as the hospital's capacity. This information was obtained from the Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, which manages all government hospitals in the study area.

Data analysis

Empirical Bayesian Smoothed (EBS) rates

An Empirical Bayes Smoothing (EBS) approach was used to calculate the spatially smoothed rate of CS deliveries. The relevant number of women of childbearing age (between 15–49 years) varies across areas under investigation, so the precision of raw CS rate varies as well [40]. This variance instability requires smoothing, and we used the local EBS technique to reduce the random fluctuations due to the population size of women of childbearing age [41, 42]. To calculate the local EBS CS rate for each county, we considered the number of CS deliveries as the event variable and the total number of all women of childbearing age as the population field.

CS rates visualization

Choropleth maps represented the EBS CS rates by four rate classes varying from Low: < 65 to high: ≥ 13,553 per 100,000 women at childbearing age. The rates were classified into four classes based on the equal quantile method. This classification let us compare the rates in different periods and geographical areas.

Global spatial autocorrelation

We used Global Moran's Index (GMI) to measure spatial dependency since it is generally more accurate concerning spatial autocorrelation than other metrics [43, 44]. This index measures how one object is similar to others surrounding it. If objects (CS rates in this study at county level) are attracted by each other, it means that the observations are not independent. The "contiguity edges corners" method was used to model spatial relationships, which is suitable for polygon type complications. In this method, polygons that share an edge or a corner will be included in computations for the target polygon [45]. Although GMI statistics is a powerful way to indicate spatial autocorrelation, this method alone cannot identify hidden spatiotemporal patterns and clusters of CS rates over time [46]. To address this limitation, local spatial and spatiotemporal statistics were also used as follows.

Spatiotemporal methods

The Scan statistics methodology includes purely temporal analysis, purely spatial analysis, spatiotemporal analysis, and spatiotemporal variation in temporal trends. The methods can detect clusters irrespective of any predefined geographical boundaries in predefined study time [47]. In this study, the retrospective Poisson probability model as a discrete type of scan statistic was used to analyze the rates of CS deliveries in the study region from 2016 through 2020. Time aggregation length was set to 1 year, and the maximum window size of analysis was adjusted to 50%. The null hypothesis of no clusters was rejected at the simulated p ≤ 0.05 for the primary (most likely) clusters, and 999 Monte Carlo replications were performed for statistical inference. Statistical details of the results of these methods are given in Tables 1, 2 and 3 of Additional file 1.

Interaction analysis

Spatial interaction is the degree of linkage between the origin and the destination [48]. In this study, we used two methods to detect and analyze the spatial interactions among counties centroids and then hospitals based on simplified steps of the gravity model in the GIS environment.

The basic gravity model was used according to Eq. 1 to identify potential spatial interactions among counties (Horner, 2009).

$$I_{ij}=\frac{P_iP_j}{d_{ij}^2}$$
(1)

where \({I}_{ij}\) is the interaction between locations i and j, Pi is the hospital capacity at location i, Pj is the hospital capacity at location j, and dij is the distance between locations i and j. One of the most significant aspects of gravity models (or as they are now known in geography – spatial interaction models) is that they formally specify the relationship between distance and the likelihood of interaction.

In addition to the gravity model, we calculated the CS weighted rate flows for each county using Eq. 2:

$$\mathrm{CS}\;\mathrm{weighted}\;\mathrm{rate}\;\mathrm{flow}:\;\frac{CS\;rate_{i,j}}{\underset{}{\sum CS\;rate_{i,j}}}\mathrm \times1$$
(2)

where; \({CS rate }_{i,j}\), is the rate of CS per 100 hospital staff as its capacity in the county i at hospital j. The result is a normalized value between 0 and 1.

Software

All scan statistics analyses were conducted using SatScan software (developed by Martin Kulldorff and Information Management Services Inc. Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1997). QGIS software version 3.20, a free and open-source GIS software, was used to visualize the choropleth maps and GeoDa 10.8 to calculate EBS rates.

