Skip to main content

Mode of delivery, perinatal outcome and neurodevelopment in uncomplicated monochorionic diamniotic twins: a single-center retrospective cohort study

Abstract

Background

There is no agreement on the effect of planned mode of delivery in the perinatal morbidity and neurodevelopment in uncomplicated monochorionic diamniotic as well as regarding the safest mode of delivery. In this paper we have aimed to analyze the impact of the mode of delivery in uncomplicated monochorionic diamniotic twins ≥ 32 weeks of gestation.

Material and methods

This study included 72 women, followed and attended at our department, with uncomplicated monochorionic diamniotic pregnancies who had a birth between 32.0 and 37.6 weeks of gestation from January 2012 to December 2018. Outcomes were recorded in women who underwent planned vaginal delivery (induced or spontaneous onset of labor), and women who underwent a planned cesarean section for any reason that excluded vaginal delivery. Primary outcomes included: (1) A composite of any of the following: neonatal death, 5-min Apgar score < 4, respiratory distress syndrome, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, sepsis, periventricular leukomalacia, intraventricular hemorrhage, and necrotizing enterocolitis. (2) Neurodevelopmental status at 2 years of corrected age.

Results

In this period, 42 women (58.3%) had a planned vaginal delivery, and 30 women (41.7%) had a planned cesarean section. In the first group, 64.3% had a vaginal delivery. The rate of successful vaginal delivery was similar regardless the onset of labor. We did not find a higher composite perinatal morbidity in the planned vaginal delivery group (planned vaginal delivery: 3.6% vs. planned cesarean section: 8.3%, aOR 1.36, 95% CI 0.24–7.81). Considering the onset of labor, it was more frequent in the spontaneous subgroup (8.3% vs. 0%). The rate of neurodevelopmental impairment was higher in the planned cesarean section group, without reaching statistical significance [10.2% vs. 4.9%, aOR 1.53 (95% CI 0.37–6.29)].

Conclusions

In uncomplicated monochorionic diamniotic twins at ≥ 32 weeks of gestation, when the first twin is in vertex presentation, our results suggest that planned vaginal delivery is safe, with a successful outcome as well as high vaginal delivery rate.

Peer Review reports

Background

Compared to singleton pregnancies, twin pregnancies are at a higher risk for an adverse perinatal outcome [1,2,3]. Hence, the optimal mode of delivery is a particularly contentious issue. A long-lasting debate keeps the controversy going; while some authors suggest that vaginal delivery is a safe option for uncomplicated twin pregnancies [4,5,6,7], other investigators recommend planned caesarean section (PCS) in order to avoid intrapartum complications, especially those derived from breech extraction [8,9,10].

The dilemma in monochorionic diamniotic (MCDA) twins is greater, as vascular anastomoses between fetal circulations may result in acute and dramatic hemodynamic intrapartum changes [11,12,13]. Even in uneventful monochorionic pregnancies, likelihood of adverse perinatal outcomes is higher compared with singletons and dichorionic twin pregnancies [11, 14, 15].

Although chorionicity has a significant influence on perinatal outcomes, most studies dealing with the mode of delivery in twins do not stratify this topic accordingly [5, 16]. Furthermore, published studies regarding the mode of delivery in MCDA pregnancies do not consider essential outcome issues as induction of labor nor neurodevelopment status [17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. In addition, the results in most reports are based on national databases analysis, which makes data difficult to extrapolate, as far as there are no common and homogeneous obstetric policies. Furthermore, neonatal criteria for defining morbidity are different, and in many cases do not cover all the main complications of MCDA pregnancies.

The purpose of our study has been to analyze perinatal outcomes and 2-year-neurodevelopment status for moderately to late preterm and early term MCDA twins with respect to the mode of delivery, as well as to assess the safety of the induction of labor.

Material and methods

Study design, setting and population

This is a retrospective cohort study conducted at Virgen del Rocío University Hospital of Seville (a tertiary referral center with an average of 6000 births per year), including all uncomplicated MCDA pregnancies who had delivery at 32.0 – 37.6 weeks of gestation from 2012 to 2018. All the pregnancies were followed and assisted in our center, as well as subsequent follow-up up to two years of life, by a homogeneous follow-up protocol throughout the entire study period.

