Skip to main content
Download PDF

Pregnant at the start of the pandemic: a content analysis of COVID-19-related posts on online pregnancy discussion boards

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth volume 22, Article number: 493 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

A growing body of evidence indicates that the COVID-19 pandemic has had detrimental mental health effects for pregnant women. However, little is known about the specific stressors that increased anxiety for pregnant women at the start of the pandemic. The present study aimed to better understand the concerns of pregnant women during the beginning COVID-19 pandemic by analyzing content posted during the month of March 2020 on online pregnancy message boards hosted on WhatToExpect.com.

Methods

All posts published between March 1–31, 2020 on nine different due-date specific WhatToExpect.com message boards were reviewed for COVID-19 relevance. Posts mentioning COVID-19 or its direct effects (e.g., “quarantine” or “stay-at-home order”) were included in our final sample. Data were coded by three authors according to a codebook developed inductively by all four authors. Posts were analyzed by overall frequency of appearance, by trimester, and temporally across the month of March 2020.

Results

Across the 5,541 posts included in our final sample, the most common topics were fear of COVID-19 exposure, concerns with labor and delivery, navigating social interactions, and disruptions to prenatal care. The most dominant topics by trimester were disruptions to prenatal care (first trimester), fear of COVID-19 exposure (second trimester), and concerns about labor and delivery (third trimester).

Conclusion

Our findings add to prior literature by demonstrating the salience of social concerns, which was the third largest COVID-19 topic in our sample. Emotional distress was most salient with regard to restrictions on birthing partners, but was apparent in everything from disruptions to pregnancy announcements, to cancelled baby showers, and limitations on newborn visitors. Given that anxiety during pregnancy is associated with worse maternal–fetal health outcomes, in the early stages of future pandemics healthcare providers should focus not only on strictly health-related concerns expressed by pregnant women, but also more broadly on other sources of anxiety that may be impacting the well-being and mental health of their patients.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

A significant body of literature has demonstrated the detrimental mental health effects the COVID-19 pandemic has had on pregnant women. In studies conducted across different international contexts, largely in the early stages of the pandemic, pregnant women consistently reported a high prevalence of anxiety and depressive symptoms [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. One review of the literature found rates as high as 58% for depression (in Spain) and 72% for anxiety symptoms (in Canada) amongst pregnant women [18]. The most comprehensive literature review published to-date on mental health and pregnancy during COVID-19, which encompassed 81 publications, concluded that there were “increased psychological symptoms, especially depressive and anxiety symptoms, in pregnant and postpartum women during COVID-19” [19].

Given that anxiety during pregnancy is associated with adverse maternal–fetal health outcomes [20,21,22,23,24], several studies attempted to obtain a deeper understanding of the driving factors of anxiety during COVID-19. This research found that concerns about childbirth, family members getting COVID-19, having a good birthing experience, and disruption of routine care all represented significant sources of stress [3, 25,26,27,28]. However, these studies have had limitations: many have been structured surveys, often administered via the Internet, with categories of concern prepopulated by researchers; most also utilized retrospective recall of mental health symptoms, which has a high risk of bias [19]. Thus, the overall context of anxiety during pregnancy has not been clearly or comprehensively elucidated.

An alternative method of assessing COVID-19-related concerns is to examine online content that is generated via social media and discussion boards. This approach is advantageous in that it utilizes text that has been generated in a naturalistic context, and provides a degree of temporal specificity (i.e., posts can be mapped to precise timepoints) that is absent from more traditional quantitative and qualitative methods. To date, many studies have characterized COVID-19 concerns on Twitter, Reddit, and other online fora [29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39], but only one—a content analysis of a Japanese question-and-answer website—specifically examined concerns of pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic [40].

Online discussion boards related to pregnancy, such as those hosted by websites like WhatToExpect.com and BabyCenter.com, have become popular outlets for expectant mothers to seek healthcare information and emotional support from a virtual community of their peers [41, 42]. Because women often join specific discussion boards based on their due date, prior studies examining these fora—using both automated topic-modeling and manual qualitative analysis—have mapped the specific issues that women most commonly discuss in each trimester of pregnancy [43, 44].

Building on this literature, the present study aimed to better understand the concerns of pregnant women at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic by analyzing content on online discussion boards hosted on WhatToExpect.com. We sought to identify general areas of COVID-19 concern, as well as frequently appearing COVID-19 topics within each trimester, to gain a deeper knowledge of how pandemic-related worries may have varied for women at different stages of pregnancy at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic.