Results

Descriptive analysis

During the study time, from the total 209,935 deliveries performed in public hospitals of KRP, 74,291 deliveries were done by CS (35.39% of the total). The average age of mothers was 32.33 years at the time of CS, but the age followed some geographical variations (Fig. 2). For example, the highest average age was in Joghatai (36 years), and the lowest average was in Firouzeh county (29.20 years). Among the five age groups (15–19, 20–24, 25–29, 30–34, and \(\ge\) 35 years) of mothers who had a CS experience, the highest portion of CS (37.64%) was observed in the age group of 35 years and older. The lowest CS rate (1.48%) was related to the age group of 15 to 19 years.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The percentage of CS (%) and mothers' age groups by county

Full size image

According to Fig. 3, out of 30 counties, 11 (36.7%) counties experienced high rates (mean = 4,670 and SD = 4,553 per 100,000 women of childbearing age). The overall CS rate decreased from 862 per 100,000 women in 2016 to 844 per 100,000 women in 2020. However, the mean rate of CS was higher in 2017 (1,079 per 100,000 women of childbearing age) among the other years. These results confirmed that most counties with high rates (> 5,000 per 100,000 women of childbearing age) were in the east, southeast, and west. The highest rate was 13,553 per 100,000 women of childbearing age.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Rate maps of CS deliveries at the county level in KRP, Iran. Dark-red regions represent the highest CS rates, and light-yellow regions represent the lowest CS rates

Full size image

Purely temporal and spatial clusters

Figure 4A indicates that high-rate time clusters of total CS were predominantly distributed (OE = 1.18, RR = 1.34, LLR = 799.97, p < 0.05) between 2017 and 2018. Global Moran’s I statistics for CS deliveries based on EBS rates (Moran’s I = 0.247, z-score = 2.46, p < 0.05) revealed that the spatial autocorrelation was significant, and the null hypothesis was rejected as CS incidence rates were spatially clustered (Fig. 4B). Figure 5A shows the purely spatial pattern of CS incidence rates based on the Poisson probability model of scan statistics. Five most likely clusters (RR > 1, p < 0.05) (hot spots) were identified that were distributed heterogeneously in the study region, and 14 of the 30 counties were located in these five clusters. Figure 5B displays a bivariate choropleth map comparing hospital capacity and LLR scores based on purely spatial clusters of CS rates in the study region. The result shows that the spatial clustering pattern has followed the spatial distribution pattern of hospital services within the study region.

Fig. 4
figure 4

A Purely temporal clusters identified by 50% maximum window cluster size in the study region between 2016 and 2020, note: the light blue banded plot area shows significant temporal clusters; B Global Moran’s I statistics for EBS rates of CS deliveries per 100,000 women of childbearing age within the study region from 2016 to 2020

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure 5

A Purely spatial clusters of CS rates identified by the SaTScan approach in the study area; B Bivariate choropleth map comparing hospital capacity and LLR score within the study region from 2016 to 2020; shades of purple show significant proportions of both variables

Full size image

Spatiotemporal clusters

The study region's statistically significant high-rate CS spatiotemporal clusters were mainly south to north (Fig. 6). Based on the 50% maximum window size, altogether 13 locations (counties) were classified as high-rate areas in different time periods (RR > 1, p < 0.05) (Fig. 6). For example, cluster one formed from 2017 to 2018 in the southeast, while cluster three was in the north between 2016 and 2017.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Spatiotemporal cluster identified by SaTScan approach between 2016 and 2020

Full size image

Spatial variation in temporal trends

According to Fig. 7, two high-trend CS clusters were found. These clusters included the counties with the highest variations compared to counties inside and outside. The first cluster formed in the north, and the second cluster stood in the southeast of the study area. In the first cluster, one location was in high-trend statistically significant clusters (LRR = 453.01, RR = 1.11, p-value < 0.05). In the second cluster, there were eight statistically significant high-trend clusters (LRR = 31.76, RR = 1.43, p-value < 0.05). It is clear that CS rates were increasing overall, but not in the same way in all areas. For example, cluster one experienced an average annual growth of 61.3%, but this growth was 3.56% in cluster two.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Clusters of spatial variations in temporal trends map

Full size image

Interaction analysis

Figure 8A shows potential spatial interactions score (values normalized between 0 and 1) among 30 counties in the study area based on the “basic gravity model” expressed in Eq. 1. According to this map, some regions in the northeast (Mashhad County) have a high potential gravity (potentially integration score > 0.139) to attract CS flows in the study area. Furthermore, it can be found that close distance and health centers' capacity have a direct effect on increasing spatial interactions. The complete results of interaction analysis have been provided in Additional file 2.

