Skip to main content

The association between maternal cytomegalovirus urinary excretion and congenital infection rate



In utero Cytomegalovirus (CMV) vertical transmission occurs predominantly during primary maternal infection. There are no known non-invasive methods for diagnosis of fetal infection before delivery, however some risk factors have been suggested. We aimed to evaluate the association between maternal CMV urinary excretion and congenital CMV infection.


A retrospective cohort study of all women who were diagnosed with primary CMV infection during pregnancy in a single university affiliated tertiary medical center, between 2012 and 2016. We examined congenital CMV infection and disease rates among infants born to women with and without CMV urinary excretion.


Overall, 126 women were included, 77 in the positive urinary excretion group, and 49 in the negative urinary excretion group. There was no difference in maternal symptoms between the groups. We found no difference in congenital CMV infection and disease rates between infants born to women with and without urinary excretion of CMV (congenital infection rate 37.1% vs. 24.4%, p = 0.209, congenital disease rate of 18.2% vs. 22.4%, p = 0.648). Women with positive urinary CMV excretion had lower IgG avidity values (36.7% vs 54.6%, p = 0.007), with no additional difference in serology pattern. Compared to asymptomatic women, those with CMV related symptoms did not have significantly higher rates of urinary excretion of CMV (70% vs. 60.5%, p = 0.38) or congenital infection rates (40.7% vs. 31.2%, p = 0.48).


Among infants of women with primary CMV infection in pregnancy, we did not find an association between urinary excretion of CMV and congenital CMV infection.

Peer Review reports


Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a DNA herpesvirus, established as the most common congenital viral infection, with birth prevalence of approximately 0.5% [1]. Congenital CMV disease is a leading cause of birth defects, developmental disabilities and sensorineural hearing loss [2].

The most important protective factor against congenital CMV infection is preexisting maternal immunity against the virus [3], as is the timing of infection during gestation: the rate of vertical transmission in women with primary CMV infection increases with advancing gestational age [4,5,6,7] - from approximately 40% during first trimester [6] to 73.3% for third trimester maternal infection [7]. Nevertheless, sequelae in the offspring appears to be less severe the later in gestation transmission occurs [8,9,10]. Other than those, several additional risk factors, associated with vertical transmission to the fetus and severity of congenital CMV disease, have been described for both primary and non-primary maternal infections, such as high-risk occupation for viral exposure, and abnormal fetal MRI [11, 12].

Diagnosis of clinically suspected maternal primary CMV infection is based on seroconversion of negative to positive CMV IgG in maternal serum, alongside with determination of IgG avidity, which is frequently necessary in order to establish the estimated timing of the infection [13, 14]. In order to definitively determine fetal infection, the preferred prenatal analysis is PCR for CMV DNA via amniocentesis [15,16,17]. In addition, sonographic monitoring for fetal anomalies that may indicate an affected fetus should be conducted, even though these anomalies are not universally diagnostic nor pathognomonic for CMV disease. In the presence of a positive PCR for CMV DNA, these finding are considered indicative for CMV congenital infection. Despite the abovementioned methods, prediction of CMV congenital infection and disease in an infected mother is limited. For that reason, we sought to investigate the role of maternal urinary CMV excretion in these entities.

The medical literature is sparse as to the association between the presence of CMV DNA in maternal urine and the rate of CMV congenital infection and disease. Delforge et al. [18] investigated a similar question and found a marginal statistically significant correlation between the two, however their study addressed only the association between CMV viruria and congenital infection rate, and did not address other implications of maternal CMV urine excretion. Therefore, the aim of our study was to establish whether maternal CMV urinary excretion is associated with congenital CMV infection and disease.

Materials and methods

Study population

A retrospective cohort study of all pregnant women who visited the CMV clinic in a single university affiliated tertiary medical center, between 2012 and 2016, and were diagnosed with primary CMV infection during pregnancy. Women were categorized according to CMV urinary excretion: positive urinary excretion group and negative urinary excretion group at time of diagnosis. We excluded women who were diagnosed with non-primary CMV infection, periconceptional CMV infection, multiple gestations and women who participated in a parallel interventional trial for CMV prevention. In addition, women who did not undergo amniocentesis or whose neonatal electronic health record did not contain information on CMV urinary analysis, were also excluded.


Primary maternal CMV infection was defined in women who underwent CMV IgG seroconversion, according to their serology analysis prior to and during pregnancy. If prior IgG status was unknown, IgG avidity was measured to ascertain the estimated timing of the infection [13, 14, 19, 20], and to exclude any suspected peri- or pre-conceptional infections. In some women with IgG seroconversion but otherwise borderline serology patterns, maternal symptoms were also taken into account in determination of primary infection. CMV DNA urine excretion analysis was used to stratify women to the abovementioned study groups.

