Skip to main content

Safety and efficacy of preoperative tranexamic acid in reducing intraoperative and postoperative blood loss in high-risk women undergoing cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial

A Correction to this article was published on 07 November 2022

This article has been updated

Abstract

Background

Objective to assess the value of preoperative tranexamic acid (TXA) in reduction of intraoperative and postoperative blood loss in high-risk cesarean delivery (CD).

Methods

A double blind randomized controlled trial included 160 high risk women who underwent elective lower segment CD. They were equally randomized to receive either 1 g of TXA or placebo 15 min before surgery. The primary outcome was Intraoperative blood loss.

Results

The estimated blood loss was significantly higher in the placebo group when compared to TXA group (896.81 ± 519.6 vs. 583.23 ± 379.62 ml, P < 0.001).

Both postoperative hemoglobin and hematocrit were lower (9.2 ± 1.6 and 27.4 ± 4.1 vs. 10.1 ± 1.2 and 30.1 ± 3.4, P values < 0.001and 0.012 respectively) and their change percentages (15.41 vs. 7.11%, P < 0.001) were higher in the placebo group when compared to TXA one.

The need for further ecbolics was higher in placebo group when compared to TXA group (46.25 vs. 13.75%, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Preoperative TXA is safe and effective in reducing blood loss during and after high-risk CD.

Trial registration

ClincalTrial.gov ID: NCT03820206.

Peer Review reports

Synopsis

Preoperative administration of tranexamic acid is safe and effective in reducing intraoperative and postoperative blood loss during and after high risk CS.

Introduction

Cesarean delivery (CD) is the most common major operation performed worldwide. The rates of CD increased from less than 10% before the 1980s to more than 30% in the last decade in many developed countries [1].

CD is associated with 2-fold increase in maternal morbidity compared with vaginal delivery [2].

Morbidities include infection, hemorrhage, thromboembolism, and anesthetic complications [3].

Obstetrical hemorrhage, hypertension and infection constitute the triad of maternal death causes [4].

Intraoperative and postoperative maternal hemorrhage are the main operative complications associated with high-risk CD. Anterior placenta previa, multiple pregnancies, and severe pre-eclampsia are all associated with a high risk of major PPH requiring immediate blood transfusion [1].

Many uterotonics as oxytocin, ergometrine and prostaglandins especially misoprostol were tested to minimize both intraoperative and postoperative. Bleed loss during and after CD [5].

Antifibrinolytic agents as tranexamic acid (TXA) were effective in prevention of bleeding complications with few side effects in various conditions [6]. WOMAN Trial Collaborators study proved that the use of TXA in women with postpartum hemorrhage had a large survival benefit [7]. TXA could decrease blood loss during surgery by almost 1/3 when compared to placebo [8].

TXA is a synthetic derivative of lysine with antifibrinolytic action. It blocks lysine binding sites on plasminogen molecules, preventing its interaction with formed plasmin and fibrin resulting in prevention of plasminogen activation with subsequent steadying of the preformed fibrin plug resulted from secondary hemostasis [9].

TXA was counted in WHO Model List of Essential Medicines [10] after confirmation of its ability to reduce mortality in trauma patients suffering from bleeding when administered early [11].

The use of TXA to reduce blood loss during and after surgery is routine nowadays in many procedures as coronary artery bypass, orthopedic and urological surgeries [12].

In obstetrics, TXA is used to treat pregnancy-related bleeding as threatened abortion, placenta previa and postpartum hemorrhage, [13].

Some studies proved the effectiveness of TXA in reducing blood loss during and after CD [14,15,16]. However, none of them targeted high risk CD.

The aim of our study is to investigate the safety and efficacy of preoperative TXA for the reduction of blood loss during and after elective lower-segment cesarean delivery to reduce intraoperative blood loss in high-risk lower segment cesarean sections.