We chose to focus on posts made on WhatToExpect.com during the month of March 2020 for several reasons. First, this website caters to women from English-speaking countries (primarily the United States and Canada), where the most dramatic initial social and travel restrictions (i.e., travel bans and lockdown regulations) occurred in March 2020 [45, 46]; thus we expected to observe the greatest changes in the content of posts throughout this month. Second, since many prior studies of pregnant women’s mental health gathered data from early in the pandemic, and specifically during March 2020 [3, 8, 15, 47,48,49], we chose this timeframe so that our data would both complement and yield greater insight into this prior literature. Third, as March 2020 was the timepoint of greatest uncertainty for pregnant women in English-speaking countries as the COVID-19 pandemic initially unfolded, we expected that data from our study would yield information that might be generalizable to early stages of future pandemics.

Methods

Our dataset consisted of all COVID-19-related posts published on nine different WhatToExpect.com online discussion boards between March 1 and March 31, 2020. We chose the website WhatToExpect.com (owned J2 Global, Inc.) because it hosts one of the most active discussion boards for English-speaking women [43] and all posts on the platform are publicly viewable. While the website does not display demographic information about its users, in previous research, the majority appeared to be from the United States, with a smaller number from other English-speaking countries such as Canada, the United Kingdom (UK), and Australia [43].

The most popular fora on the site are due date specific message boards (e.g., “November 2020 Babies Group”) where women can engage with a virtual community experiencing a similar chronological pregnancy journey. Because we sought to capture data from women in each of the three trimesters, we chose nine different due date message boards that roughly corresponded to the first trimester (September, October, November 2020 discussion boards), second trimester (June, July, August 2020 discussion boards), and third trimester (March, April, May 2020 discussion boards) during the March 1 – 31, 2020 time period of interest [43].

All posts made during the month of March 2020 on these nine message boards were reviewed by three authors (AN, DK, RC) for COVID-19 relevance. Posts that mentioned COVID-19 in the title or text of the post (e.g., “pandemic,” “coronavirus,” “COVID-19,” “covid,” and “corona”) or had any mention of direct COVID-19-related effects (“quarantine,” “self-quarantine,” “stay-at-home order,” “social distancing,” etc.) were included in our study. In cases where the posts did not explicitly mention COVID-19 but alluded to it (e.g., “What question should I be asking my doctor with everything going on?”), the post was reviewed by all three authors and included if it was unanimously judged to be related to COVID-19.

Qualitative data analysis was conducted according to the principles of grounded theory [50], with codes (i.e., topics) developed inductively by three authors following an examination of a subset of posts. Codes were iteratively revised in a process that involved reviewing additional data and revising code definitions [51]. Next, all four authors employed the process of code-mapping [52], whereby codes are combined and recategorized, to create both main codes (topics) and various subcodes (subtopics). For example, a post expressing concern about being induced early due to COVID-19 was coded to the subtopic “changes to planned birth schedule” within the overall umbrella topic of “labor and delivery.”

Each author reviewed approximately one-third of the dataset and assigned each forum post to a single code. To ensure that all three authors were employing codes consistently, a random subset of 200 posts was separately coded and reviewed by all three authors. Results were compared and discrepancies were resolved through discussion among the authors. Three-way agreement was 74% (two-way interrater reliability across posts averaged 92.1%). All codes were entered and cleaned in Excel (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA, USA). Codes were analyzed by frequency of appearance, both overall (i.e., how often a given topic appeared across the entire dataset) and within trimesters (i.e., how often a give topic arose amongst posts from women in their first, second, or third trimester). Codes were also analyzed for variation over time through the month of March 2020; this temporal analysis was conducted using Tableau (Tableau Software, Seattle, WA, USA). This study was deemed exempt from review by the University of Pennsylvania Institutional Review Board as it did not meet the regulatory definition for human subject research and used publicly available data.

Results

Approximately 60,600 posts were published between March 1 and March 31, 2020 across the nine groups included in our sample. Of those, 5,541 met our COVID-19 inclusion criteria and comprised our final sample. In line with our previous work examining these fora, it was our impression that the vast majority of posters were based in the United States, with a smaller number from other English-speaking countries. Nearly all posts appear to have been made by women, and there were frequent mentions of husbands and boyfriends but an absence of references to same-sex partners.