Fig. 8
figure 8

A Potential spatial interaction among the counties in the study area. B CS weighted rate flows values (red color lines) between origins (counties centroids) and destinations (hospitals)

Full size image

The CS weighted rate flows model shows that the intensity of linkages and the capacity of hospitals (Fig. 8B) have a profound effect on the CS flows in the study region.

Figure 9 shows the distance between origins and destinations in km. According to the analysis, the mean distance between county centers and hospitals in the entire study region was 153.7 km. The results show that most hospitals located in the northeast of study area have a shorter mean distance to county centroids (mean distance < 153.7 km). For example, hospitals 3,4,13,14,17, and 18, were at an average distance less than 139.32 km from the county (population centers) centroids and they were spatially most accessible.

Fig. 9
figure 9

Average distance between each public hospital (destinations) and county centroids (origins) in km in the study area. Note: symbols H1 to H18 indicate the identification number of the hospitals

Full size image

Discussion

The present study provided a spatiotemporal analysis of CS rates in northeastern Iran between 2016 and 2020. Our results based on purely spatial analysis of EBS rates showed significant differences among diverse counties regarding CS rates, which led to spatial heterogeneity in the distribution of CS rates in the study region and study time. Moreover, Global Moran’s I autocorrelation test results confirmed the existence of spatial dependency in the study area. The purely spatial analysis was used to find the precise location of clusters and revealed five clusters in the study area (Fig. 5). The spatial distribution of these clusters has followed the spatial distribution of medical services for CS in the study area (Fig. 5). We also identified the space–time and spatial variations in temporal trends clusters of CS EBS rates in the study area based on space–time scan statistics. Our analysis showed significant spatial rate variations among the clusters, as reported in previous studies [36, 49]. In this study, cluster one experienced an average annual growth of 61.3%, but this growth was 3.56% in cluster two (Fig. 7). The high CS growth in cluster one can be due to the allocation of new maternal facilities to the hospital located in Dargaz county (Hospital No. 5) (Fig. 8B) in the region near cluster one. As a result, improving the spatial accessibility to CS facilities might have a considerable role in attracting optional CS demands in this area. Previous studies have also shown that CS rates in nearby hospitals have increased as the distance between hospitals and the place of residence of pregnant women has decreased [34, 35, 49]. For example, Harrison and Goldenberg showed that long distances to health facilities and poor transport systems had been documented as barriers to obtaining CS [50].

CS rates have fluctuated in the geographical areas of the study region at the study time and have decreased in comparison to the start point of the study time in 2016. This decrease can have several reasons; some studies have highlighted the effect of fear of COVID-19 infection on reducing CS on maternal request [51]. Furthermore, some researchers have noted that the implementation of governmental CS restriction guidelines since 2015 in Iran has reduced the rate of CS in public hospitals in recent years [52].

The interaction analysis of hospital facilities has shown that hospital care services have been significantly concentrated in particular areas of the study region and have followed a wholly clustered pattern (spatial dependence). This means an unequal distribution of hospital services care for CS deliveries in the study region (Fig. 8a). Similar studies have shown the same problem in most developing countries [4]. The highest number of referrals for CS was to hospitals concentrated in particular areas. i.e., southeast of KRP in the center of the province with the most equipped and high-quality hospitals. Previous studies have also confirmed that the rate of CS increases in well-equipped and high-capacity hospitals [36, 37, 53].