Management protocols for MCDA twins were determined locally following the criteria derived from international guidelines, taking into account their updates during the study period, as those established by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists [25, 26], or the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology [26].

Chorionicity was determined by first-trimester ultrasonography and confirmed after birth by pathological examination. In all cases a detailed anomaly scan was performed at 18.0 – 21.6 weeks. Fetal ultrasound assessment was performed every 2 weeks from 16.0 weeks onwards until delivery. At every ultrasound examination, liquor volume in each of the amniotic sacs, estimated fetal weight, visualization of fetal bladders, middle cerebral artery peak systolic velocity value, as well as the umbilical artery pulsatility index of both fetuses were recorded. In uncomplicated pregnancies, induction of labor is considered from 37.0 to 37.6 weeks, unless other clinical indications for caesarean section. Induction is undertaken using vaginal prostaglandin E2 delivery system. The delivery was attended by at least two senior obstetricians and two neonatologists. Neurodevelopmental assessment was performed in a specific monographic consultation, at least three times in the first two years of life (2, 12 and 24 months of life).

Cases were classified retrospectively by the authors into induced or spontaneous onset of labor (planned vaginal delivery, PVD) or PCS groups depending on delivery method. PVD was considered after 32 weeks of gestation, when there was no contraindication for vaginal delivery (non-vertex first twin, at least two previous CS, weight discordance > 15% when first twin was smaller, vasa previa, and/or any other condition like active herpes genital infection), if twin A was in vertex presentation, and estimated fetal weight was at least 1500 g.

In non-vertex presentation of the second twin, breech extraction was performed when gestational age at delivery was 32 weeks or greater, in the absence of a previous CS, and intertwin weight discordance was less than 15%. PCS was not performed because of maternal request.

Outcomes

We have established a composite of perinatal morbidity as primary outcome, with any of the following: neonatal death, 5-min Apgar score of < 4, respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), sepsis, periventricular leukomalacia (PVL), intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) and necrotizing enterocolitis (NE). 5-min Apgar score of < 7 was registered as well. Like other authors [24], we did not include umbilical cord pH at birth as an outcome, as we found a significant interaction with 5-min Apgar score.

We also analyzed the neurodevelopment status at 2 years of corrected age. For this purpose, we used the revised Brunet-Lézine scale [27]. Infants were classified as having neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI) if they had a global developmental quotient (DQ) on the revised Brunet–Lézine scale of < 85 or level 3 cerebral palsy, and severe NDI was defined with a DQ of < 60.

Enrolment criteria

We successively enrolled all pregnant women with MCDA twins that met the criteria summarized in Table 1. We only included MCDA twin pregnancies when both fetuses were alive after 32 weeks of gestation.

Table 1 Enrolment criteria

Exposures

In our study, prior to labor, pregnant women in which attempted vaginal delivery was clinically allowed were selected and classified as the exposed group (PVD group). Following this, mode of delivery was categorized as PCS or PVD, including spontaneous vaginal vertex deliveries, assisted vaginal birth, breech extraction of the second twin, and emergent cesarean section.

In case of induction of labor, breech extraction, or PCS, an informed consent detailing the risks and benefits of each procedure was explained and signed.

Data source

Data were extracted from the electronic health record. Later, anonymized data analysis was provided by a randomly generated study identifier.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS 25.0 software package (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL), and statistical significance was assumed at P < 0.05. All hypothesis tests were two-sided.

Values were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) since data were normally distributed, and categorical variables were expressed as numbers and percentages. Univariable comparisons of categorical variables were performed using a chi‐squared test or Fisher's exact test. Comparison of normally distributed continuous variables was performed using Student’s T-test, and non-normally distributed variables with the Mann–Whitney U-test. Binary logistic regression models were used to calculate odds ratios (OR), adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). In order to control for major confounders, OR was adjusted for birth weight and gestational age at birth.

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board approval of this study was obtained from the Andalusian Ethical Committee (Spain) on 11 October 2019 (ref. Nº 1318-N-19). The requirement for informed consent was waived because the data were de-identified. The research protocol was submitted to the Andalusian Ethical Committee before starting the collection of data.