Materials and method

This study is a prospective, double-blinded, randomized placebo-controlled one that was conducted between January 31, 2019, and December 15, 2019 at Kasr alAiny maternity hospital, Cairo University. All participating women have signed an informed written consent after explaining the risks and benefits of the study. The consents were signed after approval of the kasr Alainy ethical committee. The trial was registered at clinical trial registry on January 29, 2019. NCT03820206.

All participants were scheduled for elective lower segment Cesarean section with their age ranged between 20 and 40 years old and gestational age between completed 37 and 41 weeks. All participants had one or more high risk for increased intraoperative blood loss. The risk factors included women with overdistended uterus (e.g. multiple gestation, macrosomic fetus > 4500 g or polyhydramnios with amniotic fluid index > 24), placenta previa, anemia and those who received intraoperative blood transfusion during prior CS.

Exclusion criteria included women with previous history of thromboembolic events, allergy to tranexamic acid and those with morbidly adherent placenta.

Women who were expected to encounter intraoperative complications as visceral injuries were also excluded from the study.

All participants were carefully evaluated through full history, general and abdominal examination to evaluate the risk factors properly and ensure adherence to our inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Obstetric ultrasound was done before surgery to assess the fetal age and maturity, placental location and amniotic fluid. Routine laboratory investigation were done including complete blood count and coagulation profile.

At the same surgical day, participants were equally randomized using computer-generated random numbers to one of the 2 groups. The anesthesiologist, obstetric surgeon, participants and outcome assessor were all blinded.

Fifteen minutes before surgery, women in the active group received 1 g (10 ml) of tranexamic acid (Kapron, Amoun, Egypt; diluted in 20 mL of glucose 5% while women in the control group received 30 mL of glucose 5%. Tranexamic acid ampoules were stored at 15–20 °C temperature in a dry contained. Both solutions were injected slowly over a period of 5 min [16].

All CS were done under regional anesthesia by obstetric surgeon with 5 or more years’ experience in obstetric management. The same technique was used in all women. Pfannenstiel incision, transverse lower segment uterine incision, Cord clamping immediately after fetal extraction, uterine exteriorization, two layers repair of the uterine incision and layered closure of the abdominal wall were done in all women. All women were followed up for 48 h.

After fetal extraction, all participants received a combination of intravenous 5 IU oxytocin (Syntocinon, Novartis, Basel, Switzerland) and intramuscular 0.2 mg ergometrine (Methergine, Novartis, Basel, Switzerland) followed by intravenous drip of 20 IU oxytocin diluted in 500 mL lactated Ringer’s solution with a rate of 125 mL/h).

All women have instructed to report any manifestations of thromboembolism. Reexamination for all participants was done after 1 and 4 weeks after discharge.

We calculated the intraoperative blood loss by taking the mean of the 2 famous methods of estimation. The first one was done through the formula Blood loss equals estimated blood volume (EBV) × preoperative hematocrit−postoperative hematocrit divided by preoperative hematocrit [17].

While the second one was through the weight difference of the dressings and towels before and after the operation added to the fluid volume inside the suction apparatus [5].

Intraoperative blood loss was the primary outcome parameter. Other outcomes included the need for further ecbolics, the need of intraoperative blood transfusion and occurrence of any side effects as thromboembolism.

Sample size was calculated using estimated intraoperative blood loss as the primary outcome. Elsedeek [18] reported the Mean ± SD postpartum blood loss as 324 ± 167 ml in the control group. Considering a 25% reduction in the postpartum blood loss, 100 women in the experimental group and 100 in the control were needed to reject the null hypothesis that the population means of the experimental and control groups are equal with probability (power) 0.95. Due to limited resources, recruitment was stopped after 160 participants had been included. Post-hoc sample size calculation using the same parameters showed that 80 participants in each group allowed for a power of 0.9. The Type I error probability associated with this test of this null hypothesis is 0.05. Sample size calculation was done using G*Power software version 3.1.2.11.