Congenital CMV infection was defined by positive PCR for CMV DNA in amniocentesis that was performed after 21 gestational weeks and at least 7 weeks after the estimated onset of maternal infection (based on serological conversion and IgG avidity) [21], or by detection of CMV in neonatal urine analysis, which was performed immediately after birth. Congenital CMV disease was defined for any fetus with sonographic or MRI findings that are considered suggestive of a congenital disease, as well as for any neonate with signs of sensorineural hearing loss, as evaluated by a post-partum brainstem Evoked Response Audiometry (BERA), preformed shortly after birth.

Maternal acute CMV infection symptoms were collected as well, including mononucleosis-like symptoms such as fever and malaise, and elevated liver enzymes [22].

Data collection

Data was retrieved from the computerized comprehensive database of our CMV Clinic. The following demographic and CMV related maternal properties were recorded: age, gravidity, parity, any maternal chronic diseases, CMV serology status during and prior to conception (including IgG, IgM, IgM VIDAS and IgG Avidity), urinary qualitative PCR for CMV detection, maternal symptoms (fever, malaise) and laboratory results (Aspartate Transaminase [AST], Alanine Transaminase [AST]) during acute CMV infection, gestational age at CMV infection diagnosis, as well as gestational age at urine analysis and amniocentesis.

Maternal urinary tests for CMV were performed during the first visit in our CMV clinic, which was scheduled as soon as maternal primary infection was diagnosed by serology for 6 weeks after diagnosis at the latest. Only one test was taken from each woman, in order to avoid different time points that may have caused a bias in test interpretation.

The following obstetrical, fetal and neonatal parameters were recorded: gestational age at delivery, mode of delivery, birth weight, gender, PCR results for CMV DNA in amniocentesis, neonatal urine analysis via PCR for CMV detection and neonatal BERA test.

Imaging studies are routinely performed among primary CMV infected women in order to assess the probability of symptomatic congenital disease of the fetus and newborn. We collected sonographic and brain MRI fetal findings which are typical (but not pathognomonic or specific) for congenital CMV disease, including bilateral periventricular calcifications (hyperechoic foci), intraventricular adhesions, cerebral ventriculomegaly, microcephaly, fetal growth restriction, hyperechogenic fetal bowel, hepatic calcifications and hepatosplenomegaly [21, 23,24,25,26,27].

Outcome measures

The primary outcome measures of the study were defined as congenital CMV infection in the positive versus negative urinary excretion of CMV, determined by either CMV-positive amniocentesis or neonatal urine and as congenital CMV disease, determined by typical sonographic or MRI findings and/or by neonatal abnormal BERA test results.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was generated using SAS Software, Version 9.4. Continuous variables were presented by mean and standard deviation. Categorical variables were presented by number and percentage. Categorical data were analyzed using Fisher’s exact test and continuous variables were compared using Mann–Whitney–Wilcoxon test as appropriate. Two-sided p values less than .05 were considered statistically significant.


The study was approved by the local Institutional Review Board at Rabin Medical Center, approval no. RMC-13-0237.


Overall, during the study period, 1632 women visited the CMV clinic. One hundred and eighty-two (11.15%) women were diagnosed with primary CMV infection. Of them, 56 were excluded: 22 did not have maternal urinary CMV analysis results, 18 had periconceptional CMV infection, 7 participated in another clinical trial, 8 had no neonatal CMV urinary analysis or amniocentesis results and one had a multiple gestation. Eventually, 126 women met the inclusion criteria and were divided into two study groups according to CMV urinary excretion: 77 (61.11%) women with positive urinary excretion and 49 (38.89%) with negative urinary excretion. Demographic and baseline maternal characteristics are presented in Table 1. Women with positive urinary CMV excretion were slightly, although significantly, older than the non-excreting group (31.2 vs. 29.7 years, p = 0.043), with no other significant differences in gravidity, parity and maternal chronic diseases.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the study population

Among infants diagnosed with in utero CMV infection (overall 36 cases), 23 were diagnosed based on positive CMV PCR, and 24 had CMV urinary excretion detected after birth in the newborn infant. 11 cases had both CMV PCR and CMV urinary excretion. We found that the congenital CMV infection rate was higher in the positive urinary excretion group (33.8% vs. 20.4% In the non-excretion group, p = 0.209), however the congenital CMV disease rate was lower in this group (18.2% vs. 22.4%, p = 0.648). These findings were not statistically significant.