Results

Participants characteristics

Over that 6-year period, there were 84 MCDA twin deliveries greater than 32 weeks of gestation of pregnancies who were fully followed-up in our department.

Of those, cases with twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) (n = 5), stillbirth (n = 3), severe preeclampsia (n = 1), severe intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) (n = 2), and gestational age at birth < 32 weeks (n = 5) were excluded from the study (some of the pregnancies shared more than one of the above criteria).

The final analysis included 72 uncomplicated MCDA twin pregnancies: 42 women (58.3%) in the PVD group and 30 women (41.7%) in the PCS group. The flow chart of participant enrolment is shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow chart of participant enrolment

Demographic data, clinical features and neonatal characteristics are summarized in Table 2. No statistically significant differences were found regarding mean gestational age at birth (PVD: 36.2 weeks vs. PCS: 35.3 weeks, P = 0.15). The mean weight at birth was lower in the PCS group, both for the first twin (2,228 g vs. 2,413 g, P = 0.07) and the second one (2,134 g vs. 2,385 g, P = 0.02).

Table 2 Maternal baseline characteristics and delivery data in PVD and PCS groups

Obstetric outcomes in PVD and PCS groups

In the PVD group, 64.3% of women had vaginal delivery. Combined delivery (vaginal delivery of the first twin and intrapartum CS of the second twin) was performed in only one woman (2.4%). Fourteen cases (33.3%) from the PVD group were delivered via emergency CS because of non-reassuring fetal status (n = 7) or labor arrest (n = 7).

For pregnancies assigned to PVD group, 57.1% of pregnancies (24/42) had induction of labor. The main indication of labor induction was to avoid delivery above 37.6 weeks (22/24, 91.7%), followed by prenatal diagnosis of mild IUGR (2/24, 8.3%). 42.9% of pregnancies (18/42) had a spontaneous onset of labor. The rate of successful vaginal delivery was higher in the spontaneous onset of labor subgroup (72.2% vs. 58.3%, p = 0.35).

Perinatal outcomes in PVD and PCS groups

Table 3 lists the incidence of adverse perinatal outcomes in each group. Composite perinatal morbidity was observed in at least one fetus in 3.6% of pregnancies (3/84) in the PVD group, and in 8.3% of pregnancies (5/60) in the PCS group [aOR 1.36 (95% CI 0.24–7.81), P = 0.22]. The rate of composite perinatal morbidity was higher in the PCS group for the second twin [5.0% vs. 2.4%, aOR 3.20 (95% CI 0.16–65.88)], yet these differences did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.16). Composite perinatal morbidity was not observed in the eight cases in which breech extraction of the second twin was performed.

Table 3 Perinatal outcomes and NDI according to the planned mode of delivery (intention to treat)

Due to the low frequency of the different items included in terms of composite perinatal morbidity, we did not find significant differences between the two groups in any of them. No cases resulted in neonatal death in either group.

As secondary outcome, we compared the outcomes respect to the onset of labor when a vaginal delivery was attempted (Table 4). The mean gestational age was significantly lower in the spontaneous delivery group as, following the Department protocol, before 35 weeks no labor induction is performed (35.4 vs. 36.6 weeks, P = 0.001). The rate of composite perinatal morbidity was higher in the spontaneous trial of labor subgroup (8.3% vs. 0%, P = 0.08), although the differences did not reach statistical significance. This is mainly related to an IVH event grade I occurred in both twins born from the same delivery at 34.2 weeks. This IVH event has no impact on 2-years neurodevelopment.

Table 4 Perinatal outcomes and NDI according to the onset of labor in PVD group

Finally, we performed a comparison between the perinatal outcomes of induced onset of labor group vs. PCS group (Table 5), being homogeneous groups in terms of gestational age at delivery and weight at birth. We found a higher composite perinatal morbidity in the PCS group, although without significant differences (8.3% vs. 0%, P = 0.06).

Table 5 Perinatal outcomes and NDI in PCS group compared to induced onset of labor subgroup

2-year-neurodevelopment status

Finally, we studied the neurodevelopment of the children at 2-year-age (Tables 3, 4, 5). Neurodevelopment status data were available for 140 children of the initial cohort: 81 from the PVD group and 59 from the PCS group. Among these infants, NDI rate was slightly higher in the PCS group, without reaching statistical significance [10.2% vs. 4.9%, aOR 1.53 (95% CI 0.37–6.29), P = 0.26].

