Skip to main content

The impact of assisted reproductive technology in twin pregnancies complicated by intrahepatic cholestasis: a five-year retrospective study

Abstract

Background

Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy is one of the common complications during pregnancy, and ursodeoxycholic acid has been recommended as the first-line drug. However, if the assisted reproductive technology may increase adverse perinatal outcomes of twin pregnancies complicated by intrahepatic cholestasis is disputed, we aimed to investigate perinatal outcomes between twin pregnancies by assisted reproductive technology versus spontaneous conception, based on these women accepted ursodeoxycholic acid treatment.

Methods

From January 2014 to January 2019, we retrospectively analysed the clinical data of twin pregnant women with intrahepatic cholestasis, excluding those who did not receive ursodeoxycholic acid treatment. In total, 864 women were included, among whom 500 conceived by assisted reproductive technology and 364 conceived by spontaneous conception. The primary assessment for perinatal outcomes included premature birth, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, low Apgar score, neonatal intensive care unit and still birth, and secondary indicators were serum bile acid and liver enzymes level during medication, so we also finished subgroup analysis based on different elevated bile acid level and drug usage. The statistical analysis was performed by SPSS 22.0.

Results

The study demonstrated that compared to spontaneous conception, assisted reproductive technology conceived twin pregnancies diagnosed as intrahepatic cholestasis earlier (p = 0.003), and lower birth weight (p = 0.001), less incidence of preterm delivery (p = 0.000) and neonatal intensive care unit admission (p = 0.001), but the rate of meconium-stained amniotic fluid, low Apgar score and still birth have no statistic differences. Moreover, the subgroup analysis showed no significant difference in elevated bile acid levels and medication between assisted reproductive technology and spontaneous conception groups.

Conclusions

The assisted reproductive technology may increase the risk of early-onset intrahepatic cholestasis in twin pregnancies, but it does not seem to increase adverse effects on bile acid levels and perinatal outcomes. Regardless of ursodeoxycholic acid used alone or combination, the effect of bile acid reduction and improving perinatal outcomes in twin pregnancies is limited. Our conclusions still need more prospective randomized controlled studies to confirm.

Peer Review reports

Background

Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) is clinically characterized as pruritus, elevated serum aminotransferase, and total bile acid level (TBA ≥ 10 μmol/L), and those symptoms can quickly resolve after delivery [1]. The etiology and pathogenesis of ICP are not fully understood, relevant factors may involve genetics, hormones, or the environment, pregnant women have advanced maternal age, preexisting hepatobiliary disease, previous history, and multiple gestations are at particular risk for cholestasis of pregnancy [2, 3]. In addition, TBA ≥ 40 μmol/L, gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, and other comorbidities are associated with adverse perinatal outcomes in ICP [4].

Compared with normal pregnancy, adverse perinatal outcomes may more likely occur in ICP, mainly including still birth, meconium-stained amniotic fluid (MSAF), neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), spontaneous and iatrogenic preterm birth [5,6,7]. The still birth rate beyond 37 weeks of gestation attributable to ICP is approximately 1.2%, so active perinatal management is crucial to prevent unpredictable still births [8]. Several drugs could be used for ICP, Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) has been recommended as a first-line agent to reduce serum bile acid levels and relieve itching symptoms. UDCA has few side effects and is safe for the fetus, and S-adenosyl methionine (SAMe) could be an alternative or combination therapy [9,10,11]. For pregnant women who failed UDCA alone, someone researchers found rifampicin may produce a synergistic effect with UDCA, and could promote the conversion and excretion of bile acids, further improving liver function and reducing bile acid levels [12].

Even though medication helps improve laboratory abnormalities, it is still uncertain whether it could reduce adverse perinatal outcomes [13, 14], so someone begins to question aggressive UDCA usage for women with mild TBA levels [15, 16] or try to find more predictable indicators for adverse perinatal outcomes in ICP [11]. The varied incidence of ICP is 0.3%–5.6% among pregnant women, but it could be 20.9% ~ 24.6% during twin pregnancies because ART has been widely applied in infertile women [17,18,19]. Compared to spontaneous pregnancy, it has not been confirmed that if ART conceived twins may develop a higher incidence of adverse perinatal outcomes [20,21,22]. The present study was based on evaluating UDCA treatment by subgroup analysis and aimed to determine whether ART is associated with adverse outcomes during twin pregnancies with ICP.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included twin pregnancies diagnosed as ICP delivering after 28 gestational weeks, from January 1st, 2014 to January 31st, 2019. First, twin pregnancies with ICP were searched by the 10th International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) code, and excluding pregnant women unmatched diagnosis or untreated, clinical data of all included cases were abstracted from the computerized medical records system. Every ICP patient was reconfirmed to have a fasting serum TBA level > 10 μmol/L, with or without pruritus and elevated aminotransferases, and no additional diseases that may cause similar symptoms or laboratory abnormalities. According to the Chinese Guidelines, twin pregnancies with mild serum TBA levels (< 40 μmol/L) must be managed as severe ICP. All women have accepted oral UDCA treatment. Other drugs, such as S-adenosyl methionine (SAMe) or polyunsaturated phosphatidylcholine (PPC), could also be combined with UDCA if necessary, and termination of pregnancy will not exceed 37 weeks (Fig. 1) [23].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow chart shows detailed inclusion process