In future research, information on individual factors such as maternal health characteristics and socio-economic factors (e.g., family income level, mother education level, etc.) might be taken into account in mixed models of both spatial and individual-level analyses to reveal associated factors in regions with high CS rates. Although these hotspot areas might manifest a public health problem, low CS rates in the other sites would not mean that they have a more acceptable situation. Instead, it might reveal that these areas would not have appropriate access to adequate medical care. The women in these areas would have been forced to give natural birth, which could pose risks to the health of mothers and children in situations where CS has medical indications. Therefore, interventions can include improving spatial accessibility to CS services in areas with low accessibility to decrease maternal and child morbidity risk and reduce the inequity of CS-related health services.

The findings of this study showed that although the rate of CS is lower (35.39%) than the national average (47.9%) [54], it is higher than the global average (21%) [8] and the recommended rate of the WHO (10%-15%) [3, 9, 55]. Previous studies have confirmed similar results regarding the high rate of CS in Iran [38, 52]. The CS rate in this study is only for CS performed in public hospitals, while considering the number of CS in private hospitals might cause a higher rate [38]. The results of our study showed that the average age of mothers who used CS was 32.33 years, which confirms the results of previous studies showing that CS rates increase with age [17, 19, 20, 32]. Although the CS generally decreased during the last years in the study region, the rates are still higher than the world average. Our results can assist policymakers in implementing more targeted interventions for CS control and resource allocation in the most in-need areas. The present study reinforces the need for integrated prevention and control strategies of the unnecessary CS in the study region and regional policymakers might take long-term measures to decrease the CS through public awareness.

The present study vividly depicted the temporal, spatial, and spatiotemporal patterns of CS, with heterogeneous spatial patterns in the study region. We showed that integrating scan statistics with GIS visualization techniques is feasible to identify spatiotemporal patterns of CS. The approach can be generalized to other geographical areas as we used a simple dataset mentioned in additional data file.

Policy implications

Policymakers might try to develop and implement some training programs in high clustered areas to reduce voluntary CS without medical indications. Considering that a high number of CS in the study area is optional [56], therefore, there is a need to inform mothers about the risks and consequences of CS through pre-pregnancy education. Based on our findings of the spatial interaction analysis, it was found that there is a kind of inequality in the spatial distribution of hospital facilities for CS in the study area. Consequently, health policymakers need to make suitable and accessible health facilities for mothers who need CS with medical indications. Improving spatial accessibility to the alternative hospitals and empowering the existing local hospitals to perform CS in areas out of service might be considered to decline spatial inequity in health care services.

Limitations

We collected and analysed CS data from public hospitals and did not have private hospitals' data; this might be the underestimation of the CS rate distribution at the population level. However, this limitation would not cause a considerable difference in spatial results because both CS performed in private hospitals and government hospitals are covered by insurance in Iran. In other words, different economic statuses in different geographical areas would not cause any difference in the CS distribution among public and private hospitals. Furthermore, the CS data included both the elective and emergency CS, even though there were some regions with high CS density but that could also be due to the fact that those regions might have substantial progress in maternal and child health by saving women and children at risk during childbirth by CS. Another limitation can be using Euclidean distance as a proxy for travel times. However, as we did this study at the county level, not at the city level with heavy traffic, Euclidean distance would be strongly associated with travel times [57]. Using the number of all hospital staff, not the number of staff related to maternal care, would be another limitation in considering hospitals' capacity. In the end, we analyzed the data at the county level because the residential information was available at this level. A finer geographical level such as town could generate more reliable results.

Conclusions

Both CS overutilization and lack of CS when it has medical indications are significant public health problems that healthcare policymakers might take into account. The CS clustered areas might be investigated to determine why they have lower or higher CS rates than the rest of the study area. Finally, equitable distribution of hospitals and reallocation of healthcare facilities is inevitable in the long-term in the study region to reinforce the regions for performing unintended and urgent CS.

Availability of data and materials

All the data used in this study is publicly available via Additional file 3.