Figure 1 presents a detailed view of the most common COVID-19-related topics sorted by overall frequency of appearance. Overall, the largest number of posts across all trimesters were related to concerns about exposure to COVID-19 (16.2%). As shown in Table 1, which depicts subtopics and sample posts, the most common among these were fears about being exposed at work, with many posts coming from healthcare professionals or educators who did not have the option to work remotely. Amongst women in the first trimester, many posts were related to revealing the pregnancy to a supervisor earlier than they had planned. Other concerns in this topic centered on fear of being exposed to COVID-19 in medical settings like hospitals and doctors’ offices (e.g., wondering whether to “risk going to the clinic” for prenatal care) or being exposed at home due to family members’ behaviors (e.g., their husbands were “not taking COVID-19 seriously” by seeing friends at bars or going golfing).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Most common COVID-19-related topics discussed on WhatToExpect.com online message boards. Main topics across all 5,541 posts are shown at left, sorted by overall frequency of appearance. The most frequently appearing topics within each of the three trimesters are shown in the heat map, with dark blue representing the most common topic within each trimester and light blue representing the least common

Full size image
Table 1 Subtopics and sample posts for COVID-19 exposure topic
Full size table

Posts about labor and delivery comprised the second largest topic (15.5%); most common were discussions related to disappointment about giving birth without the labor partners they had imagined would be present (Table 2). Women wrote about having to choose between their doula and their husband, having to exclude a close family member (e.g., their mother) from the delivery room, or having to give birth alone, either due to hospital policy or because of childcare constraints during COVID-19. These posts typically utilized highly emotive language, indicating shock (“I can’t believe I’m going to be forced to give birth by myself”), despair (“I just can’t stop crying”), and sadness (“I am really bummed my mom can no longer be part of the experience”).

Table 2 Subtopics and sample posts for labor and delivery topic
Full size table

Discussions of hospital policy changes were another dominant subtopic in the labor and delivery category. Here, women sought general comparative information about labor and delivery policies in other hospitals, such as COVID-19 screening procedures, who was allowed in the delivery room, whether partners would be allowed to stay after delivery, and postpartum visitation protocols. Posts were both general (e.g., “What states or countries issued a rule of having no one with you when you deliver?”) and geographically specific (e.g., “Does anyone know the current rules for Australian hospitals?”). After two New York City hospital systems enacted a ban on labor partners on March 23 [53], women encouraged their peers to sign online petitions calling for the reversal of these policies. Other subtopics within the labor and delivery category included changes to a planned birth schedule (e.g., cancellations or postponements of scheduled inductions and Caesarian sections) and considerations of home births instead of hospital deliveries.

Concerns about how to navigate social interactions comprised the third largest topic (12.6%; Table 3), driven by a significant number of posts about baby showers made by women in the second and third trimesters. Towards the beginning of March, the majority of baby shower posts centered on women wondering whether they should cancel a planned shower. However, as the month progressed, the content of the baby shower posts shifted to queries about cancelling or postponing a shower (e.g., what wording to use in an email), the social etiquette surrounding gift-giving for a cancelled shower, and ideas for how to host a shower safely (e.g., online or socially distant). Other non-baby-shower related subtopics in this category included seeking information from peers on changes to social behaviors (e.g., wondering whether to keep kids from attending birthday parties and whether to allow friends into one’s home) and navigating the social aspects of disclosing a pregnancy earlier or differently than expected (e.g., announcing the news via video chat instead of in-person).

Table 3 Subtopics and sample posts for social interactions topic
Full size table

Prenatal care comprised another main topic of concern (10.7%); most posts centered on the cancellation or postponement of routine in-person appointments and ultrasound scans (Table 4). Some women wondered about the utility of virtual appointments (e.g. “What can they even check if the whole appointment is online?”) and missed the reassurance that in-person appointments provided (e.g., “Doctor called and told me not to come into my appointment next week. How will I know my baby is okay?”). Many women noted that they had not seen their doctors in a while. In addition to disruptions to routine prenatal care, women discussed interruptions to supplemental prenatal care (e.g., cancelled childbirth classes, breastfeeding classes, and hospital tours), and a subset expressed concern about the worsening of a preexisting mental health condition due to the combined effect of pregnancy and COVID-19.