Data were coded and entered using SPSS version 25 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). Data were described using mean ± SD, median, range for numerical data, and number and percentage for categorical data.

Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests were used to compare numerical variables and χ2 test was used to compare categorical data, P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

We assessed 186 women evaluated, 160 were randomized to one of the 2 groups (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Consort flow chart

No statistical difference was found between women subjected to TXA and those subjected to placebo regarding maternal age, weight, gestational age or mode of previous delivery (Table 1).

Table 1 Demographic and clinical characteristicsa

Placenta previa was the commonest risk factor in both groups followed by fetal macrosomia and anemia (Table 1).

The duration of the operation, neonatal birth weight, Parameters of neonatal outcomes named Apgar 1 min, Apgar 5 min and neonatal ICU admission were statistically not different between the 2 study groups (Table 1).

The estimated blood loss was significantly higher in the placebo group when compared to TXA group (P < 0.001) (Table 2).

Table 2 Estimated blood loss, hemoglobin, hematocrit, platelet count, and need for ecbolicsa

Both postoperative hemoglobin and hematocrit were lower and their change percentages were higher in the placebo group when compared to TXA one (Table 2).

The need for further ecbolics was higher in placebo group when compared to TXA group (P < 0.001) (Table 2).

The need for intraoperative blood transfusion was more in placebo group compared to TXA one. However, the difference didn’t reach statistical significance (P 0.071) (Table 2).

Discussion

The results of our study clearly demonstrated the ability of preoperative TXA to minimize intraoperative blood loss during high risk CD.

Placental separation during delivery is associated with powerful myometrial contractions, enhanced platelet activity, release of coagulation factors and increase of fibrinolytic activity (which continues for 6–10 h after delivery [19].

According to these facts, TXA can reduce blood loss after delivery regardless its mode through its fibrinolytic activity.

In our study, TXA significantly decreased intraoperative blood loss from 896.81 ± 519.6 in those who didn’t receive the drug to 583.23 ± 379.62 in women who received it.

Previous studies demonstrated the ability of TXA to decrease blood loss associated with CD.

Maged and colleagues in 2015 found in a RCT that 1 g of TXA could decrease blood loss in full term women who underwent elective lower segment CD from 700.3 ± 143.9 mL in control women to 459.4 ± 75.4 mL with only 6 participants had blood loss > 1000 mL. None of them was in TXA group. They didn’t report any side effects through 4 weeks follow up duration [16].

The reduction in blood loss was confirmed in another 2 studies [20, 21].

A large multicenter, double-blinded RCT, 4431 pregnant women who underwent CD were randomized to receive 1 g of TXA or placebo. Postpartum hemorrhage was reported in 26.7% (556/2086) and 31.6% (653/2067) in TXA and placebo group respectively adjusted risk ratio, 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75 to 0.94; P = 0.003). The rate of PPH was higher than the usual reported rates which may br related to the distribution of different risk factors. They concluded that TXA lowered the incidence of postpartum hemorrhage and the rate of red cell transfusion by day 2 but didn’t lower the hemorrhage related secondary outcomes named the use of additional uterotonic agents, and postpartum blood transfusion [22].

Both Sentürk and colleagues in 2013 [23] and Yehia and associates [24] confirmed the efficacy of TXA to reduce blood loss during CD without reporting any thromboembolic, gastrointestinal, or allergic complications. Similar findings were reported by Yang et al. [25] after vaginal delivery.

One meta-analysis included 104 studies confirmed the efficacy of TXA to decrease postoperative blood loss. However, that decrease was different according to the type of surgery and the time of TXA administration [8].

Another meta-analysis that included 34 articles only five of them were RCT and the rest was either observational (7) or case reports (22) also confirmed the efficacy of TXA to decrease blood loss. However, it reported pulmonary embolism in 2 cases without confirming the relation of these events to administration of TXA [26].

According to our findings, the percentage of change between preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin and hematocrit were significantly lower in women who received TXA when compared to control women (7.34 and 7.11 vs. 16.36 and 15.41 respectively).