We found a lower NDI rate in the induced onset group compared to spontaneous onset of labor group (0% vs. 11.8%, P = 0.03), with no events of severe NDI. The rate of NDI was also lower in the induced onset of labor group compared to the PCS group (10.2% vs. 0%, P = 0.03), without reaching significant differences in the appearance of severe NDI events (3.4% vs. 0%, P = 0.50).

Discussion

Main findings

In this study, the results indicated that PVD is not associated with a high risk of adverse perinatal outcomes or NDI at 2 years in uncomplicated MCDA twins. Attempted vaginal delivery seems to be a safe option with a high vaginal delivery rate.

In the PCS group, the composite perinatal morbidity was higher (aOR 1.36, 95% CI 0.24–7.81), also finding a slightly higher rate of NDI at 2 years (10.2% vs. 4.9%) and severe NDI (3.4% vs. 0%).

Regarding the onset of labor in PVD group, induction of labor has been shown to be a safe option when performed above 35 gestational weeks. In our study, we have found a higher perinatal morbidity in the spontaneous trial of labor subgroup, with a higher rate of 2-year-NDI. Nevertheless, the composite perinatal morbidity in both subgroups was lower than in PCS group.

Interpretation and comparison to current literature

MCDA twins are considered to be at highest risk of perinatal morbidity and mortality mainly related to acute hemodynamic intrapartum changes mediated by placental vascular anastomoses [11, 12]. In addition, despite the relevance of chorionicity, most studies addressing the contribution of the mode of delivery in perinatal morbidity have not been stratified accordingly.

To date, only eight studies have taken chorionicity into account when analyzing the optimal mode of delivery in uncomplicated twins, with different designs and neonatal morbidity criteria [17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. The most relevant data of each study are summarized in Table 6. None of them considered the mode of onset of labor nor long-term NDI when attempted vaginal delivery.

Table 6 Selective analysis of uncomplicated MCDA twin delivery in terms of composite perinatal morbidity

Our study shows that attempted vaginal delivery for uncomplicated MCDA twins is a safe management option, and has a low perinatal morbidity rate. These findings are consistent with those reported in the above-mentioned studies. Even though it is not a large sample, the data suggest that in uncomplicated MCDA pregnancies greater than 32.0 weeks of gestation, when first twin is in vertex presentation, PCS does not seem to avoid perinatal adverse events, but rather shows a slight increase in them (aOR 1.36, 95% CI 0.24–7.81).

The gestational age at delivery in pregnancies included in the different studies is highly variable, ranging from 24.0 to 38.6 weeks. In our study, we decided to include only moderate to late preterm births (32.0 – 36.6 weeks) to avoid masking a protective effect of cesarean section in that range of gestational age.

The impact of the mode of delivery in twins on 2-year-neurodevelopment was studied by Asztalos et al. in 2016 [28]. The authors performed a secondary analysis of the Twin Birth Study, a randomized controlled trial designed to compare planned vaginal delivery and PCS [5]. Using the Ages and Stages Questionnaire, the authors conclude that a policy based in PCS provides no benefit to children at 2 years of age [NDI 5.99% vs. 5.83%, OR 1.04 (95% CI 0.77–1.41), P = 0.79]. However, they do not stratify their data in relation to chorionicity. Our study, which takes chorionicity in consideration, yields similar results, showing a slightly higher NDI rate in PCS group. Furthermore, the rate of 2-year-NDI is similar to that reported by other authors when a specific analysis of MCDA pregnancies is performed [29].

Strengths and limitations

The major strength of this study is that all pregnancies included were fully evaluated and delivered in a major single tertiary center, with a long tradition of vaginal delivery and breech extraction of the second twin. Therefore, the results can be extrapolated to centers that meet the same conditions.

To our knowledge, this is the first study considering the mode of onset of labor as well as 2-years-neurodevelopment after structured follow-up in a single institution. Thus, we have been able to define a more detailed and accurate perinatal outcome measures than using registry-based data, even though the study population is not large.