Table 4 Subtopics and sample posts for prenatal care topic
Full size table

Within the topic coded as “Information” (8.1% of all posts; Table 5), the majority of posts were from women sharing information about the impact of COVID-19 on pregnancy, such as links to articles or guidelines (e.g., Center for Disease Control recommendations for pregnant women). Some noted that they were sharing links due to the lack of existing information about pregnancy and COVID-19. Other posts in this category were from women seeking health information (e.g., “Is hand sanitizer safe for pregnant women?” and “Does anyone know if pregnant women are at higher risk of contracting the virus?”). Posts coded to this topic were distinguished from those coded to the next most frequent topic, “General COVID-19” (7.6% of all posts) in that the former were pregnancy-specific, whereas the latter consisted of questions that could have been asked by anyone during COVID-19 (e.g., “What are you cleaning with and how often?” and “Am I allowed to go to the pharmacy during mandatory lockdown?”).

Table 5 Subtopics and sample posts for information topic
Full size table

Among the remaining topics, “Getting COVID-19” (6.5% of all posts; see subtopics and sample posts in Additional file 1) included discussion of friends or family members testing positive for COVID-19, sharing of potential symptoms of COVID-19, and anxiety about possibly being infected by the virus. “Occupation” (4.5%) consisted of women seeking advice for work-related planning in the context of COVID-19, such as maternity leave policies, getting laid off due to the pandemic, and managing finances. Posts coded to “Newborn and Postpartum” (5.1%) were dominated by questions of how to navigate the issue of newborn visitors; other subtopics included changes to newborn photoshoots, lack of postpartum support, and concerns with accessing pediatric care. “Baby Supplies” (3.3%) and “Travel” (2.1%) comprised other topic categories.

A subset of posts (1.9%) expressed multiple COVID-19 concerns; because these often were qualified with “I’m ranting now…” and “just need to vent”, they were coded separately under “COVID-19 Rants.” Miscellaneous posts (6.0%) were coded to the “Other” category; examples include discussing a “silver lining” to the pandemic, sharing funny stories and memes, and requesting that others post something positive.

The most frequently appearing topics within each of the three trimesters are shown in the heat map in Fig. 1 with dark blue representing the most common topic within each trimester and light blue representing the least common. Dominant topics varied by trimester: the impact of COVID-19 on labor and delivery was the most common topic amongst women in the third trimester, fear of COVID-19 exposure was the most frequent in the second trimester, and prenatal care was the most common in the first trimester. Across all trimesters, navigating social interactions and general exposure represented significant concerns.

Topic distribution was mapped temporally across all days in March 2020 (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

COVID-19 topic distribution mapped temporally across the month of March 2020. Note that topics with < 2% of posts and “Other” category are not depicted

Full size image

For all topics, there was little activity in the first ten days of March, aside from that related to media articles and travel-related questions. Posts gradually increased after March 11, peaking on March 16 with a daily total of 408 posts. The large increase in posts in the second week of March is correlated with the World Health Organization (WHO) officially declaring the outbreak a global pandemic on March 11 [54], as well as the rapidly increasingly recognition—driven by quarantine restrictions and cancellations of major sports and arts events—that a major public health crisis had emerged [45, 55, 56]. Some daily increases appear to have been tied to specific events: for example, the number of posts about delivering without a planned birthing partner peaked on March 23, the day that two New York City health systems banned labor partners in the delivery room [53, 57], and posts coded to “Information” peaked on March 16, when a Daily Mail article [58] about the UK’s proposed quarantine restrictions for pregnant women was widely shared across different message boards.

Discussion

The present study provides a comprehensive overview of the COVID-19-related topics that appeared across 5,541 posts on online pregnancy-related discussion boards in March 2020, when the pandemic first became a national health emergency in English-speaking countries. In line with previous studies [2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 59], our results indicate that fear of COVID-19 exposure, impacts of the pandemic on labor and delivery, and disruptions to prenatal care were significant sources of concern at the start of the pandemic. Notably, our findings add to prior literature that assessed the mental health of pregnant women during early stages of the pandemic by demonstrating the salience of social concerns, as the third largest COVID-19 topic in our sample was related to navigating social interactions.

Our results also provide a glimpse into how, at the beginning stage of COVID-19, pandemic-related concerns varied for women at different stages of pregnancy. That impact to labor and delivery was the most common topic in the third trimester is in line with previous studies of online pregnancy forums, which has found that discussions of labor and delivery represent a disproportionately large share of posts [43, 44]. In the second trimester, where discussions of labor and delivery were less prevalent, the most dominant topic was fear of COVID-19 exposure. In the first trimester, impacts on prenatal care were particularly salient, with many women expressing concern about the health of their baby in the absence of in-person physician visits and ultrasound scans.