The data collection was anonymously analysed between women conceived by ART and SC. First, we compared baseline characteristics in the two groups, including age, BMI, twin chorionicity, scarred uterus, gestational complications such as placenta previa, placental abruption, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), preeclampsia, premature rupture of membrane (PROM), and twin comorbidities including twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS), selective intrauterine growth restriction (sIUGR), and twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence (TRAPS). The primary assessment is perinatal outcomes, including gestational age (GA) at delivery, cesarean delivery, birth weight, meconium-stained amniotic fluid (MSAF), Apgar score < 7 at 5 min, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, and still-birth rate. In addition, the effect of UDCA treatment is secondary assessment, so we analysed different elevated TBA levels and drug usage by subgroup analysis, and compared therapeutic outcomes based on changing trends of TBA. Liver enzymes during medication, mainly alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) have also has been compared.

Statistical analyses

Statistical analysis was performed by SPSS for Windows version 22.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). Continuous variables are presented as medians (interquartile ranges) because they did not conform to a normal distribution, and categorical variables are expressed as frequency n (%). Then, Kruskal–Wallis or chi-square test was used to compare the ART and SC groups. A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

From January 1st, 2014 to January 31st, 2019, the incidence of ICP was 5.85% (3380 of 57,815) in a singleton pregnancy, and 21.9% (903 of 4,132) in twin pregnancies by searching for ICD-10. After the exclusion of 39 twin pregnancies not diagnosed or untreated ICP by correction, a total of 864 twin pregnancies were included, 500 women in the ART group and 364 in the SC group. Figure 1 is presented as a detailed inclusion process.

The baseline characteristics are presented in Table 1. The median pregestational BMI [21.4 (20.0–23.4) vs 21.0 (19.5–22.8), p = 0.005] and ratio of advanced maternal age (26.4% vs 13.2%, p = 0.001) in the ART group were higher than SC group. There were more maternal complications in the ART group, including placenta previa (7.4% vs 2.7%, p = 0.003) and GDM (34.4% vs 23.9%, p = 0.001), but fewer scarred uteri (3.8% vs 14.8%, p = 0.001) and PROMs (13.4% vs 21.4%, p = 0.002) than in the SC group. There was no significant difference between the two groups, including placental abruption (2.4% vs 1.1%, p = 0.161), preeclampsia (65% vs 66.2%, p = 0.712), dichorionic twins (35% vs 31.9%, p = 0.803) and twin comorbidities (16.8% vs 22.0%, p = 0.55), such as twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS), selective intrauterine growth restriction (sIUGR), and twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence (TRAPS).

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the study groups

Subgroup analysis displayed in Table 2, there was no statistic difference on serum TBA levels between ART and SC group, including TBA at diagnosis of ICP (p = 0.58), TBA peak(p = 0.103) and TBA at delivery(p = 0.211), but the median level of ALT [140.0(60.0 ~ 241.5) vs153.50(80.0 ~ 286.7), p = 0.021], AST [102.0(51.0 ~ 185.0) vs 118.00(63.2 ~ 193.0), p = 0.017] in the ART group was lower than SC group. Although more patients in the ART group accepted UDCA treatment with double combinations (82% vs 73.9%, P = 0.075) or triple combinations (64.1% vs 61.5%, p = 0.588), there were no significant differences in therapeutic outcome (inefficacy rate 47.2% vs 47.0%, improvement rate 30.4% vs 31.6%, remission rate 22.4% vs 21.4%, p = 0.926) between the two groups.