Maternal CMV serology patterns are presented in Table 2. We found a significant difference in CMV Avidity between the two groups - the positive urinary CMV excretion had higher rates of low avidity compared to the non-excretion group (54.6% vs. 36.7%, p = 0.007). Non-significant trends demonstrated similar IgG (81.8% vs. 87.8% in the non-excretion group, p = 0.458) and IgM positive VIDAS (an automated enzyme-linked fluorescent immunoassay, for the detection CMV IgM antibodies) (78% vs. 85.8% in the non-excretion group, p = 0.399) rates, as well as similar gestational age at CMV infection diagnosis (17.4 vs. 16.4 weeks in the positive excretion group, p = 0.464).

Table 2 CMV Infection related maternal properties

We also compared separately sonographic and MRI findings that are typical for congenital CMV infection between the two study groups (Table 3). Positive MRI findings rates (8.1% vs. 5.2% in the positive excretion group, p = 0.391), and sonographic typical findings (10.2% vs. 7.8% in the positive excretion group, p = 0.746) were comparable between the groups.

Table 3 Pregnancy and neonatal outcome

An additional analysis was made to examine a possible difference in CMV excretion patterns and congenital CMV infection rate between symptomatic and asymptomatic women. Symptomatic women had a non-significant trend of higher rates of both maternal urinary excretion (70% vs. 60.5%, p = 0.388) and congenital infection rates (40.7% vs. 31.2%, p = 0.400). We investigated different obstetric parameters and found that both groups had similar rates of termination of pregnancy, gestational age at delivery and neonatal birth weight.


In the current study we aimed to investigate the association between maternal urinary CMV excretion and the rate of congenital CMV infection and disease, among women with primary CMV infection. Our findings reveal no significant association between maternal urinary CMV excretion and fetal congenital infection or disease, thereupon weakening the assumption that it might have a possible role as a predictive factor for congenital infection. Nevertheless, our study raises some interesting issues which are discussed below, and warrant further evaluations in large scale studies. CMV is shed in the urine and other bodily fluids for months after seroconversion [28], or even years in cases of infants with a diagnosis of congenital infection. The rate of CMV urinary excretion differs according to the week of infection and the week of urine analysis [29], and therefore varies between different studies. Some studies reported a rate of 3–5% [30, 31] while others reported CMV viruria as high as 13% [29, 32]. In comparison, our study demonstrated that the rate of positive CMV excreting women was significantly higher (61.11%), possibly due to our inclusion of women with exclusively primary infection. We should also be mindful to the fact that maternal CMV urinary shedding increases with gestation [28], and diagnosis of CMV infection occurred a week later among the women with positive urinary excretion (17.4 weeks of gestation vs. 16.4 in women without CMV urinary excretion). Regardless, it is possible that our results imply that CMV urinary shedding is more prevalent in women with primary infection than in those with re-infection or re-activation, however the latter were excluded from our study.

Efforts are made in order to better predict congenital CMV infection and disease in infants born to women who were infected with the virus, especially during the first trimester of pregnancy. The role of CMV urinary excretion is not well studied as a possible predictor for these outcomes and is mainly considered as non-related to intrauterine vertical transmission of the virus. Lazzarotto et al. [33], in a comprehensive review of new advances in congenital CMV infection diagnosis, described the secondary role of virological testing of maternal secretions and reported low positive prediction rates of 57.1% for congenital CMV infection and disease in infants of women who excreted CMV in the urine in the first two trimesters of pregnancy. However, in this study there was no stratification according to primary and non-primary infection.

Our results show that women with CMV viruria had a significantly higher rate of low avidity in comparison to women without presence of CMV in their urine. These results raise the possibility that urinary CMV excretion is associated with a more recent infection. Our results point to the possibility that infants of women who shed CMV in their urine were probably infected more recently and might have a higher risk for congenital CMV infection than women who do not excrete the virus in their urine.

After diagnosis of a congenital CMV infection is made, further evaluation is required in order to predict the likelihood and severity of congenital disease. This includes imaging studies, mainly sonographic but recently also with fetal MRI [34, 35], which all aim to better predict possible neurodevelopmental delays by identifying typical findings [21, 23,24,25, 36].. As part of our intent to evaluate the association between maternal urinary CMV excretion and congenital disease, we investigated possible differences in imaging findings between the two study groups, under the assumption that if urinary CMV excretion increases the risk for fetal infection there might also be more sonographic and MRI abnormalities in these fetuses. Our results show no significant differences between the groups, neither when comparing the sonographic and MRI findings nor when comparing neonatal sensorineural hearing loss, therefore denoting that we could not establish an association.