Across all topics, a recurring theme was that of disruptions to the imagined experience of pregnancy and childbirth—of women coming to terms with the reality of how the pandemic had suddenly and dramatically reshaped a momentous time period in their lives. The emotional distress was most salient with regard to restrictions on birthing partners, but disappointment and anxiety were apparent in everything from disruptions to pregnancy announcements, to cancelled baby showers, and limitations on newborn visitors. That pregnant women turned to online discussion boards to express frustration and seek support from their peers is not surprising, as prior literature has pointed to seeking emotional and social support as one of the primary reasons for participating in online pregnancy fora [43, 44, 60,61,62].

A secondary theme cutting across many of the topics in our study was how the pandemic removed established avenues of support and reassurance, such as in-person doctor’s visits, supplemental prenatal classes, and assistance from family and friends. Social support throughout pregnancy has been associated with better maternal health outcomes [63,64,65], whereas the lack of social support is a noted risk factor for poor pregnancy outcomes [66, 67]. The pandemic therefore created a doubly negative effect for women’s health: it both increased episodes that could lead to anxiety and stress, while at the same time removing the networks of social support that may have helped women cope more efficaciously [68].

This study has several limitations. First, we did not have access to demographic information such as age, gender, geographic location, and whether women were nulliparous vs. primiparous. As noted earlier, however, it was our impression that nearly all posts were made by pregnant women, the majority of whom appeared to be based in the United States. Second, all posts were coded to a single primary code for analytic purposes, even though in some cases posts may have touched upon more than one topic. Third, because we captured posts from March 2020, the COVID-19 topics that arose in our sample may not be reflective of COVID-19-related concerns at later timepoints, and COVID-19-related concerns of pregnant women may have shifted (or waned) since the start of the pandemic. Fourth, frequency of appearance of a topic does not necessarily reflect saliency; thus we have endeavored to note when specific topics used stronger emotional language. Finally, our findings may not be reflective of the concerns of all pregnant women, as it is unknown how those who post to online message boards may differ from those who do not.

By analyzing content created in a naturalistic context, rather than as responses to structured surveys, our findings add insight to the body of literature that has examined how the mental health of pregnant women is negatively affected during the early stages of pandemics [69]. Even though the COVID-19 pandemic is currently waning in many English-speaking countries and is likely approaching long-term endemicity [70,71,72], our results are relevant for future pandemics, as they demonstrate sources of anxiety and stress during early periods of uncertainty. It is crucial in future pandemics, therefore, that healthcare providers focus not only on strictly health-related concerns expressed by pregnant women, but also attend more broadly to other sources of anxiety that may be impacting the well-being and mental health of their patients.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to the Terms of Use of WhatToExpect.com (https://www.whattoexpect.com/terms-of-use/), which prohibit reproduction or redistribution of content on their platform. However, the content of posts used in this study is publicly available, and examples of posts coded to each topic and subtopic are provided in Tables 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and Additional file 1.

References

  1. Ayaz R, Hocaoğlu M, Günay T, Yardımcı OD, Turgut A, Karateke A. Anxiety and depression symptoms in the same pregnant women before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Perinat Med. 2020;48(9):965–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Farrell T, Reagu S, Mohan S, Elmidany R, Qaddoura F, Ahmed EE, et al. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the perinatal mental health of women. J Perinat Med. 2020;48:971–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Naurin E, Markstedt E, Stolle D, Enström D, Wallin A, Andreasson I, et al. Pregnant under the pressure of a pandemic: a large-scale longitudinal survey before and during the COVID-19 outbreak. Eur J Public Health. 2020;31:7–13.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Wu Y, Zhang C, Liu H, Duan C, Li C, Fan J, et al. Perinatal depressive and anxiety symptoms of pregnant women during the coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak in China. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;223:240.e1-240.e9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Moyer CA, Compton SD, Kaselitz E, Muzik M. Pregnancy-related anxiety during COVID-19: a nationwide survey of 2740 pregnant women. Archives Women’s Ment Heal. 2020;23:757–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ahlers-Schmidt CR, Hervey AM, Neil T, Kuhlmann S, Kuhlmann Z. Concerns of women regarding pregnancy and childbirth during the COVID-19 pandemic. Patient Educ Couns. 2020;103:2578–82.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. López-Morales H, del Valle MV, Juric LC, Andrés ML, Galli JI, Poó F, et al. Mental health of pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal study. Psychiat Res. 2020;295: 113567.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Farewell CV, Jewell J, Walls J, Leiferman JA. A Mixed-Methods Pilot Study of Perinatal Risk and Resilience During COVID-19. J Prim Care Community Heal. 2020;11:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Liu CH, Erdei C, Mittal L. Risk factors for depression, anxiety, and PTSD symptoms in perinatal women during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Psychiat Res. 2021;295: 113552.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Preis H, Mahaffey B, Heiselman C, Lobel M. Pandemic-related pregnancy stress and anxiety among women pregnant during the COVID-19 pandemic. Am J Obstetrics Gynecol Mfm. 2020;2: 100155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ceulemans M, Hompes T, Foulon V. Mental health status of pregnant and breastfeeding women during the COVID-19 pandemic: A call for action. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2020;151:146–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ceulemans M, Foulon V, Ngo E, Panchaud A, Winterfeld U, Pomar L, et al. Mental health status of pregnant and breastfeeding women during the COVID‐19 pandemic—A multinational cross‐sectional study. Acta Obstet Gyn Scan. 2021;100:https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14092.