Abbreviations

CS:

Caesarean section

WHO:

World Health Organization

EBS:

Empirical Bayesian Smoothed

GMI:

Global Moran's Index

GIS:

Geographical information system

KDE:

Kernel Density Estimation

OE:

Observed/Expected

RR:

Relative risk

LLR:

Log Likelihood ratio

GI:

Gravity intensity

References

  1. Ozimek JA, Kilpatrick SJ. Maternal mortality in the twenty-first century. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2018;45(2):175–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.OGC.2018.01.004. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29747724/.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Maternal mortality. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/maternal-mortality. [Cited 2022 Apr 14].

  3. Konlan KD, Baku EK, Japiong M, Dodam Konlan K, Amoah RM. Reasons for women’s choice of elective caesarian section in Duayaw Nkwanta Hospital. J Pregnancy. 2019;2019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2320743. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31360548/.

  4. Atuheire EB, Opio DN, Kadobera D, Ario AR, Matovu JKB, Harris J, et al. Spatial and temporal trends of cesarean deliveries in Uganda: 2012–2016. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12884-019-2279-6/FIGURES/2. Available from: https://bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12884-019-2279-6.

  5. Firooznia R, Dargahi H, Jafari-Koshki T, Khaledian Z. Developing an evaluation model for maternity care: a mixed-method study from Iran. Iran J Public Health. 2022;51(1):160–71. https://doi.org/10.18502/IJPH.V51I1.8307. Available from: https://ijph.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ijph/article/view/20833.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Kietpeerakool C, Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Rattanakanokchai S, Vogel JP, Gülmezoglu AM. Pregnancy outcomes of women with previous caesarean sections: secondary analysis of World Health Organization Multicountry Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46153-4. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-46153-4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. MacLellan AN, Woolcott CG, Brown MM, Dodds L, McDonald SD, Kuhle S. Cesarean delivery and healthcare utilization and costs in the offspring: a retrospective cohort study. J Pediatr. 2019;1(209):61-672.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JPEDS.2019.02.031. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30952508/.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Caesarean section rates continue to rise, amid growing inequalities in access. Available from: https://www.who.int/news/item/16-06-2021-caesarean-section-rates-continue-to-rise-amid-growing-inequalities-in-access. [Cited 2022 Jan 28].

  9. Chien P. Global rising rates of caesarean sections. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2021;128(5):781–2. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16666. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1471-0528.16666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Da Silva Campi SF, Nascimento LFC. Spatial distribution of C-sections within the state of São Paulo. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2014;60(5):419–23. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.60.05.008. Available from: http://www.scielo.br/j/ramb/a/vkpLLMxxSJ4QBnrXHcbWfMM/?lang=en.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Vanderlaan J, Edwards JA, Dunlop A. Geospatial variation in caesarean delivery. Nurs Open. 2020;7(2):627. https://doi.org/10.1002/NOP2.433. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7024620/.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Kiani B, Hashemi Amin F, Bagheri N, Bergquist R, Mohammadi AA, Yousefi M, et al. Association between heavy metals and colon cancer: an ecological study based on geographical information systems in North-Eastern Iran. BMC Cancer. 2021;21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08148-1

  13. Mollalo A, Mohammadi A, Mavaddati S, Kiani B. Spatial analysis of COVID-19 vaccination: a scoping review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(22).https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182212024

  14. Hashtarkhani S, Tabatabaei-Jafari H, Kiani B, Furst M, Salvador-Carulla L, Bagheri N. Use of geographical information systems in multiple sclerosis research: a systematic scoping review. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2021;51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2021.102909

  15. Dadashi A, Mohammadi A, MohammadEbrahimi S, Bergquist R, Shamsoddini A, Hesami A, et al. Spatial analysis of the 10 most prevalent cancers in north-eastern Iran, 2017–2018. J Spat Sci. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/14498596.2021.1975583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. O’Donovan C, O’Donovan J. Why do women request an elective cesarean delivery for non-medical reasons? A systematic review of the qualitative literature. Birth. 2018;45(2):109–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/BIRT.12319. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29105822/.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Acharya K, Paudel YR, Health A, Chandra S, Dhungana M. Rising trends and persisting inequalities in cesarean section rates in Nepal: evidence from demographic and health surveys 2006–2016. 2020. https://doi.org/10.21203/RS.3.RS-15560/V2. Available from: https://www.researchsquare.com.