Less than 5% of women infected with CMV are symptomatic [37]; however, the symptoms - such as malaise, fever and fatigue - are highly non-specific for CMV infection. Having said that, we should bear in mind that it is possible that symptoms that were reported by the women in our study were actually non-CMV related.

The strength of our study lies in the specific selection of a maternal population with primary CMV infection, and the selection of a scarcely investigated association in current literature. Additionally, the study was conducted in a single large tertiary medical center, with a high quality dedicated CMV clinic that was the key coordinator of follow up and evaluation of the patients who participated in the study. The main limitation of the study is the relatively small sample size. Due to our exclusion criteria and the sometimes-hard diagnosis of accurate timing of infection, we had to exclude a relatively large number of women. Importantly, urinary CMV shedding may be intermittent and/or prolonged [38] - therefore causing bias.

In conclusion, among women with primary CMV infection in pregnancy, we could not find an association of either urinary excretion of CMV and symptomatic maternal CMV infection, with a higher risk for congenital CMV infection and disease. However, our findings do reveal that urinary CMV excretion is associated with a more recent infection. Further studies with larger study groups are needed in order to establish these conclusions.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


  1. Kenneson A, Cannon MJ. Review and meta-analysis of the epidemiology of congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Rev Med Virol. 2007;17:253–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Goderis J, De Leenheer E, Smets K, et al. Hearing loss and congenital CMV infection: a systematic review. Pediatrics. 2014;134:972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fowler KB, Stagno S, Pass RF. Maternal immunity and prevention of congenital cytomegalovirus infection. JAMA. 2003;289:1008–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Stagno S, Pass RF, Cloud G, Britt WJ, Henderson RE, Walton PD, et al. Primary cytomegalovirus infection in pregnancy, incidence, transmission to the fetus and clinical outcome. JAMA. 1986;256:1904–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bodéus M, Hubinont C, Goubau P. Increased risk of cytomegalovirus transmission in utero during late gestation. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;93:658–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Picone O, Vauloup-Fellous C, Cordier AG, et al. A series of 238 cytomegalovirus primary infections during pregnancy: description and outcome. Prenat Diagn. 2013;33:751–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bodéus M, Kabamba-Mukadi B, Zech F, et al. Human cytomegalovirus in utero transmission: follow-up of 524 maternal seroconversions. J Clin Virol. 2010;47:201–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Revello MG, Zavattoni M, Furione M, et al. Diagnosis and outcome of preconceptional and periconceptional primary human cytomegalovirus infections. J Infect Dis. 2002;186:553–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gindes L, Teperberg-Oikawa M, Sherman D, et al. Congenital cytomegalovirus infection following primary maternal infection in the third trimester. BJOG. 2008;115:830–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Feldman B, Yinon Y, Tepperberg Oikawa M, et al. Pregestational, periconceptional, and gestational primary maternal cytomegalovirus infection: prenatal diagnosis in 508 pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205:342.e1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hadar E, Salzer L, Dorfman E, Amir J, Pardo J. Antenatal risk factors for symptomatic congenital CMV disease following primary maternal CMV infection. J Perinat Med. 2016;44(3):339–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hadar, Dorfman E, Bardin R, Gabbay-Benziv R, Amir J, Pardo J. Symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus disease following non-primary maternal infection: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Infect Dis. 2017; 17:31.