  13. Ho-Fung C, Andersson E, Hsuan-Ying H, Acharya G, Schwank S. Self-reported mental health status of pregnant women in Sweden during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey. Bmc Pregnancy Childb. 2022;22:260.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Durankuş F, Aksu E. Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on anxiety and depressive symptoms in pregnant women: a preliminary study. J Maternal-fetal Neonatal Medicine. 2020;35:1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Berthelot N, Lemieux R, Garon-Bissonnette J, Drouin-Maziade C, Martel É, Maziade M. Uptrend in distress and psychiatric symptomatology in pregnant women during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Acta Obstet Gyn Scan. 2020;99:848–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Stampini V, Monzani A, Caristia S, Ferrante G, Gerbino M, Pedrini AD, et al. The perception of Italian pregnant women and new mothers about their psychological wellbeing, lifestyle, delivery, and neonatal management experience during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown: a web-based survey. Bmc Pregnancy Childb. 2021;21:473.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kotlar B, Gerson E, Petrillo S, Langer A, Tiemeier H. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on maternal and perinatal health: a scoping review. Reprod Health. 2021;18:10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Ahmad M, Vismara L. The psychological impact of COVID-19 pandemic on women’s mental health during pregnancy: a rapid evidence review. Int J Environ Res Pu. 2021;18:7112.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Iyengar U, Jaiprakash B, Haitsuka H, Kim S. One year into the pandemic: a systematic review of perinatal mental health outcomes during COVID-19. Frontiers Psychiatry. 2021;12:674194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Alder J, Fink N, Bitzer J, Hösli I, Holzgreve W. Depression and anxiety during pregnancy: A risk factor for obstetric, fetal and neonatal outcome? A critical review of the literature. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009;20:189–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Shahhosseini Z, Pourasghar M, Khalilian A, Salehi F. A review of the effects of anxiety during pregnancy on children’s health. Mater Sociomed. 2015;27:200–2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Schetter CD, Tanner L. Anxiety, depression and stress in pregnancy. Curr Opin Psychiatr. 2012;25:141–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kinsella MT, Monk C. Impact of maternal stress, depression and anxiety on fetal neurobehavioral development. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2009;52:425–40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Grigoriadis S, Graves L, Peer M, Mamisashvili L, Tomlinson G, Vigod SN, et al. Maternal Anxiety During Pregnancy and the Association With Adverse Perinatal Outcomes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Psychiatry. 2018;79:e1–e22.