  18. Kim AM, Park JH, Kang S, Yoon TH, Kim Y. An ecological study of geographic variation and factors associated with cesarean section rates in South Korea. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12884-019-2300-0/TABLES/2. Available from: https://bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12884-019-2300-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Srivastava S, Chaurasia H, Kumar Singh KJ, Chaudhary P. Exploring the spatial patterns of cesarean section delivery in India: Evidence from National Family Health Survey-4. Clin Epidemiol Glob Heal. 2020;8(2):414–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEGH.2019.09.012. Available from: http://cegh.net/article/S2213398419303835/fulltext.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Smith GCS, Cordeaux Y, White IR, Pasupathy D, Missfelder-Lobos H, Pell JP, et al. The effect of delaying childbirth on primary cesarean section rates. PLoS Med. 2008;5(7):1123–32. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PMED.0050144. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18597550/.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Benli AR, Benli NC, Usta AT, Atakul T, Koroglu M. Effect of maternal age on pregnancy outcome and cesarean delivery rate. J Clin Med Res. 2015;7(2):97. https://doi.org/10.14740/JOCMR1904W. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4245060/.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ecker JL, Chen KT, Cohen AP, Riley LE, Lieberman ES. Increased risk of cesarean delivery with advancing maternal age: indications and associated factors in nulliparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185(4):883–7. https://doi.org/10.1067/MOB.2001.117364. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11641671/.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Addisu D, Mekie M, Melkie A, Yeshambel A. Burden of obstructed labor in ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Midwifery. 2021;95. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MIDW.2021.102930. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33581417/.

  24. Da Silva Charvalho P, Hansson Bittár M, Vladic Stjernholm Y. Indications for increase in caesarean delivery. Reprod Health. 2019;16(1):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12978-019-0723-8/TABLES/3. Available from: https://reproductive-health-journal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12978-019-0723-8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Faisal-Cury A, Menezes PR, Quayle J, Santiago K, Matijasevich A. The relationship between indicators of socioeconomic status and cesarean section in public hospitals. Rev Saude Publica. 2017;51:14. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1518-8787.2017051006134. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28355336/.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Feng XL, Xu L, Guo Y, Ronsmans C. Factors influencing rising caesarean section rates in China between 1988 and 2008. Bull World Health Organ. 2012;90(1). https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.11.090399. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22271962/.

  27. Guilmoto CZ, Dumont A. Trends, Regional Variations, and Socioeconomic Disparities in Cesarean Births in India, 2010–2016. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(3):e190526–e190526. https://doi.org/10.1001/JAMANETWORKOPEN.2019.0526. Available from: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2728617.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang J, Troendle J, Reddy UM, Laughon SK, Branch DW, Burkman R, et al. Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(4):326. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AJOG.2010.06.058. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20708166/.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Ayalew M, Mengistie B, Dheressa M, Demis A. Magnitude of cesarean section delivery and its associated factors among mothers who gave birth at public hospitals in Northern Ethiopia: institution-based cross-sectional study. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2020;13:1563. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S277747. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7678705/.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Jenabi E, Khazaei S, Bashirian S, Aghababaei S, Matinnia N. Reasons for elective cesarean section on maternal request: a systematic review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;33(22):3867–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2019.1587407. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30810436/.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Uno K, Mayama M, Yoshihara M, Takeda T, Tano S, Suzuki T, et al. Reasons for previous Cesarean deliveries impact a woman’s independent decision of delivery mode and the success of trial of labor after Cesarean. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12884-020-2833-2/TABLES/5. Available from: https://bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12884-020-2833-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Elnakib S, Abdel-Tawab N, Orbay D, Hassanein N. Medical and non-medical reasons for cesarean section delivery in Egypt: a hospital-based retrospective study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/S12884-019-2558-2. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31703638/.

  33. Sarma S. Demand for outpatient healthcare. Appl Heal Econ Heal Policy 2009 74. 2012;7(4):265–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03256160. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF03256160.