In addition to the ability of TXA to decrease intraoperative blood loss, it markedly decreased the need for further ecbolics from 46.25 to 13.75%.

Similar decrease in the need for additional uterotonic drugs after administration of TXA was reported by Gungorduk and colleagues in 2011 [15].

We also demonstrated the ability of TXA to decrease the need of intraoperative blood transfusion from 6.25 to 1.25%. However, this difference didn’t reach a statistical significance. We believe that a larger sample size can detect a significant difference.

To the best of our knowledge, our study is the first RCT to evaluate the effect of TXA on blood loss during high-risk CD. It was double blind with properly calculated sample size. We believe that larger sample size could demonstrate additional benefits as need for transfusion. We used 2 methods to evaluate blood loss both the most common and most accurate methods. The main limitation of our study was the short follow up duration as the long term maternal and neonatal effects of the drug cannot be assessed.

The beneficial effects of TXA in reducing intraoperative and postoperative blood loss should be titrated against its side effects and risks. A future RCT with adequate sample size and long follow up is recommended to establish its value and whether it should be used routinely in high-risk women or in special population only.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Change history

References

  1. Eric Jauniaux and Vincenzo Berghella. The modern caesarean section. In Textbook of Caesarean Section. Eric Jauniaux and William A. Grobman (eds.). 1st. 2016. Chapter 4 . 49–68. Oxford University Press 2016 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX2 6DP.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Villar J, Carroli G, Zavaleta N, et al. Maternal and neonatal individual risks and benefits associated with caesarean delivery: multicentre prospective study. BMJ. 2007;335:1025.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Hawkins JL, Chang J, Palmer SK, et al. Anesthesia-related maternal mortality in the United States: 1979–2002. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117(1):69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. De Greve M, Van Mieghem T, Van Den Berghe G, et al. Obstetric admissions to the intensive care unit in a tertiary hospital. Gynecol Obstet Investig. 2016;81(4):315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Maged AM, Fawzi T, Shalaby MA, Samy A, Rabee MA, Ali AS, et al. A randomized controlled trial of the safety and efficacy of preoperative rectal misoprostol for prevention of intraoperative and postoperative blood loss at elective cesarean delivery. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2019;147:102–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chornenki NLJ, Um KJ, Mendoza PA, et al. Risk of venous andarterial thrombosis in non-surgical patients receiving systemic tranexamic acid: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Thromb Res. 2019;179:81–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. WOMAN Trial Collaborators. Effect of early tranexamic acid administration on mortality, hysterectomy, and other morbidities in women with post-partum haemorrhage (WOMAN): an international, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2017;389:2105–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ker K, Prieto-Merino D, Roberts I. Systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression of the effect of tranexamic acid on surgical blood loss. Br J Surg. 2013;100(10):1271–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cai J, Ribkoff J, Olson S, et al. The many roles of tranexamic acid: an overview of the clinical indications for TXA in medical and surgical patients. Eur J Haematol. 2020;104:79–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Guerriero C, Cairns J, Perel P, Shakur H, Roberts I. CRASH 2 trial collaborators. Costeffectiveness analysis of administering tranexamic acid to bleeding trauma patients using evidence from the CRASH-2 trial. PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e18987.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. CRASH-2 collaborators. The importance of early treatment with tranexamic acid in bleeding trauma patients: an exploratory analysis of the CRASH-2 randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2011;377(9771):1096–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Brown RS, Thwaites BK, Mongan PD. Tranexamic acid is effective in decreasing postoperative bleeding and transfusions in primary coronary artery bypass operations: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 1997;85(5):963–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Novikova N, Hofmeyr GJ, Cluver C. Tranexamic acid for preventing postpartum haemorrhage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;6:CD007872.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gohel M, Patel P, Gupta A, Desai P. Efficacy of tranexamic acid in decreasing blood loss during and after caesarean section: a randomized case controlled prospective study. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2007;57(3):227–30.