Table 2 Biochemical indicators and medication in the study groups

Perinatal outcomes are shown in Table 3. Compared with the SC group, the incidence of preterm delivery was lower in the ART group (GA at delivery < 34 weeks, 13.2% vs 21.7%, GA at delivery ≥ 34, < 37 weeks,69.0% vs 68.2%, P = 0.000), the median birth weight in the ART group was higher [2280.0 (1950.0 ~ 2520.0) vs 2140.0 (1815.0 ~ 2420.0), p = 0.001], and the NICU admission rate was significantly lower (37.2% vs 52.4%, p = 0.001). Other neonatal outcomes, including the rate of cesarean delivery (91.4% vs 88.2%,p = 0.119), MSAF (12.2% vs 15.6%, P = 0.121), still-birth (1.4% vs 1.1%, p = 0.697) and Apgar score < 7 at 5 min (2.1% vs 2.0%, p = 0.919), were not significantly different.

Table 3 Main perinatal outcomes of the study groups

Discussion

ICP is one of the main complications during pregnancy, and the incidence during twin pregnancies is higher than that during singleton pregnancy because of widely used ART, but there is no conclusion regarding whether ART may significantly increase adverse perinatal outcomes in ICP [6, 19, 22]. Moreover, UDCA has always been recommended for reducing bile acid, but controversy remains if it could improve perinatal outcomes in twin pregnancies with ICP [2]. Our study found that although women conceived by ART may increase the risk of early-onset ICP, it may not increase adverse perinatal outcomes in comparison with spontaneous conceptions. To evaluate the therapeutic effect of UDCA by subgroup analysis, we also found that UDCA may not improve the perinatal outcomes of twin pregnancies.

The wide application of ART has increased the risk of multiple pregnancies, and maternal complications during twin pregnancies such as preeclampsia, intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, gestational diabetes, and twin comorbidities, also more frequently occur [24], so the correlation between ART and perinatal outcomes has gained much attention. When compared to SC, current studies agree that ICP develops earlier and has a higher rate in ART-conceived singleton and twin pregnancies [25, 26]. However, uncertainty remains regarding whether ART may lead to adverse pregnancy outcomes in twin pregnancies of ICP [27]. Yang finished a multicenter retrospective analysis from 14 provinces and 39 different hospitals, and a total of 112,403 deliveries of singleton and twin pregnancies were included. Their study suggested that ART pregnancy may increase preterm delivery, increase low birth weight and low 5-min Apgar, also increase the rate of neonatal death [25]. Similarly, another retrospective analysis showed that even after adjusting for early-onset ICP and chorionicity, in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) may increase premature delivery and neonatal asphyxia [28]. Our study also demonstrated that ART may increase the risk of early-onset ICP in twin pregnancies, but it seems not to increase low 5-min Apgar and MSAF, even has a lower incidence of preterm delivery, lower newborn weight, and NICU admission, which is opposite to previous investigations. A possible reason may be explained, previous studies have not evaluated drug usage and therapeutic effects concurrently, but we only included women who accepted UDCA treatment.

Current guidelines recommend that pregnant women diagnosed with severe ICP should be managed actively because TBA ≥ 40 μmol/L has an increased risk for adverse perinatal outcomes, especially stillbirth [5, 29]. For twin pregnancies, women with TBA < 40 μmol/L should also be diagnosed with severe ICP according to Chinese guidelines, so most of the women in our study had mildly elevated TBA but were regarded as severe ICP. However, Cui found that women with bile acids greater than 40 μmol/L have no increased incidence of stillbirth but increased iatrogenic preterm delivery [5]. Ovadia performed meta-analyses to identify that the risk of stillbirth is significantly increased when women have serum bile acids of 100 μmol/L or more, but they both concluded in singleton pregnancy [7]. The corrected stillbirth rate in our study was approximately 1.2% (11/864), excluding known reasons such as fetal malformation, twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS), and abnormal umbilical cord. Among those stillbirths, only half of them had serum bile acids beyond 40 μmol/L. Moreover, the present study showed that the rate of preterm delivery between 34 ~ 37 gestational weeks was almost 68% ~ 69%, which may result from active termination of twin pregnancies despite an elevated TBA level of less than 40 umol/L. These conclusions mean that active management by obstetricians may contribute to decreasing stillbirth in severe ICP, but the prevalence of iatrogenic preterm delivery also needs to be given more attention.