  34. Kesterton AJ, Cleland J, Sloggett A, Ronsmans C. Institutional delivery in rural India: the relative importance of accessibility and economic status. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010;10(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-10-30/FIGURES/2. Available from: https://bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2393-10-30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kumar S, Dansereau EA, Murray CJL. Does distance matter for institutional delivery in rural India?. 2014;46(33):4091–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2014.950836. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00036846.2014.950836.

  36. Kassaw TEGEGNE T, Chojenta C, Smith R, Loxton D, Kassaw Tegegne T, Getachew T. Caesarean delivery use in Ethiopia: a spatial and hierarchical Bayesian analysis. 2021. https://doi.org/10.21203/RS.3.RS-572537/V1. Available from: https://www.researchsquare.com.

  37. Mannseth J, Berentsen GD, Skaug HJ, Lie RT, Moster D. Variation in use of Caesarean section in Norway: an application of spatio-temporal Gaussian random fields. Scand J Public Health. 2021;49(8):891–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/14034948211008579. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33938301/.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Badiee S, Ravanshad Y, Azarfar A, Dastfan F, Babayi S, Mirzayi N. Survey of cesarean deliveries and their causes in hospitals affiliated to Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Iran, 2011. Iran J Obstet Gynecol Infertil. 2013;16(66):10–7. https://doi.org/10.22038/IJOGI.2013.1899. Available from: https://ijogi.mums.ac.ir/article_1899.html.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zalvand R, Tajvar M, Pourreza A, Asheghi H. Determinants and causes of maternal mortality in Iran based on ICD-MM: a systematic review. Reprod Health. 2019 Feb 8;16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/S12978-019-0676-Y

  40. Elliott P, Wartenberg D. Spatial epidemiology: current approaches and future challenges. Environ Health Perspect. 2004;112(9):998. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP.6735. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1247193/.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Marshall RJ. Mapping disease and mortality rates using empirical Bayes estimators. Appl Stat. 1991;40(2):283. https://doi.org/10.2307/2347593.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Manton KG, Woodbury MA, Stallard E, Riggan WB, Creason JP, Pellom AC. Empirical Bayes procedures for stabilizing maps of U. S. cancer mortality rates. J Am Stat Assoc. 1989;84(407):637–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1989.10478816. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12155378/.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Anselin L. Local Indicators of Spatial Association—LISA. Geogr Anal. 1995;27(2):93–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1538-4632.1995.TB00338.X. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00338.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Dubé J, Legros D. Spatial econometrics using microdata. Available from: https://www.wiley.com/en-gb/Spatial+Econometrics+using+Microdata-p-9781119008651.

  45. Mitchell A. ESRI Guide to GIS Analysis, Volume 2: Spatial Measurements and Statistics. 2005;252. Available from: http://books.google.com/books?id=sdSTlwEACAAJ&pgis=1.

  46. Kiani B, RaoufRahmati A, Bergquist R, Hashtarkhani S, Firouraghi N, Bagheri N, et al. Spatio-temporal epidemiology of the tuberculosis incidence rate in Iran 2008 to 2018. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12889-021-11157-1/FIGURES/8. Available from: https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-021-11157-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Kulldorff M. SaTScan TM User Guide SaTScan User Guide v10.0. 2021; Available from: http://www.satscan.org/.

  48. Thomas A, Aryal J. Spatial analysis methods and practice: describe–explore–explain through GIS. J Spat Sci. 2021;66(3):533–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/14498596.2021.1955816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Phibbs CS, Mark DH, Luft HS, Peltzman-Rennie DJ, Garnick DW, Lichtenberg E, et al. Choice of hospital for delivery: a comparison of high-risk and low-risk women. Health Serv Res. 1993;28(2):201–22. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1069930/.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Harrison MS, Goldenberg RL. Cesarean section in sub-Saharan Africa. Matern Heal Neonatol Perinatol. 2016;2(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/S40748-016-0033-X. Available from: https://mhnpjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40748-016-0033-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Ranjbar F, Allahqoli L, Ahmadi S, Mousavi R, Gharacheh M, Eshraghi N, et al. Changes in pregnancy outcomes during the COVID-19 lockdown in Iran. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12884-021-04050-7/TABLES/2. Available from: https://bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12884-021-04050-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Azami-Aghdash S, Ghojazadeh M, Dehdilani N, Mohammadi M, Asl Amin Abad R. Prevalence and causes of cesarean section in Iran: systematic review and meta-analysis. Iran J Public Health. 2014;43(5):545. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4449402/.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Baicker K, Buckles KS, Chandra A. Geographic variation in the appropriate use of cesarean delivery. Health Aff (Millwood). 2006;25(5). https://doi.org/10.1377/HLTHAFF.25.W355. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16895942/.