  13. Grangeot-Keros L, Mayaux MJ, Lebon P, et al. Value of cytomegalovirus (CMV) IgG avidity index for the diagnosis of primary CMV infection in pregnant women. J Infect Dis. 1997;175:944–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Leruez-Ville M, Sellier Y, Salomon LJ, et al. Prediction of fetal infection in cases with cytomegalovirus immunoglobulin M in the first trimester of pregnancy: a retrospective cohort. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;56:1428–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Guerra B, Lazzarotto T, Quarta S, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183:476–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Azam AZ, Vial Y, Fawer CL, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;97:443–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Liesnard C, Donner C, Brancart F, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of congenital cytomegalovirus infection: prospective study of 237 pregnancies at risk. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95:881–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Delforge M-L, Costa E, Brancart F, et al. Presence of cytomegalovirus in urine and blood of pregnant women with primary infection might be associated with fetal infection. J Clin Virol. 2017;90:14–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bodéus M, Van Ranst M, Bernard P, et al. Anticytomegalovirus IgG avidity in pregnancy: a 2-year prospective study. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2002;17:362–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kanengisser-Pines B, Hazan Y, Pines G, Appelman Z. High cytomegalovirus IgG avidity is a reliable indicator of past infection in patients with positive IgM detected during the first trimester of pregnancy. J Perinat Med. 2009;37:15–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Malinger G, Lev D, Zahalka N, et al. Fetal cytomegalovirus infection of the brain: the spectrum of sonographic findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003;24:28–32.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Bonnet F, Neau D, Viallard JF, Morlat P, Ragnaud JM, Dupon M, et al. Clinical and laboratory findings of cytomegalovirus infection in 115 hospitalized non-immunocompromised adults. Ann Med Interne (Paris). 2001;152(4):227–35.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Picone O, Teissier N, Cordier AG, et al. Detailed in utero ultrasound description of 30 cases of congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Prenat Diagn. 2014;34:518–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Dogan Y, Yuksel A, Kalelioglu IH, et al. Intracranial ultrasound abnormalities and fetal cytomegalovirus infection: report of 8 cases and review of the literature. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2011;30:141–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Simonazzi G, Guerra B, Bonasoni P, et al. Fetal cerebral periventricular halo at midgestation: an ultrasound finding suggestive of fetal cytomegalovirus infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202:599.e1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pereira L, Petitt M, Fong A, et al. Intrauterine growth restriction caused by underlying congenital cytomegalovirus infection. J Infect Dis. 2014;209:1573–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Birnbaum R, Ben-Sira L, Lerman-Sagie T, Malinger G. The use of fetal neurosonography and brain MRI in cases of cytomegalovirus infection during pregnancy: a retrospective analysis with outcome correlation. Prenat Diagn. 2017;37(13):1335–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Cannon MJ, Hyde TB, Schmid DS. Review of cytomegalovirus shedding in bodily fluids and relevance to congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Rev Med Virol. 2011;21:240–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Shen CY, Chang SF, Yen MS, Ng HT, Huang ES, Wu CW. Cytomegalovirus excretion in pregnant and nonpregnant women. J Clin Microbiol. 1993;31(6):1635–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Montgomery R, Youngblood L, Medearis DN Jr. Recovery of cytomegalovirus from the cervix in pregnancy. Pediatrics. 1972;49:524–31.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Şahiner F, Honca M, Çekmez Y, et al. The role of maternal screening in diagnosing congenital cytomegalovirus infections in highly immune populations. Ir J Med Sci. 2015;184:475–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Pass RF, Stagno S, Dworsky ME, Smith RJ, Alford CA. Excretion of cytomegalovirus in mothers: observations after delivery of congenitally infected and normal infants. J Infect Dis. 1982;146:1–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Lazzarotto T, Guerra B, Lanari M, Gabrielli L, Landini MP. New advances in the diagnosis of congenital cytomegalovirus infection. J Clin Virol. 2008;41:192–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Picone O, Simon I, Benachi A, Brunelle F, Sonigo P. Comparison between ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in assessment of fetal cytomegalovirus infection. Prenat Diagn. 2008;28:753–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Salmaso R, Franco R, de Santis M, Carollo C, Suma V, Righini A, et al. Early detection by magnetic resonance imaging of fetal cerebral damage in a fetus with hydrops and cytomegalovirus infection. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2007;20:559–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Kwak M, Yum M-S, Yeh H-R, Kim H-J, Ko T-S. Brain magnetic resonance imaging findings of congenital cytomegalovirus infection as a prognostic factor for neurological outcome. Pediatr Neurol. 2018;83:14–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Pass RF, Boppana S., Jeffries DJ, Hudson CN. Viral infection in obstetrics and gynaecology. New York, NY. Arnold. 1999:35–6.

  38. Rosenthal LS, Fowler KB, Boppana SB, et al. Cytomegalovirus shedding and delayed sensorineural hearing loss: results from longitudinal follow-up of children with congenital infection. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2009;28:515–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


Not applicable.



Author information

Authors and Affiliations



RZ collected all raw data and took the lead in manuscript writing. EB, JP and LS contributed to interpretation of lab results, provided critical feedback and helped in manuscript writing and editing. RB assisted with ultrasound scans interpretation and manuscript editing. EH conceived the presented idea. AS was in charge of overall direction and planning. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anat Shmueli.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the local Institutional Review Board at Rabin Medical Center, approval no. RMC-13-0237. All experiments were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. The requirement for informed consent was exempted by the local Institutional Review Board at Rabin Medical Center, Israel.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zlatkin, R., Bilavsky, E., Pardo, J. et al. The association between maternal cytomegalovirus urinary excretion and congenital infection rate. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 21, 741 (2021).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • CMV
  • Cytomegalovirus
  • Congenital infection
  • Maternal infection
  • Urinary excretion