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gungorduk K, Yildirim G, Asicioğlu O, Gungorduk OC, Sudolmus S, Ark C. Efficacy of intravenous tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss after elective cesarean section: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Am J Perinatol. 2011;28(3):233–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Maged AM, Helal OM, Elsherbini MM, Eid MM, Elkomy RO, Dahab S, et al. A randomized placebo-controlled trial of preoperative tranexamic acid among women undergoing elective cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;131(3):265–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.05.027.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Brecher ME, Monk T, Goodnough LT. A standardized method for calculating blood loss. Transfusion. 1997;37(10):1070–4. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1537-2995.1997.371098016448.x PMID: 9354828.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Elsedeek MS. Impact of preoperative rectal misoprostol on blood loss during and after elective cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012;118(2):149–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.03.038 Epub 2012 Jun 13. PMID: 22698700.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shakur H, Elbourne D, Gülmezoglu M, Alfirevic Z, Ronsmans C, Allen E, et al. The WOMAN trial (world maternal Antifibrinolytic trial): tranexamic acid for the treatment of postpartum haemorrhage: an international randomised, double blind placebo controlled trial. Trials. 2010;11:40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Shahid A, Khan A. Tranexamic acid in decreasing blood loss during and after caesarean section. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2013;23(7):459–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Abdel-Aleem H, Alhusaini TK, Abdel-Aleem MA, Menoufy M, Gülmezoglu AM. Effectiveness of tranexamic acid on blood loss in patients undergoing elective cesarean section: randomized clinical trial. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013;26(17):1705–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sentilhes L, Sénat MV, Le Lous M, Winer N, Rozenberg P, Kayem G, et al. Tranexamic Acid for the Prevention of Blood Loss after Cesarean Delivery. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(17):1623–34. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2028788 PMID: 33913639.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sentürk MB, Cakmak Y, Yildiz G, Yildiz P. Tranexamic acid for cesarean section: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013;287(4):641–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yehia AH, Koleib MH, Abdelazim IA, Atik A. Tranexamic acid reduces blood loss during and after cesarean section: a double blinded, randomized, controlled trial. Asian Pac J Reprod. 2014;3(1):53–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yang H, Zheng S, Shi C. Clinical study on the efficacy of tranexamic acid in reducing post-partum blood loss: a randomized, comparative, multicenter trial (in Chinese). Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2001;36(10):590–2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Peitsidis P, Kadir RA. Antifibrinolytic therapy with tranexamic acid in pregnancy and postpartum. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2011;12(4):503–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We all would like to thank all nurses and residents in our teaching hospital for their effective role in this study also we cannot forget the great role of KASRALAINY hospital so many thanks.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Funding

Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB). No funding was obtained for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M A Shalaby: Project development, Data Collection, Manuscript writing. AM Maged: Data analysis, Manuscript writing. A Al-asmar: Project development, manuscript revision. M ElMahy: Data analysis, Data Collection. M Al-Mohamady: Data Collection, Manuscript writing. N M Rund: Manuscript writing, Revision of references. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamed A. Shalaby.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki ethical standards, relevant regulations and guidelines.

All participating women have signed an informed written consent after explaining the risks and benefits of the study. The consents were signed after approval of the kasrAlAiny ethical committee.

The experimental protocol/s was approved by KasrAlAiny ethical committee on September 16, 2018.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

All authors report that there is no competing interests in this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised: the sentence in the Methods beginning "Considering a 25% reduction …" has been amended.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shalaby, M.A., Maged, A.M., Al-Asmar, A. et al. Safety and efficacy of preoperative tranexamic acid in reducing intraoperative and postoperative blood loss in high-risk women undergoing cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 22, 201 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04530-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04530-4

Keywords

  • Tranexamic acid
  • Elective CS
  • Intraoperative blood loss
  • Postpartum hemorrhage
  • High risk CS