Our study has the limitations of retrospective studies. Also, the sample size may be small to detect low frequency adverse effects.

Conclusion

The main aim of this study has been to provide evidence and support to parents and practitioners when deciding the mode of labor and delivery in uncomplicated MCDA twin gestations greater than 32 weeks.

In uncomplicated monochorionic diamniotic twins at ≥ 32 weeks of gestation, when first twin is in vertex presentation, attempt of vaginal delivery is a safe management option in terms of perinatal morbidity as well as long-term neurodevelopment, with a high vaginal delivery rate.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

aOR:

Adjusted odds ratio

CS:

Cesarean section

MCDA:

Monochorionic diamniotic

NDI:

Neurodevelopmental impairment

PCS:

Planned cesarean section

PVD:

Planned vaginal delivery

References

  1. Ghai V, Vidyasagar D. Morbidity and mortality factors in twins. An epidemiologic approach Clin Perinatol. 1988;15(1):123–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kiely JL. The epidemiology of perinatal mortality in multiple births. Bull N Y Acad Med. 1990;66(6):618–37.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Joseph KS, Allen AC, Dodds L, Vincer MJ, Armson BA. Causes and consequences of recent increases in preterm birth among twins. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98(1):57–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01394-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fox NS, Silverstein M, Bender S, Klauser CK, Saltzman DH, Rebarber A. Active second-stage management in twin pregnancies undergoing planned vaginal delivery in a U.S. population. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115:229–33. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c8b462.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Barrett JF, Hannah ME, Hutton EK, Willan AR, Allen AC, Armson BA, Twin Birth Study Collaborative Group, et al. A randomized trial of planned cesarean or vaginal delivery for twin pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(14):1295–305. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1214939 Erratum in: N Engl J Med. 2013 Dec 12;369(24):2364.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Rossi AC, Mullin PM, Chmait RH. Neonatal outcomes of twins according to birth order, presentation and mode of delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2011;118(5):523–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02836.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schmitz T, Prunet C, Azria E, Bohec C, Bongain A, Chabanier P, et al. Association Between Planned Cesarean Delivery and Neonatal Mortality and Morbidity in Twin Pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129(6):986–95. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002048.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Smith GC, Shah I, White IR, Pell JP, Dobbie R. Mode of delivery and the risk of delivery-related perinatal death among twins at term: a retrospective cohort study of 8073 births. BJOG. 2005;112(8):1139–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00631.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Smith GC, Fleming KM, White IR. Birth order of twins and risk of perinatal death related to delivery in England, Northern Ireland, and Wales, 1994–2003: retrospective cohort study. BMJ. 2007;334(7593):576. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39118.483819.55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Dong Y, Luo ZC, Yang ZJ, Chen L, Guo YN, Branch W, et al. Is Cesarean Delivery Preferable in Twin Pregnancies at >=36 Weeks Gestation? PLoS ONE. 2016;11: e0155692. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155692.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Hack KE, Derks JB, Elias SG, Franx A, Roos EJ, Voerman SK, et al. Increased perinatal mortality and morbidity in monochorionic versus dichorionic twin pregnancies: clinical implications of a large Dutch cohort study. BJOG. 2008;115(1):58–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01556.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Emery SP, Bahtiyar MO, Moise KJ, North American Fetal Therapy Network. The North American Fetal Therapy Network Consensus Statement: Management of Complicated Monochorionic Gestations. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126(3):575–84. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000000994.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sung JH, Kim SH, Kim YM, Kim JH, Kim MN, Lee HR, et al. Neonatal outcomes of twin pregnancies delivered at late-preterm versus term gestation based on chorionicity and indication for delivery. J Perinat Med. 2016;44(8):903–11. https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2015-0401.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee YM, Wylie BJ, Simpson LL, D’Alton ME. Twin chorionicity and the risk of stillbirth. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111(2 pt 1):301–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e318160d65d.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Garabedian C, Poulain C, Duhamel A, Subtil D, Houfflin-Debarge V, Deruelle P. Intrapartum management of twin pregnancies: are uncomplicated monochorionic pregnancies more at risk of complications than dichorionic pregnancies? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015;94(3):301–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12558.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Armson BA, O’Connell C, Persad V, Joseph KS, Young DC, Baskett TF. Determinants of perinatal mortality and serious neonatal morbidity in the second twin. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(3 Pt 1):556–64. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000227747.37184.0a.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sau A, Chalmers S, Shennan AH, Fox G, Maxwell D. Vaginal delivery can be considered in monochorionic diamniotic twins. BJOG. 2006;113(5):602–4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00887.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hack KE, Derks JB, Elias SG, van Mameren FA, Koopman-Esseboom C, Mol BW, et al. Perinatal mortality and mode of delivery in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies ≥ 32 weeks of gestation: a multicenter retrospective cohort study. BJOG. 2011;118(9):1090–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.02955.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hoffmann E, Oldenburg A, Rode L, Tabor A, Rasmussen S, Skibsted L. Twin births: cesarean section or vaginal delivery? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012;91(4):463–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01356.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Weisz B, Hogen L, Yinon Y, Mazaki S, Gindes L, Schiff E, et al. Mode of delivery and neonatal outcome in uncomplicated monochorionic twin pregnancies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25(12):2721–4. https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2012.712560.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yamashita A, Ishii K, Taguchi T, Mabuchi A, Ota S, Sasahara J, et al. Adverse perinatal outcomes related to the delivery mode in women with monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies. J Perinat Med. 2014;42(69):769–75. https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2014-0072.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ylilehto E, Palomäki O, Huhtala H, Uotila J. Term twin birth: Impact of mode of delivery on outcome. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017;96(5):589–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13122.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ylilehto E, Palomäki O, Korhonen P, Huhtala H, Uotila J. Impact of mode of delivery on perinatal outcome in moderately and late preterm twin birth. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020;153(1):106–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13418 Epub ahead of print.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Aviram A, Lipworth H, Asztalos EV, Mei-Dan E, Melamed N, Cao X, et al. Delivery of monochorionic twins: lessons learned from the Twin Birth Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;223(6):916.e1-916.e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2020.06.048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kilby MD, Bricker L, on behalf of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Management of Monochorionic Twin Pregnancy: Green-top Guideline No. 51. BJOG. 2017;124:e1-45. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Khalil A, Rodgers M, Baschat A, Bhide A, Gratacos E, Hecher K, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: role of ultrasound in twin pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;47(2):247–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.15821.Erratum.In:UltrasoundObstetGynecol.2018;52(1):140.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Josse D. Brunet Lezine Révisé: Echelle de développement psychomoteur de la première enfance. Paris, France: Etablissement d’applications psychotechniques, 1997