Pharmacologic treatment for ICP aims to reduce maternal pruritus or adverse perinatal outcomes, and some meta-analyses have reported UDCA benefits in relieving pruritus and improving laboratory abnormalities, Currently, it is the first-line agent for ICP and without known adverse effects on the fetus [30, 31]. S-adenosyl-methionine (SAMe) and cholestyramine can also be considered alternative drugs for patients who cannot take UDCA or have continued symptoms on the maximum dosage of UDCA. Another Chinese drug named polyene phosphatidylcholine capsules (PPCs) has also been reported to reduce liver enzymes. Despite aggressive medication for ICP, it does not seem to improve pregnancy outcomes. A meta-analysis of thirteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) found that neither UDCA alone nor a drug combination could significantly improve pruritus and perinatal outcomes in both singleton and twin patients [15]. Another multicenter prospective RCT found that compared with placebo, UDCA could not reduce the incidence of stillbirth, preterm delivery, neonatal hospitalization, and other adverse outcomes in patients with ICP, suggesting that the routine usage of UDCA for women with mild ICP should be reassessed [13]. The latest meta-analysis including a total of 34 studies by Ovadia and colleagues shows that the stillbirth rate is approximately 0.7% in ICP patients who underwent UDCA, concluding that UDCA has no significant effect on the prevalence of stillbirth, but it has the opposite result of a lower still-birth rate (0.2%) when considering only randomized controlled trials [14]. Our study only included women who had taken UDCA when diagnosed with ICP, almost 82% of them plus taking SAMe, and 64% triply using cholestyramine, but subgroup analysis showed no differences in serum TBA levels and stillbirth rate.

Our study has some strengths. It included a large sample size of twin pregnancies with ICP. All women included accepted medication, and the drug usage and serum TBA levels during medication were also compared. In addition, every case of data collection from medical records was redefined by diagnostic criteria. This study still has some limitations. First, it is a retrospective analysis that may be prone to selection bias. Second, a higher rate of placenta previa and PROM appears in ART conceived women, which may affect pregnancy outcomes. Third, even though preterm delivery was compared as the main result, iatrogenic preterm birth was not been analysed separately. Fourth, neonatal long-term outcomes were not assessed.

Conclusion

In conclusion, ART-conceived twin pregnancies have a higher risk of early-onset ICP, but it seems to have no association with adverse perinatal outcomes. For twin pregnancies complicated with elevated bile acids, the UDCA used for improving perinatal outcomes was limited. Our conclusions still need more prospective randomized controlled studies to confirm.

Availability of data and materials

The data of study are not publicly available due to ethical and legal restrictions. However, upon request, data may be available from Institutional Review Board of West China Second Hospital of Sichuan University.

Abbreviations

ICP:

Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy

ART:

Assisted reproductive technology

SC:

Spontaneous conception

TBA:

Total bile acid

ALT:

Alanine aminotransferase

AST:

Aspartate aminotransferase

UDCA:

Ursodeoxycholic acid

MSAF:

Meconium stained amniotic fluid

NICU:

Neonatal intensive care unit

References

  1. Williamson C, Geenes V. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124(1):120–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Batsry L, Zloto K, Kalter A, Baum M, Mazaki-Tovi S, Yinon Y. Perinatal outcomes of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy in twin versus singleton pregnancies: is plurality associated with adverse outcomes? Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019;300(4):881–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pataia V, Dixon PH, Williamson C. Pregnancy and bile acid disorders. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2017;313(1):G1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hamalainen ST, Turunen K, Mattila KJ, Kosunen E, Sumanen M. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy and comorbidity: A 44-year follow-up study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019;98(12):1534–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cui D, Zhong Y, Zhang L, Du H. Bile acid levels and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: A meta-analysis. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2017;43(9):1411–20.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kawakita T, Parikh LI, Ramsey PS, Huang CC, Zeymo A, Fernandez M, et al. Predictors of adverse neonatal outcomes in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(4):570.e1-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ovadia C, Seed PT, Sklavounos A, Geenes V, Di Ilio C, Chambers J, et al. Association of adverse perinatal outcomes of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy with biochemical markers: results of aggregate and individual patient data meta-analyses. Lancet. 2019;393(10174):899–909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Henderson CE, Shah RR, Gottimukkala S, Ferreira KK, Hamaoui A, Mercado R. Primum non nocere: how active management became modus operandi for intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;211(3):189–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Marschall H-U. Ursodeoxycholic acid for intrahepatic cholestasis in pregnancy. Lancet. 2019;394(10201):810–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Palmer KR, Xiaohua L, Mol BW. Management of intrahepatic cholestasis in pregnancy. Lancet. 2019;393(10174):853–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Electronic address pso, Lee RH, Mara G, Metz TD, Pettker CM. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #53: Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: Replaces Consult #13, April 2011. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021;224(2):B2–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Geenes V, Chambers J, Khurana R, Shemer EW, Sia W, Mandair D, et al. Rifampicin in the treatment of severe intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015;189:59–63.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chappell LC, Bell JL, Smith A, Linsell L, Juszczak E, Dixon PH, et al. Ursodeoxycholic acid versus placebo in women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (PITCHES): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2019;394(10201):849–60.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ovadia C, Sajous J, Seed PT, Patel K, Williamson NJ, Attilakos G, et al. Ursodeoxycholic acid in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;6(7):547–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shen Y, Zhou J, Zhang S, Wang XL, Jia YL, He S, et al. Is It Necessary to Perform the Pharmacological Interventions for Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy? A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis. Clin Drug Investig. 2019;39(1):15–26.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Triunfo S, Tomaselli M, Ferraro MI, Latartara E, Sassara GM, Carrozza C. Does mild intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy require an aggressive management? Evidence from a prospective observational study focused on adverse perinatal outcomes and pathological placental findings. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022;35(2):212–22.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shan D, Hu Y, Qiu P, Mathew BS, Chen Y, Li S, et al. Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy in Women With Twin Pregnancy. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2016;19(6):697–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mei Y, Gao L, Lin Y, Luo D, Zhou X, He L. Predictors of adverse perinatal outcomes in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy with dichorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;32(3):472–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pacella G, Salsi G, Arcangeli T, Youssef A, Farina A, Bacchi-Reggiani ML, et al. The impact of assisted reproductive technology and chorionicity in twin pregnancies complicated by obstetric cholestasis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(9):1481–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sun L, Zou G, Wei X, Chen Y, Zhang J, Okun N, et al. Clinical outcomes after assisted reproductive technology in twin pregnancies: chorionicity-based comparison. Sci Rep. 2016;6:26869.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Feng C, Li WJ, He RH, Sun XW, Wang G, Wang LQ. Impacts of different methods of conception on the perinatal outcome of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy in twin pregnancies. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):3985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Alemdaroglu S, Yilmaz Baran S, Durdag GD, YukselSimsek S, Yetkinel S, AlkasYaginc D, et al. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: are in vitro fertilization pregnancies at risk? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021;34(15):2548–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rezai S, Lora I, Henderson CE. Severe intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy is a risk factor for preeclampsia in singleton and twin pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(6):877.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rissanen AS, Jernman RM, Gissler M, Nupponen I, Nuutila ME. Maternal complications in twin pregnancies in Finland during 1987–2014: a retrospective study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yang X, Li Y, Li C, Zhang W. Current overview of pregnancy complications and live-birth outcome of assisted reproductive technology in mainland China. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(2):385–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Qin J, Liu X, Sheng X, Wang H, Gao S. Assisted reproductive technology and the risk of pregnancy-related complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes in singleton pregnancies: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(1):73-85.e1 (6).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhu L, Zhang Y, Liu Y, Zhang R, Wu Y, Huang Y, et al. Maternal and Live-birth Outcomes of Pregnancies following Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Sci Rep. 2016;6:35141.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Barda G, Gluck O, Mizrachi Y, Bar J. A comparison of maternal and perinatal outcome between in vitro fertilization and spontaneous dichorionic-diamniotic twin pregnancies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;30(24):2974–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Brouwers L, Koster MP, Page-Christiaens GC, Kemperman H, Boon J, Evers IM, et al. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: maternal and fetal outcomes associated with elevated bile acid levels. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(1):100.e1-7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bacq Y, Sentilhes L, Reyes HB, Glantz A, Kondrackiene J, Binder T, et al. Efficacy of ursodeoxycholic acid in treating intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2012;143(6):1492–501.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kong X, Kong Y, Zhang F, Wang T, Yan J. Evaluating the effectiveness and safety of ursodeoxycholic acid in treatment of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: A meta-analysis (a prisma-compliant study). Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(40):e4949.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors want to thank all the pregnant women for their involvement to this study.

Ethic statement

The authors confirm that all methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations along with ethical approval statement and informed consent to participation.

Funding

This study was supported by the Sichuan Provincial Health Commission (grant no 21PJ053), and the Sichuan Provincial Department of Science and Technology, QZ is responsible for the two fundings.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Design of the work: XL. Data collection: QZ. Data analysis and interpretation: YX and YG. Drafting and critical revision of the article: QZ and XL. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yunhui Gong or Xinghui Liu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The current study was reviewed and qualified as an exemption by the Institutional Review Board of West China Second Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (number 2021067). Trial registration: 2021067. Registered June 1 2021. http://www.motherchildren.com. All study participants provided an informed written consent included the records of hospital.

Consent for publication

Consent to publish clinical details of the mothers and babies included in the current study was obtained from the mothers.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Q., Xu, Y., Gong, Y. et al. The impact of assisted reproductive technology in twin pregnancies complicated by intrahepatic cholestasis: a five-year retrospective study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 22, 269 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04610-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04610-5

Keywords

  • Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy
  • Twin pregnancies
  • Ursodeoxycholic acid
  • Assisted reproductive technology
  • Spontaneous conception