  54. Shirzad M, Shakibazadeh E, Hajimiri K, Betran AP, Jahanfar S, Bohren MA, et al. Prevalence of and reasons for women’s, family members’, and health professionals’ preferences for cesarean section in Iran: a mixed-methods systematic review. Reprod Health. 2021;18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/S12978-020-01047-X. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33388072/.

  55. Dadipoor S, Madani A, Alavi A, Roozbeh N, Safari Moradabadi A. A survey of the growing trend of caesarian section in Iran and the world: a review article. Iran J Obstet Gynecol Infertil. 2016;19(27):8–17. https://doi.org/10.22038/IJOGI.2016.7847. Available from: https://ijogi.mums.ac.ir/article_7847.html.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Amini P, Mohammadi M, Omani-Samani R, Almasi-Hashiani A, Maroufizadeh S. Factors associated with cesarean section in tehran, Iran using multilevel logistic regression model. Osong Public Heal Res Perspect. 2018;9(2):86–92. https://doi.org/10.24171/J.PHRP.2018.9.2.08.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Kiani B, Bagheri N, Tara A, Hoseini B, Tabesh H, Tara M. Revealed access to haemodialysis facilities in northeastern Iran: Factors that matter in rural and urban areas. Geospat Health. 2017;12(2). https://doi.org/10.4081/gh.2017.584

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Mashhad University of Medical Sciences and University of Mohaghegh Ardabili for funding this study.

Funding

This study received funding from Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (number = 4000573) and University of Mohaghegh Ardabili (number = 991523).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran

    Alireza Mohammadi

  2. Department of Human Geography, Faculty of Earth Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

    Elahe Pishgar

  3. Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran

    Zahra Salari

  4. Department of Medical Informatics, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

    Behzad Kiani

  5. Centre de Recherche en Santé Publique, Université de Montréal, 7101, Avenue du Parc, Montréal, Canada

    Behzad Kiani

Authors
  1. Alireza Mohammadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elahe Pishgar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zahra Salari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Behzad Kiani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: AM and BK; Methodology: AM and BK; Formal analysis: AM; Geocoding and cleaning: ZS and EP; Writing: AM, EP and BK; Review and editing: BK; Supervision: AM and BK; Respond to reviewers’ comments: BK and AM; All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript for submission.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Alireza Mohammadi or Behzad Kiani.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study has been approved by the Ethical Committee of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (reference number = IR.MUMS.MEDICAL.REC.1399.571). The data were aggregated at the county level. All experiments were performed according to relevant guidelines and regulations. No individual data was used and due to the retrospective nature of the study, informed consent was waived by the regional committee on ethics in biomedical research of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table 1.

Purely spatial detected clusters based on Poisson scanstatistic model for areas with high rates of C-section cases in RKP, Iran. Table 2. Retrospective Space-Time detected clusters based on Discrete Poisson model for areas with high rates of C-section cases in RKP, Iran. Table 3. Clusters of spatial variations in temporal trends for areas with high rates of C-section cases in RKP, Iran. 

Additional file 2.

Additonal file 3.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mohammadi, A., Pishgar, E., Salari, Z. et al. Geospatial analysis of cesarean section in Iran (2016–2020): exploring clustered patterns and measuring spatial interactions of available health services. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 22, 582 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04856-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04856-z

Keywords

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

ISSN: 1471-2393

Contact us