  28. Asztalos EV, Hannah ME, Hutton EK, Willan AR, Allen AC, Armson BA, et al. Twin Birth Study: 2-year neurodevelopmental follow-up of the randomized trial of planned cesarean or planned vaginal delivery for twin pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(3):371.e1-371.e19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.12.051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ortibus E, Lopriore E, Deprest J, Vandenbussche FP, Walther FJ, Diemert A, et al. The pregnancy and long-term neurodevelopmental outcome of monochorionic diamniotic twin gestations: a multicenter prospective cohort study from the first trimester onward. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200(5):494.e1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2009.01.048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

All persons that contributed to this study are listed authors and meet the criteria for authorship.

Funding

There was no funding for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A.C., L.G., and G.A. contribute to conception and design. A.C. was responsible to acquisition of data. A.C., L.G., and G.A. contribute to analysis and interpretation of data. All authors contribute to drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content. All authors contributed to the write up of the manuscript and approved the final version for submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guillermo Antiñolo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Institutional Review Board approval of this study was obtained from the Andalusian Ethical Committee (Spain) on 11 October 2019 (ref. Nº 1318-N-19). The requirement for informed consent was officially waived because the data were de-identified, and due to the anonymous nature of the data collection process. The research protocol was submitted to the Andalusian Ethical Committee before starting the collection of data. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and other nationally valid relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chimenea, A., García-Díaz, L. & Antiñolo, G. Mode of delivery, perinatal outcome and neurodevelopment in uncomplicated monochorionic diamniotic twins: a single-center retrospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 22, 89 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04425-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04425-4

Keywords