  25. Gur RE, White LK, Waller R, Barzilay R, Moore TM, Kornfield S, et al. The disproportionate burden of the COVID-19 pandemic among pregnant black women. Psychiat Res. 2020;293:113475.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sahin BM, Kabakci EN. The experiences of pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic in Turkey: A qualitative study. Women Birth. 2020;34:162–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ravaldi C, Wilson A, Ricca V, Homer C, Vannacci A. Pregnant women voice their concerns and birth expectations during the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy. Women Birth. 2020;33: 106440.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Basu A, Kim HH, Basaldua R, Choi KW, Charron L, Kelsall N, et al. A cross-national study of factors associated with women’s perinatal mental health and wellbeing during the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS ONE. 2021;16: e0249780.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Gozzi N, Tizzani M, Starnini M, Ciulla F, Paolotti D, Panisson A, et al. Collective response to the media coverage of COVID-19 Pandemic on Reddit and Wikipedia: Mixed-Methods Analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22: e21597.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Park HW, Park S, Chong M. Conversations and medical news frames on twitter: infodemiological study on COVID-19 in South Korea. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22:e18897.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Kouzy R, Jaoude JA, Kraitem A, Alam MBE, Karam B, Adib E, et al. Coronavirus goes viral: quantifying the COVID-19 misinformation epidemic on twitter. Cureus. 2020;12:e7255.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Abd-Alrazaq A, Alhuwail D, Househ M, Hamdi M, Shah Z. Top concerns of tweeters during the COVID-19 pandemic: infoveillance study. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22:e19016.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Han X, Wang J, Zhang M, Wang X. Using social media to mine and analyze public opinion related to COVID-19 in China. Int J Environ Res Pu. 2020;17:2788.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Lu Y, Zhang L. Social media WeChat infers the development trend of COVID-19. J Infection. 2020;81:e82–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Stokes DC, Andy A, Guntuku SC, Ungar LH, Merchant RM. Public priorities and concerns regarding COVID-19 in an online discussion forum: longitudinal topic modeling. J Gen Intern Med. 2020;35:2244–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Ölcer S, Yilmaz-Aslan Y, Brzoska P. Lay perspectives on social distancing and other official recommendations and regulations in the time of COVID-19: a qualitative study of social media posts. BMC Public Health. 2020;20:963.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Lwin MO, Lu J, Sheldenkar A, Schulz PJ, Shin W, Gupta R, et al. Global sentiments surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic on twitter: analysis of twitter trends. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020;6:e19447.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Tsao S-F, Chen H, Tisseverasinghe T, Yang Y, Li L, Butt ZA. What social media told us in the time of COVID-19: a scoping review. Lancet Digital Heal. 2021;3:e175–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Gianfredi V, Provenzano S, Santangelo OE. What can internet users’ behaviours reveal about the mental health impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic? A systematic review Public Health. 2021;198:44–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Shirabe R, Okuhara T, Yokota R, Okada H, Goto E, Kiuchi T. Changes in anxiety and stress among pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic: content analysis of a Japanese social question-and-answer website. Jmir Pediatrics Parent. 2021;4:e27733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Brashich A. The new generation of pregnancy websites and apps you need to know about. Washington, D.C: The Washington Post; 2016.

  42. Crabbe RES, Stone P, Filoche SK. What are women saying about noninvasive prenatal testing? An analysis of online pregnancy discussion forums. Prenatal Diag. 2019;39:890–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Wexler A, Davoudi A, Weissenbacher D, Choi R, O’Connor K, Cummings H, et al. Pregnancy and health in the age of the Internet: A content analysis of online “birth club” forums. PLoS ONE. 2020;15: e0230947.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Gui X, Chen Y, Kou Y, Pine K, Chen Y. Investigating Support Seeking from Peers for Pregnancy in Online Health Communities. PACM on Human-Computer Interaction. 2017;1(50):1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC Museum COVID-19 Timeline. 2022. https://www.cdc.gov/museum/timeline/covid19.html. Accessed 2 May 2022.

  46. Canadian Institute for Health Information. COVID-19 Intervention Timeline in Canada. https://www.cihi.ca/en/covid-19-intervention-timeline-in-canada. Accessed 12 May 2022.

  47. Ahorsu DK, Imani V, Lin C-Y, Timpka T, Broström A, Updegraff JA, et al. Associations between fear of COVID-19, mental health, and preventive behaviours across pregnant women and husbands: an actor-partner interdependence modelling. Int J Ment Health Ad. 2022;20:68–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Saccone G, Florio A, Aiello F, Venturella R, Angelis MCD, Locci M, et al. Psychological impact of coronavirus disease 2019 in pregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;223:293–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Sun G, Wang F, Cheng Y. Perinatal depression during the COVID-19 epidemic in Wuhan. China Ssrn Electron J. 2020. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3576929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Reserach. Piscataway: Transaction Publishers; 1967.

  51. DeCuir-Gunby JT, Marshall PL, McCulloch AW. Developing and Using a Codebook for the Analysis of Interview Data: An Example from a Professional Development Research Project. Field Method. 2011;23:136–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Jobin A, Ienca M, Vayena E. The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nat Mach Intell. 2019;1:389–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Caron C, Syckle KV. Some Pregnant Women in New York City Will Have to Deliver Babies Alone. New York City: The New York Times; 2020.

  54. Ghebreyesus TA. WHO Director-General’s opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020.

  55. Rich M, Futterman M, Panja T. I.O.C. and Japan Agree to Postpone Tokyo Olympics. New York City: The New York Times; 2020.

  56. Stevis-Gridneff M, Pérez-Peña R. Europe Barricades Borders to Slow Coronavirus. New York City: The New York Times; 2020.

  57. Caron C, Sykle KV. Laboring Alone: Some Hospitals Bar Partners Because of Virus Fears. New York City: The New York Times; 2020.

  58. Chalmers V. Pregnant women will be told to stay indoors for three months along with over 70s to avoid catching the deadly coronavirus, Government announces. London: Daily Mail; 2020.

  59. Wu H, Sun W, Huang X, Yu S, Wang H, Bi X, et al. Online antenatal care during the COVID-19 pandemic: opportunities and challenges. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22:e19916.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Romano AM. A changing landscape: implications of pregnant women’s internet use for childbirth educators. J Perinat Educ. 2007;16:18–24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Ellis L, Roberts L. Exploring the use and quality of Internet discussion forums in pregnancy: A qualitative analysis. Birth. 2020;47:153–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Lupton D. The use and value of digital media for information about pregnancy and early motherhood: a focus group study. BMC Pregnancy Childb. 2016;16:171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Ginja S, Coad J, Bailey E, Kendall S, Goodenough T, Nightingale S, et al. Associations between social support, mental wellbeing, self-efficacy and technology use in first-time antenatal women: data from the BaBBLeS cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childb. 2018;18:441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Collins NL, Dunkel-Schetter C, Lobel M, Scrimshaw SCM. Social support in pregnancy: psychosocial correlates of birth outcomes and postpartum depression. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1993;65:1243–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Morikawa M, Okada T, Ando M, Aleksic B, Kunimoto S, Nakamura Y, et al. Relationship between social support during pregnancy and postpartum depressive state: a prospective cohort study. Sci Rep. 2015;5:10520.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Elsenbruch S, Benson S, Rücke M, Rose M, Dudenhausen J, Pincus-Knackstedt MK, et al. Social support during pregnancy: effects on maternal depressive symptoms, smoking and pregnancy outcome. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:869–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Kim TH, Connolly JA, Tamim H. The effect of social support around pregnancy on postpartum depression among Canadian teen mothers and adult mothers in the maternity experiences survey. BMC Pregnancy Childb. 2014;14:162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Milne SJ, Corbett GA, Hehir MP, Lindow SW, Mohan S, Reagu S, et al. Effects of isolation on mood and relationships in pregnant women during the covid-19 pandemic. Eur J Obstet Gyn R B. 2020;252:610–1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Shorey S, Chan V. Lessons from past epidemics and pandemics and a way forward for pregnant women, midwives and nurses during COVID-19 and beyond: A meta-synthesis. Midwifery. 2020;90: 102821.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Hernandez D, Hinshaw D. As Covid-19 Vaccines Raise Hope, Cold Reality Dawns That Illness Is Likely Here to Stay. J Med. 2021. https://www.namd.org/journal-of-medicine/2670-as-covid-19-vaccinesraise-hope-cold-reality-dawns-that-illness-is-likely-here-to-stay.html. Accessed 12 May 2022. 

  71. Shaman J, Galanti M. Will SARS- CoV-2 become endemic? Science. 2020;370(6516):527–9.

  72. Telenti A, Arvin A, Corey L, Corti D, Diamond MS, García-Sastre A, et al. After the pandemic: perspectives on the future trajectory of COVID-19. Nature. 2021;596:495–504.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable. This study was supported by the Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health (NIH), grant number DP5OD026420

Funding

This study was funded by the Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health (NIH), under grant number DP5OD026420. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the view of the NIH.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Blockley Hall, 423 Guardian Drive, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA

    Rebekah Choi, Ashwini Nagappan, Deena Kopyto & Anna Wexler

Authors
  1. Rebekah Choi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ashwini Nagappan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Deena Kopyto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Anna Wexler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

AN, AW, and RC designed the study. AN, DK, and RC collected data. All authors were involved in analysis and interpretation. RC, AW and AN wrote and revised the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Wexler.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Because data used in this study were obtained from publicly available sources, this study did not meet the regulatory definition of research with human subjects. It was therefore exempted from review by the University of Pennsylvania’s Institutional Review Board.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1: Table S1

. Subtopics and sample posts for all additional topics listed in Figure 1 but not depicted in Tables 1-5, submitted as .pdf file.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Choi, R., Nagappan, A., Kopyto, D. et al. Pregnant at the start of the pandemic: a content analysis of COVID-19-related posts on online pregnancy discussion boards. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 22, 493 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04802-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04802-z

Keywords

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

ISSN: 1471-2393

Contact us